Kid Glove Killer (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
B movie from an A director
blanche-224 December 2006
Van Heflin is a forensics man trying to solve a couple of murders in "Kid Glove Killer," a 1942 MGM film also starring Marsha Hunt and Lee Bowman. As in "The Grand Central Murder," it's Heflin's performance that puts this film across, though this time he is aided by the lovely Marsha Hunt as his assistant, whom he calls "Mitchell." Lee Bowman plays a crooked politician pretending to be a good guy, and as a result, he's eager to see an innocent man put away for murder. He also is after the aforementioned Mitchell, who is waiting around for Heflin to make a move. Hunt's role is somewhat dated (or maybe not) - she's on her way to becoming a good forensics person, but says that the job is not for a woman and she wants to get married. Evidently that will put an end to her career.

Heflin was an interesting actor who could do character roles and leads. This film was made around the time of his breakthrough role in "Johnny Eager," after which he hung up his B movie mantle and moved on to bigger things. He always brought wry humor and subtle characterizations to his roles as well as excellent timing. Lee Bowman was a mustached actor who looked like he came from the Warren William era. He's solid but not terribly exciting. Hunt brings warmth and sparkle to her role.

There was, in my opinion, a major problem with the plot having to do with Heflin testing to find particles in the hair of various suspects some time after the crime - wouldn't the particles have come out when they washed their hair? You really end up thinking no one ever took a shower.

Nice beginning for Zinnemann, who would go on to direct some big features such as "High Noon."
28 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of my favorite B-films from the '40s...nice cast...
Doylenf13 December 2006
Everything about KID GLOVE KILLER is extremely dated. And yet it's fun to watch VAN HEFLIN and MARSHA HUNT go about solving a crime using old techniques and spouting a lot of artificial dialog, 1940s style.

Both of them also smoke frequently. "Match me," becomes a standard line. A cast of standard MGM B-players keeps things going nicely as Heflin and Marsh investigate the murder of a politician, when all the time we know who the killer is--LEE BOWMAN. Bowman is one of those actors who never quite made it to big time stardom, but he's completely at home here in the role of a ruthless heel.

All of the suspense in a story of this kind lies in wondering how the killer will be caught--since he's very manipulative and very cunning. His charm makes his criminal nature very deceptive to both Bowman and Hunt.

Favorite line: "Just bury me with one of your swell hamburgers on my chest." Reply: "With onions?"

If you watch carefully, you can spot BOBBY BLAKE as a youngster listening to a car radio and AVA GARDNER as a car-hop waitress.

This one, and GRAND CENTRAL MURDER made the same year, are well worth watching and nicely directed by Fred Zinnemann who later went on to A-film assignments.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Offbeat forensic thriller offers glimpses of coming noir cycle
bmacv11 September 2002
Warning: Spoilers
The title hints at something possibly more provocative – kinkier – than what the movie is. It has one foot in the fast-paced stories of urban corruption and crime of the 1930s, the other in the more disillusioned, skeptical world of emerging film noir of the 1940s.

Instead of a crusading newspaper reporter, Kid Glove Killer gives us a forensic investigator (Van Heflin) working for the police department of a mid-sized city. Its citizens are under siege from a criminal combine that suborns public officials and operates shakedown rackets. Two high-profile political murders galvanize the populace and a prosecutor (Lee Bowman) who, in an eerie preview of talk radio, delivers slanted law-and-order rants over the air. But we soon find out that he's on the mob payroll and is actually the killer (who uses not kid gloves but car bombs).

He's also romancing Heflin's lab assistant (Marsha Hunt); Heflin's also sweet on her if he'd lift his droopy eyes from a microscope long enough to admit it. The story turns on Heflin's sifting through the evidence to exonerate an innocent man whom Bowman tries to railroad. But when the evidence starts building up, Hunt inadvertently spills the beans to the vigilant Bowman.

Kid Glove Killer stays a cut or two above the standard programmer by virtue of superior acting (Heflin never had the parts his talent deserved) and its unusual, if primitive, forensic angle. It's noteworthy that the final clue sealing Bowman's fate is predicated on the assumption that, back in 1942, men did not bother to wash their hair more often than once a week.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting little film
Bucs196011 September 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a reverse mystery.....not a who dunnit for the audience...instead how do they catch who dunnit. Lee Bowman, with his little pimp mustache, is a slick assistant to the soon to be blown to smithereens mayor and appears to be Mr. Law and Order. It is soon disclosed that he is tied up with mob boss John Litel and is out to move up the ladder regardless of who stands in his way, leaving a trail of bodies behind. Van Heflin is a forensics expert with the beautiful Marsha Hunt as his assistant and love interest (although he does not want to admit it). We get to see the early development of forensic science as Heflin performs spectagraphs,etc on evidence found at the crime scene. The vacuum cleaner test is rather amusing and you wonder if the people tested ever wash their hair! A love triangle develops among Heflin, Hunt and Bowman which does not really detract from the film......in fact it makes it more interesting as Hunt tells Bowman some inside information about evidence, not realizing that he is the killer. There is a good supporting cast and Heflin's performance is odd but interesting. Marsha Hunt is lovely and Lee Bowman, not a particularly good actor, is not bad here and come across as a real stinker. This is Fred Zinneman's first feature film, after directing short subjects and it's a pretty good start to a great career. I would recommend this film for those who like tight little thrillers.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Light Me
sol-kay6 May 2005
(Slight Spoilers) Intelligent little murder drama where were shown who the murderer is even before he murders his victim. Working for the election of Richard Daniels, Samuel S. Hinds, for mayor of Chatsburg crusading lawyer and crime-fighting, that's a laugh, radio personality Jerry Lidimer, Lee Bowman, is in the know to just what Daniels is to do to in combating crime after he gets into office. Jerry is really working for the Matty Mob who's paying him $1,000.00 a week for his services.

Having Matty's hit men knock off Mayor Daniels crime-fighting attorney general Hunter J. Turnley, by telling them wheres he's going on vacation and thus away from his police protection, Jerry is now made by the unsuspecting Mayor Daniels special prosecutor which makes him even more effective for the mob not the law-abiding people of Chatsburg who he's sworn to serve.

Mayor Daniels later gets this special delivery letter that asks him about a reference for Jerry and how he was able to pay up front $28,000.00 in cash for a $80,000.00 insurance policy. Daniels knowing that Jerry was flat broke where he started to work for him less then a year ago also knows that there's something not kosher with Jerry and tells him that he's going to announce an investigation on his finances the next day.

Panic-stricken Jerry rigs Mayor Daniels car and the next morning as the Mayor is about to start the car motor he's blown to bits. Having a perfect pasty to take the fall diner owner Eddie Wright, Eddie Quillan, Jerry is now in the clear not only to be special prosecutor but mayor as well of Chatsburg. This will give the Matty Mob the run of the city with nothing to fear from the police and the law. What Jerry didn't count on is the man in charge of police lab Gordon McKay, Van Heflin.

Getting all the evidence together Gordon and his pretty assistant Jane Mitchell, Marsha Hunt, at first exonerates the accused and bewildered Eddie Wright of Mayor Daniels murder. With Jerry desperately trying to put the frame on poor Eddie and with a little conniving, on his part, Gordon gets the goods on Jerry by getting a sample of his hair which has particles that were found at the murder scene.

The ending has Jerry who found out about Gordon's evidence against him ,from an unsuspecting Jane, have it out with Gordon, who knew he was coming to murder him, who called the police in advance and also gets Jerry pinned with a dart that he was practicing with all through the film.

Van Heflin was both valiant and funny as the somewhat peculiar lab technician Gordon McKay and his scenes with the pretty Marsha Hunt were, besides a number of fight scenes, the highlight of the movie "Kid Glove Killer".
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Prehistoric CSI
spinnicks8 May 2005
This low-budget MGM crime flick is surprisingly entertaining. The best way to enjoy it is to suspend what you know about today's film-making and settle into a more innocent time when plots—like the movies themselves—were in black and white, when characters were labeled good or bad, when dialog was crisply effective (though artificial) and when even the deadliest dramas ended with wedding bells. One thing that separates "Kid Glove Killer" from similar films of the 1930s and '40s is the fact that its protagonist, Gordon McKay (Van Heflin) is not only a cop. He's in charge of a police crime laboratory. With the aid of his assistant, Jane Mitchell (Marsha Hunt), McKay solves murders and rids the city of corruption by using a microscope, a spectrograph and other tools that—mutatis mutandis—will be used again in crime-scene-investigation stories for decades to come, up to and including the current "CSI" television series. McKay scrapes beneath fingernails, vacuums people's hair and analyzes fibers to get trace evidence that will nail the crooks. The fact that you know all along who the crooks are doesn't spoil the fun—it's that kind of movie. Embedded in the investigation is a love triangle whose outcome is so obvious that you can go for popcorn without missing a beat. The acting is above par. Van Heflin's performance is adept if unspectacular. (That same year Heflin won a best-supporting-actor Oscar for "Johnny Eager.") Lee Bowman is suavely manipulative as a power-seeker. Marsha Hunt makes what she can of a role that has her wearing a lab coat one minute and an evening gown the next. In those days, of course, it was a Hollywood cliché that a professional woman would slog away at her job only till she could junk it in favor of marriage. This movie observes the cliché, but there is a hint of feminism in the fact that Jane Mitchell—whom everyone calls simply "Mitchell"—works as a chemist, a job more often held by men. Notable among supporting players are John Litel as a crime boss and Eddie Quillan as a victimized citizen. If you look fast, you can see Ava Gardner and Robert Blake in uncredited bit parts. This was Fred Zinnemann's first feature film, and he keeps the whole thing moving to a time clock. The bare-bones production and its repeated use of the same interior sets are not major drawbacks. "Kid Glove Killer" was never intended to be pâté de foie gras. It's a ham sandwich. Pass the mustard.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Van Heflin as Quincy and Marsha Hunt as the reluctant chemist
AlsExGal21 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This film is an oddball among 1942 films in that there is absolutely nothing about WWII in it, probably filmed before the attack on Pearl Harbor.

There is a new crusading mayor in office (Samuel Hinds), but he has a double agent among his employees. Gerry Ladimer, the mayor's campaign manager, is on the take from the criminal Matty gang, telling them the mayor's every move. Because the mayor has an equally crusading DA this leads to the DA's murder. But then the mayor finds out that Gerry has made an expensive purchase, and when Gerry can't explain where he got the money the mayor says that the next day he intends to open a criminal investigation on the matter.

So Gerry plants a bomb in the mayor's car that night and he is blown to bits the next morning. Gerry thinks all of the evidence went up with the mayor and his car, plus there was a citizen hanging around outside the mayor's house the night before who is being shaken down by the mob who wants to tell the mayor himself about the crooks who are ruining his business, but he is chased away by a squad car. So Gerry, now a special prosecutor, puts all of the attention on the guy outside the mayor's house, but there is a problem.

The problem is Van Heflin as forensic scientist Gordon McKay. With the spectrograph and the microscope he simply can't rule in the chief suspect as guilty. Gerry stays close to Gordon to act like he is interested in solving this crime. He gets even closer to McKay's assistant, Jane Mitchell, who has a MS in chemistry but really wants a MRS. She turns out to be the biggest blabber mouth in law enforcement history. Gerry really does want to marry the girl, but every time they have a date she spills something about the investigation to Gerry, helping him stay in the clear.

This is actually the excellent 1938 Crime Does Not Pay Short entitled "They're Always Caught" stretched from its original spartan 20 minute running time to 74 minutes by including extra characters and a romantic triangle of sorts.

It has its humorous points too, such as that sardonic wit that Van Heflin does so well, and the fish filleting pantomime he does half way through the film is worth the price of admission. It's a pretty good B if you overlook the outrageous ending.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Debut
KuRt-3330 October 2000
The category for this movie might be 'mystery', the plot however certainly isn't. Within the first five minutes of the film you found out that Jerry is corrupt and you meet McKay, the man who'll certainly solve the crime. This makes you wonder why the movie would be interesting.

Still, like most of Hitchcock's features, it's not what the movie is about, it's what you do with the plot that makes the movie. Zinneman's first is quite good for a debut: the film is sober but effective. The relation between McKay and his female assistant Mitchell is more interesting than 95% of the working relations you normally get to see. McKay's forensic quest is quite interesting too.

Bear in mind that it's a debut and watch a very nice film.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First Feature for Fred Zinnemann
wes-connors4 May 2013
Voters elect to "clean up crime" by electing Samuel S. Hinds (as Richard Daniels) mayor of a small city. Gangsters strike back immediately by murdering his district attorney. The homicide is investigated by forensics expert Van Heflin (as Gordon McKay) and his attractive assistant Marsha Hunt (as Jane Mitchell). She provides Mr. Heflin with most of his cigarettes. A likely couple, they say "match me" instead of "got a light?" Special prosecutor and crime-busting radio show host Lee Bowman (as Gerald "Jerry" Ladimer) is also on the hunt. In a "love triangle" subplot that adds tension later on, both men are attracted to Ms. Hunt...

As a car-hop, young Ava Gardner asks if anyone wants desert. Things heat up when the mayor is also murdered. In a "best supporting actor" role, sweating restaurant owner Eddie Quillan (as Eddie Wright) is accused. We know who the real killer is and who could be the next victim. This was a good feature length debut for director Fred Zinnemann. Before the car bomb, one of the characters says, "Wouldn't it Be Nice" which has no connection to The Beach Boys' song. However, the phrases "Don't Worry Baby" and "I Get Around" fairly quickly follow. God only knows if Brian Wilson was jotting down song titles while watching.

****** Kid Glove Killer (4/17/42) Fred Zinnemann ~ Van Heflin, Marsha Hunt, Lee Bowman, Eddie Quillan
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Just bury me with one of your swell hamburgers on my chest."
utgard1413 April 2014
Van Heflin plays the head of the police crime lab who investigates the murder of a district attorney and a mayor. His assistant (Marsha Hunt) is in love with him but he doesn't show her that kind of attention. So when his friend (Lee Bowman), a special prosecutor working for the mayor, starts romancing her we get ourselves a good old-fashioned love triangle.

Heflin is terrific and has great chemistry with lovely Hunt. The killer's identity is easy to figure out. It's pretty much the most obvious suspect. But thankfully the film doesn't expect that mystery to play out too long and we're let in on his identity relatively quickly. Pretty good B movie from director Fred Zinnemann (his first film). The script is smart and the forensic angle is fresh for the time. The love triangle part of the story is weak but that sort of thing was very common back then.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent formula movie by a young Fred Zinneman
secondtake20 June 2018
Kid Gloves Killer (1942)

There might be little to recommend this movie beyond a look at Van Heflin in a constrained early role. Oh, and that the director is the noted Fred Zinneman himself. This is a crime caper formula movie, and it's enjoyable all through. For me, a highlight was the unexpected ease of the leading actress, Marsha Hunt (who is still alive at 100 years old as I write this). She is a kind of "regular girl" who everyone is meant to like, but she has a natural presence on screen that seems like should have meant something bigger. Maybe that kind of "normalness" isn't quite star material, not bigger than life. But see it for her, at least. Heflin is an acquired taste these days, but an interesting leading man a little different than the rest (he's great in "Martha Ivers" and "Act of Violence"). His role here is meant to be a really determined and incorruptable science guy in a crime lab. There is a little of that show-and-tell that happens in some detective movies of the time, but not too much to make it lag. The plot owes something to gangster films, where the big crime guy has the D.A. in his pocket. But this same man is also in love (or pretends to be) with the Hunt character. It's all in good entertainment fun, however, nothing too thrilling, and nothing too corny or cheap either. Back to Zinneman. This is his first feature film direction. The snappy, smart construction might be a sign of things to come, once he gets meatier material. Interesting!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun B-movie
aromatic-227 June 2001
In Zinneman's directorial debut, as in most of his films, the emphasis is on the interaction among human minds, souls, emotions, words, and actions. Forensic pathologist Heflin tries to clear accused killer Quillan from being railroaded by radio cop Lee Bowman. Marsha Hunt is marvelous as the lady caught in the triangle. John Litel is memorable in supporting role.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
good thriller but you'll remember the lustful looks
dbborroughs5 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Kid Glove Killer concerns murders in connection with an effort to clean up a corrupt town. Van Heflin stars as a forensics expert who is doing the investigation to find out who is responsible. It's the first directed by Fred Zinnemann. It's a good little film but not wholly satisfying because the film seems to be wandering around with too many characters and in too many directions, at least at the start. I never clicked with any one. I also found this film to be frequently funny for all the wrong reasons. It's owing to the over done smoldering looks between Van Heflin and his female assistant…smoldering? Perhaps smoking looks. I say this because the pair are constantly smoking and doing so in the most suggestive manner I've ever seen. It's as close to clothed sex as you're likely to see. It's a one of the clearest definition of lust I've ever seen on screen. Had this film been made 25 or 30 years later they would have been doing less smoking since they would have been engaged in other physical pursuits.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
My brief review of the film
sol-9 February 2006
This early film from Fred Zinnemann has some swiftly edited bits and tautly done sequences, but they are intermittent, and the film does not really showcase the skill that Zinnemann would display in his later films - however that is not to say that this is a bad film. It is rather decent viewing, with an interesting twist on the usual detective storyline, that being that the actual killer is revealed to us earlier on, which places us in the position where we are wondering when he will be caught, rather than who exactly is guilty. The film also uses a lot of science, and while this an element that makes it different to the usual detective stuff, the science is overly complicated and not really well explained. It is mainly the early revelation of the killer that this film is noteworthy for. It is rather obvious at times, and the dialogue is often lame, but for Zinnemann fans it should be quite decent viewing, and even for general fans of its type of detective film, it is probably worth a look.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
White Coats, White Hats
tedg23 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In the thirties, before noir was invented but after talkies arrived, there was an amazing period of experimentation, especially in the mystery. It wasn't settled enough to have conventions yet, except that the bad guy was usually brought to justice.

The pre-genre, pre-noir era is the most interesting in film history, so I'll see any mystery from this period, no questions asked.

The experiment this time has a wisecracking forensic scientist, complete with lab (and lots of visible paraphernalia), lab coat, and beautiful young woman assistant who he secretly loves.

She becomes a love pawn of the criminal, but that's not very interesting. What is interesting is how we experiment with the original notion, the Sherlock Holmes notion of the detective as a scientist. Profound deductions, tenacious curiosity, state of the art (for then) instruments.

Its important. This guy is not getting beat senseless by mobsters. He isn't chasing tight sweaters. He isn't a master of disguise. He doesn't "investigate" in the Hardy Boys manner of stupidly putting yourself in a vacant house with the killer without anyone knowing.

He's just a guy in white coat, discovering the cause of things and wondering how to tell the woman he loves that he does. This finally comes with him writing on a slide for her to "discover" through a telescope.

Its good, the film-making too.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid if inauspicious directorial debut for Fred Zinnemann
a_chinn4 August 2017
The feature film debut of director Fred Zinnemann, the man who'd later go on to direct such classics as "High Noon" and "From Here to Eternity," kicks things off with a solid little police thriller. Van Heflin, an actor who I'm always baffled at how he became a leading man, plays a police chemist uncovering the mayor's murderer. This is strictly B-Movie material, but it's well done and even if you don't see the brilliance you'd see in later Zinnemann films, you do see that he's a solid filmmaker. Certainly worth checking out.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Match me
AAdaSC10 November 2015
Police forensic expert Van Heflin (Gordon) and his assistant Marsha Hunt (Jane) are given a couple of high profile murders to solve whilst lawyer friend and Mayor hopeful Lee Bowman (Gerald) also gets involved and romances Marsha. The film is set in the world of politics and gangster corruption and breezes by at a snappy pace. You know who the villain is but it is the journey as to how he is caught that keeps you watching.

The actors are good even though I had to warm to Van Heflin as he didn't seem very nice at the beginning. And I didn't like how he kept taking Marsha's cigarettes - no-one likes a scrounger. However, he had me supporting him by the end of the film. There are some good sequences involving Heflin as he deduces things logically and we feel he is going to get a realization at any point. Same with Marsha. Is she going to crack the case? She certainly puts her foot in it on a couple of occasions. In terms of plot mystery, we only get one real red herring and that is the title of the film. It doesn't mean anything ........ O.J. Simpson may spring to mind.

Watch out for a hilarious way of retrieving evidence from hair.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
CSI...Circa 1942
LeonLouisRicci30 April 2013
The allure here is the tech-no-babble and gadgetry. Other than that it is a typical "Product" from MGM and it was this type of thing that the Studio dismissed as necessary but beneath the prestige of the Organization that was always "roaring" that they were the King.

But it is an interesting debut from the Director and the two Leads flirt away with comical cynicism. There are a couple of non-laboratory scenes that stand out but most of the intrigue is played out in the exposition of the "new" (you Criminals better watch out) Science now known as Crime Scene Investigation.

Nowhere near the richness of good Film-Noir that was rumbling but wouldn't truly emerge until after the War, this is overall worth a watch if not very intriguing. It is mostly lightweight and only mildly interesting.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Forensics Made Fun!!!!
kidboots15 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is an excellent film featuring Van Heflin and Marsha Hunt as a quirky "odd couple" team. He is Gordon McKay, a forensic investigator and she is Jane Mitchell, his assistant, who just happens to have a degree in chemistry. The chemistry between them is great, with some witty one liners - "cigarette me", "match me", "light me" . Hunt is always on hand to light his cigarette with a bunsen burner!!! To me, Marsha Hunt is a big key to the film's success. Never a big star, she was always memorable (even in a John Wayne Western "Born to the West" (1937)). Finding herself at MGM, she soon settled into a "B" film routine.Although as she said in an interview "At MGM there was never such a thing as a cheap picture. They were usually vehicles for up and coming talent".

When newly elected District Attorney Hunter Turnley is murdered, Jerry Ladimer (Lee Bowman) takes over as special prosecutor and is determined to find the killer. When the crime fighting Mayor (Samuel S. Hinds) is killed, Eddie (Eddie Quillan) a diner owner and someone who is getting fed up with having to pay protection money each week, often almost all he earns, seems an easy suspect. He was determined to see the Mayor that night to tell him of the corruption little shop owners like him have to put up with. Unfortunately a bit of his jacket is found near the Mayor's garage but his protestations of innocence convince Gordon that he is telling the truth. Gordon finds the real killer in an ingenious way but the real entertainment is the lively conversation between Gordon and Jane - they make forensics fun!!!!

Robert Blake is also seen as a child in a car.

Recommended.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MGM B Movie a Notch Above Others - Kid Glove Killer
arthur_tafero28 July 2021
The birth of forensic evidence, such as the kind we are now used to on CSI and other TV shows, became popular in the 1950s and 60s. But before then, there was this film, and a few others like it in the early 1940s that highlighted this new science. Kid Glove Killer is a nice tight little drama in that tradition. With nice direction and solid performances, this little mystery hits the spot. Worth viewing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A terrific little B-picture
planktonrules18 October 2007
This is a wonderful little picture from MGM as it delivers on all levels. Unlike many "B-pictures", this film features better production values, better characters and a much better written script than usual. While MOST B-movies have plot holes and logical errors, this one is very tight and interesting and seems superior to the usual detective films.

Van Heflin plays a brilliant forensic scientist who works for the police. In many ways, he seems like a 1940s version of the TV show CSI--but his assumptions and equipment seem rather realistic and less fantastic than the shows we see on television today. For example, when Van finds what MIGHT be evidence, he is very hesitant to make huge logical leaps and is very cautious and thorough. In addition, he uses standard equipment of the day to investigate the crimes (whereas, CSI often features procedures that are NOT really used today).

Van is ably assisted by the pretty Marsha Hunt--who Van seldom seems to recognize for her many talents. Finally, after seeing no reaction from him, she begins to date the District Attorney and they become quite serious.

There's a lot more to the story than this, but I don't want to spoil it. Just be prepared to be impressed by an intelligently written and acted film--and much of the credit should go to the great director, Fred Zinneman, who is able to get the absolute most from the material. It's not surprising to find that Fred went on to better and more prestigious projects--probably thanks to his success with little films.

FYI--Although the forensics are pretty good, at one point Van picks up what's left of a pipe bomb with his bare hands. What about fingerprints?!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite enjoyable, no flaws, but nothing special in the big picture
secondtake7 June 2018
Kid Gloves Killer (1942)

There might be little to recommend this movie beyond a look at Van Heflin in a constrained early role. Oh, and that the director is the noted Fred Zinneman himself. This is a crime caper formula movie, and it's enjoyable all through. For me, a highlight was the unexpected ease of the leading actress, Marsha Hunt (who is still alive at 100 years old as I write this). She is a kind of "regular girl" who everyone is meant to like, but she has a natural presence on screen that seems like should have meant something bigger. Maybe that kind of "normalness" isn't quite star material, not bigger than life. But see it for her, in a way. Heflin is an acquired taste these days, but an interesting leading man a little different than the rest (he's great in "Martha Ivers" and "Act of Violence"). His role here is meant to be a really determined and uncorruptable science guy in a crime lab. There is a little of that show and tell that happens in some detective movies of the time, but not too much to make it lag. The plot owes something to gangster films, where the big crime guy has the D.A. in his pocket. But this same man is also in love (or pretends to be) with the Hunt character. It's all in good entertainment fun, however, nothing too thrilling, and nothing too corny or cheap either. Back to Zinneman-this is his first feature film direction. The snappy, smart construction might be a sign of things to come, once he gets meatier material.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What a great little film!
Michael195812 September 2002
I saw this gem late one night and found it to be a wonderful movie to watch. Van Heflin and Marsha Hunt handle their roles quite well. Lee Bowman makes much of his sly bad guy role. If you have not seen it-give it a try. It is too bad Van Heflin was not given more roles like this one.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
War Effort At MGM Falls Short
DKosty12315 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, we have a quality director. we do not have a great script and the support cast tries to help Van Heflin as much as possible. this story is just a whole lot weak. We have a mob story and a really dirty Lee Bowman. Heflin gets a run for his money and gets the girl in the end but this one is kind of predictable throughout. The girl he gets is a tattletale that keeps screwing up his investigation of the murders.

It is a script worthy of New York as we have rampant corruption, a protection racket, a radio guy exposing criminals while being one. Then he murders the Mayor and decides to become a politician. He is on the take just as much as one recent NY Politico who took $4 million dollars and then got let off by a court.

In this case, Heflin does stop Bowman and it is all to predictable at the end. There is less mystery here than in a Columbo episode. For the folks doing this, the film looks like the resources at MGM were stretched to thin. This film hurt Van Heflin's career I am sure.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A red herring or two would have been nice
bkoganbing5 November 2010
Fred Zinneman who would go on to direct such classics as High Noon, From Here To Eternity, and The Sundowners made his feature film debut with Kid Glove Killer. If you think you may have seen it before, the film is an expanded feature film version of one of MGM's Crime Does Not Pay series, They're Always Caught. The short subject won an Oscar in that category and it was only four years earlier. You have to know that a lot of people must have gone into the movie house and while watching Kid Glove Killer had to have sworn they had seen this before.

What happens is that the reform mayor of a small city, played by Samuel S. Hinds is killed by a bomb in his home. As in the earlier short film forensics plays a big part in eventually determining who the perpetrator is. CSI man Van Heflin with microscope at the ready sorts through the maze of tiny clues to eventually get the responsible party.

The big problem with Kid Glove Killer is that what was added was a romance between Heflin and Marsha Hunt with Lee Bowman also showing some interest in Hunt. The original film, They're Always Caught did have one red herring suspect and in Kid Glove Killer that part is played by Eddie Quillan.

But it's so obvious who the real killer is that all the suspense is let out of the film. If you can't figure it out watching Kid Glove Killer you have to be deaf, dumb, and blind. Instead of putting in a romantic triangle what should have happened is the story should have been expanded to include a few more additional suspects. I think Kid Glove Killer would have been much the better for that.

Still director Zinnemann got good performances from his cast working from a flawed story.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed