Time for Love (1935) Poster

(1935)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Very Simple & Dated, But Has A Nice Message
ccthemovieman-111 August 2007
There's not really much to this simple and familiar tale of somebody lured away from her partner and then finding out the hard way that she should have stayed with him, the better man (or you can reverse the sexes.)

In this cartoon, we are talking swans instead of humans. A black swan interrupts two white swans, trying to court one of them away to him. He does so, thanks to his amazing fish- catching abilities. The only humor in the cartoon was the shot of the fingers inside the eyeballs motioning to "come over here."

The scorned swan now is ticked off, and who can blame him? This cad came along and stole his fickle girlfriend! What can do to get her back. (I wouldn't bother if she's that shallow.)

Anyway, it turns out he doesn't have to do anything. She will come back to him after being roughed up by the intruder, who shows his true colors soon. She's just lucky the male is so forgiving.

It's dated and corny with the song at the end, but it's a good message about being fooled by shallow things.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Swans in love
TheLittleSongbird5 October 2021
When Fleischer Studios was on form, their output was brilliant. So stuff like 'Somewhere in Dreamland', 'A Car-Tune Portrait', Betty Boop at her most daring and the best of the Popeye cartoons (most of them in the late 30s). The 30s period did have some disappointments, with the "Color Classics" series being very hit and miss, with 'Somewhere in Dreamland' being one of the classics but there were also misfires such as the worst of the Hunky and Spunky cartoons, which were not good.

1935's 'Time for Love' is neither one of the best "Color Classics" cartoons or one of the best of the studio. It is also not one of the worst and not indicative of a quality decline, like most of the studio's 40s output (so the "Stone Age" and "Gabby" theatrical series). Personally would put it in the middling category, along with the likes of 'Bunny Mooning', being a cartoon that is pleasant and inoffensive but also with not much that is exceptional or wow-worthy and other cartoons in the series and from the studio hold up better.

'Time for Love' has a lot of good things. The best aspects are the animation and the music, which was hardly surprising as that was very common with the studio and the only two things done outstandingly in all the "Color Classics" cartoons. While there are more visually innovative cartoons of theirs, the attention to detail in the backgrounds, the lush and atmospheric colours and the smooth way everything is drawn is really lovely to watch. The music never works against the action and fits very well with it instead, it is also characterful and cleverly and beautifully orchestrated.

Some very cute and not too over-sentimental moments can be seen and the caddish rival swan is a character with a lot of personality that doesn't lean on the wrong side of too sinister or too annoying. Did think that the lovers charmed enough and weren't too bland. The message is a good one that is still relevant today

Having said all of that, the story is incredibly slight to near non-existence in parts and the conflict could have had more tension if it wasn't so predictable. Also did think it was pretty bland atmosphere-wise, any humour is next to none and that the pace tended to be pedestrian due to not having enough content to sustain a length that is not even that long.

Other Fleischer Studios cartoons hold up a lot better as 'Time for Love', some of the song's lyrics and the attitudes towards love have aged quite a bit overtime. Not many love rivals have ways of thinking today than the way the rival swan here thinks, which was very of the time and has been mostly out of date for a while. Interesting to see it from a different point of view and see how attitudes have progressed since though.

Concluding, watchable and pleasant enough if fairly average. 5/10.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A sad reflection on past attitudes
Windrider624 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
In its time, in 1935, I'm sure that the overwhelmingly "white" audience was very appreciative of this video. Now is considered offensive, due to the colours of the swans & the obvious comparison to "colours" of humans. It validated the attitudes of the time of white people regarding people who were not "white". Depicted is a non-white male seducing a white female away from a white male, then abusing her. Then the white female returns to the white male for protection, and he beats up and triumphs over the dark male. This fit in with both the fears and fantasies of white men of that time. They were envious and fearful of dark coloured men, thinking (right or wrong), that they would lose their women to them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed