Back in Circulation (1937) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
An excellent Joan Blondell film!
mrsastor27 July 2006
This is in many ways typical of the comedy/drama/love story/mystery/social message low budget very entertaining movies that Warner Brothers so excelled at in the 1930's. Having been done before in some variation as The Front Page, Front Page Woman, and One Fatal Hour, 1937's Back In Circulation is equally entertaining. Most notably due to the delightful Joan Blondell, a very engaging and effective actor. Her wonderful performance in Back in Circulation makes this one of my favorite movies from this era.

Like all of the other incarnations of this basic premise, this screenplay has its own unique set of characters and circumstances. Joan Blondell plays "Timmy" Blake, the star reporter for The Morning Express, who is possessed of an utterly inexplicable crush on her boss, Bill Morgan (Pat O'Brien), your basic jerk, and we are told that she has in the past gone to great lengths to get the scoop, including stealing evidence and committing perjury. During the course of our story, however, her conscience begins to catch up to her when she finds herself convinced of the innocence of wealthy Arline Wade (Margaret Lindsay), a woman accused of murder that is all but convicted in the pages of The Morning Express. Naturally it is Timmy's cleverness and resourcefulness that gets the story in the Express in the first place, and it is she who must solve the mystery in order to extricate Ms. Wade from a miscarriage of justice. This is all done with appropriately placed poignancy and lighthearted comedic overtones. Timmy belting a sleazebag gigolo unconscious with her perfect right hook ("Beg pardon?") and her screaming "fit" in the street during the scene that leads us into the movie's conclusion are particularly hysterical.

Yes, the story is full of laughably implausible peculiarities (it is obvious movie producers of that era did not consider their audiences as savvy as those of today). On what planet would a struggling reporter living in a two-room apartment be able to afford a closet full of designer gowns and a maid?! These were real reporters, mind you, not the pampered addle-brained news spokes-models of today. It is likewise ridiculous to imagine that a reporter armed with nothing more than an anonymous note (another plot hole, we never are told where this note originated) could walk into a coroner's office and have a burial stopped and demand an autopsy be performed. It's a testament to how entertaining this film is that you don't really notice this sort of thing until after the movie is over and you've had time to think about it.

I am unsure how Pat O'Brien scored top billing in this vehicle, as it would be lost without brilliant and beautiful Joan Blondell, who appears in nearly every scene and certainly outranks O'Brien in both screen time and importance to the plot. The cast is filled out quite nicely with familiar faces from Warner Brothers stable of commendable talent, including John Litel, Ben Welden, and Granville Bates as the coroner. Also keep your eyes on the uncredited generic reporters that make up the press pool in the Plattstown sequences, one of them is DeWolfe (later William) Hopper, who in twenty years time would become Paul Drake on the TV series "Perry Mason".
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Warners film starring Joan Blondell and Pat O'Brien
blanche-230 March 2015
There were a few films in the '30s that set the stage for a lot of imitations. One was "It Happened One Night," which gave rise to dozens of films about heiresses, and the other was "The Front Page" from 1931, about a reporter and an editor. "Back in Circulation" is the latter, from 1937.

Here, the reporter is beautiful Joan Blondell, as sparkling and energetic as ever, and her editor is Pat O'Brien (who also appeared in "The Front Page"). Blondell is Timmy, a crafty reporter good at getting in on the most important stories, no matter what she has to do. O'Brien is Bill Morgan, who knows Timmy is the best and is constantly sending her out.

When a wealthy man dies, Bill receives a letter saying he was poisoned, so he dispatches Timmy to investigate. She's able to stop the funeral and convince the medical examiner to do an autopsy. Turns out he was poisoned, and suspicion falls on his wife (Margaret Lindsay). The paper goes after her in a big way, but after Timmy spends some time with her, she begins to suspect that the widow is innocent and hiding something. This puts her at odds with Bill.

Thanks to Blondell's performance, this movie manages to come off, though it isn't the tightest script. It flip-flops between comedy and heavy drama, and the alliance is uneasy.

John Litel and Regis Toomey are featured. Lindsay gives a '30s-style performance, and today it sticks out as being melodramatic. That was the style, and that's the way many roles were written. This was on its way out of style due to stars like Bette Davis.

Entertaining. Always a pleasure to see Blondell in a film.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Get the story
bkoganbing19 October 2018
A great deal from the classic newspaper story The Front Page goes into this film Back In Circulation. Before Rosalind Russell played Hildy Johnson in His Girl Friday there was Joan Blondell in this film blazing an underappreciated trail for Russell with her portrayal of a tabloid reporter covering a murder trial.

Blondell who is second billed to Pat O'Brien playing her editor is the heart of this film. She gets an assignment to cover a case involving the death by poison of a wealthy man who married a young wife. Margaret Lindsay is the widow and at first Blondell rips her apart in the press and the stories and pressure from her paper are responsible for her arrest.

But as the trial goes on Blondell gets a change of heart and starts questioning Lindsay's guilt. She is very silent and obviously at least to the movie audience covering something up.

Curiously enough Pat O'Brien who was Hildy Johnson in the first film adaption of The Front Page played editor Walter Burns on stage. In this film I think we are seeing a bit of what O'Brien was like on stage in The Front Page.

Still it's Joan Blondell who drives this film and it is a must for her fans.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joan Blondell shines as a woman working in a man's world who takes no prisoners and comes out smelling like a rose.
mark.waltz30 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Women reporters in classic films were usually relegated to being "sob sisters", society columnists or running an advice column. In the case of Joan Blondell here, she's right in the thickness of everything, and it doesn't hurt to be the girlfriend of the tough editor (Pat O'Brien) in getting a good story. As the film starts, she is griping of being assigned to cover a railroad crash (dramatically portrayed in the opening segment) and manages to get enough of the scoop (and a picture) especially when she tricks the reporter from another paper to sharing what he has gotten. She's funny and clever, tough, yet typical woman, as she strives to get O'Brien to take the night off for some dancing and drinking. When he stands her up, she's furious, but the brief glimpse of a glamorous socialite (Margaret Lindsay) gets her attention. O'Brien gets the scoop on the death of a wealthy man who may have been poisoned, and he manipulates Blondell into taking on the story. It turns out that Lindsay is the man's widow which brings out Blondell's tough side as she strives to get the story, even if the paper is threatened with a libel suit when Blondell insinuates that Lindsay is the top suspect in the man's murder. But as she finds out, there is more to the story, and it takes not only her integrity but her intelligence to outwit O'Brien as he insists she go for one angle in getting the story while she insists on a completely different angle.

By far, this is Blondell's film all the way, a man's picture with a woman in the lead. It is everything that great journalism films are all about, going back to "The Front Page" and continuing with "Five Star Final" and dozens of other films that dealt with reporters, usually covering stories that are more scandal than substance. Blondell develops her character here beautifully, and you get to see her ambition, her ruthlessness, her tenderness, and her being willing to change her mind when all the facts come together. This might have just seemed like another contract assignment to her at the time (the type of film that gets overlooked at award time), but Blondell's performance is among her best, and one that could have easily gotten her a Best Actress nomination had the studio promoted her a bit more. The mixture of comedy and pathos here (especially in a scene where Blondell tells Lindsay off for not cooperating in her own defense) is brilliantly executed. and a scene where O'Brien outwits Blondell that leaves her screaming on the street is hysterically funny as well as poignant.

O'Brien is his usual cracker jack fast talking heel here, likable even if he's rather crass, but he does not get to do as much as Blondell and is thus secondary to the plot. Lindsay gives hints into the coolness of her society character with enough references to the past to make her more than just a drawing by numbers cardboard cutout. John Litel gives a very good performance as the mysterious doctor connected with Lindsay, while Walter Byron is deliciously sleazy as a gigolo type whom Blondell utilizes to get information on her story. She gets in a good couple of slugs on him when he gets onto her, a rare chance in movies to see a woman hit a man and not end up with a black eye, or worse, dead. Seeing Blondell be as tough as any man is really satisfying, especially when it comes to getting it on O'Brien. The ending gives a hint that a follow-up might have been planned, but that was not to be. However, for a one entry newspaper comedy/drama, this one deserves to be researched a lot more, especially for the rare way it allows its female leading character to be just as commanding as any male character in the very macho surroundings of Warner Brothers.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than your average WB 30s programmer...
AlsExGal1 July 2023
... even when you figure in that given the decade, the studio, and the stars - Pat O'Brien and Joan Blondell - that you know exactly what kind of film that this is going to be - that being a film with lots of snappy dialogue, akin to the precodes of five years before, but with the rough edges removed to pass the censors.

Timmy Blake (Joan Blondell) is a reporter for the New York Express, a paper run by Bill Morgan (Pat O'Brien), who also is Timmy's boyfriend, and the audience does need to be told that a few times, as these two show zero affection for each other, but do show lots of anger, more like a divorced couple still working together. They are both completely amoral in regards to their profession, in pursuit of a story, regardless of who it hurts.

One night Morgan gets an anonymous note saying that prominent automobile manufacturer Vernon Wade did not die of a heart attack, but instead was murdered by poison. His funeral is planned the next day and he is scheduled to be cremated immediately afterward. Head scratching moment number one - Morgan and Blake go to the town where the funeral is being held and, on the strength of nothing but their fast talking, get the coroner to agree to call off the funeral and perform an autopsy on Wade. The autopsy does turn up that Wade was indeed poisoned using a poison that the Wades did have around the house.

Next is the search for the murderer which, oddly enough, is being headed up by Blake and Morgan rather than the police. The widow is being strangely enigmatic about all of this, and slowly clues arise that point to the widow (Margaret Lindsay) as the murderer. She is arrested and tried for the murder, but this is where things get weird. Suddenly Timmy Blake, ace reporter, grows a heart and a conscience and becomes convinced that the widow is innocent when the clues she dug up were what indicted her in the first place. But for some reason the widow, although she says she is innocent, refuses to assist in her own defense. Complications ensue.

This one was better than I expected precisely because it takes such an odd turn during its last one third, and the mystery is compelling. This was made during the two year period that James Cagney was absent Warner Brothers while they were locked in a contract dispute. And although O'Brien was very good in his role, his seemed like the kind of part that would have gone to Cagney had he been available at the time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Newspaperwoman Blondell will make you laugh, cry and want to be her friend.
abeachedwhale17 November 2021
This film is packed full of unique characters, complex arch's, and is a treasure for anyone who likes 1930s comedies. Lead actress Joan Blondell displays a flair for comedic touch while also providing excellent dramatic expressions and reactions. Her character is tomboyish, yet, very attractive and feminine. One characteristic I thought made her most interesting is she didn't care about how her hair looked. At that time in history most female movie stars had their hair strictly cared for by a makeup department or they themselves would maintain it like most people do. This made every scene look unauthentic to real life. But I was surprised to see it wasn't perfectly in place all the the time, but often falling in her face in an unflattering way. Hard to tell if that was on purpose or due to quick shooting. Whatever the case, it is unique and memorable. The world that we see on screen seems to have enormous depth. I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys a balance of comedy and drama, while also being open to "black and white". This movie single handedly turned me into a Joan Blondell fan.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
bad couple
SnoopyStyle17 October 2021
Ace reporter 'Timmy' Blake (Joan Blondell) uses her feminine wiles and any bold-faced lie to get the story before rivals like Snoopy Davis. She is set to marry her editor Bill Morgan (Pat O'Brien) despite having constant arguments with him. Her next assignment is reporting on the death of the rich motor baron Spencer Wade. She comes into town declaring that he was poisoned. Eugene Forde was his doctor. Timmy's reporting starts laying suspicions upon the widow Arline Wade.

I'm not sure that they actually love each other. Do they even like each other? There is a difference between angry banter and loving banter. Pat O'Brien is not doing loving and Joan oscillates. The movie does these big broad screwball comedy bits and some don't come off right. The shattered glass doors always come after their fights and that accentuates something that needs less accents. I don't like this pairing but I do like Timmy being a scheming reporter. Joan Blondell could pull off sassy and scheming with enough appeal. Her oscillations help her in this case. This movie would work much better if only she isn't in a relationship.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good...though the latter portion of the film makes little sense.
planktonrules25 April 2018
"Back in Circulation" is very much a film like "The Front Page" or "His Girl Friday". So, if you liked them, you're bound to enjoy this Joan Blondell picture.

The oddly named 'Timmy' Blake (Blondell) is a journalist with a bent towards the sensational and sleazy. Through much of the movie, her mantra seems to be 'anything for a story' and her sleaze-loving boss (Pat O'Brien) encourages as much muck-raking as possible...all in an effort to boost circulation. However, after spending much of the story pushing for an investigation into the death of a rich guy by poisoning, she suddenly has a crisis of conscience....though I was at a loss to figure out why considering her actions through the first 2/3 of the movie! Still enjoyable...just not completely consistent.

By the way, if you do watch the film, take a look at Timmy's two right crosses. That woman packs a terrific punch!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More a culture of Hollywood than of society of the time
SimonJack17 December 2019
Hollywood had a fixation on the press in the 1930s. It had other fixations too, when it came to making certain types of movies. Jimmy Cagney became a star and built a career on gangster films, although he was talented as a dancer as well. But "Back in Circulation" is one of the big productions of the studios that focused on the press.

It's true that there were press scandals, just as there was a gangland culture that included some corrupt elements of law and order. The latter were associated to a great extent with prohibition and organized crime. The former fed the latter. In the press scandals, sensationalism and competition drove much of the journalism before World War II.

While Pat O'Brien has first billing in the film, "Back in Circulation" is mostly a Joan Bennett film. As Bill Morgan's (O'Brien) star reporter on the Daily Express, Timmy Blake (Blondell) is a one-woman production with multiple skills. Besides her reporter's nose for news and her female intuition, she can investigate, play attorney, ply coroners and otherwise stage crime and accident scenes.

The best thing of this film is Blondell's character. The bantering, arguing and exchanges between Timmy and Bill are almost standard scripts of films of this genre in the 1930s. "Front Page," "His Girl Friday," and the myriad others of the genre all had the city editor/news room quandaries with the reporters. So, O'Brien's role isn't anything special. But the script for this film has a huge hole that hurts it and Blondell's performance in the end. Except for the very opening at a train wreck, there isn't another scene involving the police anywhere to be found.

So, what this turns out to be is a film in which the press - reporters and photographers and editors, follow leads, conduct investigations, solve crimes and bring the criminals or culprits to trial. None of the great comedy-crime films of the Golden Age presumed such a high regard for the press and low regard for the justice system. The police were always seen as being on the job, even if they were a move or two behind the movie's hero. But the plot of this film proceeds as though the press were the purveyors of law and order, and there were no police to be found anywhere. That considerable absence or oversight from this film stretches its credibility and strains the ability of the audience to appreciate the film.

It's worth watching just for Joan Blondell's performance, and the bit of intrigue toward the end. Otherwise, "Back in Circulation" joins the ranks of the mostly forgettable "press" movies of the period.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Joan Blondell Raises Circulation
wes-connors3 April 2015
Although reporters are barred from the scene, a deadly train wreck doesn't stop enterprising Joan Blondell (as Timothea "Timmy" Blake) from covering the story. Pretending to be a doctor, Ms. Blondell gets the scoop. Her editor and love interest Pat O'Brien (as William "Bill" Morgan) gets an anonymous tip stating that an automobile manufacturer did not die of heart failure, but was poisoned. He assigns Blondell the story and she suspects beautiful widow Margaret Lindsay (as Arline Vivian). We wonder why Blondell is interested in Mr. O'Brien and, even more, why he seems so uninterested in Blondell. The plot unravels between two dubious letters. The main reason to watch is Blondell. She is strong and sexy in this film. And, although second-billed, Blondell is the star.

**** Back in Circulation (9/25/37) Ray Enright ~ Joan Blondell, Pat O'Brien, Margaret Lindsay, John Litel
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Warner Bros. Sizzle
dogwater-15 April 2015
If you are a fan of 1930's Warners, you can't miss this one. Joan Blondell is Timothea "Timmy" Blake, ace reporter for editor Pat O'Brian's headline screaming tabloid. The plot races around a "show girl with a past", the improbably cast, sweet-faced Margaret Lindsey accused of poisoning her no-good older husband whom nobody misses. Timmy doesn't buy it, but she helped build the case for indictment. Lindsey is in love with the good doctor John Litel for some reason even though he seems a bit thick. Go figure. It's all wrapped in a furious flurry of patented Warner's can't -wait -to -get -home speed with what must be 14 lbs. of dialogue crammed into an hour- fifteen or so. It's Blondell's movie and she is feisty, sexy, always surprising and has a mean right hook. Pat O'Brian was some kind of master at machine gunning lines out of an immobile face. For a big man who moves slowly, he can sure cut with the greased patter. The WB character roster, always a reason to watch these films, is well-represented by Regis Toomey, Eddie Acuff, and the always amusing Granville Bates. You won't have a chance to breathe.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The scenes between Blondell and Lindsay are the best
larrywest42-610-61895714 August 2023
The negatives: much of the movie is predictable, and, for me, the Pat O'Brien character - hard-boiled newspaper editor - is just _too_ cliched. His character has no depth, and there's nothing to indicate why Blondell's character would fall for him.

The positives: it's really a Blondell movie, and the scenes between her and Margaret Lindsay are my favorite: not quite as predictable, and both actors convinced me their characters had feelings (Lindsay's more restrained, fittingly).

Blondell carries the movie, but I also found Litel's acting made his character interesting, and I enjoyed seeing Ben Weldon playing a likeable character for once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Did they learn nothing from Five Star Final?
1930s_Time_Machine30 April 2023
This is a quite unpleasant picture which paints the newspaper industry in a particularly bad light. Joan Blondell plays a character different to the usual bubbly screen persona we're used to. Along with Pat O'Brien, she's a gutter journalist working at a muck-raking scandal rag ruining people's lives without any cares.

If you've seen Mervyn LeRoy's excellent FIVE STAR FINAL made in 1931 this will make you a little depressed. That film was a scathing attack on the disgusting and disreputable practices of the gutter press but six years later it looks like its message was ignored. It's not just the fact that nothing seems to have changed, this picture presents its protagonists as nice, fun-loving regular guys and even tries to inject some elements of comedy. There's no condemnation of these unpleasant people, they don't change, they're the same scumbags at the end as they are at the beginning. The unfunny comedy relief doesn't help - it actually feels quite out of place and a little disrespectful.

After destroying someone's life, Joan Blondell's character does try to make amends but not because she thinks it's the right thing to do, she does this just to make herself feel better about herself. She and Pat O'Brien do put in what feel like authentic performances which does let you engage with them - although you don't really want to.

It's a reasonably well made picture but there's an undercurrent of sourness to this.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joan Blondell is Strongly "Back in Circulation"
glennstenb21 February 2022
"Back in Circulation" is an energetic, fast-moving, and enjoyable movie experience centering on newspaper reporters, one of the more frequent story concerns of the 1930's. Pat O'Brien is top billed, but his high-volume barking and ordering grows tiresome...one begins to wonder why he would be of romantic interest for any woman who spends a lot of time with him, as he is work-obsessed, inconsiderate, bellicose, totally judgmental, and physically manipulative. His role is almost thankless and his character is on hand mostly to pave the way for Joan Blondell's character's existence.

On the other hand, Blondell and her character propel the film into its worthy status; Blondell is charming, pretty, alluring, sparkling, tenacious, and totally fun in her performance. This must have been a particularly satisfying role for an actress in the 1930's and she does it proud with her expressive eyes, confident walks-through, and smartly-delivered dialog, By the way, in the closing players list O'Brien is top billed but Blondell, listed on the second line, has a slightly bigger point and font (one wonders how this got worked out?).

With plenty of 1930's decor and locales to savor and many familiar actors, including Margaret Lindsay and Regis Toomey, to support the superlative Joan Blondell, "Back In Circulation" is very much worth the viewing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Loud performances, annoyingly bad plot
csteidler8 February 2020
Ace reporter Joan Blondell drives through the night and breaks some rules to get the story on the big train wreck. Back at the paper, she expects kudos--but boss Pat O'Brien does nothing but complain. Blondell is insulted, O'Brien insists that he appreciates her work, and they get all lovey-dovey for about two seconds...and then O'Brien tells her that she looks tired and she stomps out of his office, slamming the door and breaking the glass.

Both stars are energetic and talk fast but the characterizations are not subtle in this noisy newspaper drama. O'Brien is exceedingly bossy and unpleasant as the demanding editor; Blondell is just not believable as the hardboiled reporter who for some reason has a soft spot for her crabby boss.

The plot involves a murder investigation by Blondell and the paper. Having received an anonymous tip, Blondell stops a funeral and convinces the coroner to do an autopsy. Sure enough, the guy was poisoned. Could the murderer have been Margaret Lindsay, the beautiful widow? John Litel, the doctor who attributed the death to a heart attack? The paper pushes hard for Lindsay's indictment for the murder but just when it's almost too late, Blondell starts feeling guilty and wonders if Lindsay is innocent after all....

An interesting cast includes Regis Toomey, Eddie Acuff, and George E. Stone as various newspaper employees. Ben Welden plays a casino owner who, in one of the picture's many ridiculous sequences, visits O'Brien's office to help identify a suspect and then is held at gunpoint by O'Brien to prevent him leaving and talking to other papers' reporters.

A fast paced newspaper drama with these stars sounds like great fun. Unfortunately, the obnoxious characters and poor plot pretty much sink it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Exclusive Story
lugonian2 July 2023
BACK IN CIRCULATION (Warner Brothers, 1937), directed by Ray Enright, is a newspaper story with grand mix of comedy and murder mystery performed with sharp dialogue and fast-pace performances by Pat O'Brien and Joan Blondell. For their second of four films together, the story in question belongs specifically to Blondell, its central character. Sporting darker hair than her usual blonde appearance, Blondell is still sassy and amusingly believable, even when defending herself with one solid punch. Aside from her frequent catch phrase of "hot digity," she goes through her love/hate emotions with her editor, typically played by O'Brien, who handles her assignments he knows she can handle.

The story opens with Bill Morgan (Pat O'Brien) editor of the Morning Express, assigning Timothea Wade, better known as Timmy (Joan Blondell), along with emergency crew of photographer, Murphy (Eddie Acuff) and Buck (Regis Toomey) to get an exclusive scoop on a railroad wreck during the after midnight hours. If her assignments aren't tough enough, Timmy's love for Morgan is tougher, who thinks more of the newspaper game than romance. Timmy's next assignment comes as a challenge when she must prove socialite Arlene Vivian Wade (Margaret Lindsay) has poisoned her motor baron husband, Spencer. After proving her theory correct through an autopsy, against orders by family physician, Eugene Forde (John Litel), having ruled heart attack on the death certificate. Forde suggests Arlene sue the newspaper for libel, which leads the arrest of Arlene to stand trial for murder. Timmy covers the trial, only to have second thoughts. Others in the cast include Craig Reynolds ("Snoop" Davis); George E. Stone ("Mac"); Walter Byron (Carlton Whitney); Ben Weldon and Granville Bates.

Not as classic as some other newspaper themes as LIBELED LADY (MGM, 1936) or the latter HIS GIRL FRIDAY (Columbia, 1940), BACK IN CIRCULATION is quite an underrated item. Many great scenes include Blondell talking her way in and out of any situation with confidence, along with running gag of her angrily walking out of the editor's office, slamming the door hard enough to break window glass behind her. Yet Blondell's serious temperments are just as believable as her comical antics. By the 82 minute mark, BACK IN CIRCULATION leaves one not only entertained and satisfied, but to wonder why this isn't as better known as it deserves to be. Interestingly, O'Brien and Blondell teamed up again for another "read all about it" item titled OFF THE RECORD (1939), which could easily get confused with BACK IN CIRCULATION, even though stories and characters for both are completely different with similar styles.

Never distributed to home video, BACK IN CIRCULATION has become available on DVD with occasional showings on Turner Classic Movies cable channel. As much as Blondell herself once said in her profile on public television's 1971 edition of "The Movie Crazy Years" as to how much her movies at Warners were so much alike, BACK IN CIRCULATION stands out on its own bylines and press deadlines. "Hot digity." (***)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Split personality
cygnus5830 April 2001
This is a prime example of a movie that doesn't know what it wants to be. The first half of the film is a snappy little screwball comedy, obviously inspired by "The Front Page" (just like about a zillion other newspaper comedies), in which star reporter Joan Blondell tries to cope with hard-driving editor Pat O'Brien. It isn't brilliant, but it's good enough to get by. The second half is a typical Warners social crusading film of the thirties, an expose of the dangers of yellow journalism. This half doesn't work very well at all, partly because Margaret Lindsay's performance is wooden, and partly because the change in tone is so abrupt that you're liable to suffer from whiplash. O'Brien and Blondell are both cast to their strengths, and they work well together. This film was never going to be a masterpiece, but it might have been modestly successful if it had maintained the tone of its first half. As it is, the movie just doesn't work. Warners couldn't help themselves; they never passed up an opportunity to hoist the gauntlet of a social crusade. Sometimes they did it well, but in this case they should have let well enough alone.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Some Fine Actors Give Poor Performances
boblipton29 June 2023
Joan Blondell is a tough newspaper reporter for editor Pat O'Brien. She determines that a rich man has been poisoned, and writes a series of stories that gets his widow, Margaret Lindsay put on trial for murder. Then, watching the trial, she decides Miss Lindsay didn't do it.

I've been looking at late 1930s Warner Brothers features recently, renewing my acquaintance, and in general, I don't find them as good as I used to. Perhaps my standards have become more persnickety. However, let's start with why this one now seems not much of a good movie. First, it hangs around for almost 37 of its 80 minutes before it finds the story it wants to tell. Second, Miss Blondell's line readings become monotonous after she decides that Miss Lindsay is innocent.

There are some oddities, like O'Brien being top-billed, but that's a matter for the front office. Ray Enright was one of Warners' workhouse directors, able to turn out a fine movie; his direction of the usually delightful Miss Blondell is astonishingly bad; but then, John Litel is in this movie, and he gives a poor performance too. What was going on? With George E. Stone, Walter Byron, and Regis Toomey.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed