The Sheik (1921) Poster

(1921)

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Fun in Valentino's desert
American_Delight8 July 2011
Lawrence loved Arabia and Meryl Streep fell for Africa, but Diana, the leading lady of "The Sheik," resists the desert with all her might. She reacts badly to Valentino at first, prefers to consort with Europeans, and threatens Arabs with a pistol she can barely shoot. As in every Hollywood romance, however, her heart eventually melts. Maybe this was an unexpected plot twist in 1921.

"The Sheik," will open the eyes of anybody who mistakenly believes that human history has been a steady march of ever increasing open-mindedness about sex. The 1920s were a more open, steamy time in film that the next couple of decades that followed it, which the "The Sheik" non-prudish storyline illustrates.

"The Sheik" is not quite exhilarating enough and is somewhat disappointing if you're looking for exotic passion or a home video for date night. But it succeeds as an early romantic comedy, and distinguishes itself from other silent era fare such as the mawkish humor of Chaplain, the historical bombast of "Birth of a Nation," and the serious reverence of "King of Kings." For romance between appealing leads in locations far from civilization as we know it, "Son of the Sheik" or even "Stagecoach" fifteen years later are better bets. Still, "The Sheik" is historically important and more fun than most films of the time.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Desert King
lugonian30 May 2011
THE SHEIK (Paramount, 1921), directed by George Melford, taken from the source material of Edith Maude Hull's daring novel, stars silent screen legend Rudolph Valentino (1895-1926) in one of his most acclaimed performances. Following the great success of THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE (Metro, 1921), it was his role of Ahmed Ben Hassan that elevated Valentino's status to popular leading man. Cast opposite Agnes Ayres, a name virtually forgotten among popular silent film stars, this is one for which she's best known solely due to the presence of Valentino, if not much else.

Starting off with a proverb (credited to Oliver Wendall Holmes), "Mohammed's land - where saint and sinner chant as one, their praise to Allah - bowing low beneath a desert sun" and subsequent inter-titles, "Allah is Allah - there is no God but Allah," before the story gets underway with the introduction of Ahmed Ben Hassan (Rudolph Valentino) a rich tribal prince "whose shoulders has fallen the heritage of leadership," choosing a maiden at the marriage market. Choosing Zilah (Ruth Miller), he returns her to Yousef (Charles Wagener), a tribal chieftain who loves her. Also there is an observant tourist, Diana Mayo (Agnes Ayres), an "orphaned daughter of an English poet," whose free spirited ways has her both refusing a marriage proposal from a young man ("marriage is captivity" she says), and going against the wishes of her brother, Sir Aubrey (Frank R. Butler), in favor of traveling through the Sahara desert alone with camel riding Arabs headed by Mustapha Ali (Charles Brindley), a tour guide. In Biskra, "gateway to the desert, city of adventure" Diana is insulted when refused admittance into a casino ("The Monte Carlo of the Sahara") that is, under Ben Hassan's rule, reserved only for Arabs. In protest, Diana enters, disguised as one of the slave girls. With her revealed white hands giving her away, Hassan escorts the phony slave girl out. Learning about her travels through the desert the following morning, Hassan abducts Diana against her will, keeping her captive in his palace tent. Unable to break away through the violent sand storm, she does make her escape from his camp only to be rescued by Hassan in time from the abduction by Omair (Walter Long) and his bandits. Learning that Raoul DeSaint Hubert (Adolphe Menjou), a famous French novelist and close friend of Hassan, is coming for a visit, Diana, fearing the humiliation of meeting "a man from her own world" to see her as the sheik's prisoner, is forced to act proper during his stay. It is Hubert who insists on Diana's freedom and return to Biskra. As Hassan agrees on releasing her, he discovers Diana gone, abducted by the rival tribe.

At first glance, THE SHEIK gives the impression of being a throwback from the Theda Bara era from the 1910s, ranging from Agnes Ayres overactive emotions to Valentino's suggestive eye gestures. After repeated viewing, it becomes acceptable in that manner, especially how everything comes together through its primitive acting style. Not exactly "The Sheik of Araby," Valentino's Sheik is educated, having acquired lasting friendship between Gaston, his valet (Lucien Littlefield) and noted poet (Adolphe Menjou) during his stay in Paris. His Hassan sings the Stephen Foster song, "Beautiful Dreamer" whenever happy and is seen smoking cigarettes in the process. For his cultural background perspective, he usually gets what he wants, especially the woman of his choice. The big moment occurs when he abducts one outside his race, the liberated English Diana who addresses him as a "desert savage bandit." This scene alone is one of its true highlights, especially for 1921. For those familiar with Adolphe Menjou (1890-1963), and his countless roles during the sound era, it's interesting finding him in a silent movie so early in his career. Very thin with unmistakable mustache trademark, he's almost unrecognizable through his advanced aging process with slightly white hair and heavy makeup over his eyelids.

As popular as THE SHEIK was back in the day, there never was a remake, only a sequel titled THE SON OF THE SHEIK (United Artists, 1926) that not only marked the turning point in Valentino's career, in a dual role of both father and son, but his final screen performance as well, having died shortly after its theatrical premiere. Had THE SHEIK been put under consideration as a remake in the 1930s, no doubt that Ricardo Cortez, who bears a near striking resemblance to Valentino, might have inherited the role, with my take on Kay Francis playing Diana Mayo. As legend has it, there's only one sheik, and that's Valentino. Interestingly, while THE SON OF THE SHEIK did have more exposure than its predecessor, ranging from television broadcasts and home video, THE SHEIK finally turned up on cable television's American Movie Classics where it frequently aired from 1990 to 1999. Former AMC host once commented during its April 9, 1990 premiere presentation of THE SHEIK as being the station's first silent film broadcast.

With several video distributions of THE SHEIK, two 1999 releases are worth noting: one from Paramount home video with the orchestral and chanting score by Roger Bellon, and other from Gravevine Video with agreeable piano scoring. The Paramount edition with Bellon score is most commonly available, and one used for both AMC and Turner Classic Movies (TCM premiere: July 5, 2011) broadcasts. On a personal level, Grapevine's piano scoring is appropriate and much more agreeable. Although no piano score credit is given, it's quite reminiscent to William Perry's style from his Killiam Collection in public television's "The Silent Years" series of the 1970s.

As silent movies go, THE SHEIK is actually quite entertaining. In other words, "campy" with unintentional humor, and one not to be taken seriously. How the story and Valentino's performance appeals to contemporary audiences simply "rests with Allah." (***)
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An essential period piece for film buffs
g_hawke21 January 2002
The Sheik. Like it or not it is part of film history and as such deserves at least a look. The plot is pure romance novel, the budget was microscopic and it's true about it not being Valentino's best film. In spite of all this, the film manages to be a neat bit of escapism.

No one expected this film to succeed in spite of being based on a wildly popular best seller. But the female film going population had other ideas and The Sheik made a mint, spawned many imitations and caused an Arabia craze.

The plot involves the lovesick Sheik Ahmed abducting an English beauty to be his wife. Clearly, this is not the sort of movie that would get released today except as a direct to video. Because of this, rather than in spite of, this movie is very fascinating to modern viewers.

The Sheik is strangely enjoyable if one puts aside modern inhibitions and gets into the spirit of things. Even with that, this is not a very well made movie, just a fun one. In spite of cries for censorship in the 20's, this movie is very tame by most modern standards. Nothing I would show a child, but most certainly not as wild as what is on an average network sitcom.

If you wish to check out the legendary Valentino, I suggest viewing The Eagle or the Son of the Sheik which feature much better performances.
22 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's a treasure.
angeley25 January 2009
I can't believe all the apologist critiques. The Sheik is so enjoyable, fun and Valentino is so warm and loving with his co-star, it is a must see! (Plus I love the music that comes with it)

Remember also Valentino at this time in his life, was newly and madly in love with the love of his life, Natasha and he is just radiant throughout this whole film. It's been said that he along with the rest of the cast and crew had the time of their lives romping through the desert making this film. It truly shows.

Valentino is gorgeous in this. I watch it periodically and it leaves the sweetest feeling with me. Go on about the subject matter, about the over emphasis on gestures (it's a silent film, that was the norm) but there is nothing better than to see this gifted and talented man act while he is probably at his most happiest in life.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rudy, Where'd You Get Those Eyes?
bsmith55521 December 2002
"The Sheik" was the movie that catapulted Rudolph Valentino to stardom. I just saw it recently for the first time. It holds up rather well within the context of its story.

The story involves London socialite Lady Diana Mayo (Agnes Ayres) setting off on an adventure across the desert. When her caravan is attacked by bandits and her brother (Frank Butler) killed, she is rescued by Sheik Ahmed Ben Hassen (Valentino, who carries her off to his camp intending to make her the latest of his many conquests. With the influence and advice from his friend Raoul (Adolph Menjou) the Sheik comes to respect her and they ultimately fall in love. But when she doubts his intentions, Lady Di runs off into the desert and is captured by Omair the Bandit (Walter Long). Rudy of course rides to the rescue and the lovers ride off into the desert to live happily ever after.

It is easy to see why the ladies swooned over Valentino. He did cut a dashing figure on the screen and his hypnotic stare was to become his trademark. Both Valentino and Ayres would reprise their roles in "Son of the Sheik" (1926), Valentino's final film.

Lucien Littlefield who plays Gaston the Sheik's valet, stuck around for many years. He wound up playing a variety of roles for Republic Pictures in "B" westerns. Menjou, who actually WAS young at one time had a long and prosperous career playing mature sophisticated gentlemen.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This kitschy orientalism romantic melodrama film hasn't aged well at all. It's a mixed bag that halfway, buried in the sands of time.
ironhorse_iv19 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Sheik, by modern standards is a controversial film that portray Arabs in the most unsettling light, by having the main characters dealt with the trade of "white sex slavery". In other words, it refers to the real-life sexual enslavement of white women by non-Europeans, as part of the Arab, Barbary and Ottoman slave trade routes. Directed by George Melford, and based on rather horrifying romantic novel written in 1919 by Edith Maude "E.M." Hull. It was the first of a series of novels she wrote with desert settings that set off a major revival of the "desert romance" genre of romantic fiction. Adapted to the screen by screenwriter, Monte M. Katterjohn, the film tells the story of Diana Mayo (Agnes Ayres), an independent, strong-willed young English noblewoman, whom undertakes a solo exploratory trip through the Sahara. Only to be kidnapped by Ahmed Ben Hassan (Rudolph Valentino), an Arab Sheik lusting for her. For the most part, the Sheik sees her, as nothing more than a sex slave; but after time, spending with her, he realize that he has fallen in love with the westerner; well as long, as she is willing to adapt to Arab culture and stop looking down on them. However, the bandit Omair (Walter Long) thinks otherwise of their union, and plans to ruin it for him, by capturing Diana for himself. Can the Sheik get her back? Watch the movie to find out! Without spoiling the movie, too much, I have to say, the film is a lot tamer than the novel. In the novel, Sheik Ahmed rapes Lady Diana multiply times, in order to make her, love him. Not only that, but he continues to physical and mentally torture her, until she snaps from PTSD, and falls in love with her captor. While, the 'Stockholm Syndrome' elements still existed within the film story; his abuse to her, is tone down, to a few scenes of him, demanding she dress like a woman. Even the rape is only suggested as a curtain closes on Sheik Ahmed and Lady Diana before there is any physical contact between the two. The film even cuts the suicide attempt by Diana from the novel. Another thing, the movie cut from the book is the sub-story of the Sheik's father, the Sheik's own fatherhood and his struggles to live with the consequences of his actions. This plot point is dropped in the movie, in which it is revealed that both of Ahmed's parents died after their guide abandoned them in the desert, and the fact, that his son hasn't been born yet. However, they did explore this issue in the sequel, 1926's 'The Son of the Sheik', which is often considered the superior film compare to the original. One thing, I didn't like about the film and the novel is when the Sheik's true heritage is reveal. It's definitely comes off as a white-washing cop-out, however, in 1919 it was unheard-of that a white man would rather be a 'savage' than a 'good' Englishman. Also, the talks about 'mixed' marriage, were somewhat ground-breaking. It somewhat reminds me of 1962's 'Lawrence in Arabia", for a bit, there. Anyways, 'The Sheik" was a surprised hit, at the time. It helped propel Rudolph Valentino to super-stardom. After all, Valentino was at the time, the greatest male attraction, often picture in exotic, adventurous romantic pictures. He was indeed a big hit for the ladies, because of his handsome, hot-blooded Italian-born nature. However, his screen premise wasn't like, by most men at the time, as his on screen persona and questioned his masculinity was often criticize as homoerotic. I guess, at the time, dancing and singing wasn't a thing, a man should do. Nevertheless, this man could dance, but he also somewhat sings. As prove on here, where he later, provide music like 'Kashmiri Song" & "The Sheik of Araby" for the film, when talkies became available. Since, the film has no sound when it first came out, performers had to show emotion through facial expressions and gestures. I do agree with some critics, that he wasn't the best actor to do that. Nonetheless, this film is probably the role he's best remembered for today, due to the fact that a brand of popular condoms was named after him, due to this role. In my opinion, I like him, better in 1921's 'The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse'. It's sad, that he died so early in his young life, from a perforated ulcer. He had so much more to give. The same with his co-star, Agnes Ayres who died from Cerebral hemorrhage at the age of 42. She really did shine in this role, despite her character, being portray more as a victim, rather than a heroine. Anyways, besides the alright acting. The movie is still worth watching for a film historian standard for its visuals. I love the use of yellow, brown and orange film tilt. It really does set the mood of the harsh environment of the desert. The action scenes are also worth-checking out. Surprising, the shoot-outs are still entertaining, despite being over 90 years old. Since, the movie is so old, it resulted, with the film, falling into public domain, meaning that virtually anyone could duplicate and sell a DVD copy of this. Therefore, many of the versions of this film available on the market are either severely or badly edited. Since many of them, come from extremely poor quality, having been duped from second- or third-generation copies. Don't count on the audio and film footage to be good. Not only that, but it had a lot of scratches, and discoloring in the film footage. So watch out for that. Overall: While, the Sheik hasn't aged well since it first came out, due to its rampant sexism and racism undertones. It's still not as savage and backwater, as some modern viewers make it out to be. So check it out, if you want to.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Where the new entertainment does not elbow with the old one
marcin_kukuczka18 November 2007
There are silents which still make many today's viewers overwhelmed, including productions on grand scale: the ones of stunning visuals and top notch performances. There are "lost" silents which have been a longstanding dream to see by many but the likelihood for finding them is constantly declining. There are also silents which were meant to entertain and they did serve their purpose in the distant past but do not do that any longer. They have simply failed to stand a test of time. Unfortunately, THE SHEIK, from my point of view, appears to direct towards the latest group but surely does not turn out to be "totally dated" or "unwatchable" Let me analyze the movie in more details.

The content is hardly convincing for today's cinema buffs, for the general audience. An English woman Diana Fayo (Agnes Ayres) badly desires freedom since she perceives male-female relation bounds as humiliating and marriage as captivity. She goes for a trip to the Arab city of Biskra hoping for freeing herself from the old bounds of dated tradition and humiliating dependence. Moreover, having met the powerful Sheik Ahmed Ben Hassan (Rudolph Valentino) whose slightest wish is law among his people, she takes a trip into the sun garden of the sand, the desert. However, what she is exposed to appears to be absolutely on the contrary to her expectations. She gets into a "more tragic captivity" where no one is likely to find her whereabouts. Sheik Ahmed, who was to be a liberator, is not accustomed to having his orders disobeyed and Diana is not accustomed to obeying orders. What can happen in such unwelcome circumstances?

Although the action is pretty unpredictable, today's viewers will not watch the movie for the sake of wondering what will happen. It does not absorb us as much as it absorbed the viewers in the 1920s. The visuals are also far from masterwork and some scenes are pretty boring and tedious. Therefore, we could easily say that THE SHEIK is too seriously dated. But many people would not agree with that opinion. What constitutes the movie's great success still today are the two CAST: one is a symbol, the other one is a beauty.

Rudolph Valentino just after his masterpiece, THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE which had premiered in March 1921 and which had introduced him to stardom, was cast in this movie of exotic title and exotic content. He is not a tango dancer nor a soldier for "foreign" France but a sheik. But this is far from his best performance and it is mostly based on pantomime and, from today's perspective, exaggerated mimics. Yet, the presence alone of the silent era symbol made this movie in 1921 and makes it even now in 2007 worth seeing. There must have been interest in this movie since a few years later a sequel THE SON OF THE SHEIK (1926) was made, being at the same time Rudolph's last film. The other person on whose shoulders lies the success of the film is beautiful Agnes Ayres. In fact, she does a much better job as Diana Fayo. She IS a desire incarnate for Valentino and occurs to be very subtle, beautiful, tender - a sort of woman every man would fight for.

"Pale hands I love,

Beside the Shalimar,

Where are you now,

Who lies beneath your spell"

Yes, the sheik is totally "bewitched" by Diana and Valentino appears to be in love with Ayres. However, there is no such powerful chemistry between the couple like in some other movies of the time. They do good jobs apart from each other.

To give you a deeply genuine opinion, I quite enjoyed THE SHEIK but if it had been my first silent, I would not be a silent buff now. What is more, if it had been my first Valentino movie, I would wonder how he could become such a great star. An average movie mostly for silent buffs when you are deeply in the silent era reality. 6/10
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
super-important historically--awfully silly to some if seen today
planktonrules28 April 2006
This movie is definitely a curio from the past. It was Rudolph Valentino's most famous movie and helped to make him, for a time, the most desired man across the globe. He was, in fact, the first true "male sex symbol" as a result of his performance in this movie. So, historically, it's a very important film. However, many seeing the film today will marvel at how poorly the film translates to modern audiences and sensibilities. First, the acting is overly dramatic--even for most silent films. Second, the sexy star might be seen by many today as a rapist--considering he kidnaps the lady and ultimately forces himself on her. But, despite this, it's still an entertaining if slight piece. I doubt, considering the sex symbols of the 21st century, Valentino will turn any of you on, but it still is interesting to see who grandma and great-grandma were panting over almost a century ago!

NOTE: Since I first posted this review, I have seen quite a few more films starring Valentino. And, overall, I think THE SHEIK is among his poorest films--though his most notable. Tastes do indeed change, as today it isn't all that great. Try seeing some of his other work--it definitely is an improvement in most cases.
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This famous film was largely a tease, an art at which Valentino was particularly proficient…
Nazi_Fighter_David31 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For reasons difficult for mere man to diagnose, the sheik represented the ultimate in masculine appeal… Call it the mystery of the burning sands, the magic lure of the tropics, the titillating uncertainty of the unfamiliar, the reputed animal magnetism of the Arab aristocrat—these are mere words which leave the cult of this particular sheik unexplained…

Give Valentino a burnoose, a bejeweled dagger and fancy belt, a pair of riding boots, a luxurious tent with intimations of a harem in the background and a well-cushioned couch in the foreground, and he became irresistible… To be borne in his arm on a white Arabian stallion, struggling virtuously but not too violently, was apparently the goal of nearly every woman's ambition…

Much of the action of "The Sheik" consisted of a menacing Valentino staring at a pleading Agnes Ayres while they warily circled each other in preparation for the clinch that was a long time coming…
26 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Romantic Arabia
gavin694225 July 2016
A charming Arabian sheik (Rudolph Valentino) becomes infatuated with an adventurous, modern-thinking Englishwoman and abducts her to his home in the Saharan desert.

On the one hand, this film is interesting in its depiction of "Arabia" because it was probably one of the first, and makes it a rather romantic setting. Today, we tend to think only of war and strife.

But also, this is no all-happy romance. In the novel, Sheik Ahmed sexually assaults Lady Diana; in the film, the assault is only suggested as a curtain closes on Sheik Ahmed and Lady Diana before there is any physical contact between the two, but this is still questionable subject matter for the time. George Melford said, "We have handled the frank scenes in 'The Sheik' so delicately that I think the censors will be the only disappointed reviewers." Today (2016), this film is probably the one that Rudolph Valentino is best known for, though more people probably know him for appearing in a lyric from "Manic Monday"!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Misrepresentation of Arabs
Ptipana22 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
To start with, the movie, from the beginning to the end, portrays Arabs as savages and uncivilized. And that only the Europeans are the civilized ones. And Arabs deal with women as objects, not human beings. And in the whole film, the only ones who felt sorry about the woman were the French novelist and the Sheik, who, at the end, was discovered to not be a barbaric Arab but rather to be a European civilized man. His mother was Spanish, and his father was an Englishman. That is why he didn't enjoy seeing the lady, Diana, suffer. Moreover, he couldn't sexually assault the woman, of course, because he wasn't an Arab, while for that barbaric Omair, who was presented as an Arab, the only thing that he wanted was to sexually assault Lady Diana. In addition, and here I quote, "My presence here! The humiliation of meeting a man from her own world!" In the movie, the quote means that the French novelist feels humiliated when Lady Diana, a woman from his own world, encounters a man in the story who is very different from their culture and is considered uncivilized. This quote highlights the theme of cultural differences and the character's discomfort with these differences. I know this movie is part of film history, but we must get rid of these stereotypes about Orientals.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Libido of Arabia
Spondonman31 December 2004
A significant milestone in movie history and therefore should be watched as such. Viewed only by today's standards it's pretty corny and contrived, chock full of insinuated or probably insulting stereotypes, and also suffered that most terrible of happenings: the sequel was much better!

I last saw it as a teenager in 1975; all I could remember of it was chuckling at the implied strength of Ahmed's tent withstanding the sandstorm. Or of course, Diana's iron will in withstanding Ahmed's potential sexual advances. But that was the discipline that came with being white - if he had been a true Arab, well ... As usual back then, Blood is thicker than education.

Seen again, it's a reasonably well produced romantic action film, which carries you along (if you let it) to the corny and contrived ending. I may sound a bit too sarcastic, but I assure all that I thoroughly enjoyed The Sheik and thus recommend it, only don't take it too seriously.

Was Menjou on a diet in '21? I don't remember him skinnier than in this!
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dated, campy, and far from timeless, but still decent overall
MissSimonetta20 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The Sheik is a film more famous for how it boosted the career of its leading star rather than how it works as an actual movie. It's often (mis)labeled as a classic (probably because many people assume "classic film"=anything made before 1980) and I was surprised to find it on the AFI's Top 100 Passions list. In truth, The Sheik is very weak and dated, sporting weak performances by its leads and a serious lack of the promised sex appeal.

Lady Diana Mayo (Agnes Ayres) is an independent young Englishwoman who has shocked her society peers by going on an excursion through the Sahara desert in the company of Arabs. She catches the attentions of a tribal prince, the sheik Ahmed Ben Hassan (Rudolph Valentino), who decides he wants her as his bride. He kidnaps her and holds her captive in his tent, where she resists his advances, but finds herself slowly falling for him in spite of herself.

Though the story is far from politically correct, that is not the reason why The Sheik fails. The plot is pure sexual fantasy. It's escapist melodrama and we are not to take it seriously, which is why my inner feminist is not too offended by the sadomasochistic romance. The film fails because it lacks the eroticism necessary to make the story effective. This is due to the performances of the film's leading stars. In Valentino's case, there is a want of subtlety; in Ayres', a want for passion.

Despite it being the most iconic role of the famous screen lover Rudolph Valentino, his performance isn't all that good. I normally love Valentino in his other films; he's no brilliant actor or anything, but he's not lacking in talent. Aside from being really good-looking, he has a charm and charisma that draw your eyes to him whenever he's on screen. His acting is restrained and, like the best silent screen actors, he expresses so much with his eyes. So when I see him mugging for the camera in The Sheik, all I can do is wonder what the hell went wrong. I don't know if it's the director's fault or if Rudy was having a bought of temporary insanity, but his broad performance is totally unlike him and just doesn't work. There's nothing remotely erotic about it.

Ayres doesn't give her character enough life or personality. We're made to assume that Diana is an independent and adventurous woman: early in the film, she turns down a suitor's proposal by saying that she regards marriage as prison; she's brave enough to go on a desert expedition without her brother there to protect her; and she's strong-willed enough to refuse the sheik's advances and orders. From what I just wrote, you'd expect a pretty fiery character wouldn't you? Well, Ayres' portrayal of Diana is anything but fiery. She's not very expressive, and looks confused and frightened for the majority of the film. Ayres also gives Diana little characterization, making her an independent woman in name only. She fails to bring any life to this strong-willed character, giving Diana no more than a pretty face with a vaguely defined personality.

If Diana being a free spirit is unbelievable, then even more unbelievable is her eventual love for Ahmed. The lack of chemistry between Valentino and Ayres is what kills the film. We're told over the story he gradually bends her to his will, but we're never shown such a development. For the majority of her captivity, Diana is repulsed and unresponsive to the sheik's love-making. There's not a sign of arousal or surrender whenever he steals a kiss or an embrace, no sign of her opinion of Ahmed slowly changing as time goes on. Then, all of a sudden she's completely fallen for him, worrying about his welfare and dreamily writing "I love you, Ahmed" in the sand!

That being said, The Sheik isn't all bad (I'd take it over sparkly vampires any day). It has a great deal of unintentional humor which makes it entertaining, and it's a good way to waste an hour and a half if you're bored. It's just no great classic or anything. And if you haven't gotten the chance to see Valentino in action, then go watch The Eagle or this film's sequel, The Son of the Sheik, both of which showcase his talent and sex appeal much better.

6/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Valentino's History
Michael_Elliott5 September 2010
Sheik, The (1921)

*** (out of 4)

Sheik Ahmed Ben Hassan (Rudolph Valentino) is accustom to having his wishes fulfilled by whoever he asks but he gets a challenge from an English woman (Agnes Ayres) who is more freewheeling and doesn't believe that a man owns a woman. The Sheik eventually kidnaps the woman, forcing her to his retreat in the desert where he slowly tries to force his will on her. This film has certainly become one of the landmarks of cinema as it created a brand new type of sex symbol and it forever made a legend out of star Valentino. It's strange because I really enjoyed this movie yet I really can't say why I did because there's so many negative things in the movie. For starters, you could easily call this movie both sexist and racist yet I guess no one in 1921 cared. I guess the woman who made this movie a hit didn't mind the fact that the Sheik was not only a kidnapper but also a rapist and an all around bad guy. I guess a little dark side didn't turn anyone off. I'm rather amazed at watching this film that it was such a hit and that women would drop head over hills for a man like the character here. I really don't know what it was but I guess Valentino managed to put a spell on the women in the crowd just like his character in the film. I will add that I've seen several Valentino pictures before and after them and the majority of them feature a better performance but I guess that really doesn't matter too much. I found Valentino here to be way over-the-top during certain scenes but this might be due to the rather poor direction. We have way too many silly shots of Valentino giving silly looks at the camera and it's easy to see why some critics attacked this film in 1921 because shots like these do make it come off campy. Valentino certainly knows how to play up the sex appeal but again, I'm still somewhat shocked this went over so well with women. Ayres isn't all that impressive as the female lead but we do get strong supporting performances by Adolphe Menjoy, Walter Long and Lucien Littlefield. I've read different reports of where the exteriors shots were actually filmed but wherever they were they do look terrific and add a lot to the film. The tints on the print I viewed also helped things quite a bit. I'm not sure what movie people in 2010 will make of this movie but I'm sure many would either laugh it off or be offended by it. I'm really not sure why it kept me entertained so but I had a pleasant time with the picture no matter how many flaws it did have.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Interesting Piece of Film History
Rainey-Dawn12 June 2016
The film really is interesting... has few exciting moments in it from chase scenes to the threat of murder. Also has some very romantic scenes that can easily have one swooning.

The story isn't all that bad and although today it seems standard or basic by today's films - it must have really been something else in it's time period! Story of two men that fall in-love with same woman and one of the men happens to be a sheik that takes the woman into his palace to keep her.

The film is also a good example of why women loved Valentino... he's very appealing in this movie.

7/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nostalgia that never dies.
capyslists18 March 2006
I read the book many years ago, and also read a biography on Rudolph Valentino. At last I have finally got to watch the film on DVD. To me it was a lesson in how not to do two things at the same time. To truly watch a silent movie you really can't be doing something else. Not a bad thing really. Seeing the facial expressions told the story as much as the lovely old script text, and piano music. I wonder if modern day actors and actresses could convey the story and how they are feeling today. I am sure that a lot of women would still "swoon" at Rudolph Valentino when he gives that magnetic smile, not to mention the men with the contrasting emotions of feisty to demure of Agnes Ayers. A good old fashioned romance with a happy ending, but like all films,never a clone of the book. Definitely worth viewing, if only for nostalgia's sake.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One remarkable Sheik
bkoganbing15 March 2017
One classic film not likely to be remade is Rudolph Valentino's The Sheik. The anti-feminist message of the story would not be looked at with favor by today's audience. Of course when talkies came around it was because no one could have played The Sheik with as much charisma as Valentino so recently departed.

Agnes Ayres is a rich British feminist type who has come to North Africa for a little desert solitude. She meets Valentino in town and he takes one look at her and he sees another trophy for the harem. He kidnaps here and at first she resists, but soon enough who could resist Valentino as millions of women across the country agreed.

To make this film acceptable to that all important southern market Valentino is a captive Caucasian who was raised by the sheik who did the kidnapping and who made him is heir. That miscegenation issue just wouldn't play well in Alabama.

Rudy was one remarkable sheik. He has a French valet in Lucien Littlefield and his best friend is French novelist Adolph Menjou who has some similar views on life and love.

As for his charisma, I don't think the cinema ever saw anything like the worship his fans had for Valentino. It comes through even with the attitudes that have radically changed for today.

If there was one role that forever gave Valentino his image it was that of The Sheik. Watch this and see why.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Historically important doesn't mean good
edchin200622 March 2008
Since roughly half the voters gave this a 10, I wonder why none of them cared to comment on the film. Question to those 10ers - If this is a 10, what do you give Douglas Fairbanks' "The Iron Mask" or his "The Three Musketeers"? 20's? What gives?

To all those not familiar with Silent Films - do NOT let this ranking fool you into believing that this is among the better Silents and lead you into dismissing this Genre! "Sunrise"(1927) has one of the most amazing tracking shot. "Der letzter Mann" aka "The Last Laugh" (1924) is an incisive glimpse into human character as is "Greed" (1924). Remember most of Chaplin's films were silent!

Also, I noted that more than half of those commenting (me included) rated this well below the median. Take a peek at the voting breakdown and notice the "bell curve". It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where 300 "extra" votes went.

As a period love story, this may be worth watching. To the 10ers - you should take in "Love Story" (1970).
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful Valentino Film
bowofdeath22 March 2015
This is not only the flagship of Valentino's film, capturing Valentino at his prime, it is the most beautifully photographed. The camera was stationary on the tripod for the filming of this jewel, so they could literally focus on everything else. The tinting added a hint of the time of day and visual contrast. By the time of The Son of Sheik ten years later, the cinematographer was expected to pan and move the camera and apparently this was so hard to do with the available equipment at the time that they lost control of the details of beautiful filming.

The inter-titles are also magnificent in this film.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Historical Importance of The Sheik
springfieldrental25 October 2021
One of the most noteworthy movies cited as personifying the spirit of the Jazz Age is November 1921's "The Sheik." Actor Rudolph Valentino's cheeky portrayal of a desert leader created film's first male sex symbol and had millions of female viewers swooning.

The movie--and the actor's--success had its roots in a very popular 1919 romantic novel, 'The Sheik,' by Edith Hull. Over the summer of 1921 Valentino had left his previous employer, Metro Pictures, for Paramount, who had secured the rights of the book. The studio immediately cast its newcomer for the lead. The tale of an Arab leader living in a large desert oasis who falls in love for a reluctant English adventuress trekking her way across the North African sands adds enough spice for even the prudish of viewers to salivate. The initial surprise of the film was how much of a misogynist Valentino's character, Sheik Ahmed Ben Hassan, was and how he teasingly treats his opposite, Lady Diana Mayo, played by Agnes Ayres, with utter disrespect. There's an evolution of sentiment to the Sheik, however, as the movie progresses. An exciting rescue sequence where the Lady is captured by an outlaw band, motivating the Sheik to gather his forces, ensues.

When "The Sheik" premiered in theaters around the country, the box office immediately rang with record receipts. The popularity of the book helped, but Valentino's star attraction from his earlier 'The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse' added to the demand. Despite production costs in upwards of $200,000, the movie garnered over $1 million in just the first year. One theater in France played the film 42 straight weeks. It was also the first Valentino movie to be shown in his native Italy.

The impact of "The Sheik" through the years is immense. It was the first 'desert' movie to be produced and has spawned several inspired films, such as 1955's 'Harum Scarum' with Elvis Presley, that draws from Valentino's portrayal. The term 'sheik' entered the English lexicon after its premier to mean a young man on the prowl. And "The Sheik" is listed #80 in American Film Institute's 100 Greatest Romantic Films as well as nominated in AFI's 100 Heart-Pounding Movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
not so hot, but it's Valentino
mukava9917 December 2008
Surprisingly, the best acting in this exotic melodrama comes from Agnes Ayres and Adolphe Menjou as the sheik's victim/lover and old friend, respectively. Valentino, although he had proved his abilities in Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and other films, indulges in too much eye popping and grimacing to convey lust for Ayres. Fortunately, these displays are toned down as the film unspools. As a story it's unoriginal, somewhat tedious and entirely predictable: devil-may-care British girl adventuring in the Sahara catches the eye of a local chieftain who kidnaps her, kisses her a couple of times, holds her prisoner until she yields to his desire – all in the most chaste fashion. The overheated and verbose novel on which the film is based is far racier than what is on screen. Yet still this film caused quite a stir back in the early twenties. It is sumptuously mounted with a large cast, well shot scenes of horsemanship and astoundingly realistic looking "desert" locations which were actually filmed on the beaches of Long Island! The photography and intertitle design are beautiful. But whether Valentino overacts or hits the mark, he is always worth watching.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still racy, escapist fun
pocca18 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is the sort of film that many viewers are made to feel sheepish about enjoying. Studies of Rudolph Valentino always take pains to point out that this is not a particularly strong film, and it must be said that Valentino as Sheik Ahmed does not do his best work here—for the first part of the film he uses very exaggerated facial expressions derived from pantomime that, as flamboyant on screen as he could be, he seldom used before or since. (I suspect that neither he nor the director George Melford expected The Sheik to become the sleeper hit it did—it was a routine studio picture based on a bestselling bodice ripper—and that Valentino was hamming it up.) And there is no denying that the story is very melodramatic, even kitschy. Yet, when all is said and done, I found this to be an engaging, well paced film from beginning to end (it may be campy, but it's never boring) and Valentino with his dark piercing eyes and clad in Hollwood's version of flowing Middle Eastern robes is very charismatic once he drops the mannered grimacing.

Ahmed's kidnapping and (possible) rape of Lady Diana are of course politically incorrect today, but going by comments I've read and heard these scenes still get a considerable number of women hot and bothered (women whom I'm sure have no problem distinguishing an on screen fantasy from the horrors of an actual assault). A modern audience, quite understandably, is also apt to be uncomfortable at the presentation of Arab men as hot blooded ravishers (as Ahmed points out to the French writer Raoul St. Hubert "when an Arab sees a woman he likes, he takes her"), but as stereotypes go it is very dated: considering that these days Arabs are more likely to be caricatured as sexually puritanical terrorists, the hyper-passionate Ahmed is positively quaint. Agnes Ayres may not be the most celebrated actress of the silent era, but she's certainly adequate here and her soft, rounded look give her the vulnerability this role requires.

A must see for Valentino fans (for better or worse this was his signature role), and probably fun for other viewers too.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Sheik
CinemaSerf12 September 2022
I was actually quite disappointed with this film. It has all the ingredients, all right, but somehow it just doesn't rise! Agnes Ayres is the feisty, determined "Lady Diana Mayo", a non-nonsense British aristocrat who visits Algeria where she meets the eponymous "Sheik Ahmed". She isn't much bothered about him, either way, but he falls hook, line and sinker and secrets her away to his oasis home. She rejects his, to be fair, rather kindly and indulgent advances and wants no truck with his desert ways and traditions (and, in her mind, the humiliation of being his chattel, however well intentioned he may have been). In the best traditions of an Hollywood love story, though, you can guess how their relationship eventually pans out - and when the bandit "Omair" (Walter Long) does some kidnapping of his own, the scene is set for an action-packed (albeit brief) denouement. It is definitely a film that, now in it's centenary year, has a beauty to it. The cinematography is almost perfect and the impact of the photography - especially of Valentino, who does way more flirting with the audience than Ayres does - is spellbinding. The flaw? Well, the story really does plod along. The sands of the desert took as long to form as the plot; and after a while beautiful people and horses need a purpose - and, in my view, it's all too late in coming. It took over $3m at the box office, a phenomenal sum for 1921, and that is partly testament to the star and the topic, but I wonder how many other people it disappointed at the time, too...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I expected an oasis, I saw a mirage...
ElMaruecan8224 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Every once in a while, I experience a movie such as "The Life of David Gale" or "Slumdog Millionaire", enjoyable for the most part and then at three or four minutes away from the ending, it goes downhill. I didn't expect such a similar reaction from a movie of the early 20s but movies like "Way Down East" or "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" taught me not to underestimate early silent movies. So regarding the star-making and defining role of Rudolph Valentino, my disappointment was proportional to my anticipations.

And don't get me wrong, I had quite realistic expectations: I knew Valentino would be as believable an Arab Sheik as John Wayne a Mongol Chief. I also expected the portrayal of Arabs as slave-trading and women-shaming people, submissive and/or barbarian, at the far end of the Western spectrum of civilization. But there's something about the Sahara or the Arabic Orient as settings: they're no Venice or Paris, they're so antithetic to the traditional notion of romance that they became reversely romantic like an exit for lost souls, an oasis in an existential desert setting the tone of a passionate romance, worthy of its inclusion in the AFI's Top 100 Passions.

And when you have as a female lead a noble adventurous Englishwoman, Lady Diana Mayo (Agnes Aryes), in quest for thrills and who just rejected her beau's proposal and Sheikh Ahmed Ben Hassan who can have any woman with a snap of his fingers, you know only a fiery and irrational passion can grow from such contradicting parameters. And from what I read about the original novel, written by E.M. Hull, the romance started with the most abject and objectionable aspects: rape. It's weird to know that such romances, much more written by female, could explore such dark realms to make a romance out of them, but the novel also made a feminist point through a woman who could surrender to violence but would never never trade her dignity.

So the film toned down the rough material but as far as Arabs were concerned, it codified many tropes, and not the nicer ones. We get the sheikh as an egomaniac spoiled tyrant, lusting over white women, surrounded by knife-wielding bodyguards and dancing gazelles in a harem, a not so flattering portrait. But "The Sheikh" is a romance and a drama that can't indulge too long for "Looney Tunes" or "Popeye" cartoons' caricature though it wasn't much the portrayal of Arabs that shocked me, after all, while I'm writing this, Saudi Arabia is tarnished by a scandal involving an ethically challenged sheikh-type leader. No, ironically, the most unbelievable thing was Valentino as a Sheik, which doesn't diminish his performance.

I can see how this film launched his reputation as a sex symbol, there was something electrifying in his wide-eyed looks, channeling a weird Johnny Depp-esque feel, his awkwardness and effeminate charm while belonging to a supposedly ruthless breed of men create the most disorienting effect, accentuated by the fact that the other actors, especially Adolphe Menjou, don't overact. I guess that could make up for exotic charm not to be taken for granted, Mayo doesn't fall in love immediately and the film has the premise of a "Romeo and Juliet" with the Stockholm syndrome narrative of "Beauty and the Beast". It's weird but fascinating at the same time, and we can feel that only passion would blossom from such contradictions.

The sexual tension is palpable to a disturbing level, Ahmed wants to possess Diana but because she doesn't give herself too easily (like an Arab woman), his ego is hurt, his desire to possess her despite a "no" turns into a wish to attenuate her resistance. It's a real clash of civilization that is sadly relevant today in terms of gender-issues, but Hull's controversial take was that women might appreciate the "Oriental touch". That's how much fantasy was projected into that adventurous romance and that's what I love in movies: contradictions rooted in the depths of our complex psyche, showing people as Barbarians while conceding that it's got a charm of its own. Talk about values dissonance!

Retrospectively, "The Sheikh", like the Arabian Nights has spread a few positive stereotypes emphasized by the slow redemption of Sheikh Ahmed and his heroism when Diana becomes a more traditional damsel-in-distress figure. So the film reminded me of the last movie I reviewed: "The Dictator", for all the negative depiction of Arabs, the character was so sympathetic he made the film immune to anti-Arab accusation. So did Sheikh Ahmed who was the romantic lead after all but then at the end, we learn he's half English, half Spanish. There's not one ounce of Arabic DNA in him. And the more I dig into that revelation, the more disturbing it is.

Since it had no weight whatsoever in the romance, or in the plot, was it a nod to viewers or critics, as a way to make the love story more acceptable? Or was it a way to justify his lack of brutality because he had 'civilized' blood? When the only sympathetic Arab character isn't even Arab, the milk turns rapidly sour. And it goes the other way around too, if the rape from the novel wasn't toned down, would have the revelation been kept? In Hull's novel, the Sheikh's behavior was explained by his hatred toward Englishwomen because of what his father did to his mother, which spoke something about the universality of violence and bad behavior.

But George Melford went for the easy way: let's make Arab look bad, though not too bad for the Sheikh... but that's only because he's not an Arab. And that's how the film goes from "Romeo and Juliet" to "Beauty and Beast" only to end in a vulgar "soap opera" tone. Was I disappointed? I admit the film has historical significance in the way it inspired oriental romances such as "Morocco", "Algiers", "La Bandera" or "The English Patient", but so much for the intercultural bonding!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed