Arctic Fury (1951) Poster

(1951)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Will Someone Tell That Narrator to Shut Up?
boblipton9 May 2018
This is a cobbled-together movie, composed of a couple of abortive semi-documentaries produced in the mid-1930s with new linking material added to produce a story.

The story is that Alfred Delcambre is a Doctor up in Alaska, flying off to deal with an incipient plague. His plane is forced down and he has to walk back home. Along the way he makes friends with a couple of bear cubs and sees a lot of wild life -- reindeer and muskoxen and otters and such, much of which is explained by a narrator while a happy score of stock music plays.

The nature photography is the best part of the movie, even if the shots of the wild life seem to have degraded before they could be matched up with the rest of the movie -- the careful observer will notice the wide variation in film stock. The story is potentially engaging in its Odyssey-like simplicity, but that narrator got on my nerves pretty quick!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weak movie but watch it for the animals.
avakay-982873 October 2020
This is a weak movie and the actor's ripped shirt looks silly. Watch it for the animals. Lots of animal action. The bear cubs are cute.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I cannot believe this is a Frankenfilm
brandonrp3 October 2020
I was actually pretty damn shocked to discover that Arctic Fury is a Frankenfilm! Cobbled together with footage from 2 previous 1930s films. I didn't notice this. Using footage from previous films, & cobbling it together, with some newly shot footage & passing it off as a "new film", was a common tactic, or should I say trick, commonly used as a cost cutting measure, prior to the 1970s. However, this tactic was usually practiced by either indie films or poverty row studio films. They certainly weren't usually done by any big studios, like RKO, in this instance. Still, there was enough of an interesting story & breathtaking wildlife footage, that I was able to enjoy this particular, Frankenfilm. The narrator was annoying, but not enough to make me turn it off. 6 out of 10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A sad excuse for a film.
planktonrules26 February 2020
"Arctic Fury" is a sad excuse for a movie, as it is essentially made up of old extent footage tossed together. And, to make it more comprehensible, annoying and ever-present narration is used. As a result, it's a movie that mostly stinks...though some of the old footage is nice on its own.

The story begins with dull narration about how the Eskimos respond to plagues. How much of this is true is anyone's guess. Soon, a doctor volunteers to head to the town to help these people with the outbreak. However, along the way, his plane crashes and the doctor is forced to trek through the wilderness to the eskimo village.

Essentially, the film uses footage from "Tundra" (1936)...and that film used footage from "SOS Iceberg" (1933) and I am pretty sure the airplane scenes are from that earlier American-German co-production. To fill in the gaps, there is the annoying narration as well as a bit of new footage. The overall results are less than thrilling and really show you how cynical the folks at RKO were about passing this off as a new movie. How bored and annoyed audiences must have been when they watched this. The only reason I give this one a 2 is that some of the footage looks nice...1930s nice!



By the way, the annoying narrator says that the muskoxen are the most dangerous and aggressive of the mammals in the great white north. Well, this simply isn't true. I am NOT recommending you go hug one...it will most likely kill you. But the risk from them is far less than polar bears or any other bear of the region, such as Brown or Black bears. Heck, wolves are probably more dangerous as well! So please don't take what the film says as gospel!
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Harsh Critics Seem To Expect Something Epic
uncatema3 January 2022
This film is exactly what is it supposed to be. Footage taking from other films and spliced together with a human story attached to it. It's not a lousy film yet it's not a swell film. It's what it is meant to be. Something to watch.

The viewer can get past critiquing by simply watching it. If a viewer is looking for something spectacular try a ten star film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Grade D
stewart0602-907-94757029 January 2020
Pure cinematic bargain basement junk, made as a 2nd feature in an era when such trash was commonly produced. About as realistic as a Disney cartoon.
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Plain and simple story, nice Arctic footage.
pronker9 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
While I spotted an Asian sun bear cub with typical white horseshoe breast markings playing the role of an arctic type of bear cub, it's still fun as a movie and appropriate for children while a bit of entertainment for adults. The icy atmosphere makes for good armchair adventure. I especially enjoyed the footage of whales, musk oxen and a whole group of scavenging ferrets or maybe they were weasels.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well worth watching
dboyden-596423 October 2020
Way too harsh on the criticism. Totally enjoyed the awesome wildlife footage, staged model airplane footage & the baby bear cub co-stars. Yes its contrived & implausible, but lots of fun on an early Saturday morning.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Couldn't stop watching
dvaleriomarciniec3 October 2020
When talent could create a movie simply around 1 actor, in black and white, hilarious writing, and captivate your audience.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very little to offer. An eye-roller
signlady3 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Came in from work on a break and this movie was on TCM - so I watched over half to the end of it -and wasted a perfectly good break.

As many stated, this is a movie cobbled together with another movie - I knew I'd seen those 2 cubs in another film.

It's just dumb in the truest sense.

The narration is cheezy & over-dramatic. It's like a comical parody of dramatic narration, but the narrator is dead-serious. He has no idea that in the future, when people parody documentary narration, they will sound like this.

Little children may enjoy this because of the animals. Particularly the bear cubs are cute.

But there's much incorrect information laced throughout the film as has been pointed out in the other reviews.

The huge plot hole, and the most continuously irritating issue is this; the narrator dramatizes this guy as a really smart doctor and skilled survivor - but the fact that he spends enormous amounts of energy surviving and walking, trying to find civilization, and moreover, keeping bear cubs, and sees planes flying over head. . . Yet, he never spends an ounce of energy finding ways to make huge signs in open areas visible from air . . . ???

Cue rolling the eyes.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed