The Royal Bed (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Revolution among the peasants and the princess.
mark.waltz15 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This charming comedy of a fictional European monarchy going through political upheaval thanks to a changing world climate deals with a milquetoast King (Lowell Sherman) dominated by a tyrannical queen (Nance O'Neill) and a traitorous prime minister (Robert Warwick) who is the queen's spy but not above betraying her majesty if it will increase his power. Meanwhile, the young princess (Mary Astor) longs for a real life that an arranged marriage with a playboy prince won't provide. She's in love with one of the King's loyal assistants (Anthony Bushell) and longs to run off with him to escape the fate planned for her by her mother's dominating ambitions. O'Neill is a total cliché as the Queen, a stereotypical over-sized harpy, but Sherman underplays the Charlie Ruggles like role as the unfortunate King.

The lovely Astor is dressed in some rather masculine clothes, but you can see why Bushell is willing to become a commoner should she succeed in her desires. Warwick, as the evil prime minister, comes off as a silent movie like villain who does everything except twirl his mustache, laughing evilly after one confrontation with Ruggles as if he had just tied Pauline to the tracks after she couldn't come up with the rent.

There are some funny observations about how Europeans felt about America (where the queen is preparing to visit as the film begins), adding some sardonic commentary to the script. At times, the film seems to be missing songs, and Jeanette MacDonald and Maurice Chevalier singing them, or at least George Arliss. Overloaded with elaborate sets, costumes and extras, this is the type of film which seems to have influenced the Marx Brothers in their European spoof of fictional European countries, "Duck Soup". In spite of some implausibilities, the film comes off as sparkling and romantic with a delightful twist at the end to tie everything together with a most delicious pay-off.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very stagy and oddly unfunny for a comedy..but at least it ends reasonably well.
planktonrules6 May 2014
As you sit and watch "The Royal Bed", it's very obvious that it was originally a play. It has a talky, stagy style and it seems, at times, like actors pause to wait for the audience to react--when there is no audience. It's also a sad waste of some talents, as Lowell Sherman (a very much unknown and under-appreciated actor today) and Mary Astor were clearly better than this material.

When the film begins, the overbearing queen of a fictional country has announced that she's arranged for a marriage between her daughter and the prince of some other fictional nation. Princess Anne (Astor) is distraught--as she doesn't know this man and she's been secretly in love with a commoner (a rich one, nevertheless). Well, the snobby queen will have nothing to do with this love match, but the king (Sherman) vows to work behind the scene so that Anne will be happy. Unfortunately, a revolution breaks out and the king's promises seem unlikely to be fulfilled. Anne vows to kill herself if she cannot marry her beloved Freddie!

The first 75% of this film was a real snoozer. The stagy dialog and lack of action certainly contributed to this. Fortunately, the film picked up considerably and Sherman certainly was in his element once the film took off. The one who did not come off so well was Astor, as her character just seemed selfish and immature. At one point, she and her father were talking about the impact of her marrying a commoner might have on the revolution and she replied 'let them throw their bombs!'-- wow, what a competent and selfless woman!

Overall, if you can get through the boring first part of the film, the last portion does deliver.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Comical Nature Sorta Saved It
view_and_review12 August 2022
Only the comical nature of this movie saved it from being completely insufferable. On the one hand we had the oppressed princess and on the other hand we had a down to earth and comical king.

As for the princess, Princess Anne (Mary Astor), she was the typical oppressed princess. You know the one--she can't do anything she wants to do and she's being forced to marry someone she doesn't want to marry. Only if she were a common peasant then she'd be free.

Gag.

Oppression is oppression no matter who is being oppressed, but I still find it difficult to watch a princess complain about how terrible her life is, or how she'd prefer being a beggar over being a princess. It's language like that that makes rich and royalty so unrelatable.

As for the king, King Eric VIII (Lowell Sherman), he was a solid dude. He loved his daughter, liked playing checkers with his palace guard, and was in favor of a republic. He was also in favor of his daughter running off and eloping with her secret lover, Freddie Granton (Anthony Bushell), the king's secretary. The king was in an untenable position that required some deft moves to navigate. He would have to use all of his wits to keep the peace, give his daughter what she wanted, and remain king at the same time. He did what he could and kept it funny all the while.

Free with Amazon Prime.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hard to find melodrama about Royal Kingdom
zpzjones21 April 2004
This is an early talkie by RKO based on a Broadway play by Robert Sherwood. I caught it one night on the late show on a Baltimore station. Sadly this station doesn't play these old/early sound movies as Turner Classics owns them all now. Needless to say this movie is a spoof or sendup of the trials and tribulations of a European Kingdom teetering on the brink of collapse. This kingdom is at war with it's own people, with neighboring countries as well as suffering from internal intrigue in the court. Director Sherman, in my opinion, is seemingly warming himself up for Becky Sharp three to four years later. There's a scene in Royal Bed in which General Northup(Robert Warwick wonderfully melodramatic)goes to a window of the court and says of his own army: "the stupid artillery, they're shooting the wrong way". Hilarious when you watch it. For fans of Becky Sharp(1935) there's a similar sequence as Rawdon Crawley stands by a window ... and it's filmed in color. Lowell Sherman well past 40 at this time had been acting in theatre since he was a child. He may be remembered today by some buffs as the villain in DW Griffith's silent "Way Down EA(1920) and for other silent films. Little remembered about Sherman is that he was an up & coming director of light, sophisticated, witty comedies in the early 1930s. Royal Bed is one, "Bachelor Apartment" still another as well "High Stakes", "The Pay Off" and one of Katharine Hepburn's earliest films "Morning Glory". This must have seemed natural for Sherman who had spent decades acting on the Broadway stage in this same kind of fare. As fate would have it Sherman was to die in 1934 just as he was hitting his stride... and while he began Becky Sharp, Rouben Mamoulian would end up completing it.

Sherman plays the lead in Royal Bed as the King, Nance O'Neil his discerning wife The Queen, Mary Astor their daughter, the wonderful Robert Warwick(later in Sullivan's Travels and numerous others)as the pompous General Northup and a host of characters. Basically the King is a softy. He's intimidated by his high ranking officials such as Northup. And also by his wife who seems to have been betrothed to the King decades earlier in an arranged marriage. Sherman's tender scenes are with his daughter Mary Astor. Her mother and General Northup want her to enter an arranged marriage so as to make the country look good. And Northup would gain more feathers in his cap so to speak. The girl wants out of the arranged marriage to a fop of an aristocrat. She eventually gets to marry the man she loves, her father's male secretary, after cooing him over. This disappoints her mother who decides to take a vacation to America on an ocean liner. Northup conspires to have the King deposed so that he can take over in a Coup. As the kingdom crumbles Sherman remains a calm and collected monarch eager to toss out one liners and play checkers with his butler. He's a down to earth monarch in a kingdom crying out for leadership.(Can't help wondering how much the recent history of the fall of the Romanovs influenced Sherwood as well as Sherman).

This may be a forgotten little comedy. One of many by RKO. RKO wanted to capitalize off of the hit play. The melodrama aka over-acting may seem corny today. But not really. Melodrama can be fun for the audience. And for the actors quite tiring when you think about it. All of that energy to pronounce vowels and consonants in an exaggerated manner.The interacting between the actors is hilarious as they read their over-the-top dialogue. Robert Warwick's deep stage trained voice is so well recorded that he's my favorite character in this. This is not a bad 90 minutes of viewing. Turner may dust it off once in a while. That's where you'll likely see this and many other Sherman directed early talkies if they don't come to video or dvd.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Under the Royal Thumb!
JohnHowardReid23 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Although he is now forgotten, Lowell Sherman was a popular actor and director when he made The Royal Bed (1930). I don't know why. In both fields, he is rather heavy-handed. Maybe the other players liked him because he allowed them to go over the top. There is a lot of shouting but little subtlety in this movie. Mary Astor nonetheless manages an engaging performance, although she misses the opportunity to make it plain that weak-as-water Anthony Bushell will be enslaved under her wifely thumb to a far greater degree than the king is now ruled by the imperious queen. Maybe playwright Robert E. Sherwood made this point in a stronger fashion when The Queen's Husband made its debut on Broadway in 1928. Roland Young was ideally cast as the king, Gladys Hanson was the queen, Katherine Alexander, the daughter, while Dwight Frye enacted the meek secretary. With the exception of Mary Astor, I would certainly have preferred this cast to that of the movie
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Overlong and not particularly funny
holdencopywriting27 July 2008
Royal Bed is watchable, but only just. I think it was intended to be a farce, but it doesn't have the pacing or the wit necessary for good farce. It's a one-joke film that goes on much, much too long. None of the actors stands out, and many of them fade right into the woodwork. The set and set decoration are mediocre and lack the necessary pomp and circumstance for a film set in a palace. The costume designer succeeds in providing overblown and farcical costumes for the men (many with baggy jackets topping ridiculously tight pegleg trousers). However, the costume designer fails to provide the right farcical tone with the women's costumes. Astor wears a cute riding outfit complete with jodhpurs in the early part of the film, and then later a gorgeous wedding dress. The queen (who is supposed to be that stock character of farce--an interfering busybody) wears several wonderful outfits including a half-length fur stole over a classic walking dress, and a taffeta gown with a gloriously regal train. Overall, I give Royal Bed a 4 out of 10.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A father is sympathetic to his Royal daughter's wish to marry for love not obligation.
cgvsluis15 March 2022
Lowell Sherman and Mary Astor are the best parts of this film...them and maybe the spectacular wedding dress with Veil and the Queen's crown!

This was a film based on a play and during some moments that was obvious, probably more than it should be.

The heart of this story is about a royal Princess Anne, played by Astor, who wants to marry a commoner, Freddie, but her mother the queen has promised her off to the Crown Prince William.

Before their wedding...a peasant uprisings occurs (which I found very strange and unnecessary for the plot). Princess Anne could have gone off and married Freddie with her father's blessing...but she couldn't leave her father alone while the palace was under attack do she stays...which means marrying the Crown Prince when her mother returns...or does it?

The best part really is Sherman and Astor...they breathe wonderful life into the father and daughter relationship that is the only part of the film worthy of watching.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Indifferent monarch
bkoganbing18 August 2016
The Royal Bed is a retitled version of one of Robert Sherwood's lesser known plays which as The Queen's Husband ran for 125 performances on Broadway in the 1928 season. Starring on Broadway as the most reluctant king was Roland Young playing the part Lowell Sherman does here.

Sherman is essentially indifferent to the role of king, he'd just as soon abdicate and let Princess Mary Astor marry her heart's desire Anthony Bushell. But Queen Nance O'Neill likes the perks of being royalty so Sherman stays.

The issue may get forced as there's revolution in the air and a most authoritarian army commander in Robert Warwick to put it down. At this point Sherman snaps out of his indolence and shows some statesmanship to set the ship of state right.

Next to work like The Petrified Forest, Abe Lincoln In Illinois and Idiot's Delight this is most second rate Robert Sherwood. But it does get its satirical points across. Watch for a nice performance from Hugh Trevor as a visiting foreign prince scheduled to marry Mary Astor and as unhappy about the prospect as she is. Another tragedy as Trevor died soon after this film was released.

There are some amusing moments. Lowell Sherman is fine in the role, but I can see how Roland Young would have fit this perfectly.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Hero Gets to Underact
boblipton29 December 2002
Stagy version of Robert Sherwood comedy about the waning days of a constitutional monarchy. Everyone overacts, except for director-star Lowell Sherman who acts urbanely tipsy most of the time. The story doesn't hold up well. Watch for Mary Astor in a leading role before she learned how to steal a scene.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Cast
drednm23 September 2005
Lowell Sherman stars as a bored king on a European country. He faces a rebellious populace, a rebellious daughter (Mary Astor), and a repulsive wife (Nance O'Neill). Drawing room comedy has its moments and they all belong to Sherman and Astor. Sherman was a master at playing this kind of diffident character. Constantly rolling his eyes, pursing his lips, and waving around his always-present cigarette. It's almost a Bette Davis act before there was a Bette Davis.

J. Carroll Naish plays the Lenin-like revolutionary, Mischa Auer has a bit part as a flunkee, Anthony Bushell is the aide, Hugh Trevor is the prince, Robert Warwick is the bellowing general, and Gilbert Emery is funny as the butler.

Not great but certainly watchable and a must for fans of Lowell Sherman and Mary Astor!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Only for old film afficianados, and lovers of Astor!
sebaveron200131 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS!ROYALBED!SPOILERS!ROYALBED!SPOILERS!ROYALBED!

I went on to "www.movieflix.com" (as apposed to a cinema), to see this film, and I was very much looking forward to it. However, the queen in the film was absolutely apalling, and so was the duke (don't remember name), who gets fired at the end. The performance of the character king Eric VIII is exceptional and the actor, I'm sure, will have gone on to great things. Astor is also quite good (and rather pretty), as the young princess Ann who gets mixed up in a web of marriage plans. The plot, is too long for itself and should have probably been made (into a 20/30 minute short feature). This is because the film is mostly a one joke film (though it still packs a couple of memorable one-liners), like, "yes, the queen is a truly remarkable woman, but I just can't persuade her to play checkers". All in all it pans out as merely average, as Shermans directing is not, well, good enough, and for this movie, timing and direction are very important. I mean, they had the timing all right, but the direction was rather woeful.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed