The Conjuring of a Woman at the House of Robert Houdin (1896) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
By today's standards, it's not good...but for 1896...it was a sensation!
planktonrules10 February 2019
"Escamotage d'une dame au théâtre Robert Houdin" is a very short and simple film. Folks today might no doubt think little of it. But back in 1896, folks were wowed by the film and it spurred actor/director Georges Méliès to make more films like it as well as expand on the tricks he used in this one.

Méliès was a magician before he became a filmmaker. It's obvious in this one as he plays a magician in the film and makes his assistant disappear and then turn into a skeleton. It's all done simply by stopping the camera and restarting it...but the use of edits like this baffled folks in the day and the film deserves kudos for its innovation.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Perhaps the first stop motion film
AlsExGal9 July 2023
Robert Houdin was a French magician and illusionist. He doesn't appear in this early experiment, but his name is loaned to one of the first illusions on film provided by Georges Melies. Melies himself said that this was the first film in which he used stop motion - a process in which illusions could be performed by stopping his camera, rearranging the set, and then starting the camera again, to give the illusion that items and people have either appeared or disappeared.

In this film, an elegantly dressed woman sits in a chair while the magician drapes her with a shroud. The magician removes the shroud and the woman has disappeared. He makes a few gestures and voila! He returns - a skeleton??? Oh the horror!. So he brings the shroud back into the act, covers the skeleton, and the entire woman and her clothes are recovered. Wherever the woman went, the clothes MUST follow! After all this is literally the Victorian era even though it is France.

The magician was played by Georges Melies himself, and the woman was played by Jehanne d'Alcy. D'alcy appeared in numerous Melies films over the years, having left the theater to devote herself to film acting, one of the first actors to do this. The two got married, but oddly not until 1925 when D'Alcy was 60 and Melies was 64. They were married until his death in 1938.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Films Are a Magic Show
kurosawakira2 December 2013
Méliès' "Escamotage d'une dame au théâtre Robert Houdin" (1896) or "The Vanishing Lady" is an early example of trick cinematography, utilizing his renowned and often-used technique of stopping the camera mid-scene and altering the mise en scène. As such, it's highly entertaining, although if you delve deeper into Méliès' films you'll soon become very familiar with this technique and its possible variations.

I hope you read the IMDb comment "Magic and Presentation" (January 27th, 2008) by Cineanalyst, where the history behind the French title is well explained. Knowing the historical background isn't mere trivia here but might actually help you appreciate the film more.

Films are a magic show, and it's good to revisit these older films that explicitly remind us lest we forget.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magic and Presentation
Cineanalyst27 January 2008
"The Vanishing Lady" seems to be the earliest surviving trick film by Georges Méliès (a time-sensitive claim, to be sure). His first films were standard actuality films like those made by the Lumière brothers. One of his earliest films "Playing Cards" (Une partie de cartes) (1896) is, indeed, a remake of the Lumière film, "Card Game" (Partie de cartes) (1895). As the apocryphal story goes, Méliès accidentally discovered trick photography while filming a traffic scene. The camera jammed in the midst of filming, but he was able to get it to work again and resume shooting. The jump cut, or stop-substitution effect, made it appear that a carriage transformed into a hearse and that men turned into women. However, the Edison Company had already realized such an effect, furthered by splicing, such as in "The Execution of Mary, Queen of Scots" (1895). Perhaps, Méliès was inspired by one of these films. After all, he did purchase films from the Edison Company to project at his Robert Houdin Theatre before he set out on making his own pictures. It's known that he did have a copy of "Annabelle Serpentine Dance" (1895)--a film that of which hand-colored prints were sold; Likewise, Méliès would offer hand-colored prints of his films at extra cost, which was the case with "The Vanishing Lady".

Thus, "The Vanishing Lady" isn't novel so much for its tricks; yet, it's novel for the presentation of those tricks. In "The Execution of Mary, Queen of Scots", the stop-substitution effect serves the historical reenactment, and the filmmakers attempted to conceal the trick. Méliès's film, however, is for--is about--the tricks, with the magic act serving to present them. This seems to explain why the Edison Company found little use initially for stop action and editing until they later began to make imitations of Méliès's films. Moreover, as Tom Gunning has explained as the "cinema of attractions", these early films are about presentation and not, as in later narrative films, representation. Later, Méliès would also be instrumental in the development of narrative films.

The vanishing lady trick is based on an actual magic act by Joseph Buatier de Kolta, which Méliès surely could have reproduced on film if he so desired. Indeed, he had previously performed the act on stage at his Robert Houdin theatre. The newspaper bit was important for the traditional magic act, but is only a decorative relic here. Instead, for the film, he employs three stop-substitutions (or, to use a term that recognizes the importance of editing: "substitution splicing")--to make a woman disappear, to make a skeleton appear and then to make the woman reappear--which he would touchup by splicing. Méliès uses especial filmic effects for presentation and, in turn, makes the film about the presentation of this magic. Méliès had invented cinema magic.

There's another trick in this film. The stage setting, with the painted background, is an artificial set created for the film. Méliès, the true auteur that he was, was also responsible for the stage designs of his films. This film was actually filmed outdoors--probably at his garden at Montreuil--for the natural lighting (see the shadows). The film's original French title refers to the act taking place within the Robert Houdin theatre. This wasn't true for the filming of the act, but it was true for its exhibition when Méliès projected the film to his audience.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Lady Vanishes
wes-connors22 July 2012
Magician and filmmaker Georges Melies enters stage right and introduces fashionably dressed Jeanne d'Alcy. He puts a newspaper on the floor. On the newspaper, Mr. Melies places a chair. He invites Ms. D'Alcy, who is standing patiently, to sit on the chair. She complies comfortably and begins to fan herself. Melies throws a cloth over the woman. A slip second later, he removes the cloth and the woman has disappeared. But bringing her back is not a simple as it looks. In the end, the cast takes a bow. Forgetting his chair enables Melies to take a curtain call. He deserves one; this short film is never boring.

****** Escamotage d'une dame au theatre Robert Houdin (1896) Georges Melies ~ Georges Melies, Jeanne d'Alcy
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Early Appearance Of Jump-Cutting
CitizenCaine23 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Georges Melies purchased the exhibition theater of the French magician Robert Houdin and used it for filming many of his films with innovative camera-work, in this case jump- cutting and freeze-framing. Instead of just filming a scene in one take as the earlier actuality films, Melies edits (almost seamlessly) a couple scenes together so that a woman (Jeanne d'Alcy) appears to disappear, turn into a skeleton, and then reappears as part of his magic act. The film makes it rather obvious now, but back then, this film must have been shocking to original audiences who had nary a clue as to how the effect was accomplished. This editing technique would lead to other wide-spread use of editing film. **1/2 of 4 stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It Must Have Been a Thrill
Hitchcoc9 November 2017
The early cinema must have been so much fun for audiences. In this one, a magician brings out a woman, sits her down in a chair, throws a scarf over her, and she disappears. He again puts the scarf down and she transforms into a human skeleton. This little thing is a first in special effects. There are some moments that don't work, but all in all, it functions pretty well.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Now, if he'd made her CLOTHES disappear...
'Concealment of a Lady at the House of Robert-Houdin' is one of the early 'trick' films of Georges Méliès. In this case, his choice of trick is a questionable one, as here Méliès is merely reproducing (on film) a conjuror's illusion which Robert-Houdin and many other magicians had done live in their stage acts ... so, Méliès is using a camera trick to achieve what the conjurors achieved with stagecraft. Later, Méliès's better and more complicated trick films offered feats which could only be done via camera wizardry ... thus beating the stage illusionists at their own game.

An elegant corseted lady is seated in a chair on the stage. Méliès, dressed in evening attire, drapes a cloth over her, then whisks it away. Hey presto! The lady has been transformed into a skeleton.

For modern audiences, accustomed to 'Bewitched' and such, it's almost laughably obvious that Méliès achieves his effect with a simple jump cut. Unfortunately, Méliès's trickery is cruder and more obvious than it needed to be -- even by 1896 standards -- because the skeleton seated in the chair is about three inches taller than the woman it has replaced. I suspect that, even in 1896, audiences realised that Méliès had substituted the skeleton for the lady, rather than whisked away her clothing and her flesh to leave her own skeleton remaining.

This film's title may have been clear in the 19th century, but now wants some explanation. Robert-Houdin was a legendary French stage magician of the Victorian era. (As I write this, Michael Douglas is planning to star in 'Smoke and Mirrors', based on a true incident in Robert-Houdin's career.) Harry Houdini adapted his own stage name in honour of Robert-Houdin. As a boy, Georges Méliès attended performances of stage magic at Theatre Robert-Houdin, the magician's exhibition hall in Paris. After Robert-Houdin's death, the adult Méliès bought the magician's theatre and adapted it as the studio in which he filmed his trick movies. Quite conveniently, Theatre Robert-Houdin was already fitted with trap doors and other trickery which Méliès put to good use.

More for its historic value than for its entertainment value or the level of its conjuring, I'll rate this early film 8 out of 10.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Low quality makes it almost unwatchable
Horst_In_Translation12 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It seems another show full of magic and tricks by grandmaster Georges Méliès, but unfortunately the quality in this one is so low, even for 1896, that it's almost impossible to follow the action and see what's going on exactly. What I recognized among other things is that Méliès female assistant, Jeanne d'Alcy, looks like the one from the famous Marylin Monroe scene much much later on the eternal ventilator scene. Besides that, there seems to be a big magic tube and a lot of the appearing and disappearing magic action has to do with that. In any case these 75 seconds aren't really worth the watch in my opinion. Méliès has delivered far more convincing works, also including magic shows.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Alchemy of the illusion
luigicavaliere12 February 2019
The alchemy of the illusion derived from the vaudeville and the illusion' s theatre as Houdini' s theatre, that became Melies' studios. Meliès brings the illusion in the cinema, at the same time as Blackton , creating cinema of attraction.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Conjuring of a Woman at the House of Robert Houdin
nekrotikk1 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The vanishing lady must have been impressive when this short film was made, and the skeleton would almost certainly have scared viewers. I was left wondering if this would have been less impressive for anyone who had seen a stage magician perform this illusion though. This short film is just the one illusion and although it's interesting from a film history point of view, if you're watching it to see the illusion you might prefer to see a live stage magician or modern HD version of the illusion.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trick photography in film is invented?
selfhelpradio19 August 1999
Things happened fast in the first few years of film - less than a couple of years before, the Lumiere brothers showed their first film - workers leaving their factory, one minute's worth - at the Societe d'Encouragement a l'Industrie Nationale. In late 1896, George Melies made this film, which quite simply shows a woman changing into a skeleton & back again. He used stop action of course, which every kid with a video camera has done by now, but at the time it was sensational.

Melies made his name & fame with such camera tricks in the cinema's early days - but whether he was the first to do the stop-frame thing is contested, as an Englishman named G.A. Smith was experimenting with the same things at the same time.

I still think, though, this particular trick is kinda neat.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pretty freaking amazing, especially for 1896
williambendavis-933-21895820 December 2014
In all honesty my mouth dropped when I saw this. How in the hell do you manage to do what George Méliès did in freaking 1896? It is absolutely incredible and pretty damn cool! The short film is people doing illusions, making it appear that they made one another disappear then reappear in another place, or a guy jumping of something and when he hits the ground he turns into someone else. Sounds fairly routine by today's standards, but then you realize it was done in 1896 and your mind kind of melts. Huge props to George Méliès for creating this. He must have had a serious passion for film to put forth the amount of work and dedication something like this required.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Vanishing Lady showcases a primitive form of the substitution splice.
TheMovieDiorama28 July 2018
Méliès was first and foremost a magician. An illusionist who pushed the limits of film during the early 20th century to create spectacles. This silent short trick film experiments with an editing technique that seemingly makes a female individual disappear and then reappear, as if it was one take. The technical astuteness and methodical editing is what makes this one minute film intriguing. Méliès attempts to recapture a stage production through the medium of film, and does so with confidence. This simply exists to prove an editing concept. There is no story, limited acting and nothing memorable to elevate this trick film. So to call it a "movie" would be slightly obscure and tenuous. The inclusion of the skeletal remains does somewhat inject a fantastical element to the technique, but it's not enough to transpire the concept as it lacks creativity that he is infamous for. Raw, basic and unmemorable. The Vanishing Lady vanishes amongst Méliès' densely populated filmography, but remains an intriguing short to experiment with a simple editing technique. Paving the way for his future lengthier films that have made a mark in cinematic history.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not A Bad Early Short
Rainey-Dawn12 July 2019
The Conjuring of a Woman at the House of Robert Houdin AKA The Vanishing Lady.

This one gives an idea of they were practicing and paying with film at the time. Films were still new in 1896 so this was something amazing to watch back then I'm sure.

5/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extremely simplistic compared to later trick films, but nonetheless entertaining
Tornado_Sam22 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"The Vanishing Lady", numbered 70 in Méliès's Star Films Catalogue, is thus the renowned filmmaker's 70th film and already he's delving into trick photography. Previously, the great auteur had indeed created magic performances for camera long before the release of this film, as in "Conjuring" (1896, his second film), but for that short, no trick photography was used at all and was in truth merely a live performance rather than a showcase of special effects. This movie is often considered by many the director's first film to use editing, and indeed is probably so since the earlier shorts he had made were mostly the typical Lumière-based subjects of the time. That's not to say this is anything like "A Trip to the Moon"; on the contrary, it's very simplistic compared to later shorts and will feel all too light looking at what he produced in future years. Part of this is probably because it recreates a stage performance already performed in theater and thus feels limited in trickery. Another reason is probably because, considering the director would in the next few years keep making Lumière subjects between his special effect movies, he didn't yet realize all the crazy things he could produce using such an effect.

Running at just a minute, this act features Méliès himself starring in the role of a magician (typical if you keep watching his work) who makes a lady disappear by seating her on a chair and draping her with a blanket, before whisking it away to make her vanish. To bring her back, he gathers all his powers up to produce a skeleton and transforms the skeleton back into the lady the same way as in the beginning. They bow, the film ends. It's interesting to think if the skeleton bit was at all part of the original act in this way, considering the way it's conjured out of mid-air here would have been impossible to do in real life.

Even the edits in this movie aren't always seamless as in his later stuff. Apparently, and unlike "The Execution of Mary Stuart", this one uses three edits to create the illusion. Making the lady vanish in the first place is pretty rough since you can see part of her dress vanish into mid-air, and even Méliès himself seems to be waiting for her to vanish instead of just casually yanking it away. This is undoubtedly rather critical because of being the director's first trick film, but he would improve. As for the other two edits, they appear to be overall decently executed, so it is worthy of praise that he was able to get two out of three pulled off.

Another thing that's notable is that colorized prints of "The Vanishing Lady" were also sold. This puzzles me, because for the most part Méliès's movies were colored by Elisabeth Thuillier's shop in Paris by the hand-painting method, and she began work for him in early 1897 according to online sources. I suppose either somebody else did the hand-color work for him, or he had the prints colored by Thuillier the next year when he still had buyers of the movie. Unfortunately, none of the color prints survive today, as far as we know, so I hope to see Jacques Malthête's authentic recreation put online at some point. Because of the timelessness of the print we have, it's hard to imagine at all the way the scene would look colored.

While it's true "The Vanishing Lady" does become buried under the rest of the director's output, there is something that feels different about this illusion than others. Perhaps it is that it was a stage performance originally. Perhaps it's the history behind it. Either way, this is still quite an enjoyable film in its own right even if it feels simplistic compared to later shorts. Also, note that because Méliès performed this trick on the theater stage as well, at his Théâtre Robert-Houdin, it's obvious he knew how to sell the illusion with his joyful performance. This has to be the reason why he was always so energetic in his later films.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Vanishing Lady
Michael_Elliott28 March 2008
Vanishing Lady, The (1896)

*** (out of 4)

aka Escamotage de'une dame chez Robert-Houdin

A magician (played by Melies) brings a woman out on stage and makes her disappear and then he puts a skeleton in a chair and turns it back into the woman. This is a pretty entertaining little film, which shows various things that the director would go onto work with in the future. Of course, the magic scene has always been a big part of the director's career and the trick done here is very nice, although it's easy to spot the edit. The use of a skeleton would also be used countless times by the director in future films. The trick lasts just over a minute and will certainly keep a smile on your face.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed