The Woman on the Beach (1947) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
51 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Flawed but worth seeing
mlzafron17 February 2001
`Woman on the Beach' could have been a much better film; that's the tragedy of it. There's meat in this soup of a movie-mainly because of the performances of Charles Bickford and Joan Bennett. But the rest of it is awfully weak, including, somewhat surprisingly, Robert Ryan. The main failures are the screenplay and the score. The latter can be forgiven, although it's so heavy as to be intrusive, but the former is full of holes that leave the viewer baffled.

I've seen the film three times now and I'm still trying to figure out what exactly happened to Ryan in his career during the war (Navy? Coast Guard? As a previous reviewer here suggested, it's weirdly unclear what Ryan's duties were before and after the war) and what is supposed to be wrong with him.

The secondary characters seem to have wandered into the noirish landscape from a Ma and Pa Kettle film and frankly I'm not all that surprised that Ryan seems ambivalent about marrying good girl, Nan Leslie. Renoir doesn't seem to have known just what genre of a film he was making. We go from the woman's film to film noir to hokey comedy and back again. Irene Ryan is wildly out of place and her performance is over the top in the worst kind of way.

But the gems in this film are Bennett and Bickford. Their characters' seamy, violent, sado-masochistic relationship is riveting and you can't help but wish that Renoir had spent more time focusing on it and less on the antics of the Wernecke brood. Joan Bennett usually needed good material (`Scarlet Street', `The Reckless Moment', `The Woman in the Window') to shine, but she does quite well here, particularly in her scenes with Bickford. There's also a wonderful moment where Ryan is beginning to realize that she isn't quite the put-upon little woman he thought she was. Her reaction is worth suffering through scenes about chocolate cake and the decorations at the coast guard station.

Charles Bickford is fabulous as the blinded, bitter and jealous artist, easily outshining the usually excellent Robert Ryan, who appears merely dazed and confused. This was the film that got me interested in Bickford's career. I've yet to find the movie where he isn't excellent.
46 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why can't I forget this? Renoir, let me go!
tonyglad16 June 1999
Although the screenplay is pretty dreadful, though based on an interesting idea, and the dialogue mostly either flat or silly, this film still shows Renoir's mastery, particularly in the purely visual field. It still stays with me in flashes, from nearly a lifetime ago. In addition to the director, that fine actor Robert Ryan, with almost nothing to work with, creates a strong impression. Definitely worth seeing with a fair amount of tolerance.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Striving for psychological depth, and getting halfway there
secondtake2 May 2014
The Woman on the Beach (1947)

An interesting psycho-drama. The plot is a contrivance, limited to one general scene on an ocean beach, where a soldier (Robert Ryan) is struggling with terrible memories of the war. He is apparently in love with one woman but then he meets a far more beguiling and mysterious woman (Joan Bennett), already married to a man who has recently gone blind.

So there are the four characters. Each is loaded with qualities that are plain to see and that guide their decisions in extreme ways. Ryan, as an actor, is not to everyone's taste, but he has grown on me over the years. The stiff posture and equally stiff verbal delivery is laced with feeling, like he's constantly wound up too tight. That's perfect here for a man still tormented by violent dreams and uncertainty in his lonely life.

Bennett plays a kind of woman who isn't quite femme fatale because she isn't quite manipulating Ryan without his knowing, but she has a sinister look and tone to her voice that's terrific. It turns out she hates her husband, not having to do with his blindness, but because he's cruel to her. So it naturally occurs to both Ryan and Bennett in different ways that the blind husband might be dispensable somehow, even if neither is quite prepared for murder.

The husband is given an earthy, almost admirable quality that is wonderfully at odds with how he treats Bennett. And the fourth leading character, the sweet woman who is slowly seeing Ryan slip out of her future, is the one symbol of straight forward simplicity and honesty.

There are scenes along the cliffs, on the stormy waters, at night in the grasses, and in a shipwrecked hull. You feel sometimes that it's almost a play, scripted tightly (too tightly) and staged in a limited physical world (with even the ocean scene seeming constrained in space). But this works, in a way, because you know it's a study of sorts, not a slice of real life. The one real flaw is having the blind man just too able to walk and do things without his eyes, never stumbling, never missing by an inch something he's reaching for.

This movie was a surprise in many ways. I haven't seen one quite like it, and Ryan and Bennett are really both vivid and strangely deep. If the end leaves you unsatisfied, you're not alone. It's too easy, and it shows no psychological insight after all the probing and groping prior. Even so, it's strong enough to work as a stylized piece, an artifice with bits of truth tucked in the edges.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Leonard Maltin HATES HATES HATES this movie...
AlsExGal15 March 2017
... and only gives it 1.5/4. Well Mr. Maltin is like any other critic - a useful tool as to what might be good or bad, but in this case I strongly disagree. It walks on the wild side where most American films did not tread in 1947 unless you were making a full-out noir with people who lived on the underbelly of life.

But this film has an American coast guard officer suffering from PTSD from his wartime experiences as a protagonist (Robert Ryan as Scott), back before they knew what PTSD was and just called it shell shocked. Scott is engaged to marry machinist Eve (Nan Leslie), but then he runs into Peggy (Joan Bennett), who is collecting fire wood near a beached wrecked vessel while he is riding his horse on the beach one day.

He goes back to her beach house where she lives with her blinded husband, Tod (Charles Bickford), a great artist before his blindness, which was caused by some rough sex and broken glass??? with Peggy, so Peggy feels responsible and trapped and Tod likes it that way. Exactly HOW Peggy could accidentally do what she did is unexplained but insinuated, and I assume is completely explained in the novel from which the screenplay is adapted.

The point is, Tod knows Peggy is attracted to Scott, and he seems to enjoy toying with both of them at dinner, yet invites Scott to return to visit them. Peggy and Scott share their unhealthy obsession with past demons, and to Scott this is more attractive than healthy all American Eve. In fact, he fails to show up for their wedding with no explanation, no apology. She has to come to him to get anything close to "Gee whiz I'm sorry".

On top of Scott's PTSD, he becomes obsessed both with Peggy, who understands him and doesn't try to "fix" him and his belief that Tod is really not blind. You see, Scott knows Peggy will leave Tod if it can be proved Tod can see. Tod does seem to follow light, is adventurous in where he is willing to wander alone, and seems to be looking people in the eye when he could not if blind. Can Tod see, and how far is Scott willing to go to prove he can? Watch and find out.

Ryan is always good as the troubled complex soul - you'll never see him play Santa Claus in these old films, but at least you can understand his character. As for Charles Bickford? He was always a giant talent who let his bluntness and temper get in the way of his career. Here he uses that bluntness and temper in his performance. This is probably the biggest role he is in this late in his career, and his characterization of the enigmatic painter is terrific.

I recommend this experimental and odd little film.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
uneven Renoir noir
blanche-217 August 2007
Joan Bennett is "The Woman on the Beach" in this off-center 1947 film also starring Robert Ryan and Charles Bickford. Directed by Jean Renoir, it apparently was badly edited by RKO; thus, it sometimes felt to this viewer as if large sections were omitted.

Robert Ryan plays Scott, a Coast Guard officer with post-traumatic stress from the war. Psychologically, he's a little off balance. I suppose saying "Robert Ryan" and "a little off balance" is saying the same thing, given the roles he played, but there we are. He's set to be married to a lovely woman, Eve, (Nan Leslie), and in fact, urges her to marry him even sooner than planned in an early scene. A few minutes later, he's madly in love with Peggy (Bennett), whom he sees collecting driftwood on the beach near an old wreck. Her husband Tod, it turns out, is a great artist, now blind from a fight with his wife. The two of them have a fairly sick relationship, with Tod apparently tempting Peggy with good-looking young guys to see if she'll cheat on him. At one point during dinner with the couple, Scott passes a lighter across to Peggy and Tod head turns as the flame passes him. When Peggy walks Scott out of the house she says, "No, Scott, you're wrong." So Scott, somewhere in a cut out section, became convinced that Tod can see, tells Peggy, and feels that Tod failed the test. But you have to fill that in because it's not in the movie. It doesn't occur to him, I suppose, that Tod felt the heat of the light. Finally, Scott takes Tod for a walk along the cliffs, determined to find out for once and for all if he can see or not.

The film holds one's interest because of the direction, atmosphere, and performances, but things seem to happen very quickly. Eve complains to Scott that he didn't stop by the night before - which she considers a sign that they are drifting apart - and he tells her that he shouldn't be married. In the film it seems like that happens within 24 hours from the time he wants to get married immediately. Fickle. One suspects another cut.

This is a film about becoming free of obsession, and though some found the end ambiguous, it did seem clear to me that there was some resolution. The three leads are excellent - Bennett and Bickford play a couple with a strong history that has led to a love/hate "Virginia Woolf" type of relationship along with infidelity on her part; Ryan, looking quite young here, is handsome, sincere and gullible as a man who, while trying to break free of his demons, walks into a situation that feeds on them rather than resolves them.

With a more judicious cutting, "The Woman on the Beach" could have been a really fantastic film, with its psychological underpinnings being far ahead of their time. As it is, it's still worth watching, though if I'd been Renoir, I would have been plenty angry at RKO for what was done to this movie.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Muddle
dougdoepke5 April 2012
A Coast Guard officer gets involved with a strange woman and her blind husband.

Small wonder Renoir went back to France after this Hollywood misfire. I don't know what the backstory is but the movie's a mess, great director or no. The problem pretty much begins and ends with a screenplay that makes next to no sense. Start with motivation-- is Peggy (Bennett) a loving wife who simply strays, or maybe she's just a nympho addicted to sex, or even a masochist who likes pain; or maybe even a woman deeply in love with Tod (Bickford). Unfortunately, there're reasons for any and all of these, thanks to the meandering script.

Then again, considering how changeable human emotions can be, maybe the options are not as mutually exclusive as first appears; maybe Peggy is just really mixed up. Still, it would take a far better script to effectively work out that particular pathology whatever it is. Here, options are simply dumped together into an incoherent jumble. Unfortunately, Tod's character is similarly mangled-- try figuring out, for example, how Tod and Scott (Ryan) really feel about each other. But there's no need to repeat the points other critics have enumerated.

Then there's the staging. In particular, consider the following-- a half-blind(?) Tod tumbles from a 100-foot rocky cliff with only minor head scratches; in a rocking little boat, Tod and Scott stand stock still as the seas rage beside them; at the same time, the two enemies survive after hours of clinging to the roiling wreckage. To me, all of these staging fiascos could be made more credible with better planning.

Fortunately for the movie and us, there are arresting visuals to focus on— the opening nightmare is a stunner, along with the wrecked ship on the beach. Renoir also creates an intense fantasy-like atmosphere with the foggy beach and the ship's grotesque skeleton. Then too, Ryan and Bickford make convincing hard-nosed adversaries. But these upsides are unfortunately not enough to salvage the overall result.

Considering Renoir's previous successes, especially with the lyrically impressive The Southerner (1945), I'm guessing the studio had a dead hand in (mis)shaping the final cut. But, I guess it's also possible that the director-writer was trying to bring some European sophistication to a moody love story that just doesn't work. But whatever the ultimate reason, the movie remains a disappointing muddle.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Go ahead and say it... I'm no good"
ackstasis28 December 2008
By 1947, Jean Renoir, at least indirectly, wasn't new to the American film noir style. Two years earlier, Fritz Lang had released the first of his two Renoir remakes, 'Scarlet Street (1945),' which was based upon 'La Chienne / The Bitch (1931)' {the second film, 'Human Desire (1954),' was inspired by 'La Bête humaine (1938)'}. 'Scarlet Street' notably starred Joan Bennett in a prominent role, which makes it interesting that, despite allegedly disliking that film, Renoir himself used her in his own Hollywood film noir, 'The Woman on the Beach (1947).' It's a visually-magnificent film, with photography from Leo Tover and Harry Wild (the latter of whom shot 'Murder, My Sweet (1944)' and 'Macao (1952)') that perfectly captures the mystery and eerie calm of the beach-side setting, frequently swathed in gentle clouds of mist that foreshadow the ambiguity and uncertainty of the story that follows. When we first glimpse Joan Bennett on the fog-swathed coast, collecting driftwood at the wreck of a grounded ship, she really does look ghostly and ethereal, a premonition that may or may not be real.

Robert Ryan plays Scott, a coastguard who suffers from regular night terrors concerning memories of a war-time naval tragedy, when his ship was presumably torpedoed. His dream sequences are gripping and otherwordly, recalling the excellently surreal work achieved by Renoir in his silent short film, 'The Little Match Girl (1928).' During his nightmares, Scott imagines an underwater romantic liaison, which, before he can get intimate, unexpectedly blows up in his face; this is an apt indication of the events that unfold later in the film. Scott is engaged to marry the pretty Eve (Nan Leslie), but his attention is soon distracted by Peggy (Joan Bennett), the titular "woman on the beach." Peggy is married to Tod (Charles Bickford), a famous blind artist who is still coming to terms with his relatively recent affliction. At just 71 minutes in length, 'Woman on the Beach' feels far too short, the apparent victim of studio interference. Scott is obviously enamoured, and later obsessed, with femme fatale Peggy, in a manner than suggests Walter Neff's fixation with Phyllis Dietrichson, but the motivations behind his actions are inadequately explored and explained.

Perhaps as a result of the studio's trimming of scenes, many plot-twists in the film seem somewhat contrived. Scott's extreme determination in proving that Tod is faking blindness feels so incredibly illogical – why, indeed, would Tod even consider such a con? Many wonderful scenes are severely hampered by the story's lack of exposition. In the film's most dramatic scene, amid the choppy waters of the Atlantic, Robert Ryan displays a frighteningly convincing rage that borders on pure psychosis, a quality that Nicholas Ray exploited five years later in 'On Dangerous Ground (1952).' However, because Scott's obsession and emotional transformation had previously been explored so sparsely, the sequence feels, above all else, out of context. The performances are nevertheless solid across the board, with Bickford probably the most impressive. Bennett's character is tantalisingly ambiguous: throughout the film, she slowly reveals herself to be nothing but a greedy tramp, though Scott insists on treating her as a tormented victim of abuse. The ending offers little in the way of resolution, reaffirming the sentiment that perhaps this film isn't all there.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting Melodrama That Never Quite Catches Fire
shepardjessica-117 April 2005
Jean Renoir was a fascinating director, but this one has holes in it, despite a classic "beach" mood. Robert Ryan, one of our most underrated actors, looks perfect but seems miscast in this one. Joan Bennett (I've never quite gotten her appeal) seems lost, although she was perfect in the two Fritz Lang films (Scarlett Street & Woman in the Window). Best performance = Charles Bickford as the blind painter-husband. I know there were problems with editing this at the time, but I kept hoping for more.

A 6 out of 10. Too much blasting music, but great cinematography. Irene Ryan (Granny Clampett) has a supporting role, and I believe this is the first film I've seen her in. A great director, but I just couldn't grab onto this film.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Even hacked down, Renoir's haunting noir falls just short of a masterpiece
bmacv2 September 2002
Auteur of one of the supremely great works of world cinema, La Regle du jeu (Rules of the Game), Jean Renoir, like so many other European masters, found less than a stellar career in Hollywood. Though several of his French films were remade as American noirs, he directed but one installment of the cycle himself: The Woman on the Beach. And, though routinely butchered by the studio before release, the movie soon establishes itself as something quite out of the ordinary – in fact, something close to extraordinary.

After recuperation from physical and psychological trauma during the war, Robert Ryan finds himself stationed at a sleepy Coast Guard outpost on the California coast. He's restless and diffident about his upcoming marriage to a local girl. One day on the fog-shrouded strand he encounters a beautiful woman (Joan Bennett) gathering driftwood. He walks her back to her beach shack where a two-edged friction starts to develop. Suddenly in walks her husband (Charles Bickford), who was blinded by Bennett in a drunken accident years before; though no longer able to work, he's still reckoned the greatest painter in the world. (Renoir's father, of course, was the impressionist painter Auguste Renoir.)

Ostensibly glad to have a guest, Bickford insists on Ryan's promising a return visit. But as the flickers of attraction he feels toward Bennett kindle into lust, Ryan begins to wonder if Bickford is really blind, or as blind as he claims; he also starts to chafe at being drawn into the murky and perverse games the couple seems to enjoy playing. Determined to prove once and for all that Bickford is sighted, he one day leads him nearer and nearer the edge of a bluff....

Like Fritz Lang's Clash by Night (which also starred Ryan), The Woman on the Beach deserves its noir label more from disturbing mood and freighted ambiguity than from its storyline (it's by no means a conventional suspense drama). He inspires his principal cast to superlative performances, especially Bickford (in a role reminiscent of Nabokov's Laughter in the Dark). Bennett, one of the early icons of the noir cycle, attracted the attention of two other illustrious European movie-makers, Lang and Max Ophuls. But Renoir may have directed her in the finest work of her career as this self-described "tramp" embroiled in a marriage kept together by hate as much as love. And there's Ryan's signature blend of short-sightedness and roiling anger, which he has done elsewhere, but nobody save maybe Brando did more convincingly.

The unusual score, too – by the German Communist `serious' composer Hanns Eisler – betokens that this production's ambitions are very high indeed. If The Woman on the Beach falls just short of `masterpiece' status, blame must fall on RKO for meddling with what Renoir delivered, fretful that situations and innuendos that Europeans regularly took in their stride might be too naughty for Americans – those Americans who had, after all, just fought and won a war. Even hacked down to a measly 71 minutes, Renoir's vision keeps its haunting, incantatory power.
52 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Dangerous Love Triangle
seymourblack-16 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There must be many movies that arrive on-screen in a different form to what was originally envisaged but few can have undergone as radical a transformation as this psychological drama which was based on Mitchell Wilson's 1945 novel "None So Blind". Following negative audience responses to its previews, RKO insisted on substantial amounts of re-editing and re-shooting which resulted in an end-product that contained certain passages that became surreal, elliptical or somewhat oblique. Perversely, however, these qualities proved to be entirely consistent with the mysterious, enigmatic and unpredictable natures of its main characters and so made the final version both offbeat and interesting to watch.

Lieutenant Scott Burnett (Robert Ryan), who works for the U.S. Coast Guard, is haunted by recurring nightmares that are a legacy of his wartime experiences and is also engaged to Eve Geddes (Nan Leslie), who's the daughter of a local boat builder. When he's carrying out one of his daily beach patrols on horseback, he meets a woman called Peggy Butler (Joan Bennett) who's collecting wood from the remains of an old shipwreck. As they talk, she immediately senses his torment and suggests a strategy that might help him to come to terms with his demons. A bond quickly develops between them and when Scott meets Peggy's husband, Tod (Charles Bickford), who's a famous artist who'd had to give up his work after losing his sight, he finds that the retired painter is keen to get to know him.

When they all have dinner together at the Butlers' beach-side house, it soon becomes apparent to Scott that the married couple have a rather strained relationship and Peggy later tells him that she only stays with her husband because of the guilt she feels about having been responsible for accidentally blinding him during one of their many drinking sessions. Scott, who later becomes aware that Tod beats his wife, also becomes convinced that the painter isn't actually blind and decides to free Peggy from him by proving that she has no reason to keep feeling guilty about the accident that deprived Tod of his career.

After becoming infatuated by Peggy, Scott cruelly neglects his fiancée and decides to test his theory about Tod's blindness by taking him to the edge of some nearby cliffs and leaving him there to make his own way back. This stunt and a later one, during which he tries to kill Tod, don't end in the ways that he'd hoped but matters eventually come to a head when Tod resorts to a very desperate and spectacular way of freeing himself from his past and his obsessions (viz. his painting and Peggy).

The three main characters in this story are full of contradictions and obsessions that make them fascinating and bewildering. Robert Ryan, in a very intense performance, is extremely edgy, brittle and troubled as a man who knows that he's still unwell despite having been discharged from a military hospital after having been declared cured of his mental and physical injuries. Joan Bennett is tremendous in a role that required her to be consistently ambiguous in terms of what she says and does and Charles Bickford very subtly reveals the different facets of Tod's character and the complex nature of his relationship with Peggy.

The bleak, isolated surroundings in which this drama unfolds contribute strongly to its unsettling atmosphere and its stormy weather and crashing waves powerfully symbolise the intense passions that are released within a love triangle where intentional duplicity and the nature of a complex relationship, provoke a vulnerable man into behaviour that's both murderous and self-destructive.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Soggy Psychological Drama
wes-connors15 August 2007
Joan Bennett is "The Woman on the Beach", caught between her blinded husband Charles Bickford and their Lieutenant friend Robert Ryan. Or, maybe not… I couldn't figure out what was going on, though the actors try their best. The film keeps you wondering what motivates the three principal characters. Far too much is hinted at, and far too vaguely. As far as I'm concerned, the result is unsatisfying. I don't understand the imagery in the beginning, and I certainly can't figure out what I'm supposed to deduce by the ending. Some of what goes on in between is nice looking.

You'll wonder, where is the rest of the movie?

***** The Woman on the Beach (6/2/47) Jean Renoir ~ Joan Bennett, Robert Ryan, Charles Bickford
23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautiful film noir.
jakob_3430 May 2000
This is an odd attempt by the great Jean Renoir to make a film noir. The script is not so good, but visually this film is dynamite, with wonderful photograpy by Leo Tover and Harry J Wild. Renoir did extensive retakes of many scenes, but was unable to get it right, unfortunately the film was severly cut by RKO for being too sensual and provocative. Whats left is great, a tormented husband, his unfaithful wife and her lover, who isnt convinced the husband is blind. The story is made dramtic by Renoir, and his careful direction makes the rather badly written characters interesting. The acting by Robert Ryan and Joan Bennett is very exellent, and Charles Bickford is both brutal and sensitive as the husband. The film has dramatic music by Hanns Eisler and despite having laughable dialogue in some scenes it is definately worth watching. The work of a great cinematic artist.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
AN EMBITTERED CLASSIC NOIR...!
masonfisk2 October 2019
A film noir from 1947 starring Robert Ryan, Joan Bennett & Charles Bickford. A coast guard officer is tormented, often taking long horse rides on a beach near his command station to whittle away his dire thoughts but one day he comes across a woman whiling her day away in front of a beached ship. It turns out she is the wife of an esteemed artist (who's now blind) who is stuck in a loveless, abusive marriage which intrigues the military man (even though he is promised to another). He believes the artist's impairment is a front which he tries to use to his advantage to take the unhappy woman away from him. A misguided desire has him at the point where he calls off his marriage & to make plans to take the hated husband on an ill fated boat ride during a storm where he hopes to make his fateful move. The last American film by Jean Renoir (The Rules of the Game/The Southerner) was hampered by a poor test audience & months of reshoots which by the looks of the final product feels about right since it essentially feels like a compromised classic but still deserves some attention just by the justified notoriety of the filmmaker.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Renoir at low tide.
st-shot15 November 2010
The distinguished French director Jean Renoir beaches himself on American shores in less than graceful style with this flatly performed melodramatic noir that involves post traumatic stress and infidelity. While Renoir manages to keep the suspense building with character ambiguity he does so at the expense of draining the emotional realism from them.

Scott (Robert Ryan), a coastguard officer is haunted by nightmares of a ship sinking he survived. In an attempt to move on he proposes to his girl friend who does not want to rush into things. Riding his horse along the shore one day he encounters Peggy (Joan Bennett), who lives near bye with her blind artist husband, Todd (Charles Bickford). Confused and vulnerable the pair enter into a passionate affair.

With the character of Peggy as his linchpin Renoir presents us with an ideal fatale; mysterious beautiful and dangerous. Her ambiguity is key to the suspenseful nature of the film but Joan Bennett is too icily remote and unconvincing in her passion for Scott or Todd turning her feelings on and off like a faucet. Ryan and Bickford for the most part circle each other like wounded animals challenging and looking for an opportunity to strike. Both are so bitter they make it hard to believe they have any love in them.

Given it's brief running time (71 min.) and its choppy narrative Woman on the Beach may not be the film Renoir intended. All three wax existential in brief moments of metaphorical intent but the conversation rapidly turns to rage and irrationality much of the time as Renoir employs excessive zooms and a overheated music score to give Woman a B movie style of haphazard excess. The tacked on compromise to salvage this shipwreck makes it only sink deeper.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underrated Gem
Michael_Elliott27 February 2008
Woman on the Beach, The (1947)

*** (out of 4)

This film features a very interesting story and there are a lot of great moments but at the same time there's a lot of silly and over the top moments and all of the blame has to go towards director Renoir. There's a very good love triangle going on here with a very well done mystery but for some reason Renoir lets the film slip into several over the top moments, which get a few laughs, which certainly wasn't the intent. One problem are the performances by Bennett and Ryan. Both fit their roles very nicely but each have scenes where their characters go so over the top that you've gotta wonder if Renoir was even watching what they were doing. There's also a scene near the end where it seems like Bennett was calling the shots on her own and doesn't know how to act in the scene, which turns out being rather confusing on her characters part. Bickford on the other hand delivers a very fierce and strong performance as the blind man with a temper. He clearly steals the show and acts circles around the other two leads. The film runs 71-minutes and goes by very fast and includes a couple very suspenseful scenes including one where the man wants to know if the husband is really blind and makes him walk on the edge of a cliff. Overall, the film kept me entertained but it's a shame this didn't turn out to be a masterpiece because all the pieces are there but just don't gel as well as they should.
22 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
interesting if muddled
mmfowler29 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with the reviewer who found Charles Bickford's performance as the blind painter as the most compelling and best done. But then, Tod, the artist, is the only one of the three main characters who motivations and personality are clear. His much younger, beautiful wife, played by attractive brunette Joan Bennett, is held captive by him in an emotionally and physically abusive way. At the same time, she finds herself powerless to leave him, though she finds the psychologically injured Navy vet Robert Ryan, who dreams of walking underwater toward a beautiful sea nymph who resembles her, very attractive.

Ryan's character is the biggest puzzle. We can perhaps understand the young wife's clinging to her aging, blind husband out of guilt. After all, it was she who apparently severed his optic nerve during a drunken argument some time ago, though how she managed this without a scalpel is unclear. There are no marks on the painter's face, leaving one to wonder if the cause of blindness is not psychological, or indeed metaphorical. But Ryan's murderous stupidity when he twice comes close to killing the blind painter are only pardonable under the assumption that Ryan is so stress inflicted from his war experiences that he is innocent of even a murder attempt. I didn't buy it, and nor do I see how the movie's conclusion begins to resolve Ryan's obvious mental issues.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Woman on the Beach review
JoeytheBrit29 April 2020
Emotions fizzle in Jean Renoir's brooding character-driven drama which sees Robert Ryan tread a very fine line between bad guy and good. His shell-shocked coastguard isn't particularly likeable, and he doesn't come out of things looking too good - but then neither do the other two members of the prickly menage-a-trois in which he finds himself. The object of his passion is the title character, played with sullen countenance by Joan Bennett, a young woman married to a much older man (Charles Bickford) who was a famous painter until he lost his sight. But is he really blind? And does she really love Ryan whom she kisses with eyes open? It's a sombre little tale of secrets and deception played out in a curiously cloistered world, and its ambiguity about its characters prevents it from being as effective as it might have been.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
On the beach
sol-kay17 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Shell shocked as well as water logged navy man Let. Scott Brunnet, Robert Ryan, has never gotten over his experience in WWII when his ship was hit by a German undersea mine and sank. Trying to get his head together Scott in charge of a Coast Guard station on the Atlantic coast takes daily rides along the beach on his horse and one day runs into Peggy, Joan Bennett, picking up woods from an abandoned ship wreck. During a friendly talk with her Peggy, as if she were psychic, has the surprised Scott analyzed down to the tee about his past and the hang-ups he developed from his WWII experiences.

Invited into Peggy's home Scott finds out, when he shows up unexpectedly, that her husband Tod, Charles Brickford, is a world renowned artist as well as being blind. Tod takes an immediate liking to Scott almost inviting him to stay overnight even though he has to report back to his Coast Guard station within the hour. It's then that the film takes on an almost surreal look with Scott becoming so obsessed with Peggy that he virtually leaves his totally crazy about him girlfriend Eve,Nan Laslie, at the altar and falls crazily in love with Peggy, a married woman.

The relationship between Peggy and Tod is by far the most interesting element in the film with her feeling guilty for the condition that he found himself in. We, and Scott, find out from Peggy that she go into a drunken fight with Tod and broke a bottle over his head resulting in him ending up blind. It's the fact of Tod's blindness that Peggy stayed and put up with his abuse of her feeling guilty that she took away the one love that he had in the world; eyes to both see and paint with.

The rest of the film has Scott and Tod play this weird game of chicken with Scott trying to prove that Tod isn't really blind in order to free Peggy from his clutches and keep her all for himself. Scott's actions are so outrageous that he almost has Tod killed twice in the film, by falling off a cliff and drowning in an Alantic storm, the second time with Scott almost getting killed along with.

Tod soon realizes that it's his paintings that has him going somewhat insane with his obsessive actions towards both them and Peggy and finally decides to burn them in order to set himself and Peggy free. Being blind Tod in trying to set the painting on fire sets his and Peggy's house on fire as well leaving himself homeless and penniless with only the clothes, and his car, on his back. The film ends with Peggy realizing that Tod needs her more then ever leaves Scott standard on the beach, watching her and Tod's house burn to a crisps, and agree to drive back with Tod to New York to start a new life. As for Scott we can assume that he'll now go back to Eve whom he promised to marry earlier in the movie, that's if she'll be willing to take him back in the first place.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Empty melodrama with weak script and poor dialog...
Doylenf20 March 2012
It's amazing that Joan Bennett, Robert Ryan and Charles Bickford are able to hold interest in this muddled melodrama even though the script is far from believable, the situations are trite and the ending is unsatisfactory.

The story plods along with occasional bursts of melodrama that seem forced and unreal because the script is so banal. Ryan is attracted to Bennett, whose blind husband (Bickford) seems to welcome him as a friend. She gradually falls in love with Ryan while distancing herself emotionally from Bickford with whom she has a love/hate/guilt relationship over being responsible for him losing his sight.

Jean Renoir's direction with the players is uneven because none of the characters are sharply defined. Nevertheless, Ryan and Bennett do the best they can with characters not motivated properly and Bickford acquits himself well as the bitter artist whose works keep him living in the past.

None of the elements make the story palatable or even believable. What a waste of time and talent.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Two tragic men with their lives wrecked stuck on a woman
clanciai14 February 2020
This is an amazing and unknown film by Jean Renoir which has been unjustly apparently totally forgotten and neglected. It is sticking out as his oddest production, while it was actually his one effort at making a noir. It was so bold in its dramatic scenes of intimacy, that the producers cut out large portions of it, particularly scenes between Joan Bennett and Robert Ryan of sexually too provocative character - that's why the film is so short. But there is nothing wrong with its intensity, which is breathlessly sustained all the way, it is also Renoir's most romantic film, with constant presence of the stormy sea amid suggestive coast scenery with an important wreck, and the actors are outstanding, maybe particularly Charles Bickman as the blind painter. He lives on the coast with his wife Joan Bennett when Robert Ryan as a PTSD-suffering officer comes by and complicates relationships. I was seldom so positively surprised by Renoir, I thought I had seen all his films, and here was yet another masterpiece and totally unknown at that. The film is a marvel. The drama is perfect in intensity and human passionate psychology going deep under, although there is no real climax, conclusion or settlement or logical solution, like an episode without end, but very satisfactory all the same, and the music underscores its high romantic character.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Flashes of brilliance, but it just doesn't jell.
Silents Fan22 August 2000
Robert Ryan, Charles Bickford, and Joan Bennett all give fine performances, but the parts never quite add up to a proper sum.

Why does Bennett's character, the nymphomaniac wife who blinded her artist husband (Bickford) seduce young men inside a derelict wreck on the beach? Aren't there any motels?

Why does Bickford's character, the blinded sadistic artist keep throwing young men at his wife only to become resentful when she catches them? Why does he continue to believe that Ryan's character is his friend even after he pushes him over a cliff and tries to drown him in a storm at sea?

Why does Ryan's character, a Coast Guard Lieutenant, spend all of his time riding around on a horse? Is he in the Coast Guard, or the Cavalry?

What was meant by the ambiguous ending? Did any of the principals wind up with each other, or are they all three finally free of their obsessions?
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Weirdly Inept Melodrama--but at least it's only 72 minutes long!
davejones22 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
What an inept and muddled mess this film is. The setup is interesting enough: While out riding his horse, a shell-shocked Coast Guard Lieutenant on the cusp of marriage stumbles upon a femme fatal out gathering firewood near the beached hulk of a ship. He's immediately smitten. He escorts her home (on the pretense of carrying her firewood) where he also meets her blind artist husband.

Having fallen hard for the femme fatal (as you would, of course) he sets about trying to prove that her husband isn't blind at all. In the process, he almost kills him. Oops. Turns out he was wrong about the old guy faking it. No hard feelings, though. After that, the blind artist and the lieutenant become best buddies. Until the next time the Lieutenant tries to kill him, anyway. (A fishing trip in a typhoon goes badly; you'll just have to see it for yourself.)

Oh, and our lovelorn lieutenant takes a quick 60 seconds to dump his fiancee (lucky break for her!).

Everyone's motivations and goals (with the exception of the fiancee) keep shifting so that all the characters seem either erratic or just insane--it's hard to tell. They frequently declare their mercurial states of mind: "Let's face it, I'm not well!" being my favorite. But close runners-up were, "I'm a tramp!" and "Those paintings are my eyes!"

The dialogue and the score are frequently so inept as to be laughable. I would almost start to believe this movie for about five minutes at a stretch before some freshly idiotic event or line would cause me to burst out laughing.

*Nothing* in this film is to be believed, starting with the tragic accident that supposedly blinded the painter. We're told the femme fatal threw a drinking glass in his face. Somehow, this resulted in the optic nerves (to both eyes, no less) being severed, without leaving a mark on him.

What . . . ?

No wonder the good lieutenant thought he was faking it; I wouldn't buy that story either! Plus, the actor playing the blind artist seems to bustle around the film's sets (whether he's at home, on the beach, or at the coast guard station) as if he still had 20/20.

Speaking of unbelievable, I'm stunned that there are people here rating it as some kind of masterpiece--no doubt because it was directed by Jean Renoir and has a couple of surreal dream sequences.

They're not bad (the dream scenes), but they're not all that good either. And certainly not enough to save this shipwreck. Nor is a quick cameo by Granny Clampett.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the end of Renoir's US career
lee_eisenberg17 January 2022
Jean Renoir's last movie in the US casts Robert Ryan as a coast guard officer suffering from PTSD who befriends the wife (Joan Bennett) of a blind artist (Charles Bickford). This leads the three of them down a precarious road as the coast guard officer decides to test the artist's blindness.

It's too bad that the movie failed to find an audience during its initial run. Renoir makes clever use of the coastline and scenery, while getting the best out of the cast members. He manages to create one of the most intense plots with minimal violence. This is one of the most underappreciated works of old Hollywood. Definitely see it.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unpredictable noir that doesn't quite work
FilmAlicia16 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Renoir does noir. (I couldn't resist.) This review contains minor spoilers.

In your average noir, the set-up of older man, young, beautiful wife, and younger lover would have gone in a predictable direction. In "The Woman on the Beach," the filmmakers are trying for something more symbolic, which unfortunately doesn't quite work. While the plot is intriguing, the dialogue is stilted and, at times, laughable.

Every time Joan Bennett appeared, I kept thinking of the matronly Mrs. Collins from "Dark Shadows." I didn't find her the least convincing as the female lead. To me, she's definitely femme, but not in the least fatale. (To her credit, she does have a very nice laugh.)

There are times in the story when the police would most certainly have been called in. And, at least part of the resolution of the story was predictable.

On the other hand, I thought the relationship between Robert Ryan and Charles Bickford showed the ridiculous lengths to which men fighting over a woman will go, and their interactions were the best part of the film. While it doesn't quite work, "The Woman on the Beach" is worth seeing if only because of Robert Ryan and Charles Bickford, and because it was Renoir's last American film.

Just a note that I have since seen Joan Bennett in "Scarlet Street" and "The Reckless Moment" and I take back everything I said about her above. She was awesome!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointment on the beach
TheLittleSongbird3 December 2019
Have really and even loved what has been seen of Jean Renoir's films, plenty more though to see. The story did sound really interesting on paper, as did the characters (with the right execution, they could have been quite complex and relatable). It is hard to go wrong with Joan Bennett, Charles Bickford and Robert Ryan, all three of whom did great work in other films. So with a lot of talent on board, 'The Woman on the Beach' had potential to be a masterpiece.

A masterpiece 'The Woman on the Beach' was not, sadly. Am not saying this with malice, actually really wanted to love this film but it unfortunately really really disappointed me, which is actually quite frustrating considering what it easily could have been. Seeing as Renoir was a fine director as well as the three leads being hardly devoid of talent as said, hold a good deal of Ryan's villainous roles in particularly quite high regard (i.e. Claggart in 'Billy Budd' and in 'Crossfire').

'The Woman on the Beach' is certainly not a terrible film. It looks great, the photography being both strikingly beautiful and clever in use of camera techniques which captures the setting quite vividly. The music has garnered a mixed reaction understandably, its style of composition is not one that one gets used to straightaway, it does take time, to me it smouldered in the right amount of intensity and even if the intensity did get a little too much at times it wasn't that at odds with the film's melodramatic tone. Although he is not on top form, Renoir's direction has moments of brilliance and parts do smoulder.

Both Bennett and Bickford register incredibly well, Bennett does imperiously icy as if it was made for her but the film's best performance belongs to a truly tremendous Bickford.

On the other hand, although some people say that a film being short can be a good thing (and it can be, being somebody that can have a problem if something is too long though it is always dependent on the material) this was a case of a film where being short was an undoing. To me, there was the sense that the film was intended to be longer than it turned out to be but had to have some excessive editing. As a result, the pace was erratic, the character development lacked cohesion and had inconsistent motivations (Ryan's character, one that should have been a quite meaty one, in particular doesn't make sense too often), some of the dialogue makes one cringe and the story felt like there were too many bits missing which made the very melodramatic drama feel choppy and incomplete.

Have always tried to not have a problem with ambiguous endings but this ending didn't feel just ambiguous, it actually came over as one of the worst cases of the film feeling incomplete. Nan Leslie barely registers in an underwritten role that leaves her with hardly anything to do. Ryan was a real disappoiment, this was a role that sounded perfect for him and should have been and the type of character to be potentially very relatable. Ryan however spends the entire time looking like he had no idea what he was doing.

In summary, mildly interesting but a disappointment that would have benefitted from a longer length which would have made things more complete and coherent. 5/10
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed