The Penalty (1941) Poster

(1941)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Life on the run is no life for a kid.
OldHatCinema27 May 2020
The cast is pretty top-notch for its time, with two great character actors, Edward Arnold and Lionel Barrymore. Gene Reynolds, as Arnold's smart aleck son, gives a fine performance too. As expected, Lionel steals every scene he's in, and this is one of several films disproving the widely reported myth that Lionel was confined to a wheelchair and never filmed standing again after 1938.

The supporting cast, including Robert Sterling, Marsha Hunt, and a nasty goose named Charlie, all have their moments, but the success of the film hinges on the talents of Reynolds, Arnold and Barrymore.

The climactic scene in which Barrymore and Arnold face off is pretty neat, given the caliber of these two old pros.

The film remains engaging and enjoyable throughout, and the occasional lapses into sentimentality and corniness are easily forgivable. Though not one of the "great" films of the era by any stretch, and more of a B-picture overall, it's still a good, little-known '40's gem.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I'm just now noticing Reynolds
brackenhe10 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a big fan of old movies (keep my TV tuned to TCM mostly) and I've been noticing Gene Reynolds a lot more lately. I'm sure I've been aware of him in the past because looking at his credits I've seen several of his films as a child star. Why he's not better known for this is a wonder to me.

Slightly Spoilerish Plot Points below.

I watched The Penalty this morning and he was just great in this film. It's a slight little film (less than 90 minutes) but it was long enough for him to make a transition from a tough gangster's kid to a responsible ward of a good farmer. He conveys emotions well. He's just as good as Freddy Bartholomew or Mickey Rooney, who I supposed were the biggest male child stars of the late 30's and early 40's. In fact he's more subtle than Rooney, whom I admire.

The rest of cast is good too including Edward Arnold as the father, Robert Sterling as his guardian, and Marsha Hunt & Lionel Barrymore as neighbors who help Sterling turn the boy around.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"That's the stuff!"
utgard1413 April 2020
Slick B picture from MGM starring two of the all-time greats, Edward Arnold and Lionel Barrymore. Arnold plays the humorously named criminal Stuff Nelson, who has an even more humorously named son, Roosty (Gene Nelson). After he's captured, Roosty is sent to work on a farm. Eventually Stuff comes looking for his stuff and the boy must choose between a life of crime or a life on the farm.

Barrymore and Arnold are top notch as anyone familiar with their work might expect. Sadly Barrymore isn't in this as much as I would have liked. I would have preferred he run the farm instead of Robert Sterling, but I suppose that would have changed the ending some. Gene Nelson does fine with the part he's given, which is pretty corny. Richard Lane takes a break from harassing Boston Blackie to play the investigator hot on Arnold's trail. Marsha Hunt has a thankless role as Sterling's girlfriend. Features one of the cleverest bank robberies ever filmed. I'm not saying I would ever rob a bank but if I did this is how I would want to do it. One final thing, I love the movie poster. Talk about a lost art form.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This film belongs to Gene Reynolds!!
SkippyDevereaux28 February 2001
A very good film, with actors ranging from Lionel Barrymore to Edward Arnold, but this film really hinges on the acting ability of Gene Reynolds. Mr. Reynolds dominates this film and for a teen actor, he carries the film very well. I found this film to be very good and really kept this viewer's attention from beginning to end. Be sure and catch this film the next time it is on television--another "small" film that is worth seeing!!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Gene Reynolds shines in crime drama programmer...
Doylenf10 April 2007
But all his acting abilities are given short shrift by a tale that purports to be a crime melodrama with EDWARD ARNOLD as his father, a bank robber who's always one step ahead of the police. RICHARD LANE is the detective on his trail, VEDA ANN BORG is Arnold's moll girlfriend, GENE REYNOLDS is his street smart son, and RALPH BYRD is an unfortunate police officer.

Trouble is, none of the story rings true. It all his a very fabricated MGM look, the kind of programmer they turned out to fill a double feature program without any headliners in starring roles. I never bought jovial EDWARD ARNOLD as the criminal type and this bit of miscasting prevents the story from any real sense of credibility.

It's a good forty minutes before ROBERT STERLING and MARSHA HUNT show up as a farm couple willing to take reform school reject GENE REYNOLDS under their wing. He's a fallen sparrow who needs all the nurturing they can give.

Fifty minutes into the story, LIONEL BARRYMORE and GLORIA DE HAVEN show up, with Barrymore as a Grandpa who smokes a pipe and talks like Dr. Gillespie except that he's full of kindly sentiments instead of bitter complaints about mankind.

Did I say the story was dated? Marsha Hunt talks about a schoolteacher making $85 a month.

Summing up: Unpredictable at the start, the story soon turns into a conventional "crime doesn't pay" drama with Reynolds doing a complete reformation in time for a happy ending. The only saving grace is that it's not as preachy as it might have been.

Summing up: The faults far outweigh the virtues.

Trivia note: Watch for PHIL SILVERS (without specs) in a one minute bit as a hobo.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly good.
planktonrules29 July 2013
When this film begins, the audience is taken for a real ride. The usually nice Edward Arnold turns out to be playing an amazingly cold and heartless guy. Surprisingly, this evil crook turns out to have a son (Gene Reynolds)--a teenager who idolizes him. So, even when Dad robs banks and kills people, the boy STILL thinks his father is great. When the boy is captured by the police, the kid naturally turns out to be incorrigible and gets himself thrown out of reform school. In an odd twist, however, instead of sending him to a worse facility, they parole him to a farmer (Robert Sterling). What the kid doesn't know is that the authorities expect the father to try to come back for him eventually--and then they'll spring the trap. But in the meantime, the boy is stuck on the place for some time--weeks or months. And in the process, for the first time, the boy ends up making connections with folks other than his Dad. What's next? See the film.

While the plot is a bit moralistic and predictable at times, this still is a dandy movie mostly because of the great dialog and acting. Arnold is great as a Dillinger-type crook but the supporting actors and the writing really make the picture. Reynolds is great--mostly because he has some of the snappiest and most sarcastic comments I've ever heard from a kid! And, Lionel Barrymore, though he's only in the movie a bit, is terrific. The bottom line is that this film, though pretty much a B-movie, has the full MGM treatment--and is a fine and enjoyable picture throughout.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An excellent cast in a fine movie
Handlinghandel16 October 2007
"The Penalty" is really about the character played by Gene Reynolds. It's a role similar to the one he had in "The Get-Away," another excellent film. He was a fascinating, intense young actor. He was sort of a teen-aged John Garfield. (I understand that the actor went on to win numerous Emmys producing for television. That's fine. Who knows how he would have matured and what sort of roles, if any, he would have got had he remained with acting.) The movie begins with the fine Edward Arnold in his usual genial manner. He is hiring men for a job, assuring them in a fatherly manner that they'll be paid well. But quickly we see that they are being hired as his stooges for a bank robbery. And that he yes, is fatherly: He is the father of the Reynolds character, who worships him.

Arnold plays one bitter, nasty guy. And he's teaching his son to be as cold and cynical as he is. His girl friend, played by the entertaining Veda Ann Borg, may not worship him. But she worships the furs and other finery his ill-gotten money buys her.

The bulk of "The Penalty" takes place on a farm where Reynolds is sent while dad is on the lam. No more about the plot other than to mention the people in this new home: Robert Sterling is excellent as the farmer. Marsha Hunt is appealing as his lady friend, the local schoolteacher. Lionel Barrymore is her father. As he often did, he plays variations on his standard persona: When he's talking about young Reynolds or young Sterling, he could as easily be speaking of young Dr. Kildaire.

The movie has a little of everything: It's exciting and suspenseful. It's funny at times. And it's sad. I recommend it very highly.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"The Penalty" - Wake Up & Watch This 1941 Sleeper
xtine92610 April 2012
When selecting old movies to record, the number of stars listed by the cable company often has a bearing on these choices. However, even though "The Penalty" was showing only two stars, the entire film belies this underestimated rating.

Beyond the natural ambiance of a black-and-white flick from 1941, this movie unfolds gradually, and culminates with a somewhat riveting climax, so it's certainly worth more than a mere two stars.

Edward Arnold, an often overlooked actor from film's early days, portrays a superb sampling of the ultimate bad guy. The one aspect of his character that makes him human is his relationship with his teenage son, a role brilliantly played by Gene Reynolds.

Add a dash of Lionel Barrymore as a crusty old farmer, and a smattering of sizzling young Robert Sterling, and you have created the recipe for a delicious old flick that will hold your attention and dangle in your thoughts like the aftertaste of a delectable dessert.

This film is definitely worth the investment of 80 minutes of viewing time.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dramatic irony as things come full circle
jarrodmcdonald-110 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of MGM's lesser known "family" films from the early 1940s. It's based on an unsuccessful Broadway play that closed after a week, but the basic idea was reworked so that we get the usual "crime does not pay" studio programmer. Though not a spectacular production, it contains smooth performances from its two top-billed character actors, Edward Arnold and Lionel Barrymore. And there is also a good turn by juvenile player Gene Reynolds.

As I watched THE PENALTY, it seemed obvious to me that Metro wanted something reminiscent of Warner Brothers' Dead End Kids product. They did not put someone like Mickey Rooney into it, since it had to be someone like Reynolds who could play "bad," about as opposite of Andy Hardy as possible. We are meant to root for Reynolds the troubled teen, but only after he's shown character growth and started to change.

In the beginning of the story Reynolds is a morally challenged adolescent, the son of a vicious robber and cop killer (Arnold). He remains loyal to his dad, alongside dad's voluptuous moll (Veda Ann Borg), even though he knows the old man does horrible things to get ahead. There's an interesting scene where Arnold explains his racket as a business, which Reynolds accepts no questions asked.

It is not until a shoot-out occurs at a cabin where Arnold blasts more cops, as well as the senseless murder of an innocent taxi cab driver, that Reynolds begins to see this destructive and violent lifestyle from another angle. Also, he has to deal with Borg dying during the ensuing gunfire. Miss Borg does a splendid job expressing her character's final moments, mistakenly believing something she did is what led the coppers to their hideout.

There is no time to grieve Borg's death since the cops are closing in and it looks like Arnold may have to surrender. In the next part, Reynolds still the obedient son, helps get his father out through the back of the cabin and into a waiting car. They race off, narrowly avoiding a spray of bullets.

This leads to a poignant farewell under a bridge, where Reynolds drops his injured pop. Arnold is going to take his chances and hide here. While Reynolds speeds off and leads the police on a wild goose chase.

A short time later Reynolds is caught and sent to reform school. When that doesn't curb his misbehavior, a judge (Grant Mitchell) ships him to a rural community for rehabilitation. The second half of the movie details his new life on an Indiana farm run by a young man (Robert Sterling) and his mother (Emma Dunn).

Well-meaning neighbors include a local teacher (Marsha Hunt), her kid sister (Gloria DeHaven) and their irascible grandfather (Barrymore).

There are humorous bits involving a mean old gander that likes to attack Reynolds on the derriere when he's bending over in the cornfield. Also, Mr. Barrymore has some amusing lines meant to portray an elderly rural coot as both exaggerative and logical. He is not exactly Dr. Gillespie here.

Reynolds' rehab is overshadowed by the unknown whereabouts of his father, since Arnold is still at large and not dead. Later, Sterling gets a call from the feds who inform him that Arnold was spotted and is probably heading to Indiana to pick up Reynolds.

The last sequence features Arnold's dramatic arrival at the farm using an alias. He attempts to take Reynolds away with him. Sterling and Dunn try to reason with him that he should let the boy stay, where there is a future for him. Going on the lam will only lead to the boy's death. But Arnold doesn't agree. His son is leaving with him right now.

In the next scene Barrymore enters the house with a gun. He knows all about Arnold's type, and he is not going to let this two-bit gangster ruin Reynolds' chance of happiness and a normal life. A standoff occurs.

Barrymore tries to shoot Arnold but misses. Arnold, with a weapon of his own, fires back and Barrymore falls to the floor and drops his gun. Reynolds picks it up. Earlier in the movie, we had seen Arnold teach Reynolds how to use a firearm. And how to not let anyone get close to him. Dramatic irony, as things come full circle.

Since this is a studio entry bound by the production code, with emphasis on how a boy from a troubled background can go straight, Reynolds is not able to shoot and kill his father. Arnold seeing how his boy has changed, gives up and scrams. Off-camera Arnold has exited the farmhouse and run into a police ambush. We hear him die.

In the end we are left with a sobering realization on what it takes for a kid and his community to live a peaceful life. Part of that requires standing up to evil and facing down danger. Shades of the impending war with Europe. This was not meant to be a film that won Oscars, just a film that was made to help its intended audience think more clearly about the sanctity of human life. And for that reason, we should watch THE PENALTY and remember its lessons.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed