The Sundowners (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
I find it hard to identify with weak characters
JohnHowardReid20 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Director: GEORGE TEMPLETON. Screenplay: Alan Le May. Based on his 1934 novel, Thunder in the Dust. Photography: Winton C. Hoch. Color by Technicolor. Film editor: Jack Ogilvie. Art director: John B. Goodman. Music: Leonid Raab, Rudolph Schrager. Music director: Irvin Talbot. Orchestrated by Joseph Nussbaum, George Parrish, Leonid Raab. "O'Riley's Song" (Preston) by Al Colombo (music) and Alan Le May (lyrics). Wardrobe: Byron Munson. Technicolor color consultant: Mitchell Kovaleski. Assistant directors: Harry Templeton, James Paisley. Sound recording: Gene Garvin, Harry Lindgren. Producer: Alan Le May. A Le May—Templeton Production.

Copyright 31 December 1949 by Nuys Theatre Corporation. U.S. release through Eagle Lion: 1 February 1950. New York opening at the Palace: 4 May 1950. Australian release through British Empire Films: 30 November 1951. 85 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: An outlaw joins a law-abiding rancher to combat a group of cattle rustlers.

NOTES: George "Dink" Templeton directed only three features in his lifetime, of which this is the first. He followed with "Quebec" in 1951 and "A Gift for Heidi" in 1958. He also directed seven shorts from 1944 through 1946 and episodes of the TV "Rawhide" series in 1959. Most of his career was spent as an assistant director. Notable films in this capacity were Road to Singapore, The Great McGinty, Christmas in July, Ministry of Fear, The Affairs of Susan, Variety Girl and Tap Roots. The star of his first short, Trailin' West (1944), was Chill Wills. It's also interesting to note that Jack Elam also figured in the cast.

COMMENT: An odd western, filmed on actual locations in Texas, "The Sundowners" incorporates some potentially interesting story ideas with vibrant, stimulating characters, yet adds up to considerably less than the sum of its parts. Templeton's direction throughout is often regrettably loose, even weak, but the chief fault undoubtedly lies in the casting of colorless Robert Sterling in the key role of the ambivalent rancher who cannot make up his mind whether to accept or reject the outlaw's offer of help. This is a genuine dilemma, but Sterling plays the hero as such a pallid personality, we really don't care what he does.

This lack of audience identification weakens the story-line almost fatally, particularly as Robert Preston takes up the slack to make the charismatic outlaw the central focus of our attention.

John Drew Barrymore (in his movie debut) struggles gamely to regain the initiative for the good side, but is defeated by shallow writing that switches attention to yet another ambivalent character, Kathleen Boyce (the wife of a neighboring rancher), played with understandable uncertainty by Cathy Downs.

We're also never sure whether Jack Elam, who always plays bad guys, is actually on the right side in this movie. Nor do our doubts stop with the Boyces. The sheriff (Don Haggerty) is yet another player in the drama who seems to be playing both ends against the middle.

At least John Litel knows where he stands. He actually makes his confession, in fact. This is one of the film's most impressive scenes. A turning point, we feel. But then the Litel character virtually disappears, allowing Preston to ride roughshod until the final long-anticipated climax with the weak-kneed Sterling.

For all its faults, The Sundowners boasts some fine Technicolor photography, and will certainly prove a treat for Robert Preston's fans. He sings too!

OTHER VIEWS: This ambitious "B" western is almost scuttled by one fatal flaw: An audience simply cannot identify with lead characters that are weak, pallid fence-sitters who lack the drive to put their ideals into action. One or two such waverers may be tolerable in a psychological western, but this movie assembles six or seven: our hero (Sterling), brother (Barrymore), self-appointed friend (Wills), neighbor (Elam), the neighbor's wife (Downs), sheriff (Haggerty), and maybe the sheriff's dad (Litel). Far too many negatives for one movie. Only the villain radiates self-confidence. That's bad!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Above average for what it's worth.
lost-in-limbo21 January 2006
The Cloud brothers Tom and Jeff are in a mini war with some neighbouring ranchers who are stealing their cattle and want that land that they own. In these confrontations one of their ranch guys is found dead. Not too long James Cloud ('Kid Wichita') makes his way into the picture to help his brothers out on this outcome. Kid Wichita goes to any lengths to make sure that those neighbours pay back their interest. This means going out at night and herding their cattle to cover the costs, but there's more going on than that here. This situation gets more complicated when killing becomes apart of it and Tom can see his younger brother Jeff is turning out like Wichita and he doesn't see eye to eye to that. Realising now that he made a mistake by letting Wichita become apart of it, he must turn him into the law, alive or dead.

Pretty much a typical Hollywood western that seems to have put a lot effort into the production side of things (especially the Technicolor), but the story and pacing seems to be stuck in first gear throughout most of the picture. It's mostly a melodramatic and slow moving story that is rather chatty but still engaging no matter what. This is because the tough cowboy dialog between them is incredibly taut and that thrives throughout. That kind of makes up for sparse action and tension, but the momentum does picks up in the last 15 minutes with a revelation, which you have already guessed and a climatic showdown in the caverns. This is where the best moments occur. The shootout between the Cloud brothers and some rustlers up in the rocky terrains with its classic cowboy banter is fairly well staged. Like some reviewer has mentioned that really goes to the whip crazy incident. But after all of that you'll be expecting uplifting showdown between the brothers after the biting conflict amongst them earlier on, but sadly it all ends in a small whimper.

Being shot location also gives it a bit more credit. The Texas landscape helps for a nice backdrop, which makes for an easier viewing then actually just being made on sets. It one of the draw cards to make sure you keep on watching, that's for sure. Though saying that I was squinting to make out what's happening in those damn impossible moments in the dark. Some sequences felt liked they were chucked in without any thought, but that could be because of the editing. The editing was rather sharp and maybe too sharp, as some things were left open in the story with no much detail about certain scenarios that come to be. While the score was a bit over-bearing at times. But that's no real biggie. The characters in the film are well established and the performances are reasonably sound by the second-rate cast. Robert Preston as 'Kid Wichita' is the one and only enlightened character in the film. He spent most of the time amusing himself by making fun out of people he knew wouldn't fight back, well that changes. Robert Sterling as the flat Tom pales in comparison to the lively Preston and John Drew Barrymore as the younger Jeff wasn't too bad even if his performance was quite raw. Also Cathy Downs, John Litel and Jack Elam are decent in their roles.

A western that provides the usual set-up and clichés, but still mildly amusing and has a bit of style to burn.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent Western
chinaskee24 June 2001
This is a decent Western that has a couple of fine performances by Robert Preston,who makes a great bad-guy, as "Kid Wichita" and Cathy Downs,veteran of numerous Westerns,Film-noirs and Comedies,as "Kathleen Boyce".The Technicolor and the great editing are a plus,and there's also a well-done shoot-out in a canyon.This is a B-Western that's definitely worth a look.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Western that needs a re-make.
bobsluckycat1 October 2004
This was an exceptional western in it's day. Filmed on location, in Technicolor no less, with top B-list stars Robert Sterling, the bland good-guy type and Robert Preston, the evil bad-man brother with good support by Cathy Downs, John Barrymore Jr., Chill Wills, John Litel among others including Jack Elam. After viewing this again after a long while, it's obvious that the more "adult" aspects of the story were eliminated or toned down so drastically that the drama was just too tame by todays' standards, but they had the "Code" in those days. It also appears as if the studio (Eagle-Lion)may have also edited some scenes down to fit a particular running time (approx. 83 minutes). It makes no sense to spend the money they did on this film and then cut it to it's running time. If this film had a couple of the Alan Bates, Susannha York, John Hurt scenes from "The Shout" written into this "re-make" it would be more explosive and make more sense. I would also explore and expand the strong-willed father, weak son sheriff sub-plot a little more. Yes it's watchable still as is, but when we bring back the Western some day, let's re-make this one early on.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A couple of technical surprises for a lackluster western
westerner35711 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I was kind of surprised that a low budget studio like Eagle-Lion would actually fork out the cost of Technicolor film (expensive) and on-location filming in Texas (also expensive) for what is essentially an A- (minus) western. An A- western being something that had more money spent on it than a B western, but lacks the star power an "A western" would usually carry. It's not bad although the plot seems a little disjointed at times. It could be because of what an earlier reviewer had said about the studio atrociously editing down the running time of the film, even after all the money they seemed to have spent on it.

Robert Sterling and his "Younger Brother" (played by the recently departed John Drew Barrymore) are caught between competing ranch interests (led by John Litel) who want to lay claim to his land. The sheriff (Litel's son, played by Don Haggerty) even goes so far as to have one of Sterling's ranch hands killed. In walks Sterling's long lost brother, "Kid Wichita" (Robert Preston) who decides to do a little killing for his brother on his own. Sterling even weirdly agrees to it at first but then sees it getting out of hand and decides he has to kill his brother.

There is one memorable scene of Preston being whipped by one of Litel's men as he hides under a rock outcropping, then he grabs the end of the whip and the man tumbles over the ledge to his death, but otherwise this is fairly dreary stuff. Even near the end where Sterling confronts Preston in a draw only to have Sterling's ranch hand Sam Beers (Chill Wills) shoot Preston from the side, seems anti-climatic. It's as if everyone was sleepwalking through their parts, except for Chill Wills and the young Barrymore, who spends most of his time grimacing at the camera, making faces like he's trying to act too hard. But hell, he was only 18 at the time and it was his first film so I guess that's understandable.

Also notable for as an early role for Jack Elam as Earl Boyce, a neighboring rancher that Preston guns down in his own house, and Cathy Downs plays Elam's wife who may (or may not) have a thing for Sterling. That love interest looks like one of the things edited out of this film.

The Texas scenery is more interesting than the film itself and gives the viewer a break from the usual California locations that we've seen a thousand times before. VCI used a pretty good print for their DVD with minor blemishes and scratches. Considering the film stock's age, it looks in pretty good shape.

Worth a look. I'd give it a 5½ out of 10.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A western in the old tradition
headhunter4619 October 2010
I thought this was quite enjoyable. It has some interesting character developments and some realistic depictions of what I am certain people were like in the old west. Outlaws who were usually outlaws, but sometimes good guys, and lawmen who you were sometimes not sure of. There is the big rancher who wants to rule everything and the small rancher trying to survive. There is more dialog in this then most folks are used to with a western, but that is what makes it unique. The bad guy is a rascally sort who likes to tease. You find yourself not liking his teasing all the while respecting his brashness. He is ill mannered and imposing such that you have no doubts he can be unscrupulous, but he has a way of not being revolting all the same. Some reviewers were a bit put off by the amount of talking but that is what let you get behind the mentality of the characters. I liked this movie enough to watch it again soon. There is some breathtaking scenery of Texas to be seen. Enjoy.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ambitious, But Badly Executed
bkoganbing3 August 2006
It's entirely possible that the VHS that I watched of this film was badly edited because the film seemed to begin in the middle.

The Cloud Brothers, Robert Sterling and John Drew Barrymore, have settled in some country where there's a nice range war in progress. They've got both big cattle baron John Litel and a group of smaller ranchers against them. All they want to do is be left alone, but neither group will allow that.

A third brother, Robert Preston, arrives on the scene. He's a noted outlaw named Kid Wichita and he really ratchets up the violence quotient. That also includes killing the sheriff who is Litel's son and Jack Elam who's married to Cathy Downs who he's taking a fancy to.

This is a nice cast and John Drew Barrymore certainly showed he had the potential to be an earlier version of James Dean. The heritage of that name proved too much for that man though.

One of the more ambitious undertakings from Eagle-Lion Studios. But The Sundowners was flawed in the execution.

The Robert Mitchum/Deborah Kerr Sundowners was far better.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You see how the tone of this dump picks up when I'm here."
classicsoncall15 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The summary line above, spoken by James Cloud (Robert Preston) to his brother Tom (Robert Sterling) just about says it all. Jim, AKA Kid Wichita, has a way of making things happen, only trouble is, he usually leaves dead bodies where he's been. Not the sort of mentoring Tom envisions for younger brother Jeff, who likes what he sees in Jim, especially when defending their ranch against local Texas cattlemen.

The opening credits state 'Introducing John Barrymore Jr. as the Younger Brother', in this his very first screen appearance. That seemed rather odd to me, particularly since he was addressed as Jeff almost immediately into the story. Approximately eighteen at the time of this movie, he bears a passing resemblance to Sean Penn. No stranger to personal and legal problems throughout his career as well as estrangement from his family, I was left wondering if his daughter Drew Barrymore might have ever seen this picture. I'm inclined to think not.

On the subject of resemblances, I was also struck by the thought that the young Robert Sterling looked a bit like Roy Rogers early in his career. Knowing Sterling previously only from his role as George Kerby in the early 1950's TV series 'Topper', I thought he looked out of place in a Western, but that might just be me. His character becomes emboldened by his brother's resourcefulness at creating trouble, and provides some of the edginess to this not so typical story. Minor subplots abound, including the relationship rancher John Gall (John Litel) has with his son the Sheriff (who Kid Wichita kills), and the troubled marriage between Kathleen Boyce (Cathy Downs) and her husband Earl (who Kid Wichita kills). Chill Wills rounds out the main cast as one of Tom Cloud's hired hands, and figures in the somewhat predictable finale.

What's not quite predictable is how things eventually wind up there, and for that reason, this Western earns points for following a less traveled, hence not quite as formulaic a plot as a lot of good brother/bad brother Westerns do. Combined with the eclectic casting of the principals, it's one I'd recommend, even if you have to endure some of the jump cuts and sloppy editing that I experienced with my copy.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Feuding Ranchers
StrictlyConfidential6 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"The Sundowners" was originally released back in 1950.

Anyway - As the story goes - In this tale of two brothers caught on opposite sides of the law, James Cloud is the heroic and upright sibling while his brother Tom is the dastardly villain who threatens both his brother and his brother's son.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well acted story of brothers involved in a range war in the old west.
bux22 October 1998
Sterling and younger brother try to survive on land, being squeezed by big cattlemen. When 'rogue' brother Preston arrives, a moral dilemma ensues. John 'Drew' Barrymore steals the show as the younger, impressionable brother-Barrymore shows signs here that he could have been an acting powerhouse. Moves at a nice pace to an exciting climax.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This movie drags with uninteresting characters, that is remeniscent of a Western soap opera
jordondave-2808528 May 2023
(1950) The Sundowners WESTERN

Co-produced and directed by George Templeton with two brothers Tom Cloud (Robert Sterling) and just arrive gunslinger, Kid Wichita via James Cloud (Robert Preston) to defend against rustlers, before they both begin bickering over cattle and horses, whereas Tom is ethical the other brother, James is letting his gun slinging skills go to his head. And during his stay, ruthless gunfighter, James is soon idolized by the younger, Jeff (John Drew Barrymore) creating more havoc amongst the family once he begins shooting people at random. This movie drags with uninteresting characters.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
All elements are present, but it's slow
morrisonhimself30 June 2016
Despite having everything in its favor, "The Sundowners," with great cast, good story, gorgeous scenery, is still slow and tame.

No tension is ever present. I think how it will finally end is obvious rather early, but you will want to see it through, if only to test your judgment.

Robert Sterling, a good-looking and talented actor, is not someone I had associated with Westerns, but he rides like a cowboy and seems absolutely real.

Robert Preston has done everything, and I mean everything: He is probably still best known for "Professor Harold Hill" in "The Music Man" but he also was the wagon master in "How the West Was Won," and seemed right at home brandishing a whip and heading 'em up.

Chill Wills can't do much wrong. (The ad campaign for him to win an Oscar for his role in "The Alamo" was a major exception, but maybe we can't blame him for that.) His character here is an example of great writing and he, as always, pulls it off perfectly.

Cathy Downs is probably best known for the title role in the moronically a-historical "My Darling Clementine" (it is one my most disliked pieces of history twisting on film), and she died terribly young, 26 years after this film. She was a lovely and capable actress, and her character too was different and an example of good writing.

Her character was the wife of the one played by Jack Elam, who had a different role for him. You might want to watch "The Sundowners" just to see Jack Elam in this unusual part, and to see how talented an actor he was.

John Litel was a veteran performer, and always so believable, whether on horseback or as Thomas Jefferson or as the boss of the Secret Service. He is one of my favorite character actors -- which means one of my favorite actors.

That writing, by the way, was by veteran Alan LeMay (known here as Alan Le May), perhaps best known for "The Searchers."

God bless 'em, but Westerns on the Web has this available at YouTube and you should be quick to grab a chance to watch. At no time will you be on the edge of your seat, but you will admire the more than capable cast especially against some of the best scenery Texas has.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Younger brother chooses between 'good' and 'bad' brothers to emulate.
weezeralfalfa3 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
One of the main plot threads that runs through most of this Technicolor 1950 western is the question of whether younger brother Jeff((John Drew Barrymore) is going to continue to emulate brother Tom(Robert Sterling), who runs a legitimate cattle ranch in Texas, or brother James(Robert Preston), commonly referred to as Wichita. who is landless, and seems to roam around doing odd legitimate and illegitimate jobs. In contrast to the serious disposition of Tom, Wichita seems laid back, always chuckling, confident of himself, and of his popularity with women, as demonstrated by his pawing of Mrs. Kathy Boyce in her home, with her husband Earl(Jack Elam) absent......Against his better judgement, Tom finally accepts Wichita as a temporary member of his team, deciding that he needs a forceful leader in his battle with rustlers. But, besides protecting Tom's cattle from being stolen, Wichita and his small gang, including brother Jeff, engage in some rustling of their own. He kills one of the hands of neighbor John Gall, caught rustling with several others. Then, he sneaks into the sheriff's office afterhours and assassinates Sheriff Gall: son of John Gall. Apparently, he had connected the enemy rustlers, who had just exited from the sheriff's office, with Gall, and decided to cut off the head of the dragon. Interestingly, Father Gall decided to appoint himself the new sheriff! Then, he sneaked into the house of Earl and Kathy Boyce, and assassinated Earl, who was sitting at the kitchen table. It was not crystal clear why he did this, as Earl was not connected with the rustling. Probably, he wanted to eliminate Earl as a possible witness to his rumored killing of Tom's previous foreman, in a night raid. Also, possibly he wanted to eliminate him as Kathy's husband.......Then, there is the climactic shootout between Gall's rustlers and Wichita's gang plus Tom and Sam(Chill Wills), who arrived later. Brother Jeff is seriously wounded, and captured. But each of the brothers, including Jeff, kills one of the 3 rustlers. Tom takes Jeff to his cabin for recovery, and vows he will bring Wichita in to the new sheriff(meaning he will kill him), for his presumed(although unproven) guilt in killing the Sheriff and Earl Boyce. A second climax event happens when Wichita shows up at Tom's house, where Tom, Sam, Jeff, and Kathy are waiting. The atmosphere is tense, as the men spread themselves out some meters apart. One gun is pulled from it's holster, quickly followed by several others. Soon, one man is dead.....We wonder the fate of Tom. Is he arrested as an accomplice to Wichita's murders? Does he leave the area, as several have suggested? Does Kathy leave the area, as threatening to do?. Do Tom and Kathy resume their secret romantic dallying, now that she is a widow? Does brother Jeff resume his role as a hand for Tom, now that Wichita is dead? Or does he continue to seek a life like Wichita's....... As frequently cast, Robert Preston's character of Wichita doesn't seem all bad. He did his job of eliminating the rustling, but his methods weren't approved by the legal establishment, nor the town's people. Another classic example of a Preston character who is partly good and partly bad is seen in the Cecil DeMille epic "Union Pacific"......The action was filmed on site at several locations in north Texas, including Palo Dura Canyon, sometimes providing rather spectacular settings for battles or roaming.......See it at YouTube..Don't confuse this film with the 1960 film of the same title, but with quite a different setting and story.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
unusually good
loydmooney-11 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those westerns that, well, stands practically alone in the unrelieved quality of its dialog. Very few can hold up to it over the long haul. That said, the rest is pretty bad. Nevertheless I am giving it an eight because there is no other western with such consistently good dialog with maybe the exception of The Wild Bunch, Junior Bonner, and perhaps a few more.

It is riddled with weaknesses, John Drew Barrimore the most glaring. However it does have one truly memorable scene. Nothing like it. Its right after Kid Wichita kills the sheriff, and goes to Jack Elams place trying to goad him into a fight. Wonderful stuff. Right up with the best in any western.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Downside Of Fighting Fire With Fire
FightingWesterner27 December 2009
Peaceful rancher Robert Sterling is on the losing side of a range war with his ruthless neighbors, that is until notorious outlaw Robert Preston shows up out of the blue to level the playing field. Soon he begins to go too far, feeding a growing sense of unease in Sterling, especially when his son begins to idolize the wily criminal.

The Sundowners is a tightly-paced, gritty, and surprisingly tough little picture with a great performance by Preston. Here, he comes across as an evil version of Shane, that is until the real nature of the rancher and the outlaw's relationship is revealed. Most movie guides and video boxes spoil the surprise!

Rounding out the cast is Chill Wills, Jack Elam, and the debut of John Drew Barrymore, who became more famous for his offspring than his acting.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An old, obscure Western that pulsates with authenticity (in more ways than one)
Wuchakk9 April 2018
RELEASED IN 1950 and directed by George Templeton, "The Sundowners" is a Western taking place in the Texas panhandle where honest rancher Tom Cloud (Robert Sterling) and his teenage brother (John Drew Barrymore) are having a difficult time with dubious Sheriff Elmer Gall (Don Haggerty) and some rustlers. When supposed outlaw Kid Wichita (Robert Preston) comes back to town, however, he starts cleaning up the county, which earns the ire of the sheriff and the rustlers. Chill Wills plays a kindly neighbor while John Litel appears as the sheriff's father, who's (apparently) unaware of his son's questionable activities.

NOTE: This shouldn't be confused with the 1960 movie of the same name about Australian sheep drovers starring Robert Mitchum and Deborah Kerr.

While "The Sundowners" is a small, obscure Western, it's one of my favorites because of its interesting characters, engaging writing and palpable realism. As far as the latter goes, it was actually shot in the Texas panhandle, rather than Arizona or Southern Cal like too many old Westerns.

Someone criticized the movie on the grounds that he "had a hard time figuring who was good and who was bad," which illustrates another element of realism: The characters have shades of grey rather than being wholly black or white. Even the main protagonist, Tom Cloud, who represents wisdom and goodness, reveals an imprudent side, which I'm not going to give away. Of course the people involved in the rustling ring are definitely shady, albeit secretly. The father of the ringleader, however, isn't corrupt and didn't know what his son was doing, although he might have suspected and turned a blind eye.

Kid Wichita, however, is somewhere in between black and white, mainly due to his dubious past and the leery way Tom regards his return. Wichita amusingly says a few times: "From Amarillo to Gee Whit, nobody never proved a thing on me - 'cept twice," which means he committed at least two actual crimes in the past and obviously more.

In the current events of the movie, though, I didn't see Wichita do anything wrong. All he does is help rid the county of a rustling ring. There are several references to Wichita murdering someone but, actually, he caught the individual scheming and didn't shoot until the guy went for his gun. That's not murder; it's self-defense. The same thing happens in another situation. Personally, I was all for Wichita cleaning up the county of the rustling trash. Maybe Wichita deserves to die for his past sins, but not for anything he does in this movie.

Kid Wichita, by the way, is an excellent example of a classic antihero before antiheroes came into vogue with Leone's (overrated) spaghetti Westerns in the mid-60s. Wichita is a bold gunslinger who oozes confidence and la Joie de vivre (French for "the joy of living"), not to mention recognizes and fearlessly confronts true corruption (evil), which is usually hidden. The boy (Barrymore) naturally starts to look up to Wichita and emulates him. This brings to mind the best succinct line: "Why sure!"

Jack Elam is featured in a peripheral role as an unloving husband in one of his first films at the age of 29 (during shooting). Most people understandably view Elam as a likable human-looking gargoyle so it's interesting to see him as a relatively good-looking young man. On the female front Cathy Downs (the titular character in 1946' "My Darling Clementine") has a pretty meaty part as Elam's hot redhead wife, who naturally looks for romance elsewhere.

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour 23 minutes and was shot in the Texas panhandle (Palo Duro Canyon State Park and ranches near Canyon, Stinnett and Amarillo) with studio work done at Universal Studios, CA. WRITER: Alan LeMay.

GRADE: A
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Choppy, but Good to Look At
dougdoepke9 August 2010
Plot-- Mysterious Kid Wichita arrives to help two brothers Tom and Jeff defend their ranch from cattle rustlers. Trouble is the Kid creates more problems than he solves. So why does straight arrow Tom put up with him.

Anyone doubting that Texas has a scenic part needs to see this Western. The Palo Dura Canyon in the Texas panhandle looks like a smaller version of the Grand Canyon of Arizona and makes an eye-catching backdrop. In fact, the movie skillfully weaves the action into the red rock slabs, especially the big shoot-out, bull whip and all.

There're a lot of cross currents to the plot, making the story sometimes difficult to follow, but the central characters—Preston and Sterling—remain clearly drawn. The script only fills in important information in dribs and drabs, which means we have to keep up with why some people are doing what they do as best we can. Thus some patience is needed, but I think it does pay off.

Preston is obviously enjoying his charming bad-guy role, playing it for all it's worth. His Kid Wichita may be one of the biggest, most booming, personalities in Western annals and probably the only singing villain. Wisely, his opposite number, Sterling, underplays his part as Tom, the reluctant good guy. This makes for a good dramatic contrast and helps build tension for the inevitable showdown. Apparently, Jack Elam helped get financing for the film (IMDB) and so got his first acting part. He sounds a little shaky, but then his cuckolded husband, Earl, is supposed to be. And, of course, there's Chill Wills lending his reliable "aw- shucks" brand of character color.

Anyway, there's a lot of entertainment in both the scenery and the characters, making this a generally under-rated little Western.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed