Prisoner of Japan (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Acceptable fare
Leofwine_draca8 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
PRISONER OF JAPAN is a typical WW2 B-movie of the 1940s. It's low budget and dated, and yet it passes the time amiably enough and features some spy-themed hijinks between American and Japanese agents on a Pacific island. The cast was unknown to me but the writer/director is none other than Edgar G. Ulmer, who made the excellent BLACK CAT in 1935. PRISONER OF JAPAN isn't anywhere near the quality of that classic, but it's an acceptable potboiler regardless.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"David, why don't you show Captain Morgan your telescope?"
hwg1957-102-2657045 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
On the tropical island of Nukuloa the owner David Bowman is held prisoner by the Japanese who are using the location for the secret tracking of American convoys and naval vessels. Bowman is a conscientious objector on the island to get away from it all but the war situation forces him to make a stand when several people are killed. Unfortunately Bowman is played by Alan Baxter, who is unconvincing playing a tortured soul.

With a stronger male lead this would have been fine. Gertrude Michael is excellent as Toni Chase who comes to the island looking for Bowman and she is moving in her last scenes in the bombed out bunker awaiting her fate. The editing is surprisingly good for a low budget film with some telling cross cutting of sound and vision.

It could have been a better film but it's not bad.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bald Propaganda Movie
boblipton4 May 2019
Alan Baxter is an astronomer on a small island in the South Pacific. He's working for the Navy, trying to track down a directional radio beacon the Japanese are using. Beautiful women like Gertrude Michael are on the island for reasons that are never made clear. So are Japanese forces in the person of Ernst Deutsch, who are holding him prisoner and making him work for them.

All this is vaguely defined except for the utter evil of Deutsch standing in for all Japanese everywhere -- the actor was originally from Czechoslovakia, which I suppose is practically the same thing. We can tell he's evil, because he's annoying, making up a sizable percentage of the annoyance of this movie.

It being 1942 when this was released, it's to be expected that the propaganda component of this movie would be sizable. Unfortunately its simplicity of characterization takes some competent actors and merely makes them look foolish.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dark Days of the Pacific War.
rmax30482326 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Allan Baxter is the central figure, the young son of a great astronomer. Baxter, now debauched, hangs around on an island in the South Pacific, gazes at the stars and the moon through his first-class telescope, and drinks bourbon. Yes, a wastrel. One of those ne'er-do-well sons.

The island is Nukuloa, which is supposed to be fictional, but there really is a Nukuloa, part of the Wallis Island chain near Fiji. The Japanese never got near it. There's a reference to Baxter's being like "any other drifter in Pago Pago," but Pago Pago is far away in Samoa. Okay, I'll quit with the trivia.

Frankly, there are times when Baxter actually does seem strung out on something. He's slow, deliberate in his movements and his diction. He seems to have been captured in slow motion and has been given little of interest to say. It's too bad because he was so damned good as the villain who tells Robert Cummings that he's going to raise his son with long golden curls, in Alfred Hitchcock's "Saboteur." The chief heavy is Ernst Deutsch. He's a genuine German with a genuine German name and a genuine German accent, but he plays a Japanese sneak named Matsuru. Well, covered up with thick glasses and a mustache, you can't really tell, and anyway in 1942 the enemies were interchangeable.

The dialog has a few tropes of interest. "Your patriotism is useless, like a bird flapping its wings inside a cage." Otherwise the dialog is admirably dull and driven by exposition. That quote comes from Deutsch, who is explaining to Baxter why he, Baxter, is so mixed up. The analysis is concise but it's unnecessary because we already KNOW why Baxter is so vervirrt. A better writer and director would have taken that into account. It's the kind of dialog that slackens the pace of the picture, and it definitely needs more verve. I mean, there are about three small sets. The whole thing comes across as a carelessly written and acted stage play.

I've kind of skipped the plot because it's B-movie routine. But the movie itself is a good historical example of the string that followed the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. Says Baxter: "I HATE war and everything it stands for!" Replies his chipper girl friend, "But you've GOT to fight. Everybody's got to fight." Typically, the early war movies were full of patriotism and heroics. After a few years, there was less moral messaging and more realism. By 1945, when the war ended, it was no longer necessary to tell the audience why we should fight. It was implicit in stories of men sloshing through the mud and cursing one another instead of the enemy.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Japanese house arrest
bkoganbing20 December 2017
PRC in choosing a title for the film used the exact meaning of words. Our protagonist Alan Baxter is not a prisoner in Japan. But he's a prisoner nonetheless. He's under house arrest on his little plantation in a south sea island that is occupied but not openly by the Japanese.

It suits their purposes that way. Baxter is the son of a noted astronomer and one himself, but he's given way to drink and dissipation and he makes a convenient front for their espionage. Especially with that observatory dear old dad built. Just right for keeping track of American naval traffic and air traffic.

If that wasn't enough the Japanese pretending to be islanders have a nice little cafe with a dragon lady type operator who gently pumps navy people for information. Loose lips do sink ships in this film.

A visit by old friend Gertrude Michael persuades Baxter of his patriotic obligations. I think you can figure out the rest.

Doing this PRC flag waver must have really reminded both Baxter and Michael of better days. Baxter's career role was in Each Dawn I Die where he played the aptly named Polecat Carlisle who sets up James Cagney. Michael is best known for playing Calpurnia in Cecil B. DeMille's production of Cleopatra. This PRC film is about as far from DeMille as you can get.

What can I say, script is ludicrous, acting on the high school level, use of light and shadow to cover up shoddy sets. A model PRC film for sure.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
So....the evil Japanese agent is played by a guy named 'Ernst Deutsch'?!
planktonrules11 February 2020
Back in the 1930s and 40s, it was not uncommon to have white folks playing Asians, American Indians and the like. After all, it was the era of Charlie Chan! When seen today, these casting decisions seem insane...and in the case of "Prisoner of Japan", the lead Japanese character is played by Ernst Deutsch--a guy born in Austria-Hungary! Why didn't they just use Deutsch to play a GERMAN bad guy in a different WWII propagnda film?!

The film begins with some US naval officers visiting a small island in the Pacific and having a lovely meal with their American hosts. During this meal, the junior officer sure blabs a lot about secret stuff....which seems incredibly difficult to believe. Then, the Navy folks leave...satisfied that the Bowmans are loyal Americans. However, it's all a ruse...and Japanese soldiers are hidden underneath the house and are operating some sort of radar system.

So why is David Bowman (Alan Baxter) cooperating with the Japanese? Well, he's a complete pacifist and wimp...and will do nothing to fight them in any way. The film clearly is an attack on pacifism and through the course of the movie, it's obvious that it's all about David getting sick and tired of the brutality of the Japanese soldiers and eventually he'll rebell. This is made all the more likely when a plucky American lady (Gertrude Michael) is captured and held by these soldiers....and she keeps needling David to stop being a total wimp!

The budget for this film from tiny Atlantis Pictures was only $19,000--a microscopic budget even for 1942. How could a film possibly be any good when there was no money to pay for competent writers and good actors...as well as a director what wasn't a chimpanzee?! Deutsch looked about as Japanese as a pizza...but the gibberish he spoke sounded a bit Japanesey....and his accent wasn't bad...not that this is a glowing endorsement! The others were just okay...though there was a tendency to overact....and a good director would have re-shot a few of these scenes. Overall, watchable but bad. And it makes you wonder how another studio with better actors, directors and a larger budget could have made this same story.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't be afraid to skip this Poverty Row product
SimonJack16 May 2020
"Prisoner of Japan" was a hard film to sit through. One could see that it was made by a Poverty Row studio, Atlantis Pictures. But even it was among the lesser of the B studios of the day. Of its half dozen movies in 1942 and 1943, the studio had three with some actors of name. But the screenplays for all of these films are just horrible. I have never seen a high school or college play that had scripts as poor as these.

Besides an awful script, this film has a cast in which the few characters seemed to try to under-perform each other. None were much known in 1942. Only Gertrude Michael, as Toni Chase, seemed to have ever had an acting class. Her role was fair. But Alan Baxter as David Bowman, Ernst Deutsch as Matsuru and Tom Seidel as Ensign Bailey were almost laughably bad. The first two were stiff, wooden and hesitant throughout, and Seidel was like a kindergarten kid in a Navy uniform.

The idea for the plot wasn't a bad one. But the screenplay, sets and all technical aspects of the film are poor quality. Thankfully, it was over in 64 minutes. One had to watch to see the end with the subject and title the film has. But, there's absolutely nothing here at all even for war film addicts.

Now, brace yourself, reader, for here's an example of the dynamite dialog in this film. David Bowman, "I'm afraid." Toni Chase, "David, don't be afraid."
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Prisoner of Japan review
JoeytheBrit24 April 2020
Stuffy, set-bound low-budget programmer that shows early promise but then gets bogged down in endless talk. It boils down to a call to pacifists to take up arms and die heroically for their country.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all
charles-p-hall14 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The copy I saw was dark and hard to see, esp. since most of the action takes place at night. I actually thought the script and plot had some original angles. I mean within the first 5 minutes a sailor is describing how radio signals bounce off the Heaviside Layer to his dinner hostess. That plus the fact that two of the three major protagonists are astronomers is pretty unique I think!

But don't get your hopes too high, this is no A picture and it was produced soon after Pearl Harbor by the look of it. Back when there were no real US victories to celebrate and the characters are prone to die suicidally. (Think Robert Taylor in "Bataan" and Alan Ladd in "China").

I've seen far worse than this and I thought the main characters did a nice job, especially Gertrude Mitchell as the dance hall girl turned hero. Also watch out for Corinna Muri from "Casablanca". That may even be the same guitar she's playing!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Of Curiosity Value Only!
JohnHowardReid30 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
We expect much more of cult directors Arthur Ripley and Edgar G. Ulmer than this cheap-jack keep-the-flag flying item which is as poorly acted and scripted as it is bottom-of-the-barrel produced. And along with the movie's sparse production values, it's hard to separate who gives the worst performance. Almost everyone in the cast lacks charisma, but I guess the hammiest is German actor Ernest Dorian. Admittedly, he is given lines that would stump even Humphrey Bogart, but Dorian is also hindered by his mind-boggling casting as a Japanese infiltrator rather than a German spy! Alan Baxter is not much of a hero either, but it is a real shame to find a talented and normally charismatic player like Gertrude Michael cast as the heroine in this cheap-jack, dismal "D"- grade production. Available on a just-watchable Alpha DVD.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great historical period piece
c-3364717 April 2017
The movie like all B-Movies after Pearl Harbor were rushed into production and filled with patriotic themes and adequate production values. To put down or severely criticize these movies is foolish. The movie has value if you view it in its historical time period . Dave O'Brien and all the actors do what they do best act ! If you can understand the full picture in its historical context then you can enjoy the movie. To shoot spitballs and snitty poof bombs at the movie is a reflection on ones own ignorance, arrogance and lack of understanding of the historical era.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A HEARTBEAT AFTER PEARL HARBOR...EDGAR ULMER AND CREW RESPOND
LeonLouisRicci27 August 2021
The Poverty Row Studios Acted Quickly with a Call-To-Arms and did Their Bit to Help Awaken the Sleeping Giant Nation after Japan Rang the Alarm Bell.

Edgar G. Ulmer, now Considered an Influential Author/Director of Any-Budget, Any-Time.

Crafting Out of Seemingly Nothing, Movies that were Poetic Constructions that Entertained Movie-Goers for Decades.

In this Counter-Punch to 12-7-1941, He took $19,000 and Manufactured a Movie that is upon Deep-Reflection much Better than is Given Credit.

While the Acting is Lethargic with Slowly-Paced Dialog and Pauses and tends to Drag, the Film Surprises with Alarming Sound-Effects and Quick-Cutting the Action.

Both of these Types of Flourishes, so Prevalent Today, were Uncommon in 1942.

It Uses Vibrating Sound and Rapid-Editing to Enhance the Film's Lack of Budget and Ulmer Spiced it Up with Inexpensive Creativity.

Slightly Above Average within its Peer-Group, it was an Early Effort for Movies and the War-Time Production of Patriotic Pictures Issued to Inspire.

The Ending is Down-Beat and Sacrificial, but the Message is Clear even to a Pacifist.

Gertrude Michael to Alan Baxter...and American Audiences

"We must fight...Everyone must fight"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed