Daniel Boone (1936) Poster

(1936)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Early Daniel Boone adventure with several struggles , raids and spectacular outdoors
ma-cortes26 April 2006
The picture deals as the title says about Daniel Boone (George O'Brien) , as famous scout , he leads some settler families towards Kentucky state ; meanwhile , he falls in love with a beautiful colonist (Heather Angel) facing off her suitor (Ralph Forbes) . Besides , he'll confront Indians led by a nasty villain (John Carradine) , risks and numerous perils.

The film is based on real events , this is as follows : In 1775, after mediating the purchase of 20 million acres of Kentucky Cherokee land,which was about to be opened to white settlers as the 14th colony,Transylvania,the 40 years old Boone(1734-1820,dead at the age of 85) led colonials to blaze trail. Driving northward from Tenessee through the Cumberland Gap to the Kentucky River,they cleared the famous Wilderness Road,which ended at a settlement on the Kentucky, they called Boonesborough in honor to his name. Daniel Boone as militia leader charged with directing the defense of Kentucky's frontier settlements against Indian attacks and stalled a raid on defenseless women and children left in Boonesboro. Captured by Shawnees and after escaping,Boone reached the settlement in time to help fight off Indian attack and his legend grew to epic proportions and would gain an inflated reputation as Indian fighter ,learning his wilderness skills from friendly Native Americans whose ways he respected and understood. In fact,the myths about Boone's prowess abounded and multiplied even in his own time,but in true,Boone never relished fighting Native Americans and may have killed only one Indian during his entire career and contrary to myth he never wore a coonskin cap .His greatest legacy is,perhaps,his undying legend as the first trail-brazer of America's advance to the West coast.

The motion picture packs adventures , battles and action , though it's a little bit outdated because of being an early talkie the film-copy is worn-out. The flick will appeal to old movies buffs and frontier western enthusiasts.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Ladies and Gentlmen, I give you the future of Boonesborough."
classicsoncall16 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Seeing the film today gave me an interesting perspective on our country's history, as the events took place one year before the Declaration of Independence. With the Revolutionary War in full swing, an entirely different battle was being waged on the near Western frontier of 'Kain-Tu-Kee', the Indian name for a 'dark and bloody ground'. It was here the legend of Daniel Boone was born, and the film states it tries to remain true to the core of the frontiersman's legacy.

I was intrigued by a number of the portrayals in the film that had nothing to do with the main characters. Women in particular were shown chopping wood, spading hard ground and fording rivers on horseback carrying babies in the cause of civilization. The film also depicted blacks respectfully, though in typically subservient roles; it was the black character Pompey (Clarence Muse) who offered the suggestion for the name of Boonesborough.

There's an interesting scene where Pompey and Black Eagle (George Regas) have a conversation about the similarities of 'black' and 'red' men. Pompey's take on it is that both were baked by the sun, but the Indian was 'underdone'!

Boone is ruggedly portrayed by George O'Brien in a characterization that reminded me of George Reeves' Superman, to me he looked like two different people with and without his coonskin cap on. His first encounter with the renegade white Simon Girty (John Carradine) offered a comedic touch with the knife swallowing gimmick. Later on, his shirtless physique takes center stage when captured by hostiles and relegated to a burning stake, most assuredly one of film's early recognitions of the beefcake factor in heroic movies.

My prior introduction to Heather Angel involved her role as Miss Phyllis Clavering in the 'Bulldog Drummond' franchise, a series of detective mysteries of the same era. Here she balances her affections between British royal Stephen Marlowe and the adventurer Boone until Marlowe realizes he's second string. Her young brother Jerry is played by Dickie Jones, who in the 1950's became Range Rider's sidekick and later starred as Buffalo Bill Jr. in a couple of early TV Westerns.

For an early talkie "Daniel Boone" seems to handle it's subject fairly well with a nice blend of action, adventure and insight into early frontier life. It does seem to leave a question mark for an ending though, as the pioneers are shown heading out once again in search of new territory. One must assume that the governor in Richmond fully intended to deny squatters rights to the settlers, on land annexed to Virginia for the glory of the Crown.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dated but solid
dinky-41 June 2004
A well-crafted script efficiently sets up three areas of conflict: white settlers in 1775 Kentucky vs. local Indians stirred up by a renegade named Simon Girty; these same white settlers vs. corrupt officials back in Richmond; and he-man Daniel Boone vs. fancy-man Stephen Marlowe for the affections of the beautiful Virginia Randolph. These conflicts are woven together into a briskly-paced frontier drama which, while showing its age, still holds one's interest. Its chief fault is an ending which, at least on the tape available, seems unfocused and a bit confusing.

Though not well remembered today, leading man George O'Brien was a popular actor in late silents and early talkies. During a fight scene in 1924's "The Iron Horse" his shirt was torn off and audiences got an uncommon eyeful of "beefcake" which earned for O'Brien a nickname: the Chest. Though only 35 or 36 years old when he filmed "Daniel Boone," O'Brien shows signs of middle-age in the form of a somewhat expanded waistline but he's still featured in an extended "beefcake" scene. Captured by Indians he's tied, shirtless, to a post and soon surrounded by burning piles of wood. His bindings allow him to move in a tight circle around the post, (an authentic touch), so O'Brien sweats and squirms as he tries to avoid the tongues of flame. It's a good scene but cut far too short by an all-too-easy rescue. (A shirtless O'Brien also suffered through a prison flogging in 1928's "Honor Bound" but prints of this movie seem to be unavailable.)

John Carradine makes a hissable villain and Heather Angel is an appropriately pretty heroine but Ralph Forbes seems a bit "too, too" as the no-good Stephen Marlowe. No woman would regard him as a serious competitor for George O'Brien! Black actor Clarence Muse has a role surprisingly free of most of the era's usual stereotypes.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Doer And A Dream Come Truer
bkoganbing15 November 2008
Daniel Boone had a long and fascinating life and he's still the prototype for those classic American frontier characters. He set a standard which people in later generations like Davy Crockett, Kit Carson, and Buffalo Bill were measured by. His life would warrant a mini-series.

Any resemblance to that life and the film Daniel Boone which was RKO films big budget item for 1936 is purely coincidental. They don't even get the name of his wife in the character Heather Angel plays right.

I will say that George O'Brien does make an impressive looking Daniel Boone and it's definitely in the tradition of a hero for the kiddie trade. This colonial era film plays like a western, but even the great Cecil B. DeMille made some of the same mistakes with his big budget epic Unconquered that starred Gary Cooper and Paulette Goddard and was set in the same era.

Another and more infamous colonial frontier character makes an appearance in Daniel Boone. John Carradine plays a lean and mean Simon Girty and his performance here might have led John Ford to cast him in a similar role in Drums Along The Mohawk.

Girty may have been one of the first diagnosed cases of Stockholm syndrome. As a kid he was captured by the Indians and adapted so well to their lifestyle that he sympathized with them and their cause the rest of his life. He sided with the Tories during the American Revolution so he's come down to us as a renegade and traitor.

But as far as I know he and Daniel Boone never even met, let alone become antagonists. Simon Girty lived almost as long as Daniel Boone. Girty died in 1818 at his farm in Ontario, Canada where he's not exactly a hero, but doesn't have the bad reputation he has on this side of the Great Lakes. Boone of course died in 1820 and the action here takes place in the 1770s.

The film might have been better had one of the bigger studios done it. Daniel Boone was a project for MGM or Warner Brothers not RKO Pictures.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well acted oldie, most enjoyabe.
headhunter469 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If we consider this was made in1936, it is actually quite well done. Not once did I get the impression the characters were "acting". It is set in 1775 just before the revolutionary war breaks out. This had several plots going in it, Daniel Boone took on the responsibility for relocating a group of settlers moving from North Carolina which was fairly well settled into the wilderness of Kentuckee.

Ironically there is a white man who has come to live with the native people and he prophetically tells them they have to stop the white settlers or they will steadily push them further and further west,

There is another man competing with Daniel for the affection of the heroine. After being embarrassed by Daniel for not doing a job that resulted in the deaths of others and jilted by the fair maiden he makes his way back to North Carolina and derives a plan to claim all the land the settlers have worked so hard to settle on. For two years they worked exceedingly hard to build a secure community in the wilderness and he plans to take it from them by legal trickery.

The white renegade is played exceptionally well by John Carradine. His voice, his posture ooze evil most convincingly. He repeatedly inspires the native people to attack and he almost does our hero in once his men manage to capture Daniel. I won't tell how he is rescued because I don't want to ruin the surprise. I actually got well into the movie about half way through when the characters began to develop and we got a good depiction of what life might have been like back then.

I actually enjoyed this movie and I think you will too if you finish it. I fear a great many people who need special effects and computerized images will be bored with it. Hopefully those people will turn it off after a few minutes and not bother to comment.

If you appreciate the early cinemas I'm certain you will enjoy this one. It is one of the better early movies I have seen.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad for the genre
alanjj7 August 2001
This genre includes "The Ten Commandments" and "Brigham Young". It's the strong and righteous man leading his people into a promised land. We've got a brave and good-looking Daniel Boone, portrayed by a handsome actor named George O'Brien. (The injuns strip his shirt off and tie him to a stake for a while, so we even get to see some skin.)

The villain is John Caradine portraying Simon Girty, a white man who leads the indians in attacking the settlers. There's also a noble black man, apparently someone's slave, who names the town (Boonesburg) and heroically goes off into the woods to follow his 10-year-old charge.

The best scenes have Daniel confronting pompous authorities. The very place where Boone chooses to settle has already been claimed by another, and Virginia (which claimed the territory of "Cain-Tuck-Ee" at the time) backs up this prior claim. Boone gets one good punch in, then accepts the law as final. Boonesburg seeks other territory to establish a community.

The version of the video that I rented is put out by VCI Home Video, and the box is nothing like the one depicted herein. It's really not a kid's movie, as the Good Housekeeping box seems to depict.

Anyway, it's a pretty entertaining flick.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty good
planktonrules21 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This 1936 Daniel Boone movie starts badly—with a Plains Indian shooting a flaming arrow—even though Boone never encountered any of these Indians since he lived in the Appalachians—many, many, many miles away. In the 1700s when Boone lived, no contact had yet been made between Americans and these tribes. However, natives in the course of the film appeared to be the correct type and the film turned out to be pretty good.

The film stars George O'Brien as Boone. He was pretty famous during the late silent era with the leads in such films as "Sunrise". He also later made a name for himself in westerns. He was pretty good as the believably rugged title character. His job in the film is to lead a group of colonists to new land in the west (probably around what is Tennessee or Kentucky—just before the American Revolution. However, there are a couple different baddies who are out to stop them. The most obvious of these is a guy played by John Carradine—a white man who has rejected his people and stirs up the Indians to attack. It seemed quite appropriate that he wore a skunk-skin cap! The other, less obvious, is a prissy Englishman who is in love with a girl who Boone secretly adores. See the film to see how it all ends, though I will say the end was a bit of a surprise, as good didn't necessarily triumph over all evil in this tale.

This film is from RKO---and I am a bit surprised it was allowed to lapse into the public domain. It's rather entertaining and offers a look at the early settlement of the country. But, sadly, the sound is a bit uneven, though the print otherwise looks fine.

Usually I make a lot of comments about the historical inaccuracies of the film. However, the spirit of the film is reasonably close to real life—and Boone's mythic status makes it difficult to determine what he REALLY did do!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Version
Michael_Elliott28 February 2008
Daniel Boone (1936)

** (out of 4)

RKO film about Daniel Boone (George O'Brien) leading settlers from North Carolina to Kentucky while fighting a crazed white man (John Carradine) who's in good with deadly Indians. This adventure story is okay but it's certainly hampered by its low budget, which makes for a pretty dry story. When the action does kick in its way too late to save the film. O'Brien is good but Carradine steals the show even though he's chewing his way through each scene.

This movie is available through countless public domain labels.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Fine "Eastern Western" Starring George Montgomery
boblipton4 September 2017
George O'Brien swaps his usual cowboy gear for a coonskin cap to play Daniel Boone. It's an "eastern western", as he leads a wagon train over the Appalachian Mountains to found a settlement in Kentucky. In the course of the movie, he must court Heather Angel, deal with vengeful and effete Ralph Forbes, escape from Indians who want to burn him alive, under the command of renegade John Carradine, and an attack of the settlement.

It's a well done B under the direction of David Howard, with some lovely compositions by cinematographer Frank Good. In story terms, it hearkens back to LAST OF THE MOHICANS, with a faithful, if brutal Indian companion, played by George Regas. Modern viewers may be upset by scene-stealing Clarence Muse, playing a slave; he does so with enormous dignity. For fans of Mr. O'Brien, it will be a delight.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
George O'Brien and John Carradine
kevinolzak20 January 2014
1936's "Daniel Boone" benefits from the casting of George O'Brien in the title role, still a few years away from retirement. An accurate portrait of the rigors of life on the Kentucky frontier, complicated by omnipresent evildoer Simon Girty (John Carradine), leading a band of renegade Indians that indulge in murder and rape. Also conducting villainy from a safe distance is prissy British aristocrat Stephen Marlowe (Ralph Forbes), supported by the Virginia legislature in confiscating the land built up by Boone's people. Love interest is provided by Heather Angel, solid support from George Regas and Clarence Muse. Later appearing as a murderer on the 60s teleseries DANIEL BOONE ("The Witness"), Carradine, on loan from Fox, excels in one of his flashier villain roles; too bad the picture sags a bit when he's off screen too long (he appropriately wears a skunk-skin cap, as opposed to Boone's traditional coonskin).
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed