Laughing Sinners (1931) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Follow The Fold And Stray No More
bkoganbing8 December 2008
The second film that had Clark Gable and Joan Crawford together didn't start out that way. Laughing Sinners started out with Johnny Mack Brown as the Salvation Army Worker who saves Crawford and the film was completed when Louis B. Mayer saw the film and said reshoot it with Gable. This was after having seen them together in Dance Fools Dance where Gable was a villain and had only a couple of scenes with Crawford. This is according to Joan herself in a tribute she wrote in the Citadel Film Series Book, The Films of Clark Gable.

Crawford is definitely in her element as singer/dancer and good time Prohibition party girl who falls for the charms of Neil Hamilton, a traveling salesman. You know what a bunch of party animals they are, just ask Arthur Miller. Anyway Hamilton decides though he thinks Joan's great in the hay, he wants to marry the boss's daughter and does, leaving her flat and despondent.

One night as she's ready to throw herself off a bridge, Salvation Army worker Clark Gable stops her. She likes him, but still has a yen for Hamilton and he, her.

Given Clark Gable's later image the casting of him as a Salvation Army worker is ludicrous. Mayer knew that and during the course of the film he gives him a nice prison background before he joined Edwin Booth's Army. The only way Gable could possibly fit the part. Anyway Mayer did it for the obvious chemistry between Gable and Crawford.

It's more Joan's picture than his though. Later on her talents as a dancer which brought her to film in the first place would be not seen at all. So Laughing Sinners is a treat in that way.

The film is based on a Broadway play Torch Song which ran for 87 performances the year before and starred Mayo Methot, Reed Brown, and Russell Hicks in the parts that Crawford, Hamilton, and Gable have. Coming over from the Broadway cast is Guy Kibbee in the role of another salesman, the only one to repeat his role from Broadway. Roscoe Karns and Cliff Edwards play another pair of salesmen and Marjorie Rambeau is Crawford's party girl friend.

Russell Hicks is definitely more my idea of a Salvation Army worker, but Gable's more my idea of a leading man opposite Joan Crawford.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Crawford, Gable, and Screen Chemistry
nycritic9 March 2005
One of those movies about fallen women who reform that were common in pre-Code Hollywood, LAUGHING SINNERS, also known as COMPLETE SURRENDER, comes less as a movie of quality as standard fare that features the two leads, Crawford and Gable -- she already a star, he a rising actor -- coming together and making early music to the viewer's eyes. Before Hepburn and Tracy, these were the ones the public wanted to see together even if the movie in itself was less than memorable, and MGM gave it to them 8 times.

Also a feature where one can get to see Crawford dance, sing, and indirectly, essay what would become a breakout role in RAIN only a year later.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joan sings and does the `farmer dance'
Jim Tritten25 August 2002
Interesting early talkie with Joan as a laughing sinner who is then cast aside by her love interest and saved by Clark Gable and the Salvation Army. Having seen Cary Grant previously as a temperance league type (`She Done Him Wrong'), I was able to accept Gable in this same role. Good moral messages as we see how traveling men use `loose' women in small towns and the good that is done by organizations like the Salvation Army.

Aside from that, the best part of the movie is watching Joan dance made up to look like a farmer – with a long noses and a long goatee. She sings and dances as well as anyone. Of course switching later into Adrian-designed gowns makes for an interesting contrast. Early in the movie, there is a great facial shot of Joan as she anticipates meeting her boyfriend upstairs in the cabaret. This is a good story and makes for a pleasant hour and a quarter entertainment. Recommended.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Temptation / Salvation
pauldeboef6 June 2004
"Laughing sinners" was a pleasant surprise to me. I never knew what a good actress Joan Crawford was until I saw this film. I saw her rather exaggerating performance in "Grand Hotel", and a better performance in 1931's "Possessed", but here she is totally convincing and real. There are moments of great beauty, especially the scenes between Crawford and Clark Gable, moments when the film shows a timeless quality. Gable and Crawford are completely believable as the Salvation Army officers : sincere, vulnerable and intense. Clark Gable in a very unusual role - wise, calm, sensitive and understanding - It makes him powerful in a subtle way. Neil Hamilton is terrific especially in the scene - a very long uninterrupted take ! - when he tries to persuade and seduce Joan Crawford - for a night of bliss. Can he offer her salvation ?
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Early Look At Crawford, Gable & Hamilton
ccthemovieman-16 November 2005
Like a lot of early '30s film, I found this a pretty interesting short (72 minutes) story. This one is about a chorus girl-type who gets jilted, hooks up with a Salvation Army man, then is enticed back to the old sinful ways for a night with the man who jilted her and finally realizes she is better off with the good guy and the good morals.

This is an early look at Joan Crawford, who is blonde here with huge eyes. Clark Gable is sans mustache and really looks young. Neil Hamilton, the third lead, is the same man who went on to play Commissioner Gordon in the Batman TV series three decades later. In here, he's the pagan bad guy.

This film goes a long way in portraying traveling salesmen as morally bankrupt people. Now why would they do that?!!
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I'd Rather Laugh With The Sinners Than Die With The Saints
mmallon48 July 2018
Laughing Sinners is surely some good publicity for The Salvation Army. The plot of Ivy/Bunny (Joan Crawford) leaving her previous life behind and finding happiness in the helping of others is moralising but never came off to me as overly preachy. I like Laughing Sinners despite the film's inconsistency with sections of the movie having little to no impact on the overall story. The first twenty minutes of set up, for example, could easily have been done in half the time. Yet despite this, there is a powerful emotional undercurrent at the heart of Laughing Sinners with a number of highly moving scenes making up for the less than stellar portions of the film.

At least some of these weaker moments are made passable from the presence of a comical, stereotypical Italian chef to a bizarre dance number in which Joan Crawford is dressed as a scarecrow; go figure. Likewise, another real highlight in Laughing Sinners is a scene in the park depicting a charity picnic which has such naturalism in both its documentary-like appearance as well as the acting; a piece of neorealism which doesn't feel like a movie set.

As soon as Clark Gable enters the picture at 22 minutes the film truly takes off. Any scene with Crawford and Gable is pure magic with the sincerity in their interactions which at no point feels like acting. I don't think there's any other actress of the time who can as effectively as Crawford make you pour out your heart for the poor woman and rarely has she ever looked as angelic as she does here in her Salvation Army uniform. Likewise, many people will laugh at the idea of Clark Gable playing a Salvation Army officer but Laughing Sinners provides a side of Gable I wish more people could see. Like his role of Dr Ferguson in Men In White (1934), the part of Carl Loomis is saintly without delving into the sickly with his ability to project a real sense of warmth especially with his interaction with children.

This is one of the few films in Gable's career in which he isn't a romantic lead as he only remains in the friend-zone with Joan. Never again would we see Gable as more of a boy scout and less the alpha male; as he cooks, wears sweaters and aprons and lives with his aunt.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A few excellent scenes make up for slow pace, predictable plot
csteidler15 December 2011
Joan Crawford is a café dancer whose long term, long distance affair with traveling salesman Neil Hamilton comes crashing to a finish when he dumps her by leaving her a goodbye note written on the back of a menu. Despondent, she sets out to jump into the river, only to be stopped and saved (in more than one sense) by mustache-less Salvation Army officer Clark Gable. Next thing you know, Joan is sporting an Army uniform herself and singing hymns….but sooner or later, Hamilton is bound to show up again. And what then?

The plot isn't much, but Crawford's performance is excellent as her character veers wildly from joyous flapper to reformed sinner. The scene where she reads Hamilton's note is stunningly sad. Gable never looks quite natural but does seem to contain a reservoir of strength and energy that lurks just beneath the surface of his peaceful character. –At least that's my view from this time and place; hard to imagine what effect his performance would have had on a 1931 audience just becoming familiar with that face, that screen presence.

The highlight of the film is almost certainly Joan's dance in an opening scene—donning a fake nose and beard and a farmer outfit, she humorously bounces around for a couple of minutes before shedding the costume and really cutting loose, to her audience's delight and her own obvious joy. It has to be said that Joan as flapper is quite a bit more exciting than Joan as saved woman.

Hamilton is superb in a thoroughly despicable role. Roscoe Karns and Guy Kibbee are fellow salesman and together they certainly portray the kind of sleazy crew who inspire good people to lock up their daughters.

Overall—no surprises but Crawford is certainly worth watching, especially the opening and closing minutes.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting pre-Code flick
sideways84 August 2003
A lot of interesting bits in this. O'Henry bars in 1931?! Reference to the Fresh Air taxi? Acting very good throughout, especially Neil Hamilton who was a real sleazeball. Joan Crawford, who I was never a big fan of, was very pretty, certainly better thas in "This Modern Age" (same year) and almost to her Lucille La Seur standards. The 2nd half was better than the 1st, but they, as was common then, always ended the movie too abruptly. Most revealing was the scene early on in which a bunch of kids were playing in the park, boys & girls. Some were black some were white. Then the religious right and their Code came along after which blacks were only portrayed as servants, buffoons and dullards.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pointless pairing of two hot stars, but no story.
mark.waltz18 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
If you want to see Joan Crawford in fake nose and beard dancing up a storm, then banging a drum to collect sinners a la Sarah Brown in "Guys and Dolls", then this is your movie. She goes from nightclub performer involved with "Batman's" Neil Hamilton to the very religious Clark Gable for no apparent reason other than the fact that he is a hunk. Hamilton dumps her to become respectable then comes back when she apparently finds salvation. Who would you choose? Of Crawford and Gables' many pairings together, this is the poorest of the lot. Marjorie Rambeau is somewhat amusing as a hardboiled pal of Crawfords, and Cliff Edwards and Guy Kibbee offer alright performances in underdeveloped roles, but the whole story (what there is) is simply no laughing matter.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Crawford and Gable Brighten Their Corner
DLewis16 April 2012
Kenyon Nicholson's play "Torch Song" ran for 87 performances on Broadway, closing in November 1930; this film adaptation was released in May of the following year, and some historic reviewers who had seen the original play complained about the radically different ending added to the movie. "Laughing Sinners" was lightened up considerably over the stage version, and according to Crawford the whole film was shot with Johnny Mack Brown in the role ultimately awarded to Gable, being re-shot with Gable on the orders of Louis B. Mayer. On Broadway, Crawford's role was portrayed by ill-fated actress Mayo Methot, later to marry Humphrey Bogart.

It is directed by Harry Beaumont, who handled Crawford's silent jazz baby films and later, "Dancing Lady." For Crawford, "Laughing Sinners" straddles a precipice between her singing and dancing activity and that of more serious drama; although already a star, her 1932 entries -- "Grand Hotel" and "Rain" -- would propel her status and popularity well beyond that of 1931. While it is a huge improvement over terribly stiff talkies like Garbo's "Anna Christie," "Laughing Sinners" is not Beaumont's best work, and the musical sequences are in some ways still the best thing about it. Crawford dominates the first half of the film and it's her boundless energy and enthusiasm that drives it. She is especially beautiful here, and her eyes radiate emotion; in the scene where she receives the "dear Jane" letter from first-class-heel Neil Hamilton, the reaction is played entirely through Crawford's ominous orbs. The most remarkable thing about it, though, is that Gable refuses to lay down and to let Crawford run away with this picture, which may have been what Mayer had in mind when he recast the role; this would prove the first of eight pictures Gable and Crawford would make together. In a sense, this picture feels like a "test" for the principals and, if so, Neil Hamilton fails it; he is stiff and colorless and one wonders why Crawford's dynamic character could be so head over heels with such a back-slapping good buddy. Some have mentioned that "Laughing Sinners" strains credibility somewhat, but within the context of 1931 the whole piece is well within the realm of the plausible; many American joined up with service and charity organizations such as the Salvation Army as a way to weather the economic depths of the depression. There are many scenes in "Laughing Sinners" that depression audiences could relate to, such as Crawford's spartan accommodations and the meal that Crawford and Gable share. The original play was set in a hotel and train station in Pomeroy, Ohio, and Ohioans will note references to Ohio place names, though there are no native exteriors.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Our Boy Howdy
utgard143 January 2014
Oh, boy. Clark Gable in the Salvation Army. Where did they come up with this stuff? Nightclub performer Ivy Stevens (Joan Crawford) is despondent upon learning Howard "Howdy" Palmer (Neil Hamilton) has no intention of marrying her. She was just a booty call to our boy Howdy. How Neil Hamilton got so many roles in the early '30s as a ladies man type is beyond me but that's how it was then I guess. Anyway, Ivy decides to jump off a bridge but she is stopped by kindly and handsome Salvation Army worker Carl (a mustacheless Clark Gable). Ivy joins up with the Salvation Army too and is seemingly happy with her new lifestyle. But then one day Howdy spots her and, despite being married now, makes a move for her. Can Ivy resist Howdy's seductive ways? Can any woman?

There's a few things wrong with this movie. First, on no planet does Joan freaking Crawford, at this time a young and sexy dancer, get that upset over being dumped by Neil Hamilton. He was born looking like a banker. So that's unbelievable. Second and third things are that Clark Gable is no Salvation Army worker and he sure as hell isn't a guy named Carl! Joan's farmer dance is the highlight of the movie and probably her best dancing number from all of her early dancing movies. Overall it's a watchable but mostly forgettable melodrama about a "wrong" woman going right. Avid Crawford and Gable fans will like it most.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
GREAT 1931 CLASSIC FILM!
whpratt17 August 2003
I have never seen this film up until recently and was amazed at the great talent of Joan Crawford(Ivy "Bunny" Stevens) "Humoresque" '46 with John Garfield. Joan was very sexy and wore very revealing clothes for the early 1930's, her dancing and singing was unbelievable and she was so very pretty, slim and trim, not like the real "Mommie Dearest" character her daughter told us about. Clark Gable (Carl Loomis),"Gone With the Wind"'39 was Ivy's prince charming as a Salvation Army convert and when she appears in the park with her beautiful white dress, you just knew there was going to be an immediate CONVERSION OF SOULS! Veteran actor, Roscoe Karns, (Gred Geer) played a great supporting role. This film is filled with surprises, even a little African American Boy stealing a bite from a girls doughnut tore me up, there is many deep soul searching messages in this film and LOTS OF LAUGHTER and one attempted jump off a bridge. ENJOY!
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Clark Gable in - Johnny Mack Brown out!
Pat-5417 November 1998
According to legend, Johnny Mack Brown completed this film, only to have his scenes re-filmed with the upcoming superstar, Clark Gable. Apparently, the team of Crawford and Gable was too much for MGM studios to resist, even though they want you to believe that Clark and Joan could be believed as Salvation Army officers! Somehow....I don't think so!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is truly awful
1930s_Time_Machine5 September 2023
Was there some drunken bet made at a debauched MGM booze-up late one night to see who could make the most ridiculous picture?

It must have been a challenge to keep making each subsequent minute worse than the previous one but they achieved it. Despite decent and naturalistic acting and reasonable direction from Harry Beaumont, the story is just too absurd to take seriously. The Joan Crawford character is simply not believable and how it develops is just stupid. She would not take those actions. Maybe the play this was based on made more sense but the film just leaves you open mouthed with horror at its poor writing. The author also wrote TAXI and UNION DEPOT which were pretty good so let's give him the benefit of doubt and also do him a favour by not watching this.

I know MGM were desperate to get Joan Crawford and Clarke Gable together in another picture (as indeed were Joan and Clarke to do in real life) but whoever cast them in this clearly had no idea who these people were. There couldn't have been a less likely couple in Hollywood ever to adopt a life of piety in the Salvation Army. Atrocious miscasting.

All this awfulness aside, once you start watching this you will stick it out to the end mainly because of the enticing acting and chemistry between the two leads (and Guy Kibbee is surprisingly good too) but you'll be annoyed with yourself for doing so.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
See this for Joan's "farmer" dance! Incredible!
tomligon16 August 2002
This may not be the greatest of the Crawford/Gable pairings, but their affinity for each other is obvious, and as always what is unsaid between them speaks volumes about their off-screen relationship. The film's other highlights include Joan's singularly eccentric "farmer" dance, for which she sports a false nose and beard! This was surely the inspiration for the Soggy Bottom Boys' "disguises" and dancing in the climax of 'O Brother Where Art Thou?'. In any event, the phenomenal originality of her performance provides another dimension to Crawford's enduring film legacy.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
difficult to describe
kyle_furr26 January 2004
This movie was different, i didn't like it or hate it, i just don't know what to say about it about. Joan Crawford and Clark Gable are good, and it's pretty unusual to see clark gable playing a christian. I liked possessed much better with gable and crawford, which also came out in 31.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
pre code Joanie... hardly ever shown on TCM
ksf-216 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Such a low rating... only a 4.9 as of today. Opens with Ivy (Joanie Crawford) running to catch the train when it comes in. She spends five minutes smooching her guy, and then shows up late for her show at the theater. Crawford had started as a "hoofer", and we get to see plenty of it in the silly show they put on. Some big names in here, in the early days... Neil Hamilton (Commissioner Gordon!) is "Howard" and a 30 year old Clark Gable (Rhett Butler, Gone with the Wind) had started in the silent films, and easily moved into talkies. You can see all the heavy make-up on Crawford, left over from the "silents"... Supporting Guy Kibbee and Rosceo Karns were in everything in the early days. Joan C. sings a couple times in this one, but clearly singing warn't her thang! She receives a telegram one night, and faints. She runs off, and bumps SMACK into Carl (Clark Gable) and they tell each other their stories. He is with the salvation army, and she is intrigued. naturally. who wouldn't be?? and about halfway through, we get the vaudeville act from Kibbee and his cronies... some old time humor. We cover a lot of ground in 72 minutes. Directed by Harry Beaumont, who had done a bunch of precode Crawford films. It's okay, but i can see why its rated pretty low. She spends the whole film running back and forth from Howard and Carl. takes a long time to get anywhere. Sound and picture quality are pretty good, considering its age.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A subject that was better explored in 1932's Rain
AlsExGal14 November 2009
This film is probably the weakest of the Gable/Crawford film pairings. It's not that their performances aren't great, it's just that they're not given that much to do. The storyline is very basic - Joan is a performer in a nightspot who has had a long-distance affair going with a traveling salesman, Howard Palmer (Neil Hamilton), for the past two years. He dumps her to marry the boss' daughter so he can further his career. He doesn't even have the courage to tell this to her face - he writes it on the back of a menu at the cafe and leaves before she reads it.

This action wounds Ivy (Joan) to the core, and she is about to jump off a bridge one night when she is stopped by a Salvation Army member, Carl Loomis (Clark Gable). The two become friends and pretty soon Ivy is donning a Salvation Army uniform herself. One night a year later, when Ivy and the Salvation Army are proselyting in a nearby town, she runs into her ex-lover Howard Palmer. After a year of separation Howard has decided he would like to have it both ways - he'd like to have his bang (Ivy) and his bucks (his wife of convenience). Will Ivy stand firm on her new beliefs or will she fall? This film does have a few good things going for it. In the first part of the film, when Ivy is still working in the nightclub, we get to see Joan sing and dance for an entire number. She doesn't do much of that in her long film career and it is always a treat. Then there is the somewhat ridiculous spectacle of Clark Gable as a Salvation Army worker - this is before he became known more as a charming sinner rather than a laughing one. You can chalk up that bit of casting to Louis B. Mayer. This film was originally shot with Johnny Mack Brown in the lead, but Mayer didn't like the outcome and reshot it with Gable. Finally there is Neil Hamilton as one of the most slippery characters you'll find. Hard to believe he didn't have a real career breakthrough for almost another 35 years when he was cast as Batman's Commissioner Gordon.

This whole issue of the thin line between good and evil in a person and the fact that those two sides exist in everyone is much more artfully explored in 1932's Rain, again starring Joan Crawford. That's a film I highly recommend.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sinning Laughers without much sinning (or laughing)
xan-the-crawford-fan15 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This film is so much more than "the first film Joan Crawford and Clark Gable made where they played love interests instead of him being a slimy gangster in a small part and her being a working woman like what happened in Dance Fools Dance". It's dull in spots, the plot is rather stupid, Crawford looked like she was having more fun as the sinner than as the Salvation Army worker, Gable is never quite convincing as a Salvation Army savior (he does a better job than Johnny Mack Brown could have ever done), but it's a short film and you never notice most of these things.

Crawford plays Bunny/Ivy, a young woman who is in love with whatshisname (forgot it, but the actor who plays him is Neil Hamilton). When whatshisname dumps her by letter, she is distraught and tries to commit suicide, but Clark Gable is there and he tries to get her to join the Salvation Army.

He tells her that the Salvation Army are having a picnic in the park tomorrow, and would she like to come. She initially doesn't want to, but she shows up anyway.

So Crawford joins the Salvation Army, and finds salvation (pardon the pun) in helping people and being with Gable. However, former loverboy who dumped her by letter finds the hotel where she is staying at and tries to get back with her. She is torn (Joan Crawford cliché- she's always torn between two or more men) between being noble with Gable or going back to being bad with whatshisname. She goes into whatshisname's hotel room and gets drunk (alcohol is illegal in the Salvation Army- one must be noble) and makes a fool out of herself, but Gable convinces her that the Salvation Army is the right place for her to be. Cut to a slightly glib shot of Crawford in her Salvation Army bonnet, holding hands with Gable as they walk through the park while everyone else involved with the Salvation Army saves people and feeds children.

Despite not kissing once (or even her falling into an awkward grip with him), the two leads light up the screen. They have more *** making eggs than most modern on-screen couples do while actually having...you know... (and they don't actually touch each other.)

Joan Crawford is extremely naturalistic in this film, to the point where I forgot she was acting. Heck, I almost forgot that she was Joan Crawford. She's sweet when she needs to be, convincing when she's not, and utterly heartbreaking when she's upset. Whatshisname was a jerk and she didn't deserve it.

Like I mentioned before, Gable is never quite convincing as a nice-guy Salvation Army worker, but he handles it well. This role may have been a step back for him, as other reviews have suggested, but his breakout would be this same year. Also this year, he made Possessed, again with Joan, which is even better than this film.

While the film itself is uneven, the leads will have you forget that. If you don't believe that Joan Crawford could act, watch one of her earlier films. As an added bonus, she's a lot easier to stomach when she's younger- and she's a sweetheart, as well.

Five stars for the choppy film, and added two for Crawford and Gable, bringing my rating up to seven, which seems to be the average for this title.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Duller than the title and the cast would suggest
gridoon202429 July 2018
Sexy Joan sings, dances (partly in male disguise!) and displays her thick, strong legs, until she sees the light under the guidance of Clark Gable and covers up in the Salvation Army robe. Their roles don't allow them much electricity in their chemistry, and they are not helped by a slight, mediocre script. ** out of 4.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good movie, but a bit preachy.
rickrudge31 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Laughing Sinners (1931)

This is your typical Joan Crawford vehicle, but she brings on a relative new actor into her movie, Clark Gable. This is before Gable gets typecast as the ultra-masculine and sexual gigolo (and many times bad guy). So, it's a refreshing portrayal.

Ivy 'Bunny' Stevens (Crawford) is a night club dancer and singer (with a heart of gold), but has it bad for her traveling salesman boyfriend, Howard Palmer (Neil Hamilton). When Howard dumps poor Ivy for his rich bosses daughter, Ivy takes it hard and is about to jump off of a bridge when a very friendly Salvation Army man, Carl Loomis (Clark Gable) stops her and gives her something else to live for.

Good-hearted Carl isn't preachy. He's fallen far from grace himself and can't judge anybody. When Ivy meets back up with Howard, who puts the moves on her, she regrets falling for his lines the next morning and doesn't feel worthy.

Carl, true to form, doesn't blame Ivy, telling her that if she wants to go back with Howard and that will make her happy, that he's all for that, but she shouldn't feel like she's not worthy to come back to the Salvation Army, because we all fall from grace sometimes. Naturally, Carl doesn't feel the same for Howard and gives him a nice sock on the jaw.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
only for Gable fans and the curious
planktonrules18 March 2006
What boob at MGM thought it would be a good idea to place the studly Clark Gable in the role of a Salvation Army worker?? Ironically enough, another handsome future star, Cary Grant, also played a Salvation Army guy just two years later in the highly overrated SHE DONE HIM WRONG. I guess in hindsight it's pretty easy to see the folly of these roles, but I still wonder WHO thought that Salvation Army guys are "HOT" and who could look at these dashing men and see them as realistic representations of the parts they played. A long time ago, I used to work for a sister organization of the Salvation Army (the Volunteers of America) and I NEVER saw any studly guys working there (and that includes me, unfortunately). Maybe I should have gotten a job with the Salvation Army instead!

So, for the extremely curious, this is a good film to look out for, but for everyone else, it's poor writing, sloppy dialog and annoying moralizing make for a very slow film.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Crawford takes up the tambourine.
st-shot4 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Even before he was typecast as a Hollywood he man Clark Gable found work playing toughs and gangsters in secondary roles with the exception of this role against type before or after stardom as a sincere Salvation Army worker trying to save good time cabaret girl Bunny Stevens from the wages of sin. Toned down from the macho self assuredness that would carry his career he gives a more than adequate performance supporting leads Joan Crawford and Neil Hamilton (yes, Inspector Gordon).

Bunny (Crawford) is a modern flapper out for a good time when she get's the gate from her married traveling salesman boyfriend Howdy Palmer (Hamilton). Thunderstruck she attempts to toss herself in the river but is prevented by Salvation Army officer Carl Loomis (Gable) who after a long walk and talk and a night to think it over gets her to sign up. Rewarding as it is she runs into Howdy a year later who wears her resistance down.

The blonde Crawford does her usual solid desperate depression era every-woman sch tick with her tremulous voiced struggle with the world while letting her piercing eyes and delicate toned figure fill in the rest. Neil as the heel (couldn't resist) wears the moustache in this film as he fast talks Bunny into bed. Loathsome and unctuous as he is he does not kid himself he is anything else and in doing so attains a scintilla of dignity in a role that is all sleazy creep.

Scene stealers Guy Kibee ( a mortician salesman who deals in "underground novelties") and Roscoe Karns along with Hamilton do yeoman work in perpetuating the traveling salesmen stereotype while Gert Short buying an O'Henry candy bar has a brief but hilarious center stage moment. It's Crawford's vehicle from start to finish but with 20/20 hindsight Gable's toned down soul saver shows him gaining fast.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not enough laughing, not enough sinners
marcslope11 March 2012
MGM at its most intolerable, with Louis B. Mayer imposing his hypocritical morality on a dime-novel romance. Bad girl Joan Crawford is cavorting with the supremely unattractive traveling salesman Neil Hamilton, but is redeemed by--how's this for casting against type--Salvation Army major Clark Gable. Together the photogenic twosome wander off to host Salvation Army luncheons, dance around the maypole, and sing "London Bridge" to underprivileged tots. Designed to show off Crawford's versatility--she sings, dances, and almost acts--it instead reveals how deficient she is at this point in her career in most of these endeavors, and Gable looks bored. Anyway, it's short, and Hamilton at least gets to rub elbows with a fine crew of fellow salesmen, including Roscoe Karns, Guy Kibbee, and Cliff Edwards.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Salvation Army's lonely hearts club band
dbdumonteil27 March 2011
Clark Gable is particularly handsome in his Salvation Army uniform.He is very efficient when it comes to showing seduced girl Crawford the straight and narrow!And he must display lots and lots of patience ,indulgence and compassion for ,even after the marriage of her beau ,a smug buck,she's ready to fall in love again head over heels . Gable and Crawford singing canticles while delivering free meals to the needy.What a nice way to redeem your soul and to find true love!

What's really tragic is that these poor people are still looking for free meals in the soup kitchen ,be it the the Salvation Army or one of the other charitable organizations .In France ,in the organization I'm currently working for("Les Restos Du Coeur" ) ,the number of beneficiaries has increased by 15% in 2010-2011.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed