The Billion Dollar Scandal (1933) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Pre-Code Melodrama That Needs To Be Rediscovered
darkcollins25 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Robert Armstrong is a recently paroled masseuse who is employed by stock market tycoon John Dudley Masterson (Frank Morgan) after he assists Masterson and his alcoholic daughter Doris (Constance Cummings) following a car accident. Fingers soon makes his own fortune from listening in on Masterson's business dealings with other stock market big wigs.

I must correct another reviewer's error in that Warren Hymer is *not* the character who falls in love with Masterson's daughter Doris. Frank Albertson as Fingers's kid brother "Babe" is the one who falls in love with Doris, creating a rift between his brother and a rift between the daughter and her father. Warren Hymer plays Fingers's ex-con pal "Kid" McGurn who fails in his return to the ring after being released from prison. Armstrong's frequent co-star and real life pal James Gleason is also along for the ride as Fingers's kleptomaniac pal Ratsy.

When Fingers's brother begins a romantic relationship with Doris, Masterson lets Fingers listen in on a fake stock tip so Fingers will invest and lose all of his money, which does happen. Newspaper reporter Albert Griswold (Irving Pichel in one of his few "good guy" roles!) attempts to get Fingers to testify before a Senate committee to bring down the corrupt businessmen. But not before Masterson hires gangster Carter Moore (Sidney Toler) to prevent Fingers from testifying.

This film used to be a staple of repeated late night movie airings from the early 1960s to the late 1970s and has unfortunately disappeared from television screens and so far hasn't been made available on any retail home media. This film's theme was very timely for the early 1930s but in today's climate of business and government corruption that often goes unpunished, this one could use a rediscovery.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dumb ex-cons take down Wall Street big shots.
mark.waltz22 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This unique pre-code melodrama shows what happens when educated rich men try to wipe the floor with parolees who don't seem as good with their brains as they are with fire arms. It's almost a post stock market crash ponzi scheme. "King Kong's" Robert Armstrong is joined on the outside by James Gleason and Warren Hymer in an association with wealthy Frank Morgan who suggests an investment in oil which he knows will bust, a scam to swindle investors. This exposes a cartel lead by Sidney Toler, Morgan's boss. Hymer falls in love with Morgan's daughter (Constance Cummings), an engagement that Morgan approves of simply to silence Hymer. The senate hearing into this fraud threatens to expose all sorts of scams in the market, resulting in murder!

Spunky dialog keeps this moving at a tremendously fast pace, with two sides of the tracks going against each other in their efforts to come out clean from a federal investigation. I don't pretend to understand the goings on of the stock market, but it's obvious that many innocent people lost their shirts in what they thought was a sure fire investment. It's timely even today, showing that not much has changed but the date. Brilliantly acted, especially by Armstrong and Morgan. A blonde Olga Baclanova (the evil beauty of the cult classic "Freaks") has a small role as a hot tempered Russian broad.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Armstrong at His Best in a Forgotten Little Gem
joe-pearce-13 August 2017
Over the years, Robert Armstrong attained a kind of semi-iconic status due to his starring role in a great film, KING KONG (pretty much reprising that role in MIGHTY JOE YOUNG), but he is rarely thought of as a starring actor, as against more of a supporting player (especially since his second-most-seen role in a famous film is as the ill-fated brother of the heroine in THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME). But in his silent-to-talking crossover period, he starred in any number of films, mostly comedies, and mostly as a rough-and-ready (and not too bright) leading or semi-leading man. It is the kind of role he plays here, but I must say that of the over 100 films I have with him, this is the best, and certainly the biggest, role I have ever seen him in. The whole film revolves around him, and this in a good-looking B film with a plethora of other terrific actors. It's the kind of role an actor like Victor McLaglen or even Clark Gable (back then) or Anthony Quinn or Ernest Borgnine (in more modern times) would have excelled in, and probably in an A production to boot. Anyway, Armstrong plays a recently-paroled minor criminal (we are never told what he did to get into jail to begin with) who, along with two lovable cronies (James Gleason and Warren Hymer), attempts to go back into the boxing business, fails, and ends up as a physical trainer for a rich industrialist (Frank Morgan) and some of his wealthy friends. Overhearing much of these people's plans to more or less manipulate the market, he invests his own dough and becomes reasonably well off, making it possible for him to advance his younger brother's career as a broker. Things go awry when peripheral events induce Morgan to exact a penalty on his trainer, resulting in his return to near destitution and providing the impetus for the rest of the story as Armstrong reveals all at the behest of a newspaper publisher and then ends up testifying before a U.S. Senate committee regarding all of it. (None of this is in any way a 'spoiler' as everything is pretty much telegraphed to the audience well ahead of the reality setting in.) By that time, there have been other story lines introduced, along with one particularly memorable character (portrayed by a pre-Charlie Chan Sidney Toler) and even a murder. None of that is important to this review. What is important is that we are given the chance to see several famous character actors playing against type, and they do so superbly. Foremost is lovable Frank Morgan, who is anything but lovable in his lead-industrialist role, and very convincing. And Irving Pichel, of the voice-of-doom reputation, comes over well as the solidly honest, if somewhat overly ambitious publisher. Then there is Berton Churchill, who almost always played authority figures of a slightly 'bent' persuasion, here shown as a very sympathetic prison warden who bends over backwards to get Armstrong his parole. Wasted here is Moscow Art Theater veteran Olga Baclanova as Armstrong's floozy girlfriend, but she's fun when we can understand her, even though we keep expecting her to run off with a dwarf (that's for another review). And Constance Cummings is fine as Morgan's daughter, but gives no indications here that she will one day receive a CBE from the Queen. Still, the absolute gem of the casting is Sidney Toler, whose impending arrival on the scene is discussed in tones not inappropriate to the introduction of Josef Mengele into the action, and when he arrives he more than fulfills this promise. Toler is a 'fixer', maybe a hit-man himself, but definitely one who can arrange such things, and his three-or-four-minute scene with the industrialists is in many ways the highlight of the film. This is the 59-year-old Toler still showing vestiges of the younger leading stage actor he once was, very handsome in a mature sort of way, and by far the single classiest actor in the film; a far cry from Charlie Chan, indeed. Armstrong starts out a bit hammy, perhaps (it really IS that kind of role), but eases into the ensuing drama beautifully, and this is the kind of performance that, in an A production with a better screenplay (it has the usual B-film fatality of inadequate exposition at almost all times, so that we more than once find characters conversant with each other, if not downright in love with each other, whom we have no reason to expect have even as yet met!) would surely be better remembered 80 years later. A small price to pay, though, for the film is very 'alive', with a kind of forward momentum missing in many A productions. Also, although Armstrong and Gleason partnered in many early films (Armstrong had acted with Gleason's theatrical company), the addition of Warren Hymer to their ranks made for a perfect trio of somewhat dicey figures who might have done well in further escapades. But this one is enough. A delightful semi-romp, and a great example of why actors should often be cast against type (think Gregory Peck as Captain Ahab!).
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marks on the Box
tedg30 January 2008
Sometimes a movie has no intrinsic merit, but after a while is valuable watching because of how it reflects the times. I like it better when the reflection is some element from film history.

This is a piece of the era, a time before the code, deep in the depression. A time when it was clear (as it is now) that a whole nation suffers so a few can get rich. A time when it was noble to think of a little, exceedingly simple Joe standing up bigtime moneymen.

It was a time when the US was pretty close to flipping into communism of some stripe.

The story involves a guy in the fight business. An older, retired fighter who is dumber now than when born. He's a trainer, which in those days also meant masseur. He's a con. Reliable James Gleason plays his con sidekick, East Side accent jabbering.

There's a brother and a rich man's daughter. Big oil swindles. Intimidation and killing. All ordinary and uninteresting.

What IS interesting as all getout is that this was made at all, the palooka who brings down the big bosses — in front of the people's senate no less.

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed