21 Days Together (1940) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Anguish for Vivien and Larry
jjnxn-120 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
British drama of young lovers caught in a dastardly conundrum. Larry has committed a crime in self defense which because of circumstances would appear as murder to most. Add in Larry's reputation as a bit of a gadabout and trouble is brewing. When the pair try and leave the body to be discovered in settings that would lead to no blame being placed a tramp comes along and clouds the waters by removing an item from the body. Unwilling to come forward unnecessarily but equally unwilling to let an innocent man die they turn to his barrister brother and await the verdict which will take 21 days to be announced. On that pivot turns the tale.

Obscure film is one of only three co-starring vehicles for the famous Leigh/Olivier team, its an ordinary drama of note only for their participation. Made in '37 but not released until Vivien had made an enormous splash as Scarlett O'Hara, though she still has the more rounded appearance of her early English films. Olivier is at the very peak of his attractiveness.

British to its backbone this is worth catching up with but both the pair's other movies are better films.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-worth watching
mouton18903 June 2008
Although released in 1940 this picture was made in 1937, well before Leigh and Olivier were married. Producer Alexander Korda intended it as a career-boosting role for Leigh but, for whatever reasons, it was put-aside. Columbia bought the property in 1939 and released it after Leigh's success in "Gone with the wind".

The 1937 date explains what must seem to be an anomaly for modern audiences - the sympathetic treatment of the "Axis" characters, ie the German landlord and the Italian grocer.

Well-worth watching - the depth of talent in the supporting roles (Francis L Sullivan, Hay Petrie, Robert Newton etc) is notable.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Glove Lane Murder!!!
kidboots28 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It is hard to believe that Vivien Leigh made only a dozen more films after this and then it was the end. "21 Days" was filmed in 1937 but not released in the U.S until 1940 when the two stars (Laurence Olivier and Vivien Leigh) were both taking the acting world by storm. If they hadn't, Olivier said "the movie would never have been released as we were both terrible in it"!! I don't think they were bad, there were just no sparks to show the world that they were really in love. Leslie Banks, on the other hand, was always excellent in everything he did and this part as Keith Durrant, Larry's successful brother, was no exception. He is the character you remember - all Larry and Vivien had to do was to gaze lovingly into each other's eyes, go on a shopping spree and try to spend the 21 days (the duration of the trial) as blissfully as possible ie there is a wonderful sequence of a happy day spent at Southend.

When scapegrace Larry accidentally kills a man, he turns to his brother for help. Keith is all for getting Larry out of the country for he is a successful barrister who is soon to be made a judge and doesn't want any skeletons coming out of the closet. The man Larry kills is the suddenly turned up husband of Wanda (Leigh), the girl he loves. Miss Leigh hardly looks old enough to have left school let alone have a husband in her dim dark past. A chance meeting with a philosophical beggar and Larry loses his gloves, the beggar picks them up and you can guess the rest in this quite predictable murder yarn.

The beggar is picked up and Keith leaves no stone unturned in his effort to keep Larry in the clear. Even though Vivien Leigh was top billed (I suppose it was released after her magnificent performance in "Gone With the Wind") she didn't have much to do. Robert Newton had a small role as the enthusiastic lawyer who is convinced his client, the beggar, who constantly repeats that on that particular night he lost his self respect, is not guilty. I think Alexander Korda planned to release it after "Fire Over England" (1937), to capitalize on the couple's sizzling romance which was almost becoming a scandal but realized it was nothing more than a quota quickie and so withdrew it until a better time.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Vivien pre-Scarlet and England pre-War
AlsExGal13 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is a rather interesting tale of an accidental killing that turns both into a travesty of justice and battle of conscience for the one responsible for the killing.

Lovers Wanda (Vivien Leigh) and Larry (Laurence Olivier) are in the honeymoon phase of their love, when one night they enter Wanda's apartment and there is a guy who somewhat resembles Jabba the Hutt claiming to be Wanda's estranged husband and trying to put the squeeze on her - for money not affection. He's three times Larry's size, but when he gets physically aggressive Larry fights back and manages to get his hands around his neck. He only means to hold on until the man stops fighting, but unfortunately he does not stop fighting until he dies.

Why doesn't Larry call the police and explain things? This is never clear. Maybe he doesn't want Wanda embroiled in a scandal - carrying on with Larry when married to another although estranged. Maybe he believes he will not be believed. But then, maybe he is also worried for the reputation of his brother who has just been named a judge.

So Larry carries this huge man's body and tries to place it outside in such a way that he MIGHT be considered some homeless person who just died of exposure if the police are sloppy. Too bad, the police are not sloppy, and worse they arrest an ex-minister who has become a bum and who confesses to the police "he has lost his self respect" and "done a terrible thing". But that terrible thing was to steal some money and the ring of the dead man once he knew he was dead. No matter, the police arrest the minister, a guy with no known violent past, for killing somebody he obviously did not know.

Meanwhile, Larry has confessed all to his brother, who advises both he and Wanda burn all things showing that they have ties to each other and not see each other until this blows over. Apparently Larry's brother the judge doesn't have any faith in the British justice system either, or maybe he is just afraid of the scandal and his own career. He assures Larry the minister will never hang for something with such circumstantial evidence.

Well Larry shows up at the arraignment. In spite of the fact that it is obvious that the minister, if not innocent, is at least touched in the head, he is held over for trial in three weeks. Larry ignores his brother's advice to leave the country and avoid Wanda and says he will take his next quarter's allowance, spend frivolously on Wanda, enjoy their 21 days - the time to the trial - and then turn himself in.

This next part of the film, with Larry and Wanda basically having what amounts to a 21 day holiday, is the best part of the film. Not so much because of the plot or acting, but because you get a good look at England two years before WWII started, and it is interesting to look at the buildings and even amusement parks before the bombing gutted London. You could almost equate Larry and Wanda to pre-war England. They know possibly bad things are ahead in the near future, but in spite of that life carries on for them, for awhile anyways. Also notice that Larry has a good natured good hearted German landlord with whom he strikes up quite a friendship, protecting him from his skinflint Scottish wife. How weird this must have looked when it was released in 1940.

I just noticed a few more odd things. Larry is considered the wastrel of the family, but it is he who has a conscience both about a killing he did in self defense and the fate of a wrongly accused man. His brother, the honored judge, seems only interested in preserving the family name and his reputation. Yet he is the one sitting in judgment of others and has high social status.

I'd recommend it for a whole bunch of reasons that really have nothing to do with the plot, probably most of all a chance to see both Laurence Olivier and Vivien Leigh before they had great fame acting in a film together before Olivier's long drawn out divorce from Jill Esmond could be finalized and he and Vivien could be married.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well played out story ...
dwpollar12 March 2001
Well played out story of a weak man(Olivier) who kills someone thru self-defense and then decides to hide the fact with his girlfriend(Leigh). His brother(running for Judge duties) helps in the cover-up. Unexpected ending a little disappointing, but follows with the character.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
disappointed
blanche-27 September 2015
I was disappointed in this film, but it's my own fault. I went into it thinking it was some marvelous mystery or noir.

"21 Days Together" has an interesting history. Released in 1940, it was actually made in 1937 but for some reason not released. After Gone with the Wind, I suppose there was a lot of interest in Leigh and the film was released.

The Leigh role was to be played by Vera Zorina, but obviously she didn't do it and Leigh won the role.

The story concerns a young couple in love, but the woman, Wanda (Leigh) is married but not living with her husband. He shows up and attempts blackmail, but gets into a fight with her lover Larry (Olivier) who accidentally kills him.

A man who stole something off of the body is arrested for murder and found guilty. The couple has three weeks together before Larry must give himself up or let an innocent man hang. His brother, who is up for a judgeship, is determined that Larry not admit to the crime.

This film was not close-captioned and, as I am a little hard of hearing, it was difficult to understand some of the dialogue.

I found this an okay drama, well acted for the most part.

Leigh and Olivier made a beautiful couple, and it's always nice to see them together, young and in love. Makes you sad about how it ended.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Rock and a Hard Place
Hitchcoc8 February 2013
Apparently this is one of those Galsworthy dilemma stories. In it Olivier, early in his career inadvertently kills a man, the estranged husband of his new love. He is faced with the considerable struggle with conscience because a man has been blamed for the act and will face the music. What to do. What to do. We are put in the position of hoping all will somehow work out. I won't spoil the ending, but I will say that Olivier's character could have been sent to the gallows for terminal boredom. At no point did I really care one way or the other. He is selfish in many ways and rather cowardly. While the victim is made to have no redeeming qualities, his death really serves nothing other than that of a plot element. I suppose there is some of that stiff upper lip stuff going on, but at no time did I sit on the edge of my seat. Contrast this to the pain of Jean Valjean who faces a similar question. In that we all need to look inward. This just didn't ask much of me, and I was also greatly disappointed with the conclusion.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Larry and Viv, it wasn't THAT bad...
jem13212 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Made in 1938 but shelved until 1940 when the two stars were captivating the world as Scarlett O'Hara and Heathcliff (Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier, of course!) this is a very slight little film that is typical of the low-budget stuff producer Alexander Korda was churning out in Britain throughout the 1930's. Modest, inoffensive, rather stiffly acted and implausibly scripted, "21 Days" is decent enough entertainment and I guess a "must-see" if you are fans of the Oliviers. Larry plays Larry, the ne'er do well brother of an aspiring judge (Leslie Banks) who accidentally kills his girlfriend's (Vivien Leigh) husband. Olivier still wasn't that comfortable with the film medium and you can see it here, while Leigh doesn't have much to do except look very pretty and act concerned. Leigh and Olivier famously caught a US screening of this in 1940 and left halfway through and got roaring drunk because they thought it was that bad! Hmm, while it's often cited as the worst film Leigh was in, I prefer it a lot to the con-fuddled mess that is "Dark Journey".
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rather good.
Sleepin_Dragon24 August 2020
There are many barriers to love, most can be overcome, but is murder one such obstacle, can a couple allow an innocent man to take the blame for their crime?

It's not as good as some of the movies I've seen from this era and in the same genre, but it is good, it's very watchable, and let's be honest, anything that features Vivian Leigh is worth watching.

It's perhaps a lack of suspense that is the stumbling block, you're left in no doubt as to the ending.

It's a good watch though, nicely made, and very well acted, 6/10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Delayed release
bkoganbing9 December 2016
According to the Citadel Film Series book on the Films of Laurence Olivier 21 Days was made immediately after Olivier and Vivien Leigh met on Fire Over England. But was shelved after Alexander Korda was not pleased with the results. Later when after Leigh scored so well in Gone With The Wind and Olivier in Wuthering Heights in Hollywood and became international names it was decided to release this film. The team appeared in Fire Over England and That Hamilton Woman and this film is definitely inferior to both of those.

It did have potential though, the story comes from John Galsworthy though it's hardly the Forsyte Saga. It concerns Olivier as the ne'er do well younger brother of barrister Leslie Banks who is about to get a big judicial appointment. Olivier has been keeping company with Leigh and then Esme Percy shows up claiming to be her husband. During a struggle Olivier comes out the victor and Percy's body is left on the street to be discovered.

A murder involving his brother might just kill that appointment so Banks works a cover-up and Olivier and Leigh get out of town to a romantic idyll.

The suspense and the romance don't really gel that well together in 21 Days. Possibly someone like Alfred Hitchcock could have made this work. I will say the ending is something out of Hitchcock.

21 Days is about 15 days too long.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Viv and Larry - together!
calvertfan3 April 2002
A must see for all Viv and Larry fans - how much better can you get than a movie where Olivier's character is actually called Larry, with Leigh's Wanda saying such lines as "I love you LARRY"? Awww, it's perfect! She's tiny and sweet, he's dashing and handsome, and together there's almost no better pair.

Larry kills Wanda's husband - whom she has not seen for 3 years - in self-defence, then leaves the body in the street. Another man is held for trial over the murder, and Larry stays quiet, deciding that if the man is announced innocent then it will be OK, but if the man is proclaimed guilty, he will own up. The verdict is in 3 weeks, so he and Wanda make the most of what little time they may have left..
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A stronger, more compelling drama than I expected
I_Ailurophile5 March 2023
Of all the dramas that have ever graced the Silver Screen, some are better than others. Save for the very noteworthy cast, I don't know that there's anything so remarkable about '21 days' as to demand viewership. Yet its tale is suitably compelling to keep one watching, with surprising variety and balance squeezed into only 72 minutes. I didn't necessarily expect much when I sat to watch, but ultimately I find myself quite pleased with just how good this is.

Weirdly enough all the most significant characters are sympathetic in one fashion to another, if to different degrees: Wanda, the innocent romantic; Larry, the conflicted lover; Keith, the upstanding citizen and loyal brother; John Evan, the extraordinarily guilt-ridden vagrant. The dynamics between these characters, and the law's investigation of a homicide, provide all the fuel necessary for a slight but delicious film. Even outside those principle characters, other supporting figures are given delightful quirks to help them stand out. The dialogue is quite smart at points, as is the scene writing, and the narrative at large offers a tad more complexity than one might commonly assume of titles form this era, especially those of such relatively abbreviated length. Through to the very end '21 days' rather successfully inculcates minor airs of tension and suspense. My commendations to director Basil Dean and co-writer Graham Greene, for their adapted screenplay is richer than I supposed from the outside looking in.

True, there are tinges of ham-handedness at points that are a little excessive. The transitions that the editors employ are a bit needlessly embellished. Yet these seem like such minor considerations in the grand scheme of things, especially when the whole is broadly so engaging and satisfying. Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier have splendid chemistry and give noteworthy performances in what are the two chief roles; Leslie Banks and other co-stars are steady presences. Dean's direction is firm and mindful, neatly complementing his writing, and all facets of the production contributed from behind the scenes are just swell. This may be a picture in which the storytelling is specifically the key, but no one involved was a slouch by any means.

Again, this may not be an absolute must-see, or something to go out of your way to see. It's entertaining and very deserving, but perhaps not so grabbing as to be an essential drama. All the same, I'm pleasantly surprised by how well done the feature is, and how enjoyable. If you do have the chance to check out '21 days, then as far as I'm concerned this is well worth a mere 72 minutes of one's time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Man in the Dock
richardchatten21 November 2021
Graham Greene here made an inauspicious entry into film writing converting a John Galsworthy story he himself considered "peculiarly unsuited to film adaptation" into "the worst and least successful of Korda's productions".

Olivier and Leigh, the gilded young lovers of the Old Vic, had yet to learn how to act before the cameras in this overwrought melodrama with a noisy score by John Greenwood which spent two years on the shelf before eventually slipping quietly into cinemas only after both leads had hit it big in Hollywood.

There are compensations, however, in the graceful work of it's Czech cameraman, some vivid shots of London as it looked in 1937, and above all a moving performance - twelfth in the cast list - by Hay Petrie, who Greene himself declared "enriches every picture in which he appears.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
21 Days Together for Olivier and Leigh, but For Us...A Pretty Short Movie
chauge-7325328 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
What happens when you kill your lover's estranged husband? Three weeks to party during the trial of the wrongfully accused man before you fess up I guess. That's what happens when Larry (played by Laurence Olivier), gets into a tussle with the estranged husband of her lover Wanda (played by Vivien Leigh) and ends up killing him in self defense after the husband pulls out a knife. Worried that his status as a homewrecker would prejudice a jury against him, he stashes the body in an alley hoping that the murder will be deemed unsolvable. When a homeless man he meets on the way back is given his gloves, the police finger him for the murder. Larry becomes torn between the ensuing guilt and wanting to continue his relationship with Wanda. Encouraging him to let the homeless man take the fall is his attorney brother Keith, (played by Leslie Banks) who doesn't want a family scandal interfering with his plans to become a judge. While the moral quandry is played out over the average 21 days that the trial is estimated to take, Larry and Wanda decide to live their lives to the fullest in London until Larry reluctantly swoops in at the last minute to save the man before he goes to jail and take his place. Kind of a queasy concept, although it is worth the watch to see an early Vivien Leigh, who filmed the movie three years earlier than the release date in 1940. She looks radiant in every scene and is worth the price of admission just to watch her do her thing, even if it is a supporting role to Olivier. As other reviewers have stated, Olivier unfortunately is not quite used to the differences in movie acting versus stage acting yet, and tends to shout his lines and overemote as if he's projecting to the back row. The plot is serving to it's 72 minute runtime, as I didn't really feel cheated that it ended soon. It didn't need to be longer. The movie is mostly the two of them going on dates until the final decision is made. Not a bad movie but Olivier and Leigh definitely have their best work ahead of them.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
we know who-dunnit....spoilers
ksf-226 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS ahead... 21 Days... known as 21 Days Together in the U.S., is a brit production, from Columbia. according to the trivia, this was actually made before Vivien Leigh made Gone with the Wind; Laurence Olivier was best known for Wuthering Heights and Rebecca (Rebecca is awesome!). which also explains why there's no talk of war yet. In the story, Larry is going with Wanda, but it turns out she's married. and the husband turns up demanding money. they tussle in Wanda's apartment, and now the husband is dead. the coppers arrest someone for the moidah, so wanda and Larry agree that if they find the innocent guy guilty in court, Larry will step forward and confess. like an episode of Three's Company, everything get fouled up, misunderstandings ensue. at one point, Larry even wonders if he should give himself up. clearly, he should have. but people just don't seem to do the right thing in the heat of the moment. so it's hard to feel any sympathy for him. but maybe that awkwardness or mixed emotions is what the author (John Galsworthy) wanted us to feel. so Larry goes to his brother (Leslie Banks), and they come up with a plan. as the weeks play out, we see what happens to Larry and his brother. i personally thought it was quite unlikely that Larry and Wanda would go to the amusement park while all this was going on. it pretty good, has a couple shortcomings. Directed by Basil Dean. didn't direct anything too famous, but was better known for writing, and for starting production companies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Bloody Glove of Glove Lane!
hitchcockthelegend22 August 2012
21 Days is directed by Basil Dean and adapted to screenplay by the director and Graham Greene from John Galsworthy's play The First and Last. It stars Vivien Leigh, Laurence Olivier, Leslie Banks, Francis L. Sullivan and David Horne.

When Larry Durrant (Olivier) accidentally kills his lover's husband, he decides to hide his crime and the couple embark on a whirlwind romance for the next twenty one days. However, with an innocent dupe on trial for the murder, Durrant's conscience begins to get the better of him.

If it didn't feature Olivier and Leigh then this would have been consigned to the forgotten bin and sealed up post haste. That the stars give it a curiosity value is a given, but one peak at the meagre back story backs up the fact that it really is rather a dull movie. Film was wrapped in 1938 but sat on the shelf for two years and was only released once Olivier and Leigh became big names in 1940. The two stars were more interested in playing footsie under the table than putting any acting depth into the production, something which greatly annoyed director Dean as he was trying to make a gripping crime drama. In fact Viv and Larry were so unhappy with how the film ended up, they reportedly walked out of a screening of it at the halfway point!

Picture is clearly meant to be a scathing observation on the folly of criminal law, wrapped around a male protagonist battling his moral codes as his heart goes pitter patter for a dame. Yet the picture rarely reaches dramatic heights, playing out more as a movie about young lovers inconvenienced by an accident, than one about a cruel twist of fate so pay your penance you loser. Olivier gives good quality mental anguish, again that is a given, but Leigh is just on the sidelines looking pretty and rarely impacting on the narrative. The other cast members work well enough, but everyone seems confused as to just what sort of tone to aim for, in fact taking their queues from Larry and Viv. While the ending lacks an edge, playing out more as a cheap cop out than anything else, geared once again towards how lovely the central couple are together.

Somehow finding its way into a British film noir DVD collection, that's a bit of a bum steer. However, little snippets of visual pleasures do provide bright spots in the viewing experience. The few scenes involving a foggy London of wet back streets and street lamps hint at where the director hoped his movie would dwell, and with cinematographer Jan Stallick photographing continually with shadows prominent, there's just enough to keep it from being a complete wash out on the tech side of things. Ultimately it's very disjointed, a tonally confusing picture in search of a more dramatic and thrilling home, director Dean knew it, producer Alexander Korda knew it, and crucially, so did Olivier and Leigh. Only the most staunch (biased) fans of the two stars can seriously think this is a good movie. 5/10
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A limp and unconvincing romantic thriller
GusF19 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the 1919 play "The First and the Last" by John Galsworthy, this is a limp and unconvincing romantic thriller. The second of only three films that Laurence Olivier and Vivien Leigh made together, it was filmed in 1937 but not released for almost three years, by which time its two stars had made names for themselves in Hollywood. Olivier later said that he believed that the film may never have been released otherwise as it was so dreadful and he and the future Lady Olivier were so dreadful in it. While I would not go quite that far, I don't think that anyone involved gave it pride of place on their CV. It is certainly my least favourite of the Olivier films that I have seen. It is badly written by Basil Dean and Graham Greene (even Homer nods) and the former's direction leaves a great deal to be desired.

The film concerns Larry Durrant, the ne'er-do-well younger brother of the prominent barrister Keith Durrant who is soon to be appointed to the bench, and his lover Wanda. On April 21, 1938, Larry and Wanda return home from a romantic trip to the pawnbroker's and find that her husband Henry Wallen, whom she hasn't seen in three years, is waiting for them in her flat. Henry threatens to kill Wanda and Larry accidentally kills him. He later places his body in an archway not far from Wanda's house. Fearing the shadow that it will cast on his legal career, Keith advises Larry not to tell the police, even after a harmless vagrant named John Evan is arrested and charged with murder. In spite of the very circumstantial evidence, Evan is remanded for trial in three weeks.

After learning that Henry was a bigamist, Larry and Wanda get married and try to fit 30 years into 21 days. Larry has decided that he will come forward if Evan is convicted but not if he is acquitted. As it turns out, Evan is convicted and sentenced to death - after a one day trial, mind you - but dies that very night so Larry is off the hook. This is supposed to be a happy ending but it isn't as a wrongly convicted man has died, probably due to stress, and his name will never be cleared. This happens so that two dippy characters can live happily ever after. Considering Larry acted in self-defence, one would hope that this justification would be successful in court and he would be found not guilty so there is a very good chance that they could have lived happily ever after even if he had done the right thing. However, they would rather a very nice and, far more importantly, innocent man be considered a murderer.

Olivier's performance as Larry (which is what he liked to be called in preference to Sir Laurence or Lord Olivier in later life) is not one of his best but it is nevertheless the best in the film. He makes the film and its flawed, poorly thought-out plot all the more bearable as I couldn't help but pay attention to his great skill as an actor whenever he was on screen. Leigh was a fantastic actress but not in this film. She has a thankless role as Wanda but she plays it dreadfully. In many cases, she fails to even deliver lines in a convincing fashion, which shocked me. She was excellent in "Fire Over England" which she and Olivier made shortly beforehand so I don't know what happened here. Leslie Banks is good as the morally dubious Keith - well, the more morally dubious Keith - but the best supporting performance comes from Hay Petrie as the unfortunate Evan. It also features nice small appearances from Robert Newton and William Dewhurst (who died over two years before the film was released). Banks and Newton likewise appeared in "Fire Over England" and Olivier later cast them in his version of "Henry V", incidentally.

Overall, this is a very bad film which does not make a great deal of sense if you think about it but Olivier saves it from being a complete disaster. Still, it is one of my least favourite films of the year.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very interesting study of men's characters.
planktonrules31 December 2012
he film begins with two happy lovers (Laurence Olivier and Vivian Leigh) returning to her home. There, waiting for her is her husband--a man who she hasn't seen in three years. He demands money and then attacks Olivier--trying to stab him. In self-defense, Olivier kills the husband and dumps his body in an alley. He then visits his brother, a respected judge (Leslie Banks) and confesses. However, the brother surprisingly does NOT want him to go the police--which is odd, since it was a case of self-defense. It seems that he doesn't want this dirty laundry to be aired in public. For a time, things appear fine...until some other guy is arrested for the killing. Olivier cannot allow this to happen but his brother encourages him to be quiet--the defendant is sure to be found innocent. But, as the trial progresses, things look worse and worse for the defendant. And, all the while his brother, a respected judge, encourages the couple to leave the country and forget about the case. The problem is that Olivier's character has character--much more than his supposedly upright and respectable brother.

While the story is very simple and relatively easy to predict (though the ending was a bit of a twist), I liked the idea of two brothers who appear one way but are the opposite. Olivier's character is a bit of a rotter--gambling and living a rather frivolous life--but down deep, he has a conscience. His proper brother, however, is truly evil and can live with an innocent man being convicted and hung! Because it is a very good film, it is perplexing why Gainsborough Pictures shelved this movie for three years before finally releasing it. I'd love to know why.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enormous curiosity value in this....
wisewebwoman30 December 2003
But not much plot. This was obviously a vehicle for its stars who were married at the time. Lawrence Olivier is quite wooden and stagey, Vivien glows, the camera just loves her. The story is a neat twist on ethics and morality with the wayward no-good brother standing firm for honesty and the uptight, successful barrister brother - on his way to becoming a judge - ready to hang an innocent man for a crime he did not commit. The twenty one days refer to the length of time the trial of this innocent man is going to take. The technical quality of the film was poor, the background of London was nearly washed out and the streets were obviously studio sets, not surprising, as it was filmed at the start of WW2. 5 out of 10, the ending was a bit of a let down and Larry really hams it up.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Excellent short story but a long dragged out film.
1930s_Time_Machine28 November 2023
You'll get hooked on this right away but then annoyed at the way it takes so long to get to the point. Director, Basil Dean's lugubrious pace and humourless direction tries too hard to build tension rather than developing the story or making us get to know his cast.

According to Mr Dean he was not entirely to blame. Studio boss Alexander Korda was so underwhelmed by Dean's direction that he started to re-shoot and rewrite scenes himself. This conflict gives the picture a disjointed feel but the main issue is that the balance is really wrong. About half the film is taken up by the (anti) climatic court case which is meant to get you on the edge of your seat. It achieves that ambition but only because you're yelling "get on with it!" This is one of the dullest court room scenes I've seen - where is William Powell or a Barrymore brother when you need them ? What's sacrificed for this pseudo-arty tension trope is that we don't get time to know the characters straight away. More time should have been devoted to that because it takes too long to draw you in.

On the plus side, it looks good, it's full of mood, clever lighting and the inevitable 1930s London fog - the camerawork also is pretty impressive. The acting, as you'd expect from this lot is first rate but it's the story which doesn't grab you. Such a tale about abuse, murder, deception and blackmail handled by another director could have been the most exciting thing since sliced bread but this is actually less exciting than that aforementioned piece of bread.

What does eventually makes you sit up and take notice is the brilliant cameo from Hay Petrie as a down and out ex-vicar. You then wish you'd been paying more attention earlier! That's what happens with this - once you've started you really want to find out what happens next but your brain keeps trying to switch off.

Despite what some reviewers have said, this is not a bad film - it's just frustrating because you know that it could have been made better. For example, had Hitchcock been in the chair this might have been a classic. As it stands it's just ok.

One interesting thing to see is Mr Olivier not playing the alpha male - as the weak willed looser, the unsuccessful brother, he's remarkably believable. That's until you realise that this young actor has, just a few weeks earlier married probably the most beautiful woman in the world.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
21 Days
Prismark1014 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Made in 1937 but having it released held back for several years.

It would be hard to discern from this movie. The male lead Laurence Olivier would be regarded as one of the greatest actors on stage and a ten time Oscar nominee for acting. That the female lead Vivien Leigh will be a two time Oscar winner.

It goes to show in Olivier's case just how much he bucked up his screen acting skills. By 1939 he was in Hollywood making Wuthering Heights.

In 21 Days, Olivier plays Larry, a roguish brother of a barrister Keith Durrant (Leslie Banks) who is about to be appointed as a judge.

Larry has been involved with his lover Wanda (Vivien Leigh.) However her estranged husband Henry shows up demanding money and Larry accidentally kills him in self defence after a struggle.

Larry stows Henry's dead body an abandoned archway at night. The police arrest a former priest who has fallen on hard times who is sent to trial for murder.

When Keith is consulted by his brother, he tells Larry to keep quiet and leave the country.

The guilt of an innocent man taking the fall for him is too much to bear for Larry. He plans to spend 21 idyllic days with Wanda and then hand himself in.

21 Days is a fairly incoherent story. A part of the last segment is spent with Larry and Wanda in a fairground. The acting is somewhat weak as is the production standards. The cop out ending makes me question just how it managed to get past the Hays code in the USA.

It is better seen as a curiosity and the development of two of its stars in the early days of their screen careers.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb Suspense Thriller, But Beware of Spoilers
zardoz-1310 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
In the tragic romantic suspense thriller "21 Days Together," co-stars Laurence Olivier and Vivien Leigh are a young couple who get away with a crime that the authorities treat as murder after a self-confessed suspect eagerly takes credit for the offense. Adapting the classic John Galsworthy short play "The First and the Last," "Constant Nymph" director Basil Dean and noted novelist Graham Greene have generated a gripping, top-notch, nail-biter that could only have been produced in the United Kingdom owing to the moral improprieties of the film. At the very least, under Hollywood's insurmountable Production Code Administration, this starry-eyed couple would have faced manslaughter charges, and the man who claimed that he committed the transgression would never have received a death sentence. Indeed, "21 Days Together" boasts three major twists, so if you haven't seen this tantalizing tale, prepare yourself for something entirely different. Moreover, cease from reading this analysis now! The forthcoming revelations in the second paragraph will sabotage the suspense if you blunder ahead. Olivier and Leigh make a charismatic couple that you will have you shedding a tempest of tears until fade-out. Leslie Banks delivers a strong performance as Olivier's smarter brother who not only takes their best interests but also his selfish interests to heart. While they might not have known better in the heat of the incident, he has no excuse for his incorrigible actions to shield them from exposure.

Neither Larry Durrant (Laurence Olivier of "Wuthering Heights") nor Wanda (Vivien Leigh of "Gentlemen's Agreement") are ever questioned about the murder of a sleazy individual who tries to blackmail them. Actually, this foreign dastard had married our heroine some years before when Wanda was starving on the streets of Paris and would have consented to anything. According to Wanda, their marriage lasted barely a week. Nevertheless, Henry Wallen (Esme Percy of "Pygmalion") awaits them as they return to Wanda's London flat, and they refused to capitulate to Wallen's blackmail demands. A violent hand-to-hand struggle with Larry and Wallen ensues after the latter brandishes a knife. Wanda doesn't stand by idly but participates at some point in the brawl. During the commotion, Wallen falls and fatally smashes his head on the bricks of a fireplace. Fearing the worst for their future, Larry and Wanda decide to dispose of the corpse without informing the law. Stealthily, Larry places the corpse inconspicuously in Glove Lane in an empty archway when nobody is present. Immediately, the remorseful Larry visits his older, wiser brother, Keith (Leslie Banks of "The Most Dangerous Game"), and explains his hopeless predicament. Keith is a prominent barrister, and his name has been touted in the press as the ideal candidate for a judgeship. He realizes only too well what may happen to his own prestige if his brother is arrested and put on trial. Comparably, Larry is the black sheep of the Durrant clan, and everything that he tries his hand at ends horribly in disaster. Not only should Larry book passage on a ship and leave the country, but Keith also urges him to never see Wanda again! Predictably, the forlorn Larry can do neither.

Later, Larry encounters a former clergyman, John Aloysius Evan (Hay Petrie of "The Red Shoes"), outside of a pawn shop. The woebegone clergyman has been reduced to the ignominy of begging, but he doesn't plead for money from Larry. Instead, Evan is in search for self-respect. The only way to attain a state of such nirvana, he claims with vigor is to suffer presumably as Christ suffered. Larry tells him about his unfortunate accident with Wallen. When the authorities conduct their investigation, they encounter Evan, and former cleric confesses to the crime. Furthermore, Evan has the incriminating gloves that Larry wore during the fight. As it turns out, Larry dropped these gloves after he chatted with Evan and then walked away from him. Mind you, Dean and Greene pull a fast one at the last moment to exonerate our hero and heroine. The clergyman is convicted of the murder, but Larry's conscience refuses to let him rest until he clears poor Evan. Evan dies on the way to his hanging, and Larry and Wanda are allowed to live happily ever after. It isn't so much that they get away with a crime, which they should have come forth and reported to the authorities, but Larry's shrewd brother Keith is as guilty as they are. Now, Keith finds himself in the limelight because he is poised to be elevated to a high spot in British jurisprudence. Keith goes out onto a limb to help his wayward brother and Wanda. The Production Code would have demanded punishment for Keith's incorrigible behavior as well as that of Larry and Wanda. Just as our protagonists should have admitted their roles in the death of the blackmailer, Keith should have notified the authorities without hesitation about his brother's misfortune. Meanwhile, Keith volunteers to help with the clergyman's defense, and he advises Evan's attorney, Tolley (Robert Newton of "Treasure Island") on ways to ensure that his client doesn't receive a death sentence. Again, the determined clergyman derails the best efforts of his defense team.

"21 Days Together" draws its title from the number days between Evan's arrest until his conviction. Keith does his level best to separate Larry and Wanda. Eventually, he realizes that these two are inextricably bound together by fate. Our hero and heroine celebrate as if their lives are destined to end after those 21 days. The guilty and grief-stricken Larry knows deep in his soul he cannot flee and let another man pay for his sins with his life. The last minute reversal is devastating and reflects how Hollywood and the British Film industry differed in their depiction of morality. "21 Days Together" is a memorable movie. Clearly, the subject matter alarmed producer Alexander Korda, and he shelved the film for two years before he released it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible sound, even worse subtitles, but worth watching for Olivier/Leigh fans Warning: Spoilers
Another reviewer complains about the poor sound. I've just watched it on TalkingPics - there were subtitles on my TV, but they were wrong at a crucial point. According to the subtitles, the Scottish landlady exclaims, 'That murderer has escaped the hangman. He's back on the way to jail.' I looked up the film on Wikipedia, and discovered that the so-called murderer had in fact had a heart attack on the way back to jail. I returned to the film, and turned the volume up as far as it could go, and realised that the landlady had actually said 'He's died on the way back to jail.' Laurence Olivier should have done the decent thing, and gone to the police straight away. Then he would have been convicted of manslaughter. He should have ignored his brother, who seemed to think that Olivier's appearance in court would put his advancement to a judgeship in a bad light. Stupid.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
21 Days Together: When A Murderer Takes a Holiday
Reel_Reviews9 July 2019
In 21 Days (1940, aka 21 Days Together) directed by Basil Dean, Larry Darrent (Laurence Oliver) accidentally kills his lover's (Wanda, played by Vivian Leigh) husband. Larry, talking to a man outside a pub of sorts, unwittingly drops the gloves from his pocket. After Larry leaves the man pick up the gloves. Because of the gloves, the man is arrested and his trial is set to take place in 21 days, hence the title.

Larry and Wanda have the time of their lives while this poor guy is on trial for his life. If found guilty the man will be executed.

The story dragged a bit for me and I couldn't get into the main character, Larry. I'm not sure if it was this particular movie but Laurence Oliver did nothing for me as an actor. This is not to say I won't give him another shot in another movie. As for Vivian Leigh, well, she was just there.

When Larry and Wanda are at an amusement park, they would show the man on trial, switching back and forth to show, I feel, how one can forget another's life hangs in the balance for something they didn't do. I like how they did this and find it quite advanced for a film of its time. It took me almost three nights to watch it for when I would start I got bored and turned it off.

I'm not sure if I would recommend this film to anyone. Usually, if I don't care for a movie I would either recommend it or won't recommend it. I'm going to leave this as is and leave it up to you, the viewer, to decide if you want to see it or not.

21 Days is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Crap Suzette
writers_reign28 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Hard - make that impossible - to believe that Graham Greene took a screenplay credit on this piece of cheese instead of selling everything he owned to buy his way out of it. Even Robert Newton can't save it (though presumably some bonding went on because both Newton and Leslie Banks later appeared in Oliviers' Henry V). The only word for this is dire - at least the only word that won't be censored and I doubt if anyone concerned would want to display it on their CV. Released in 1940 to cash in on Gone With The Wind it was actually shot in 1937 and feels like n end-of-term production at a third-rate Drama school.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed