Topper Takes a Trip (1938) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
If you Liked the Original, You May Like this More
audiemurph21 December 2012
This may be an odd suggestion, but I think this film actually benefited from the absence of Cary Grant. Now I love Cary Grant, but in the original Topper, he is conspicuous by his absence from much of the action, and it is a distraction: after all, he was supposed to be the star. Here, however, we get to focus exclusively on the wonderful Roland Young and the drop-dead gorgeous Constance Bennett.

Young is quite frankly great as the bumbling and often mumbling Cosmo Topper. He is so good at pretending to be pulled, pushed and twisted around by the invisible Mrs. Kirby that you really completely believe unseen forces are constantly roughing him up. And he so thoroughly throws himself into dancing by himself, kicking his feet around in a jig, and kicking at invisible dogs, that it is a real joy.

Have I mentioned that Constance Bennett is gorgeous? How many marriages on the set must have been broken up by her walking around in a bathing suit for a good portion of the film? Billie Burke was also much more interesting here than in the original. The writers surely delighted in giving her so many inane and nonsensical lines, which she, in her well-meaning but confusing daffiness, plays to perfection.

Finally, Franklin Panghorn has a lovely and meaty role as a manager of a French hotel; but his French accent has to be one of the worst ever. Luckily the film is filled with upset, screaming Frenchmen all always yelling at the same time.

I don't think everyone will agree with me, but I found "Topper Takes a Trip" to be at least as enjoyable as the original (except for the long introduction with its extensive borrowing from the original). Highly recommended.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
cute
blanche-228 November 2006
"Topper Takes a Trip" is a nice follow-up to "Topper," and has the same cast but no Cary Grant as George. He's shown in the beginning as the film goes over how George and Marion got to be ghosts in the first place. Alas, Grant's ghostly presence hangs over the entire film and puts a big hole in this movie.

Constance Bennett is her usual gorgeous self as Marion. She is compelled to come back without George and soon realizes that she's there to help Cosmo once again - though the Kerby's idea of helping Topper leaves much to be desired. This time, though, she discovers a dog, Atlas, in spirit also and brings him along. Mrs. Topper (Billie Burke) learning that Cosmo was with a woman in a hotel has sued for divorce. At the trial, Cosmo claims the woman was the late Marion and begs to tell his story.

The judge understandably gets too confused and throws the case out. Mrs. T sails for France and Cosmo, Marion, and Atlas follow. One of the best scenes takes place in a casino where Cosmo just can't help winning, thanks the ball landing on one number and then mysteriously jumping to another thanks to guess who.

Very cute, with another fine performance by Roland Young as Cosmo. The special effects are still marvelous
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
He Had NO Sand in His Shorts!
BaronBl00d7 July 2007
This sequel to the funny Topper lacks the entire sophistication of that film yet is able to stand all by itself as a worthy successor based on the performance of Roland Young once again playing the amusing, befuddled Cosmo Topper - he who sees dead people way before it became fashionable by The Sixth Sense and on a cast of wonderful character actors doing their "bit." Topper Takes a Trip does have some major flaws; however. The film opens with Young in a courtroom going through divorce proceedings from his even more befuddled wife Billie Burke. Topper explains to the courtroom how he was befriended by the ghosts of Constance Bennet and Cary Grant(who could not join his former cast-mates because he was now too big a star but magnanimously agreed to allow them to use footage from the original - Swell Guy!). This whole beginning seems very forced as it tries to make sure that all is explained in case you missed the first film. Once they get out of the courtroom, Topper and one ghost and her ghostly dog go on a drinking binge and discover that Mrs. Topper's best friend has taken her to Paris to try and get her hooked up with a Baron there. Topper and companions follow and the laughs go from a trickle to an avalanche at times as Young does all kinds of crazy things with the aid of his spectral friend. The hotel is headed by Franklin Pangborn whose performance really is a comic treat. Pangborn made me laugh so hard with that sardonic look and witticisms. Butler Alan Mowbray follows and adds a fine turn as the Topper's butler. The rest of the cast is also suitably funny. It is important to remember just how influential these films were in this little sub-genre and that the special effects used were state-of-the-art at the time(Oscar nominated in this case. Many scenes stand out for me as truly masterful bits of comedic timing: Young dancing with a ghost on the dance floor, Alexander D'Arcy(the Baron) being bulldozed by a huge beach ball while shortless in the sand, and Young being cramped in his small room standing out particularly.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wistful, fragile, souffle of a fantasy comedy!
caribeno7 July 2002
"Topper Takes A Trip" is a charming, airy, lyrical fantasy comedy. No one ever made a fantasy comedy like this. The playing of all actors and the set design mix screwball comedy with fantasy elements, making an appealing, sexy, subtly witty comedy that was the best sophisticated comedy feature ever to come out of the Hal Roach Studios.

The cast is a dream. Although all three actors' characters do not appear to each other, the chemistry between Roland Young, Constance Bennett, and Billie Burke is a joy to watch. The musical score by Marvin Hatley not only complements the film beautifully, it features pieces that sound more from the 1960's than 1939. A remarkable score that deserves major recognition by film scholars, students, and buffs.

Roland Young and Billie Burke made several films together for different studios however it was in this film and in Selznick's "The Young In Heart" that showed them at their absolute best as a team. They also deserver greater critical recognition for their work.

The camerawork and set design evoke a polish and sheen common to '30's romantic comedies. A handsome look that stimulates suspending disbelief for a fantasy film. "Topper Takes A Trip" is, undeniably, the best of the three Topper films produced by Hal Roach.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who needs Carey Grant Anyway?
1930s_Time_Machine3 June 2023
This is essentially a continuation of TOPPER. It does need to be watched as a part two of the original film otherwise it won't make sense.

The humour's the same, the feel is the same and actually the jokes are the same. That carbon copy formula worked with AIRPLANE and AIRPLANE II and it works with this too. If you enjoyed TOPPER you'll definitely enjoy this.

There's one obvious difference: no Carey Grant . Constance Bennett therefore has to carry this alone and she accomplishes that seemingly without any effort. You don't miss Mr Grant at all but maybe that's because since this is so much of a continuation, you still think he's been in this anyway, just not in the last few scenes.

It's a silly story with silly characters but being so professionally made and expertly directed and acted, when you're watching this, somehow it feels sort of believable or at least it lowers your credibility filter down to level zero.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
IMHO the weakest of the Topper films
AlsExGal2 March 2019
It recycles considerable footage from the first Topper film as background information. I guess that's a way of getting Cary Grant in there, even though he didn't shoot any new scenes for Topper Takes a Trip. (I bet they used his face in the advertising, too. If I had paid money to see this film, thinking Cary Grant was in it, I would have felt quite disappointed!) Constance Bennett stars as the ghost of Mrs. Kerby. She had some amusing moments, but I personally think she lacked the sparkle and sass of Joan Blondell, who starred in Topper Returns (my favorite of the three entries). The only scene at which I laughed out loud was that of the fortune-seeker on the beach, trying to woo Mrs. Topper while the ghost of Mrs. Kerby thwarts him with unseen hands at every turn. She strips his trunks off him while he's lying under the sand, then torments him with a giant beach ball that inexplicably keeps rolling over him while Mrs. Topper squeaks with alarm. So yes, that was funny, but if I had to choose one of the Topper films never to see again, it would be this one. Billie Burke, as usual, is a scene-stealer, but Alan Mowbray also made a worthy contribution here as the butler Wilkins.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Repairing A Marriage You Damaged
bkoganbing14 January 2007
After creating enough mayhem in the life of Cosmo Topper in the first Topper film, Marian Kerby comes back from the afterlife to do a little more damage than before. She means well of course and by chance things do work out in the end.

Roland Young as Topper, Constance Bennett as Marian, and Billie Burke as the ditzy but patient Mrs. Topper are back again. Cary Grant as George Kerby is here too, but only in a flashback from the original Topper movie. The flashback occurs when Topper is on the witness stand in a divorce case as Billie Burke is filing for divorce. Topper takes the stand and tries to explain that wasn't a real woman in his room, just an other world spirit.

Judge Spencer Charters won't grant a divorce, but come back the next day he might sign some commitment papers. So Billie Burke and her friend Verree Teasdale are off to France. Now it becomes clear what Marian Kerby is back on terra firma for.

Connie and Roland are off to France where they have to deal with fussy hotel managers and pretentious gigolos like Franklin Pangborn and Alexander D'Arcy.

Best scenes in the film, in the casino with Paul Porcasi as the manager and in the bar with Paul Hurst as bartender.

It's not as good as the original Topper film, but still has a lot of laughs left in the old spirit.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Continuity goof
artaxsrv7 September 2005
Not as good as the original, but still fun. Considering Cary Grant's limited (to scenes from the original) presence, they did a good job of pulling off the sequel.

The review omitted a continuity goof. When Topper came around the same curve as the Kirbys and duplicated their bad luck with a flat tire, there was a 'let me back up and see that again' moment. Before the crash we could clearly see that the right rear tire was flat. When the car came to rest, the rear tire was fine and the right front tire was flat. But that just made watching the movie more fun. I didn't catch any other errors, but might on my next watching.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ghostly Encounters--Act Two
Ron Oliver1 July 2004
Cosmo TOPPER TAKES A TRIP--with ghostly Marion Kerby and dead dog Atlas--to the French Riviera in hopes of winning back the estranged Mrs. Topper.

Hal Roach Studios presents more of the adventures of Topper in this follow-up to their previous comedy success. Many of the comic situations are highly reminiscent of the first film, but they are still funny and enough new material has been added to engage and hold the viewer's attention.

Roland Young & Billie Burke return as the Toppers and they are still a delight--Mr. Young owlish & serious in the silliest of situations and Miss Burke forever sweetly vague and befuddled. Gorgeous Constance Bennett, as ghostess Marion, remains free-spirited in her (unwelcome) attempts to help Cosmo out of his latest pickle. Somber Alan Mowbray is also back--and in top form--as the Toppers' devout butler.

Some new costars are on hand to help liven things up: Verree Teasdale plays Mrs. Topper's catty friend; Franklin Pangborn is the oleaginous manager of the Hotel St. Pierre; and suave Alexander D'Arcy provides some laughs as a gigolo baron intent on acquiring Miss Burke's money.

Movie mavens will recognize George Davis as a temperamental porter and Paul Porcasi as a suspicious casino manager, both uncredited. Atlas is played by that remarkable canine thespian, Asta. Cary Grant appears only in footage lifted from the first film.

A couple of scenes in particular are worth waiting for--the first when Topper, with invisible ghostly help, breaks the bank at the French casino's roulette wheel; the second comes when D'Arcy is subjected to humiliating indignities on the beach, courtesy of Miss Bennett and Asta.

This was the second of a 3-film series, coming after TOPPER (1937) and followed by TOPPER RETURNS (1941).
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cary Grant gets replaced by a dog!
PudgyPandaMan13 February 2009
I didn't think this film was nearly as good as the first one. First of all, the original had Cary Grant as Constance Bennett's sidekick. Here, he is inexplicably replaced by a dog. If I were Grant, I'd be highly insulted. I guess maybe by now, he was a mega-star and his salary demands were too high - and, boy that dog sure works for cheap!

I think the whole "let's review the 1st movie" for the first 15 minutes of the film to be a little insulting to our intelligence. Many sequels have been made without feeling it's necessary to rehash the original movie.

Most of the special effects and pranks had been done in the other movie, so it wasn't quite as jaw-dropping this go-round.

But it is still an amusing 80 minutes. Just don't expect it be quite the level of fun as the original.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Roland Young Good, But It's Not The Same Without Cary Grant
ccthemovieman-114 June 2007
This is not as good as the first movie, simply called "Topper," mainly because of the absence of Cary Grant. He helped make the first movie a big success, and without him this movie simply wasn't as good. Grant granted permission to re-run of scene of his from the first film to help set up viewers who hadn't seen the original.

Roland Young as "Topper" keeps this film alive and makes it an acceptable sequel. He is very funny at times and without him, the film would have bombed big-time. Young provides most of the entertainment. Constance Bennett is still the slinky, attractive and well-meaning "Marion Kirby" while Billie Burke, as Topper's wife, is stupid, extremely affected and annoying.

I saw a colorized VHS version of this and it was weak. I'm sure the black-and-white DVD version looks better.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sorry,but canine Mr. Atlas upstages Cary
weezeralfalfa6 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The first film in the Topper series included Cary Grant as Constance Bennett's co-ghost. In the present film, Cary's place is essentially taken by Mr. Atlas(Asta): the talented wire-haired terrier 'actor' in several of The Thin Man film series, and several Cary Grant comedies. I would say, in the context of the films, Mr. Atlas made a more interesting ghost than Cary. Also, the present film clearly is funnier than the original. Who said sequels never live up to the original? Not only Mr. Atlas, but Constance Bennett, as Marion, Roland Young, as Cosmo Topper, and Billie Burke, as Mrs. Topper. are all more animated and funnier than they were in "Topper". Like the other films in this series, it was shot in B&W, but a colorized version was later made of each. The copy at You Tube is colorized. The screen play is about Mrs. Topper seeking a divorce from Cosmo. But, her friend, Mrs. Parkhurst seems much more enthusiastic in pushing for the divorce than is Mrs. Topper. Whereas Mrs. Parkhurst painted Cosmo as an evil man, his wife provided a much more positive assessment of Cosmo. Throughout the film, I wondered about Mrs. Parkhurst's motive for promoting the divorce. Is she being paid by Mrs. Topper? Is she a gold-digger, hoping to wed Cosmo? This latter possibility would seem remote, given the animosity toward Cosmos in the court room. Near the end, she seemed to be getting friendly with the 'baron' she had picked out for Mrs. Topper to wed after the divorce, whom Mrs. Topper ultimately rejected.

The basic plot is rather similar to that for "Topper". Marion wants to do a good deed so that she can return to heaven with her husband.(Perhaps, she did something naughty to be thrown out of heaven?). Namely, she wants to patch up the animosity between Cosmo and Mrs. Topper, which she feels partly responsible for(see "Topper"). She thought she had accomplished that at the end of "Topper", but apparently it didn't last. Since Mrs. Topper's attempt to obtain a divorce locally failed, Mrs. Parkhurst arranged for them to travel to the French Riviera to try there. But, Cosmo, Marion, and Mr. Atlas follow them to the same hotel(Nice detective work!). Mrs. Parkhurst finds a suitable gold digger as a possible replacement for Cosmo. Nothing is said about a divorce hearing there. Cosmo has difficulty explaining why he orders 2 meals and a dog bone with only him evident in his room.

Marion makes Cosmo look foolish numerous times when invisible, but makes up for it in getting him out of bad situations, in winning a fortune for him at the casino, and in getting Mrs. Topper's attention away from the 'baron' and back on Cosmo. Marion now thinks she has done her good deed, and petitions God to let her back into heaven, to be reunited with George(Cary Grant).
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A middle of the road sequel, close but not Dom Perignone.
mark.waltz18 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Why is Marian Kirby still around after Cary Grant's George went off to his final resting place after they helped reunite pal Roland Young and his jealous, suspicious wife Billie Burke in the first film? She did as much as George did, but probably because Constance Bennett was available (and willing) and Grant went onto other projects, producer Hal Roach decided to suspend disbelief and bring her back, now with Asta from the "Thin Man" movies (and Grant's two screwball comedy classics, "The Awful Truth" and "Bringing Up Baby"), as her companion. Prodded by her best friend (Verree Teasdale at her absolute snootiest), Burke is once again separated from Young, and is off for a European trip where Teasdale has pushed her together with obvious gigolo Alexander D'Arcy. Young must once again rely on the ghostly help of Bennett to win his wife back, and this leads to more magical hijinks, which if not as classically funny as the first, are often amusing and clever.

There's truly a sense here that a sequel concerning Marian Kirby was not necessary, and fortunately in the third and final Topper film, a new ghost popped in with one contained plot line that wrapped up neatly. Bennett is still gorgeous to look at, and there is one very clever sequence with invisible Bennett and the very visible Young having drinks, and befuddled bartender Paul Hurst's hysterical reactions to the whole goings on. Alan Mowbray is back as the droll butler, and Franklin Pangborn adds his usual pickle-pussed humor into his role as the manager of the hotel where Burke is staying, and where Young ends up in a basement room that ain't so peaceful. Grant's scenes from the first film really serve no purpose other than to add him into the credits with a special "thank you" that also adds to the feeling that this really didn't serve any purpose other than to play on the success of the original. Other than that, the whole premise really does turn out to be an afterthought that is truly pleasant, but mostly unnecessary.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Flat Followup
oldmovieman10 September 2005
The main characters less Cary Grant reappear for a second act in the Topper saga. Because Marion Kerby materialized by Topper's side in a hotel in the first movie (gasp), Mrs. Topper wants a divorce. Ghostly Marion thwarts the New York divorce proceedings but Mrs. Topper goes to France for a quickie divorce. Topper and Marion follow but, unfortunately, hilarity does not ensue in this slow-moving, predictable farce. The jokes are tedious variations on the first films antics and don't bear reuse; there aren't any really funny moments here. But -- Constance Bennett is gorgeous as always and ever so elegantly dressed. And Roland Young's remarkable physical comedy, e.g., lurching about as if he were being pushed or pulled by the invisible Marion, is worth watching. Bottom line: if you're an old movie buff and want to flesh out the Topper series, invest a few hours when you have nothing else to do and treat it as an educational investment. Don't expect many laughs.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Talk about a Beach Ball !
drednm31 August 2005
Topper Takes a Trip just never gets going. It's an OK comedy sequel to the 1937 smash hit but without Cary Grant. That leaves Marion (Constance Bennett) alone to hound Topper (Roland Young) but the film is missing the marital sparring that made the first one so good.

Mrs. Topper (Billie Burke) is seeking a divorce because Topper and Marion had stayed at a hotel together in the first film. Slim plot device then has the Mrs. heading to France for a quickie divorce where she falls among thieves: her "friend" and a phony baron. Topper and Marion head to France to stop the divorce and foil the setup.

Roland Young is still very good with his blank face and funny body movements (when the invisible Marion is prodding him). But there's just too much talk in this one. Bennett is as always beautiful and breezy. Burke is hilarious as the dithery Mrs. Topper in a way that no one else could copy. Alan Mowbray is back in the thankless butler role as is Spencer Charters as the judge.

Verree Teasdale plays the acid friend, Alex D'Arcy the faux baron, and Franklin Pangborn is the French hotel manager. Grant appears via flashback from the original film, but his absence is not well explained. Asta (the dog) is funny too.

Not a bad film but it could have been funnier.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Relatively weak sequel of "Topper"
johannesaquila30 March 2022
This film starts in court, with the divorce proceedings between Cosmo Topper and his wife. A flashback explains how the events of the original film, Topper (1937), supposedly caused this. However, the real reason (which does not get sufficiently clear until much later) is that Mrs. Topper's lawyer is trying to manipulate her into marrying a French fortune hunter. It appears that the events of the previous film just gave the crooked lawyer an opening that she could exploit.

The original film was based on a novel by Thorne Smith, and this sequel is based on the novel's sequel. The fun-loving dead Kerby couple who previously rescued Mr. Topper from boredom somehow get reactivated from heaven as ghosts to correct the unfortunate side-effect of their good deed. Except that George Kerby (Cary Grant) didn't like the film's script, or wanted more money than was available, or just had something better to do with his time, and so wasn't available. So unlike in the novel, in the film Marion Kerby (Constance Bennett) returns alone. Which comes across as odd because unlike in the novel, the film doesn't portray an actual romance between Marion Kerby and Cosmo Topper, choosing to depict the Kerby marriage as totally harmonious.

For added variety in the invisibility-based slapstick scenes, Marion finds herself a cute dog ghost as a sidekick. Unfortunately, the dog is never really used properly. Like the original film, this sequel could no doubt have profited a lot from breaking the prejudice of the early sound film era and hiring a slapstick expert rooted in the silent film era as an adviser. But they clearly didn't, and so the physical comedy, which should have been the strongest point, again comes across as having the handbrake on. Of course this was true already in the original film.

The original film somehow managed to be above average through a consistently high quality of script and acting. This and Cary Grant seem to be the second most important things missing in this sequel.

At least this is a proper sequel, unlike the second sequel, Topper Returns (1941), which just uses the Toppers for an unrelated though similar ghost story script set in a horror house.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely enchanting
rd110218 March 2006
Ahh, those screwball comedies from the 30's are still a delight, and it is hard to find anything better. The actors in this comedic tour de force are outstanding, and well cast. Roland Young and Billie Burke are pure comedy gold together. No one else could do vague, bemused, bewildered, bedevilled as well as these two. Pair them together, and you have a recipe for instant success. Constance Bennett was a gorgeous blonde in an era famous for gorgeous blondes. Unlike many of the others, she had talent, and was a delight in a comedy. I had seen the series as a child, but I didn't appreciate them until I was an adult. Roland Young's physical comedy, was a definite asset to the series, but his female co-stars, and their delivery was a sheer delight. I also enjoyed Alan Mowbray, who was the suave villain in a few of the Sherlock Holmes films, as the sympathique butler in this little gem of a movie. He was extraordinarily talented, but was woefully typecast as the heavy in many period pieces. I liked this kinder gentler side of the actor, and hope to find something similar from him again. There are no missteps in this one. If you like a nice unsophisticated bit of fluff and froth, you will love this movie. The only thing comparable to me, for entertainment value was "The Women", which came out the same year. Both of the films had me laughing out loud many times, and are films that I watch again and again. Spend some time with Topper, and you won't be sorry, but you will be holding your sides from laughter, and you will appreciate the brilliant comedic timing behind the zingers and barbs that fly in this film.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mildly amusing and nothing more.
planktonrules15 April 2017
Now that I've seen "Topper Takes a Trip", I have seen the three original Topper films. They are all mildly amusing, at best, but the shtick gets a little old after a while.

In the original film, Cosmo Topper (Roland Young) is visited by two ghosts (Cary Grant and Constance Bennett). The film surprised the filmmakers, as it was a hit and folks were clamoring for more...but for some reason Cary Grant didn't agree to do the sequel. I can only assume he had better film projects and in hindsight I think he was probably wise to avoid this one. Instead, believe it or not, they replaced him with a ghost dog!! Uggh!

This installment finds Cosmo fighting to stay married as Mrs. Topper (Billie Burke) is seeking a divorce. This really makes no sense, as she loved Topper...and her suddenly listening to bad friends who want to separate them is pretty awful and far from funny. Well, apparently American divorces take too long so she heads to Paris...and Cosmo goes there to try to stop her from doing this and marrying some Baron. Whatever. The bottom line is that this film seems to scream out "there is NO reason for this film"....and I would definitely agree. Not a terrible film...but not a good one. Oddly, the third film (starring Young, Burke and Joan Blondell as the ghost) is probably the best of the three movies.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A fun trip
TheLittleSongbird8 July 2020
Really loved the first 'Topper' and found it a much needed sheer delight. Nearly everything worked, aside from the occasionally draggy pace but the production values, script and performance enlivened the proceedings significantly. It was succeeded by two sequels 'Topper Takes a Trip' and 'Topper Returns', hearing about them left me with mixed emotions. Either they could have been just as good and gone well with the original or they could have been completely pointless.

Both of them in my view are worth watching and while neither are as good or in the same league as the first 'Topper' they are nearly as good. The first of them 'Topper Takes a Trip' has almost everything that made the original such a delight, it may lack Cary Grant (excepting a not particularly necessary and shoehorned in flashback to the original) but Constance Bennett, Roland Young and Norman Z McLeod in the director's chair all return and have not lost what made them work so well in the first.

There are a couple of other things that stop 'Topper Takes a Trip' from being even better than it turned out to be. The beginning does go on for too long and felt very contrived.

Also found that Billie Burke overdid it in her part here and came over as irritating.

However, Bennett once again is a joy. She is very elegant and again has a lot of fun in her role while not over-egging. Young also looks like he was enjoying himself, he copes with the physical comedy with aplomb and grace and he is both amusing and likeable. The supporting cast standout is a riotous Franklin Pangborn with Verree Teasdale close behind, neither straining for laughs and looking completely natural. McLeod again does a spirited job with the directing without letting things get too manic.

Once again, the production values are great. 'Topper Takes a Trip' is beautifully shot with opulent art direction. The special effects hold up well. The music matches the whimsy of the film's tone more than fittingly and the sophistication and wit in the dialogue remains still. The story is silly but never loses its spirit and charm, it's always fun too.

In summary, lovely first sequel if not quite as good. Stick with it if put off by the start, it's worth it. 8/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Music ripped off?
trevorbryant27 December 2019
Someone explain this to me. This movie was released in December 1938 as a sequel to Topper. In the film you will hear a refrain from the music of The Wizard of Oz, it repeats throughout the movie. The music composer is listed as Hugo Friedhofer, he was a contract studio composer. The Wizard of Oz was released almost a year later, the composer was Herbert Stothart who won the Academy Award for Best Score for the Wizard of Oz. It seems to me that Mr. Stothart simply ripped off a contract employee of the Studios. A familiar story? Close your eyes and watch Topper Takes A Trip on TCM, you will swear it's the Wizard of Oz.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cosmo's Ghostly Venture
lugonian13 July 2020
TOPPER TAKES A TRIP (United Artists, 1938), a Hal Roach Presentation, directed by Norman Z,. McLeod, marks the second of three in the series, and its first for United Artists. Reuniting its major stars (Constance Bennett, Roland Young, Billie Burke and Alan Mowbray) and production staff from the original TOPPER (1937), with the exception of Cary Grant, whose scenes are retold via flashback, TOPPER TAKES A TRIP, based on the novel by Thorne Smith, basically resumes where the original left off, with more of the same antics as before, with new locale settings during its second half.

The story opens where divorce proceedings are being held behind closed doors of a courtroom involving Cosmo Topper (Roland Young), a New York City bank president, and his wife, Clara (Billie Burke). Accompanied by Clara's close friend, Nancy Parkhurst (Veree Teasdale), it appears Mrs. Parkhurst to be the instigator to the divorce rather than Mrs. Topper. While on the witness stand, Cosmo recalls his incident at the Seabreeze Hotel where he was seen to be with Marion Kerby, but was all innocent. Cosmo also tells the court under oath that both Marion and her husband, George, are spiritual beings. In the meantime, Marion (Constance Bennett) returns to Earth without George, and can only enter the Pearly Gates after doing her good deed. Reading a newspaper clipping about Cosmo Topper being sued for divorce, Marion, accompanied by a ghost dog named Atlas (Skippy), decides to assist Cosmo once more in her good deed by saving his marriage. Because Cosmo's story on trial seems so unbelievable, the judge (Spencer Charters) dismisses the case and denies the divorce. Nancy, however, decides it best for Clara to get her divorce by taking her on the next ship over to France, where she has gotten all her previous divorces. Learning of Clara's whereabouts from his butler, Wilkins (Alan Mowbray), Cosmo, accompanied by the blithe spirits of Marion and her dog, Atlas, journey to the French Riviera, registering at the St. Pierre Hotel followed by further ghostly antics between Cosmo and Marion that not only get him in trouble with the hotel staff as it did at the Seabreeze Hotel back in the states, but finds he has to save Clara from a fortune hunter, Baron DeRossi (Alexander D'Arcy) out for her money.

The talents of a well-selected group of character actors consist of Franklin Pangborn (Louis, the Hotel Manager); Paul Hurst (Charlie, the Bartender); Paul Porcasi (The Roulette Croupier); and Irving Pichel (The Courtroom Prosecutor). Pangborn, notable for playing hotel managers in countles movies, speaks with a French accent this time around. Alan Mowbray, who has little to do here, resumes his loyal servant duties with his notable line, "Bless our happy home."

TOPPER TAKES A TRIP has its moments in spiritiual humor, with fine special effects of ghostly figures fade ins and outs compliments by Roy Seawright. Comedy highlights include Cosmo and Marion getting drunk in a bar; Cosmo winning at the gambling tables in France; and Marion placing the Baron in an embarrassing situation while covered by sand at the beach without his swimming trunks. Constance Bennett as the glamorous ghost shows her flare for comedy once again. It's a wonder how her spirit changes clothes and hairstyles in almost every other scene, indicating the Heavens above include clothing stores and hair salons for her convenience. If she's a ghost, then she wouldn't be starving for food in the restaurants. Unlike her Mrs. Topper from the previous movie, Billie Burke's character becomes more scatterbrained speaking in higher pitches. Overlooking some pros and cons, TOPPER TAKES A TRIP, being more of a rehash from TOPPER than an original premise, is an agreeable comedy.

Clocked at 80 minutes, with some indications the movie might have been longer prior to its editing process, TOPPER TAKES A TRIP is the lesser known of its trilogy due to fewer television showings as opposed to the more frequently revived TOPPER and TOPPER RETURNS (1941). Formerly available on video cassette and later DVD, TOPPER TAKES A TRIP had cable television broadcasts over the years, including the Disney Channel (1986), Nickelodeon's Nik-at-Night Movie (1988) and Turner Classic Movies since 2006. (***)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Please take out your passport as you cross the border into whimsy
jarrodmcdonald-11 March 2014
The film picks up where the original story left off. If you haven't seen the first Topper, there are several flashback scenes at the beginning to bring you up to speed. This is classic screwball comedy combined with supernatural fantasy, something that seems to match writer Thorne Smith's particular talents and Hollywood's fascination with anything and everything whimsical.

Roland Young is impressive as the befuddled title character and Billie Burke delights audiences as his wacky wife. The issue one has with the series is not its continual use of thinly stretched gags (playing on the idea that only Topper can communicate with the dead), but rather its obvious use of camera editing to create magical special effects.

For example, ghostly Constance Bennett drinks a martini that seems to disappear one gulp at a time (obviously accomplished by stopping the film, emptying some of the alcohol, then resuming camera action). Most viewers probably see such an effect as fake and contrived. Despite the basic technology, the film does retain appeal, thanks in large part to the winning performances of its actors. Especially Miss Bennett who adds an element of glamour to the whole affair.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I Just Can't...
smithjlj-0833925 July 2020
I've watched the first and third Topper films and I was willing to overlook the fact that a ghost apparently can eat, drink, and smoke cigarettes for the sake of some of the other comedy sequences. However, three movies of this is just too many. I mean Marion can't pass thru the safe door to get Topper's passport, but she can drink? Now the dog is in on it too? No. I'm sorry.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10/10
verakomarov16 October 2021
Mrs. Topper's friend, Mrs. Parkhurst, persuaded Mrs. Topper to file for divorce from Cosmo, because of the strange circumstances of his journey with the ghost of Marion Kirby. Marion returns from the gates of heaven to help Cosma again, this time only with the dog Mr. Atlas. Because of Cosmo's strange behavior, the judge refuses to divorce them, so Mrs. Parkhurst takes Mrs. Topper on a trip to France, where she tries to agree on the final reasons for the divorce, with the help of a Frenchman digging for the baron's gold. Marion takes Cosmo to the same hotel, to reunite them and get her last ticket to heaven, but the whole thing didn't turn out to be so easy...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Topper, Take A Hike
Handlinghandel31 August 2005
The Topper movies do not hold up well today for several reasons. Two are primary: Through no fault of their own, the gimmick of disappearing and reappearing has become very ho-hum in large part because of television shows like "I Dream Of Jeannie" and "Bewitched." ("Blithe Spirit" is another movie affected by this, also, of course, retroactively.) Equally significant is their reliance on the ostensible hilarity of being drunk. We know today that is not funny and finding these movies charming is therefore very difficult.

This first sequel, also, is very routine. It begins with clips from the original Topper movie, with Constance Bennett (in this movie too) and Cary Grant, who is not in the movie itself.

Many of the performers are great character performers but their characters are not filled out. They are sketched in. Billie Burke and Alan Mowbry are among those who suffer. Not to mention Franklin Pangborn, playing a desk clerk as he frequently did but here a desk clerk in Paris who speaks English with a (bad) French accent.

The two standouts are D'Arcy as a baron who woos the Burke, who is separated from Roland Young (also a fine performer but just not funny in these movies.) The scene on the beach in which invisible Constance Bennett snatches away his bathing suit is about as close as the plot gets to genuine humor.

Veree Teasdale, as Burke's tough society woman pal, walks away with the whole thing. She is extremely funny. Is her role a bit of stereotype? Yes. But the writers fleshed it out
2 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed