Repent at Leisure (1941) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
nice light B movie
blanche-21 July 2015
Wendy Barrie and Kent Taylor star in "Repent at Leisure" from 1941.

Barrie plays Emily Baldwin, the daughter of a department store magnet who is about to marry a prince and runs out on him. She hops on a bus and meets a man, Richard Hughes (Kent Taylor) who gives her a dime for the bus. Naturally he's curious as to what she's doing in a wedding gown. She tells him she was a model at a store and quit abruptly.

She is interested in meeting a different kind of man from what she has in the past, and he's it; they also have similar goals. She has nowhere to go so he offers her a separate part of his apartment.

It turns out he works at her father's department store - she doesn't mention it's owned by her family - and the next day, all the single men are fired. They have to cut employees and they don't want children to suffer. Try pulling something like that today.

Richard says he's married and has been for the past year. His boss then invites Richard and his wife over to play bridge.

Emily offers to be his wife for the evening. They not only wind up getting married for real, but they go to a foundling home and adopt a beautiful baby boy. All goes well for a while.

This is a good film with a nice performance by Wendy Barrie and the rest of the cast. Charles Lane, who died at 102 in 2007, is Richard's curmudgeon boss and gives his usual nasty performance; and George Barbier is Emily's kind and helpful father.

Enjoyable.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Familiar supporting cast are the best thing about this film
SimonJack11 March 2020
"Repent at Leisure" is a light comedy romance and drama with a supporting cast that's probably better known by most movie mavens than the leads And George Barbier, Thurston Hall and Charles Lane give better performances as R.C. Baldwin, Jay Buckingham and Clarence Morgan.

Kent Taylor and Wendy Barrie aren't bad, but their roles are much less natural than those of the three mature and accomplished actors. Taylor's Richard Hughes is probably meant to seem standoffish, but he comes across as wooden at times. And, there's little to no spark between the two who are supposed to be in love.

The plot is simple and the story is okay. The addition of a baby gives some depth to an otherwise bland story, but that still can't elevate this story much above average. Five stars are generous, but the supporting cast deserve that much. Only the most stalwart of old film buffs would likely be able to stay with this film.

The script doesn't have much memorable in it. Here are the two best lines in the film. Emily, "For two cents, I'd marry a truck driver." J.C. Baldwin, 'And I'd much rather see you give up this heel-clicker now than I would see your heart broken with a divorce at the end of the year."
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wendy Barrie (barely) carries this one
ksf-26 June 2019
At only 66 minutes, we knew this wasn't going to be a major work from RKO. Wendy Barrie stars as "Emily", about to be married to the Prince of something or other. But she's not happy, and laments that she doesn't really want to marry him anyway. She bumps into "Richard" (Kent Taylor), and they hit it off. Just one problem: Richard works in her own father's store ! Wendy Barrie starred in a bunch of the "Falcon" films as well as the "Saint" films. Kent Taylor did okay in hollywood, but looks like he never made the bigtime. and of course, Charles Lane is "Morgan", the manager; Lane played a HUGE number of bit parts over his LONG career, usually serious, somber roles, (bill collectors) who had to rain on someone's parade. So when the story has them telling lie after lie to Morgan to save their jobs, they get in deeper and deeper. It's all pretty silly. If you're old enough to know Three's Company, this is where Mr. Roper walks in and it all blows up! as usual, they could have avoided the whole thing if they had just told the truth. We rush through the whole story... it's okay, as a B movie. all over and done with pretty quickly. hard to buy into it all, since it's all built on un-necessary lies and mis-understandings. we were way into the hollywood film code by now, but a smidge prior to entering WWII. shows on Turner Classics. meh.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Getting married is like working in a department store. You have to know your goods.
mark.waltz24 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
While this certainly is a preposterous example of how ridiculous some screwball comedy plots can be, what is amazing about it is how entertaining and fast-moving it is. To save his job as a department store clerk, Kent Taylor arranges to become married to Wendy Barrie whom he is unaware is the daughter of the department store owner, George Barbier. Everybody in the store knows except Taylor and when the truth explodes, the deception threatens to ruin the marriage, and even worse, take away the baby that they adopted and got custody of for a year.

A charming cast and fluffy screenplay helps this move along with Barrie and Taylor an enchanting couple and Barbier a delightful old rascal from the "Charles Coburn School of Rascalism". Charles Lane as Taylor's condescending boss and Cecil Cunningham as Lane's imperious wife are very funny, with Lane getting more footage than he normally gets in a movie as he tries to discredit Taylor every chance he gets. Thurston Hall is also very funny as a rival department store owner, spoofing the Macy's/Gimbles feud. Similarities to the cult British comedy TV series "Are You Being Served?" are obvious.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly Good
Handlinghandel19 November 2005
This is a variation on the runaway bride plot. Wendy Barrie, generally not a favorite of mine, is likable as said lady. She runs out on her would-be groom as the movie is opening. Her goal is to meet a man not interested in her department store-owner father's money. Enter Kent Taylor.

Taylor is rather wooden. But his character is meant to be stolid, though honorable. They make a cute couple, through ups and downs.

The supporting cast is uniformly good. And the plot doesn't seem forced. It has plenty of variations on the standard theme and is a nice way to pass some time.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Silly but fun
JohnSeal20 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Repent At Leisure would have made a great half hour situation comedy, but as television was still in its infancy it got to be an RKO 'B' feature instead. Kent Taylor and Wendy Barrie make for a good pair of leads in this silly tale of concealed identities set in a big New York department store. Also notable is George Barbier as the kindly mogul who runs the store in competition with his rival Buckingham (Thurston Hall). Though the film's final act descends into complete absurdity as Taylor and Barrie rescue their adopted child from a careless and stereotypical African-American handyman (Fred 'Snowflake' Toones), the first forty minutes or so are quite enjoyable and you could certainly do worse things with a spare 67 minutes.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-Done Fluff
mgconlan-121 November 2005
Thanks largely to the insouciant script by Jerome Cady, the well-done comic direction by Frank Woodruff (who'd scored at the same studio a year before with the similarly themed "Cross-Country Romance") and the charm of Wendy Barrie in the female lead, this is a better-than-average "B" with some genuinely imaginative moments. It's basically an "It Happened One Night" knockoff, but with variations that give it a unique appeal. Kent Taylor's queeny performance as the young store clerk obsessed with "success" books (including those Harold Lloyd/Clark Kent glasses!) is a bit odd but has its own charm; George Barbier is for once subtle and genuinely moving as Barrie's father (a department-store owner who helps his daughter escape a mismatched marriage to a stuck-up fortune-hunting prince, well played by Rafael Storm), the plot has some quite unexpected twists (courtesy of writers who obviously didn't take this assignment overly seriously), and only the racist so-called "comedy" of Fred "Snowflake" Toones mars it.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Trash, just trash
75groucho28 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Melodramatic dreck involving mistaken identities. The ambitious hero (employee of a department store) marries a shopgirl, not knowing she's the boss' daughter. The hero starts rising the corporate ladder but of course the deception will be found out. When it is, the sparks fly. The prodigal son joins the competitor out of spite. The plotting for this one exists at the level of a Warner Brothers cartoon (There's even a European prince, for cryin' out loud!); it's not just that the characters are broadly drawn but that their motivations are so one-dimensional and, well, corny. The whole boy-meets-girl setup has been done better. Try "Pop Always Pays" with Leon Errol for a better comic young romance.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Repent at Leisure" Provides Some Fun, Up to a Point
glennstenb27 January 2020
"Repent at Leisure" (1941) is about as logical a title for this little 66-minute B-grade film as the sequence of events depicted in it flow from plausible logic. However, that's not to say the film isn't enjoyable, because it actually is, up to a point. And that point is the drawn-out final scene, which to me was as much without merit as it was without defensible premise. It just isn't good when the final scene leaves one heading for the exit in a disagreeable state of mind.

But the movie is light and airy and pretty much a feel-good flick in general, with the department store owner (George Barbier) and his daughter (Wendy Barrie) involved in a series of comical concealed and mistaken identity concerns. How things came to this compounding familial difficulty requires the viewer to take a few leaps of faith along the way, which is acceptable because there is some fun to be had here. Kent Taylor as the leading man chosen by Wendy really has nothing going for him in the way of charisma, and it is hard to see why we should find him appealing, let alone Wendy. It is obvious this film was very cheaply done but does pass along some enjoyable moments, but please... just don't expect too much from it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This film really doesn't make a lot of sense.
planktonrules26 January 2020
I enjoyed much of "Repent at Leisure" but also must point out that the plot really makes little sense.

When the story begins, Emily Baldwin (Wendy Barrie) is about to marry some prince who is twice her age and not a particularly nice person. Emily realizes this and runs from the wedding. She hops aboard a bus and meets Richard (Kent Taylor). They agree to meet later for dinner.

When Richard goes to work at the Baldwin Department Store, he learns that the company is having financial trouble and they are firing all the single men. When Richard talks to his supervisor about this, on the spur of the moment he tells the boss that he IS married! So, the boss tells him to bring the wife by to play bridge with him and his wife. Emily agrees to marry Richard (yes, they just met)...but the night turns out to be a disaster. And during that night, they mention that they have a baby. So, to keep up the lie, they go to the orphanage and they bring home a cute little boy.

If most of this makes no sense, it only gets worse. During the next few months, Richard is advanced quickly through the department store and he doesn't realize this is because he'd married the boss' daughter. Now you'd THINK Emily would introduce her to her parents and tell him who she really is...but she doesn't.

When Richard eventually finds out the truth, it seems everyone at Baldwin's knew who he's married...and they all knew before him. At this point, Emily does her best to make Richard feel like dirt and because of the lies, he walks off...leaving Emily. Now he's working for Baldwin's competition and doing a darned good job of it. What's to come of all this?

The actors in this one are pretty good (though Kent Taylor is a tad bland)....but the material just makes little sense. And, I am pretty sure as you read my summary you, too, are confused. Why marry a guy you just met? Why not tell him who your family is? Why have a fight and leave when up until then, you'd both been very happy together? The questions are numerous and show that the writing was just pretty sloppy.

Overall, the film has merit even though it's illogical. Watch it and just turn off your brain!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Repent at Leisure
CinemaSerf20 February 2024
Though this is hardly original, I think that maybe the fact that there's a consistent grade of B-listers taking part just about gets it over the finish line in one piece. With "Emily" (Wendy Barrie) jilting "Prince Paul" (Rafael Storm) at the altar - with the full support of her doting and wealthy father "Baldwin" (George Barbier), she bumps into the charming "Hughes" (Kent Taylor) on the top of a bus - in full wedding regalia - and the ensuing whirlwind romance results in marriage. She tells her father only to discover that he is one of his employees. Much to the chagrin of his colleagues, "Hughes" suddenly starts to move up through the department store in which he works, but he is confident it's all based on merit. He has no idea that he's the boss's son-in-law! That state of affairs cannot continue and in fit of pique, the man leaves job and marriage to work for a competitor. The battles lines are drawn as the two stores battle to out-sale each other. It's all about brollies in the end as the rather predicable outcome hoves into view. The cast put a little entertaining effort into their characters and the writing does enough to keep this moving along making an amiable watch for an hour.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed