Adventures of Tarzan (1921) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not a feature version but a compilation
castledrac3111 September 2022
Per historian Ed Hulse in the Film Detective blu-ray audio commentary, there was never a feature version of this title. It was originally a 15-chapter serial released during 1921-22, and was reissued in a 10-chapter version in 1928. The 65 minute version is actually a collection of odd reels from both releases (but not including chapter one) that a company compiled for video release in the 'eighties. As a result this version can't be judged as other than a sampling of what the original may have been.

Another reviewer unfairly castigates Lincoln's acting. Well, there really was no acting required other than to look strong. Lillian Worth, who plays Queen La of Opar, did deserve criticism since some of her histrionics are risible and of the type in lampoons of silent films.

Some of the animal handling is disturbing in a era before the ASPCA began monitoring animal cruelty in films. And some of the actor stunts and interaction with the lions looked very dangerous.

For Tarzan fans this is an interesting curiosity, and the complete serial has been discovered and due to be released on video.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very disappointing
JohnHowardReid3 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I would actually like to rate this one with a zero, but I'm giving it a "three" for its curiosity value. The movie has been missing for years, but thanks to good old Grapevine, it has now surfaced in its 1928 feature film cutdown version. Although this feature now runs only 60 minutes, I feel sure this glimpse will more than satisfy all Tarzan addicts. Alas, however, it will never be regarded as a long-lost "classic" again. Elmo Lincoln's performance as Tarzan is so bad and so off-centre, it has to be seen to be believed. Admittedly, he is hampered by a really weird, mind-boggling costume (which has been somewhat retouched for the poster so that it doesn't look half as ridiculous). His performance is best described as indifferent. Directors Robert F. Hill and Scott Sidney don't seem to be giving him any dramatic direction at all. In fact, it's a mystery what Hill and Sidney were doing. The other players are less clownish than Elmo Lincoln, but no-one would describe their contributions as good or even adequate. The camera-work is - to say the least - primitive. It doesn't budge one inch. Admittedly, the original tints - mostly green - have been preserved, but even this spectacle wears thin after 20 minutes or so. In all, "Adventures of Tarzan" is no long-lost masterpiece after all. It was just long-lost. I'm sure many disappointed viewers will feel it should have stayed that way!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed