Captured in Chinatown (1935) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
With a villain named Zamboni it has to be good.
dbborroughs3 July 2006
Short crime/newspaper story centered in Chinatown. The story concerns two warring Chinese families, the Lings and the Wongs. The daughter of one loves the son of the other. When a marriage is agreed upon a valuable jade necklace is to be passed to the couple as a means of sealing the new friendship. However when news of the wedding and the necklace is published villains plot to steal the necklace.

After an intriguing first ten minutes or so set in Chinatown among the two families, where a large portion of the dialog is spoken in Chinese the focus shifts two two reporters who end up in Chinatown covering the wedding (aided by a dog named Tarzan). From that point on the Chinese are pushed to the background as the Caucasians take center stage as heroes and villains. You'll forgive the lack of details but this film is so short and so breezy that I'd like to leave some mystery for anyone who sees this. Its not a "who done it" more a "when will they catch on". There is murder and intrigue and of course a happy ending for everyone.

This is a decent little movie thats worth watching. If it has any real flaws its that the movie seems to be made up of little sections that you can knock out and put together in variety of different ways. There's the Chinatown stuff, the newspaper stuff, the bad guy stuff, the dog stuff, and a few other plot threads which click together like a puzzle but don't really flow together like a natural story. Its not bad, but its not as good a it should have been.

6 out of 10.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Smartest Member Of The Press
boblipton26 October 2019
Two young Chinese lovers bring peace to their warring families so they can marry. When this hits the newspapers, the big point is that the gifts include a jade necklace worth $50,000. This excites crooks, who decide to steal it. Fortunately, reporters Charles Delaney and Marion Shilling are assigned to cover the nuptials, and Bob's invaluable and much brighter assistant, Tarzan are on hand. Can they foil this dastardly plot and prevent another tong war?

It's a really cheap Weiss Brothers drama, but given the standards of the era, it's quite watchable. The Chinese performers have roles which make them human, there are some nice gimmicks, and Tarzan is a fine performer.

We're not talking Johnny Weissmuller, nor Ken Maynard's horse. This Tarzan is a handsome German Shepherd with a nice bag of tricks, from stealing parking tickets to locking up the bad guys. It's the third movie he appeared in, all cheap Poverty Row efforts.

Elmer Clifton directs the movie at a good clip. He was one of the directors who studied under D. W. Griffith. Like half the directing talent of the period, he was an assistant director on BIRTH OF A NATION, as well as acting in it. His directing career seems to have peaked in the mid-1920s. After that he wound up on Poverty Row, where he mostly directed westerns. He died in 1949, at the age of 59.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Before there was Lassie, there was Tarzan!
planktonrules15 March 2013
When I saw that this film starred Tarzan, I was confused--after all, the film is about Chinatown! However, I checked and realized that Tarzan is a dog--a dog that starred in three different films--and "Captured in Chinatown" was his last.

The film begins in Chinatown. A romance has blossomed that looks like another Romeo & Juliet, as the two lovers come from rival families--ones that have hated each other for years. However, eventually they are able to get the families to bury the hatchet (literally and figuratively). To seal the truce, one family is going to give the other a rare jade necklace. However, some scum-bags (including a guy named Zamboni) are out to steal it.

Into this mess come two reporters, Bob and Ann. But the real hero among them is Bob's dog, Tarzan. Again and again, Tarzan seems smarter and more capable than anyone--sort of like a German Shepherd version of Lassie--but even smarter. For instance, when Bob commits a HUGE cliché by beating up a bad guy and NOT picking up the gun, only minutes later, Tarzan is smart enough to do this! All in all, it's pretty much what you'd expect from a wonder-dog film from a tiny studio. Reasonably entertaining but silly as well (think about it--the day is save by a DOG!!). The one interesting positive is that Chinese people really played the Chinese characters--something very unusual for the time (when often white folks pretended to be Asian)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tarzan Goes to Chinatown.
horn-512 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
No, not Ken Maynard nor ERB's Tarzan...Tarzan, the Police Dog.

This was the third (and last) of the Tarzan the Police Dog films produced by Consolidated Pictures Corporation, another of the Weiss Brothers' many-different production company names, and one that has no relationship to Consolidated Labs. It followed "Million Dollar Haul" and "Inside Information" and the company announced that three more would be made following "Captured in Chinatown"; those were to be "Missing Messinger", "On the Spot" and "On Patrol," none of which ever saw the light of a projector lamp.

The plot has "Daily Chronicle" reporters Ann Parker (Marion Shilling) and Bob Martin (Charles Delaney, the poor-man's Jack Mulhall) sent to Chinatown by their City Editor (John Elliott) to get a story about the announcement of the wedding of Joy Ling (Bo Ling) and Tom Wong (Wing Foo). Since the Ling and Wong families had been bitter enemies for many years, the wedding was to be one that ended the feud between the families.

At the announcement, Tom presents his bride-to-be with a jade-and-diamond necklace valued at fifty thousand dollars. Joy Ling goes to her room and the necklace is snatched from her throat by Zamboni (Paul Ellis), a crook who was posing as a recording engineer, anxious to send records of the termination of the Ling-Wong feud to China. Tom rushes to Joy's aid and is stabbed by Zambozi. Tom's father, (James B. Leong billed as Jimmy Leon), arrives in time to see Zamboni, dressed in Ling-family clothes disappear. He concludes the marriage-announcement was just a Ling-family ruse to kill his son and immediately declares that the tong-war is on again and vows death to all Lings.

Philo McCullough is on hand as Raymond, the Mastermind behind the jewel theft, and has Harry (the first Robert Walker and billed as Robert Walker) as one of his henchman. But, slick and suave and oily McCullough has more than a few problems when Bob and Ann bring Tarzan (Tarzan the Police Dog) into the case.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Tarzan will take care of him"
hwg1957-102-26570425 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Joy of the Lings and Tom of the Wongs fall in love and manage to bring peace to their warring families. As part of the settlement Tom will give to Joy a rare jade necklace. The crooked Zamboni hears about the necklace and plots to steal it. Also becoming involved are an ace reporter Bob Martin, who amusingly has a dog amusingly called Tarzan, and a junior reporter Ann Parker. You could write the film yourself as cliché is followed by cliché. It even turns out that the junior reporter, unbeknown to the chief reporter, is really the daughter of the newspaper proprietor using a pen name for herself. Gosh, what a surprise. At the end the two reporters, having a prickly relationship throughout the film, have of course fallen in love. Benedick and Beatrice it ain't though. Oh and the newspaper editor shouts a lot.

Bob Martin is played annoyingly by Charles Delaney and Marion Shilling is bland as Ann Parker. The best performance is given of course by Tarzan the dog who is played by errr..Tarzan The Dog. He shows the most intelligence and halfway through has already sussed out Zamboni. The Chinese characters are played by Chinese actors which gives the film a bit more authenticity and interestingly a lot of the dialogue is in a Chinese language.

The film is sensationally called 'Captured in Chinatown' but actually just one character is locked in a room and that's only for a short time. A better title would be 'Tarzan The Fearless' but that one was used a couple of years earlier in 1933 by some tree swinging chap.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Starts with the end of a Tong war, and morphs into a white mob war.
mark.waltz21 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The Ling and Wong families have been at war for generations, and it all of a sudden and when love between two younger members of the families pulls it to a close. The greedy desire over a valuable jade necklace leads white Mobsters to attempt to steal it, but an unexpected hero comes into save the day, not before hostages are held, gunfire errupts, and an incredible chase sequence ensues.

This is a fascinating poverty row crime drama that suffers mainly from long gaps of silence where even footsteps over the action is barely heard. A hero name Tarzan isn't the loincloth type, but the four-legged breed, and he takes great direction. With the sudden focus on Caucasian characters after the first real, this really could have taken place in any big city neighborhood, but the Chinatown setting does provide an exotic background. Marion Shilling as a feisty female reporter and Charles Delaney as her rival for the story are adequate leads, but it's Tarzan whom you will mainly be rooting for.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ancient Asian feuds and 'modern' American crime
binapiraeus5 April 2014
This very unusual and indeed captivating little B movie is a mixture of quite a variety of different issues: first, there's a kind of 'Romeo and Juliet' romance in Chinatown, where two young members of two rivaling old Chinese clans are desperately in love with each other, and are finally able to convince their fathers to agree to their marriage and bury the feud that has cost so many lives. But then, there are 'ordinary' white American crooks who are after the wedding gift, a precious old necklace, that the bridegroom's father wants to present to his former enemy's daughter - and they won't stop at anything in their greed, not even at reviving the family feud and make a 'blood wedding' out of the beautiful, peace-bringing romance... And then there is one of the typical reporter 'couples' with their usual 'love-hate' relationship that gets involved in the dangerous ongoings; and 'Tarzan', the police dog, as he's billed, but he's really a newsroom hound - a news hound in the REAL sense of the word! (And one of the best trained and most intelligent movie star dogs I've ever seen!)

There's a really CHILLING suspense that lasts from the first to the last moment of the film, mixed in quite a capable way with a 'doomed' love - and also some very nice, typical reporters' humor to lighten up the dark atmosphere. And the interesting point is that the senseless old Asian feud (and mark that: 'vendettas' like this one existed, and still exist, ALL over the world, among whites just like Asians or any other race!) is opposed to the reckless violence of the white gangsters who don't kill for 'honor', but just for sheer greed! And the characters are shaped out in a way that makes us feel EQUAL concern and agony about the Asian lovers and about the white reporter couple...

A very much underestimated, and perhaps also misinterpreted movie - I'd say that everyone should have a look (or a second look) first before judging it!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For "Tarzan", I'll make an exception!
JohnHowardReid3 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Marion Shilling (Ann Parker), Charles Delaney (Bob Martin), Philo McCullough (Raymond), Robert Ellis (Zamboni), Robert Walker (Harry), Bobby Nelson (newsboy), John Elliott (city editor), Bo Ling (Joy Ling), James B. Leong (Wong), Wing Foo (Tom Wong), Paul C. Fong (Ling) and "Tarzan" (himself).

Director: ELMER CLIFTON. Screenplay: Elmer Clifton and Arthur Durlam. Original story: Arthur Durlam. Photography: Harry Forbes. Film editor: Ralph Holt. Assistant director: Gordon Griffith. Sound recording: Cliff Ruberg. Executive producer: Bert Sternbach.

A Weiss Production, produced by Consolidated Pictures Corp. Distributed by Stage & Screen Productions, Inc. U.S. release through Superior Pictures Corporation: July 1935. No New York opening. 50 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: A long-standing feud between two families is happily brought to an end by a marriage. A valuable jade necklace is exchanged as a peace offering. Unfortunately, a gang of crooks plan to steal the necklace and place the blame on one of the formerly feuding parties.

COMMENT: Romeo and Juliet in Chinatown certainly makes an unusual background for a dog picture. Even more odd is the fact that the background often becomes the foreground and that more interest is sometimes evoked by the Chinese lovers, Bo Ling and Wing Foo, than by the picture's nominal stars, Marion Shilling and Charles Delaney.

In addition to the two pairs of lovers — and their respective backgrounds — we have a gangster story about an attempt to steal a valuable heirloom necklace and a subsequent double cross.

All this would seem to leave little footage for the dog — especially in view of the director's and photographer's obvious interest in the Chinatown background which is given not only a great deal of play but endowed with an absolutely splendid atmosphere. In fact, the lighting cameraman makes a most effective use of three or four richly detailed sets.

Nonetheless, even with all this competition, "Tarzan" does doggedly come across impressively enough to rate a few cheers, even from my jaundiced throat. As a general rule, I dislike dogs, but for "Tarzan", I'll gladly make an exception.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed