Le blanc et le noir (1931) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Racy or racist comedy?
GrandeMarguerite6 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
"The chains of marriage are so heavy that it takes three to bear them", once said French playwright and film director Sacha Guitry. Guitry, himself a notorious womanizer, knew what he was talking about.

Sacha Guitry wrote the play on which "Le Blanc et le Noir" was based, with an all-too familiar plot revolving around adultery (but with a strange twist -- just wait a minute). It was however Hollywood-trained Robert Florey (with the support of Marc Allégret) who officially handled the directorial reins. Maybe too many cooks spoiled the broth, because the least one can say about "Le Blanc et le Noir" is that it wasn't very well directed. The problem with plays is how to transform them into movies. Here, with the exception of maybe the first few scenes, it is stage work at its worst, that is to say static, old-fashioned and uninspiring. Guitry's sparkling humor didn't need that. Or maybe it did, as "Le Blanc et le Noir" displays some unpleasant details.

With some of the best actors of the time (Raimu, Fernandel, Pauline Carton being the most famous of them), the cast literally saves the film from mediocrity (with a couple of "bons mots"). While vacationing in the South of France, child-hating Marcel Desnoyers (Raimu) leaves his wife Marguerite (Suzanne Dantès) alone in their hotel room while he dallies with the local maidens. The evening settles in and Marguerite falls for the crooning of an American band singer she can hear from her room (as he sings to entertain people at dinner time). The neglected wife arranges therefore a nocturnal rendezvous with the singer in order to know him, hem, better. This is how she goes into the singer's darkened room, whereupon she enjoys an evening of purple passion. Nine months later, however, Marguerite gives birth to a black child (yes, the singer was black and Marguerite wasn't aware of that, as she never had the opportunity of meeting her lover in broad daylight!). Her flustered husband scurries about trying to set things right, and in so doing finds out that he genuinely loves children -- whereupon he declares he would like to become a daddy himself. End of story? No, it would be going too fast. One cannot overlook the blatant racism of this film. Yes, Marcel would love to have a child of his own, but not a colored one -- not because such a child is the living proof of his mother's cheat, but because "even a handicapped child would be better". Unpalatable? By today's standards, yes. If there were a study to be written about prejudice against Blacks in early French cinema, then "Le Blanc et le Noir" should not be missed. For the most amazing of all, that the idea of a husband can be jealous of another man not because he slept with his wife (as such things happen, don't they?) but because he is a n--er (forgive me for using this word) was apparently not shocking at all for the audience of the 1930s is probably the most disturbing thing about this film. If it were only racy (in the classy Guitry manner), the film would be all right, although poorly directed. But a couple of cues puts it beyond the bounds of good taste and makes the viewer uncomfortable during a scene or two.

Sacha Guitry was so disappointed with the direction of "Le Blanc et le Noir" that he eventually decided to bring himself his witty theatrical work to the big screen, which he actually did only a couple of years later. Needless to say that these latter works are much better.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Downright racist,sorry!
ulicknormanowen17 December 2020
It was the first takies ;most of the French movies looked like filmed stage productions ; neither Marc Allégret nor Robert Florey (who would make "the beast with five fingers later on) is able to really transfer a play to the screen ; it will take the playwright himself to do his plays justice .

This play has not worn well ;that the first baby is never shown speaks volumes about the thirties zeitgeist ; the film is not really racy :after all ,the heroine , wanted to take revenge on her husband ,always away for his would be business, and she had chosen the bell boy (Fernandel ,a virgin lad who asks his first lover how to go about making love) ;but in the dark ,she makes the fatal mistake .

Not racy,but downright racist and do not get me wrong : I love Guitry's tremendous wit ,but would you show this old hat stuff to a black friend? You certainly wouldn't ,not only for the way everyone treats the baby ,but also for the offensive words galore.It's another era , OK , but it does not make up for the bad taste and some hints (there are plenty of "those" babies in state care);the ending is distastefully bourgeois ,which is all the more infuriating since you know how great the denouements were in Guitry's works ("le roman d'un tricheur" notably)
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed