New York Town (1941) Poster

(1941)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Slight social drama that needed a script for real comedy
SimonJack11 June 2021
What "New York Town" needed was a screenplay with some witty, snappy and funny dialog. The plot for this film would be okay, with a screenplay to give it some life. As is, though, it's little more than a story about a couple of guys sharing an apartment as they scrape by in New York City, and then inviting a lonely single gal without work to share their place. Along with these are some other regular street folks - one a WW I war veteran with no legs who gets around on a platform with rollers and who peddles pencils. Lynn Overman does a good job as Sam in that role. Movie buffs will remember seeing Eddie Murphy faking it as a handicapped veteran on such a device in "Trading Places" of 1983.

But there's so little that's funny in this film, and the mild romance is long in blooming, so that it's just a slow go-nowhere film. Paramount might better have put more into it as a social drama - or spice it up with some real comedy. I know - Preston Sturges was supposed to have worked on it in some capacity and is an uncredited writer. But, still there's little of note in the screenplay. This film is surprising in that the studio may have been hoping or thinking of something else. Why else would it take 10 months to hit theaters after filming concluded?

It could be that the studio had reservations about releasing it at all - mainly because MacMurray by then had made some very good films, including comedies, and this one was well beneath his other films. And, Mary Martin was already known from films and Broadway; and the supporting cast of Akim Tamiroff, Eric Blore, Lynne Overman, Cecil Kellaway and some others had all been in some very fine comedies before this.

It's too bad that Paramount didn't rethink the film and turn it over to Sturges and/or some other writers to put some zippy comedy into the dialog.

Here are samples of what passes for comedy in this film.

Sam, "I start out this morning with a gross of pencils. I've got 12 dozen left. I'm holdin' me own. Whadda they want for 10 cents - typewriters?"

Victor Ballard (Fred MacMurray), "He's got a very suspicious face. Reminds me of the guy in the paper that killed his wife with an ax."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A sad disappointment
malcolmgsw18 December 2007
Given that Preston Sturges was an uncredited writer and director on this film it has to be said that this film is a great disappointment.Clearly given the cast Paramount must have been looking on this film as one of their A pictures.The story is rather threadbare and the whole sorry mess rarely if ever manages to raise a laugh.Most books seem to show this film as running 94 minutes but the copy i viewed thankfully only ran 78 minutes.I doubt that the missing 16 minutes would have made any difference.The fact that so few people seem to have voted for this makes me feel that its poor reputation must preceed it.Funny how ill served was Mary Martin by the film vehicles that she chose to star in.A great talent wasted by the cinema.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
They did! They did! But perhaps they shouldn't have!
mark.waltz21 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
25 years before coming together on Broadway for the hit two person musical "I Do! I Do!", Mary Martin and Robert Preston were teamed for this depressing bit of reality that had Preston Sturges uncredited for part of the script. Perhaps it is best that this isn't among his mainline credits, because it is a deservedly overlooked and forgotten drama (that is billed as a comedy!) that only gives the musical legend Martin one chance to sing. The leading man is actually Fred MacMurray, a down on his luck street photographer in New York who snaps pictures of passerby's on Fifth Avenue and expects to be paid for them. Along the way, he meets the struggling Martin who is staying with the hard drinking Akim Tamiroff and trying to find work, applying for a job with the wealthy Preston (billed third over the credits, but not appearing until 45 minutes into the film) and ending up in a romance with him while MacMurray fumes over potentially losing the girl he loves. There have been screwball comedies about friendships between men and women of the working class growing while the girl finds romance in high society, not realizing that the man she really should love has been her best buddy all along. That plot line was best utilized in the Carole Lombard/Fred MacMurray screwball comedy "Hands Across the Table", so it is ironic to see MacMurray in the same situation only a few years later, yet in a version that is a pale imitation of what he had already done.

Some of the attempts at comedy will make you ask, "Huh?", particularly a rivalry between Preston's butler (Eric Blore) and Preston's dachshund (leading to a rather eye rolling attempt at a gag in the finale). The one song, sung by Martin with the participation of MacMurray and Tamiroff, is one of the few high points, but it is an innocuous song that just seems thrown in for no real reason other than to give Mary a chance to sing. The opening sequence shows Manhattan at its most depressing, with a girl brought to the hospital after attempting suicide, leaving a note that she was lonely, which gives the nurse the opportunity to snark, "8 million people in this town, and she's lonely". It is out of place completely, although the continued presence of a legless man rolling himself down the street on a wheeled board does add some continuity to that bit of opening depression. The available print is much shorter than the release print, so some actors I was looking for in bit parts (Charles Lane for one) seem to have been edited out on the TV studio cutting room floor. I'd been looking for this film ever since I read Mary Martin's autobiography back in high school, and I can see why she dismissed it as one forgettable film. The attempts to turn the magnetic Mary into another Claudette Colbert fail miserably so I can see why she eventually decided that Broadway was where it was at. In Hollywood, she certainly was no Venus, and that definitely was not her fault.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed