The Iron Horse (1924) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Forgotten Classic, rediscovered.
ironhorse_iv8 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
One of greatest John Ford's film, I have ever saw. This epic-scale silent western was hugely influential on outdoor films that followed it due to its large production. The Iron Horse was a massive production that employed over 6,000 people; two temporary cities were built to accommodate them, with 100 cooks on hand to serve meals. The project of Fox was the response to the film The Covered Wagon (1923), the Paramount, which was a huge box office hit draw. Shot on location in Arizona in Monument Valley. John Ford love the location so much due to its romantic scenery, that he film most of his westerns there after this. Surprising this movie wasn't directed by John Ford himself, but Kevin Brownlow and David Gill, but you can truly see Ford's influence in the film. The film is about Davy Brandon (George O'Brien) who follows his father's dream that the entire North American continent will be linked by railroad East to West. However, to make this dream a reality, a clear trail must be found through the Rocky Mountains. However, the trial is dangerous with Indians raids, led by a white man name Peter Jesson or Two fingers (Cyril Chadwick). In some versions he is known as Bauman or Deroux, but its Jesson's first right. Trust me. He is named 'Two fingers' due to the lack of fingers on his right hand. Chadwick really had only two fingers on the one hand having lost the others in a mining accident before he became an actor. When legislation signed by President Abraham Lincoln has made it an official mandate. Davy is hired on as a railroad surveyor by Thomas Marsh (Will R. Walling), the father of his childhood sweetheart Miriam (Madge Bellamy). While Davy hopes to win Miriam's heart, he discover that Miriam is already married and shocked to discover her husband is Peter Jesson, now working with the railroad as a civil engineer. As the Union Pacific crew presses on to their historic meeting at Promitory Point, Davy must find a way to earn Miriam's love and uncover Peter's murderous past. The Iron Horse has become one of the biggest successes of Fox, in the era of silent films. The film overall theme is the rebirth of a nation, by its unification physical and symbolic, after the terrible Civil War that divided the country. The film presents an idealized symbol image of the construction of the American first transcontinental railroad. It culminates with the scene of driving of the golden spike at Promontory Summit on May 10, 1869. A historical real life date. There is a note in the title before this scene that the two original locomotives from 1869 event are used in the film, although this is false - both engines (Union Pacific No. 119 and Central Jupiter) were scrapped before 1910. Still, it's pretty close to what it must have felt to be there witnessing East meeting West. The movie nearly mirrors the ending to Union Pacific (1939). I can't help wondering how many times C. B. DeMille watched the Indian attack on the train before he borrowed many elements from it to use in Union Pacific? I think this movie influence that later film. Still, I can do without the title cards telling us that we are watching a film, or how they film it. It took me out of the film, a bit since it's pretty much telling you, don't get too into the film, it's just a bunch of actors acting. It's breaks like that, that detract the audience from the real story and action. Come on, you don't need that. Make the film seems like it's really happening. The film had some very interesting characters/ I love the unabashed masculine chivalry and heroism by the hero, Davy. Despite the oddly wild air swinging badly done fight scenes. I love the loving, strong-willed, independent women as seem in Miriam. It's odd seeing an old film where women are shooting guns and going to battle. The supporting comedic characters were also funny. You get a bit of the Victor Mclaglen and Ward Bond lovable misfits that permeated Ford's later films in Sgt. Slattery and Cpl. Casey. You get a really funny part in similar scenes such as the dentist, getting the guys to join the fight by having a stampede, and a lot of weird Irish jokes. The action was well-done. It was just as good as any modern film. There are two versions of this film. John Ford used two negative, simultaneously, which was a common practice at the time. One was for use in the United States that runs for 149 minutes and the other for other countries which 133 minute runtime. The international has a lot secondary takes and other shots unused in the editing room just to note. Still, the movie goes a little too long after the Indian battle in the American version. The International version is more tightly edited. Many years the only copy that was shown was the international version. For years, the American version wasn't available for viewing. All early Fox Films original negatives were destroyed in a fire in 1937 until it was found. The negative American original, was restored in 2007 and a new musical background was commissioned and now both can be seen. The score is likewise very good. Just wish, we could had heard the traditional tune of the railroad songs like 'Drill Ye Tarrier, Drill". There is a black & white version, Hand-coloring and a tan brown version. Watch the tan version, it looks like a dusty Western, indeed. Unless you are a silent film enthusiast or an aficionado of Westerns then you are probably unfamiliar with this movie so check it out. Overall I am very happy to have this in my collection
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Man vs obstacles n the backbreaking hardwork but with the blood of the poor farmers.
Fella_shibby22 October 2018
This film was on my radar for a long time. Saw this few days back on a dvd. Fortunately it was a US version of 2 hours 29 mins but was a lil upset when I heard about the bluray release date set for November. I enjoy watching western films on blurays. This film is an epic about the creation of the first transcontinental railroad. The film portrayed the backbreaking hardwork, the toils of the men and the determination. George O'Brien plays the young man whose father was murdered for finding a shorter route through a gorge. O'Brien is adamant to fulfil his father's dream inspite of obstruction n a murder attempt. I was shocked to know that many poor farmers' land was usurped for the project n this was one of the reason for turning the James brothers into outlaws.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spanning The Continent
bkoganbing16 November 2010
Previous to directing The Iron Horse, John Ford had been known as the director of a few dozen B westerns, most of them probably lost by now and most of them starring Harry Carey. In getting the assignment for The Iron Horse, Ford got his first really big budget to work with from Fox Films. The end result was a film which along with Paramount's The Covered Wagon became the models for the big epic westerns. And it launched a whole new career for John Ford that netted four Oscars as a Best Director, though not one of them was for a western.

The story of The Iron Horse begins here in Springfield, Illinois where the children of Will Walling a contractor and surveyor James Gordon are playing while their fathers are meeting with none other than Abraham Lincoln at that time just a state legislator. Both would like to see a transcontinental railroad and Gordon is going to make good on it by going west and surveying the best route through the Rocky Mountains. But out west the surveyor is killed by hostile Indians led by a white man with only two fingers on his right hand. But the boy hides and is missed and grows up to be frontiersman George O'Brien.

Twenty years later in the midst of the great Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln signs the legislation authorizing the building of such a railroad though the real work doesn't start until the war is over. By that time Will Walling is working on building the Union Pacific and his daughter has grown up to be Madge Bellamy. She's engaged to Cyril Chadwick another surveyor, but Chadwick has some mixed loyalties.

Those of you who saw the epic DeMille production Union Pacific will recognize from this point some of the same plot situations. No doubt Cecil B. DeMille borrowed quite a bit from The Iron Horse, but I will say DeMille wrecked his train during the Indian attack and it was a beauty. But Ford with all the extras involved could say that his was to use the cliché, a cast of thousands.

The real evil villain here just as Brian Donlevy was in Union Pacific is Fred Kohler. He's behind a lot of the scheming as he's a large landowner where the Cheyenne Indians seem to function as a personal army. Now that was a bit much to swallow. As was the fact that when the grown up George O'Brien first makes his appearance he is identified as a Pony Express rider. Everyone knows that the Pony Express was a year long phenomenon that the Civil War closed down and the telegraph and railroad put out of business permanently. But Ford was also interested in the poetry of the west rather than the facts.

Still the action of The Iron Horse holds up remarkably well today and the careers of both John Ford and George O'Brien were made with this film.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the great, early Westerns, still recommendable.
FilmFlaneur3 August 2002
The Iron Horse was both Ford's 50th film and one of the most important silent Westerns. Until the 29-year-old director came to work on this epic project, he had gradually built up an expertise and standing with a number of smaller productions, many of them oaters, few of which survive today. This 1924 film consolidated his talent and gave him a creative reputation which lasted until he was deemed 'old fashioned' at the start of 1950s.

It's a story that characteristically combines the grand with the intimate, through a celebration of the coming of progress. The Iron Horse's narrative covers such issues as the Civil War, Lincoln's presidency, the Indian wars, Buffalo Bill, Wild Bill Hickok, ethnic relationships, cattle trailing and railway history in a span of little over two hours - all with an absence of narrative strain still impressive today. Ford's skill in marshalling many disparate elements into one large canvas, successfully orchestrating history (proudly announced here as 'accurate and faithful in every particular') is one example why he was such an exemplary Western director.

George O'Brien plays Davy Brandon, whose father dreams of rails eventually crossing the continent. After setting out for the west, Brandon senior is killed by the evil Two Fingers (Fred Kohler). Years later Davy sets to work for Union Pacific, scouting for a short cut through Cheyenne territory that will ensure the success of the transcontinental link up. Aiming to prevent this are the dastardly forces of corrupt surveyor Jesson (Peter Chadwick) and half-breed Baumann (Kohler). Meanwhile, Davy discovers his childhood sweetheart Miriam (Madge Bellamy) is engaged to the disreputable Jesson. The rest, as they say, is history.

Throughout Ford's career he was wont to use symbols to indicate the coming of progress in the West. In My Darling Clementine (1946) it was the social dance at the unfinished church. In Liberty Valance (1964) the desert flowers on Tom Doniphon's (Wayne's) coffin. The Iron Horse is dedicated to George Stevenson and, not unexpectedly, here it is the railway itself that represents the growth of civilisation. Its ultimate success as an enterprise is less that of a profitable commercial venture than of beneficial ideal, as visualised by President Lincoln.

Amidst the idealism of railway expansion, Ford includes the broad comedy common to many of his films - the Irish and Italian labourers continuing a friendly rivalry. Their work songs, spelt out in caption cards while they construct the track, punctuate the action, creating convenient breathing spaces between more dramatic scenes. The 'three musketeers' - as Slattery (Francis Powers) Casey (Farrell Macdonald) and Schultz (Jim Welch) are called - have their own amusing scenes based around some frontier dentistry. But essentially they function as a kind of comic chorus, their earthy, ethnic interjections keeping the film's idealism down to earth. There's an element of this too in Judge Haller (James Marcus), a Roy Bean character, whose dispensation of frontier justice is as arbitrary as it is often inspired.

Least convincing to the modern viewer is the character of Miriam, whose simpering virginity comes closest to the two-dimensional women found often in the world of D.W. Griffith's melodramas. Her condemnation of the clean living Davy's visit to the saloon, immediately after being with her (where, ironically, he has gone to patch things up with Jesson) seems almost wilfully annoying; ludicrous even, given the rough environment in which she finds herself. But that her heart belongs to the muscular scout is never in doubt, a fact made clear by their rapport in the opening scenes set in their childhood. In addition, once she has gained womanhood, her pending relationship with Jesson is condemned by implication as President Lincoln looks askance at their match. The same dramatic shorthand is employed through the palpable tension when Davy and Baumann first meet, an impending confrontation telegraphed as sharply as any message sent by mechanical means.

There is also a intense psychological antipathy between Davy and Jesson, notably in the standout barroom scene. In these moments O'Brien plays well, almost making one forget Ford's great films with Wayne to come. But, by necessity, this is principally a film of the great outdoors where Ford excels in portraying man battling against external obstacles, rather than facing internal stress. In his Stagecoach (1938), which was to later revitalise the genre, it would be a different story, one of comparative intimacy. Here, the heroes and villains who react together along the railroad work out their differences in the open air with grand gestures, fisticuffs and work songs, rather than anguished conversation. And it is these epic scenes that remain in the mind when the film is done. The attack of the Indians on the supply train, their furious shadows thrown against the sides of the carriages; the snow swept work camps; the many panoramas of frontier life; Davy and Bauman's final conflict in the sleeper 'house'; the final meeting at Promontory Point for the 'wedding of the rails', and so on.

Such visual grandness does not preclude economy however. One only has to think of hurriedly arranged burial of 'the old soak' and the marriage held at North Platte, or the establishing scenes at the beginning of the film, to see how Ford was fully in command of his material, switching scale and focus with ease.

With the joining of the two railroads and the closing of the bond between Miriam and Davy, there is a natural conclusion to both the human, and the mechanical elements of the story - Davy actually waits until the final spike has been driven home before committing himself to her side. Thematically, Fritz Lang was to acknowledge a debt to Ford's classic in his Western Union (1938), which has a related story, but his film is the slighter of the two and less innocent. Ford's epic remains the definitive telling of these particular events and its authenticity can still be recommended today.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Epic silent movie...
dwpollar27 October 2013
1st watched 10/25/2013 -- 7 out of 10(Dir-John Ford): Epic silent movie about the path to the completion of the transcontinental railroad seen thru the eyes of the son of a dream-filled mid-westerner, played by George O'Brien in adulthood. This movie does a pretty good job of portraying the conflicts in the effort -- while throwing in some romance with a few fist fights. John Ford, the King of the Western, directed this early movie and is not afraid to show men having emotion and being aggressive as males are expected to be. George's character, Dave Brandon, travels with his father to the west in search of helping the railroad get built, but his father is killed by a white man dressed as an Indian and traveling with their tribe. This man becomes the evil character in the film an we find out he also is tight with the railroad executives and owns a lot of land. We believe his intention is to make sure the railroad goes thru his areas so they will thrive and make him money although it is not really dramatized. This piece is somewhat historical in nature with some comedy, romance and violence thrown in coming a lot from the romantic triangle between Brandon, his childhood girlfriend and her new fiancé. The fight scenes are a little corny and sometimes un-necessary but some of the emotions come out due to this and help the film, in my opinion. Ford makes the film entertaining and not just a bland documentary which it could have been. His ability to entertain an audience shines and the film also teaches which is a positive thing as well. Overall -- a worthwhile film although not perfect.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
John Ford's First Epic Look At American West
Ron Oliver13 December 2000
A young boy grows to fulfill his murdered father's vision of seeing THE IRON HORSE, the mighty transcontinental railway, stitch the country together, binding East to West.

Bursting with excitement & patriotic fervor, THE IRON HORSE is the film which put young director John Ford on the cinematic map. He brought together all he had learned from years of making shorter, smaller films and he produced a product which heralded his enormous contributions to sound films in the years to come. This is a `director's picture' in that the stars, as good as they are, are almost negligible; what was important here was Ford's vision & his ability to place it before the audience. Indeed, he does not even bring his leading man (George O'Brien) on screen until 45 minutes into the story - a shortcut to disaster almost anywhere else.

(In all fairness it should be noted that O'Brien, handsome & strong-limbed, does very well as the gentle hero. He would find similar roles in other epic films of the decade. J. Farrell MacDonald, as Irish Corporal Casey, is the prototype for many comically eccentric fellows who would appear in other Ford westerns.)

The film often takes on the aspects of an ancient newsreel. Cattle drives, Indian attacks & endless track laying all look utterly real. Particularly fascinating is the depiction of the dismantlement of the end-of-the-track town, so that not even a dog is left, as it is moved many miles further on to the west. This type of arcane information is what makes watching very old films so enjoyable.

THE IRON HORSE represented the largest migration out of Hollywood for location shooting up to that time. Nothing like this had been attempted before, so Ford & his lieutenants were forced to make up the rules as they went along.

Hiring a circus train, the small army of extras arrived at the subzero Nevada location in January of 1924. The conditions which greeted them were authentically primitive. It was so cold, the extras quickly began sleeping in their costumes. Finding the train to be flea ridden, they moved into the sets and began living exactly as the characters they were portraying. The female extras especially suffered from the rugged conditions. A frontier mindset seemed to take over many of the cast & crew; the circus tent, which doubled as both the movie saloon and the crew's commissary, eventually had to have the catsup bottles removed from the tables to discourage the many fights which kept breaking out.

Authenticity found its way into the movie in other, more positive, ways. Several of the elderly Chinese extras, representing laborers on the Central Pacific, had actually worked on the real McCoy sixty years previous. They came out of retirement to appear in the film & enjoyed themselves immensely. Ford also managed to locate the two original locomotives which met at Promontory Point, Utah, in 1869 and reunited them for the film's climax.

Composer John Lanchbery has contributed a splendid soundtrack to the restored video version, incorporating several contemporaneous tunes of the period. It would be intriguing to double bill THE IRON HORSE with Cecil B. DeMille's UNION PACIFIC (1939), which tells the same historical story, but with a completely different tack & set of fictional characters.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Patriotic Early western
Teebs212 June 2005
Very early John Ford western, don't bother looking for John Wayne here! "The Iron Horse" tells the story of the building of the railroad across America from the East to West coasts. Of course this is a movie so we also get a romance plot, a vengeance plot, hostile Indians, corrupt officials, jovial Irishmen, nasty Indians and so forth.

Although the tone of the film is mostly pretty patriotic and upbeat, there are several darker moments that hint at the corruption and greed in business as landowners attempt to influence the route of the railroad with bribes of women and money. Sergio Leone's "Once Upon a Time in the West" amongst many other later Westerns takes this theme further. Much of the work is done by Chinese immigrants, but they all seem pretty cheerful here!

In many areas the film is inevitably dated, particularly it's comic scenes and the aforementioned treatment of racial stereotypes. There are a few landscape shots and action scenes, but none as stunning or exciting as in Ford's slightly later "Stagecoach". The 2 hour plus running time is also a little too much. However, the film does succeed in creating an overwhelming sense of achievement in the creation of the railroad, although the sense that 'Civilisation' may actually be a threat, developed in later Westerns, is already apparent with the saloon that doubles as a court of law, and a drunken judge.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Where East Meets West
lugonian8 October 2005
THE IRON HORSE (Fox, 1924), directed by John Ford, is an story set during the middle of the 19th century America about the building of the first Transcontinental Railroad. One of the very best examples of a lavish scale western produced during the silent era, said to be the answer to Paramount's earlier production of THE COVERED WAGON (1923), but most importantly, the first major project for Ford after nearly a decade in the director's chair to now gain the recognition he truly deserves.

The story opens with a prologue set in Springfield, Ill., 1853, revolving around Davy Brandon, first as a youngster (Winston Miller) with deep affection towards Miriam Marsh (Peggy Cartwright), his childhood sweetheart. Davy's father (James Gordon) is a surveyor who dreams about the crossing of the western wilderness, while Miriam's father, Thomas Marsh (William Walling), is a skeptic. However, one of the citizens, Abraham Lincoln (Charles Edward Bull), believes in this man's theory and knows he'll accomplish his means. Setting out to accompany his father on a mission to survey an appropriate route through the mountains for the coming railroad, Davy bids a tearful farewell to Miriam. During their westward journey, Davy, who is hidden away because of foreseen danger, witnesses the brutal killing of his father by a white man dressed up as an Indian whose only identification if the loss of a thumb and two fingers on his right hand. After burying his father, Davy is taken in by a passing scouting party. A decade later, 1862, Abraham Lincoln is president of the United States; Davy (George O'Brien) is a Pony Express rider out to fulfill his father's dream leading into the building of the Transcontinental Railroad; and Miriam (Madge Bellamy), now engaged to Peter Jesson (Cyril Chadwick), an Eastern surveyor working for her father actually working for Deroux (Fred Kohler), the richest landowner, who stands to profit if the railroad goes through instead of through the pass. After being reunited with Miriam, Jesson finds himself in stiff competition. The two men become bitter enemies, especially after Jesson's attempts in doing away with him. Matters become complex until the golden spike gets hammered into the rail on that historic day of 1869 as east meets west through the continental railroad.

In the supporting cast are Gladys Hulett (Ruby); Jack O'Brien (Dinny); three musketeer pals of J. Farrell MacDonald (Corporal Casey); Francis Powers (Sergeant Slattery); and James Welch (Private Schultz), as well as historical figures of Buffalo Bill Cody, Wild Bill Hickock and John Hay enacted by George Wagner, John Padjan and Stanhope Wheatcroft.

THE IRON HORSE (title indicating the locomotive train) plays like a D.W. Griffith production with prologue, historical figures, flashbacks and epilogue, and like a screen adaptation to an Edna Ferber novel telling its story through the passage of time, along with soap-opera ingredients (complicated love triangle), but no usual conclusions of central characters going through the white hair and wrinkles aging process. Overall, this is John Ford's storytelling, cliché as it may be, placing fictional characters against historic setting, along with the oft-told murder-mystery subplot of a son out to avenge his father's killer, a historical movie that's become an important part of cinema history. Ford, the future four time Academy Award winning director, with a handful of motion pictures to his credit, best known for westerns, would provide similar themes in his future film-making. As popular as THE IRON HORSE was back in 1924, it's amazing that Ford didn't attempt doing a remake, especially in 1939 when westerns reached it peak of popularity. It took Cecil B. DeMille to attempt a similar story with UNION PACIFIC (Paramount, 1939) starring Barbara Stanwyck and Joel McCrea. Like THE IRON HORSE, UNION PACIFIC, which tells its story in over two hours, features villains, Indian massacres and thousands of extras.

George O'Brien, a rugged actor, was an ideal choice for the role of Davy Brandon. Although he worked under Ford's direction numerous times in latter years, and showed his capability as a dramatic actor in F.W. Murnau's SUNRISE (1927), he never achieved major stardom. He did work steadily mostly in "B" westerns through the early 1950s. Co-star Madge Bellamy offers her typical heroine performance, caught between two men who vie for her affection, but is far from being a strong character. While the acting overall is satisfactory, from today's viewpoint, some heavy melodramatics as the method of fainting by youngster Davy after witnessing his father's massacre, or Bellamy's performance in general, might provoke some laughter. Scenes such as these can be overlooked by great location scenery as Monument Valley, a race against time and action scenes typically found in Ford westerns.

Television history to THE IRON HORSE began when it became one of the movies from the Paul Killiam collection to air on public television's 13-week series of "The Silent Years" (June-September 1975), hosted by Lillian Gish. In her profile about THE IRON HORSE (accompanied by an excellent piano score by William Perry), Gish talks about its location shooting in the Nevada desert, the use of 100 cooks to feed the huge cast, and 5,000 extras consisting of 3,000 railway workers, 1,000 Chinese laborers, many horses and steers. Decades later, THE IRON HORSE made it to the American Movie Classics (1997-1999) and Turner Classic Movies (TCM premiere December 9, 2007 ) accompanied by orchestral score with 15 minutes of additional footage as opposed to the 119 minutes presented on both "The Silent Years," and the Western Channel in 2001. Distributed to home video Critic's Choice in 1997, availability on DVD came a decade later.

THE IRON HORSE may not be historically accurate as promised through its opening inter-titles, but it's sure an ambitious John Ford production to still be entertaining today. (****)
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
There seems to be a lot of confusion about various DVD versions . . .
pixrox117 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
. . . of THE IRON HORSE. The "Blow the Man Down"-incorporating musical score is NOT from the 1974 NOR from the 1995 releases mentioned here, but from Christopher Caliendo's composition recorded from June 28 to July 1, 2007, for the Fox 2-disc DVD release of that year, which includes the U.S. IRON HORSE permutation on Disc One, as well as the 17-minutes-shorter International IRON HORSE on Disc Two (along with a few "Bonus Features," one of which is a nine-minute piece about Caliendo's music for THE IRON HORSE). Naturally, I'm reviewing (and rating) the briefer HORSE, as director Ford always fluffed out his flicks with a half hour or two of extraneous "padding," and even THIS rendering of HORSE could stand to lose ANOTHER 20 or 30 minutes. The Transcontinental Railroad was America's "Moon Shot" of the 1800s. (Think about it: In 1961, President Kennedy ordered the Moon Shot, got gunned down a few years later, but men were on the Moon by 1969; similarly, in 1861 President Lincoln ordered the cross-country Choo Choo, got gunned down a few years later, but the track was finished in 1869.) Ford concocts a bogus lovers' spat here that delays the railroad completion by at least a year--this is as crazy as someone fabricating a flick in which a female stalker pulls up some adult diapers to race across the U.S. and wrestle her crush Neil Armstrong off the Apollo 11 Launching Pad!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Impressive Silent Epic Western
claudio_carvalho16 May 2010
In Springfield, the surveyor Brandon dreams on building the first transcontinental railroad while his skeptical friend Thomas Marsh (Will Walling), who is a small constructor, believes he is nothing but a dreamer chasing a rainbow; their children Davy Brandon and Miriam Marsh are best friends. Brandon heads with Davy to the west, where he finds a possible pass for the railroad. However, a group of Cheyenne led by a white renegade kills and scalps Brandon; Davy, who is hidden, sees that the killer has only two fingers in his right hand. In June 1862, President Abraham Lincoln (Charles Edward Bull) authorizes the construction of two railroads: the Union Pacific from Omaha, Nebraska, to West; and the Central Pacific, from Sacramento, California, to East. His old friend Thomas Marsh is responsible for the construction of the Union Pacific and his daughter Miriam (Madge Bellamy) is engaged of his engineer Jesson (Cyril Chadwick). After many incidents during the construction, Thomas Marsh is short of money and he needs to find a shortcut other than the original route through Smoky River. However, the powerful Bauman (Fred Kohler) that owns the lands where the railroad should pass, bribes Jesson to keep the original route. When the grown-up Davy (George O'Brien) appears in the town bringing the mail, Miriam is glad in meeting him and he tells to Thomas that his father had discovered a pass through the Black Hills. Thomas assigns Jesson to ride with Davy to check the ravine, but Bauman convinces the engineer to kill the rival. Jesson cuts the rope that Davy is using to descent to the pass; returns to town and tells that Davy had an accident and died. However, when Davy returns to town, he discloses the truth and the situation of the engineer becomes unbearable. The desperate Bauman uses the two fingered renegade to convince the Cheyenne to war against the workers and Davy has the chance to meet the killer of his father. On 10 May 1869, the locomotives 116 and Jupiter meets each other in the intersection of the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific.

"The Iron Horse" is indeed an impressive silent epic western of John Ford. Of course this western is flawed, with excessive patriotism, subplots and running time of 150 minutes. But considering the limited and primitive technical resources in 1924, it is amazing how the director could have made, for example, the scene of the stampede or the Cheyenne attack. Further, there are unusual angles of camera and the take from below the train arriving to save the workers is sensational in the prime cinema that used huge cameras. The plot seems to be based on the true story of the two North-American transcontinental railroads and the lead story of Davy, Miriam and her father is engaging. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Cavalo de Ferro" ("Iron Horse")
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Long Working on the Railroad
wes-connors15 December 2007
"The Iron Horse" is the first trans-American railway system; the story of its construction is told in this film. Chief among the other plot lines is the love story featuring hero George O'Brien (as Davy Brandon) and heroine Madge Bellamy (as Miriam Marsh). Villainous Cyril Chadwick (as Peter Jesson) comes between them. Will Mr. O'Brien and Ms. Bellamy come together? Will the Central Pacific railroad and the Union Pacific railroad hook up? Only time will tell…

This film takes a long, long time to pick up steam. Star O'Brien (and many regular cast members) appear only after a prolonged prologue. Some of the supporting cast are dispensable, like the unfunny "three musketeers". Fortunately, "The Iron Horse" is expertly directed by John Ford; and, lead actor O'Brien is very appealing.

****** The Iron Horse (8/28/24) John Ford ~ George O'Brien, Madge Bellamy, Charles Edward Bull, Cyril Chadwick
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent (if old) western railroad movie
bigdinosaur11 May 2005
Since I live in Cheyenne, WY this type of movie really appeals to me. As all historians know, various towns along the route of this railroad (which coincides quite closely to interstate 80 in Wyoming) were made during its construction. Cheyenne and Rock Springs (because of its coal mining) were especially notable.

I had seen this movie several years ago and was delighted to see it being broadcast on the Turner Classic Movies channel. Perhaps they will re-broadcast it again in the future.

This movie, while not completely accurate historically, certainly gives an idea of the magnitude of the endeavor being undertaken. And it does feature a real locomotive which operated on the railroad during the period portrayed. Historical buffs definitely should not be swayed from enjoying this title simply because it may not strictly conform to history.

I won't go into the story except to say that the various sub-plots keep the viewer very entertained. This was a very well-done movie in my opinion. Acting was very good. And the cinematography was very impressive.

Fans of either westerns or silent-era films certainly should not miss this one.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
John Ford's well done tribute to pioneering railroad workers...
Doylenf10 December 2007
THE IRON HORSE is a plot heavy western with what appears to be an authentic historical background, well photographed in crisp B&W photography that is not as primitive as one might expect from a film made in 1924. It bustles with excitement whenever any action scenes are taking place, accompanied by a "silent" music score that actually fits the story and never becomes tiresome.

GEORGE O'BRIEN has the lead but doesn't enter the film until at least fifty minutes is taken up with a prologue involving old Abe Lincoln himself and the friendship of two children who are soon separated but destined to meet again midway through the story when they're adults. The girl is played as a young woman by MADGE BELLAMY. She and O'Brien become romantically attached although she's now the fiancé of one of the villains of the piece. There's also a subplot involving the man who killed O'Brien's father, Bauman (FRED KOHLER), who is a white man joining the Indians for attacks on the "iron horse".

Some of the acting is strictly silent film technique and there's the usual John Ford inclusion of comedy relief from actors like J. FARRELL MacDONALD, long stretches of captioned "talk" for scenes that run too long with exposition, but decent work from O'Brien and Bellamy as the leads.

It's pioneering in the Ford mold, obviously a film that employed a huge cast to portray the building of the Union Pacific railway to the west, telling a fictional story of romance and danger with authority.

Worth viewing, although at two hours and ten minutes it can sometimes try your patience. All the hard work that went into the making of the film is evident throughout.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Belongs To The Ages
slokes17 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
John Ford's breakthrough Western epic blazed a trail for one of American cinema's major figures, so I really wanted to like it. But this is a film less about history than it is history, a dusty collection of tropes and sentimentality that falls well short of Ford's timeless standard.

The movie opens in Springfield, Illinois, where we see a man puffing at his pipe as he looks off in the distance. "Having another of your day dreams about rails across the continent?" his neighbor laughs expositionally. Eventually the dreamer is killed by Cheyenne, but not before finding a deep cut in a mountain range that will simplify the building of a national railroad. It's up to his son to see his father's dream become reality.

Silent films don't age equally well. Horror films and comedies hold their value, even improving in some instances. Period dramas and mysteries that require a fair amount of talking to move the plot, on the other hand, often do not. Silent films are great at establishing mood, but often struggle at meaning.

"Iron Horse" is a good example. Because you can't hear people talking, you need their expressions to tip you off on what's going on. Some silent directors struck a good balance; Ford here doesn't. The opening Springfield section is full of over-emoting, whether it's the scoffing neighbor or the icky tears of a lovestruck girl. One creepy tall guy stares intensely at two children for minutes on end, but it's okay because he's not a perv but our 16th president, just a log-cabin lawyer here but one who shares the dreams of an express to California.

Poor Abe never had any luck with theatrical presentations. Here he seems to be trotted out as Ford's seal of approval, a leaden figure who moves through the early story like Christ in a Passion Play. The film also has two dedications to Lincoln, and a bas-relief image of the man superimposed between them. I admire the man enormously, but enough already.

As an epic Western, "The Iron Horse" gets as much spectacle in as possible. This includes some memorable shots. One I often see in Ford and western retrospectives is of sunlit boxcars suddenly being darkened by the shadows of Indian warriors. Ford also uses perspective to great advantage, like a slight overhead of a Pony Express rider being chased by Indians, or a buffalo herd stampeding into frame.

That buffalo herd is part of the problem, too. It's very loosely connected to the rest of the movie, a bit of explanation about how rail-building crews were fed. Otherwise, you need it as much as a cattle run glimpsed later in the film or the seduction of a character we already know is going to turn out bad. Ford liked to futz around in his movies with various ancillary tangents, but there's something about a silent that makes such an approach very slow viewing.

The best thing in the movie by far is star George O'Brien, playing Davy, the son of the dreamer all grown up. When he finally arrives in the 45th or 55th minute (depending on whether you are watching the European or longer American version), he provides a natural, affable presence the movie sorely lacks. Before he comes riding in, you are stuck between the eyelash-batting heroine Miriam (Madge Bellamy) and the eyebrow-cocking comic relief of Casey (J. Farrell MacDonald), representing two poles of very bad acting.

The central problem with the movie is how ridiculous its story is. The DVD cover quotes Leonard Maltin approvingly: "This movie invented what later became clichés." Without getting into spoilers, I ask you to ponder the real identity of the lead villain, or the goofy way the heroine decides to hold it against Davy for exposing her fiancé as a lying heel. "You promised me and you've broken - your word" she tells him, whereupon he bows his head mutely.

If it was a sound film, he could have chewed her ear off making a case for himself. What you are stuck with here instead is an insipid and uninvolving melodrama relieved occasionally by a cool gun battle or a nice horizon line. "Iron Horse" shows Ford starting out with little more than a good eye and a taste for grand spectacle still somewhat beyond his powers to corral.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Important Film for Ford and Fox
Michael_Elliott29 November 2010
Iron Horse, The (1924)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

John Ford's first epic was a massive production for Fox who pretty much spent a ton of money hoping that the film would bring people in, which it eventually did. The film made a ton of money for Fox but more important it took Ford out of the gutters of "B" Westerns and made him a director to be reckoned with. The film tells the "true" story of the first transcontinental railroad as Davy Brandon (George O'Brien) tries to fulfill the dreams of his father who was killed by Indians years earlier. Davy must also try to win the heart of a former love (Madge Bellamy) while fighting off a man who wants to see the railroad fail. There's no question that Ford and Fox pretty much threw everything into this film and you can tell because it's story is all over the place. While I think the film isn't nearly as good as its reputation you still can't help but be impressed by many of the visuals. According to legend there were over 6000 people employed on the production with most of them being extras to give all the scenes a more epic look. I'd believe this legend because the scenery is downright beautiful to look at and there's no question that it has the look of a mammoth epic. The highlight for me were all the scenes where we see the railroad being built as the boards are placed and railings hammered down. There were many future films that dealt with the railroad but I must say this one here makes it look the most realistic. We get many other great action scenes including countless fights with the Indians where once again you can see the large scale with the amount of people, horses and of course stunt men. I think what really hurts the film is the fact that it really doesn't tell a clear story. I'm not sure if the film originally ran much longer but the 135-minute running time feels way too long but the reason for this is that so much happens and often times it doesn't really connect together. Instead of telling one full story, it seems the screenplay bounces all over the place and tries to tell as much as possible. One minute we're dealing with the railroad and then we jump to some town being built up. One moment we're dealing with the Indians but the next moment we're worried about the dress Bellamy is going to wear. It feels as if we're just getting countless vignettes pieced together without much need to bring everything together. Perhaps Fox was going for a Cecil B. DeMille type epic but this here didn't fully work. The film starts off saying that the history is true but that's clearly not the case as there are certain historic figures used in the film that had no place in the original events (like Buffalo Bill). Both O'Brien and Bellamy are good in their roles as are Cyril Chadwick, George Waggner, Will Walling and Charles Edward Bull who plays President Lincoln. THE IRON HORSE is certainly worth watching once for its importance to film history and while there are many impressive moments on the whole I think the film comes up a tad bit short.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hard to dislike
B1gBut25 January 2024
I've been going back and forth between The Iron Horse and The Thief of bagdad comparing them not because they have much in common but because they're both epic's i really like and admit aren't nearly as good as their reputation would suggest.

What's interesting to me in this comparison is that they suffer from mutually exclusive problems typical for the films of the period (both came out in 1924) and they could've learned a lot from one another.

The sets in thief of bagdad, like many films of the time (even those praised for their set design) have this fake "cardboard box" look.you know, the flat walls and pillars, the plastic steels and swords, the curtain ocean, not to mention motionless monsters held up by easily observable wires. Realism doesn't matter but you should maintain some level of believability and having walls so flat and smooth you'd think they're cleaned by razors, next to normal actors doesn't work like it'd If everything was flat like in an animation.

Why The Iron Horse is such an achievement is exactly because it maintains an extremely high level of believability and realism for the whole duration (other than the first 15 minutes). It's hard to doubt anything in the film when just watching people make railroads is so enjoyable and believable even when you should be doubting what's happening.

What it suffers from is the structure and pacing of the story, once you stop feeling immersed and think about the story, you realize it's filled with irrelevant stuff (the Lincoln scenes would be an easy example) and when the film ends, you might have some appreciation for the history and the labor of workers that connected east and west but you'll have none for the characters, the romance, the revenge subplot and ... that just take you out of the experience.

On the hand in The thief of bagdad, watching fairbanks' character alone is a joy. The film is filled with interesting cultures and curios with a story so tight i couldn't believe it was around 160 minutes when i first watched it. The film simply provides a descent story with effective storytelling while still providing enough for the viewer to appreciate the history of Baghdad as well.

I've also noticed that it seems like the older the picture, the more knowledgeable it is about other cultures, there are many things in this film, even in the title cards, that show the creators actually researched/knew about the setting and that they at least looked up some arabic/persian books. This might sound counterintuitive in the age of "diversity" and "inclusion" but what i've seen is that the diverse characters of modern films are only diverse cosmetically, they don't actually possess diverse identities (cultures,beliefs,ideologies,religions) that older films include.

In conclusion, I'd recommend both of these for those interested in history, even hollywood history but i don't see how others would enjoy them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great movie
joan_freyer20 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I just got to see this and it is a great movie! Classic John Ford! I won't repeat what the other reviews say but rather add some things not pointed out by others: The barroom fight scene is amazing. The crowd hold up lanterns to illuminate the brawl and this creates an amazing effect. The crowd surround the two men fighting so you can't see much of the fight which adds to the realism. Only a very confident director would 'hide' a vicious fist fight inside a crowd scene. The effect makes the fight appear to be viciously real. The voice over implied that Ford goaded George O'Brien, a real life navy boxer, into really fighting the double for the villain ( the double is never shown face front in the fight).

The final fight scene and shoot out is also very impressive in it's realism. Ford adds nice touches like the wounded man smoking calmly during the fight and one of the Indians falling to his death with his dog coming up to sit by his dead Indian master. Ford's ability to add tiny details adds to every scene.

Most of the scenes are shot in snow and one blizzard and you can often see the breath of the actors in a scene. It must have been very cold but the effects build up and add to the realism that this was filmed in the winter and not the summer.

This is a great film and shows John Ford already a master of his game. Everyone should see it and not be freaked out that it is a silent. The music is fantastic and you forget it is a silent. In a silent the visuals rule rather than words anyway and Ford would tear pages of script away. He did not need words.

J E F
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This Unfair and Unbalanced Fox Film . . .
oscaralbert15 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
. . . is to History what Today's Fox "News" is to Truth: A Bald-faced Lie! IRON HORSE comes from vastly over-rated director Jack Ford, a Confederate Red Commie Nazi sympathizer who won a record number of "Best Director" Golden Doodads simply because the Elections always have been rigged by the Billionaire Hollywood Plutocrats (which also is why Disney and MGM cleaned up on "Best Animated Shorts" Gelded Statuettes year-after-year during the Golden Age of Looney Tunes). IRON HORSE's "hero" Dave Brandon rides for the Pony Express nearly a decade after its historical demise, Bozo Ford moves the Union Pacific Railhead West, then East Willy-Nilly (with a random bride and groom achieving 21st Century Japanese Bullet Train Speeds by tooling along on the crooked 1868 rails from North Platte to Cheyenne in less than "10 hours"!), and Ford-the-Clown fabricates a Great Cheyenne Two-Fingered War Chief whose day job is spending 99% of his time being an actual WHITE MAN holding a land monopoly on the Sacred Black Hills Burial Grounds of the Sioux Tribe! This entirely Racist depiction of self-deprecating Asian and militarily idiotic Native Americans, along with MGM's GONE WITH THE WIND and hundreds of other Ford, Fox, and MGM Crimes against the Truth perpetuated "Jim Crow" Racism another 50 years in the Deplorable U.S. Red States, resulting in Hate Crimes, Dylan Roof-style Lynchings, and despicable Tweets from Game-Show-Host-in-Chief Rump even to this day!
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Rated 10 for technical accuracy in railroading history
wcrypto28 May 2006
Having at one time been the Southern Pacific Trainmaster for the territory of the eastern half of the predecessor Central Pacific, I have done extensive research on the old CPRR, between Montello NV and Lovelock NV.

Although not a "railfan" nor a "steam fan", I am an amateur historian.

John Ford's work in "The Iron Horse" was absolutely brilliant. He brought to the screen the real feeling of genuineness with the way the original "Chinaman's railroad" (as many local historians called it) was constructed, to the screen with absolute realism.

My father and his brother were working for Universal at the time this was made.

I'm a real fan of John Ford, and would rank this among his "most technically correct" film accomplishments, and I know that he always strove for realism.

Walter J Gould
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"By superhuman effort and undaunted courage"
Steffi_P22 December 2008
In the mid-1920s cinema saw the second coming of the epic, the first having been in the mid-1910s, and giants of the era such as Douglas Fairbanks and Cecil B. DeMille were continually upping the ante on each other with bigger and bigger pictures. Meanwhile the Western had been in gradual development, and by now it was only logical that this ever-popular genre was itself given a massiveness makeover. Paramount had the first stab with The Covered Wagon in 1923, and the following year Fox responded with The Iron Horse.

The Western itself of course went through many developments in theme, and can be grouped into different phases. The Iron Horse, along with Covered Wagon, Three Bad Men (1926) and The Big Trail (1930) belongs squarely to the "pioneer" Westerns which dominate this era. In these pictures the west would typically be an unclaimed wilderness, and the heroes were those who explored, settled and developed it. By now the genuine old west was fading from living memory, and so now we had the first generation for whom it could be a romanticised piece of history. Plus of course there is the fact that the wagon trails, railroads and cattle drives of the pioneer Western were ideal for the aforementioned fashion for epic pictures.

Today of course The Iron Horse is best remembered for its director – a young John Ford. Even back then Ford had a close association with the Western, although to some extent his style is still in development here. His shot composition relies heavily on very distinctive framing devices such as tree branches or posts, and sometimes the shots look a little cluttered. Also, his approach to the romantic love scenes is entirely conventional – with close-ups, rhyming angles and sparse backgrounds so as to focus on the actors. The older (more cynical?) John Ford tended to shoot these moments rather flatly, the camera hanging back, and even throwing in distracting background business.

On the other hand, and perhaps in ways that matter more, this is very much the same John Ford of Stagecoach, Fort Apache and so forth. In particular is his vision of the west. Right from the opening scenes he contrasts the smallness of the homestead with the romantic allure of the wilderness – framing the actors tightly in the opening shots, and then cutting to point-of-view shots of the trail. He always captures the vastness of the outdoors, and yet without ever dwarfing the people in it. Particularly impressive (and this is perhaps where Ford's greatest strength lay) is his ability to combine different storytelling elements in a single shot – for example at one point we see a mother mourn her son at his grave in the foreground, while a heavily loaded train passes through in the background.

Another typically Fordian element is the precedence he gives to the comic relief characters. On location they were largely working without a script, so Ford could spin their scenes out as long as he wanted. As with many of his later pictures, charming though it is, the comedy business threatens to unbalance the real story. We can also see in "Drill ye terriers" a forerunner to the group singsong that is a staple of even the earliest John Ford talkies.

A nod to the actors is also due. This was George O'Brien's first lead role and he doesn't do badly, considering he got the part mainly for being a good-looking newcomer who could ride a horse. He doesn't emote too convincingly, but he moves well which is the most important thing for a picture like this. The other standout is J. Farrell MacDonald, who played the kind of roles for Ford in the silent era that would later be filled by Victor McLaglan in the talkies – basically a comical Irish drunk. But like McLaglan he hid real dramatic talent under the act, and he emerges as the most genuine player in this piece.

Ford's confidence and passion for the genre make the Iron Horse a classic, but it's worth remembering that The Iron Horse is also a triumph of post-production. Cast and crew had gone on location without a complete shooting script and large chunks of it are more or less improvised. As well as directing Ford took one of his earliest credits of producer and, would thus have been able to continue supervising the product after shooting was over. It's hard to imagine what any other producer or editor would have made of the footage he brought back from location. It's unlikely they would have kept so much of the comic diversions and "oirishness", and it's perhaps with The Iron Horse that we have - for better or for worse - the earliest example of an unbridled John Ford.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Iron Horse:The U.S. Cut.
morrison-dylan-fan25 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Shortly after I had finished watching my first ever silent film (Alfred Hitchcok's last ever silent film:The Manxman)I found out that before he started his legendary partnership with John Wayne,director John Ford had earlier in his long career, made some very epic silent film westerns.

With having read up some interesting things that Leonard Maltin has said about the film,and discovering that the U.S. cut of the film had a total running time of 149 minutes (about an hour longer than the Hitchcock film)

The plot:

President Abraham Lincoln announces that with the Cival War having torn America in two,he is going to try everything he possibly can to connect both parts back together.One of his main plans to binned America back together,is to build the first ever Railway system,so people can at last have the chance to travel from one part of the country,to the other.

Two people,that take Lincoln's "wild" idea to heart are a father and son.During a camping trip,the father shows his son (Davy Brandon) the perfect spot for railway lines to be placed,with the area also being a "short cut",that would cut around 200 miles for the train journey's.Suddenly an angry group of Indians appear,that are strangely being led by a white man,(who only has two fingers on his right hand) appear.Getting hold of Davy's dad,the white Indian beats him up,until he is dead.After all of them at last disappear,Davy comes out of hiding,to bury his father.

Years later:

Congress finally give Lincoln's wild idea the opportunity to become a reality,although they also give very strict rules on the amount of time (2 years) that the railway system can have to reach completion.

With there being lots of cash on offer for the building of the system,contractors (in particular,one called Bauman,who also owns a good amount of the land,which would be left untouched,if the "short cut" that Davy and his dad discovered years ago was used.)rush round to get their hands on the cash and the contracts,whilst also making sure to never mention the infamous "short cut" to anyone in Congress.

After a money train is robbed which contained all of the workers rages,the very under-paid workers go on strike until their wages are sorted.With no one having any ideas on how to gather up the cash needed for the workers wages,everyone is left completely startled,when a man called Davy Brandon appears from out of no where,to tell people about a short cut he found with his dad in his childhood,which if used,would cut a huge amount of time and cost for the building of the railway.

As news of this "terrifying" announcement by Brandon begins to reach the ears of the main landowner and the contractors, (one of whom,strangely has only two fingers on his right hand!)they all begin to think of ways that will guarantee them,that they will never see Davy Brandon alive again..

View on the film:

When I first found out,that the plot for this two and a half hour silent epic western was going to be about the creation of the first railway system in the United States,my initial uncertainties about the film perhaps turning into a very drawn out history lesson,were thankfully proved wrong.

For his impressively well-paced screenplay,writer Charles Kenyon, (who is also credited for coming up with the story for the film,along with John Russell)smartly separates the story into several 20 minute sections,with each part of the film showing the very different reaction and effect that the building of the system has on people,from the investors who see the opportunity to drain a huge cash cow dry,to "the loner" Davy Brandon,who sees the new binding of the north and the south as something that his dad would have loved to help reconnect,with his extremely useful knowledges of the area.

During my viewing of this fantastic film,one of the main things that kept my ears wide open was the new enchanting score by Christopher Caliendo,who has written a gripping score with a great mix of instruments that give the film a fantastic "fresh" feel,whilst always complimenting the action/or the drama that is taking place in the movie.Even though a few moments that feature early in the film strangely look as if they have been taken from some cheap stock footage,director John Ford shows here that he has an amazing eye,for the wide-open west,whilst also knowing when to slow down and to focus on some beautifully reflected moments.

As I started to catch my breath from the gripping final battle,where an adult Davey Brandon finally gets revenge for his fathers murder,I began to realise that the main moment in the film that was stuck in my head,was the scene where a young Davey (stunningly played by Winston Miller) has to bury his father.Although the out line of the scene seems ripe to be turned into a melo-dramatic moment in the movie,Ford instead turns the scene into a delicate melancholy moment,which lingers long after the films thrilling final battle.

Final view on the film:

An extremely entertaining epic silent western,with an unexpectedly fast paced screenplay,a great,fragile performance from Winston Miller and brilliant directing from John Ford.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
S'alright!
gazzo-221 October 1999
I remember seeing this, done with a real blue tint if I remember right. J. Farrell McDonald was fun-the bald guy who looks like William Frawley? He shows up as a bartender in John Ford's lator 'My Darling Clementine' '46, pretty much looking the same way.

This was pure '20's Western stuff-having Buffalo Bill AND Wild Bill together(can't tell'em apart here well either...), and Indian attack or three, Lincoln on hand for Americana, some good stuff with buffalo hunting and etc.

George O'brien as the hero is alright too. He went on to play the same kinds of rolls as Tim Holt and Bob Steele did for ages.

This holds up well, is kind of long but involving, and NO, the music score is NOT hokey or out of place. Worked real well the two times I have sat through this film, actually.

*** outta ****, a semi-forgetten classic.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ford's first great western
utgard1417 July 2017
John Ford's silent western about the building of the transcontinental railroad. It's the movie that put Ford on the map, so to speak, and helped pave the way for many epic westerns to follow. George O'Brien stars as a man who works to realize his father's dream of a railroad that connects east to west. Between this and fighting Indians, he barely finds time to romance Madge Bellamy. It's a beautiful-looking film, with a praiseworthy amount of work put into it. My favorite scenes were all related to the trains and railroad construction. The effort to make these scenes are realistic as possible is very impressive. The scope of it all, with the history, the great scenery, the thousands of extras, the wonderful action scenes -- it's just a damn fine piece of work from a director who would become one of the all-time greats. Really that road for Ford starts here. One final note: Winston Miller, the child actor who played the younger version of O'Brien's character, would go on to become a screenwriter and producer. One of the scripts he co-wrote was John Ford's classic My Darling Clementine.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why isn't this better known?
barbb19532 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to know where to start with a review of this film, because it has so many different elements woven together expertly in interlocking layers.

Suffice to say that in the closing scene (not a spoiler as we already know what happened at Promontory Point), a bunch of big-wigs (Leland Stanford, etc.) pose for a group photograph in front of the two locomotives (the original two that met at the actual event, if the title card is to be believed: the Jupiter from the C.P. and #116 from the U.P.). The picture is taken, but the movie viewer wonders who all these people are; as in real life, the big, important people in society get the credit and fame for a job that was done by the unimportant but very interesting little people.

This movie is about those little people, pretty much all of them it sometimes seems, and in it a young John Ford does all the things right that, as an older man, he would get wrong in "Cheyenne Autumn."

Ford was making "The Iron Horse" for audiences who were already familiar with the gritty realism in William S. Hart's films, so he had to give it almost a documentary feel in some parts, as another commenter noticed. There's also a lot of give-and-take between ethnic groups that at times gets pretty sharp-edged, just like reality, but it always (and sometimes very subtly) is resolved by their work on a common project, for a common goal.

Ford also seems to build clichés just to blow them away. (Spoiler coming up.) The big Indian attack on workers at the end of the line goes pretty much as we expect at first, up to the point where the reinforcements arrive--no cavalry in this movie; it is fellow workers coming to the rescue, but only after a verbal brawl between the Irish and the Italians back in town, which was resolved when Texans arrived with several thousand cattle, and when they saw what was going on, stampeded them through town to force the Italians to get onto the relief train (Ford uses his excellent "run directly into the camera" view with the stampede and also a few other places in the film).

See what I mean about layers? Right; back at the end of the line, the Indians are still whooping it up in a circle around the workers who are holed up under the cars. Reinforcements arrive and drive the Indians off.

But then the Indians regroup, line up, and charge, cavalry style. Things look desperate for our heroes but they are finally rescued...by more Indians.

It's a well-prepared surprise and that is so enjoyable. There are no deus ex machina moments in "The Iron Horse"; you just start wondering what is going to happen next and watch it all come together perfectly.

Other excellent points include the casting of Charles Edward Bull as Lincoln (what else did he do, I wonder; his IMDb bio is empty). The bar fight scene is excellent, too, and so is the death match between Davy and Two Fingers (which O'Brien's training as a fighter makes especially realistic).

By the way, Miriam doesn't care that Davy went into a bar; her problem is that Davy broke his word by fighting Jesson after telling her he would not. It's a really stupid move on her part, and the audience recognizes that - kind of an old melodrama touch, but it keeps the story moving.

It's interesting to see Ford's explanation of the buffalo hunts in this movie (they were food for the workers) and contrast it to the one suggested in "The Searchers" (they were slaughtered to starve the native people off the land).

Well, enough. See this movie. It's over 2 hours long (how many reels was that, I wonder) and that is just the right length.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
John Ford Finally Gets On Track!
bsmith55525 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"The Iron Horse" was Director John's Ford tribute to the building of the transcontinental railroad in the 1860s. It was a monumental task to which he did himself proud. Many of the so-called "Fordisms" started here. The secondary love story plays second fiddle to the construction of the two railroads...one from the east (Union Pacific) and one from the west (Central Pacific)

In pre Civil War Springfield Illinois, David Brandon (James Gordon) and his son Davy (Winston Miller) dream of a trans continental railroad across the country. Skeptic neighbor Thomas Marsh (Will Walling) has his doubts. A pre- presidential Abraham Lincoln (Charles Edward Bull) provides encouragement.

Brandon Sr. and Jr. set off for the west leaving a teary eyed Miriam Marsh (Peggy Cartwright, her doubting father and a hopeful Lincoln behind. On the trail, the Brandons are attacked by a group of renegade Cheyenne. While Davy hides, his father is brutally murdered by a white two fingered renegade known as Deroux (Fred Kohler) (Bauman in the International version).

In 1862 Congress authorizes the building of the two railroads from opposite sides of the country. Marsh has now become the chief builder of the Union Pacific with Jesson (Cyril Chadwick) his chief engineer. Miriam (Madge Bellamy) is engaged to the oily Jesson. One day a young Pony Express rider xbeing chased by Indians comes into the camp. He turns out to be a full grown Davy Brandon (George O'Brien) who is delighted to meet his childhood sweetheart.

Davy tells Marsh of a pass he and his father had discovered years earlier that would save the railroad 200 miles. Deroux/Bauman however owns all the land in the other direction and plans to stop Davy from showing the way. He enlists prostitute Ruby (Gladys Hulette) to seduce Jesson and convince him to thwart Davy's plans. At the pass, Jesson tries to murder Davy but unknowingly fails.

When Davy walks into the camp a showdown between himself and Jesson is inevitable. Meanwhile, Deroux/Bauman orchestrates an Indian attack on the rail camp but is caught by Davy and the two battle with Davy discovering that it was Deroux.Bauman who murdered his father. Fearing Miriam's scorn if he goes after Jesson, Davy chooses to leave camp and join the Central Pacific crew. Eventually the two Railways meet and the country is united.

As would be the case in future Ford films, he introduces the three Irish ex soldiers: Sergeant Slattery (Francis Powers), Cpl. Casey (J. Farrell MacDonald) and Pvt. Schultz (Jim Welch) who provide the comedic moments in the film. Casey's visit to the dentist is a case in point. There is also a Judge Roy Bean type Judge Haller who administers "justice" across a bar. Buffalo Bill and Wild Bill Hickok also show up briefly. Although Davy takes care od Deroux/Bauman, the fate of Jeeson is left unknown.

George O'Brien became an overnight star and went on to a lengthy career. With this film, John Ford established himself as a front line director.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed