The Perfect Alibi (1930) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"So it's you who are the fool after all!"
Film_Nitrate31 August 2016
For his second feature at the newly established Associated Radio Pictures, filmed at Beaconsfield whilst the famous Ealing Studios were still under construction, Basil Dean turned to a crime play from 1928 - The Fourth Wall. The play itself was unremarkable, but for the fact that it was written by A.A. Milne, who would become internationally known for his Winnie-the-Pooh stories. Dean himself adapted the script for the big screen, and altered the name to Birds of Prey (it was retitled again for its US release the following year to the less ambiguous The Perfect Alibi).

At ninety minutes, the film has a slightly inflated running time considering most of the Ealing films released in the early 30s generally lasted between 60-70 minutes. This works against the film, and the first thirty minutes are a confusing mess. Things quickly slot into place when the murder itself is carried out, and we're treated to a Colombo-style killing where we witness the murderers and understand their motives. The suspense is then seeing if their "perfect alibi" is good enough to outwit the police and family of the murdered man.

While at a dinner at a large country house, the retired head of the family, Arthur Hilton (C. Aubrey Smith) tells his guests and family about a time he was working as a police commissioner in Africa, and was working to catch a gang of three men who'd been responsible for a number of local murders. He found himself caught by them first, but they didn't kill him as he didn't carry a gun – therefore they didn't believe he was a policeman and let him go. Hilton later caught the men and was responsible for the hanging of one of them – though due to a discrepancy with evidence the other two escaped with 20-year terms in prison instead of the noose. It then transpires that Laverick (Warwick Ward) – a quiet man and keen birdwatcher, and Carter (Robert Loraine) – a loud, confident man – are the two men that Hilton locked up all those years ago (under different identities) and have been plotting their revenge ever since. The murder is perfectly arranged, making it look like suicide with even the local police believing this to be the case. It's only when Arthur's plucky nephew Jimmy (Frank Lawton) and his inquisitive girlfriend Mollie (Dorothy Boyd) begin their own investigation that they realise all isn't as it seems. Bonus points for spotting Jack Hawkins in his cinema debut.

Indeed, if the script was taken from an unremarkable play, the film itself is similarly unremarkable. The pacing is clunky and the film feels too long. At times the upper-class accents of the women in particular are almost indecipherable (and that's to a native English speaker). The acting varies between wooden and unintentionally hilarious (though the young couple played by Frank Lawton and Dorothy Boyd are far more convincing than the rest of the cast). It seems a little unsporting to criticise Basil Dean excessively for the poor direction, as this was one of his first films, and virtually every director was forced to learn their craft again with the dawn of sound films, but "functional" is probably the most polite way to explain his contribution. There's a "Great Train Robbery" (1903) influence in the first shot as we witness a revolver firing at close range, but overall there is far too much talking - this may have been required in Dean's beloved theatres but in the film there is simply not enough use of the visual aspects of cinema.

However, there remains an undeniable charm to the whole thing. As with Dean's previous film, 'Escape!' (1930), there's a lot of location shooting which shows off the beautiful English countryside. And even though – after the first half hour – the film is terribly predicable, it's still entertaining enough, despite the aforementioned pacing issues.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Talk Talk Talk
malcolmgsw19 July 2010
This was the second production from Associated Talking Pictures in their studios in Ealing.It was to become world famous in later years as "Ealing Studios" under the aegis of Michael Balcon.The initial production chief was Basil Dean.He was basically a stage director and as such he was responsible for many misjudgements in the early years ,of which this was an example.This lack of judgement and his unpopularity as a result of his interference in direction of films was ultimately to see him fired from his job a few years later.This film is more of a battle of wits rather than a murder mystery.Nothing happens for the first half hour.then the sole murder is committed.we see who commits the murder so no drama or suspense there.It is seeing how the leads manage to deduce the murderer and track him or her down that is the focus of the last part of the film.This takes a rather long and dull 90minutes.Compare it with say the sound version of "Blackmail" and whilst technically it is far superior ,as a story and film it is vastly inferior..It is from a play and unfortunately it shows.It was a fault of some early talkies that they did nothing but talk and this is fully apparent in this film.Although Dean did bring to Ealing both Gracie Fields and George Formby he also brought further films such as this to ATP and this continual misjudgement led to his departure.The only interest in this film is seeing C.Aubrey Smith,,Nigel Bruce and Frank Lawton before they went on to their respective successes in Hollywood.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Of some interest but over talky and of its time
loloandpete13 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Basil Dean and based on a play entitled The Fourth Wall by A A Milne, famous of course for Winnie the Pooh. It also marked the film debut of Jack Hawkins, but you'd have to be eagle eyed to spot him as a household servant. The problem with it is, it is more or less a stage play photographed for the screen and oustays its welcome in terms of running time. The story is simple and could easily be wrapped up in an hour but here it is 90 minutes with way too much dialogue and some mannered acting that is difficult to take seriously in this day and age. British film making in 1930 wasn't yet on a par with American production. Frank Lawton and Dorothy Boyd as the young romantics and amateur 'detectives' of the piece, are rather mannered and affected and Robert Lorraine as one of the bad guys, is intermittently good but can't help but over act on occasion. His partner in crime, Warwick Ward gives an interesting performance in that we see the guilty conscience of a murderer. There is an interesting idea of the police being a father and son team with the father (Tom Reynolds) being a local Constable and the son (David Hawthorn) being a Scotland Yard Sergeant. My main reasons for tuning in were Nigel Bruce and C Aubrey Smith but the former, simply billed as Major is given far too little to do and the latter is effective and brings his usual gravitas but is polished off far too early. Of the remaining cast, Ellis Jeffreys and Audrey Carten do a lot with a little.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dear oh dear!
Lucy-Lastic23 November 2016
I thought "Escape!" was bad enough, but this takes first prize for clipped upper class accents and one can only wonder at what the steaming masses made of these people when they saw them at the flicks on a Saturday night out. Apart from that the acting was also very hammy and I cannot agree with Film_Nitrate:- "though the young couple played by Frank Lawton and Dorothy Boyd are far more convincing than the rest of the cast" as they seemed to me to be the worst and the only people to come out of it all with some credibility were C. Aubrey Smith and Nigel Bruce.

Nevertheless, it was fascinating to watch as a curio of its time - all I have to do now is run through it again quickly to spot a 20 year old Jack Hawkins in his first film (!?) as he was not mentioned in the film credits – only on IMDb it seems, so well done them!...................................(Oh yes, there he is – and almost blink an you'll miss him!!)
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Anyone who loves birds can get a meal out of Uncle Arthur"
hwg1957-102-26570412 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The film is based on a play by A. A. Milne and it does show, the main action including the murder being confined to one large room. It is also quite talky like a stage play. The murder occurs after half an hour and we see who are the culprits, the remainder of the movie being how their guilt is established. The film is too long, its 98 minute run time could have been done in 80 minutes. The solving of the mystery is interesting and the last scene between the murdered man's niece and one of the murderers is quite tense but entertaining. The acting varies and some of it betrays the age of the movie but I enjoyed gruff C. Aubrey Smith as Uncle Arthur and charming Dorothy Boyd as his nice niece Mollie who investigates the crime.

An uncredited Jack Hawkins in his first film appears as a servant. A small start to a splendid film career.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Almost saved by the photography. Pity about the editing.
mark.waltz25 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Some moments of this staticky British mystery seem to be technically advanced at times, with a stunning indoor set, some great shots of the characters outside, and certain angles looking rather complicated to get in the photography considering its release early in the talkie era. What faults there are with the technical aspects are understandable, and it does seem better technically than many films made in the United States.

But it's still hard to watch even though the buildup to the murder of C. Aubrey Smith's character does have some great moments. He's great in his limited footage, and the young couple played by Frank Lawton and Dorothy Boyd are fun to watch. Nigel Bruce does a good job with his little material, and of the others, Ellis Jeffreys was interesting as a matronly socialite. Takes some patience though to get through, but it is pretty elaborate.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed