California (1947) Poster

(1947)

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Handsome but sometimes episodic history lesson with too many directions to take.
mark.waltz23 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
At first, it's a "How the West Was Won" journey of settlers heading to California (with a banjo on their knee), then it's about the gold rush. then a gambling hall, and finally a political squabble over statehood and impending civil war. And as much as it looks like a Cecil B. DeMille epic, it isn't, directed instead by John Farrow.

But, oh, what a pleasure it is to look at, starting off with a travelogue like prologue with an E.Y. Harburg song. Barbara Stanwyck makes her entrance being tossed out of town by the proper ladies and gentlemen and reluctantly being picked up by the wagon train lead by Ray Milland. He doesn't want her on it, but feisty Barry Fitzgerald sympathizes with her and takes her along in his wagon. Then, news of gold breaks, everybody scrams, and Milland and Fitzgerald are left to themselves, surrounded by the junk yard of the journeyer's furniture left behind, the west coast's first garbage dump.

It continues with an obviously dubbed Stanwyck singing a song in a gambling hall she's purchased, getting involved with ruthless Albert Dekker and alternately insulting and defending Milland while secretly supporting Fitzgerald for senator, Dekker's rival. It's the last segment that's the most interesting, a fictionalized vision of early California before swimming pools and movie stars, not to mention ski resorts, Hollywood signs, freeways and governators.

Stanwyck gets to wear some bewitching gowns by Edith Head and is alternately tough, tender and tempestuous. Wasted in a tiny role, Anthony Quinn is nevertheless handsome in his brief dance with Stanwyck, historically important to see two legendary stars together. They would share more scenes in 1953's melodramatic "Blowing Wild". Milland is grizzled enough to take away the image of him in tailored suits from past movies (even though the same year he got his ear pierced by Marlene Dietrich in "Golden Earings") while Fitzgerald gives a performance filled with wisdom, heart, and humor.

Colorfully filmed, this is still an interesting account of the settling of a land once wild, now overcrowded, yet still filled with beauty where cities have not yet risen.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"A" Picture Gloss: "B" Movie Plot!
bsmith55526 June 2007
"California" was an ambitious film from Director John Farrow and Paramount Pictures. In spite of its lavish Technicolr photography and a music score from Victor Young, it falls flat as a big budget movie.

The film is basically divided into three parts, the wagon train sequence, the arrival in California sequence and the fight for statehood sequence.

Wagon master Jonathon Trumbo (Ray Milland) is leading a wagon train of settlers to the promised land of California in the late 1840s. In one of the towns he meets "saloon gird;" Lily Bishop (Barbara Stanwyck) who is being run out of town by the ladies of the town. She asks to accompany the wagon train and wine maker Michael Fabian (Barry Fitzgerald agrees to take her along. When news of a gold strike in California reaches the wagons, the farmers catch gold fever and desert Trumbo and the train.

Later in California Trumbo arrives to find Lily in 'the employ" of ex slaver Captain Pharoh Coffin (George Coulouris) who has ambitions to take over the whole of California by blocking its bid for statehood. Trumbo recognizes Coffin and confronts him only to be beaten up by his brutish henchman Pike (albert Dekker). Although Lily loves Trumbo she still plans to marry Coffin (for his money of course).

The fight for statehood follows with Fabian representing the pro statehood side and Coffin leading the anti-statehood faction. Naturally, the pro statehood faction carries the day. Coffin attempts to force his will with arms, a blazing gun battle ensues and...................................

This movie, although it has its moments, plays more like a "B" movie, especially in the middle, than any thing else. One expects Zorro or The Cisco Kid to ride in at any moment. I mean a villain named Pharoh Coffin, come on. The shots of the wagon train are impressive (probably due to stock footage) and the shots of the landscape are equally appealing in glorious color. But the movie falls flat.

Ray Milland is not really that convincing as a hard nosed wagon master. Stanwyck, always better than her material, gives a good performance as the gold digging Lily. Coulouris' villain is melodramatic and fits more into a "B" movie than an "A" big budget feature. Dekker's brutish henchman is good, but he would have made a better Coffin than colorless Coulouris. Others in the cast include Anthony Quinn, Frank Faylen, Eduardo Ciannelli and Agentina Brunetti. To add to the "B" look of the film several "B" movie veterans appear in small supporting roles.

A better script, some casting changes and we could have had a much more memorable movie.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great epic Western with top-notch cast , brilliant cinematography and spectacular scenarios
ma-cortes27 May 2020
Epic account of how California became a state, featuring a wagon train full of settlers that joins Wicked" Lily Bishop (Barbara Stanwick) expeled from a town , to go California, led by Michael Fabian (Barry Fitzgerald) and Johnnny Trumbo (Ray Milland) . However , news of the Gold Rush scatters the caravan and subsequently taking on evil profiteers . But worse troubles are ahead : California is inching toward statehood and corrupt politicians wish other personal and mean purports .

Awesome epic Western with giant cast , gorgeous photography and wonderful scenarios . Turbulent and mighty story about an epic saga set against the background of Gold Rush and historical deeds ; covering several decades of Westward expansion in the nineteenth century--including the Gold Rush, and usual political confrontation . And of course , the building of the California State with certain politicians who want to make it their private empire ; among other epic events . The picture gets great action , expansive Western settings , shootouts , love stories , it is quite entertaining and there some some scenes still rate with the best of the West , including marvelous moments along the way . It efficiently describes an attractive panoramic view of the American Western focusing on the tribulations , trials and travels of settlers and adventurers . It's a big budget film with good actors , technicians, production values and pleasing results . Breathtakng as well as spectacular scenes such as the long Wagon Train , and the final attack sequences , among others . Particularly supreme for its all-star cast list with some actors epitomising the spirit of the early West , at least as Hollywood saw it , including the indomit wicked saloon queen Barbara Stanwick , the tough wagon train guide Ray Milland and his colleague the always sympathetic Barry Fitzgerald .And a splendid support cast as George Coulouris as the powerful storekeeper , former slaver Pharaoh Coffin , Albert Dekker , Anthony Quinn , Eduardo Ciannelli and Frank Faylen.

Impressive cinematography filmed in big screen by Ray Rennahan , and photographed in splendorous Technicolor , though it loses much of its overwhelming visual impact on TV but otherwise holds up pretty well . This star-studded, epic Western adventure is a really old style Hollywood film well directed by John Farrow . At his begining he stayed in Hollywood as a screenwriter, from A Sailor's Sweetheart (1927) through Tarzan escapes (1936). He married Tarzan's Jane, Maureen O'Sullivan, in 1936. He began directing in 1937 Men in Exile and West of Shanghai (1937). He was injured while serving as a Lieutenant Commander in the Royal Navy in World War II. After that he converted to Catholicism and wrote a biography of Thomas More, a history of the Papacy, a Tahitian/English dictionary and several novels. And directing notorious films as Wake island , This kind of woman , Hondo , Calcuta , China , The big clock , Red, Hot and Blue ,Alias Nick Beal , Beyond glory , Hitler Gang and several others . He collaborated in the writing of several of his films and shared the Academy Award for Around the world in 80 days (1956). Rating : 6.5/10 , essential and indispensable watching . It's a magnificent example of the kind of old-fashioned blockbuster just don't make anymore .
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A real masterpiece in camera work
Lascar18 February 1999
In this movie John Farrow shows the great director he was. The camera work is exceptional, with scenes lasting more than 4 minutes filmed in just one take!. Although there are several of this scenes in the movie, there are other aspects to comment also. The actor's direction is superb, obtaining the most of all of them, in particular the performance of George Colouris (the villain) is outstanding. Moreover, this is not the typical western; the plot shifts unexpectedly from the line one assumes it will follow, to a very different one, and the movie maintains its coherence perfectly. A real gem.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A HUGE wagon train of farmers and misfits are heading for California when gold is discovered there. Greed brings in all types, and also brings out the worst in some.
dianefhlbsch16 September 2007
Definitely NOT a great movie, but very enjoyable, especially if one is a Stanwyck fan. Cinematography bounced back and forth from lush, to "quick, get it done" shots.

Ray Milland did not quite cut it as the hardened trail boss and buffalo hunter. But maybe that's because his character really is not-he deserted from the army for getting involved with a married woman. Stanwyck shines as the self-reliant lady gambler and flirt who has been tossed around her whole life, with a few exceptions.

Yes the movie is rather corny, but let's face it the movie industry was right in the middle of the Macarthy era and needed safe material to work with. It DID give a rather honest perspective of how many lost sight of what they really had set out for, and how others took advantage, at any cost.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
TECHNICOLOR MISFIRE...CASTING MISSTEPS...AWFUL MUSIC...CLUNKY MONTAGE
LeonLouisRicci1 September 2021
The Casting of Barry Fitzgerald as a Dirt Farmer/Politician/Saint.

And George Coulouris as a Former Slave Trader and Devil Incarnate.

Almost Ruin a Sprawling Technicolor Production.

Ray Milland and Barbara Stanwyck are Stalwart as in On Again-Off Again Romance Trying Desperately to Inject some Suspense and Intrigue in this Hopelessly Overblown Story.

John Farrow's Direction is Pedestrian with Few Flourishes that Make the Movie come to Life as it just Hops Around from One Direction to the Next.

A Huge Disappointment Considering.

The First Act with a Wagon Train that Stampedes as soon as the Word Arrives that Gold was Discovered in the Titled Territory.

The Second Act is a Gambling Hall with Stanwick and Coulouris being Infiltrated as Milland Shows Up.

Then there's Talk about California becoming a State.

The Third Act is Political and an Attempted Empire Building by Coulouris.

Buy this Time the Film has Worn Out its Welcome and Scenes Come and Go with Little Gravitas.

It just Runs its Course to the Predictably Flat Ending.

Worth a Watch with Very Low Expectations.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nothing particularly special here...
planktonrules6 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Uggh! This film starts off very, very poorly with a sappy introduction that only can be believed if you see it. I really think it best if you skip the narration and singing and cut straight to the scene at the beginning of the film where the person is taking luggage off the stage coach! Unfortunately, the horrible singing returns at the 22 and 100 minute mark--and I found myself contemplating plunging a screwdriver into my ears to make it stop and I also felt rather envious of my deaf daughter! And, speaking of singing, at about the 29 minute mark, Barbara Stanwyck sings a song in a bar. It's obvious to anyone who's seen her movies and is familiar with her voice that this is NOT Stanwyck who is singing--the voice just isn't right.

The film is purportedly about the founding of the state of California. It begins on a wagon train where Barbara Stanwyck hitches a ride after she's driven out of town for her wicked ways. Once there, she meets up with an instantly hates Ray Milland--and you know that means that eventually fall in love (old movie cliché #16). But this trip is disrupted by news of the discovery of gold and the trek west degenerates into an "each man for himself" affair! Once in California, bad-girl Barbara lands on her feet very well. She makes a fortune running a saloon/gambling den. She's also very friendly with the ever-slimy George Coulouris--a man who ALWAYS plays the most weasel-like and unsavory characters. While Stanwyck is bad, at least her gambling joint is on the level--everything about Coulouris is crooked and he is the evil boss-man who is behind claim-jumpings and killings (cliche #12). Later, the evil boss-man decides he doesn't want California to become a state, as he loves lawlessness. So much of the rest of the film consists of his paid baddies making life tough for the good folks.

So what's going to happen next? Will Coulouris' reign of terror be ended? Will Ray break Barbara's evil spirit and make this philly his own (huh?!)? Will there be any major surprises in the film? By the way, there's one surprise in this film. Not only does Ray Milland play a cowboy(!), but he gets into a fistfight! This just seemed odd in light of the sort of person the Welsh-born Milland usually played. Fortunately for the sake of realism, Milland IS beaten to a pulp in this fight! I enjoyed his acting, but just could never picture him in westerns--let alone being a two-fisted brawler! Along for the ride are some nice character actors to give the film color. Barry Fitzgerald, Anthony Quinn and Albert Dekker are welcome supporting additions to the film.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A flawed film but still worth seeing!
JohnHowardReid4 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Director: John Farrow. Producer: Seton I. Miller. Copyright 21 February 1947 by Paramount Pictures Inc. New York opening at the Rivoli: 14 January 1947. U.S. release: 21 February 1947. U.K. release: 14 April 1947. Australian release: oddly no official release date despite the fact that this was one of Paramount's prestige releases of the year. Sydney opening at the Prince Edward: 18 April 1947 (ran four weeks). 8,758 feet. 97 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: A former slave trader's plans to make California his own empire are thwarted by a moralistic army-deserter and an idealistic grape-grower.

NOTES: Stanwyck's first color film. Filmed on locations (including Sedona) in Arizona.

COMMENT: Much admired by many critics, including my colleague Barrie Pattison who swears that California is "one of the supreme achievements of mankind". I am of a lesser opinion. True, Farrow's direction is wonderfully fluid, with at least four or five extremely long, extremely elaborate and complicated one-takes. But their dramatic impact is often dissipated by a faulty script which lets Farrow down on a number of fronts: Firstly, the narrative construction is oddly episodic, with various segments separated by surrealistic chorales. Now I'm all in favor of experimentation in the cinema, but it doesn't gel here. All this extolling the virtues of California by an off-camera chorus ("Get my bible and banjo... It's California, or bust!"), doesn't always sit too well with a petty tale of a gambling hussy on the wagon train.

(Of course not all the singing is done off-camera. The wagon folks themselves render "I Should Have Stood in Massachusetts", while saloon singer Stanwyck — wearing gorgeous gowns — is expertly dubbed for "Lily-I-Lily-I-Oh" and the haunting ballad, "Said I To My Heart, Said I").

The second problem with the script is that, despite its length, characterization is so sketchy, it's hard to get involved with the principals. Milland doesn't help much. Acquits himself well enough in the action spots, true, but otherwise just glumly rattles off his lines. Stanwyck plays with more fire in her spirit, and looks mighty fetching in Technicolor, but the script gives her such threadbare cloth to fashion, it's no surprise her performance makes little impression. Ditto Barry Fitzgerald.

The one player who does come across strongly is George Coulouris who makes his Captain Coffin not only truly menacing, but even truly human. Yet even here the script tries to undermine the character (what a pity the haunting of naked feet pattering across the deck is only alluded to but once). Fortunately, such is Coulouris' skill he manages to force our interest interest upon the captain right through to his anticipated end. The other villains are distinctly minor by comparison, but Dekker and Muir manage them ably.

The script's third vice is its overly verbose dialogue. Practically all of Fitzgerald's part could go with no loss of interest or continuity, and the scissors could likewise be taken to some of the principals' exchanges, plus three or four small but unnecessary scenes.

Alas, in the print under review, Rennahan's once-lustrous color photography is now somewhat less than satisfying. Some superb images remain, however. The panning shot of all the furniture thrown from the wagons to facilitate the gold rush, for example. A flawed film, but still vastly entertaining. Superb sets, and unstintingly lavish production values help.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointed
januszlvii20 February 2022
California really disappointed me. It is without question Barbara Stanwyck's least shown Western ( and the only one that eluded me). The problem is not that it is bad movie ( it isn't), it is that Barbara ( Lily) is wasted. Barbara in westerns from the beginning ( Annie Oakley) until the end ( The Big Valley) is the reason to watch. Not here: It is. Ray Milland's ( Jonathan Trumbo) Film all the way, and he dominates the movie. One major plus is the print. I am willing to bet that Universal remastered the movie because of how crystal clear the print is. I still cannot get over how disappointed I was in this movie. I give it 5/10 stars. All for Milland and the quality of the print.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cal-ee-forn-eye-ay
JoeytheBrit23 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A film that starts out as camp as this – apple-pie and syrup homilies to the great state voiced over saturated colour shots of its natural landmarks – can only get better, and thankfully it does. Despite the improvement California never really reaches the big budget quality heights to which it aspires though. The colour looks good, and some of the cinematography is terrific, and John Farrow's direction is as reliable as it always was, but the plot is a little stale to say the least.

Ray Milland struggles to convince in a role more suited to the likes of Robert Taylor, but he gives it his best shot and is merely unmemorable rather than annoying in the role of principled cavalry deserter and wagon leader Jonathan Trumbo, who spends most of the film fighting his desire for saloon girl Lily Bishop (Barbara Stanwyck, opposite whom Milland seems to become invisible every time they share a scene) before inevitably melting into her arms in the final scene. This being a colour film, Lily often wears red, just to let us know the colour of her past and the passions lurking beneath her frosty exterior. If George Coulouris were half as colourful as his character's name – Pharaoh Coffin – an ex-slave trader intent on making California his own little kingdom, instead of an oddly insipid nonentity he might have provided a little more zip to the proceedings, but most of the bad guy antics are left to the ever-reliable Albert Dekker. The film also features a young Anthony Quinn, impossibly handsome in a latino way, who sadly has little to do other than dance, get drunk and die. Barry Fitgerald rounds out the cast as Fabian, a wine grower on Trumbo's wagon trail who allows himself to be talked into running for governor of California so that Johnny can hammer a nail into Pharaoh's, ahem, coffin.

This is old-style major studio entertainment so you pretty much know what you're going to get. Good, solid production values, some not insubstantial star power – and a story that is almost as lightweight as tiny Mr. Fitzgerald.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sad, sad film
thatbookguy28 March 2001
This film tries so hard to be a sprawling epic, and it ends up just sprawling. The hero barely registers as a blip on the radar, Barbara Stanwyck turns in a bad impression of a heterosexual heroine, the villain is a cardboard stereotype, and Barry Fitzgerald's character is too saintly to be believable with this thankless script. This western even features a stand-in horse: a photo mounted on cardboard (in one of the first scenes). It never really gets much better than that.
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Handsome Technicolor Western Epic Sparked By Top Cast, Good Story, Authentic Atmosphere
oldblackandwhite23 May 2011
This is a case where I feel like other reviewers have watched a different movie called "California" than the one I saw. The picture I enjoyed was a top-notch "A" western with an excellent cast, gorgeous Technicolor cinematography, spectacular California scenery, lively action, good pacing, and an intelligent, adult story.

At the top of the cast Ray Milland, Barbara Stanwyck, and Barry Fitzgerald, were at the peak of their careers. All three had garnered Academy Award honors within the past few years before "California's" early 1947 release. Milland was coming off his best actor award for Lost Weekend (1945), while Fitzgerald won best supporting actor for Going My Way (1944) and also got a best actor nomination for the same role! Stanwyck, a perennial bridesmaid of the Academy had received best actress nominations for Ball Of Fire (1941) and Double Indemnity (1944). "California" is a good showcase for their talents, each doing what he or she did best -- Ray the mild-mannered but hard-edged tough guy, Barry the lovable Irishman, and Barbara the hard broad who may or may not be hiding a heart of gold. Good support and stalwart villainy is provided by George Coulouris and Albert Dekker with a large cast of other supporting players and extras.

Some people can't picture Ray Milland as an appropriate western lead because of his British accent, even though it had became slight by the late 1940's when he had be living in the United States for two decades. But lots of people in the West would have had British and other foreign accents. Remember, we were and still are a nation of immigrants. Besides which Ray was imminently qualified to play westerns by his real life experiences. Having served several years in a crack British cavalry regiment in the 1920's, he was an expert horseman, and it shows by the way he sits a steed in "California". And he certainly knew which end of a gun the bullets came out of. A crack marksman, he helped his regiment win several prestigious shooting matches in his army days. Interestingly, he actually plays a professional trick shot artist in another western, Copper Canyon (see my review).

John Farrow's usual efficient direction and Eda Waren's editing keep the story moving along at a sharp pace. The script by Frank Butler and Theodore Strauss provides an intelligent, adult story with literate dialog. It gives an accurate, compelling picture of the California gold rush and the gold fever gripping immigrants to the Pacific Coast, as well as the movement for California statehood, a plot by the baddies for an armed overthrow of the government, and a torrid love triangle. As the intense, dark melodramas now known as film noir were at the height of their popularity when this western was filmed, the script endows the principles of the love triangle, Milland, Stanwyck, and Coulouris, with shady pasts. Milland's character, it turns out has deserted the Army. Stanwyck has been thrown out of every town she ever parked in for being -- shall we say charitably -- a floozy. Coulouris, villain enough as it is, has an even darker past as a slave ship captain. And he is now going slowly off his nut remembering the cries of the chained slaves and his fears they would rise up and get him. Dekker, occasionally a leading man or second lead, but more often a polished villain, is wasted here as Coulouris's former first mate and brutish henchman. Since Coulouris is always a bit over the top, perhaps "California" would have been better served if Dekker had had his role.

The script and Farrow's direction gives us just the right blend of dramatics and action. A rousing, old-time, full-bodied score by Victor Young helps move it along. Unlike other reviewers, I found the frequent outbursts of singing by both on-screen characters and an unseen chorus an asset to the picture, adding life and color and even historical accuracy. Some in this history challenged generation may not realize that in the days before people had television, computers, radio, movies, or even phonographs, they had to entertain themselves. They sang all the time, walking down the street, in their yards, in barber shops, at socials, around campfires (as in "California"), and in saloons. Even the meanest of saloons could usually scratch up some kind of band.

The costumes, sets, firearms, gun leather, lamps and other accouterments in "Callifornia" show an unusual degree of historical accuracy for a western of this era. No one has a repeating rifle, all muzzle loaders or crude breech loaders. Cap and ball revolvers are used in the closeups at least -- never mind they were not the exact models for 1849. You other gun nuts: in how many other movies have you seen a Hall breech loader? Good effort in this department.

Ray Rennahan, who did the camera work, gets credit for the unusually fine color cinematography, but with Natalie Kalmus on board as the Techniclor consultant, superb color was insured. The Technicolor Corporation required a consultant on every movie using their patented process, and Mrs. Kalmus, ex-wife of the inventor of Technicolor, was usually it. She was known around the studios as a bossy, irritating old dame, who interfered in set designs, camera set-ups, costume color and materials, prop selection, and virtually every other aspect of a color filming. She must, nevertheless, have known what she was doing. Every picture with her name on it will have muted, perfectly co-ordinated, precisely lighted, and generally superior color. After all, the studio technicians of the 1940's, as skilled as they were in black and white filming, had little experience with color. They actually needed a Natilie Kalmus, like it or not.

"California" in an A-1 Technicolor western, a visual treat and smooth, exciting entertainment from Hollywood's finest era.
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"The soft don't make it to California"
richardchatten7 June 2022
To be savoured as Barbara Stanwyck's first film in Technicolor, imaginatively staged by John Farrow in long elegant takes; the only drawback being that the shortage of closeups doesn't afford you many good looks at her gleaming red lips.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Handsome Production Values, Disappointing Results
FightingWesterner25 July 2011
Army deserter Ray Milland leads a wagon train, including woman-of-easy-virtue Barbara Stanwyck, on its way to California, only to find the gold rush in full effect and the territory overrun by scoundrels, like megalomaniac slave-ship captain Barry Fitzgerald.

The excellent photography, with equally excellent use of Technicolor, good direction by John Farrow, and Milland's brooding can't quite overcome the overly talky script, the datedness of the songs, and the fact that Stanwyck's character is quite unappealing most of the time.

However, for those of us who grew up watching Ray Milland playing old curmudgeons in various B-movies of the sixties, seventies, and early eighties, it's interesting to see him in his prime, playing a rugged leading man.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fails to Gel
dougdoepke20 August 2012
The movie is a stab at an epic western that simply fails to gel. The best part is the "moving west" scenes of wagon trains convoying across the open southwestern terrain. These achieve an epic feel that the dramatics unfortunately fail to duplicate. The screenplay itself is pretty crowded, telling the story of California's becoming a state, no less. From settlers to gold rush to saloons to political intrigue, the story is traced out mainly through Milland, Stanwyck, and Coulouris, with Fitzgerald as a salt-of-the-earth anchor.

Now, that might work, except director Farrow has little feel for the material. The various parts come across in rather limp, unexciting fashion. It's as if he's content to simply film the script without bringing its many conflicts to dramatic life. Thus, the drama is conveyed in words instead of characters. Then too, Oscar winner Milland appears either miscast or uninspired. His role really calls for a bigger personality than Milland's generally low-key wagon master. (He may have viewed a western as a comedown after his award winning role in The Lost Weekend.) Stanwyck is of course Stanwyck even though she's dolled-up to suit Technicolor filming and crowded around by the packed screenplay . Too bad the guy who could have enlivened the action remains in supporting background, namely, the commanding Albert Dekker (Pike).

Anyway, I guess I now know why this epic western remains so obscure, despite its Paramount pedigree and marquee cast.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unambitious western
funkyfry19 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Falling somewhere in director John Farrow's western filmography slightly above "Copper Canyon" (which, like this film, stars Ray Milland) and far below "Hondo", there just isn't a lot to say for good or ill about this relatively unambitious western drama. While positioning itself as a serious picture in terms of theme, it conforms in every way to standard melodrama formulas and fails to present a memorable villain or fundamental conflict. Nice technicolor photography, stylish flourishes from the director, and not even the great Barbara Stanwyck can save this film from being just slightly more than mediocre.

Stanwyck plays Lily, a much maligned singer trying to make it big in California off her legs and her pipes where all the men are trying to bring in satchels of gold. Milland is Jon Trumbo, a gambler who deserted from the army and spends half the movie hiding from them and the other half brazenly running a tavern in town. Barry Fitzgerald is third billed but basically drags the movie down into unintentional farce with his mannerisms, while on the other end of the spectrum George Coulouris is cast as an intriguingly written villain but ends up underplaying the role to death.

Farrow can always be relied upon for brief moments of misogyny like the one in this movie where Stanwyck is slapped and then shown rubbing her cheek as if she was getting masochistic pleasure from it. Generally speaking this is one of Stanwyck's duller roles from the 40s. So much more could be done with her in a western, as for example in Anthony Mann's "The Furies" and Sam Fuller's "Forty Guns." Here Farrow forces her into a rather dull 40s version of an independent woman that rings hollow.

Milland was a good western hero; he played these roles with a bit more realism and less projected "integrity" than most B movie cowboys tended to do. Unfortunately in this movie it's like he's searching for a moment to really do some acting but just can't find it. Farrow usually has a good sense of film economy but in this film it seems like the energy of a lot of the scenes is amped too high and there's not much rhythm to the film as a whole. However the reason this film is much better than "Copper Canyon" is because Milland can make better scenes with Stanwyck in this movie than he can with Hedy Lamarr in that one. This film isn't any worse than most westerns and it's better than quite a lot of them, but you just have to feel that if they had put a big more effort into the whole thing it could have been a lot better. Stanwyck is in this dull role, and you have an actor like Anthony Quinn in a role that barely exists. Meanwhile you have Coulouris who is probably the most boring actor in the movie playing the most interesting character. I think the film could have focused more on him, but it was probably written down since they couldn't get a real star.

Worthy entertainment with low expectations.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
California
CinemaSerf5 November 2023
I always thought Barbara Stanwyck had the measure of any of the men she co-starred with in westerns, and here she certainly holds her own as the manipulative "Lily". She joins a wagon train heading west, but the gold rush rumours split that up and so she proceeds to the coast where she quickly ends up owning quite a lucrative saloon. She's pretty much sharing control of the town with the odious storekeeper/daylight robbery merchant "Pharaoh Coffin" (George Colouris) when her erstwhile pals "Trumbo" (Ray Milland) and "Fabian" (Barry Fitzgerald) arrive, all amidst increasing calls for Californian statehood. Needless to say, those in power locally want the status quo - the new arrivals want something more "democratic". What now ensues are a series of cat-fights that keep this moving along well enough until, what I must admit to feeling was a bit of a disappointing denouement. Stanwyck stands out, and Fitzgerald and the rather oddly cast Coulouris are also effective. Milland, however, well he doesn't quite cut the mustard and there is way, way too much dialogue as this story takes far too long to get up any head of steam. Still, it's got a pioneering sort of spirit to it that I quite enjoyed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Piles of gold getting' bigger and bigger.
rmax3048239 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A massive gold rush takes diverse types of California, where they meet their destinies. Some find gold, most melt into the background, some run saloons, others gamble and win saloons from the others, some are pervicaciously greedy and deprive others of water, some wear sandals and lift weights on Muscle Beach, some organize a personal militia to fight against the statehood that would deprive them of their unethical power and their mountain of riches, some found loony religious cults.

Everyone except Anthony Quinn is miscast. Ray Milland is a suave Englishman, not a wandering cowboy who needs a shave. George Coulouris isn't bad as the powerful heavy and gang leader, but Barry Fitzgerald does not belong in the small part of the grizzled side kick. That's Gabby Hayes' or Walter Brennan's role. Barbara Stanwyck is miscast too. She belongs in the city, not singing in Coulouris's gambling den and bar. She gets to sing (dubbed) two or three fully orchestrated 1947-era songs.

There are a few unexpected objets trouvee in the script. Stanwyck's songs are dumb, but there is a pretty Mexican folk song, "Carmel, Carmela," sung by a tenor with a simple guitar accompaniment. And Coulouris gets a bit of sympathy from his personal background -- poverty and sadness -- during his apparently genuine proposal to Stanwyck that the ordinary bad guy is usually denied in these perfunctory scripts. I mean, after all, Coulouris was the captain of a slave ships. The horror, the horror.

And, unexpectedly, the hero, Ray Milland, gets clobbered in two fist fights. True, he's outnumbered or outweighed, but that usually doesn't stop the hero from winning, even if, in the process, he winds up with a tiny and colorful trickle of blood from the corner of his lips. The viewer also acquires a bit of incidental learning regarding the history of the state of California in the lead-up to the Civil War.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Beautiful gowns by Edith Head
HotToastyRag26 May 2018
The best part of California is the costume design. Edith Head went all out in draping Barbara Stanwyck with breathtakingly beautiful gowns. Every time she came on the screen, I gasped and exclaimed, "Look at that one!" Fashion aficionados will want to rent this one, or at least look at still pictures.

But what's the actual movie about? Ray Milland, also known as a poor man's James Stewart, stars as a wagon train leader across the vast Midwest to California. When Barbara Stanwyck is literally cast out into the street by her town, implying suspected or confirmed prostitution, Ray goes against his better judgement and lets her join the group going west. For some reason, Barbara falls for Ray even though he's not very nice to her and even slaps her after she tells him he's not going to "get what he wants".

Sprinkled into the plot is the goldrush craze, as well as political disagreements about impending statehood, but-no offense to rival politicians Barry Fitzgerald and George Coulouris-that's part of the plot isn't nearly as interesting as Barbara's clothing. Keep an eye out for Anthony Quinn in a very, very small part. Basically, he just dances with Barbara Stanwyck and then gets drunk with Ray Mi-bland. Unfortunately, even though his dance costume is very tight and shows off his best assets, he's not on screen for very long. Just think in six short years, Anthony Quinn and Barbara Stanwyck would be reunited on the screen, this time playing husband and wife in Blowing Wild.

I'm really not a Ray Mi-bland fan, so even though I love Barbara Stanwyck, I didn't really like this movie. There's a pretty cute song in the beginning, "California or Bust", but the rest of the movie feels like a subpar western. It won't hurt you, though, if you want to give it a try.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Star Chemistry Wasn't Good
The first five minutes of the movie are stunningly awful. It could have been produced by the California Board of Tourism. Full of light-hearted singing about the wonderful Golden State. It was completely out of sync, more like a start to a cheery Depression movie of the 1930's, not 1947.

Once it got going, the story was quite good. But I found the chemistry - or lack of it - between the two stars, Barbara Stanwyck and Ray Milland really spoiled the movie. Without spoiling the plot, Stanwyck is an independent "bad girl." Turn after turn, she wants nothing to do with Milland. But, of course, he loves her. And all turns out well in the end. But by the time that ending had been reached, I was at "who cares?" It might have been a lot better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Political Mixes With The Personal
bkoganbing3 April 2009
If back in 1946 when California the movie was made, let alone in the 1840s when California came to the USA via the Mexican Cession, people knew what a sprawling entity California would become, the idea of a separate California country that George Coulouris wanted to have might have been the idea might have been sold. As it is now California has about 9% of the House of Representatives and a population and budget bigger than most countries.

But we're back in the year of 1849 when trail guide Ray Milland is guiding a wagon train to the Pacific, to the newly acquired lands of the Mexican War. He's reluctantly allowed Barbara Stanwyck to travel with Barry Fitzgerald on the train. Stanwyck's been given a heave-ho out of town similar to what Claire Trevor got in Stagecoach. The two of them are mighty attracted to each other, but Milland thinks she's cheap and Stanwyck thinks he's stuck up.

It tears it for Milland when Stanwyck upon reaching California takes up with George Coulouris, a powerful, rich, and mysterious former sea captain who gained his fortune in the slave trade. He's a mean one to cross and his ambitions include nothing less than carving out a separate California Empire with himself as head.

So the political mixes with the personal as Milland fights Coulouris for California and Stanwyck.

California was a big budget item for Paramount that year, the only thing it lacked was Cecil B. DeMille directing it. The film was shot on location in Sedona, Arizona in gorgeous technicolor, courtesy of Ray Rennahan. You have to remember that Milland had won the Best Actor Oscar for The Lost Weekend the previous year and Paramount was now trying to take advantage of that.

Stanwyck loved making westerns and it sure shows here. This was Ray Milland's first starring western, he'd do a few more and not bad ones either. Fitzgerald steals the show of course in every scene he's in as the wise grape grower who sees vineyards in the Napa Valley as part of California's future.

The whole thing is nicely directed by John Farrow. And of course Coulouris will creep you out with his brand of villainy. Catch it when it's broadcast.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A love affair, during the time California became a State.
skimari14 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I don't particularly like westerns. I am usually bored with their macho heroes and their stereotypes. In "California", however, stars my all-time favorite actor, Ray Milland, so I wanted to see whether he is as good in this genre as he is in romantic comedies, adventures and dramas. Not to my surprise, he proved to be much above the typical western hero. He is realistic and effective, without excessiveness, mannerisms or gimmicks. What I consider one of the best westerns, "A Man Alone", is played and directed by Ray himself...

Returning to California, it is an epic movie, a large scale production, in glorious color, rich in costumes, settings and extras. It covers important historical ground, including the 1848 mass migration, the gold rush and the political struggles that led to the incorporation of California to the United States. All this is the background of the tumultuous love-hate relationship between Trumbo and Lily, Ray Milland and Barbara Stanwyck.

One cannot find fault with this movie: It is aptly directed by John Farrow, the music score by Victor Young is memorable, the script, in the 98 minutes duration of the movie, gives a balanced account of the personal story and the ampler historical events of the time, while a plethora of talented character actors contribute to its authentic touch. My only objection is the folklore singing at the movie's opening sequence, which could well be omitted, and the same goes for other singing interludes as well as the songs, supposedly sung by Barbara Stanwyck, all of which interrupt the action. Maybe the Studio heads imposed them, as a sort of lyric accentuation, but they actually steal valuable time that could be used for better character development.

As for the two stars: Although very beautiful in her own way, I think Barbara Stanwyck is not cut for period roles, her type is not that of the traditionally classic beauty. Also her acting in the first half of the movie is more aggressive than required. Ray Milland, on the other hand, has the correct approach of the man who does not trust women, after a previous involvement that made him desert his post in the army. Their mutual distrust causes a fierce antagonism, and they go to extremes to conceal their true feeling for each other. Of course, love finds its way in the end and the final scene is very tender. Trumbo must pay his due to the army, and Lily is ready to wait for his return, for as long as it takes. They are both charismatic actors, and if the movie concentrated more on them and less on the "epic" side, it would have been immensely richer. Nevertheless, the movie is very much worth seeing and great entertainment.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Barbara Stanwyck as golddigger in California 1850 by her song and skill as gamester
clanciai24 January 2019
Ray Milland is her counterpart in this sadly underrated and forgotten gem of American westerns in the 40s, while this epic actually catches a very important historical chapter, covering the development of California from the great gold rush and pioneer invasion in the 1850s to how it became a state of the union. Victor Fleming's music adds a fresh good spirit to the film by catching the right mood of the pioneer and golddigger songs. Barbara Stanwyck is as always outstanding and rises from the mud she is thrown into from the start to the usual brilliance of a leading lady not to be trifled with. Of course, although they are enemies from the beginning and practically through the whole film, you know from the start that Ray and Barbara will end up together, and the main interest of the film is to see how.

The best part of the film is the beginning, the pioneering trail suddenly changing character as gold is discovered, and the election scenes in the end. Barry Fitzgerald is always enjoyable, although he always makes the same character, but at least it is reliable as an asset and thoroughly enjoyable. Anthony Quinn turns up in a crucial stage and adds to the story, there will even be some shooting eventually. It's not a regular western at all but very interesting as especially an refreshing and glorious chronicle of Californian history.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
shallow, primitive, formulaic and boring
rightwingisevil12 November 2013
this 1947 production is so boring to watch with shallow screenplay, bad scenario, elementary directing and, bad acting. the irritating sound track has made this skin-deep film more like a musical. this film at first tried to portray and beatify the endless pioneering wagon trains from the east to the west combined with annoying choirs sound track praising how beautiful California is, then once the scene turned up in California, it suddenly changed into a greedy and ugly political feud of two parties, one for statehood staying with the union, one wanted to become independent and became an empire itself. those characters played by so many actors and actresses, none of them are likable. the shallow and predictable storyline also made the viewing such a painful experience. there's nothing to be praised about or brag about.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dense narrative, visually brilliant, perfect cast; above average; even the songs are bearable
norbert-plan-618-71581325 December 2022
Wonderful western and superb discovery. The film contains its share of phoned-in scenes (the relationship between Barbara Stanwyck and Ray Milland) and predictable scenes, but everything flows naturally. The film also contains interesting historical elements (the birth of California), a magnificent Technicolor and a set of secondary characters more developed than the average: Barry Fitzgerald as a philosopher who quotes the Bible and common sense, George Coulouris as a feverish character and a touching lover, Anthony Quinn in a very short but substantial role.

As for the character of Ray Milland, he is not the standard western hero. He is often beaten (kicked). He is a victim of events and is not the driving force of the story. But his character works, thanks to his past and thanks to Barry Fitzgerald!

The film shows very well the mediocrity of the prudish through the way they treat the independent and ambitious Barbara Stanwyck. Barbra Stanwyck is luminous and her relationship with Ray Milland throughout the film remains interesting from beginning to end, even if it is very phoned in and even at the limit of the ridiculous. But finally it works and when it ends the spectator is only more satisfied.

The film is free of any sentimentality. This makes it an amazing film that progresses quickly, densely, and in 97 minutes. The film has very rich and above average dialogues that serve both immediately in the scene, but also carry a very interesting subtext.

John Farrow obviously loves sequence shots: the film is full of them. They generally serve the situation and the plot very well by bringing a certain tension while being fluid or natural.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed