Without Honor (1949) Poster

(1949)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
In the San Fernando Valley, the wages of adultery are...what, exactly?
bmacv31 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
A curious, claustrophobic drama about adultery, sibling rivalry and (possibly) murder, Without Honor never leaves the confines of a modest ranch house in the San Fernando Valley, save for brief excursions down the highway that fronts the house and into the orange groves that lie behind. It's stagy and contrived, but it manages to hold your attention.

Housewife Laraine Day is threading meat and vegetables on skewers when the doorbell rings. The caller is her illicit lover Franchot Tone, bearing some bad news: A private detective has uncovered their affair, and Tone wants to break it off. Day, locked in a childless marriage with a husband (Bruce Bennett) who neglects her for nights of poker with his younger brother (Dane Clark) and his high-living pals, grows hysterical – suicidal. She grabs one of the skewers to end it all; when Tone tries to stop her, he impales himself on it and slumps in a heap on the laundry-room floor.

As Day wipes up the blood with paper towels, the darn doorbell rings again, admitting Clark, whose forced bonhomie has a malicious edge to it. Seems that for years he's been nursing a grudge against Day for rejecting his drunken advances when he was only 18. In revenge, he hired the detective and has invited Bennett, Tone and Tone's wife (Agnes Moorehead), to the house so he can publicly humiliate Day with the dirt he's dug up. Moorehead (who's known about her husband's dalliances for some time) and the clueless Bennett duly arrive. But to Clark's consternation, Tone never shows up....

Tone, on the downslide of his career, vanishes quite early on, and isn't missed. Desperately though he strives, Clark was never a John Garfield. The underrated Bennett is always welcome, though it's a chump's part. Moorehead is all the more delicious for craftily underplaying. That leaves Day, who spends most of the short movie mute, close to catatonic, striking silent-movie attitudes of anguish for the camera as the drama swirls around her.

Without Honor, directed by Irving Pichel, doesn't sit too comfortably on the screen. At times, it suggests an adapted radio play (or a script for early television? There's a needless episode of a new TV being delivered to the bungalow). But no such provenance seems in evidence. Then again it brings to mind the conventions of a one-acter by Strindberg (notably, The Stronger). It explores the same Southern California territory as the novels of James M. Cain, if less lustily. But Cain never would have stood for the unexpectedly rosy resolution – it's a bunny plucked out of a very soiled and battered hat.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Almost censorship...
churei25 February 2008
The problems that may be inherent in the story were made worse because the then-still-somewhat-powerful arbiters of censorship gave the film a rough time. The objection, I would assume, resulted from the fact that the Laraine Day character is allowed to live and not 'pay for her almost-fatal-act-of-murder'. Day didn't always get a chance to grab the parts that lead to awards, but she is more than good in this one. Sorry to contradict one of the earlier writers on the piece, but the worst acting in the film, and the only truly awful performance, is the one by Agnes Moorehead, wearing an outfit that could have come from Ed Wood. This is far from an unwatchable film... it does have suspense...and the ending is surprising in denouement. It is forgotten, I admit, but this film did earn considerable attention in the news regarding its producers' fights to get it released without disastrous cuts. Thus, a moment in the censorship issues that were finally blasted apart by people like Otto Preminger.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An outrageous melodrama that hides its secret meaning out in the open
meaninglessname9 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I can't escape the feeling that many people have watched this film without realizing its real plot, one that would never have made the screen in 1949 if it had been more open, yet it's open enough once you realize that what seems to be the main plot is more of a subplot. This can't be explained without spoiling it. Hopefully you'll stop reading here, go watch the film, then come back and see if you agree with me.

SPOILER ALERT: STOP HERE / Repressed housewife Laraine Day has been having a brief affair with married man Franchot Tone. He comes to her house in the daytime to break it off, which he was always going to do anyway, because a detective has been coming around to his office, and other places they've been, asking questions about her and about their relationship.

While attempting to commit suicide (the first of two such attempts in the film) she accidentally kills him with a knife when he tries to prevent it.

For the rest of the film Day is in a state of madness. She does not try to escape or hide the crime but phones for a cab to take her to the police to turn herself in.

This is thwarted by the entrance of obnoxious brother-in-law Dane Clark, who launches a long verbal attack on her relationship with his brother, during which he manages to intercept the cab and dismiss it.

It turns out he's the one who hired the detective, and has arranged for both couples involved to meet at the house so he can humiliate Day and break up her marriage. Of course he is unaware that one of the participants is lying dead in the living room.

OK, big spoiler time. Remember you weren't supposed to look at this till you've seen the film. Turns out Tone isn't dead but got outside and taken to the hospital where he gallantly blames his wound on an accident. His wife Agnes Moorehead and Day's husband Bruce Bennett end up forgiving and forgetting, though with much more effort on Bennett's part after Day nearly succeeds in a second suicide attempt.

But the big spoiler is this: the movie isn't so much about adultery, manslaughter and suicide as about Clark's questionable brotherly love for big brother Bennett. His actions are those of a rejected lover trying to break up his flame's romance, the flame in this case being his brother. He talks about how happy the two of them were before Day came along and how happy they can be now if they go off together. His obnoxious personality switches to fawning overhelpfulness around Bennett. In fact Bennett himself finally realizes it in a key speech at the end where he goes so far as to blame Day's infidelity on Clark's repeated efforts to keep them apart.

In other words the film makers managed to sneak a plot about a homo-erotic incestuous attachment past the 1949 censors by diverting attention to a seeming murder mystery. Not your typical 1940s Hollywood flick.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Odd Little Melodrama
dougdoepke19 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A suburban housewife gets entangled romantically with a married man whom she thinks she's accidentally killed. Meanwhile her spurned brother-in-law takes revenge by trying to break up her marriage to his brother.

The movie's a genuine curiosity. Almost every scene takes place in Janet's (Day) livingroom as though the movie were a filmed stage play. Thus the budget for sets was probably a buck- eighty. The veteran cast, however, surely came higher. Still, I am a bit curious about Franchot Tone's role since it's so brief, probably there to build up marquee appeal.

A lot depends on Day's performance since she's in about every scene as the anguished wife. But, surprisingly, she doesn't have that many lines, which means she has to register emotions through expressive acting. The accomplished Day does this quite well without going over the top. I wish I could say the same for Clark whose last few minutes are darn near hysterical and quite out of character for the actor.

What the movie excels at is period detail of the early 1950's. Catch the dawn of the TV era as husband Fred (Bennett) brings home the couple's first TV; or the orange grove that was soon to give way to expanding LA suburbs; or the ice cream truck playing out its 'I'm here' tune. Catch also the many kitchen conveniences then making their way into a prospering suburbia. Together these add up to a post-war expansion period now only seen on film.

Too bad the heavy hand of the Production Code is evident throughout, especially in the transgression-punishment department. Are we really supposed to believe Dennis (Tone) and Jane have been carrying on all this time without getting physical. That may not be plausible given the heavy guilt angle, but it does mean wife Jane and husband Fred can get back together in a chaste way at the end. Then again, Jane's got to be punished for hiding her supposed lover's body. This Code requirement does happen through her bloody suicide attempt. All of this means the scales on both heaven and Earth balance out in the end, as the Code demands.

All in all, it's a decent little melodrama (not noir), however, more suited for TV than the big screen. Nonetheless, it serves as an unusual showcase for that fine underrated actress Laraine Day.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth A Look
catey-4084827 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this movie on TCM, and I must say I enjoyed it. It looks like a typical melodrama for the first half hour or so, overwrought and predictable. But as we get to know the characters, and they reveal their various motivations, things start to get interesting. In the first confrontation between the cheating wife and her truly slimy brother-in-law, wonderfully played by Dane Cook, we're initially led to believe he has good reason for setting her up...after all, she's been unfaithful to his brother, she's come between them deliberately (in his eyes, anyway), and we know, though he doesn't, that she's just stabbed her lover. So she's not exactly being presented as a sympathetic female character. Then we think his motivation is to get revenge because she spurned his advances once and he still wants her...he's jealous of his own brother. But at the end we find out why he really hates her, and it's both disturbingly creepy and heartbreaking. Once the lover's wife and the cheating wife's husband arrive on the scene, nothing goes the way we (and bro-in-law) expect...the characters don't react the way they're supposed to. The shocking reveal to the lover's wife turns out not to be not so shocking...in fact she isn't even surprised. She knows exactly what kind of man her philandering husband is. And far from being angry, she sympathizes with his latest victim. I won't add any more plot details, but the movie has a very satisfying ending. Unlike most movies of this genre and period, the unfaithful wife does not pay the ultimate price for her infidelity. But it's not a happy ending tied with a bow...we know her life, and her husband's, and the lives of the other couple, will never be the same. I have to mention the wonderful performance by Agnes Moorehead as the cheated-upon wife. She's dignified and restrained, very believable as a wife who lost her illusions years ago. And her sympathy for her husband's latest conquest also comes across as totally genuine. This isn't a masterpiece by any means, but the performances and the plot twists make this movie worth the time.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tight little drama...made on the cheap
nomoons1128 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a terrible film by any means. A lot of scenes are just a little bit..."yeah right" or "gimme a break" but it's not that bad. Watching it you'll immediately know that it didn't have the largest of budgets.

Basic premise is a wife is having an affair with another married man and he decides he wants to end the relationship because he thinks her husband has found out. What's actually happened is the little brother of her husband has been plotting a lot of years to get back at her for rejecting him when they were younger. From there it's a lot of melodrama to say the least.

Production value on this wasn't that great but the story in itself isn't too bad. The ending really makes up for lesser qualities of the film. Go with the ratings on this and you won't get any surprises.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Day With Little Dialogue
KHofferMD28 August 2018
Watch carefully. Lorraine Day has very few lines in this movie. She did most of her acting by facial expressions responding to the other actor's long monologues (Clark & Moorehead). Pichel got the best out her.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Move over "Plan 9 From Outter Space"!!!
bailodhia28 May 2006
Yikes!! Where does one begin? I bought the new DVD of this movie, just watched it, and now have chosen it as the worst film I've ever seen, with all due respects to former title holder Ed Wood. In fact, this movie has about the same level of production artistry and skill of a typical Wood epic. It's truly amazing. A pure fiasco on every level! Especially story and acting, with the sole exception of the unsinkable Agnes Moorehead who couldn't give a bad performance if they tied her up and gave her sleeping pills.

Ironically, I've waited years to finally see this film. A great admirer and fan of the incomparable classic film composer Max Steiner, I found that this was one of his few films that I was never able to see. I was always curious why he was loaned out from WB to score this minor forgotten film when he was at the zenith of his power and popularity in 1949 - having just composed for "Johnny Belinda", "Key Largo", "Treasure of Sierra Madre", "The Fountainhead", and "Don Juan" - all scores which entered film history.

Why did he go score this meager independent effort? I suspect that the director was a good friend of his and after the film was put together everyone saw what a disaster it was and believed that Steiner could achieve a true miracle and save the movie by putting his glorious music to this awful mess.

I never thought I'd ever admit this, but Steiner's score absolutely destroys the film. Perhaps after paying his astronomical loan-out fee from Warners, the producers insisted on getting their money's worth with a wall-to-wall thundering score. I'd hate to think it was Max's choice. But this film desperately needed just an ounce of subtle music here and there to make it more realistic and believable - and Steiner unfortunately scores it like a Wagnerian opera. I came across the sound track years ago and it was one of my favorites - vibrant, melodic, passionate epic music. At the time I had no idea what the plot of the film was and could only conjure the most epic images of car chases, train crashes, exotic locales - possibly a trip to Chinatown. When I finally read that the whole thing takes place in a bungalow in the San Fernando Valley I couldn't believe it. And watching the movie I was horrified to see that the surging, thunderous, throbbing passages that I thought was probably a thrilling chase culminating in a spectacular train crash was simply Laraine Day walking into her bedroom and sitting down at her vanity table and putting on lipstick! Poor Max! Poor movie! A dull, nothing plot. One tired cliché after another. Ridiculously motivated characters, acting badly as they chew up the drab scenery. Just a preposterous mess that can't be explained. Top talent all around. First-rate director, acclaimed writer, filmdom's greatest composer, a photographer (Lionel Lindon) who had shot some of Paramount's finest hits and would a few years later cap his career with an Oscar for Mike Todd's "Around the World in Eighty Days" - and this ultra cheap, crummy-looking movie is the result. A true aberation and unique disaster of film-making history. See this with a friend - you'l laugh yourselves sick.
9 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well-Made Film Noir That Breaks Conventions
prognerd21 February 2007
I usually refrain from commenting on films because there are so many other reviewers out there...but seeing how this just has one review and a very negative, I felt I should offer my opinion.

I'll admit the first 20 or 30 minutes felt like a typical Hollywood pot-boiler. Cheating wife accidentally kills lover; will she get away with it; etc. After this set-up, the film becomes an onion - revealing new layers of characters' motivations and back-story.

Laraine Day stands out superbly as the cheating wife...whole scenes develop around her without her speaking, yet we know what's going on in her mind.

I have to agree with the other reviewer that I loved Steiner's score...but did feel it inappropriate at times. The performances on screen are very subtle and the music is anything but subtle.

I particularly enjoyed the second half of the film as characters acted against stereotypes.

The DVD I watched was from Geneon and featured an adequate transfer; not stellar, but much above average from the usual run-of-the-mill public domain stuff.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Big Giant Emotions!!!! but to what end?
jjnxn-13 September 2017
What an odd picture. An Overwrought Melodrama with a capital O and a capital M this breaks out of the starting gate hitting high C and continues at a fevered pitch right up to its conclusion.

Unhappy Laraine stabs caddish Franchot by accident then rambles hysterically while the callously odious Dane Clark circles around making her life hell. The one beacon of restraint in the entire enterprise is Agnes Moorehead who shows up none too soon and steals the picture with a controlled and dignified performance while all around her her cast-mates are swallowing scenery whole.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Talents Wasted
Bucs196015 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
What a stinkeroo!!!!! Released through United Artists, this boredom packed film thankfully only runs for just over an hour. More would have been hazardous to the viewer's health.

It's full of competent players who do their best to give this clunker some credibility The story, what there is, concerns poor Laraine Day, married to the ever bland Bruce Bennett, who strayed from her marriage once upon a time with Franchot Tone. When he shows up on her doorstep, she panics and stabs him with a barbecue skewer She drags him into another room, closes the door and sits around all day. Meanwhile her mean spirited brother-in-law, played by Dane Clark, tells all who will listen about Day's little fling and she loses her wits. After attempting suicide, she discovers that her old flame, Tone, didn't die after all. Instead he has been wandering around with a skewer in his chest. All is forgiven and roll the credits.

What a waste..........at least Franchot Tone was saved the embarrassment of being in this film for very long. It's almost a walk-on part, as he spends most of his time as a would-be corpse, locked in the laundry room. Quite a slide from his starring roles in the 1930s. Oh I almost forgot......Agnes Moorhead is along for the ride as well. You might want to miss this film.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"She's No Good, Freddie!"
davidcarniglia28 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting drama. Sort of a mash-up of film noir with a British-style kitchen sink drama. Great cast with even, taut performances. This is very talky, psychological movie.

The claustrophobia is palpable; Lorraine Day's Jane is literally stuck in her house. Though tongue-tied for most of the movie, she nonetheless expresses herself aptly with facial expressions. The few outdoor scenes highlight, but don't intrude on the plot. There's nothing extraneous. Despite a very short run time, Without Honor is emotionally exhausting.

Day, Clark, Moorehead, and Bennett fill almost all of the scenes. Tone, hidden and presumed dead by Jane, looms in everyone's thoughts. It's Clarke's Bill who really sets the plot in motion. Jealous of his brother Fred (Bennett), he exposes Dennis's (Tone's) affair with Jane, Fred's wife.

He seeks attention, and certainly drinks in the atmosphere of betrayal. Bill, Moorehead (as Tone's wife Catherine), and Fred take turns humiliating and accusing Jane like police detectives or prosecutors who know their suspect is guilty. We don't need interrogations at police headquarters or courtroom scenes; the excellent script and the actors' menacing roles suffice. Actually, there's no crime.

After Jane breaks down and 'confesses', there's a rapid shift from an accusatory to a sympathetic tone; as the group realizes what happened at the house, and soon discovers that Dennis is ok. Ironically, Katherine, who is the greatest victim of the affair, becomes solicitous of Jane.

Jane becomes the center of attention and affection, and Bill has become the outcast. His desperate bid to sabotage his brother's marriage has backfired. It's as though he can't stand for people to be content or happy. The last scene is pitiful; he's literally chasing after the attention that he so desperately needs.

The comfortable domesticity of the house has prevailed. The TV installers, the girl scouts, and the ice cream man can all come back, now that the disturbing outside influences have run their course.

An unusual movie. Thoughtful without being preachy, and tense despite having very little action. Definitely worth a look.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Hour Of Twilight.
hitchcockthelegend23 September 2018
Without Honor is directed by Irving Pichel and written by James Pope. It stars Dane Clark, Laraine Day, Franchot Tone and Agnes Moorehead. Music is by Max Steiner and cinematography by Lionel Lindon.

A mixed bag on offer in this one, where a broth of "sins" is stirred suitably in predominantly one location. Set-up bares a striking resemblance to Hitchcock's Rope released the previous year, where a group of characters are thrust together in one living room deconstructing their sins, shattered dreams and ulterior motives - all while a supposed dead body lays prone in one of the bedrooms.

The thematics at work are prime film noir, adultery, suicide attempt, sexual aggression, jealous agenda, duping and etc, all of which only comes to life half way through the piece. Here in is the problem, the pic asks for a lot of patience from the viewer before really getting going, which although the character group dynamic is pungent with an unsavoury odour, it never fully gets out of first gear.

Things aren't helped by the flat visual look of the piece, where with the story set in daytime, we yearn for a bit of noir flourish from one of the ace noir photographers of the time. Then there's Steiner's score, which is a cracker, ebullience in abundance, only it's in the wrong film! Moorehead is wasted in what is ultimately a walk on passive role, but at least Clark and Day nail the traits of their respective characters.

No hidden gem here, and noir hunters should be advised this is only noir from a plot perspective, but enough damaged human conditioning here to make it above average. 6.5/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Endora saves the Day
marcar91228 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
If it wasn't for Agnes Moorehead and the stark black-and-white cinematography, this odd little 70-minute film wouldn't have grabbed my attention. Not a big Laraine Day or Dane Clark fan, I watched "Without Honor" because of Moorehead and Franchot Tone. And I was right, they're the only good things about it. (Altho Tone is looking old and baggy eyed at this point in '49 and he's dispensed with in the first 20 minutes or so...) The entire picture is frantic like a daytime soap: Day is her usual crazy (as in lunatic) self, professing love for her paramour Tone; when he rejects her in favor of his wife (Moorehead) and kids she tries to stab herself and accidentally??? stabs Tone and hides him in the laundry room. Then comes the real melodrama: her brother-in-law (Clark) shows up and says he knows about the affair, has invited Tone and Moorehead to her house, as well as her husband (played by the square Bruce Bennett) and they're all going to have a little chat about cheating. (Meanwhile, as the stabbed and bloody Tone lies in the next room some Girl Scouts show up, the ice cream man cruises the neighborhood and Day runs around hysterical and hamming it up. Enough's enough. Turns out Tone's not dead after all, Clark is sexually jealous of his brother, and Bennett is willing to forgive and forget. In between there's a lot of face slapping and even an attempted suicide (slashed wrists by Day) that requires the bathroom door to be busted in.

Moorhead gives the only reasonable and real performance--letting Day know her husband is a serial philanderer, doesn't really love his "little girlfriends" including her, and that he'll always come back home and she'll always take him back.

This one is more "All My Children" than "All About Eve" but there's something very frantic and fast-paced and even funny about it. The last shot of Clark screaming for his brother in the middle of the road--all alone, his plans for revenge on Day shot to heck...as the words "THE END" appear on the painted white line of the highway--that ALMOST make this one a "so bad it's good" winner!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not what one expects
jeffhaller3 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The whole film feels as if you are watching someone's nightmare. The situation is frighteningly real. Very unbelievable but at the same time, that is what gives it the dreamlike atmosphere. There are surprises and what's more characters whom we think should be uncaring and unsympathetic turn out just the opposite. Dane Clark plays the villain of all villains. A sexy one at that. Don't ignore this one. It is short and very rewarding.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Calling it a day can be dangerous
bkoganbing27 August 2018
Franchot Tone, him married to Agnes Moorehead and Laraine Day, her married to Bruce Bennett have been carrying on an affair, but Tone comes over to Day's house while Bennett's away and says time to end it. Bennett's a dull sort and Day doesn't want things to end. She gets positively hysterical and remains so the rest of the film with the events that follow. Quite a bit does follow.

Manipulating all that is going on is Dane Clark who is Bennett's brother and it's positively Iago like the way he controls all around him. This might have been Dane Clark's best moment on the big screen as it is Laraine Day's.

If this is ever remade and maybe it should be, it will be a great example about how the Code could nearly ruin a story. The censorship was such that so much was left out in the telling.

Still a nice piece of melodrama.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
SATURATED STRANGENESS...ATYPICAL ADULT DRAMA...ACTOR'S SHOWCASE
LeonLouisRicci13 August 2021
This Odd Film is Loaded with Edgy Entertainment that Challenged Censors.

In this Downbeat Norish Drama it Confronts Head-On... Adultery, Murder, Suicide, and a Bi-Sexual Incestuous Obsession.

The Wordy Script Takes Place in One Location in a Few Rooms.

With Loraine Day Giving a Difficult Almost Wordless Performance.

The Writing is Sharp and the Performances are Top B-Movie Gold.

The Film's Downfall, if it has one, is the Constant Verbiage and Run-On Dialog by Dane Clark.

It is the Antithesis of Day's Silent Portrayal.

Clark's Constant Jabbering is a Dated, Nervous, Non-Stop Accosting of His Brother's (Bruce Bennett) Wife and His Brother.

He Reveals an Unhealthy Attachment to His Sibling.

Also an Equal Hatred for and Jealousy of Loraine Day.

His Actions are Loathsome and Neurotic.

With Relentless Force and those Dated Antics may be Difficult for some Viewers to Watch.

Along with Bennett, Agnes Moorehead, in a Minor but Crucial Role is Outstanding, but so is the Entire Cast.

Underlined by Max Steiner's Striking Score and a Plot Twist or Two.

The Ensemble Production Manages to Compel the Overloaded Story. And Bring it Together for a Strange and Unique Viewing Experience, Especially in 1949.

Above Average and Certainly...

Worth a Watch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much better than expected B-Movie.
MOscarbradley27 January 2021
This little B-Movie, clocking in at a very economical 69 minutes, could easily have been an episode of "The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" with some top-notch guest stars, one of whom gets dispatched in the first ten minutes and he's the biggest name in the picture. The ridiculous plot hardly bears thinking about and yet it's that very plot that makes this so interesting. Laraine Day is the adulterous wife who accidentally stabs her lover but that's only the beginning of her troubles. While her lover lies conveniently in the box-room her snake of a brother-in-law, her lover's wife and her husband all gather in the sitting room; yep, it's mostly all done on the one set. It gets progressively sillier as it goes along but the very game cast, that includes Franchot Tone, Dane Clark and Agnes Moorehead, add a welcome touch of class, (Moorehead's terrific). It may not be in the same c;lass as something like "Detour" but it's still so much better than a lot of big studio productions of the time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
She's living her own afternoon soap opera.
mark.waltz28 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Stab a lover, get blackmailed by a vindictive brother-in-law, have a confrontation with the lover's wife, and get slapped by your husband. That's enough to make anybody want to slash their wrists. In this case, the fragile heroine is Laraine Day, and from the moment you see the supposedly cheery housewife in her apron (greeted by lover Franchot Tone), you know she's destined for a rotten day. Her stabbing of him is accidental; Her intended victim is herself, and she gets absolutely no peace in her effort to hide her crime by wiping her bloody hands not to mention get rid of the habeas corpus. There's two pesky girl scouts, after clothing for a drive, and most nefariously brother-in-law Dane Clark who plays coy with her at first then lets loose with all the venom of every kind of viper imaginable. What are his motives? Total devotion to his brother (Bruce Bennett)? Lust for his sister-in-law? You don't need to tune in tomorrow, because this is wrapped up in a neat little soapy package in just over an hour.

Bruce Bennett, the dullest leading man since Wendell Corey (or actually before...) is the naive husband who is being bamboozled by both his wife and his brother, and must wake up and smell the chock full of nuts. Franchot Tone, now a veteran leading man and certainly not the most romantic cookie in the jar, is an odd choice to play the aging playboy who, according to wife Agnes Moorehead, has been playing around on her several times before. Agnes, handsomely dressed (with the exception of that netting-laced hat), plays the scorned wife who goes from understanding to slightly viperous, and in a sense is the only intelligent character, even though her mood swings at times are somewhat melodramatic. Script wise, this seems more like radio drama than something written for film, and that is what lessens its impact, even though it is at times extremely mesmerizing.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
PLOT HAS 'GET UP AND GO'!
davidalexander-6306831 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This tightly written film noir is proof that you don't need panoramic landscapes, a cast of thousands and action aplenty to make for an enthralling movie. Most of the film takes place in one house with just a handful of characters. It could have made for a decent stage play in its own right. The writing credit goes to gifted screenwriter James Poe who would later pen such masterpieces as Cat On A Hot Tin Roof, They Shoot Horses Don't They?, Lilies Of The Field, The Bedford Incident and Last Train From Gun Hill. This script, from early in his career, though, in its own right, has a lot of get up and go! Just one critical point: how dies Agnes Morehead manage to smoke a cigarette with a veil on?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Skeleton in the closet.
ulicknormanowen23 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
An offbeat thriller,which bears more than a distant resemblance to Hitchcock's contemporary masterpiece "rope "; thus Franchot Tone disappears after a ten -minute stint and the viewer seems lost ; then the main character becomes the wife's brother-in-law , a man who seems a virtuous gent whose wish is to open his cheated brothers 'eyes :but further acquaintance shows a man who loves to demean and to humiliate his sister-in law (Laraine Day),by confronting her to her lover's wife (the always reliable Agnes Moorehead)and later to her hubby looking forward to bringing her a surprise : this TV gift is not gratuitous . it reminds one of Jane Wyman's children in "all that Heaven allows ": a window on the world when you are too old (Wyman) or when work keeps your husband too busy .And it explains the couple's behavior.

For the so called dispenser of justice is actually an overpossessive brother,who envies his sibling ,his nice house, his wife, whereas he's remained a failure .

The director is not Hitchcock ,by a long shot,and one almost forgets the dead body lying somewhere in the house :in "rope" ,the trunk was in the middle of the room and the viewer never forgot the sword hanging on the murderers' head .

But the story has enough unexpected twists to sustain the interest throughout.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Strictly Poverty Row!
JohnHowardReid7 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Despite its interesting cast, none of the players come out of this movie with any credit at all. Admittedly, the promising but utterly boring script is strictly Poverty Row. All the same, one expects seasoned players to do something to spark an audience's interest. Instead, Laraine Day overacts atrociously, and the rest of the cast follow her lead. Alas, this boring, Poverty Row excuse for a film is not only poorly acted and scripted, but ruthlessly directed by Irving Pichel in totally monotonous TV style close-ups. Admittedly, the film's budget was obviously so small that the single set is no larger than would fit on a small stage, but even the least talented of Poverty Row script writers could come up with a more interesting plot and more punchy dialogue than this time-wasting excuse for a movie.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The most awkward situation imaginable
clanciai28 November 2020
Laraine Day makes this film almost exclusively by her facial expressions. She is the one who says the least, if anything at all, while all the others keep talking, especially Dane Clark, who finally is rewarded for it. It is a tight sinister intensive chamber drama about relationships, almost like a play by Ibsen or Strindberg, with many hard arguments, but most of the drama happens under the skin. It has all happened before the film begins, and all we see is the settlement. Agnes Moorehead is the other female character, and although her part also is minor, she keeps it up perfectly with a very stiff upper lip. While the main part of the film is all about Laraine Day's more than justified extreme anguish, which is entirely expressed in her eyes and the face following suit, the best thing is the terrific script - one of Hollywood's very sharpest in this kind of relationship drama. Add to this a magnificent score by Max Steiner, underlining the dramatic turbulence. It had problems with censorship 70 years ago, while today it stands out sovereignly as one of the best chamber dramas on film at the time..
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not a bad idea for a film....but some overacting and weird direction make this one hard to enjoy.
planktonrules26 November 2020
The general plot to "Without Honor" is pretty good. But I found myself unable to love or even like the film due to some bad acting and a director who helped elicit some bizarre performances...particularly (but certainly not exclusively) Laraine Day's.

The story begins with Jane (Day) meeting with her lover, Dennis (Franchot Tone). He's there to announce that their affair is over...he's staying with his wife and she should stay with her husband. However, during their argument, they get into a tussle and he's accidentally stabbed with a fork. While he's lying dying on the laundry room floor, she's in a panicked state for pretty much the entire rest of the film.

Soon, Jane's brother-in-law, Bill (Dane Clark) arrives. He apparently hates her guts and has spent years looking to get revenge on her....and he now knows she's an adultress after paying a private eye to follow her. And, he's now there to meet with her, her lover, his wife and Jane's husband (his brother). During this time, Jane continues to do pretty much nothing other than look scared or constipated...not sure which. Of course, Jane does NOT expect Dennis to come walking through the door, as he's apparently dead in the laundry room.

When the wronged wife (Agnes MoOrehead) arrives, her reaction is just plain bizarre. She accepts that her husband is a philanderer and he's apparently done this before...that isn't the surprising part. What is surprising and hard to believe is how nice she is towards Jane....really TOO nice to be realistic. She's almost motherly towards Jane...which makes no sense. What also doesn't make sense is why Jane STILL seems lost in a fog. Sure, she is traumatized, but her reactions throughout the film just seem weird and unrealistic...just like the wronged wife. What's next? Well, the husband arrives home...and there's, of course, a twist.

The twist, though difficult to believe, didn't bother me....what really did, and why I am rating this one only a 4 is that the acting by Day and Moorehead seemed poor...and the writing and direction all contribute to it. Watchable but it should have been much better...and there are many great parts to the plot.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hysteria in Suburbia
drednm22 April 2022
Without Honor is a 1949 film directed by Irving Pichel and starring Laraine Day as an adulterous housewife in the Los Angeles burbs who has a sort of intervention conducted by her psychotic brother-in-law (Dane Clark) because he's getting even for spurning him and marrying his brother years before.

He arranges for Day and his brother (Bruce Bennett) to be home when Day's lover (Franchot Tone) and his wife (Agnes Moorehead) drop by so he can expose her and get his revenge. Just another sunny day in the burbs.

What Clark doesn't know is that earlier that afternoon Day and Tone had a big fight and break-up and when Day tried to kill herself with a shish-kabob skewer he accidentally fell on it while wrestling it away from her and stabbed himself to death. He's in the laundry room on the floor.

When Clark arrives, he taunts Day, who is about to skip out in a taxi. He goes on and on about how she got him drunk on beers when he was 18 and he made a fool of himself and he's never gotten over it. Day has other things on her mind. Moorehead shows up with no idea why she's there. Bennett comes home from work. Tone is a no-show.

Moorehead has a chat with Day and tells her she knows all about it ... and all his previous dalliances. Bennett pitches a fit, so Day runs into the bathroom and tries to slice her wrists with a razor blade. They call an ambulance but by then they discover that Tone isn't in the laundry room. Keep that ambulance a-comin'.

Everyone in the cast is quite good even if the film is a tad over-the-top. Certainly an interesting post-war take on placid suburbia. Gorgeous cars! Tone drives a 1948 Studebaker convertible and Moorehead drives a 1948 Packard sedan.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed