Oh, Yeah? (1929) Poster

(1929)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Too much filler, but still good stuff from the dawn of sound
AlsExGal20 November 2016
Robert Armstrong and James Gleason play, respectively, hobos Dude and Dusty, riding the rails until they take a job on the same line they have been sponging rides off of. Dude falls for the railroad timekeeper, Pinkie(Patricia Caron), and Dusty falls for a waitress at the railroad restaurant, the oddly named "The Elk" (Zasu Pitts). When they take the job, two supervisors are discussing that there have been two men, possible employees, that have been stealing from the railroad, and to keep a look out. Now Dusty and Dude had a fight with these exact two guys when they were still hobos, were bound to see them in camp, yet nothing ever comes of it.

There is much filler in this film. There is a prolonged scene of the workers eating in the railroad restaurant that doesn't really have a point, and there is a throwaway scene of the workers sitting around a campfire at night singing off-key that I could have done without. Even the scenes where there is dialogue and action run too slow, but it is not to the point where I was bored.

As for the romances, the one between Dude and Pinkie seems to come out of nowhere. All she does is smile at him and days later they are talking matrimony. But she turns out to be smarter than most girls in these early talkie romances. She says that Dude is one step above a bum, and he needs to change. She says he can start by putting a hundred dollars of each paycheck into savings. He agrees.

As for Dusty and "The Elk", because both Gleason and Pitts were great at verbal comedy, you actually see their relationship grow through conversation.

So everything is looking up until Dude breaks his promise and loses most of his paycheck at gambling one night, but was seen depositing one hundred dollars the next day, and he happened to be the last person seen with "Splinters" who was beaten and robbed that same night of an unknown amount, and is lying in a coma unable to say what happened.

What does happen is everybody blames Dude because of the circumstantial evidence. Even Dusty and Pinkie believe he is guilty. So Dude hops the next train out leaving his job and girl behind, crestfallen that nobody believes him. How will this all work out? Watch and find out.

Questions I had - What exactly IS a railroad timekeeper? If everybody thought Dude beat and robbed Splinters why didn't they detain him rather than just let him leave? If Splinters was not dead why did they not wait until he came to and ask him what happened? Will all of these people not know each others' real names until they have to fill out a marriage certificate? Oh, and one more thing. Some have mentioned that the fight scenes on the train looked silly because of the speed. That is because those scenes had to be done with silent film due to the early sound pedigree with sound dubbed over it, thus the scenes just did not come out at the right speed.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oh, Yeah? Yeah!
timtracyjc8 December 2020
I agree with other reviewers who noted the film has some unnecessary padding. However, I loved the friendship between Dude and Dusty, and found Robert Armstrong and James Gleason very believable in the roles. It was an enjoyable film and worth a viewing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One for all us railroad buffs!
JohnHowardReid20 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I thoroughly agree with the May 14 reviewer, but why allot the movie only four points? I think this film deserves at least a seven. In fact, I would have allotted it an eight, if it were not for some of the old- hat, speeded-up defects, plus the obvious use of stock footage that the previous reviewer rightly objected to. On the other hand, I didn't think the reviewer called enough attention to the movie's good points, particularly the great performance delivered by Patricia Caron. She had an extremely difficult role, but nonetheless she managed to make the character wholly convincing, despite the fact that both the director and the film editor were seemingly in love with her as they keep repeating slight variations of her smiling face an inordinate number of times, both in season and out. Despite this over-attentiveness, Miss Caron delivered her role with such expertise that in early scene she actually brought tears to my eyes! Available on a quite watchable Alpha DVD.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The trips on this train really are trippy.
mark.waltz14 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Back in the days when hobos could hop on freight trains, they could get free trips anywhere, provided that they weren't caught, and if they were, their next free trip would be one they didn't want to take. In the case of drifters Robert Armstrong and James Gleason, they seem to be lucky in that aspect with the exception of whom they encounter as far as other drifters. This swell early talkie is filled with lots of moving train action, starting off with a fight on top of the moving train, then moves into a rough but romantic direction when Armstrong and Gleason settle into a town called Linda. There they meet two hard-boiled waitresses (Patricia Caron and Zasu Pitts) who strike their fancy, and vice versa. The film culminates with the same villains from the first reel once again fighting with Armstrong and Gleason, with the car they are on top of all of a sudden becoming loose and heading towards a passenger train. It's up to Caron and Pitts to rescue them, with Zasu ironically getting to the switch hopefully in the nick of time. As speedy as a moving train, this only suffers a little bit for its creakiness, while some of the situations (especially the sped-up fight scenes) are unintentionally funny. It marks an interesting early directing credit for Tay Garnett who has directed many classics but is unfortunately a forgotten name among the great directors of the golden age of cinema.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oh, Yeah? review
JoeytheBrit5 May 2020
Robert Armstrong and James Gleason are hobo buddies who fall for a couple of waitresses after getting a job on the railroad. The two actors work well together, but the script is weak and there's way too much padding.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Even after 74 minutes, nothing seems to happen in this one!
planktonrules30 June 2020
"Oh, Yeah?" is a very early talkie and it's unusual in that it has practically no plot whatsoever! rail-riding hobos, Dude and Dusty (Robert Armstrong and James Gleason), get jobs with the railroad. And, on their spare moments they romance a couple ladies who work for the commissary. Oddly, despite having jobs and the audience being told that they are working double-shifts at one point, you never really see them work and they ALWAYS seem to be off work. And, amazingly, not a whole lot more happens during the course of the film!!

"Oh, Yeah?" is a slow and meandering film. It even has time for a few musical numbers which seem a bit out of place considering that the plot isn't exactly complicated or developed. Because of this, it's slow going and tough to love this film. The actors seem to try their best but the script just doesn't give them nor the audience much.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hasn't Aged Well
boblipton3 January 2018
James Gleason and Robert Armstrong are a couple of boomers -- itinerant railroad men who hop from one line to another. They wind up operating out of a switching yard in the middle of nowhere where Zasu Pitts and Patricia Caron run the commissary and pay roll and everything that doesn't require too much muscle, and they all wind up intending to settle down. When one of the workers wins big in a crap game, gets his money stolen, and beaten unconscious, fingers point at Armstrong.

Director Tay Garnett and D. P. Arthur Miller try their hardest, but they shoot a lot of this outdoors and the sound rigs aren't up to it. Neither is the slow-and-dumb characterization of Armstrong very interesting. On the plus side, there are a couple of tracking shots early on, plenty of contemporary railroad slang in the dialogue, and the final sequence, which is shot half wild, permits some movement with undercranking that makes it genuinely interesting. On the whole, though, it has aged very poorly.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed