Jour de Fête (1949) Poster

(1949)

User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
An Introduction to Tati
Ben_Cheshire16 June 2007
This movie will undoubtedly not be what you expect. The cover-art of Tati DVDs paints him as a Chaplinesque figure, but he's much gentler than Charlie. Charlie was energetic. You'll enjoy Tati's films if you expect a gentle trip to a beautiful little village. Throughout the film you observe more than get really involved. Tati always keeps you at a distance, like a stranger.

I liked Mon Oncle the best first run through, but by that stage it was the fourth of Tati's major four pictures I'd seen, so that must have coloured my impression. The most famous is Les Vacances de M. Hulot, and M. Hulot is Tati's famous character, who appears in Mon Oncle, Les Vacances and Playtime. He doesn't appear in Jour de Fete, which was Tati's first first feature-length.

Tati is the Antonioni of slapstick comedy. There's plenty to look at in his movies, as long as you stop waiting for a narrative. None of them have real stories. They do progress, but its more the visual motifs of the various townspeople that develop throughout.

Of the four I'd say Playtime is the least friendly to first-timers.

All copies of Jour de Fete since 1995 feature the imperfect colour process it was filmed with. Its not colourised, that's just the best colour method that Tati had at his disposal in 1949 in France. Even after restoration it suffers from over-brightening and unevenness in colour, and the overall impression is of a bad colourisation, so just be ready for that, and remember this colour version wasn't available until 1995, before that there was no colour, and I think the colour's an important part of the experience of Tati's fete.

I'd recommend you rent/borrow before buying any Tati, so you know what you're getting. Probably youtube won't be the best place: any small segment of his films won't make sense on its own, they're quite slow-paced, and the characters and scenes are meant to accumulate, not be excerpted.

Happy hunting.
29 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A masterpiece of quiet humour
jwaterworth27 May 2001
When I first saw this film I couldn't get it out of my head, and put it in my all time top ten. The magic has faded a little, but this remains a classic for its strange mixture of gentle slapstick, sight gags and verbal jokes, and its beautifully atmospheric portrait of French rural life.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fast and furious, but to what avail?
sno-smari-m23 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Postman Franqouis has been introduced to the fast and effective life of the modern American postman through an educational film, making his own existence as a slow-witted, easily distracted postman of a French village appear quite pale in comparison. He is determined to follow the American example through the few resources granted him; and fast it sure goes, but how much BETTER………really?

By the time JOUR DE FÊTE was released towards the end of the 'forties, Jacques Tati had appeared sporadically in films for nearly two decades, so the medium was by no means alien to him. Even so, it was with this film that he was finally able to develop his own rhythm and style as a film-maker; even though the iconic character Mr. Hulot had still yet to emerge, this film starring the inept postman Franqouis must be said to offer a sharply flourishing Tati. The preference for the absurd to dominate rather than a coherent story is established, and also at this early point Tati makes sure to avoid audible dialogue whenever possible. Furthermore, he treats us with several clever cinematic twists and turns in his manner of choreographing the gags and situations in the film; one example occurs early on, when Franqouis is introduces to us while riding on his bicycle, clearly disturbed by a furious wasp that stalks him. We see him arrive in long-shot below us, as our viewpoint is positioned from the top of a slope. As he waves the wasp away and finally regains peace, our focus shifts to a farmer standing at the spot of the slope from where our viewpoint is located; the wasp, of course, hastily flies to the farmer to seek his attention instead, which the poor man won't deal with, so he, too, waves it away--leading it back to Franqouis, who all the while has remained in sight in the distance. This sequence, obviously funnier when seen than read, serves as a neat demonstration of how Tati was able to conjure a promising gag into a side-splitting highlight of a film, through his astute visual understanding. Granted, it is less obvious here than in his later films, one has to be more alert in order to notice the truly special moments, but this is not necessarily a disadvantage.

Yet another archetypal Tati-ingredient present in his first full-length feature, is the sheer focus on humanity. None of the characters involved are particularly well- developed, which one might miss in one way, but this makes the ultimate "message" of the film more abstract; you don't have to consider it if you don't want to. To viewers who like to engage in analyzing, however, the central theme of JOUR DE FÊTE is the same as in almost all of Tati's films; more precisely, the many alienating effects of a modern society. This was a topic which had become increasingly hot in literature and other fiction since the late nineteenth century, after the growing industrialism had defined the social-economical structures of the entire modern world, and its less pleasing aspects had begun to unfold in the consciousness among common people. The relevance of this topic is likely to endure, as I see no immediate end to the obsessive development of technology present today (good and bad). However, Tati's approach is, here as later, much less grim than that of George Orwell's futuristic novel, or even Chaplin's MODERN TIMES; while watching the mishaps of poor postman Franquois, one can't be expected to think of much else than what occurs in the moment, as he is constantly surrounded by characters of the same traditional clown-world as himself, as well as merry, often harmonious music. I suspect that the values which the film may possess in other terms than mirth- making are likely to be ignored, to a large degree, by viewers who don't give the film some thought afterwards.

JOUR DE FÊTE may not be Tati's best film; for one thing, the character of Franqouis does not, although funny, bear the kind of charisma or individuality which made Mr. Hulot into an icon. One does also get the impression that some of the gags and bits in the film, when compared to Tati's later output, would have benefited from more polish. Even so, it's definitely well worth tracking down, for a number of reasons which I've here tried to summarize the best I can. Finally, I might add that I've only watched the original version in (mostly) black-and-white, not the much later, restored and colorized one.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How lively!
Cescotto2 July 2000
At a small village fair, the postman François is watching a documentary movie on American postmen: they use helicopters, airplanes and parachutes to deliver mail, for a rapidity question. Rapidity, haste: that's what's in François's mind now. He wants to deliver mail as faster as he can into the small communities he crosses everyday…

This film has surely got an easy-going atmosphere; the gags succeed and are never totally alike. The mosquito each time comes back when you don't expect it. François riding his bike always finds something different to get you laughing! If you are French, then you'll understand villagers' peasant accent, and you won't miss to giggle! Some gags may remember you Charles Chaplin's ones, except that Jacques Tati used speech and colors, but dialogs almost escape notice, and colors aren't shocking.

I recommend this one to Chaplin's fans and other film-lovers.
22 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Plenty to hint at the genius to come from Tati
tomgillespie200223 April 2013
With Jour de Fete, French genius Jacques Tati began exploring many themes that littered his quite wonderful career. The plot is, like many of his works, very simple and is centred around one very basic idea - here the bumbling postman Francois, played by Tati. The small rural town of Sainte-Severe-sur-Indre is visited by a travelling fair, who bring joy and colour to an otherwise quiet area. Francois goes quietly about his business under the nose of the village-folk who hardly seem to notice him, apart from when they're making fun of him or getting him drunk. After seeing a documentary showing the advanced methods of postal delivery in the U.S., Francois makes use of everything around him to make his own service as fast and efficient as in America.

Clocking in at only 70 minutes, this is certainly Tati's least ambitious project, but he was very much honing his craft (this was his directorial début . His reputation as the Antonioni of slapstick is evident, as Tati feels just as comfortable watching the simple and natural interaction of the village's inhabitants in the quite beautiful rural landscape, as he is falling on his arse. Tati barely appears for the first twenty minutes or so, which is relatively laugh-free, but these early scenes are important in understanding the point of the film. By having such a calm and naturalistic opening, Francois' desperate struggle to meet the demands of a society relying increasingly on technology becomes all the more ridiculous. And there lies the satire, something that he explored more head-on and ambitiously in Playtime (1967).

Not to say Jour de Fete is without ambition, as Tati was so dedicated to his craft that he shot the film on two cameras - one with standard black-and-white photography that was the norm in 1949, and one with Thomsoncolour, a quite primitive and experimental colourising process. Thomsoncolour went bust before the film was released, and Tati was forced to release the black-and-white version that circulated for years. Tati's daughter Sophie Tatischeff and cinematographer Francois Ede managed to release the film in it's original colour in 1995, but the film looks grainy, damaged and diluted. Yet it's nice to think that Tati thought his work and vision was too grand for black-and-white, and he's right. Although this is by far the least laugh-out-loud of Tati's work that I've seen, there is plenty here to hint at the genius to come, namely the quite brilliant final few frames that has an excited child running after the leaving fair, gradually shrinking in the distance.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
silent film lives on
tomquick15 September 2001
A wholly enjoyable film, in which dialogue is incidental to the visual effect. I preferred black and white over colorized, and the French version over the slightly edited US version (with subtitles and the addition of an annoying artist who participates in colorizing). The real joy is watching Tati. Underneath all the great gags stirs the soul of the postman: officious, determined, mulelike. All expressed without words by a mustachioed rail of a man poised delicately on a bicycle. I was glad to see in the credits that La Poste had sponsored the restoration of the film. A French national treasure.
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as funny as Tati's later films, but still worth seeing
Andy-29624 December 2007
Tati's first feature film (he has made some shorts before) from 1949 is about an inept bicycle riding postman (Tati himself, of course) trying to adopt more efficient ways of delivering mail in a quaint French rural village, after watching a documentary of the American postal system. One must say first that the gags here are not as good or as funny as in Tati's later films (especially Mr. Hulot's Holiday and Mon Oncle). Still, this is worth seeing, especially in its color version (Tati was disappointed with its primitive color system, so he finally decided to release the film on black and white; the color version of the film was restored and released to the public many years later, after Tati's death). What is more striking of the movie when one sees it now is to look, even in a color that leaves much to be desired, at a rural France that no longer exists.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Enjoyable and wholly entertaining.
winner5512 May 2007
Personally, I think Tati's films are hilarious; but they're not to all tastes. Some have told me that they loathe his work. I've never figured out why, but I think it's because the character that Tati usually plays himself is so totally dead pan, so unaffected by the events around him (which he is usually causing) that many miss the more subtle comic bits happening that effectively generate his environment.

At any rate, Tati's main shtick - or at least his best known - is to take a pretentiously upright petite bourgeoisie with 19th century sensibilities and drop him into 20th century France where he must confront a society that is largely defined by the gradual eroding of those sensibilities. He usually has serious difficulties with little things like record players or radios. He's a hazard in a car, but the world's no safer when he rides a bicycle. But through it all, he never loses his aplomb, which is derived from his inner recognition that the nineteenth century was more interesting than the 20th overall.

In this film, the 20th Century is best (or worst) represented by the recurring presence of Americans. Around the time of the release of this film, the French began to worry that the American, who had liberated them from the Germans, might never go away - a worry that remains influential in French politics to this day, and with some justification. Certainly Tati's postman, on his humble bicycle, appears to be no match at all for the Americans in their motor vehicles - except that his innocent buffoonery somehow manages to get the best of them every time.

That give's the film a slight satirical edge, and one which leaves a real impression. Otherwise, we still have the imperturbable Tati, whom "neither rain nor snow nor sleet" - whatever.

Enjoyable and wholly entertaining.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
decent though not especially memorable
planktonrules29 July 2005
I gotta admit it--I'm not particularly a Jacques Tati fan. Although many consider his films exceptional, I just never felt that excited by them. However, in this film he does not play the more familiar Mr. Hulot character, and as such has a little more dialog and his humor is a little more briskly paced (as much of it is done on bicycle).

This is certainly not a bad film and I liked it more than the Hulot films. In fact, I laughed a few times when I watched it. It's just that I felt it was a very slight film--not especially remarkable but fun to watch. I'm sure than in 6 months or so, I will have forgotten most of it.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Gentle, sharp-eyed, teeming with life
jonathan-5777 June 2007
This first, non-Hulot comedy feature by France's Tati, who derives from the silent greats and can keep company with them too, centers on his gangly bicycling postman Francois, mingling with the many and varied denizens of a tiny, ancient French village. When the carnival comes to town, a tent cinema shows a movie of the hilariously high-tech, high-speed, muscleman American postmen, the insecure Francois first gets very drunk and then is seized with the urge to do his job very, very fast. Gentle, sharp-eyed, teeming with life, this isn't even regarded as one of his best, but after trying for years this screening finally brought me around to LOVING Tati. For one thing it's a love letter to bicycles, a sure sell for the surprisingly large Bike Week audience that came out to Cinecycle for this screening. For another thing there are more articulated personalities in this movie than there are in any dozen current releases; EVERYONE is acutely drawn, from the woman in the high window to the recurring character of the buzzing bug. It's a goddam tapestry of humanity, and as a result it's positively moving as well as laugh-out-loud funny. It's also very cinematic in spite of its antiquity, most obviously in some out-of-nowhere colorization, but also in compositions that pay off in a much less rigidly controlled way than any comparable American comedy - the good stuff is often happening in the corner of the frame, like a good Mad comic with a halo.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice, but unfocused
davidmvining23 May 2022
Jacques Tati followed one of the normal paths towards feature film directing: through short films. He wrote, starred in, and eventually directed a handful of shorts, culminating in his directorial debut of "School for Postmen" with Tati playing a smalltown French postman named Francois who rapidly moves through his small town to deliver the mail with his own personal flair. When he got his chance to make his feature film directorial debut, he seems to have simply decided to expand on the ideas from "School for Postmen" to the point where Jour de Fete's finale is a repeat of the short film to the point where Tati reused somewhere around a dozen shots from the short. However, the issue is that, like some other directors who rose up through the short film path, Tati didn't quite know how to build a feature length film, so his feature film debut ends up feeling like a series of shorts stitched together until he reached 87 minutes.

In a sleepy little French town, a carnival arrives one morning, greeted by the mayor, and gets ready to set up for the day's celebration. Marcel (Paul Frankeur) and Roger (Guy Decomble) begin unpacking and roping in the locals to help set up the central pole that should stand up in the center of the town square. This section is essentially narrated by the bent over old woman of the town, and it introduces most of the characters who live in the town square. There's the café owner who has painted all of his chairs. There's the woman who lives over the square and makes eyes with Roger. The issue I have with this is that this section takes about twenty minutes and it doesn't really seem to matter very much. These are side characters in the film to come, and the way this film opens it feels like Tati was setting up an ensemble piece.

This movie is Tati's, though. His character, Francois the mailman, rides in with a certain aloofness and ends up directing the successful upbringing of the pole. It's an amusing little sequence that never becomes what I might call funny, but it's enough to entertain slightly. And that ends up being the level on which most of the rest of the film works. As the festival rolls out, Francois continues on his rounds, and he ends up back at the festival getting drunk by slight deception on the part of Marcel and Roger, the gags are always slight and charming, but never hilarious. It also has a certain generic feel that distances itself from the rest of Tati's later work.

It does gain the certain luddite aspect that Tati would revisit in his later films at about the halfway point when a Francois watches a silly little promotional film about American postmen. According to this short film (which uses completely unrelated stunt footage to solid comedic effect) American postmen were regularly training to fly helicopters, getting picked up by airplanes without exactly boarding them, and driving motorcycles through fire, pumping up the idea of the "modern" way of delivering mail in contrast to Francois, who still rides a bicycle with the same busted wheel that he has to fix himself. This is the setup for Tati to essentially end his first feature length film with his first directed short film.

After another bit where Marcel and Roger have fun at Francois' expense, insisting that outrageous methods of riding a motorcycle are the right way to do things to go faster, Francois begins his day with energy and flair, flipping his shoulder sack around his body, hitching a ride alongside a truck to stamp his mail as he goes, and jumping off the back of his bike while its still moving to save himself seconds. A lot of this is re-filmed footage, though some individual shots from the short do appear here and there (including the best comedic bit in both dealing with the rope attached to a church bell), and it gives the film the kind of comedic energy the rest of the film doesn't really have. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it saves the film, but it does make ending funnier than expected.

It's not a bad first effort from Tati at all. Jour de Fete is a nice, gentle little film. It just doesn't really have a center. The first bulk of the film ends up feeling extraneous. The adventures of Francois feel disjointed. However, it's never less than nice.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hilarious
LeRoyMarko9 April 2001
«Jour de fête» is a very funny movie about François (played by Jacques Tati himself), the local postman who want to be as fast as the postmen in America. The camera work is excellent so is the cinematography. Very joyful movie too. The music score is great and it's a good way to show «l'ambiance de fête» that lives in the village.

I really enjoyed that movie. The only little drawback, and it's not really one, it's the regional french dialect used in this movie. I'm french-speaking and even I had some difficulty to understand some of Tati's lines.

8 out of 10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tati's debut is good!
I could watch this postman delivering letters to the citizens of this little town for hours. Although it's not as colorful as Tati's more popular movies it doesn't mean that it doesnt' have it's charms, it's filled with great slapstick comedy and that always works for me. I always see this being last on Tati's ranked list but so far it's my favourite of his (still have to watch Playtime and Traffic).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Okay film suffers unfairly when compared to Tati's later Hulot films
dbborroughs5 September 2006
First Jacques Tati feature film. The film concerns a festival in a small town and the colorful postman (Tati) who serves it.

Originally shot in both color and black and white, with the black and white to be used if something happened to the untried color film. As fate would have it the film remained only viewable in black and white until recently because no lab would attempt to process the color film stock. Recently the color negative was processed and edited together by Tati's daughter. The result is a film that looks like a slightly faded color postcard from days gone by. I mention this because the film feel like an old snap shot of days gone by.

The film is an okay film. Its funny and charming and very rough around the edges as befits a first feature. Its not a terrible film by an means but its not a great film. The film at times in fits and starts and there often seems to be long build ups to jokes that misfire, while some seeming throw away gags bring big laughs. Its a problem that plagued several of Tati's other films to a lesser extent, but here seems a bit more rampant because there doesn't seem to be the same rigid control Tati had in the Hulot comedies. Speaking of the Hulot films this film appears to have been raided if not for gags but for a certain visual style. I think every later film save Play Time has echoes in this one.

I like this film, but I don't love it. Its not a film that I'm going to be putting on again any time soon. Yes I will watch it again, particularly once the memory of my recent marathon viewing of the Huolt films fades.

If you're a Tati fan I'd give it a try. If you've never seen a Tati film you could try it but be warned better films followed this one.

5 out of 10
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A feast for the eye
steve-66710 February 2000
When I first saw this film I was amazed by its simplicity but also surprised by its competence. Its a cheerful and really funny piece of a great French actor and director, with some fine and really original scenes in it. This comic masterpiece about a day in a picturesque little French village, in which the postman Francois is being followed, on his daily tour, when a carnival is taking place. The speed of the modern way of life is brilliantly compared by the typical easy calm French way. Francois symbolizes this old way by doing everything slow and wrong on and off his bicycle. The little but creative stunts are really figured out for that time and are inspired by Buster Keaton and have a little touch of Chaplin in them.

The uniqueness of the film is that the story is creating itself. As the day follows we get to know the village and it's inhabitants and we are also learn a small lesson by a little old lady with a goat.

Surely a must see!
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classic Slapstick Comedy
a-wallbank9 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Jour de fête is a charming film, in which the audience remains entertained throughout with a number of comical incidents. However, the audience is also introduced to the way in which the speed of the developing modern-day world, contrasts with the small rural french village. This theme is explored by Francois, the postman, who is subjected to constant ridicule from his fellow villagers.

At the village fête Francois watches a film on the speed at which American mail is delivered. As he takes his job very seriously he becomes disheartened and feels it is necessary for him to meet this standard. However, after all his ineffective efforts to improve, he learns a very important lesson from the lady with the goat (who appears frequently throughout the film, and introduces the audience to numerous members of the village,) which is that 'good news can wait.' This is certainly a comical film, and in my opinion lovers of Chaplin would definitely find this an engaging watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Americanization
ilpohirvonen11 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Jacques Tati got an idea to create a comical postman character named Francois. He first got to try him in a short film L'école des facteurs (1947, The School for Postmen), which was first supposed to be directed by Rene Clement, who had directed a few shorts with Tati, but after Rene got sick Jacques Tati decided to direct it himself. The audience loved it and the producer asked Tati to make a full-length version of it? Instantly Jacques Tati started working on it. He used many of the same gags he had used in The School for Postmen, but added a deeper level; made the film more personal, symbolic and allegorical.

When France was occupied by Nazi Germany during WWII, Jacques Tati decided to go live in a small village. He promised to the people that if he'd keep making films after the war he would come back to the village to make a film. Well, after the war was over he kept his promise. This is one of the main reasons what why this film was successful; most of the people who acted in it were actual citizens of the village, they were the same people who helped Tati during the war. Jour de fete was made with an incredibly low-budget, basically the cast and the crew worked without salary, they decided to make the film and if it would make money they'd get it. So the cast & crew was very close and in it with their hearts.

In Jour de fete the peace of the small village is broken by aliens - the market people. The people who come to the village try to change it, bring something new to it, infiltrate to it. This is allegorical to Jacques Tati's earlier situation, when the Germans came to France, occupied it and changed it. It's a film against imperialism, this is one way too look at it. But there are several more interpretations and things to look at Jour de fete.

The other is the Americanization of France (and the rest of the world). Many film historians have researched how The Marshall Plan affected cinema; it had the strongest impact on Italy, but many state that the deepest study and influence can be seen in Tati's Jour de fete. Well of course the people who come to the village can represent this and globalization, but the most obvious reference is when Francois starts to compete with the Americans. This is quite a melancholy sequence in Jour de fete (Jacques Tati was always very good in combining melancholy and hilarity); the villagers decide to water Francois drunk and after that show him a documentary about American postmen whose mail work much better, they can post letters and packages much faster with airplanes and helicopters. After seeing this Francois feels the need to try compete with the Americans - starts delivering the mailings much more faster and the villagers joke at the expense of him.

This is a hilarious sequence where Francois hardly tries to work as fast as the Americans but just ends up losing the control of his bike and destroying mailings. Many have written long studies based on this one sequence. Jour de fete is basically a tribute to the burlesque comedy, to the American masters that Tati admired; Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd. In this sequence Jacques Tati makes some clear references to The General (1926) a film by Buster Keaton. In The General Buster Keaton loses the control of his train, in which his girl is in. He starts running after it just as Francois does after his bike. The scene where Francois just almost gets the bike is taken directly from The General, when Keaton runs through the woods and just almost catches the train.

Jour de fete of course isn't just a tribute to these American masters; Jacques Tati was bored at only seeing American films like this, he wanted to make a French one and in the posters of Jour de fete he challenged the people to support French cinema instead of American. The scene where Francois tries desperately to erect the French flag at the center of the village is very symbolic; Jacques Tati tries to erect the flag of French cinema to the American ground (burlesque comedy).

In addition to the deep content of the film it's aesthetically gorgeous. Jacques Tati decided to make the first French color film, but because he wasn't sure of the technique they used two different cameras: one black-and-white and one Technicolor. Unfortunately they couldn't make it work in the laboratory and had to use the black and white version, which Jacques Tati didn't like. After his death his daughter Sophie Tatischeff made a new restored version with the colors his father wanted. This allows us to see it in its original form and I think it really needs to be seen in colors. Because Tati planned it to be a color film it obviously has some meaningful parts that don't work in black and white. It's aesthetically, but also narratively important.

This is a very good film after it was finished it instantly became very popular and the producers suggested Jacques Tati to continue making films with the character, Francois. But he wanted to make another character, which would have a wider meaning. In result of this born Mr. Hulot who Jacques Tati played in 4 films. Jour de fete is his first full-length feature, but still stands out as a masterful film.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
My brief review of the film
sol-25 November 2005
Originally intended to be shown fully in colour, there is now a DVD release of the film in which every frame is colorized, however the most widely available print as of 2005 is a black and white one with a few objects coloured in by hand. That is the version that I watched, and which this review is about. The film has similarities to Tati's famous M. Hulot tetralogy, and although inferior, this is still amusing stuff, with the gags delivered through the action of the characters rather than their speech. The film is pretty much without plot, and the main story involving a postman only starts a significant way into it, but it still manages to amuse. The narration by an old woman does not enhance the film though. Certain random objects are coloured in for the black and white print, and while this is interesting too see, it is just a gimmick, and not anything artistic. There is little, if any, thematic motivation behind the choices of what is to be in colour, and therefore it barely enhances the film. Overall it is still an above average film despite its drawbacks, there is some interesting sound work and the selected music is delightful. It is entertaining, but lacking in the depth that 'Mon Oncle' and 'PlayTime' would display.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The bicycle as ideal transport
silverauk2 January 2003
You see the upcoming problems of traffic in this little village just after the war, I guess somewhere in Normandy where the bicycle of François the postman can drive from village to village. Some cars were driven really dangerously because nobody was conscious of the danger of accidents and some people drove to fast through the villages where everybody still lived on the street: the dogs as well as the chickens as the gooses as the elder people. When François gets drunk he enters the local café and stands in two seconds at the window of the first floor! The movie is full of gags that are inspired by Buster Keaton but absolutely original. The people he has to deliver the letters, peasants and habitants of the village shout at him: "A l'Americaine" which means fast and efficient but one of them also comments that he just should deliver the letters and that this is already quite an accomplishment. And yes, in Belgium postmen are now checked on maximum 9 seconds for delivering a letter. There also calculations to make another tariff for delivering letters in places far away. Jacques Tati is unsurpassed as a French comic and he has a very special place in history of French cinema not to be compared with anyone else.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Jacques Tati's First Feature
gavin69428 December 2014
Once a year the fair comes for one day to the little town Sainte-Severe-sur-Indre. All inhabitants are scoffing at Francois (Jacques Tati), the postman, but he seems not to recognize. The film is largely a feature-length extension of Tati's earlier short "School for Postmen".

The film is largely a visual comedy, though dialogue is still used to tell part of the story. This really calls to mind the silent greats of Chaplin, Keaton and Lloyd. Had Tati been born a couple decades earlier, he might have been included among their ranks.

While not perfect, and with less-than-stellar production value, the promise of Tati is evident here. His future films (including "Mr. Hulot's Holiday") would expand on this comic intellect.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A little masterpiece of bucolic mores
JohnHowardReid20 March 2007
The color version is certainly a revelation and much to be preferred to the murky black-and-white sub-titled print I saw on original theatrical release. Actually sub-titles are not really necessary at all. Even born-and-bred Parisians would have difficulty penetrating the heavy provincial accents of the villagers. Furthermore, much of the dialogue is deliberately mumbled, slurred or made indecipherable by background noise. The only stretch of speech that is clearly heard is the narration of the tent movie and its information could easily be picked up by simply watching the visuals. Even an ability to understand the old lady (she is supposed to be a native but has an incongruous Parisian accent) who acts as a narrator to tie the various segments together is not at all important.

So what we actually have here is pure pantomime that is given added realism by being filtered through an aural surround. Tati is the perfect clown who makes the most of a succession of clever gags that are superbly timed and all the more enjoyable because of their insight into the mores and customs of the little village. In fact as a revelation of village life with all its atmosphere, its interplay, its horseplay, its petty quarrels, its come-and-go tensions, the movie is second to none.

The support characters too have a wonderful part to play in the action, whether professional players like Frankeur, Beauvais and Decomble or simple villagers like Vallée and Wirtz who never made another movie in their lives.

The beautiful music score lends further enchantment to the pastel colors of Tati's immaculately chosen locations.

All told, a little masterpiece and a fitting herald to Tati's best and most celebrated movie, Les Vacances de Monsieur Hulot (1953).
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun, Poignant And Pointed
bix17112 February 2016
Jacques Tati's first feature came as a salve to the horrors of war and its resulting despair (check out the trailer as proof) and the film's sweet sensibility seems designed to make the post-war French audience feel good about itself. It details an innocent, peaceful time in the countryside in which a traveling fair comes to a small village, almost as a reward for surviving the heartache of the previous decade; and the happy villagers flock en masse to forget about their stresses for a day. Tati plays the village mail carrier, a self-righteous but likable beanpole who, after watching a film at the makeshift cinema about advances in American mail delivery, attempts to mimic them in all their ridiculousness using only his trusty bicycle. Tati has no problem poking gentle fun at his character's stuffiness but also delights in the absurdity of the feeling of inferiority the French seemed to have assumed; after years of living under the yoke of the Nazis and then the Allies, their competition with America is presented as needless and silly. (It's not for nothing that Tati's character is named Francois.) As a comedian, Tati seems to derive his influence primarily from Buster Keaton's graceful and perfectly timed stunts, but his take is more wobbly--you really feel the danger of what's happening on screen almost as if it were unrehearsed. (Among other stunts, he rides his bike through a fire and cuts in front of an oncoming car.) While there are no real laugh-out-loud moments, there are plenty of warm chuckles and some really pleasurable recurring gags, particularly with a cross-eyed old man. But where the film shines is in its poignant conclusion, where the promise of a carefree future is personified by the child who adopts Tati's responsibilities after he sheds them to fade into the anonymity of the peasantry. As long as you come into "Jour de Fete" with the right attitude and appreciate it for what it represents, you'll have some fun.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Tati vs America; SLIGHT SPOILERS
zetes1 October 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Jacques Tati proves more than any other filmmaker that comedy is

just as much an art form as drama. This was his first feature

length film, and while it's not quite up to the level of his three

masterpieces, M. Hulot's Holiday, Mon Oncle, and Playtime

(although the first time I saw each of them, I said the same thing),

it's as delightful as almost any other film ever made. Tati is not yet

M. Hulot, but Francois, a postman who rides through his small

hometown delivering mail on his bike. As the film opens, the town

is preparing its Bastille Day festivities (apparently; I don't think they

ever say "Bastille Day," but it's pretty obvious). The jokes are not

quite on the same level as those other three; they are a bit more

slight, though there were plenty of laugh-out-loud moments (the

cross-eyed guy has two hilarious scenes).

Around 2/3 of the film is spent during the celebration; Tati builds a

delightful atmosphere that will be recall memories of these types

of small town fairs if you youself have taken place in them. Like his

other films, the plot is very tenuous. Tati is much more interested

in the people around him.

Near the end of the fair, Francois sees a newsreel that shows how

high tech American postmen are. They are trained to fly

helicopters, the film tells us, and do so to deliver the mail. Some

have their own airplanes. To train, they race motorcycles through

obstacle courses, jumping over fire and such. Francois is

depressed by the lack of adventure and supreme efficiency in his

own work; through the night, people tease him about being tiny

compared to the American postmen.

The next morning, Francois devises different ways to make his

route go faster. A lot of these scenes are repeated from his short

Ecole de facteurs, which is included on the Criterion DVD of Mon

Oncle (this film has been out on VHS before; I've heard that

Criterion also restored Jour de fete but have no plans to release it

yet, which is depressing and, well, confusing).

The end is as beautiful as the marvelous endings of his three

masterpieces. "Fin" in a Tati film is always a sad event. I can't think

of any other filmmaker whose films I desire to watch over and over

again; I've seen M. Hulot's Holiday three times in the month and a

half since I bought it. There were tears in my eyes when "Fin"

appeared. 9/10.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fair Dos
writers_reign7 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I came to this movie with a bias against slapstick as personified by Chaplin, a tolerance for the Buster Keaton variety and a definite leaning towards Laurel and Hardy. Tati, of course is neither yet has elements of all three (or four if you're a pedant). The word that springs to mind is 'gentle' for whilst there is definite satire at work it's satire with its teeth drawn. Tati wants us to love French provincial life as he loves it and rage against 'modernisation' and clearly you will enjoy his oeuvre more if you are sympathetic to his cause. Much has been made in the reviews I've read here of the color aspect but as I see it this is beside the point. If color was a necessity for any points he wanted to make then he would have abandoned the project until a color system could be perfected rather than shoot a black and white back-up version. What really matters is the story or lack of same and the way in which he chooses to tell it which is, overall, successful.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tour de Poste
chaswe-2840227 October 2018
The title of this lop-sided production is highly misleading, which is why I've substituted my own. Before watching this colour version I felt sure I'd seen the film in black and white, in about 1949. All I seemed to remember was the postman leaping on his tethered bike, cycling away, and being jerked to a standstill. But somehow it didn't look at all the same when I saw it in colour just now. Are the two versions identical in content ?

Anyway, the film has little to do with the fate worse than death. Unusually for Tati, who has here a nearly normal walk, it has something which is almost a plot, which is that Tati sets out to demonstrate that he is the equal of American postal practices, employing planes, helicopters and the rest. Needless to say, he fails, but his French failure is preferable for those members of humanity with endearing values. End of story. I didn't think it was much good, but it foreshadowed Hulot's sublime holiday. Holidays have no plots; they just are. And so are fêtes. Good shots of happy children.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed