The Return of Doctor X (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
63 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Bogart as the first punk rocker
krorie4 October 2005
Bogart has been given a bad press for his role in "The Return of Doctor X." Why he even gave himself a bad press, saying the role was forced on him by the studio, a role intended for Boris Karloff. But actually Bogart's performance is one of the best ingredients in this campy flick. Bogart's two really terrible acting attempts were the same year in "The Oklahoma Kid," where he tried to play dastardly villain, Whip McCord, and "Dark Victory," where Bogart is completely miscast as an Irish horse trainer.

Nineteen thirty nine must have been Bogart's quirky year. He finally found himself in the early 1940's and with "The Maltese Falcon" became a screen icon. In "The Return of Doctor X," with his chalky makeup and streaked hair, Bogart resembles a punk rocker before his time.

The film is not bad entertainment. The weakest part is the attempt by Wayne Morris to be funny. He thinks falling into a room by leaning against a supposedly locked door which suddenly opens is hilarious. So much so that he does it twice. The funniest character is Huntz Hall early in his career. There is one funny line from Morris. After digging up Quesne's body and in a hurry to leave, morris tells the caretaker to "put it back," then rushes off.

The acting is top notch with the best performance coming from John Litel, closely matched by Bogart's left-field mad dead doctor. All in all a curious and worthwhile film, especially for Bogart fans.
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bogie's only horror film is a hoot.
Art-2228 March 2000
You've got to see it to believe it. Bogie in makeup looking ghostly white with a white streak in his hair, in a combination Frankenstein and vampire horror film. It actually happened, due to knuckleheads at Warner Bros. who put him in this film against his wishes. I was amused as well as amazed throughout, and enjoyed watching Bogie stroke his pet rabbit and playing it all straight. Others in the cast (Wayne Morris, Rosemary Lane and Dennis Morgan) were fine, but Bogie is the only reason to see this movie. Be prepared to shake your head in disbelief.

The movie must have gone through some heavy editing, because there were many credit errors. First, the end credits bill Wayne Morris as Walter Barnett, but he is called Walter Garrett in the movie throughout and that name is also printed in newspapers several times. Next, Charles Wilson is billed as Detective Ray Kincaid, but he is called Roy throughout. Finally, many of the actors who were supposed to be in the movie never turn up, including two who were credited onscreen - Howard Hickman and Arthur Aylesworth.
43 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Viewed Out of Bogart's Contextual Career…Pretty Good Horror
LeonLouisRicci22 July 2015
Fans of Bogey like to Scoff at this "Miscasting" and Bogart would Demean and Destroy this Movie at the Drop of a Hat, but...Bogart shows Range and Style and is as Creepy as They Come.

Playing a Resurrected Mad Scientist with a Blood Craving Disease He manages to Steal the Movie. Not that Hard considering it is not really a Return or Sequel, the Dated Comedy elements Threaten to Sink the Thing from the start, and this Short LIttle B-Picture was not really Warner Brothers Forte.

It's a genuine Horror Film nonetheless with enough Lurid and Scary elements to Sustain the Shortcomings. Although Bogart makes it His Film, some others also Impress. John Litel as the Serious Scientist trying to Find a Cure for Diseased Blood and Lya Lys as an Actress falling Victim to the Madness shines in few Brief Scenes.

Can be Appreciated Out of Context for Humphrey Bogart's Iconic Career and the Comedy inclusions Ignored, This is a Pretty Good Entry in Thirties Horror.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quirky little gem
nova-6327 March 2011
I love this film and that's the reason I'm adding a review to a film that already has 30 reviews. First of all, many previous reviewers complain that this is not a typical horror movie from the period. For example there is no Karloff or Lugosi in a starring role. That is true, but the film plays more like a breezy, fast paced Warner Bros. B' crime film. I have no problem with that. Although the horror isn't stressed, the finale with Bogart taking the girl to the abandoned farm house is pretty spooky.

I argue with those saying the cast isn't very good. While Bogart isn't at home playing a corpse who has returned to life, he doesn't disappoint. John Litel, is over the top (and great) as the doctor who returns Bogart from the dead. Finally Wayne Morris, who is the real star of the film, plays the wise guy reporter investigating the strange happenings. The rest of the cast is well above average for a "chunk it out as fast as possible" B' picture. This includes, Dennis Morgan, Rosemary Lane, Huntz Hall, and the spooky Lya Lys.

This is no masterpiece, but this is fast and fun and never boring for a second. Ah, if only there were only more films like this. Who doesn't love a Bogart zombie film? Must viewing for any film buff.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bogart's Strangest Role (But Not His Worst)
utgard1410 February 2014
Reporter Wayne Morris and doctor Dennis Morgan team up to investigate some murders and a possible connection to people with a rare blood type. This leads them to suspect doctor John Litel and his creepy assistant Humphrey Bogart. In-name-only sequel to Doctor X that is best known today as Humphrey Bogart's only horror or science fiction film. As such, it's usually mocked or joked about. It really doesn't deserve to be. It's not a great film but a perfectly entertaining hour-long horror flick. Bogart's performance is fine. His nervous twitches and weird makeup give him a creepy presence that is the film's most memorable asset. For those looking to see him act much worse, I suggest seeking out more mainstream-acceptable fare as Dark Victory.

Interestingly, Bogie doesn't even get top billing. Neither does Dennis Morgan. Both are billed below Wayne Morris and Rosemary Lane. This seems odd today when Bogart and Morgan are more well known to classic film fans than either Morris or Lane. But in 1939 neither was a big star yet. Morgan was an up-and-comer and Bogie had been toiling away at WB for years as the villain in gangster pictures. Still, it seems strange WB at that time thought Wayne Morris had more potential than Bogie or Morgan. Morris is actually the weakest link in the film. He was an actor with a big frame and a boy-next-door likability but was ill-suited for a streetwise investigative reporter. The fact that he wore a silly hat with the brim turned up in front and was pretty much comic relief for the first half hour of the movie doesn't help the audience take him seriously. The supporting cast is nice. Rosemary Lane receives second billing and is the female lead but really has nothing to do but be the victim. I haven't added up everybody's screen time but it seems to me she was in the picture very little. Huntz Hall of Bowery Boys fame appears as a copy boy who needles Morris. Lya Lys has a meatier part than Lane as a woman brought back to life in the same manner Bogart was. She even allows herself to be made up to look waxy and dead, which was a big deal back in the day for any actress who wanted to be thought of as a romantic leading lady. John Litel turns in a typically stable performance as the doctor behind bringing Bogie back. He actually seems to be the movie's villain for most of the running time before Bogie's Dr. X takes over.

Overall, an enjoyable B horror film that should please fans of the genre. It's unfairly slammed a lot, even more than the usual B movie from the period. My guess is that's because a lot of Bogart fans who don't normally like this type of movie checked it out for him and didn't like it. The movie definitely garners more attention because of his part than it would otherwise. At its heart it's just another in a string of mad scientist movies made from the '30s through the '50s, albeit an enjoyable one. If you're a Bogart completist, I'm sure you'll want to check it out for curiosity's sake. Hopefully you'll like it. Fans of old sci-fi and horror films will definitely enjoy it.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Average "B" thriller stands out do the presence of mis-cast Bogart.
youroldpaljim12 August 2001
Had this film not cast Humphrey Bogart as the title mad scientist, this film would probably regarded as just another 1930's big studio "B" thriller. Bogart tries hard , but he is Bogart, and its just to hard to take seeing him playing an executed mad scientist brought back from the dead who is now a scientific vampire. Supposedly, Boris Karloff was slated to play the title role, but was not available.

I have to admit I was very impressed with the films art direction (credited to Esdras Hartley.) The laboratory of Dr. Flegg consists of a maze of glass tubes dripping a dark fluid in beakers, and has the look of a giant circulatory system, reflecting the films emphasis on blood.

Hollywood legend has it that Bogart was having trouble with WB brass at the time with the type roles they were giving him. The WB brass wanted to punish him by casting him in this and KING OF THE UNDERWORLD in order show Bogie who was boss.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Blood Doctor...
Xstal21 March 2023
If you're container is filled up with blood type 1, there's a chance that you may be emptied and then gone, as it's required by a cadaver, to remain as life's gate crasher, although he's generally quite guarded and withdrawn (and quite pale and anaemic to boot and not particularly pleasant).

It's not the greatest rip off (in part) of a Mary Shelley classic you might be familiar with, and it's probably Bogart's worst film, certainly of the ones I've seen, although he does an admirable impression of Boris Karloff lite, which I'm sure he must have relished - I fancy Cagney had a good giggle too. The rest of the performances are as stereotyped for the time as any although, coming in at a smidgen over 1 hour, it won't leave you feeling or looking as jaded as the titular Doctor.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Mysterious Bogie Man
lugonian10 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X (Warner Brothers, 1939) directed by Vincent Sherman, is in retrospect, not a sequel to the 1932 early two-strip Technicolor mystery, DOCTOR X (First National) that featured Lionel Atwill and Fay Wray, but actually a Grade Z programmer surprisingly headed by a very interesting cast of non-horror actors. Regardless of what's displayed on screen, in capable hands this might have worked as one of the finer "B" films of the horror or science fiction genre. Production values, though, are on a larger scale than any poverty row horror film from Monogram Studios, and slightly beneath what Universal would start producing by the mid 1940s. THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X, however, as the title indicates, is a story about a scientist. The scientist in question is not Doctor X, but on a Doctor Francis Flegg (John Litel) whose profession is on blood experiments.

Plot: Walter Barnett (Wayne Morris), a hapless reporter from Wichita, Kansas, working for the Morning Dispatch in New York City, arranges for an interview with European actress, Angela Merrova (Lya Lys), currently staying at the Park Vista Hotel. Later that day, Barnett (whose spoken surname sounds more like Garrett) comes to her hotel room to find her dead, stabbed through the heart. After telephoning the news to the city editor about his discovery, the news about Merrova's death makes the front page. However, rather than getting a promotion, Barnett is called to his editor's office to find not only Angela Merrova to be sitting there very much alive (in spite of her dead white appearance), but to be suing the Morning Dispatch of $100,000 for damages on her reputation. Fired from his job, Barnett comes to Jules Memorial Hospital where he tells his intern friend, Michael Rhodes (Dennis Morgan), of the circumstances, which Rhodes finds hard to believe. Stanley Rodgers (John Ridgely), a blood donor specialist scheduled to arrive at the hospital for a transfusion prior to an operation performed by Doctor Francis Flegg (John Litel), is found dead. Barnett notices Rodgers has died in the same fashion as Angela Merrova. Through a series of investigations, it is learned that any patient with Type One blood (the same blood type of Rodgers) has disappeared from the hospital, leaving the victims drained of their blood. As Rhodes goes to Doctor Flegg for a visit, he's followed inconspicuously by Barnett. Before meeting with Flegg, Rhodes is met by Flegg's laboratory assistant (Humphrey Bogart), whose ghost-like facial features and acquiring his icy cold and shake indicates that there's something entirely strange and mysterious about him. As for Barnett (peeking through the windows), believing he's seen this man before, goes through the file room of the Morning Dispatch looking for clues. He discovers through old newspaper clippings that Flegg's assistant bears some connection to the recently executed Doctor X.

Featured in the supporting cast are: Rosemary Lane (Joan Vance, the student nurse); Huntz Hall (Pinky, the newspaper copy boy); Charles C. Wilson (Detective Roy Kincaid); and Vera Lewis (Nurse Sweetman). Olin Howland playing the morgue attendant is very amusing with his "dead-on" sense of humor.

Zombie-like creatures, including Bogart (billed as Marshall Quesne, but who refers himself to the name that sounds more like "Kane," sporting glasses and a streak of white hair down his head) and Lya Lys, in desperate need for specific rare blood types in order to stay alive and roaming the city, makes THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X quite interesting in plot though sometimes unbearable with its over abundance of "comedy relief" by Wayne Morris. What makes this "thriller" watchable is the unusual casting of the soon to be "superstar" Humphrey Bogart, then a resident Warner Brothers stock player notable for playing gangster-types. While Boris Karloff, who specialized in roles as this, was appearing in programmers at Warners (1938-40), makes one wonder why he wasn't awarded the role given to Bogey instead. Maybe because that's to be expected. With Bogart, it's not, which is why it makes fantastic viewing during of 62 minutes. Another point of interest is finding Bogart's name billed third during the opening credits, and star credit for its closing cast listing. With its sci-fi influence, THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X is campy, often amusing, and seldom scary. It does offer Rosemary Lane a rare opportunity enacting the frightful heroine quite commonly found in horror films, as well as an opportunity to belt out a scream or two while tied onto a laboratory table as she's to become the next victim of losing her blood. In traditional Bogart form, the story does find time for some gun play and car chases down the city streets. As for Dennis Morgan, who began his movie career for MGM under the name of Stanley Morner, makes a fine serious-minded secondary character in his Warner Brothers debut. He would soon rise to leading roles within a few years, becoming best known for his frequent partnership opposite Jack Carson in a series of Technicolor musical-comedies throughout the 1940s.

THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X, thus far, has never been distributed on video cassette. It currently plays on Turner Classic Movies, especially in October in collaboration of Halloween and other horror flicks. (**1/2 blood transfusions)
30 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Silly B-picture, but mandatory viewing for one reason
abadger19 October 1998
Fast, spry and completely forgettable except for one thing -- Humphrey Bogart, only months away from super-stardom, was assigned against his will to play the villain. His first appearance -- made up to look like a dime-store mannequin, cradling a rabbit in his arms -- is perhaps the most priceless entry in the huge gallery of star-embarrassments.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's OK, But Not Much Of A 'Horror'' Film
ccthemovieman-127 October 2006
As others have pointed out, this really isn't a sequel to the 1932 film "Doctor X." Too bad....it might have been better had it been. Not that this is bad; it isn't, but isn't anything to write home about, either. Thanfully, it's only 62 minutes. Had this been 20 minutes longer, it would have been a yawner.

First, for a "horror" picture, this isn't much horror. Actually there is no horror, nothing in here that is going to frighten the most timid of souls. The only strange- looking person is Humphrey Bogart and all classic film buffs will do is laugh when they see "Bogie" in here. With a plastic-looking face and some weird hair coloring, you want to laugh out loud when you first see him.

Wayne Morris and Dennis Morgan are the real stars of the film. They are in almost every scene, with Morris as reporter "Walter 'Wichita' Garrett" and Morgan as "Dr. Mike Rhodes." John Litel plays a Dr. Frankenstein-type character in "Dr. Flegg," a key member of this cast.

This movie is almost all talk until the 59-minute mark when "Dr. X" makes a run for it and gets involved in gunfire. Yet, it's never boring, either. The scenes move quickly from place to place and plays more like a crime film than anything else. Typical of early '30s crime movies, we get some corny humor from one of the characters, in this case from Morris.

Kudos to the Hollywood Legends Of Horror series to make this DVD transfer so nice looking. It's part of an attractive package of 1930s horror films.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bogart's Contribution to the First Horror Film Cycle
theowinthrop12 October 2005
This film is important because it shows that even Hollywood legends need huge amounts of luck to avoid film oblivion. Bogie had been in Hollywood for four years in the early 1930s, and never hit a good film (although he did appear for his one and only time in that period with the young Spencer Tracy). He went back to his stage work in New York City, appeared in THE PETRIFIED FOREST, and returned to Hollywood with his friend Leslie Howard to make the film version there. After the filming of THE PETRIFIED FOREST Bogie was taken seriously as a supporting actor, getting important roles (though as villains) in films like DEAD END and THE ROARING TWENTIES, but also appearing as the lead in films like BLACK LEGION. But his anger at not getting the roles he felt he deserved led to friction with Jack Warner. Warner was like many gifted studio head - producers: he knew that you groom an actor you admire for the right break-out parts. Bogie would not wait, so Warner would punish him by giving him dreck like SWING YOUR LADY. He decided to give him this film too - Warner's answer to the Universal horror and science fiction cycle, THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X.

If this film had been made by Universal with Boris Karloff it is possible that the film would have been a 7 or 8 out of 10. Karloff or Lugosi or Atwill were able to project a mixture of scientific interest, curiosity, and sinister twisting to their scientists and their characters. Maybe it was the sound of their voices (with their staginess or their accents). Bogart did not have this. He sounded like an average Joe with a slight lisp. He just did not project a scientific gambler.

The plot of THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X has nothing to do with an earlier film DOCTOR X that starred Atwill and Fay Wray. That film was pretty good. It was about a series of murders apparently connected with a medical center, where Atwill is one of the leading doctors, and one of the suspects. The plot of THE RETURN OF DOCTOR X is about a series of murders connected to apparent vampirism as the victims are drained of their blood. It turns upon the experiments of a Dr. Francis Flegg (John Litel - trying to be a crusading visionary, but hampered by poor dialog). Flegg is working on a study of human blood, with a way of possibly making an artificial version of it to extend life. However, he has had only one success - a strange man who works with him named Marshall Quesne (Bogart).

Bogart's make-up is the only really interesting thing about him. He has his hair parted in the center, with a white streak of hair in the middle, and wears pince-nez. His face is whitened to look like he is anemic. He tries to act self-deprecating, when talking to others like Wayne Morris (the reporter who is investigating the murders). But he only acts like he is sleep-walking through the lines. Except when he gets upset - at one point he notes part of Litel's blood experiment is failing (and he is very involved in making the experiment work). He starts yelling at Litel about this, much to Morris' interest. But those moments are few - too few.

If the rest of the film had anything going for it, Bogart's failure to make his character live would not matter. But it doesn't. Rosemary Lane and Dennis Morgan (and Morris) give good performances, but other actors (Fay Wray and Joel McCrae and Lee Tracy come to mind) would have vitalized the roles. Huntz Hall, as a newspaper copy-boy, has one good moment - he keeps teasing Morris for his theories regarding dead bodies of the victims in one scene by singing, "When a body meets a body coming through the rye" over and over again. But that said, the film is too flimsy to make one really care who did well in it. Fortunately for Bogie HIGH SIERRA and THE MALTESE FALCON would soon bring him his stardom, and CASABLANCA and THE TREASURE OF THE SIERRA MADRES ensured it.

I give the film only a 3 out of 10, for it's value as a curiosity. The only issue left for me is how would Karloff have been as Captain Queeg or Lugosi as Fred C. Dobbs.
21 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Bogart Movie
fluna103018 August 2008
AAh, good old Dr. X! To some Humphrey Bogart fans, this movie did not go over so well, however, there are those who think this wasn't so bad a movie. I was first introduced to this movie when KZAZ-TV Ch. 11 (now KMSB) would have "Humphrey Bogart Movie Weekend" from time to time. This was shown late Fri. evening/early Sat. morning. Anyways, released in 1939 from Warner Bros./First National pictures, this is the story of unexplained murders & the law along with some other interesting characters who try to find out who is behind these deaths. If I try to go on about this movie, I might give some things away so here is where I'll stop. Although there were some not so good things that were said about this movie, I for one thought this was a "good" movie. If you are a Boggie fan, then you might enjoy this 30's gem. Enjoy!
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I actually like this one better than the original...
AlsExGal28 November 2009
...and I almost can never say that about post-code sequels to precode movies. This really isn't a horror film - it's more of a mystery. A doctor has a mysterious ashen-faced assistant with a Bride-of-Frankenstein like streak of gray in his hair. The assistant seems to always be lurking about, and even though the doctor would obviously like to get rid of this guy for some reason he does not. On top of that, a young woman turns up on the doctor's doorstep one night with this same ashen appearance. She passes out and the doctor instantly knows what to do to restore her to health. Whatever is going on here? Wise-cracking Wayne Morris as reporter Walter Garrett is on the trail of the mystery, and although Morris is no Lee Tracy (Lee Tracy was the reporter in the original) he does a good job. Do note that this is not at all a sequel to the original Dr. X from 1933. In fact I think it's better. I thought the original was slow and somewhat creaky and I've seen far better showcases for the wonderful Lee Tracy than Dr. X.

Of course, the real reason to watch this film is that the ashen-faced assistant is played by Humphrey Bogart in one of the many roles he was ordered into by Jack Warner while he watched James Cagney get meatier showcases. I've always liked this one and it's not just because of Bogey.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I have created a Monster! May God forgive me
sol12188 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
(Some Spoilers) Having discovered the miracle of life through the process of blood De-coagulation Dr.Francis Flegg,John Litel, made the mistake of bringing back to life his first subject the brilliant, but convicted murderer, hematologist Doctor Maurice Xavier, Humphrey Bogart. Feeling that he's much too valuable a person to be taken from the world of science despite his criminal record.

After being executed for murder in the electric chair at Sing Sing Dr. Flegg claimed Dr. X's, as Maurice Xavier is known in the movie, body and pumped a new life back into him. Dr.X now working as Dr. Flegg's assistant is seen moping around the laboratory cleaning up and making himself useful but also learning that he needs a rare blood-type to keep himself alive by having transfusions every few weeks when the blood, from unsuspecting donors, that he has in his system starts to go bad. Trying to perfect a permanent and lasting synthetic blood is something that the brilliant Dr. Flegg can't seem to come up with.This has a blood-thirsty Dr. X to go out hunting for people with his blood-type to keep himself from drying up and dying.

The film "The Return of Dr.X" has wisecracking reporter Walter Garrett, Wayne Morris, come across this amazing secret when an actress, with the same blood-type of Dr.X, that he's supposed to interview Angela Merrova, Lay Lys, is found murdered in her hotel room. Only to come back to life a few hours later due to Dr. Fleggs actions. Later with the help of his doctor friend Mike Rhodes, Dennis Morgan, they find another person with the same blood-type, called group #1 in the movie, professional blood donor Stanley Rodgers, John Ridgely, not only murdered but completely drained of his blood. It becomes apparent that their a link between the two Merrova & Rodgers.

It's later when a conscientious Dr. Flegg decides to stop his experiments in keeping the murderous Dr.X from getting his periodic blood-transfusions that he goes wild murdering Flegg. Later the brought back from the dead Angela Merrova, With the late Dr. Flegg's little black book of people with the rare group #1 blood, goes out looking for new customers to keep Dr. X well stocked and alive with their valuable bodily fluids. Kidnapping nurse Joan Vance, Rosemary Lane, who has blood group #1 Dr. X takes off in a taxi to his old hideout, a duck pub, in Jersey.Then he's then tracked down by Garrett, Joan's boyfriend, and the police and then gunned down in a wild shoot-out.

Humphrey Bogart in the most unusual role of his career as the zombie-like Dr.X who's as white as a sheet with a punk, or skunk, like hair-style is undoubtedly the star of the movie and really the only reason to watch it. You have to sit through the first 25 or so boring minutes of the film "The Return of Doctor X" to finally see him make his grand appearance but after that it's all up hill from then on.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An interesting oddity in Bogart's career...
jluis19848 March 2007
Legendary actor Humphrey Bogart is probably one of the most important figures in the history of American cinema, thanks to his unforgettable performances during the 1940s and 1950s in classics like "Casablanca" (1942), "The Maltese Falcon" (1941) and "The African Queen" (1951), movies that took him to the level of superstar as well as transforming him into an icon of the Film Noir genre of those years. However, success wasn't easy for Bogie, as he spent almost the first decade of his film career playing gangsters and cowboys in low-budget movies. As another of Warner Brothers' stock actors, Bogart had to play whatever the studio wanted him to play, and it was in this way when one of the most interesting oddities in Bogart career happened: he was hired to play a villain in a horror movie, "The Return of Doctor X", a b-movie slated as a sequel to 1932 hit "Doctor X".

In this movie, Wayne Morris plays Walter "Wichita" Garrett, a young reporter recently arrived to New York, who is of course looking for the big note that will make him a regular in the newspaper where he works. Finally he gets an interview with the famous theater actress Angela Merrova (Lya Lys), but when he goes to he apartment in order to interview her, he finds her dead. Strange things begin to happen as the corpse disappears before the cops arrive, and even weirder: Angela Merrova appears alive, making Garrett look like a madman. Without a job, Garrett decides to investigate how is possible that Merrova is still alive, and makes a visit to his friend Dr. Rhodes (Dennis Morgan) looking for answers. Together, Rhodes and Garrett will discover the terrible secret behind Merrova's apparent resurrection and the identity of the man behind it.

While it was presented as a sequel, "The Return of Doctor X" is a completely different story that has absolutely nothing to do with the firs movie, as it is in fact, based on William J. Makin's novel "The Doctor's Secret". Written by Lee Katz, the story has the same pattern typical of mystery and horror films of the 30s (which incidentally, "Doctor X" follows too to a certain extent), with a wisecracking reporter trying to solve a case of serial murders; however, in this film the horror elements are toned down in favor of the mystery. The film flows in a very straight forward way, and while there are some interesting additions (the ending has a slight Noir touch), it doesn't move too far away from the typical formula. However, this is the lesser of the script's problems, but more on that later.

Another oddity of this film is that it was the modest debut as a director of Vincent Sherman, who would become a respected director of melodramas in the 40s, and TV series during the 70s. In this his first film, Sherman's skill to direct actors is already evident, although still in a raw form. An actor himself, Sherman is naturally able to bring the best from his cast, and seems specially keen to allow actors Humphrey Bogart and John Litel to show off their talents in the movie. Of course, this is not a masterpiece and Sherman basically makes his movie a tale of murder and mystery by the book; however, it is notable how entertaining the final result is, specially considering the really flawed script he had to work with.

As written above, the acting is very good for a b-movie of its time, with Wayne Morris delivering a very effective performance as "Wichita" Garrett. His very natural presence allows him to make the character work, even at the sillier parts of the script. Dennis Morgan is also quite good, although a bit too melodramatic for his own good. Rosemary Lane plays Dr. Rhodes' love interest, although her character doesn't really have a lot to do in the story. John Litel delivers a wonderful performance as Dr. Flegg, and along Bogart, is one of the highlights of the movie. Finally, it is legendary how Bogie hated to play Dr. Marshall Quesne in this film, but despite he badmouthing this movie, his performance is truly remarkable. This quirky, wicked and bizarre character manage to become very real thanks to Bogart's professional acting.

Sadly, this is not one of the best examples of this style of horror movies, and not because the mystery is easy to figure out (a common trait in films like this), but because the plot's beginning is so poorly constructed that it requires a bit more than the usual amount of suspension of disbelief to accept the event that starts the film (the disappearance of the corpse being unnoticed is a major plot hole). I don't know if this problem was present in the original novel, but it really damages the development of the script. Still, to Kantz' credit, I must say that he manages to make the story work after this awful start and by the ending it really has turned into something better.

Of course, the main attraction of "The Return of Doctor X" is still to see Humphrey Bogart in a rare role as a horror movie villain, however, and despite the many problems with the script, I think that the film has more to its favor than just an against type performance by Bogie. I feel it truly captures the essence of pulp novels of its time, and works almost as a bridge between the 30s Gothic horror and the 40s era of Film Noir. It is not a very good movie, but fans of Bogie won't like to miss it. 6/10
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bogie in a horror film? Consider me interested.
Hey_Sweden8 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Reporter Walt Garrett (Wayne Morris) stumbles into the biggest story of his career. A fiend is running around draining people of their blood; who could be responsible? Walt, trying desperately to vindicate himself and save his career, does a lot of sleuthing with a friend of his, a young doctor named Michael Rhodes (Dennis Morgan).

Co-star Humphrey Bogart was none too happy to be doing this feature, believing his role was more for the likes of Karloff and Lugosi. But his fans will be greatly intrigued to see him in this one-shot genre role, and certainly Dr. Quesne is one of the creepiest that he ever played. Pasty faced, with a shock of white hair, and given to cuddling bunnies, this *is* a fun character. Basically, what gives "The Return of Doctor X" any stature is the fact that it's Bogart playing this villain.

The story is still punchy and entertaining. Scripted by Lee Katz, it's notable for a lot of lively and sometimes funny dialogue. Morris is quite engaging in the primary role, and Morgan is similarly likable. Rosemary Lane is lovely and amiable as Joan Vance, the dedicated nurse who catches Rhodes's eye. There's an amusing small role for Huntz Hall, and appearances by a number of top character actors - John Litel (as the well meaning Dr. Flegg), Charles C. Wilson, Olin Howland, Creighton Hale, John Ridgely, Glenn Langan, and Ian Wolfe.

The movie benefits from a breezy pace, snappy direction by Vincent Sherman, and a decent finale.

Six out of 10.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pales in comparison with the previous one.
alexanderdavies-9938225 August 2017
There is no way that this horror film from "Warner Bros." can be compared with the 1932 masterpiece. That other film had style, imagination, great acting and direction, plus it was genuinely eerie. This 1939 film is strictly routine fare and at best, is a tolerable programmer. The low budget is in evidence but that has always been the way for most horror films. Humphrey Bogart looks slightly ill at ease in his role of a dead man brought back to life. According to various reports, he slammed his copy of the script across the desk of Jack Warner and demanded more money for having to appear in this particular film. However, at least he is making an effort in being a bit different in his performance and he is the best known actor by far in "The Return of Doctor X." Wayne Morris and Dennis Morgan join forces in order to determine what the mysterious Doctor Xavier has been up to, regarding some of his patients at the local hospital. The actor who plays the evil doctor is rather stiff and dull. No way can he hold a candle to the creepy and effective performance of Lionel Atwill from the 1932 film. The script isn't up to much but the pace of the film keeps everything ticking along agreeably enough. The running time is just over an hour which is a relief.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bogart's presence redeems silly "horror" piece
mgconlan-122 October 2008
I'll admit it: I've got an affection for this somewhat silly film. O.K., so the title is a cheat -- it's not a sequel to the 1932 "Doctor X" (a genuinely chilling movie with excellent starring performances by Lionel Atwill, Preston Foster and Fay Wray) -- and some of the so-called "comedy" involving Wayne Morris is pretty dispensable. There's also Lya Lys, who looks positively spectral even before the script says she is and who holds a sheer scarf in front of her face as if thinking, "Well, this worked for Dietrich … " On the positive side, though, is Humphrey Bogart. Yes, his face looks like someone plastered it with cottage cheese, his hair looks like he got it done at the Bride of Frankenstein Salon and the role would have been far better suited for Boris Karloff (who'd already played a similar part for Warners in a much better film, "The Walking Dead," three years earlier), but Bogart acquits himself well like the true professional he was and makes us believe in the character's suffering as well as his unscrupulousness. It's not much of a role, but Bogart plays it well enough to prove his readiness for bigger and better things — and director Vincent Sherman, though hamstrung by a script that gives him too few opportunities for Gothic atmosphere (only the cemetery sequence even LOOKS like a horror film), also shows his capability for the more important films he got later. I even like the rather clever concept of the plot (though the blending of the Dracula and Frankenstein myths had been done better in Majestic's "The Vampire Bat" six years earlier) and the good-heartedness of the overall attempt by a Warners "B" team to graft a few sci-fi monster elements onto one of their typical newspaper comedies and call it a horror movie.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Little known horror movie surprises viewers with Bogart as mad scientist
mlraymond27 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This odd little B movie is nowhere near as bad as some have described it. It combines the macabre atmosphere of a horror movie with the typical Warner Brothers milieu of a newsroom filled with wisecracking reporters and salty editors. The one real flaw is the annoying character of the reporter played by Wayne Morris. He seems to be a total dimwit, who's constantly making wrong assumptions and blundering around, making a fool of himself. On the other hand, he's clearly meant to be an irritant to the other characters, especially his grouchy boss, editor Joseph Crehan. His friend the doctor, played by Dennis Morgan, is a nice guy involved in a romance with cute nurse Rosemary Lane. The most intriguing aspect is the odd, ambiguous relationship between Dr. Flegg (John Litel) and his pale, peculiarly cold assistant, Kane (Humphrey Bogart). At times, Kane seems afraid of the glowering, taciturn doctor with the goatee and monocle. At others, Kane seems to taunt and sneer at his mentor with a strange glee. When a patient tells them of her need for blood and how weak she feels, Kane nods and smiles with a creepy satisfaction. He stares through his rimless glasses at Flegg and says, " Did you hear that? You'll never find what you're looking for, Flegg! You're a failure!" Flegg angrily orders Kane to get out, and Kane leaves the room with an unsettling grin on his pallid face. This is one of the best scenes in the picture. There are some great supporting character roles, including the old caretaker at the cemetery, a spookily polite undertaker and assorted hardboiled cops and journalists. The exotic European actress Angela Merrova is played by Lya Lys, who previously had been known for her role in Bunuel's L'Age D'Or. This is no classic, but is still worth seeing for the unexpected appearance of Humphrey Bogart in his only horror movie.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Return of the Bogie man!
psychoren200215 November 2006
This is the infamous picture that Humprey Bogart hates, but, no matter what the legend says, is still a funny film to watch. Of course, Bogey characterization of Doctor Xavier is odd, to say the least, but the plot actually makes sense, and his few minutes on screen are a must see. It is not a sequel of "Doctor X" (1932), with Lionel Atwill as the mad scientist, but a complete different story about resurrection of the dead using artificial blood, and Bogie, as a thinking zombie-like killer looks creepy and macabre. The brand new DVD restoration is amazingly clear, and offers another rarity: the theatrical trailer, made in a 90 per cent with deleted or alternate scenes, some of them very different to the final print. Don't miss the chance to see Bogey as a boogie man!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not All That Bad
dougdoepke23 July 2015
Okay, I'm a hopeless vulgarian, but I thought the movie wasn't as bad as many others say. Sure, the material is z-grade, done a hundred times over starting with Frankenstein. But, except for Bogie's horrible make-up applied with a trowel, the movie's not all that hokey. The narrative is well constructed, building little-by-little on what's come before. Namely, why are blood donors being killed, and by whom, and what's aristocratic Dr. Flegg's (Litel) role. In my little view, the screenplay's construction is surprisingly good for a programmer. Plus, Morgan makes a dashing pursuer, along with a stumbling Wayne Morris as a comic-relief reporter. Then there's poor Rosemary Lane (Joan) in a tacked on role, no doubt for marquee purposes. And catch a non-goofy Huntz Hall (Pinky) before the Bowery Boys consumed his career. But who is the mysterious Lya Lys (Merrova), whose close-ups are the scariest thing in the movie. Sure, Bogie's make-up is the hokiest element in the 60-minutes and no doubt the low point of his spectacular career. Meanwhile, he has to take what Warner Bros. gives him. Anyway, the programmer does have its compensations.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bringing In A Consultation
bkoganbing20 October 2008
Humphrey Bogart is credited with seven films in 1939, Warner Brothers kept him pretty busy back in the day before he attained A list stardom. The films vary in quality from a superb supporting performance in Dark Victory, to a gangster classic like The Roaring Twenties, right down to Bogey's one excursion into science fiction of sorts.

As Bogey put it he was in a part better cast by Bela Lugosi or Boris Karloff. With that pasty make up and streak of white in his hair to signify his lack of hemoglobin, Bogey never looked more ridiculous on screen. He'd have to wait until the following year to sound his most ridiculous as a Mexican bandit in Virginia City.

The heroes of this piece are reporter Wayne Morris and doctor Dennis Morgan. Morris goes for an interview with stage star Lya Lys and finds her quite dead. Now this lunkhead decides not to call the police, but instead to scoop the other papers and calls his boss to get out an extra. When the police in the form of Charles Wilson arrive, no Lya Lys dead or alive is to be found. Of course Morris gets fired, especially after Lys shows up threatening lawsuit.

Puzzled Morris brings in a consult his good friend Dr. Morgan and this leads them to John Litel, another doctor working on some ghoulish experiments. He's brought back to life another doctor played by Humphrey Bogart who was also doing some experiments along the same lines.

Litel's created some synthetic blood, but it just ain't as good as the real item and Bogey's on a never ending quest for folks with compatible blood like Lys and nurse Rosemary Lane who Morgan's been seeing.

If you're thinking this plot sounds ridiculous it's just as ridiculous seeing it on the screen big or small. The film certainly did need a classic horror actor like Lugosi or Karloff to give it some life, them not their blood.

Was Jack Warner thinking that maybe if successful this would broaden Bogey's casting range? Who knows because Humphrey Bogart hated this one almost as much as the film he considered his worst, Swing Your Lady.

The Return Of Doctor X has to be seen, especially by fans of Humphrey Bogart, to see just how bad some of his films were before High Sierra and The Maltese Falcon.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fright Night With Bogie
telegonus2 August 2001
This picture isn't bad at all, and is quite entertaining. It's problem is that it isn't very credible. In order to enjoy it one has to put oneself back into the spirit of the late thirties, as the nation was still reeling from the Depression and very much in need this sort of anodyne movie.

Basically it's a mad doctor movie mixed with the sort of breezy newspaper comedy (such as His Girl Friday) then popular. The story has little to do with the first Doctor X movie, which is quite different. Vincent Sherman directs his scenes for maximum suspense and energy, and makes a go at a contemporary horror film set in New York, with brownstones, hospitals and funeral parlors filling in for the usual old dark houses and castles. He succeeds very nicely.

The young leading players are likable but unexceptional. John Litel is, however, very fine as a sane doctor being manipulated by a mad one. The most notable casting is Humphrey Bogart as the resurrected Dr. X, and he is if nothing else visually striking, with his chalky face and hair with a white streak down the middle. He is altogether too familiar to be convincing in the role, which he handles competently.

Overall, I think it's fair to say the movie wasn't meant to be taken too seriously. It was made at a time when horror movies were made for fun as much as fright. Taken on its own terms it delivers the goods, and makes the Warners' standard issue New York streets look as spooky as a graveyard at Halloween.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
dopey and hokey but worth watching
planktonrules29 December 2005
There are some films that are just so weird that they are worth watching. I am a sucker for films with bizarre casting or bizarre plots and this film has got BOTH! Humphrey Bogart, in his days as a minor star at Warner Brothers, hadn't yet found his niche and the studio put him in either gangster films (which he grew to hate after having done so many) or experimented in some of the strangest casting decisions in history such as SWING YOUR LADY (where he was a wrestling promoter in the Ozarks), The Oklahoma Kid (now playing an old west bandit) and this film (where he plays a DEAD maniacal doctor doing experiments to keep himself alive). The plot is of course odd and Bogart looks really weird with a shock of white hair and a waxy skin-tone. It's all good campy fun and is highly entertaining despite its cheese factor! Give it a watch--the sight of him with his skunk-like hairdo and the silly plot make this a film you won't soon forget!

FYI--I forgot to mention one problem with the movie in my initial review. Wayne Morris is cast as a very obnoxious American reporter (the part often played by Lee Tracy in films of the era).
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bogie was right!
beanbag12275614 May 2020
What a stinker. This was to Bogart what "The Silver Chalice" was to Paul Newman: an embarrassment.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed