Strictly Dishonorable (1931) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Introducing a Hollywood legend
wmorrow5910 July 2009
After a long period of neglect Preston Sturges is now firmly enshrined in the ranks of the great filmmakers of Hollywood's golden age, celebrated by fans as a first rate director and a screenwriter of genius. His claim to fame as a great playwright remains obscure, however: from 1929 to 1932 Sturges had five plays produced on Broadway, and while two were moderately successful two more were outright flops. Only one of these works was an unqualified success, but that play-his second, a comedy called "Strictly Dishonorable"- happened to be one of the biggest smash hits of the era. Sturges seldom did anything halfway! And because this hit coincided with the birth of the talkies, it was only natural that the major studios would vie for the playwright's services as a screenwriter, and produce an adaptation. Universal Pictures won the competition and duly produced the movie. And yet, despite the renewed attention Sturges has received in recent years, the film version of his biggest stage hit seems to be in limbo, seldom screened at revival houses and, at this writing, not available in an official video or DVD release. That's a pity, for while it lacks the dizzy, iconoclastic spirit Sturges the director would bring to his screenplays of the '40s, the movie version of Strictly Dishonorable is an interesting and unusual introduction to this uniquely gifted artist.

Directed by John M. Stahl, Strictly Dishonorable is, first and foremost, a filmed play, and that's both a plus and a minus. On the plus side, Sturges' script was used almost verbatim with only a handful of cuts and minor changes, so the movie serves as a decent archival record of the show. On the other hand, because the actors recite their dialog without the benefit of a live audience (i.e. laughter) this sort of film-making can sometimes result in a kind of mummified artifact, neither live theater nor lively cinema. In this case, fortunately, the acting and the offbeat quality of the story hold viewer interest, and although it remains stage-bound this movie is more enjoyable than many other early talkies. Happily, in 1931 the filmmakers were still unencumbered by the dread Production Code, so we get not only most of the original dialog but a provocative theme, one that would never have gotten a green light from the Breen Office a few years later.

The story revolves around a young Southern belle named Isabelle Perry (played by the ill-fated Sidney Fox). Isabelle has come to New York with her unpleasant fiancée Henry, who clearly expects to control her life in every respect once they're married and safely ensconced with his family in West Orange, New Jersey. First, however, they share an unhappy night on the town in Manhattan and wind up in an atmospheric speakeasy. Here they meet a hard-drinking retired judge (Lewis Stone) whose philosophical quips perk things along, and a famous Italian opera star (Paul Lukas) known professionally as Tino Carrafa, who modestly insists on being called "Gus." Gus is an old friend of the speakeasy's proprietor, and he keeps an apartment upstairs. He's also a notorious Casanova. When Gus shows Isabelle a little too much attention her fiancée loses his temper, makes an ugly scene, and gets thrown out. However, Isabelle stays. In fact, she spends the night in Gus' room upstairs, in a pair of borrowed pajamas. The two of them have fallen in love at first sight, but now the central question becomes: will the chaste Isabelle sleep with the guy, or not? And when Henry returns in the morning, who will she choose?

A plot that hinges on a woman choosing whether or not to retain her virginity startled Broadway audiences in 1929, and surely sparked the play's great success. This is more than just a routine sex farce, however. Sturges' gift for strong characterization and witty dialog are already present. It's surprising, even now, to hear Isabelle wonder aloud why men make such a fuss about her virginity, "as if it mattered to anybody but me." Sturges' play script was re-published in the 1980s in an anthology, and when I re-read it after seeing the film I found that only a handful of lines were deleted. One significant change, however, was that while the Judge Dempsey of the play was still professionally active, the film's Dempsey is retired; apparently, the filmmakers didn't want to suggest that any working judge spends so much time hanging out drinking in speakeasies. There's also an amusing inside joke here for movie buffs, because Lewis Stone went on to cinematic immortality as MGM's wise, eminently sober Judge Hardy!

I was fortunate enough to see this rarity at NYC's Film Forum with an appreciative crowd. Stone was decidedly the audience favorite. I confess I had mixed feelings about Sidney Fox's performance during the first couple of scenes, but gradually warmed up to her. Initially her Southern accent struck me as exaggerated, but after a while it seemed like a key component of Isabelle's strategic arsenal; that is, she comes off like the kind of Southern belle who deliberately emphasizes her accent for effect. (I've known people like that.) And by the end of the movie Fox's Isabelle felt like a deft, fully rounded characterization. I was sorry to learn afterward that the film career of this attractive actress was so brief, and sorrier still to discover that her life ended tragically. The only movies she appeared in that get any attention nowadays are the ones that also feature actors who went on to bigger things: Bette Davis, Humphrey Bogart, Bela Lugosi, etc. Sidney Fox deserves better, and so does Strictly Dishonorable. There are plenty of buffs, most especially fans of Preston Sturges, who would welcome this film's re-emergence from the studio vaults.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Early Sturges, and rather charming
marcslope15 February 2013
Preston Sturges' hit sex comedy of 1929 was filmed by Universal almost entirely intact, with an A cast and direction by the proficient but apparently not-very-nice John Stahl. It poses the question, will Southern belle Isabelle (Sidney Fox, who's charming) opt for life in West Orange with her obnoxious fiancé (George Meeker, quite good), or will she succumb to the ministrations of handsome Lothario opera singer Gus (Paul Lukas, perfect casting)? It's a situation not unlike "The Moon Is Blue," so scandalously filmed some 20 years later, and its frankness about virginity and conventional morality is refreshing. There's also Lewis Stone as a tippling judge, livelier than he often was at MGM, and Sidney Toler, almost unrecognizably handsome as an Irish cop. You have to accept the prejudices and skewed morality of the time--there's casually racist chatter, and drunkenness in and of itself is supposed to be hilarious--but it's a delightful artifact. And while Sturges' incomparable gift for dialog isn't in full flower yet, you can see the genius he's going to become.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Witty even if a bit stagy
AlsExGal25 February 2013
Although co-written by Preston Sturges this one seems to have a bit of the Lubitsch touch in it and it's quite odd considering it's a Laemmle era Universal film. Isabel (Sidney Fox) and Henry (George Meeker) are an engaged couple. Isabel is a Southerner, Henry hails from New Jersey. Besides the country mouse/city mouse differences between them, Henry is completely unlikeable and thinks the worst of everyone. Apparently he was nice to Isabel until the engagement ring went on and then he changed. When asked about it he tells her "well you didn't expect me to stay all sappy forever did you?" He tells Isabel to stop thinking and leave her happiness to him, is very disrespectful of her, and is always trying to pick a fight with someone.

They stop in for a drink at a speakeasy full of characters, and here is where the trouble starts. When Henry goes outside of the bar to deal with his illegally parked car, Isabel makes the acquaintance of the dashing opera singer Count Gus Di Ruvo (Paul Lukas), and it is lust at first sight. George returns, makes some insulting remarks and then demands to Isabel, she calls off the engagement, and Henry storms out. Isabel and the Count take the opportunity to go off to the Count's apartment upstairs. Incredulous that Isabel would ever do anything on her own, Henry enlists the help of the police to round up the scoundrels who must have kidnapped her.

Now Isabel knows the Count's intentions are "strictly dishonorable" - he's quite upfront about his lady's man status - yet she's considering sleeping with him. When the Count discovers Isabel is a virgin, his demeanor changes completely. Back in the days of chivalry, most guys - honorable ones - don't mind being a casual second but are queasy about being a casual "first". He tramps upstairs to sleep at the judge's apartment. The Count acts quite horrid to Isabel, and you can't tell if it is because he is awestruck or horrified because he has finally almost gotten involved with an actual virgin.

This leaves Isabel in quite a fix. She's already said she can't go back to Mississippi because of the gossip it would cause, Henry has gotten on her last nerve even if he should choose to return, and now the Count has run out on her. How will all of this work out? Watch and find out.

For some reason MGM loaned Lewis Stone out to Universal to play the part of a drunken judge who tries to prevent Isabel from taking a false step by staging all kinds of interruptions for the couple, and in the process he almost steals the show. An odd but amusing turn for an actor who ten years later will be known far and wide as the sober Judge Hardy of the Andy Hardy films. Sidney Toler, who later plays Charlie Chan, here plays an Irish cop who has no problem with the speakeasy that the cast is patronizing, and in fact seems pretty friendly with all concerned.

This film is a bit stagy and static, which is understandable given that it is based on a play, but it is worth sticking with it for the witty dialogue and the rather clever although partially expected denouement. A very worthy early talkie with a fine cast.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amusing and sophisticated -- Preston Sturges' first big hit.
John-14526 February 1999
A near-verbatim filming of Preston Sturges' 1929 Broadway hit, this is a surprisingly assured and technically polished film for one made just a couple of years into the sound era. Paul Lukas is a perfect Gus, and Sidney Fox makes a wonderfully sexy southern minx. Lewis Stone's turn as a (somewhat) drunken Judge is particularly fun for those who know him mainly as that paragon of sobriety, Judge Hardy. Though it lacks the genius of Surges' self-directed screenplays, this one is charming and human, and a must for the serious Sturges fan -- though it's not easy to find (I saw a rare screening last fall at the L.A. County Museum of Art).
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a Delicious Little Flirt!!!
kidboots25 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Many, many years ago I read an article about Sidney Fox in "Film Fan Monthly". Not much was known about her then, but from interviews gathered from people who knew her and fan magazines at the time, comes a portrait of a tiny (4'11") pretty, kittenish girl whom men were most eager to protect. A friend of Sidney's, from her Art School days, said "Sidney knew how to convert her air of helplessness to her own advantage - which means she was not at all helpless"!!!

"Strictly Dishonorable" was Universals prize of 1931 - based on Preston Sturges' Broadway hit of 1929 - Lewis Stone was borrowed from MGM, Paul Lukas from Paramount and it was supposedly the last word in sophisticated sexual innuendo. And, of course Sidney Fox landed the plum role of Isabelle Perry, the southern belle - well, she was Junior Laemmles' "protege".

Beautiful southern belle Isabelle is getting a lesson in the facts of life as she and her fiancée drive to their hotel - he has just informed her that all the "lovey dovey" stuff was just for the courtship and things are going to be different after their marriage. They go to a bar and encounter a philosophising Judge (Lewis Stone) and Henry (George Meeker) gets him offside instantly with his rude and boorish behaviour. "There must be something about your manner that must be fascinating to some people" Stone remarks. Ladies man Gus (Paul Lukas) drops in and is completely enchanted by Isabelle's charms, so when she and Henry have a falling out, she finds herself spending the night in the Count's suite.

The film is a complete recreation of the stage play but the film dragged for me, I'm afraid. There was a "shocking" scene at the start about the fact that Isabelle and Henry were living together without being married (shock, horror!!!) but, oh yes, his parents lived with them so that was alright. There was also a scene in the Count's room where he was looking for Isabelle's size in pajamas and slippers from a wardrobe full of women's attire. But these scenes fizzled out - I didn't find it very scintillating. Sidney Fox did what she could with her part and she did look adorable but she was playing a "sweet innocent", so there was no trading of witty wisecracks if say Kay Francis or Lilyan Tashman were the star. The best part I thought was the bar scene where all the different personalities could shine. When Henry left (even though he was horribly obnoxious) the life went out of the film.

By the end of the shooting, rumours were flying thick and fast about Fox and Laemmle and even though it was only her 4th film she was already getting a reputation for being difficult and "snooty". "Strictly Dishonorable" had a gala Hollywood premiere and both the film and Fox received glowing reviews. But, after all, the role was tailor made for her - it was a role she had been playing in real life - a delicious little flirt who could wrap most men around her little finger.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It is a piece of fun fluff but it is still a Classy Classic to be enjoyed.
ronrobinson318 December 2023
There is no need to go on and on about this film. The plot is pretty simple and I don't even want to spoil that. Trust me in saying the film is funny, has great characters, and both Fox and Lukas work well together.

I do not know Sidney Fox's career but after seeing this, I look forward to more viewings of her. She has a Southern accent in this film, and I am not sure if it is for the part, or that was just her. Unfortunately she only had a career from 1931 to 1935. She deserved more recognition.

The story moves smoothly. You will recognize Lewis Stone, who later was known as "Judge Hardy". He plays a judge in this film too.

I found myself laughing out loud at certain situations and lines. Lewis Stone is called a "barfly" in one scene and his reaction to this characterization is hilarious. They just don't make "fun" movies like this any more.

Check it out. It is a piece of fun fluff but it is still a Classy Classic to be enjoyed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Strictly awful....
planktonrules17 February 2013
Perhaps "Strictly Dishonorable" played well back in 1931, but today it's a very boring talk-fest--and about as enjoyable as having a migraine. If you do watch it, don't say I didn't warn you! The film begins with a dopey couple (he from New Jersey, she from Mississippi) who seem to have nothing in common. In fact, soon after they arrive, she starts flirting with a real Lothario (Paul Lukas) and he stomps off to sulk. In the meantime, an ex-judge (Lewis Stone) takes it on his own to try to save her from this playboy's advances, though she CLEARLY knows his intentions are strictly dishonorable.

This was originally a stage production written by Preston Sturges. However, despite him being a highly respected writer, here his work just seems VERY dated. It also looks just like a play put directly on the screen--with little action and LOTS of talk, talk, talk. In fact, it's such a talk-fest that I honestly have rarely ever felt this bored by a film. Occasionally hammy acting didn't help any. Overall, I can't even think of a reason to watch this film--it's bad but not in a funny or ridiculous way...it's just BAD!
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strictly Honorable.
DoorsofDylan30 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
With Christmas in 2023 coming up,I began looking for a title that I could watch with my dad on the day. Finding The Miracle of Morgan's Creek 1943-also reviewed) to be stunning, I was happy to find a DVD had tracked down a title written by Preston Sturges. This led to a dishonorable festive viewing.

View on the film:

One of the 36 founding members of the Oscars, director John M. Stahl & Metropolis (1927-also reviewed) cinematographer (joined by an uncredited Jackson Rose) Karl Freund disappointingly stay close to the stage-bound origins of the project, via long-take mid-shots with limited movement, which makes everything far too visible, of being filmed on a set.

Attempting to bring a Screwball Comedy energy to the tale with panning shots outside the building matching the back and fourth exchanges taking place at the windows, Stahl, Rose and Freund struggle to get the camera moving smoothly, resulting in awkward, jittering stop/ start camera movements, that feel out of place with the playful dialogue.

Universal paying the joint highest fee (in this era) of $125,000 for a literary property, (the other being RKO for Cimarron (1931) ) results in the screenplay by Good Girls Go To Paris (1939-also reviewed) writer Gladys Lehman wisely retaining the one-liner zingers from the original play by Preston Sturges, which bounce around in the Pre-Code era from the Speakeasy to the master bedroom.

An Opera singer in the original Sturges play, (his second for Broadway, written after he was fired as an assistant stage manager for the touring production of play called Frankie and Johnny ) the changes Lehman makes, bring out a wicked touch of deep fried Southern Melodrama, via the battle of the sexes double entendres criss-crossing Gus, Henry The Judge, as they try to woo Isabelle.

As sober as a judge, Lewis Stone gives a hilarious performance as The Judge, who Stone has bellow each amusing exchange with a stuck-up pompousness, that burst with each dismissal of his self-assumed charms by Isabelle. Tragically killing herself at just 34 years old, Sidney Fox gives a sparkling turn as Isabelle, a Southern belle who Fox has glitters with a self-awareness in her put-downs towards all the self-important men with their strictly dishonorable intentions.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uneven and stagy, but has its moments
BritTigger7 April 2005
This film is a fairly faithful adaptation of a Sturges play and, unfortunately, it's stage origins show a little too plainly. One can even fairly easily tell where the Act divisions would have been.

The rhythms and confined locations betray its source-while there are witty passages, other parts do not have a snappy enough pace too advance the fairly sparse (and predictable) plot. Charming performances and has its moments, but Sturges was part of other substantially better scripts in the 30s, that have aged much better. It seems likely that the, for its time, racier elements of the plot held the attention more in its day.

Did like the jokes at the expense of West Orange, New Jersey though!
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Death would be more entertaining
westerfieldalfred30 August 2019
Early film musicals kept the Broadway viewpoint, shooting all the their musical numbers under the proscenium arch. Just a few years later they looked old fashioned. Strictly Dishonorable shows the same problem with shooting a play exactly as seen on Broadway. It dismisses almost entirely with the opportunities of the camera. Lighting is flat, camera movement minimized, and closeups almost non existent. For a wordy play, where almost nothing physical happens, this is death. Cinematographer Karl Freund must have gone home every night in tears. It is slooooooooow. The few witty lines are swallowed up by the inane.

I thought the entire cast, with the exception of the bit players, miscast. Sydney Fox, in particular, didn't have the chops for such a large and varying role. Paul Lucas didn't seem to me sleazy enough to be a rue'. Lewis Stone couldn't carry off a drunk. And Sydney Toler as an Irish cop?

I found the constant changes in attitude of the principals to unbelievable. Fox's coquettishness, like her accent, came and went.

Now, I must say, although I love pre-code films, there are some I do not burn to disk. This would have been one of them. However, my wife, who hates these films, saw it as a teenager, insisting on watching it in its entirety. I stayed for about an hour of it, before leaving out of complete boredom. I think this was sentimentality on her part, just like my watching The Phantom Empire serial several times a year, even though I know it's pretty bad.. So, at her request, I'm burning this one while holding my nose.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Close Encounters
lugonian2 June 2019
STRICTLY DISHONORABLE (Universal, 1931), directed by John M. Stahl, stars Paul Lukas (courtesy of Paramount Pictures), Sidney Fox and Lewis Stone (on loan from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer), in this screen adaptation from the original stage play by Preston Sturges, years before winning fame as a comedy director for Paramount Pictures in the 1940s. With the screenplay by Gladys Lehman, which was reportedly said to have stuck close to the play and mood, this screen adaptation, virtually a filmed stage play, comes to life through much of its then risque dialogue that would never have gone passed the production code of 1934.

Plot summary: Isabelle Parry (Sidney Fox) is a Southern gal engaged to marry the bespectacled stuffy bond salesman, Henry Greene (George Meeker). While driving down the crowded New York City streets of Broadway (with movie marque of Maurice Chevalier starring in "The Smiling Lieutenant" visible) on their way home to New Jersey, the couple decide to stop at a speakeasy. Managed by Tomasso (William Riccardi), the bar also consists of a former judge, Dempsey (Lewis Stone) having a few "old fashions." While Dempsey befriends Isabelle, he gets turned off by Henry's arrogance. Also entering the scene is Gus Di Ruva (Paul Lukas), a famed opera singer better known by his stage name of Tino Caraffa. Like the kindly judge, who lives in the apartments above, he also gets turned off by Henry's unlikable personality. As Officer Mulligan (Sidney Toler) asks the owner (Henry) whose car is parked next to a fire hydrant to have it moved, during his absence, Isabelle and Gus become better acquainted during their dancing to the record playing tune of "It Happened in Monterey," Discovering this, Henry's jealousy and rude remarks force Isabelle to call off their engagement. Wanting to have Mulligan arrest Gus and Tomasso for the abduction of Isabelle, Henry ends up jailed instead. In the meantime, with no place else to go, the free-spirited Isabelle, who has been living with Henry and his parents under the same household, is offered a place to stay - being Gus's apartment on a "strictly dishonorable" basis. While the judge feels Isabel to be immoral and that she's be better off staying at the Martha Washington Hotel instead, Gus comes to the conclusion of buying her train tickets back to where she came from, but begins to have second thoughts. Situations occur when Henry, released from jail, returns to the scene.

In general, STRICTLY DISHONORABLE is a showcase for Sidney Fox. She not only gets enough camera closeups, but is virtually in every scene. Her Southern accent comes similar to her performance in THE MOUTHPIECE (Warners, 1932), for which she once more plays a girl from the South. Lewis Stone, who interestingly was featured in a similar sounding movie title, STRICTLY UNCONVENTIONAL (MGM, 1930), is perfect as the moral-minding judge, a role no different from his Judge Hardy portrayal in the "Andy Hardy" family series (1937-1946) for his home studio of MGM. The top-billed Paul Lukas is perfectly cast as the accented-speaking opera singer whose character is hinted as one being a ladies man and no stranger of having women living in his quarters. His girlfriend, Lilli (never seen) is passed off as his cousin to Isabel.

One interesting aspect for STRICTLY DISHONORABLE is the camera tracking through windows and stairways to keep this 91 minute production from being virtually stage-bound. Maybe not as amusing as it was back in 1931, STRICTLY DISHONORABLE comes as surprising through its frankness as the Isabelle character showing no shame in saying she lives with her fiance. This dark-haired beauty with a male-sounding name, Fox proves herself worthy in what might be considered her best screen performance to her short-lived movie career. Situations move briskly throughout the story, especially how one could fall in love and want to marry a total stranger the very same evening of their first encounter. George Meeker is strictly obnoxious in character while William Riccardi (reprising his stage role) is strictly available throughout for comedy relief gestures involving both judge and opera singer friends.

Unavailable for viewing due to the 1951 MGM remake starring Enzio Pinza and Janet Leigh, which has been softer in tone, this 1931 original, which has never been distributed to either video cassette and DVD, has been rediscovered to a new generation of movie lovers in 1997 on cable television's Turner Classic Movies. Though broadcasts for the original STRICTLY DISHONORABLE have been limited, the film in general is strictly worth viewing mainly out of curiosity. (***)
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Now Available On DVD and quite funny!
SamHardy3 February 2013
It's a real treat to watch Lewis Stone, who made a career out of playing fine upstanding men, play a drunken judge. He has the lion's share of very funny lines and takes. Sidney Fox is quite good, although I had a hard time understanding her lines from time to time. But overlooking everything a surprisingly memorable performance from Paul Lukas is turned in here. Lukas was playing against type here as a genial cultured gentleman who finally meets his match with women as he falls hopelessly in love with Sidney Fox. Is it love or is it lust? He does a great turn as a man whose old world charm, courtliness, and politeness collides with his sexual desire. He makes the most out of his part and is genuinely funny. For a man who played heavies and Nazi officers most of his career he must have really enjoyed this stretch.

The humor in this film holds up surprisingly well to this day. It was made at a time when sound technology was still finding it's way, I found myself laughing out loud. Wonderful writing by Preston Sturges!

Now available on DVD.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Suave characters speaking easily to a true innocent.
mark.waltz22 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Her career may have been rather short, but Sidney Fox had an impressive list of artistic classics including this film version of a Preston Sturges stage classic. She co-stars with the Hungarian born Paul Lukas and Lewis Stone, with Lukas cast as an opera star who keeps Fox away from her boring date at a speakeasy with the aide of drunken attorney Lewis Stone, here nowhere close to his signature role of Judge Hardy. George Meeker is the square fellow who ends up in jail for bothering Fox after she ends up falling for Lukas.

A smart and funny, if stagebound early talkie focuses mainly on Fox and Lukas, but it's Stone who steals the film with his drunken antics, as good as he was in "Grand Hotel". Lukas is delightful as a complete ham, totally over the top. Fox is sweet and subtle. Sidney Toler, just stepping into his role of Charlie Chan, has a great smaller role as a police officer. John M. Stahl directs this with pizazz and sparkle. Without a doubt one of the best plays of the twenties and one of the best film versions of a hit Broadway show. Sturges may not have gotten to adapt his screenplay or direct it, but it definitely has the stamp of class later evidence by his films that he got to write and direct himself.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed