Western
List activity
467 views
• 2 this weekCreate a new list
List your movie, TV & celebrity picks.
39 titles
- DirectorJohn FordStarsJohn WayneClaire TrevorAndy DevineA group of people traveling on a stagecoach find their journey complicated by the threat of Geronimo and learn something about each other in the process.Patternmaker
A coachman, a marshal, a gambler, a drunken doctor, a banker, a runaway convict, a whiskey salesman, a prostitute, and a pregnant girl from higher class travel together by stagecoach. Their class differences and prejudice are highlighted until Apaches attack them. John Wayne successfully keeps Indians at distance until the cavalry arrives to save the day. It seems like this is just one of those "you see one, you saw them all" westerns, and, while I have no objections to this movie, it still is just one of the many movies made in typical western pattern. What distinguishes this movie from the rest in that pattern is the fact that this is the first one, one that wrote recipe many others followed and one that made John Wayne a star. And Thomas Mitchell definitely earned his Oscar, because, in my opinion, the drunken doctor is the highlight of this movie.
7/10 - DirectorHoward HughesHoward HawksStarsJack BuetelThomas MitchellJane RussellWestern legends Pat Garrett, Doc Holliday and Billy the Kid are played against each other over the law and the attentions of vivacious country vixen Rio McDonald."A Sale of Two Titties"
Howard Hughes' controversial Western is the film debut of Jane Russell, the girl who got the role after Howard's thorough pursuit of an actress as busty as possible. As much as it is Western, it is also a "sexploitation movie", even advertised with the slogan: "What are the two great reasons for Jane Russell's rise to stardom?" In addition to taking every opportunity to highlight Jane Russell's lush breasts, the film also contains a scene between her and Billy the Kid bordering on rape. The consequences of this approach were censorship and court proceedings, but also a large audience response. I too was attracted by advertising and I watched it solely because of the controversy it caused, but I have to say that I was not disappointed with the movie itself. The story is interesting and departs from the standard Western pattern, showing us the fictitious relationships of Pat Garrett, Doc Holliday and Billy the Kid in a way you will not encounter elsewhere and with a quite good characterization. It is far from a masterpiece of cinema, but I really did not have any major objections and I warmly recommend it.
7/10 - DirectorJohn FordStarsHenry FondaLinda DarnellVictor MatureAfter their cattle are stolen and their brother murdered, the Earp brothers have a score to settle with the Clanton family.Nothing special
I have no objections, but it didn't leave strong impression on me. Enjoyable entertainment for boring afternoon.
6,5/10 - DirectorHoward HawksArthur RossonStarsJohn WayneMontgomery CliftJoanne DruDunson leads a cattle drive, the culmination of over 14 years of work, to its destination in Missouri. But his tyrannical behavior along the way causes a mutiny, led by his adopted son.Top 10 best westerns of all time ?! Nope. In my opinion just average movie. After Hawks' Bringing Up Baby, His Girl Friday, Scarface, The Big Sleep... this comes pretty much as disappointment. :(
6/10 - DirectorFred ZinnemannStarsGary CooperGrace KellyThomas MitchellA town Marshal, despite the disagreements of his newlywed bride and the townspeople around him, must face a gang of deadly killers alone at "high noon" when the gang leader, an outlaw he "sent up" years ago, arrives on the noon train.A drama disguised as a western
There's no chasing and just a little bit of gunfire, nothing like western movies we are used to. The movie is almost in real-time. The eighty-five minutes of the film cover approximately two hours in a small town awaiting the return of a notorious murderer who escaped hanging and is coming to take revenge on the man who arrested him and sent him to the gallows. There is almost no action at all. The plot is about what is happening inside the people involved, psychologically and emotionally. It's not a masterpiece, but it is quite good.
7,5/10 - DirectorGeorge StevensStarsAlan LaddJean ArthurVan HeflinAn ex-gunfighter defends homesteaders in 1889 Wyoming.It is considered one of the best films of all time. And once again, I'm too stupid to figure out why... Average tra-la-la western story. It is not bad for a western, although it is not much above the average in the genre, and within the entire history of the film, I'm not giving it a crumb above the six.
6/10 - DirectorJohn SturgesStarsSpencer TracyRobert RyanAnne FrancisA one-armed stranger comes to a tiny town possessing a terrible past they want to keep secret, by violent means if necessary.Psychological western with moral lesson. Quite well done, but nothing special. Although it lasts less than 90 minutes, even that's too much. Given that it leaves the impression of the mediocre Hitchcock movie, it would be a good half-hour episode of the "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" series.
6/10 - DirectorJohn FordStarsJohn WayneJeffrey HunterVera MilesAn American Civil War veteran embarks on a years-long journey to rescue his niece from the Comanches after the rest of his brother's family is massacred in a raid on their Texas farm.Just after watching this movie I run onto the newest list of Top 50 Movies of All Times. This one takes 7th place and Wild Bunch is not on the list at all. Screw that list. The movie is not bad, but it has a tendency to bore a bit. Nice story, solidly made and that's it.
6/10 - DirectorWilliam BeaudineStarsJohn CarradineChuck CourtneyMelinda CaseyDracula travels to the American Old West, intent on making a young and beautiful female ranch owner his vampire bride. Her fiance, the reformed outlaw Billy the Kid, finds out about it and rushes to save her."Billy the Kid Versus Dracula"... WTF?! As much as title promises complete nonsense, you must admit it makes you bit curious... I expected mix of western and horror that parodies this two cult movies or spoofs western and Dracula genres in general. I could bet this movie is dumb, but I hoped it is somewhat funny. Even when I realized I can not find it anywhere I simply could not give up. When I finally found online stream and saw its terrible quality of both picture and sound (probably pirate VHS rip of 1966. movie) I still could not resist. And I'm glad I didn't.
Movie is not comedy or parody. It is based on classic Dracula plot, puts it in Wild West scenery, and enriches it with western elements, making plot more interesting. Story is more complex than in original Dracula and combines western, classic Dracula horror and romance in some kind of thriller. Although production is bad and special effects ridiculous, story is good enough to hold your attention in spite everything else being bad. Also, movie is just over an hour long and that leaves no room for idling. And end... to me it is awesome. Final clash between Billy the Kid and Dracula, that last just few moments, is one of shortest, most efficient and funniest fighting scenes in movie history. I had to rewind this scene more than a few times with huge smile on my face.
Objectively, this movie does not deserve more than weak four, but it is original for nine. Overall, warm recommendation to fans of old Dracula movies.
6,5/10 - DirectorSam PeckinpahStarsWilliam HoldenErnest BorgnineRobert RyanAn aging group of outlaws look for one last big score as the "traditional" American West is disappearing around them."We all dream of being a child again, even the worst of us. Perhaps the worst most of all."
I didn't expect a Western to have such depth, plus immense amounts of brutal shooting and destruction, which made it one of the most controversial films of all time. Also, many consider it the best western of all time. I would not go that far, but it definitely is worth your time.
8/10 - DirectorMichael CiminoStarsKris KristoffersonChristopher WalkenJohn HurtDuring the Johnson County War in 1890 Wyoming, a sheriff born into wealth does his best to protect immigrant farmers from rich cattle interests.I can't decide if it is a masterpiece or a piece of crap...
I'm watching this movie and it seems so familiar, but I can't point my finger at anything specific. Then, at the end, I see that the movie is written and directed by Michael Cimino, the same guy who did "The Deer Hunter". This is one very strange movie. It possesses a touch of magnificence and epic greatness but, at the same time, it is unbelievable crap. The original length was five hours but, after the fiasco in theaters, it was cut to three and a half hours and it is still inhumanely stretched considering what the movie has to offer. If it would somehow pull off to keep that epic charm and greatness being cut to ninety minutes, I would give it 9/10 but, as it chokes like a high-school textbook for a boring subject and loses itself in vagueness, I can't go above 6/10.
"Heaven's Gate" was a complete fiasco and it caused the bankruptcy of United Artist studio, which is sold to MGM for a small price because of that. Also, this movie killed the popularity of the western genre during the rest of the '80s.
"It fails so completely that you might suspect Mr. Cimino sold his soul to obtain the success of The Deer Hunter and the Devil has just come around to collect" - New York Times
But after all, it is still worth watching, because it simply has that something...
6/10 - DirectorChristopher CainStarsEmilio EstevezKiefer SutherlandLou Diamond PhillipsA group of young gunmen, led by Billy the Kid, become deputies to avenge the murder of the rancher who became their benefactor. But when Billy takes their authority too far, they become the hunted.Childhood memories
I loved this movie as a kid, and I love it still. It is not a masterpiece, but it was never meant to be. It's a good entertainment with interesting interpretations of the famous names of Old West, brought on the big screen by some famous names of the new, such as Emilio Estevez, Kiefer Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, and Jack Palance. Do not expect too much, just take your popcorn and enjoy the ride.
7/10 - DirectorGeoff MurphyStarsEmilio EstevezKiefer SutherlandLou Diamond PhillipsBilly the Kid and his band of outlaws are pursued across New Mexico territory by Sheriff Pat Garrett, whom the young gunslingers must face-off with if they are to reach the safety of the border.Better than the first one
As a kid I was a huge fan of Bon Jovi and the song "Blaze of Glory" was the only reason I watched this movie. They wanted to include "Wanted Dead or Alive" on the soundtrack for this movie, but Jon thought it had inappropriate lyrics and decided to write a new song especially for "Young Guns II", a new song that became one of his greatest hits. He even has a cameo appearance in the movie, so I definitely had to see it. And I'm glad I did. This stunning Western adventure drama tells the story about Billy the Kid and Pat Garrett. It has an excellent cast, good characterization, story with depth, lots of entertaining action and awesome music, crowned with the legendary "Blaze of Glory".
8/10 - DirectorP.J. PesceStarsMarco LeonardiMichael ParksAra CeliSet 100 years ago in Mexico, this horror/western is the story of the birth of the vampire princess Santanico Pandemonium."You have no idea what you have unleashed"
After the second part, I was at the edge of giving up on the third one. But this one actually is not bad at all. It is a prequel to the original movie, it takes place about hundred years before and tells a story about the origins of Santanico Pandemonium. It is far from the complexity and quality of the first film, but at least it is obvious that Rodriguez was directly involved in making it. While he is just executive producer of the second movie, here he is also the screenwriter and, by default, it makes the movie worth watching.
6/10 - DirectorGore VerbinskiStarsJohnny DeppArmie HammerWilliam FichtnerNative American warrior Tonto recounts the untold tales that transformed John Reid, a man of the law, into a legend of justice.Western "Pirates of the Caribbean"
This is one of those movies that critics destroyed without a good reason. I read bad reviews and I cross myself with left, right and my feet. It got some bad reviews from critics so a bunch of smart-asses decided to lubricate it with their own spit. To be clear, I do not have respect for the majority of professional critics. I especially don't pay attention to negative reviews. On the contrary, they often make me want to see the movie even more. If I skipped everything critics tried to destroy I would miss a bunch of excellent movies.
They say it's not accurate. Accurate to what?! It is not a historical movie and it's not a remake. The old one was a Western classic and this one is an adventure/comedy. They criticize the quality of the screenplay and acting. Sure, no one could get an Oscar for it, but it was not the intention of this movie. This is Disney adventure with the goal to entertain, not to be Nobel prize level literature or Oscar contestant. But what shocked me the most was an argument that appeared in several negative reviews. They said this movie is essentially a Western version of "Pirates of the Caribbean" as if it were a bad thing!!! For God's sake, in what universe this could be shortcoming?! If you did not like "Pirates" why the hell did you even try to watch this? Being a Western version of "Pirates" is probably the main reason I wanted to see this and it is definitely the main reason I loved it.
I had many things to say about this movie, but, after I discovered this phrase, everything else I could possibly say becomes redundant. Those five words are absolutely perfect to describe this movie completely:
Western "Pirates of the Caribbean" equals must watch!!!
8,5/10 - DirectorSeth MacFarlaneStarsSeth MacFarlaneCharlize TheronLiam NeesonAs a cowardly farmer begins to fall for the mysterious new woman in town, he must put his newly found courage to the test when her husband, a notorious gun-slinger, announces his arrival."There is something about connecting over mutual hatred that is just so much deeper than mutual love"
Why the hell does this movie have such a low rating? Ok, it isn't a masterpiece of cinema, but they didn't intend it to be. It was made to make us laugh and I laughed a lot. For its artistic value even 6 is too much, but as a comedy it deserves at least
8/10 - DirectorQuentin TarantinoStarsSamuel L. JacksonKurt RussellJennifer Jason LeighIn the dead of a Wyoming winter, a bounty hunter and his prisoner find shelter in a cabin currently inhabited by a collection of nefarious characters.Tarantino's last movie belongs to western sub-genre known as anti- western. While classic western has clear, even black and white distinction between good and evil, where we know from the start who's good and who's bad and we are drawn to root for good guys, anti- western brings more realistic picture of Wild West. In old movies white folks are good guys and Indians are cruel primitives, or sheriff against evil gang and similar fairy-tale plots. Pretty unfair and unrealistic. Anti-western is trying to show things in shades of gray, from the "villains" point of view, making them just another people who are fighting for their spot under the sun.
This genre by itself raised up my expectations. And when you add Tarantino as writer and director, Morricone in charge of music, and in leading roles we have Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Michael Madsen, Tim Roth, this movie is masterpiece in advance. Board game "who-did- it murder mystery" played out as theater play and made into movie. Everything is played out in single room and it's based more on dialogue than action. It starts slow, gradually builds atmosphere and culminate in explosive finale. Almost everything in this movie is Oscar material, from the screenplay, scenography, camera, directing to excellent acting. Jackson is expectedly great in a role that's perfect for him, but Jennifer Jason Leigh definitely stole the movie with her absolutely magical performance. Still, movie misses "that something" for me to rate it ten out of ten.
9/10 - DirectorDavid MackenzieStarsChris PineBen FosterJeff BridgesToby is a divorced father who's trying to make a better life. His brother is an ex-con with a short temper and a loose trigger finger. Together, they plan a series of heists against the bank that's about to foreclose on their family ranch.Overrated 21st Century Western
Warning: Spoilers
I don't understand how this movie became so popular. Is it good? Yes, it is. But it's not an Oscar material. A classic western story put in the 21st century. Already seen many times, just in different scenery. It is even boring at first half. I was close to giving up on it after 45 minutes, but then I realized it is too late in the evening to start some other movie, so I finished it. And I'm not sorry that I did. But I would not watch it again for sure. I'll try to list what I think is really good about this movie. Jeff Bridges nailed his role. It is the only deserved Oscar nomination for this movie. I especially loved his "racist" jokes about Indians and Mexicans, and perfect timing for them. Jokes are good themselves, but in Jeff's interpretation, they are awesome. Further, the soundtrack is excellent. And finally, Ben Foster had a few really memorable scenes. First, when he leaves the car and goes towards persecutors, like Rambo, shooting bursts of machine gun fire. Second, the moment when he says: "Lord of the plains... that's me." and then takes a bullet in the head. Everything else is mediocre and mostly already seen.
7/10 - DirectorSergio LeoneStarsClint EastwoodGian Maria VolontèMarianne KochA wandering gunfighter plays two rival families against each other in a town torn apart by greed, pride, and revenge.The man with no name
This is the second film by Sergio Leone, one of the biggest names in the western genre, and the first film of his cult "Dollar Trilogy". It opens with an animated sequence showing contours of riders, followed with melody by legendary Ennio Morricone. The soundtrack for this movie is a masterpiece of film music that engraves itself in your mind forever. It will be outmatched in the last part of the trilogy by a similar melody, which has become one of the most famous movie compositions of all time.
Clint Eastwood is a mysterious nameless gunslinger, who comes into a town ruled by two opposed gangs. Using his incredible revolver skill, as well as intelligent intrigues and traps, he makes the gangs kill each other and wipes off the remains himself. Apparently soulless, cruel, and interested only in dollars, he still acts on the side of the good, but his character remains completely covered with the veil of the mystery. Who he is, where he comes from and what are his motives remains unknown.
The film features a mesmerizing camera and directing. Long slow shots shifts with brief flashy action scenes. The story relies more on body language and facial expression than on dialogues, and replicas are short, terse, effective and pervaded by dark humor.
10/10
Interestingly, the movie cost about $ 200,000, which is equivalent to today's million and a half, which is still a pretty small budget for one of the best movies of all time. - DirectorSergio LeoneStarsClint EastwoodLee Van CleefGian Maria VolontèTwo bounty hunters with the same intentions team up to track down a gang of outlaws led by a psychotic Mexican bandit, who is plotting an audacious bank robbery."Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now."
"Dollars" aka "Man With No Name" trilogy is considered a trilogy because all three movies are written and directed by Sergio Leone, music for all three is written by Ennio Morricone and in all Clint Eastwood is playing leading role. Also, all three are spaghetti westerns with similar theme and atmosphere. However, their stories are not connected and Eastwood plays three different characters.
This time around, Eastwood is a bounty hunter who crosses paths with his match and they together start a hunt for a notorious gang that will bring them a huge reward. The story and characters are more complex than in the first movie and you can see certain progress in many ways, but personally, I find this movie too long and somewhat diluted. The majority consider this movie to be better than "Fistful of Dollars" and I completely understand their point of view and even agree to some extent, but I can not go against my subjective impression. Although I can not point my finger and put forth solid arguments for it, "For a Few Dollars More" has left a bit weaker impression on me. While I rated its predecessor 10 out of ten, here I can not go higher than
8,5/10 - DirectorSergio LeoneStarsClint EastwoodEli WallachLee Van CleefA bounty hunting scam joins two men in an uneasy alliance against a third in a race to find a fortune in gold buried in a remote cemetery.The Good, the Better and the Best
They say nothing's perfect, there's always room for improvement. I say they never saw "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly". It's pointless for me to write about this movie, because it would be just a listing of every single aspect of it and saying it's perfect. So I'll just mention the most perfect of perfections - the music. It's not just the masterpiece among movie soundtracks, it is a legendary monument of music overall.
10/10 - DirectorSergio LeoneStarsHenry FondaCharles BronsonClaudia CardinaleA mysterious stranger with a harmonica joins forces with a notorious desperado to protect a beautiful widow from a ruthless assassin working for the railroad.Who are these people?!
Damn, I don't know where to start. First, there's no Clint Eastwood. Why the hell this movie does not have Clint Eastwood?! There's no John Wayne either. If there is neither Eastwood nor Wayne it is not Western. I mean, who are these people?! Whoever heard of Charles Bronson and Henry Fonda ?! OK, maybe true cinephiles did, but we ordinary mortals did not pay a ticket to watch some unknown faces that only fans of art drama know. Second, the story. The story is so superficial and shallow and linear that it does not hold attention for half an hour, let alone three. And not to speak about racism and sexism. All the main characters are white. Few black people appear here and there as servants and few Indians just briefly pass the screen and that's about all diversity you'll get. And not the single gay man. Leading female character is a prostitute. A prostitute is a woman they pay for sex. And this actress is so nasty that I would not touch her even if she paid me. Claudia Cardinale?! Why didn't he cast Sharon Stone or Charlize Theron to fill theaters properly. Or, even better, Laura Dern, so we can watch this instead of porn. No, he cast some grandma born in '38, my goodness. And this Morricone is all the same. The fourth film in a row he can not think of nothing new, so he steals music from the commercials. And the one with the harmonica that knows only two tones. He could have learned at least one decent song if he wanted to play a musician. I mean, really...
I'm sorry. I read bullshit reviews every day for years and I just had to try. I saw "Dollar Trilogy" several times and I was sure it is a peak of the genre. And until now, when I'm almost forty, I didn't realize I haven't seen "Once Upon a Time in the West". This movie could be added as the fourth part of the "trilogy". Instead of Eastwood, Wallach and Van Cleef here we have Fonda, Robards and Bronson, but although I personally prefer the first three, I must admit that these are no worse. Leone and Morricone managed to maintain the standard that they set up by the "trilogy", and the story, although significantly different than in a trilogy, is no less complex and brutal. For my taste, three hours is a bit too much, but the film is not boring for a moment, and Claudia Cardinale I could easily watch for six hours. However, I have to distance it from "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" at least a bit, so I rate it
9,5/10 - DirectorSergio LeoneStarsRod SteigerJames CoburnRomolo ValliA low-life bandit and an I.R.A. explosives expert rebel against the government and become heroes of the Mexican Revolution.You're a grand hero of the revolution now
"I know what I am talking about when I am talking about revolutions. The people who read the books go to the people who can't read the books, the poor people, and say, 'We have to have a change.' So, the poor people make the change. And then, the people who read the books, they all sit around the big polished tables, and they talk and talk and talk and eat and eat and eat. But what has happened to the poor people? They are dead! That's your revolution! So, please, don't tell me about revolutions. And what happens afterwards? The same fucking thing starts all over again!"
From the very beginning, the film will shamelessly attract your attention. It is opened by the close-up of the urine stream, drowning insects on the tree. Close-up shots on details, especially the face and eyes, are a kind of trademark of Sergio Leone, and he uses them skillfully and frequently to show the atmosphere and more accurately depict the psychological state of his characters. For the fifth consecutive time, music was entrusted to the legendary Ennio Morricone, but it is so different from the music in the previous films that by style I would never have thought that Morricone was in question. Moreover, it did not fit in with the movie, and it irritated me so much that I was tempted to watch the film without sound.
This time, instead of a gunslinger, the main character is an explosive specialist, an Irish revolutionary who is forced to leave his homeland, and goes to join the revolutionaries in Mexico. Along the way, he meets Mexican bandit and tricks him into joining him and helping the cause. Although it definitely is Western, this film greatly differs from the classic representatives of the genre, because it is also socially and politically colored war drama, as well as a psychological study of morality, family, friendship and searching for oneself. The presence of humor somewhat dilutes the rather heavy atmosphere of the film and makes it, in my opinion, much more relaxed than this story deserves, but also significantly more fun.
The biggest drawbacks of this film are John's flashbacks, which, although they support the characterization of his character, completely derail the movie from its path, and the last one, in my opinion, is unnecessarily disgusting and more appropriate to some pathetic romantic drama than the war western, as well as totally inappropriate music, which may not be bad in itself, but it does not fit in this movie. If not for flashbacks and music, this movie would stand shoulder to shoulder with other Leone's masterpieces, but these two flaws totally ruined the overall impression.
7,5/10 - DirectorJimmy HaywardStarsJosh BrolinMegan FoxJohn MalkovichIn exchange for his freedom, bounty hunter Jonah Hex must track down a terrorist with a superweapon.Megan Fox alone is worth more than 4,7/10
"Jonah Hex" is an adaptation of DC graphic novel. I didn't read it, but the movie definitely has a comic-book story and comic-book atmosphere. In an interesting way, it combines the superhero genre, by which DC and Marvel are known, with Western, and the features of both genres are individually obvious, but also perfectly integrated into a whole that works quite naturally.
Josh Brolin is Jonah Hex, a former war hero, to whom a tragedy from the past gave some supernatural abilities and turned him into a bounty hunter. He somewhat resembles Clint Eastwood in Leone's "trilogy", though he is much darker and, while for Eastwood we can argue whether he is a hero or antihero, with Hex there is no such dilemma. Leone's influence, besides characterization of the protagonist, is also felt in directing, and some of the frames are an obvious homage to Leone. The main villains are interpreted by John Malkovich and Michael Fassbender, so the level of acting shouldn't be doubted. The leading and practically the only female role is entrusted to Megan Fox. Now, I wouldn't go into her acting skills, but I would gladly... Since she was 24 years old and was in the role of a prostitute, it is a pity that the film is PG-13.
The film has no dialogue or replicas worthy of attention and humor can be found only in trace amounts, but everything else is in the range from satisfactory to fantastic. This supernatural anti-hero western has an interesting and nicely developed story with well-measured pace, compelling characters, appropriate music, a great camera, some beautiful shots, striking colors, good direction, a strong cast, and I do not understand at all why the ratings and reviews are so catastrophically bad. Fortunately, I do not have much confidence in the ratings on the movie sites, because otherwise 4.7/10 on IMDb and Metascore 33 would probably turn me away from watching and I would miss a movie I utterly enjoyed. Usually, I like to read a couple of reviews that praise the film, and a few that spit on it, but this time I am really not in the least interested in the arguments of the haters. As far as I'm concerned, screw them, I'm rating it
8/10 - DirectorQuentin TarantinoStarsJamie FoxxChristoph WaltzLeonardo DiCaprioWith the help of a German bounty-hunter, a freed slave sets out to rescue his wife from a brutal plantation owner in Mississippi.Auf Wiedersehen
My day usually looks like this - I get up about half-past seven, work all day, get back home completely beaten, eat something and then watch a ninety-minute movie, and I fall asleep at the half. Today I woke up at four AM, worked all day, got back home more beaten than usual, are something, played three hours log movie, and I saw it through without blinking. Enough said. I wonder if Tarantino knows how to make a movie that is not fantastic. So far, I didn't rate any below nine out of ten. I will not analyze this one because it is perfect in every aspect. I just want to mention the music. The music is, in my opinion, totally inappropriate for the genre, place and time in which the story is set, and often for what is happening on the screen, and it very distinctly stands out from the film. On the other hand, music is excellent and fiercely enhances the effect of the film. The music is in a perfectly harmonious discord. Madness.
10/10