Queen of Hearts (1936) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Glamorous Gracie
malcolmgsw28 April 2007
This was an attempt by Ealing to glamorise Gracie.Obviously there must have been some idea to appeal to a part of the population that would not otherwise go to see one of her films,or maybe it was an attempt to gain entry to the American market.To be honest it doesn't really work.In this film she is directed by her husband to be Monty Banks,who also has a brief appearance in a sketch.Again she is lumbered,an appropriate word if ever,with John Loder as her leading man.After all what woman in her right mind would want him at the end of the film!The musical numbers are reasonably well staged but there are no memorable tunes amongst them.This is a reasonably entertaining film but it is not a patch on for example "Sing As We Go" which i consider one ,if not her best film.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Make that 7.5.
JohnHowardReid16 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with everything the previous reviewer has written, but I really enjoyed the movie despite its faults. After all, Gracie is Gracie, and Monty Banks is her hero. And it's nothing if not lavishly produced. Admittedly, the story is slight and the humor no more than mildly amusing. But the cast is nothing if not enthusiastic, and although it is in no way imaginative, Monty Banks' direction is efficient. And there are some cute little showgirls hovering around, although very much in the background, alas. They were obviously wished on Monty by the producer and he didn't want to make a fuss of them. However, there is a very amusing sequence in which Gracie is conned into doing an Apache dance.

The sets and costumes, particularly in the climactic production number, are appealing. The flurry and movement and some of the excitement backstage is expertly captured, and the business with the policeman provides a pleasant climax. Miss Fields is in fine voice too and sings a fair number of songs, but - and this is really the only thing wrong with the movie - said songs are an undistinguished and quite unmemorable lot!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gracie's the whole show.
mark.waltz28 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's a toss-up for me who the queen of British musical comedy was in the 1930's, Gracie Fields or the Australian born Cicely Courtneidge. Most funny ladies, they were more than just silly faces and pratfalls. They were ladies with heart. In this film, Fields is a working class girl who longs to be on the stage and ends up their accidentally because she is mistaken for a patroness of the arts and asked to headline the show in addition to give money that she does not have. It's hysterically funny to watch the stage door manager mock the real patroness, as well as some of the comic antics that Fields gets into.

Like Courtneidge in "Along Came Sally", Fields has a very funny Apache dance although it is completely different. Another segment has Fields being pulled into the rumble seat of a moving vehicle against her will. While she does get to sing a few songs, this is not officially a musical and the backstage segments do not break into a production number. However, it's one of the most amusing comedies I've seen coming out of England, consistently funny and the type of humor that American audiences will enjoy as well. Fields, who did go Hollywood in the 1940's, just exudes warmth, even when dolled up in fur. John Loder is her handsome leading man, but it is Fields' film all the way.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed