The Silent Enemy (1930) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A docu-drama in the Robert Flaherty tradition
psteier19 January 2001
One of a number of fiction films of the 1920's and 1930's that attempt to show the life of primitive peoples before contact with European material culture. The best known example is Nanook of the North (1922).

Very well done, with much location shooting under trying circumstances for both the Ojibwe Indian cast and the crew. Interesting wild animal sequences, especially of the caribou.

The sound mostly is fine organ playing, with a short spoken introduction by Chief Yellow Robe (who played Chetoga, tribe leader).
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great cinematography, awful treatment of an important subject
Zinjanthropus4 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I was greatly impressed by the film's cinematography and direction, especially so under what must have been intensely difficult location shooting conditions. Beautiful scenes of migrating caribou, wolves running at top speed through the snowy forest, bears, and even a wolverine, elevate the diverse wildlife species represented in "The Silent Enemy" to par with the human actors. This Paramount production has an immediacy and a crisp air of authenticity rarely seen in films of the era.

The story line and acting are a different story, and together serve nearly to destroy the viewing experience. Anyone familiar with American Indian history and culture will wince at the one-dimensional stereotypes that almost uniformly obscure any chance of "The Silent Enemy's" helping to inform and enlighten the mass culture and broader audience that Paramount was able to reach. Sadly, the studio took the easy way out, playing to prejudice and racist attitudes of white audiences toward Indians. Some scenes of animal abuse may shock sensitive viewers.

Those glaring faux pas aside, though, this film is not to be missed. Few other titles come to mind that convey the drama and energy of wild nature as this does. The score is well done, and the visuals are full of life.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
See it for the spectacular images and forget the story
dbborroughs8 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Docudrama about a tribe of Indians in the Canadian wilderness over the course of a year. The print I saw opened with chief of the tribe addressing the audience before the film itself started. The film proper is full of truly spectacular footage of the native North American's going through their paces from fishing to hunting to traveling in the snow or going down the river in a canoe. Almost 80 years on one still goes "Oh Wow" with much of the footage. Even while its clear that the footage was staged, its more stages in the way of "this is the way we do things". The only real problem is that some of the stuff that helps move the "story" seems creaky. Actually bits of the movie seem creaky. Most of the film is silent with music and narration which seems to slow the pace down and make much of what happens seem quaint. This doesn't mean its bad, it just makes the film okay and not as great as what's in the footage. Worth a look, as a rental if nothing else, more so if you want to see a life that's pretty much all gone now.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed