Air Force (1943) Poster

(1943)

User Reviews

Review this title
69 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Another one for airplane buffs
maddutchy6 January 2007
For modern viewers, this is truly a movie for airplane buffs. How many movies can you find with early B-17s flying? I have always appreciated this movie for that purpose. Those early birds without tail guns and power turrets were all gone by wars end. This movie was made during the dark days of WWII for America and the 'D' models were still fairly new and in use stateside as training aircraft. Thankfully the producers just went to real Army Air Fields and used existing equipment. That is wonderful visual documentation for history buffs! Many 'props' were real! The Air Corps thermos bottles and the Air Crew bandoleers for pistol ammunition were great to see documented.

This was a wartime movie made in a period where we had suffered lots of defeats and few victories. The young men being sent off to war had grown up being taught not to kill their fellow humans. Most of the early war 'propaganda' films went to lengths to 'dehumanize' the enemy so that a young American entering combat would not be conflicted. This happens in all wars but is more obvious to us today due to the amount of films made during WWII. Regarding the talk of 'fifth column' work at Pearl Harbor, I believe some have missed the point of the propaganda. We have become so aware of the race issue that we miss the point made in the film. It was not so much to single out the Japanese ancestry citizens of Hawaii as to make the American people think that it wasn't our military's fault that we were caught by surprise. The theme in that scene and later on Wake Island proffered that 'our boys don't lose in an even fight'. It was to establish confidence in our military and equipment. The idea was to tell the U.S. civilian population that we couldn't lose unless stabbed in the back. Actually, much of our equipment of the time was inferior to our opponents. We also had mostly 'green' troops whereas the Japanese had a lot of combat experienced pilots and troops. It was a tough fight all the way through and our veterans deserve full credit for winning.

This movie is entertaining and a great one for airplane/history buffs who know what is 'right' and what isn't correct. Politically it is dated and must be taken in context. It is still fun to watch and worth your time.
62 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Air Force flies high
johno-211 March 2006
OK, so this is a war years propaganda, moral boosting, rah rah USA, loaded with technical inaccuracies movie. This is still a very good film. Actually far better than most of it's genre from that period. What I like about it is not that it's a war movie but that it has such a fine cast and being set in a single interior for much of the film it comes across more like a good stage play set during combat action of World War II. John Garfield, Gig Young, Harry Carey, George Tobias and Arthur Kennedy are among the stellar ensemble cast in a story about the beginning days of America's entry into World War II. A Hal Wallis production with direction by famed Director Howard Hawks. I've probably seen half of the movies directed by Hawks from his 40 year plus directorial career as has most people since he made so many well-known films but in case you may have missed Air Force you should check it out. Dudley Nichols whose screenplay's include Stagecoach, The Bells of St. Mary's, Gunga Din, The Big Sky and For Whom The Bell Tolls was nominated for the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay for the 1943 Academy Awards. Author William Faulkner collaborated in rewriting a scene and adding additional dialog. The film's only Academy Award went to George Amy for Best Film Editing. I think Hawks should have received a nomination for direction and the film should have also been nominated for cinematography. The large cast probably canceled each other out for any consideration in actor or supporting actor nominations but they put together a compelling performance. It's a great human drama. I would give this an 8.5 out of a possible 10 and recommend it.
27 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For anyone who loves airplanes, it's a must
ross-h2 April 2001
I gave this an enthusiastic 6, and that's not said sarcastically. If you accept it for what it is, a WWII propaganda film, it is (except for the last half hour) very well done. It was made within the constraints of being a propaganda film, the necessity to maintain dramatic flow, incomplete knowledge at the time of all the facts, and the availability of aircraft that the Army Air Corps could provide. The aircraft are clearly the best thing about the film, though Harry Carey came close to stealing the movie. The aerial battles were staged by Paul Mantz, who was THE best in the business. There were two major weaknesses. The first was the frequent references to 5th column activity. Except for one minor incident in the Kauai area, the Japanese-Americans in Hawaii were singularly loyal to the U.S. The biggest weakness was the totally fictitious battle in the last 30 minutes of the movie. It never happened. The only sea battle in that area during that time frame was the battle of the Java Sea, which was a disaster for the U.S. and Dutch forces. Rather it seemed to be an enhanced composite of the attacks on Japanese convoys in the New Guinea/Solomon Islands area, and the battles of Coral Sea and Midway. We had nothing like the forces portrayed available at that time. The fighters shown at Clark Field were Bell P-39s. They were very pretty little planes, but were such a disappointment they earned the nickname Iron Dogs (all metal and "dogs"). But they still would have been far superior to what was actually available there. Sharp-eyed viewers would see that they were also used to stand in for radial-engined Zeroes (P-39s had liquid-cooled engines), along with radial-engined American trainers in the battle scenes. Also, I am practically certain B-17s didn't have the range to fly from Hickam to Clark with only one refueling stop, but that is justified by the necessity for dramatic flow. One more note - the dramatic picture of the capsizing battleship near the end of the movie was not a model, but rather a film of the Austro-Hungarian Szent Istvan sunk in 1918 during WWI.
49 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great movie for the times and even today.
wilstream30 April 2003
I've seen this on cable dozens of times and almost never turn it off when it comes on. Some of the comments about the racist terms are simply naive. Trying to judge a movie 60 years later using political correctness as a measurement is like trying to compare Slater Martin with Michael Jordan. Air Force was released in 1943 meaning it was written and produced shortly after Pearl Harbor. So, the terms "Fried Jap" are understandable considering the times. Yes, the death bed scene was sappy. But the scene where the "Mary Anne" is trying to take off just one step ahead of invading japaness troops is exciting. The special effects are good (again, considering the technology 60 years ago) and although you can point to problems here or there, I think Howard Hawks and a great cast make this a movie people will enjoy for many more decades.
66 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The saga of the Mary Ann
bkoganbing6 November 2019
Air Force is Howard Hawks's ensemble salute to the Army Air Corps. Though John Garfield is in it and he was a major star at Warner Brothers, he really is part of an ensemble cast. Hawks meant this as an ensemble piece and you know that by the billing where the crew of the B-17 nicknamed by the crew the Mary Ann is in rank order. Tail gunner Garfield is down the list.

The plane leaves 12/6/41 for Hickam Field in Hawaii and we know what happened the next day. The Mary Ann lands and takes off and makes a bunch of stops where the Japanese are attacking. In the end they are part of a nasty battle.

Warner Brothers special effects was at the top of its game. The cast is perfectly suited for their roles right down to a dog that gets hostile at the name Moto. Captain John Ridgely's death scene is the dramatic highlight of the film.

Air Force got an Oscar for film editing. It's a wartime flag waver to be sure but it still holds up well today.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Standard WWII Morale Booster
dglink12 January 2005
Howard Hawk's "Air Force" is another in a long list of patriotic films about America's fighting men during World War II that were made to raise the spirits of audiences back home. Stereotypes abound, clichés come hard and fast, and the hokum flies faster than the planes as a flying fortress on a routine reconnaissance flight from California in early December 1941 is enmeshed in the Japanese attacks on U.S. Pacific bases. However, despite the requisite sentiment that includes cloying death bed scenes, teary-eyed mothers, and even a stowaway dog, "Air Force" stays on course under Hawk's steady direction and is fairly entertaining fare. The strong cast, which includes John Garfield, Gig Young, and Arthur Kennedy, is excellent and delivers the uninspired dialog with credibility. Although the considerable talents of these actors are not taxed, Garfield plays to type as the cynic who rises to handle the unfolding events, and a mustached Young provides solid support as the co-pilot. In addition to the cast, James Wong Howe's dramatic black and white cinematography is another major asset, and viewers have much time to admire his work with light and shadow during the talky episodes that take place within the claustrophobic plane. While there are too many stretches of dialog during the early part of the movie, a climactic air/sea battle brings the film to an exciting conclusion. A fine cast, outstanding photography, and a few good action sequences outweigh the overused plot devices and deliver an entertaining film that will quickly become blurred in memory with dozens of other similar war films made during the mid-1940's.
30 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Technically astonishing, just a great movie, but so flawed in its chipper tone it's hard to watch
secondtake4 April 2011
Air Force (1943)

There are many reasons this is an important film, but there are a couple reasons why this isn't an especially watchable one.

First, it's in the middle of the war, the big one, two years after Pearl Harbor and two years before Hiroshima. You can't expect anything but a slightly (or not so slightly) propaganda leaning movie. The fleet of flying fortresses (B-17 bombers) that make the basis for the movie are impressive machines, and the men are shown to be both competent and likable, good American boys and men. Director Howard Hawks had just finished "His Girl Friday" and "Ball of Fire," both comic masterpieces, and he was about to film "To Have and Have Not" with his buddy Humphrey Bogart. "Air Force" is not just a film between great films, it's made to the same high standards.

You'll see some astonishing photography here, by James Wong Howe (who made some other war films along with a dozen masterpieces among his 136 features over a lifetime). Part of the filming is on the ground, with great light and shadow and framing, and part are airborne battle scenes, including shooting enemy planes in midair, very dramatically. And the editing, which won an Oscar, is conspicuously excellent. Not only are the normal continuity edits from scene to scene and shot to shot sharp and perfect, there are also many times (during battle scenes) where the editing turns to fast cuts, or montage, that is really first rate. It would seem avant-garde in a less militaristic world.

What else to like? Well, the plot in its overview is fair enough, beginning with a chilling realization as the planes leave San Francisco that while flying to Hawaii the Japanese have attacked and they have nowhere to land. The emergency begins immediately. The actors, a few famous ones like John Garfield thrown in, are in good form, and the sense of group effort with the occasional disgruntled outsider is firmed up well.

But, in the end, the movie almost unwatchable if you care at all about realism. I don't mean accuracy, but believability. The men are endlessly cheerful in an offhand way even as they are about to die, or the world is crumbling around them. They gather to talk or chitchat and the camera has them fit the frame with almost a parody of posing. This isn't war, this is a movie, it seems to shout. Well, fine, it's a movie, and so you never quite buy into it. The events are sometimes implausible, as well, and of course, things work out well over all. Too well.

I have to say loudly that I understand why the movie was made this way. There was no room in 1943 in people's hearts or consciences for doubting and cynicism as people were being drafted, wounded, killed, and terrorized by actual battle, including battle from the air. But that doesn't mean it makes for relevant watching now. It's interesting, it's well made, it's important as part of how Americans saw the war through Hollywood's eyes, but it's also hard to get what it might have meant to home audiences back then.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Exemplary Hawks
rmax30482324 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
An exciting, touching, and funny movie, one of Hawks' best.

It's a richly textured work, with several sub-narratives weaved into one another.

The most important is the voyage of the new B-17, the "Mary Ann", from California to Honolulu to Wake Island to Clark Field in the Phillipines. Movies about journeys can be exciting, if they're well done, as this one is. There is the change of scenery, the dramas large and small at the stopovers, and above all the living that goes on within the vehicle. There is a lot of model work involved, out of necessity, but it has a reassuring cartoonish quality. I loved those wooden miniature airplanes taking off without lifting their noses, as if levitating rather than flying. And the tiny papier-mache palms, and the fake studio jungles. Within the limits of the available technology, it's pretty well done. As the model B-17 taxis its way across the tarmac, we can even hear the squealing of its brakes as the pilot applies them.

The voyage is fascinating not just because we are following the Mary Ann, but because we get to know what it's like to live inside the fuselage, to fly and defend the airplane, to work on its engines and to feed it gasoline by using a bucket brigade. Most of all we get to know the tiny social system of the men and how they are knitted together by circumstances into a solidary group.

This is true Hawks territory. Here we have John Garfield as the cynical flight-school washout Winocki. (Cf., Christopher Walken's monologue in "Pulp Fiction.") Garfield sneers at the others and hates the skipper, the good-natured, efficient, and highly respected James Ridgely as "Irish" Quincannon. Ridgely tries to explain to Garfield that it doesn't matter what any single person's feelings are. We are all part of a team here; each of us depends on the other; we support and help one another; we'd give each other our last pair of socks; in fact, two of the crew are married to each other. (Well -- not that.)

Garfield is finally won over after the attack on Pearl Harbor. (Kids, that was the beginning of World War II for us. PS: We won.) The way the crew learns the news is just plain fine. What craftsmanship. The radioman is sitting at his console and loses contact with Honolulu before picking up some gunshots and Japanese chatter. It's a sign of the care that was taken in this film that we get to appreciate the job that the RADIOMAN is doing! In almost every other film involving a bombers we get to know only the pilots and the gunners -- sometimes the bombardier. But in this case we get to see the kind of job everyone does, including the crew chief, and, in a suspenseful miniepisode, the navigator. The NAVIGATOR! Usually if he's included at all, it's only to get his head blown off.

Hawks is fond of the gradual integration of an outsider into the group, the willing penetration of social borders. Sometimes it's a "girl," as in, "Only Angels Have Wings." (When Jean Arthur sits down to play the guys' piano, Cary Grant advises her, "You'd better be good.") Here it's Garfield, who begins by hating the Air Corps and ends by being a fully functioning team member, and an innovative leader. If that's not enough, we have yet another playful rivalry between the Mary Ann's crew and a passenger they pick up -- a pursuit pilot who jokes about the furniture vans that bomber crews have to fly around in. Does he turn into a fully functioning team member at the end too? Yes, he does, although as far as we know he's had to multi-engine time at all. No matter.

The essence of Hawks' fascination with male solidarity is probably best expressed in the scene in which the Mary Ann is being attacked over a (fictional) Japanese fleet. As a Zero homes in on the B-17 from a given position, the gunner on that side yells out to the captain, "Swing her a little to the left!", and Ridgely makes the airplane yaw slightly to give the gunner a better shot at the Zero. Let me put this another way -- an enlisted gunner is telling the captain of the airplane what to do. And the officer happily complies. That is teamwork. The crew transcend their individuality. They're like a single organism.

"Irish" dies towards the end in a scene that could have been so much cornier than it is. (Faulkner is said to have written part of it.) Everyone of importance is in the death scene and plays a part.

The movie practically falls apart at the end, unfortunately. Our airplanes seem to blow the entire Imperial Japanese Navy out of the water in a battle that resembles nothing of historical value. And yet even the final scene, of the Mary Ann crash landing in the rolling surf, is exciting enough to help us forget the obvious propaganda of the previous scene. The problem, though, is that the racism runs all the way through the film. Okay, let's accept dialog like, "Fried Jap going' down!", when a Zero explodes. But the Japanese in Hawaii are treated as treacherous cowards, which, by the time of this movie's release, should have been a myth long dispelled. Of course there was never any sabotage. They were American citizens before they were Japanese.

Anyway, an outstanding adventure movie. Nothing arty or pretentious, simply a nicely executed work. One of the best films to be made during the war.
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining
grantss16 June 2016
A B-17 bomber flies from San Francisco to Hawaii, arriving on...7 December 1941. They arrive in the middle of the attack on Pearl Harbor. They survive Pearl Harbor and are sent to the Philippines, where things aren't much easier.

The year of release (1943) should give it away that this is going to contain a fair amount of WW2 propaganda. And it does. Still, it is pretty entertaining, and the jingoism doesn't get excessive.

Goodish plot, solidly directed and acted. Some of the battle scenes and plots are quite unrealistic though. Still, the flying scenes are good fun.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gives you some idea what ww2 was about.
hayseed8 August 1999
This movie was made in 1943 and gives you a good idea of what people thought about the war,axis and the japs.Altho this movie is quite gung ho, you have to remember that at the time this movie was made nothing had been settled. It is well worth watching.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rote WWII picture
zetes4 March 2012
Hawks makes some pretty rousing war propaganda. I loved the start of this film, with a bomber traversing the Pacific Ocean to Hawaii on December 6th, 1941. They arrive the next morning and lose radio contact in the middle of a transmission. When they get back in contact with someone, they find out about the Pearl Harbor raid. After they land and are sent toward the Philippines, the film becomes a pretty rote, gung-ho piece. The most recognizable star in the cast is John Garfield, who plays a man who failed to become a pilot and plans on quitting the Air Force ASAP - that is, until he finds out about the attack. Then he's eager to pick up a machine gun and mow down some rice-eating mofos! Despite the film's lack of narrative ambition, Hawks' direction is often fantastic. As with most every war film of the period, there's a lot of stock footage of the battles. Hawks does a great job to make it as invisible as possible - you can tell most of the time, but it's as good as I've ever seen it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Air Force" Ranks As One of the Best Propaganda Movies of World War II
zardoz-138 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Not only did Warner Brothers use the Boeing B-17 bomber as the centerpiece of one of its earliest battle front movies, "Flying Fortress," but the studio also used the bomber as an allegory for American tenacity in "Scarface" director Howard Hawks "Air Force." According to World War II film historian Lawrence Suid, Jack Warner approached U.S. Army Air Force (USAAF) commanding officer General Henry 'Hap' Arnold not long after Pearl Harbor about making a film about the USAAF. Suid says that Arnold approved Warner Brothers' request, and the War Department provided the studio with a plethora of information about their planes and pilots, which scenarist Dudley Nichols included in his original screenplay. Warner Brothers' studio chief Jack Warner hired aviation enthusiast Howard Hawks to direct "Air Force," and Hawks started shooting on June 18, 1942, at Drew Air Force Base in Florida and completed the picture four months later on October 26.

"Air Force" chronicles the routine flight of a B-17 Flying Fortress, nicknamed the 'Mary Ann,' from San Francisco to Hawaii. The crew consisted of an ethnically and geographically diverse group of men, a casting theme that recurred throughout World War II movies and reflected the melting pot identity of America. Unlike MGM's "Bataan" and Twentieth Century Fox's "Crash Drive" (1943), however, Warner Brothers never integrated African-Americans into the ranks of its battle front films.

As the 'Mary Ann' approaches Honolulu, the crew hears Japanese gibberish on the radio and is even more shocked by the sight of Japanese planes dropping bombs and strafing the base. The Pearl Harbor flight tower diverts the 'Mary Ann' to Maui where it lands to repair a wheel. When Japanese-American snipers open fire on the fliers, the crew flies to Wake Island where the Marines are preparing their a gallant last stand. At Clark Field, the crew reloads their guns and ascends to battle the Japanese. The 'Mary Ann' is so badly riddled with bullet holes and the skipper so severely wounded that he orders everybody else to bail out. A recalcitrant gunner (John Garfield) who washed out of flying school ignores the skipper's orders and lands the bomber.

Frantically, despite their orders to destroy it, the reunited crew patches up the plane. Not only do they load up with bombs, but they also remove the tail section and install a machine gun. The crew manages to get their B-17 off the ground before the Japanese overrun the island. During their flight to Australia, they sight a Japanese fleet, radio their position, and sink some of the ships. As the film draws to a close, the 'Mary Ann' survivors prepare to spearhead an aerial attack on Japan.

At a time when the government restricted all Hollywood studios in terms of the money that they could spend on a film, the U.S. Army-Air Force's assistance proved invaluable in giving the film an aura of authenticity. For example, the nine B-17s seen in flight during the early scenes of Air Force were actually filmed on location in Florida by Warner Brothers. When the studio staged Japanese plane crashes and tricky B-17 landings in the jungle, the studio relied on miniatures. According to a War Department letter dated June 6, 1942, "It is the policy of the War Department not to allow soldiers or military equipment to be disguised and photographed as representing the personnel or equipment of foreign countries." The War Department sidestepped its own rule when it helped Warner Brothers produce Air Force. According to Suid, the War Department appointed Captain Samuel Triffy as technical adviser, and Triffy "flew both an Army two-place trainer and a fighter painted with the Rising Sun emblem in the combat sequences portraying Japanese attacks on American aircraft and military positions." Triffy sought as much as possible to ensure that Air Force appeared "as authentic as we could make it under the circumstances." All Howard Hawks' movies are about men bonding as a group. Women are few and far between in "Air Force,' but they populate the storyline. Dudley Nichols' screenplay with help from William Faulkner contains many good scenes. Some are tragic, such as the flight crew chief's story about his son, and some are funny, such as the dog that barks at Japanese. The death scene where the pilot takes off from his hospital bed with his companions helping him simulate this take-off to the big hangar in the sky is memorable. Today, "Air Force" seems quaint and corny, especially the aerial gunner's change of attitude. Initially, the John Garfield character doesn't plan to re-enlist, and he behaves like a complete prima donna, particularly because the 'Mary Ann's' pilot washed him out of pilot school, but the aerial gunner changes his mind when he see Pearl Harbor in flames.

The U.S. Government propaganda agency, the OWI-BMP praised "Air Force" for five reasons. First, the crew constituted an ethnic melting pot. Second, the crew's perfect teamwork made the mission of the "Mary Ann" successful. Third, the officials applauded the fact that the filmmakers showered glory on an older mechanic sergeant who maintained the plane rather than on the younger more glamorous pilots. Fourth, as a combat picture, "Air Force" proved exciting without "the pitfall of showing too much blood and suffering." Fifth, the plot emphasized a good-natured rivalry between fighter pilots and bomber pilots. Ultimately, the OWI-BMP found the flaws in "Air Force" "serious but remediable; its good points are very good indeed—well worth the effort to revise the script so that it will perform a truly valuable service of war information." Altogether, "Air Force" is one of the best Allied propaganda movies of World War II.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the finest of the WWII films , following the hazardous exploits of a Boeing B-17 bomber crew
ma-cortes3 March 2022
A jingoist and attractive WWII movie about brave pilots with stunning main and support cast . An epic and unbashedly patriotic drama movie with noisy action , thrills and dangerous aerial scenes . Thundering and patriotic drama about aviators , set in the Pacific Ocean . The Mary Ann, a B-17 Flying Fortress, takes off from California for Hawaii on a routine training flight on December 6, 1941. As the brave team of flyers have to fly over perilous obstacles , hemmed in by impassable hazards , and dogfighting the feared Japanese planes , as the personal and work ethics of this little crew become magnified to epic proportions . It stars brash , daredevil pilots on a B-17 bomber fighting over Pearl Harbor . Later on, the crew on board the Mary Ann going through action at Wake Island , the Philippines, and the Battle of the Coral Sea. Packed with power...loaded with thrills...the story of the men who fly against the Japanese ...for US. Giants of the sky ...blazing a trail to victory!. The thrill studded story of Mary Ann - Darling of the Air Force -Loved by 9 Men - And true to them all !

A WWII drama movie with flag-waging American sentiment , thrills , suspense , dangerous aerial scenes , occasional truculence , and battle scenes . This is a powerful film competently directed by the great master Howard Hawks and it displays extremely realistic dogfight sequences , though many of them are used some scale models or miniatures . This exciting and thrilling film focus on the group of pilots and soldiers on board plane become involved into Pearl Harbor attack , resulting in fateful consequences . Adding a purposeful and believable storyline by prestigious Dudley Nichols , including interesting lines. This Howard Hawks production is a hell of a war movie , combining with some effective quiter moments . It is plenty of riveting technical detail and there's richly rounded support cast .There's also also an introspective real guy interfacing by the ensemble cast , they are a nice group of actors giving fiercely well-defined portrayals of soldiers under stress , being masterfully played by a lot of familiar faces , such as : John Ridgely who was a character player and here in a rare leading role , a young Gig Young , Arthur Kennedy to beging along career , veteran Harry Carey , plum-nosed George Tobias , early deceased John Garfield , Charles Drake , James Brown , Ray Montgomery , Moroni Olsen , Edward Brophy , Richard Lane , Stanley Ridges , among others.

It displays a moving and rousing musical score by classic composer Franz Waxman . It's all topped off with the vividly charming black and white which typified the period from director of photography James Wong Howe . This propaganda picture was professionally directed by Howard Hawks , and there this great filmmaker creates some nice action scenes , as it has worn well through the years , in spite of the extremely propaganda and patriotist yarn . Hawks's filmmaking is masterly in its economy , power and pace . Formidable director Howard Hawks made a lot of films in all kind of genres and creating some masterpieces. He was one of the best Golden Hollywood directors and creator of authentic classics . Hawks directed all kinds of genres with intelligence and skillness enough . Hawks made Wartime : Air Force , Sergeant York ; Westerns : Barbary Coast , Big Sky , The Outlaw , Rio Bravo , Red River , El Dorado Rio Lobo ; Comedy : His Girl friday , Bringing up Baby , Ball of Fire , Gentlemen prefer Blondes , Monkey Business ; Noir genre : Scarface , Criminal Code, Big Sleep, To Have or Have not , and Adventure : Hatari, Only angels have wings . The flick will appeal to Howard Hawks enthusiasts . This is an epic WWII /drama at its best. Rating : 7/10 . Better than average . Worthwhile seeing .
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
well-made but brainless
planktonrules2 August 2005
This was an American WWII propaganda film first and foremost. Because of that, acting, writing and shmaltz are paramount and realism is, at best, an after-thought. And I CAN respect the excellent acting by this fine ensemble cast. But, what I CAN'T respect is the utter silliness of the film.

The film begins on December 6, 1941--just a day before Pearl Harbor. The crew of a B-17 unknowingly approaches what will soon become a theater of war. As hostilities break out, they are forced to fly from one location to another trying to save their hides and strike back against the Japanese. The problem is, the B-17 appears to be nearly indestructible--as it manages to shoot down Zero after Zero with hardly a scratch. It reminded me of an arcade version of air combat (like Nintendo's 1942). If our bombers HAD been that effective, the war would have only lasted a few weeks! I guess, though, that the movie would have been a lot less interesting and detrimental to morale if they'd been shot down in their first encounter--which probably would have happened in real-life.
13 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Air power picture that fits the mood of the time it was made..
yenlo2 August 2001
One of the great things about motion pictures in this country is how they change with the times. Take this picture for example which came out in 1943. The U.S. was in the thick of the war and this was a film like many made during that time to stir patriotic fever and make Americans "hate the evil yellow enemy" (and the Nazis too!). It's full of everything to make the viewer feel good about our boys who are doing the fighting. A B-17 bomber crew where there seems to be no problems, only the desire to "Shoot down Japs" Now go forward about six years to 1949 and "Twelve O'Clock High" and watch that film about B-17 Bomber Crews. Could "Air Force" have cut it with movie goers any time after 1946? Could "Twelve O'Clock High" have made it with a 1943 audience? Probably not. So watch this picture and remember when it came out and what the mood in this country was and you'll truly enjoy it. Also don't forget to see "Twelve O'Clock High" as well, maybe right after seeing this one.
41 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
War Propaganda Well Done
DKosty12327 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Starting with the Lincoln Quote from the Gettysburg Address through the Rah Rah ending, this war movie perfectly reflects the time it is made. These were the dark times when the Pearl Harbor Attack happened. It is the equal to 9/11/2001 in it's time.

This movie is about rallying the troops by telling the story of the B-17 Mary-Ann, which starts with the plane flying into Pearl Harbor after the attack all the way to the Philippines. It is quite a story as the tragic consequences of the start of the war are worked into the story.

The mood of war propaganda is captured perfectly. In fact, I be the entire movie had to be approved by every government censor of the era. The special effects are top notch and the final battle sequence where it appears half of the Japanese Navy is sunk is pure propaganda.

Still, Warner Brothers is successful here packaging the story to the mass audience at the time. The action is worth the admission even if the story is lacking due to the censors.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid World War II Film
gavin694231 May 2013
The crew of an Air Force bomber arrives in Pearl Harbor in the aftermath of the Japanese attack and is sent on to Manila to help with the defense of the Philippines.

I like that rather than being a historical film that looks back, it was actually filmed shortly after Pearl Harbor and while the war against the Japanese was still quite active. In this way it could be considered a propaganda or recruitment film. Had America lost the war (nearly impossible, but still) this would have been an interesting artifact.

The story is pretty good, and has a nice mixture of humor and seriousness. Of course, being a war film where people are getting killed, you can only have so much humor, but adding the dog and some clever remarks ("can you keep a secret?") really helped.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wild Blue Yonder
kenjha5 July 2007
During WW2, an Air Force crew flies from San Francisco to Pearl Harbor to Wake Island to Manilla, fighting Japs. Hawks was the master of exploring the theme of camaraderie among men of action and this one is scores on that front. The battle scenes are very exciting, greatly helped by the cinematography of James Wong Howe. The familiar cast includes many fine performances, including Garfield as a disgruntled tail-gunner, Ridgely as the pilot, and Carey as the old crew chief. The only problem is that it is little more than a propaganda film, intended to boost the morale of Americans as our boys fought overseas. As such, the loose plot isn't very engaging.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Howard Hawks uses the crew of the "Mary Ann" to show us how America will prevail in WWII. Fine propaganda and a fine movie
Terrell-430 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
When the nine-man crew of the B-17 Flying Fortress "Mary Ann" left San Francisco for Hawaii, they knew it was a routine training flight. What they didn't know, and we do, is the significance of the date...December 6, 1941. By the time they reach Hawaii, Hickam Field and Pearl Harbor are in flames. They manage to land on a small emergency field and are ordered to refuel immediately and set off for the Philippines, where every bomber and fighter plane is desperately needed. They'll need to refuel at Wake Island. At Wake they find the American outpost under heavy attack and facing the immediate threat of a Japanese landing. Every soldier and Marine on the island knows it's going to be a matter of fighting and dying. By the time the Mary Ann reaches Clark Field outside Manila, the Japanese are pushing rapidly south. The crew has fought off Japanese fighters and is now shot up and must be repaired. The crew manages to cannibalize the ruined hulks of planes caught on the ground, scrounge gasoline, and barely escape the first attack of Japanese infantry. By now some of the crew have been wounded, some have died. They set course for Australia, and on the way spot a major Japanese invasion force heading south. The crew alerts American forces and directs them to what turns out to be the Battle of the Coral Sea. After the battle, the Mary Ann barely makes it to a controlled crash landing near Darwin. When we last see the crew, those who survived, they're getting ready to lead a massive air attack on Tokyo.

With Air Force, Howard Hawks managed to create, in my opinion, one of the most effective of Hollywood's war-time movies. Sure, it has its clichés -- does any group of fighting men in WWII ever not have a guy from Brooklyn? And it has its jingoistic moments -- it heavily hints that Hawaii had home-grown fifth columnists. What it has in abundance is a carefully crafted movie that for the most part lets us see for ourselves through this crew the issues at hand. It takes us on a perilous journey that shows the consequences of some of our actions, the determination to endure and the grit to win. Hawks does this with four supremely effective themes:

First, Who are we? Hawks lets us get to know this crew, especially in the first hour. They may be all singularly clean-cut, but Hawks takes us along as we see how they do their jobs professionally, work as a team and overcome difficulties. The players in this crew are Irish Quincannon (John Ridgely), the pilot, cheerful, open and competent; Bill Williams (Gig Young), the co-pilot, a young but steady second in command; Tommy McMartin (Arthur Kennedy), the bombardier, eager to be in the fight and the brother of the girl Williams is getting serious about; Monk Hauser (Charles Drake), the navigator, who has a tradition to live up do and the challenge of finding Wake Island, a tiny spot in the Pacific Ocean; Robbie White (Harry Carey) the seasoned crew chief, a sergeant whose son is a lieutenant in the Philippines; Weinberg (George Tobias), the assistant crew chief and a gunner, always ready with a joke; Peterson (Ward Wood), the radio operator; Chester (Ray Montgomery), the assistant radio operator and gunner, green as they come; and finally Joe Winocki (John Garfield), embittered because he washed out of pilots training school. Along as a passenger is Tex Rader (James Brown), a fighter pilot hitching a ride from Hawaii to the Philippines. We get to see how they make a team, which eventually includes Winocki. And we share their confidence. "Uncle Sam is a pretty tough old gentleman," says White to the young crew. "You just wait until he gets mad."

Second, Do we have the right stuff to fight? Hawks shows us what we're up against. He demonstrates the dire situation America is facing. Hickam Field, Wake Island and Clark are disasters. He also shows us the grit and resolve of America's fighting men. "If you see my old boss, General MacArthur," says a wounded officer on Wake, "tell him no matter what the news is, we'll be in here pitching until they strike us out."

Third, Do we have what it takes to win? Hawks shows the ingenuity and the determination of Americans to persevere and overcome any odds. The whole long sequence of repairing the Mary Ann in the face of Japanese attacks by air and land is an exciting and moving metaphor for how America will ultimately prevail. The crew struggles through the night using spare parts, sweat and ingenuity, everyone working together.

Fourth, Will we achieve victory? Having spent an hour and a half showing us the issues and defining the character of America through these crew members, Hawks takes us to a defining moment when he shows us how America will wreak havoc on Japan. When the Mary Ann alerts American forces to the presence of the Japanese invasion fleet, Hawks creates a massive attack by air power on the Japanese fleet that is almost cathartic. It goes on and on, combining war footage from the Battle of the Coral Sea with fairly well-done miniatures. The Japanese fleet is turned into sinking hulks.

This is one of the shrewdest and most effective of Hollywood's war-time WWII movies. Hawks' gives us a four-part drama made up of carefully selected themes. It's as effective as you'd ever want.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Patriotic WWII Aerial Drama.
AaronCapenBanner7 November 2013
Howard Hawks directed this patriotic WWII drama about a B-17 bomber(nicknamed the MaryAnn, but known as a flying fortress) crew arriving from San Francisco into Honolulu who fly straight into WWII on December 7, 1941. The crew(played by actors Gig Young, Arthur Kennedy, John Garfield, Harry Carey, George Tobias, among others) are shocked by the attack, but gather themselves together as they are sent to Manila to defend the Philippines, then become increasingly nomadic, going wherever they are needed, as their plane becomes increasingly battered, and crew start dying... Exciting and well-made film must have been a real morale booster in 1943, and remains a stirring film today.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Air Force Soars ****
edwagreen3 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Tenacity is definitely the theme of this 1943 film where a group of army men go on a routine trip from San Francisco to Hawaii, and as they approach, the Japanese have bombed Pearl Harbor leading to the advent of America coming into World War 11.

John Garfield is perfect here as the pilot who was removed from his pilot duties, and as expected, he gives that embittered performance, only coming to realize true commitment when war strikes.

George Tobias, as Weinberg, is there for comedy relief and he does a wonderful job of it.

The dedication of these men who went on to Wake Island and prevent a Japanese attack on Australia is well done. There is a gem of a performance by Harry Carey as an elder officer who is one of the crew who wonders what has happened to his son, the latter stationed in the Philippines. When the news comes, Carey is stoic and carries on his mission. Garfield is the anti-hero here and the part is just perfect for him. Embittered by being dropped from flight school, he shows his mettle when he and the others are caught up in the advent of World War 11. A remarkable film
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Make every shot count! We've got a lot to pay them back for!
sol-kay16 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** On a routine flight from San Francisco to Honolulu the crew of the B-17 bomber, one of nine on the flight, Mary-Ann gets the shocking news that Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japaneses that left the US Pacific Fleet in shambles. Angry as hell and wanting to get back at the Japs for what they did the bomber's crew members, despite their differences, unite in the cause to fly the bomb-laden bomber into the teeth of the Royal Japanese Navy and bomb the living hell out of it! Even if in the end they all end up going under, the waves of the Pacific, with it!

Rip roaring and at times tragic war movie about how the US got its act together after getting sneaked attacked by the Japs and ended up giving em', the Japanese Pacfic Fleet and imperial Army, hell all throughout the vast and bloody Pacific Theater of War! The hell meted out on the Japs in the movie is that by the crew of the Mary-Ann who island hopped from Hawaii to Wake Island to the Philippians, before the Japs captured them, and ended up leading the charge at the surprised Jap fleet, who thought that they already won the war, in the battle or the Coral Sea. It was the battled scared and heroic B-17 Mary-Ann together with the remainder of what was left of the US Army Air Force that ended up blasting it, the Imperial Japanese Navy, to smithereens in that naval slug-fest!

Of course there were losses on our-the USA-side as well that included the Mary-Ann's Captain Quincannon and radio man Chester together with scores of US Army Navy and Marine personal but that was nothing compared what the Japs got in them losing almost their entire navy and air force including dozens of Jap fifth columnists, who were secretly working undercover for Tojo, by the time the movie ended.

Effective WWII propaganda movie released at the worst of times for the US and its allies in battling the Axis forces who at the time, late 1942, were in fact winning the war. The B-17-or Mary-Ann's, crew took everything that the Japs could throw at them and ended up shooting down dozens of Jap Zeros before the plane was finally, after losing a wing tip engine and a good part of its fuselage, grounded by Jap Zero machine gun and cannon fire. After being repaired and airborne the Mary-Ann continued to give it back to the Japanese in the final and climactic battle, the Battle of the Coarl Sea, in the film that saw the Japanese fleet, and thousands of its sailors and marines, end up dying for their emperor in ways they never expected to: By them being prevented in kamikaze like suicide attacks in them both dying and taking their hated enemy, the US Army Navy and Marines, along with them!

P.S There's some major inaccuracies in the movie especially that of Japanese/Americans, in the Hawaiian island, joining in with the attacking Japs in sabotaging US military and naval installations in and around Pearl Harbor. There's also the fact that the Battle of the Coral Sea, in May 1942, ended in a drew between the US and Japanese navies instead, like in the film, of being a total and decisive victory for the US. But still who need accuracy when your country is in a life and death struggle with a highly motivated and determined enemy and any negative news, accurate or not, could only help its cause. If like in all war propaganda films bending the facts can turn things around on your side, like the film "Air Force" did, and motivate the public to willingly join in the fight who cares it the facts in the film aren't exactly on the level, like in the Battle of he Coarl Sea, or not even right, like in the case of Japanese/American fifth columnists, at all!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Really Great Movie ... Even in 2006
tonyrony10 August 2006
I've seen parts of this movie over the years, but today I finally had a chance to see nearly all of it. I'm going to buy a copy, too, even though it's available only on VHS, at present.

I have my favorite movies that I enjoy seeing again and again. However, I don't easily consider making changes to my list of favorites. "Air Force," though, has earned its way onto my list.

The last time I saw any part of Air Force was during my teens; forty years have passed and I now have a keener eye. I found the story was surprisingly rich with numerous colorful characters. The dialogue impressed me and the pace is sometimes quite rapid. Therefore, getting the Oscar for Best Film Editing was not a surprise.

Seeing Air Force today, August 10th, 2006, was especially 'exciting' to me, for lack of a better word. Soon this date will not seem very remarkable, but it happens to be the day on which Pakistani, British, and American intelligence organizations revealed and thwarted a plot to destroy approximately ten trans-Atlantic airliners. Twenty-four people were arrested in conjunction with the uncovering of that plot.

So for me, the battles and hardships endured by the characters in Air Force struck a special chord inside me, today. I'll remember how moved I was for a long, long time.

Go get yourself a copy. It'll show you a lot about an important time in world history.

Tony
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Howard Hawks directs this WW II movie that was recognized with an Editing Oscar
jacobs-greenwood17 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
John Ridgley plays Captain Mike "Irish" Quincannon, the pilot of a B-17 bomber (the Mary-Ann) whose crew includes crew chief Sergeant Robbie White (Harry Carey), co-pilot Lieutenant Bill Williams (Gig Young), bombardier Lieutenant Tommy McMartin (Arthur Kennedy), navigator Lieutenant "Monk" Munchauser (Charles Drake), assistant crew chief Corporal Weinberg (George Tobias), and radio operator Corporal Peterson (Robert Wood). There are two new additions made to the crew at the beginning of the film: a greenhorn youngster Private Chester (Ray Montgomery), and a "washed out pilot, now aerial gunner" Sergeant Joe Winocki, cynically played by (who else?) John Garfield.

Evidently, there was a little intra-service rivalry within the Army between big plane crews and pursuit plane pilots in those days, so James Brown plays Lieutenant Tex Rader, a fighter pilot. Also recognizable in this film is Edward Brophy, as a Marine Corps Sergeant J. J. Callahan.

It is December 6, 1941 as the film opens and a squadron of B-17s begins their journey from San Francisco to Hickam Field, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The first part of the movie establishes the relationship between the crew members which is pretty much as a team familiar and comfortable with each other. Enter the new guys: Private Chester is a gung ho rookie excited about everything, Winocki is wise guy who rains on his parade and can't wait till his last three weeks in the service are up. Apparently, Winocki was a failure in flight school and it was Captain Quincannon, who signed the recommendation that ended his dream of being a pilot. The 20- year veteran crew chief Sgt. White doesn't like Winocki's attitude, especially because his son has just been promoted to Lieutenant Colonel within the ranks.

Everything is pretty routine until Hickam Field's radio transmission goes out. The radio operator is able to pick up Japanese voices and background static which doesn't sound good, explosions etc.. When the squadron leader finally gets through to someone in Pearl Harbor, they are told to land at their pre-planned alternate locations. For the Mary-Ann, that means a short, rough runway on the Hawaiian island Maui. Though Captain "Irish" makes a good landing, there is some slight damage which must be addressed. However, while fixing the problem, they are shot at by, presumably, some local Japanese and must take off right away. They then must land on the bomb cratered runway at Pearl Harbor.

After a successful landing at Hickam Field, they learn that Tommy's sister, who'd been dating co-pilot Bill, was injured in the attack. Part of the news is related to them by Tex, whom they don't respect from some history and the intra-service rivalry mentioned previously. They think Tex is partly to blame for Susan's condition and assume he was hiding out during the attack. They learn from the Colonel at Hickam Field, however, that Tex shot down four enemy planes (Zeros) before he himself was shot down in the action. They are then told that their new orders are to fly to Manilla, where the crew chief's son stationed, via Wake Island and asked to shuttle Tex to a pursuit wing stationed there.

On the way to Wake Island, one gets a sense of just how difficult it was in those days to find a dot on the map without the advance navigation systems and radar of today. The crew is nervous, making the navigator anxious throughout the flight, about finding the island before their fuel runs out. Of course, everyone (including the navigator) is relieved when they do. Unfortunately, Wake too has been hit and after briefly refueling the exhausted, sleep deprived crew is told to leave before an impending Japanese invasion, when all on the island is expected to be lost. Several of the Marines on the island convince Weinberg to take their dog to save it from their fate.

It is at this point that Winocki starts to become part of the crew. Once airborne, when the crew chief demands to know how a dog got onboard, Winocki says it was he that did it. Later, when the Mary- Ann makes it to the Philippines, it is Winocki who tells "Irish" that he wants to help and stay on as part of his crew. The Captain is glad, and says that first he must get rid of the dog (which he gives to the first Marine he sees, played by Brophy).

More exciting action and interesting plot-line, much of it predictable to fans of this genre, make this film continue until it exceeds two hours on screen and the good guys deliver some comeuppance and payback at the Battle of the Coral Sea. This film, directed by Howard Hawks, won an Oscar for Best Editing and was nominated for B&W Cinematography, Special Effects, and Writing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A horribly dated film but a great study in WWII Allied propaganda
davidemartin26 May 2001
I just saw AIR FORCE of the first time a few weeks ago and, um, well... I guess it's faithful to the time it was made but, man, is it full of baseless bigotry! Okay, I know that during the dark days of a world war one is not exactly interested in hearing what the enemy might have to say on an issue but it is hard to defend Hawks' whole-hearted acceptance of the anti-Japanese/America hysteria. The film falsely portrays Japanese-Hawaiians as actively attacking the American forces during the Pearl Harbor attack. No such attacks occurred. In fact, local Japanese were observed shooting at the invader warplanes! But in 1943, the policy was to support the internment camps and the myths that made them possible. Hawks was probably just "doing his duty as a patriotic filmmaker" but I don't have to like it.
10 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed