High Stakes (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A woman of 40 will never look 30 behaving and dressing like 20 ...
AlsExGal18 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
... which is something someone should have pointed out to Mae Murray during her brief talkie career. I give this one 6 stars on the curiosity factor alone - plotwise it is really no great shakes.

The movie begins with wealthy 50-something Richard Lennon marrying 22 year old Dolly (Mae Murray). Richard's "kid" brother Joe (Lowell Sherman) was supposed to be best man but never appears. Instead he is in his favorite location - a speak-easy drowning his troubles and staging a passive aggressive protest to the marriage of his older brother.

I really don't know what is up with Ms.Murray's performance here - she is constantly calling her new husband "Daddy" and speaking in an annoying baby talk tone. What is really jaw-dropping are the outfits that she parades around in. She is definitely well into getting a dowager's figure and yet she's wearing slinky nightgowns and very low-cut dresses. Because movie prints in circulation are not in the best condition it is impossible to get the full visual effect 1931 audiences must have had.

Although Joe appears drunk or pseudo-drunk throughout, he is really just pulling an "I,Claudius" ruse so he can get the goods on Dolly whom he is sure is just after his older brother's money. As for older brother Richard, rather than just having a midlife crisis he appears to want a younger wife for a variety of reasons, most of all he wants a son since he and his late first wife never had any children.

The climax seems to have the moral of saying that older men should just face the fact that their romantic days are behind them, that they look ridiculous with very young wives, and that if they don't already have children they have to realize it's just not in the cards. The final scene is rather sad, showing Joe and Richard vacationing on a ship at sea. Joe, still in his late 30's is apparently on his honeymoon with long-time love Ann (Karen Morley), but Richard is asleep in a deck chair - alone. Today that seems like a depressing sentence for a man in his 50's, especially if he is a widower in good health and free to marry. I guess it just goes to point out how old the age of 50 was considered back in 1931 as compared to today.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Screen Chemistry
boblipton25 February 2021
Edward Martindel is enchanted with his young bride, Mae Murray (in her last screen role). They have so much in common, he tells his brother, perpetually drunk, unsuccessful playwright Lowell Sherman. He looks forward to finally having a child. After half a life with his now dead wife, he doesn't notice notice the affair she is carrying on with Leyland Hodgson any time he's not in direct view. Sherman does, though, and he wants to rescue his brother from her.... but doesn't know how to tell him and convince him without hurting him beyond the bounds of their loving fraternity.

There are problems with this movie, mostly concentrated in Mae Murray whose squeak, baby-doll voice and coy manner grates on my nerves; neither does Sherman's slurred speech, letting everyone know he's drunk all the time. On the other hand, Karen Morley as Martindel's secretary and Sherman's love interest is interestingly written and straightforwardly portrayed. Best of all is the chemistry between Martindel and Sherman as brothers. If you've been fortunate enogh to have someone you've been close with for so long you can't imagine life with that person, then you'll appreciate this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mae Murray's Final Film
drednm20 October 2010
The legendary Mae Murray is a fascinating train wreck in HIGH STAKES, a little B film film about a cloying, baby-talking woman (Murray) who marries an "older man" while she carries on an affair. The older man's "kid brother" is a failed playwright (Lowell Sherman) who seems to stay happily soused throughout the film.

But soused or not, Sherman picks up on a series of clues and investigates the woman and her friend, discovering they are scam artists with a history of bilking rich millionaire.

A slight plot but well enough done. Sherman is excellent. He had a long acting career on stage, in silent films, and in talkies (although he died in 1934 at age 49). He was also a distinguished director. Here he plays the deceptively drunken Joe beautifully. He is dismissed by everyone as a failure but his loyalty to his older brother and his street smarts make him a clever and enjoyable character.

On the other hand, Mae Murray is just plain awful in this film. At age 42, she plays a character who is supposedly 32 pretending to be 22! Murray does this awful baby-talk routine and can't pronounce her Rs. She played the same kind of character in BACHELOR APARTMENT (also with Lowell Sherman). She skips and preens and calls her husband Daddy. Is it an act? Is it the real Mae Murray? For a brief few minutes, she drops the baby act after she is exposed and displays a tough and bitter side that seems to better suit the 42-year-old star. But because Murray made only 3 talkies, it's hard to tell what's really going on with her act.

Good support from Edward Martindel as the duped husband, Karen Morley as the secretary, Leyland Hodgson as DeSalta, and Charles Coleman as the butler.

Mae Murray was a major star of the teens and 20s. It's too bad she was all washed up by 1931. Lowell Sherman should be rediscovered as an actor and director.
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Talky drawing room comedy filled with daddies, drunks and dames...
mark.waltz15 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
An over-the-top Lowell Sherman is the younger brother of aging Edward Martindel, a widower recently married to a woman (Mae Murray) young enough to be his granddaughter. She "daddies" him every chance she can to keep herself endeared to him and he eats it up like a cocktail cherry. When "daddy" invites an attractive business associate (Leyland Hodgson) over for dinner, the stage is set for the drunken Sherman to prove what he's suspected all along, that "young" Murray (a veteran of silent films) isn't above male companionship outside their seemingly perfect marriage.

The film is all frivolous fluff until the dramatic conclusion where Sherman confronts the expectant Murray with her alleged infidelity. Up to this point, it truly seemed that the marriage has been successful. In truth, there is a definite affection between the two, even if passion was obviously absent. Amusing for what it is and not as creaky as many other early sound talkies, it still contains some performances that could be best described as melodramatically stagy. A subplot between Sherman and Karen Morley as Hodgson's secretary seems to have no other point than to make the effete Sherman seem more masculine and a bit of a ladies man.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mae's final starring role, a sound movie.
stephen638716 July 2003
"High Stakes" is Mae Murray's final starring performance, an early talkie. The film has little to offer today's viewer,light comic fluff distinguished only by the fine performance of the under-rated actor Lowell Sherman. Mae, for the first time in her lengthy career as a screen beauty, is finally beginning to show her age. The print available for my viewing was poor indeed. Recommended for die-hard Murray, Sherman fans and scholars of early talkies.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed