Man in the Saddle (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Rancho Skulduggery.
hitchcockthelegend5 April 2014
Man in the Saddle is directed by Andre De Toth and adapted to screenplay by Kenneth Gamet from the novel written by Ernest Haycox. It stars Randolph Scott, Joan Leslie, John Russell, Ellen Drew, Alexander Knox, Richard Rober and Guinn Williams. Music is by George Duning and cinematography by Charles Lawton Jr.

More known and rightly lauded for the series of Western films he made with Budd Boetticher, it often gets forgotten that Randolph Scott also had a long working relationship with Andre De Toth. Man in the Saddle was the first of six Western films the two men would make together, and it's a pretty impressive start.

Sometimes you see words such as routine and standard attributed to a lot of Westerns from the 1950s, and Man in the Saddle is one such film that's unfairly tarred with that brush. Not that the narrative drive is out of the ordinary, the plot essentially sees Randy as a peaceful farmer forced to get nasty when evil land baron flexes his muscles, but the zest of the action, the stunt work, the colour photography (Lone Pine as always a Mecca for Western fans) and Scott, mark this out as a thoroughly entertaining production.

Characterisations carry a bit more psychological smarts than your average "B" Western of the era. There's a four way tug-of-love-war operating that is clearly going to spell misery, pain and death for somebody, a capitalist slant that bites hard with its egotistical bully boy overtones, while the obsessive behaviour of the principal players adds another dark cloud over this part of the West. Then there is the action scenes, of which De Toth once again shows himself to be a darn fine purveyor of such directional skills.

And so, we get an ace runaway blazing wagon sequence, a stampede, a quite brilliant gunfight in a darkened saloon, a mano-mano fist fight that literally brings the house down – and then continues down a steep ravine, and the closing shoot-out played out during a dust storm doesn't lack for adrenaline rushes. Scott is once again a bastion of Western coolness, more so when he throws off the bright attire he wears for the first half of film, to then switch to black clothes that signifies he's going all bad ass on those who have caused him grief.

Undervalued for sure, both as a Scott picture and as a Western movie in general. Don't believe the routine and standard scare mongers, there's good craft here and it's a whole bunch of Oater fun. 7.5/10
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Range War Western
bkoganbing2 December 2005
Big rancher Alexander Knox has married Joan Leslie former girlfriend of smaller rancher Randolph Scott. Knox is a brooding jealous sort of man and wants Scott out the territory. He hires some gunslingers headed by Richard Rober to do the job.

Scott's a 'peaceable man' in the tradition of Wild Bill Elliott, but don't provoke him too much. But Knox is determined to start a range war out of jealousy.

It becomes an open war after Rober kills brothers Cameron Mitchell and Richard Crane who work for Scott. And the wild part is that Scott's now taken a fancy to Ellen Drew.

A previous reviewer said that Alexander Knox was miscast in a western. True he isn't a typical western actor, but a whole lot of people went west to make names for themselves of all kinds. Knox does a good job of the brooding and jealous rancher with a deep seated inferiority complex.

Now it's also true that Richard Rober is a little too nattily dressed for a villain, but that sure is a western stereotype. I think he made a very good villain in this western. Rober was tragically killed in an automobile accident soon after this picture was finished. A good career in villainy was cut short.

A lot of plot similarities to this and The Violent Men also done by Columbia Pictures a few years later. It's a good entry from the Randolph Scott western collection.
25 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than I was led to believe
Marlburian21 January 2015
Some of the reviews here nearly dissuaded me from watching this film, which doesn't seem to have been screened much on British TV (certainly I was unaware of it), whereas the Boetticcher and other later Scott Westerns are shown regularly.

"MITS" compared very well indeed with these, and the plot was different to those of "stranger riding into town and trouble"). It's been remarked that Scott was a bit old for the two female leads, but that was the case in many of his later Westerns (and Gary Cooper's too). The colour photography also added to my enjoyment of the film. It was good to see Guinn Williams in a role that wasn't his "comic sidekick" one, and also John Russell as a jealous admirer. Joan Leslie's romantic vacillations were a bit unconvincing, as were the final scenes.

Unlike at least one previous reviewer, I didn't notice the differing appearances of Scott and his fight stand-in, and I doubt that cinema viewers in the early 1950s did either.

(I've just checked the date of release, and was a little surprised, as the film had the "look" of one made late in the decade or even the early 1960s.)

I'm glad that I watched it.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Randy gets the proper girl
peteoliver-908455 June 2022
Good yarn, nasty baddies and strong goodies with great scenery and a terrific punch up in the mountains - sorry for grandpas cabin. Randolph Scott in one of his better movies.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The first Scott-Brown production
HotToastyRag24 July 2021
Man in the Saddle could be looked at as just another Randolph Scott western, but for one noteworthy difference: it's the first movie produced by Scott-Brown Productions. The rest is history, and thankfully, the gamble to leave mainstream Hollywood paid off: Randolph Scott westerns were some of the most popular movies of the decade!

The story of this one is fairly straightforward: Scottie McScottie Pants and Alexander Knox battle it out over a girl. You might think it's not a fair fight, since Scottie is a western superstar, and Alex usually plays ministers. However, Alex has one thing Scottie doesn't, and it's important: money. The object of their affection, Joan Leslie, values money and all it can buy, so she leaves Scottie for Alex. Does she ever regret her decision? You'll have to watch this ninety minute brawl to find out. It's not ninety minutes of pure fighting, of course; but the gigantic fight scene in the end is extremely impressive. Keep an eye out for Ellen Drew, Guinn "Big Boy" Williams, John Russell, and a young Cameron Mitchell in the supporting cast.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Randy Scott western but should have been much better
krorie30 December 2005
Though "Man in the Saddle" has some effective moments and a few good action scenes, it is below average for Randy Scott who usually did better. The high point of the action comes near the beginning of the movie when the cattle are stampeded with Randy trying to outrun the herd in a covered wagon that is ablaze. The shoot out at the end is much too abbreviated only lasting a few minutes. Randy doesn't even get to duke it out with the hired gunslinger Fay Dutcher (Richard Rober). What kind of name is Fay for a gunfighter? Owen Merritt (Scott) shoots Dutcher as he rolls for his gun in the street. The talented actor John Russell has a fairly nondescript role. He would have been much better cast as gunman Dutcher.

The story of a love triangle with two women Joan Leslie and Ellen Drew after one man (Scott)is at times overplayed. Exactly what Owen's relationship was with Laurie Bidwell (Leslie) before she married Will Isham (Alexander Knox) for money and power is never revealed. Apparently the two had one hell of a relationship the way it still tugs at their heartstrings and is the continued buzz of the town. The hired gun is not just after more ranch land for his boss but after Owen as well.

Alexander Knox who played President Woodrow Wilson magnificently in "Wilson" several years earlier was thus typecast and unable to find himself in other parts. When he played the boss rancher in "Man in the Saddle" he was still trying to find his way after Wilson. Alfonso Bedoya and veteran cowboy actor Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams do well in the comedy department. Bedoya is a good foil for Big Boy. He continually looks for a new hat. Big Boy tells him he doesn't need a new hat for his head, he needs a new head for a hat. Even Randy Scott gets in on the humor this time and comes across with some funny lines. When Bedoya tells Scott that the trees are talking to him. Scott replies, "You'd better lay off that vanilla extract." When he is hold up with Nan Melotte (Ellen Drew)recuperating from a gunshot wound he feels the stubble on his face and comments, "It's like a coyote running through brush." The usually serious Scott plays a lighter role this go around and it is a plus for this otherwise dark and moody film. Look for Cameron Mitchell of television's "The High Chaparral" in a small part as one of the two brothers murdered by Will Isham's gang.

In the days before Tex Ritter gave immortality to the theme from "High Noon," showing Hollywood how cowboy music should be presented to the public, multi-talented Tennessee Ernie Ford sang the theme to "Man in the Saddle" with much the same feeling of authenticity. He also gets to sing another ballad on camera as one of the wranglers. He's hard to recognize at first because of his youth and no mustache. Tennessee Ernie was singing hillbilly boogie that sounded very much like Rockabilly when Elvis was still driving a truck in Memphis. He ended up concentrating mainly on television, retiring early from show business, except to cut a gospel album every now and then. "Man in the Saddle" is one of his few screen appearances.

Though not up to par for a Randolph Scott western, still worth seeing for fans of 50's westerns.
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"There's no woman in the world worth tearing yourself apart for."
utgard1424 July 2014
Joan Leslie loves Randolph Scott but marries wealthy Alexander Knox. The super jealous Knox isn't satisfied having Joan; he also wants Scott dead. So he hires gunmen to kill him. Scott survives the attack and is nursed back to health by Ellen Drew, who's in love with him. Once better he sets out to settle things with Knox and his hired guns. So-so western soaper has a nice cast but doesn't rise above average. Scott's fine, as is most of the cast. Hard to buy sweet Joan Leslie as hard and ambitious. This is one of those westerns where the good guy wears a bright yellow neckerchief and the bad guy wears black gloves. Watchable but forgettable.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
About As Good As A 'B' Western Gets
damianphelps7 March 2021
I really enjoyed this. Most of Scott's films are pretty similar, however in this one its nice to see him commit to the fight much earlier on than he normally does.

Plenty of good action and some well put together characters.

Its interesting to me that they made the head bad guy British, it set a different tone, "I don't belong here so I'll force my way'. This miss fitting gave the character strength and weakness.

The head henchman was a little lacking, good verbally but not given any great opportunities. The other independent lead henchman was also wasted a little and could have added more.

Great film :)
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The man who had to own everything and everybody
weezeralfalfa22 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Not the most original nor interesting Scott western I've seen. Like various other reviewers have said, Alexander Knox just seems out of his tree as a cattle baron. I can see why he made a good Woodrow Wilson, or perhaps a good bank president, for example. John Russell would have made a much more believable Will Isham, but then he couldn't have taken part in that marathon brawl with Scott unless the script were rewritten. Similarly, Richard Rober made an unconvincing gunslinger in looks, although his target practice in the saloon was quite impressive. I'm still not positive whether Rober was trying to kill Scott(probably) or Isham, or both, when he burst into the building as Scott and Isham were descending the stairs. Scott ducked back to safety, and Isham, in front, shifted over to where Scott had been, when the revolver fired. That was 3 murders Rober was credited with, and he tried to make Scott number 4. Their shootout continued into the street, where a very strong wind complicated things a bit. Guess who eventually prevailed.

Returning to the brawl between Scott and Russell, not only did they destroy the breakaway furniture, they caused the breakaway cabin they were in to collapse! Very lucky they weren't buried under the rubble! They continued their fight over the romantic attention of Ellen Drew down a very steep slope next to a stream, with Ellen tumbling down the slope behind with a rifle. Russell finally managed to get on his horse for a get away before he got shot.

Another cliffhanger is when Scott was driving a chuck wagon, trying to outrun a cattle stampede, and the lantern in the back fell off and started a fire. He continued to drive the wagon until it was about to burn him up, when he unhitched the wagon at full speed and apparently jumped off just before what was left was wrecked.

The ending is rather unsatisfactory to me. What became of the Scott-Joan Leslie romantic relationship after Isham was murdered? Was she now damaged goods, so that a Scott-Joan union could not occur to combine their resources? Did Joan sell out to Scott or someone else? It appeared that Scott favored Ellen Drew at the end. She was a decade older than Joan, who was only half Scott's age.

During sizable chunks of the film, I hardly understood what was going on, riding around here and there, often in the dark.

Currently available at YouTube
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An Okay Randolph Scott Western
Uriah4316 March 2022
This film begins with a rancher by the name of "Owen Merritt" (Randolph Scott) attempting to adjust to the realization that his former girlfriend "Laurie Bidwell" (Joan Leslie) has recently agreed to marry an unscrupulous businessman named "Will Isham" (Alexander Knox) in the very near future. And although Will knows Laurie is entering their marriage strictly for financial reasons, he is also aware that she still has feelings for Owen. Because of that, he becomes even more intent to take everything else Owen has as well. What he doesn't realize, however, is that Owen isn't the type who can be bullied and he is more than capable of taking care of himself if he is pushed too far. Now, rather than reveal any more I will just say that this turned out to be an okay Western for the most part which benefited by solid performances by Randolph Scott, Joan Leslie and Ellen Drew (as "Nan Melotte"). On that note, I must admit that the relationship between Owen and Laurie seemed rather odd at times but other than that this film managed to pass the time fairly well and I have rated it accordingly. Average.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Among Scott's Better Oaters
dougdoepke16 October 2014
Average Scott western, at best. There're some darn fine Lone Pine vistas that aren't usually seen, plus mountain scenes from southern Sierras. That's one thing about well-produced westerns— the scenery can sustain even when all else falters. Scott, of course, is Scott, strong-jawed and humorless, carrying the film even when the congested script doesn't. The plot's pretty familiar, rich landowner taking over hero's land, along with a number of subplots. Then too, we've got not just one ingénue, but two. Leslie and Drew may be malt shop girls from the 40's but they do well enough here. I'm glad their hair color differs, otherwise they would be hard to tell apart.

I'm with those who think Rober and Knox too bland to compete with Scott. Also, I agree that Russell would have made a much more vivid villain; too bad he's wasted in what looks like a tacked-on role. And catch how easily Bedoya goes from clown to menace, even without "stinkin' badges". I really did expect sharper results from ace director DeToth. Given the right material, he can be quite affecting, as his western masterpiece Ramrod (1948) proves. As Andrew Sarris points out, few movie makers had a better feel for human treachery than the eye-patch Hungarian. My guess is he regarded the script as little more than a vehicle for Scott, though a few nice fringe touches do emerge, such as the straggler who gets in the way of the showdown.

All in all, the oater's too sprawling in both cast and story to achieve anything more than a scenic time passer.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"You're Hurt Again, Don't You Ever Learn...?"
richardchatten10 December 2019
The title is a bit of a misnomer - despite the title song - since little of the action actually takes place on horseback. It's more a tale of intrigue in a western setting enhanced by a good cast (although Alexander Knox is rather wasted as the senior villain; and soon returned to Britain).

Cameraman Charles Lawton puts his experience in film noir to good use by creating atmospheric lighting effects indoors and occasionally outdoors in rich Technicolor; while Andre De Toth's creation of compositions and action in depth utilising objects and actors within the frame amply demonstrates why - despite having only the one eye - he was soon afterwards entrusted with the 3D 'House of Wax'.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of Scott's Better 1950s Westerns!
bsmith555220 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Man in the Saddle" contains a love triangle, a ruthless wealthy rancher, a vicious gunfighter and a fight worthy of star Randolph Scott's fight with John Wayne in "The Spoilers" (1942).

Will Isham (Alexander Knox) is about to marry local gold digger Laurie Bidwell (Joan Leslie) who had once been involved with local rancher Owen Merritt (Scott). It seems that Laurie has found greener pastures with the rich and powerful Isham. At the wedding, Laurie banishes her drunken father (Don Beddoe) being ashamed of him.

Merritt along with other small ranchers Bourk Prine (Guinn "Big Boy" Williams) and the aging Lankershim (Clem Bevans) are targets for take over by Isham's Skull Ranch. The old man gives in and sells out making The Skull Ranch and Merritt's spread neighbors. Another neighboring small rancher Nan Melotte (Ellen Drew) has her eye on Merritt but is loved from afar by the mysterious Hugh Clagg (John Russell). Isham has hires gunman Dutcher (Richard Rober) to do his dirty work.

Dutcher and his men stampede the cattle of the small ranchers killing young Juke Vird, a Merritt hand, in the process. Juke's brother George (Cameron Mitchell) vows revenge but is also killed when he hoes after Dutcher. Dutcher attacks Merritt's ranch wounding him. Merritt is taken to a mountain hide out by Nan for protection.

Nan in advertently stands up Clagg for a date and he becomes furious. He tracks them to the isolated cabin and threatens to kill both Nan and Merritt. A fierce battle between the men breaks out with Merritt prevailing. Clegg returns to the Isham ranch but is brutally gunned down by Isham when he believes that Clagg was pursuing his wife.

The Skull Ranch riders head for town for a showdown with Owen Merritt and his followers. A gunfight ensues and Merritt ultimately gets Isham to agree to pull up stakes and move on just as Dutcher arrives and......................................................

Yep, that was Tennessee Ernie Ford (sans mustache) singing the title song and appearing at a campfire scene doing likewise. The fight scene between Scott and Russell (and their stunt doubles) was particularly well done. IThey bring the whole cabin down upon themselves as well as tumbling down a steep hill in battle. Scott is as somber and serious as always. Even though he was into his 50s, he still got to romance to young lovelies much younger than himself. Gunin Williams doesn't play the comical side kick this time but a more serious role. John Russell and Cameron Mitchell appear in early roles and the ever popular Alfonso Bedoya appears as the camp cook.

And yes, Randolph Scott wears his traditional leather jacket worn in many of his westerns, in this one too.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very disappointing!
JohnHowardReid17 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Randolph Scott (Owen Merritt), Joan Leslie (Laurie Bidwell), Ellen Drew (Nan Melotte), Alexander Knox (Will Isham), Richard Rober (Fay Dutcher), John Russell (Hugh Clagg), Alfondo Bedoya (Cultus Charlie), Guinn "Big Boy" Williams (Bourke Prine), Clem Bevans (Pay Lankershim), Cameron Mitchell (George Virk), Richard Crane (Duke Virk), Frank Sully (Lee Repp), Don Beddoe (Love Bidwell), George Lloyd (Tom Croker), James Kirkwood (Sheriff Medary), Frank Hagney (Ned Bale), Frank Ellis (townsman), Tennessee Ernie Ford (wrangler).

Director: ANDRE DE TOTH. Screenplay: Kenneth Gamet. Based on the novel by Ernest Haycox. Photographed in Technicolor by Charles Lawton, junior. Film editor: Charles Nelson. Art director: George Brooks. Set decorator: Frank Tuttle. Technicolor color consultant: Francis Cugat. Music: George Duning. Songs: Harold Lewis (music) and Ralph Murphy (lyrics). Music director: Morris Stoloff. Assistant to the producer: Herbert Stewart. Assistant director: Willard Reineck. Sound recording: Frank Goodwin. Associate producer: Randolph Scott. Producer: Harry Joe Brown. Executive producers: Harry Joe Brown, Randolph Scott.

A Scott-Brown Production, released through Columbia Pictures. Copyright 7 December 1951 by Producers Actors Corporation. No recorded New York opening. U.S. release: 2 December 1951. U.K. release: 28 June 1952. Australian release: 11 September 1952. 87 minutes.

U.K. release title: The OUTCAST.

SYNOPSIS: Owen Merritt, a small rancher, has to stand aside and see his ambitious girlfriend, Laurie Bidwell, marry a wealthy neighbor, Will Isham. Laurie's heart, however, is still with Owen. When Isham realizes this, he determines to destroy his rival.

COMMENT: This promising theme is none too well handled by a group of first-class technicians who should have known better than fall back on such old-fashioned devices as under-cranking the camera to speed up the action. Although well-motivated, the script also fails to deliver. The story develops into one long gun-fight, with brief interludes of talkative peace. The lovely Ellen Drew is wasted as Scott's also-ran love interest.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"It's a little warm in there, Mister."
classicsoncall15 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Here's a Randolph Scott Western with a very perplexing ending. The character of Laurie Bidwell Isham (Joan Leslie) was so inconsistent it managed to spoil what could have been an effective story. OK, she married Will Isham (Alexander Knox) for his wealth and ambition after throwing over Owen Merritt (Scott), the laid back rancher. Having second thoughts about the whole thing made sense, but after she planned to run off with Owen and then opted to stay with the heel, that just ripped it. For the writers, it seemed like a necessary angle for Scott's character to close the deal with Nan Melotte (Ellen Drew), but it should have been handled a lot more cleverly. Oh well.

Otherwise the story moved along at a nice pace and delivered it's share of action and suspense. One thing that seems virtually impossible to me though, and it's happened in a handful of Westerns I've seen, is how easily one can disengage the hitch on a runaway wagon the way Owen did in this one. It's often done with railroad cars as well, and I bet if you tried it yourself you'd strike out a hundred out of a hundred times because of the pressure forces at work.

I saw John Russell's name in the opening credits and darn if I didn't recognize him when he showed up as the taciturn henchman Hugh Clagg. The picture staged a fairly impressive one on one between Russell and Scott, that had to be carried outside after the cabin they were in fell apart. Seriously, you have to see it for yourself. They had a nice tumble down the hillside as well, but I had to wonder why Clagg's horse would have been waiting for him where he landed to make a getaway. Just like I wondered how Owen and Nan managed to drive their wagon up the mountain in the first place. If there was a clear trail to that cabin, why didn't Clagg use it to get there?

But tell you what, Randolph Scott didn't let me down in the wardrobe department. He donned his trademark all black outfit for the final showdown with the baddies, complementing it with a nice bandanna flourish. Bad guy Isham didn't make it to the end of the picture, so you're left to wonder whether Laurie wound up selling out to Merritt after he closes with Nan in a clinch. And steenkin' badges aside, Alfonso Bedoya fulfills his picture long wish to get a new hat.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Randolph Scott takes on Skull Ranch and its owner, the jealous megalomaniac Will Isham
Terrell-43 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
There's a small lake that straddles the boundary separating Will Isham's Skull Ranch and Pay Lankershim's land. Isham (Alexander Knox), a powerful, determined and jealous megalomaniac, offers $50,000 cash if Pay sells his ranch to him this night, Isham's wedding night. It's worth maybe $9,000. There's enough water for both our herds, Pay says. "You don't get the idea," Isham says with a tumbler of brandy in his hand. "I'd only own half a lake. I don't own half of anything, Lankershim. I own it all, lock, stock and barrel. That goes for anything. Whatever I have is mine and mine alone. I'll share with no one."

Now Skull's boundary is up against Owen Merritt's land...and it will only be a matter of time before Isham goes after Owen (Randolph Scott). He's even brought in a hired gun to speed things along. And the woman Isham just married? Turns out Laurie Bidwell (Joan Leslie) is the woman Owen loves. She made her choice, however, because she wanted position and money, and that meant Isham, not Owen. After Owen nearly gets killed in a stampede engineered by Isham's men, Laurie is beginning to have doubts about her choice. She'd better remember what Isham told Pay: "Whatever I have is mine alone. I'll share with no one."

When Owen's men start getting killed, he decides to do some killing of his own. It's not long before it's just Owen Merritt against the power of Skull, and that means Will Isham and his hired guns. Thank goodness Owen has a few loyal ranch hands and one friend, spunky, feisty Nan Melotte, the blonde young owner of a small ranch next to Owen's. We know things are going to get much rougher in the next hour.

Man in the Saddle may be a B western, but it's a Randolph Scott B western. With me, that usually means a strong story even with clichés, most often a good villain or two, enough action to quickly pass the time and, of course, Scott. He was a big guy who could come across as grim, judgmental and dead serious. He also had perfected the persona of an honorable man of action. He had the screen presence to carry even B westerns. He had no trouble dominating his films, even when playing against an alpha male like Lee Marvin. I've always found a good deal of pleasure watching a Randolph Scott western.

Joan Leslie has a much more complicated character to play than most B movie westerns call for. Her Laurie Isham comes from a hardscrabble past. She loves, in her way, Owen. She marries Isham because she yearns for position and security. She winds up trying to be loyal to both. Leslie manages to carry it off so well we sort of admire Laurie and how she's trying to handle the fix she's put herself in. To see Joan Leslie at her freshest and friendliest, find a copy of The Sky's the Limit. At barely 18 she stars opposite Fred Astaire and shares a fast, funny song and dance routine with him, "A Lot in Common with You." Leslie just about keeps up with Astaire and he makes it seem easy for her. When she can manage just two air-borne turns (which she does with grace and precision), he hits three but places himself just a little in front of her to disguise the difference.

For those fond of pound-'em-into-the-ground fistfights, Man in the Saddle features a lulu. Scott and John Russell, an equally big guy who plays a man with a vicious temper who has a hankerin' for Nan, start walloping each other in a mountain shack, then slip-slide down a rocky, snow covered mountainside going after each other with fists, rocks and tree limbs. The stunt doubles earned their money with this one.

Man in the Saddle is no classic, but it turns out to be one of the better westerns Scott made during this period.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In the saddle
TheLittleSongbird13 November 2022
While the Western genre is not one of my favourite film genres, there is still appreciation for it and there are many classics in it. Also like Randolph Scott, though not a favourite, with some of his best work being with Budd Boetticher, and it was interesting to see him atypically cast as part of a love triangle. Andre De Toth was a very gifted director, with already good experience with Westerns (the genre he revisited most frequently), and sadly undervalued. Those were the main reasons for seeing 'Man in the Saddle'.

Can totally understand the division in opinions here, considering that the premise is one of those could go either way ones and won't connect for some, but count me in as someone who liked if not loved 'Man in the Saddle'. It's not one of the best Westerns out there and not quite one of Scott's better collaborations with De Toth (both also doing better individually), but neither are disgraced either. While an uneven film, there is also a lot to recommend about 'Man in the Saddle'.

Those good things are going to be mentioned first. The Technicolor is absolutely marvellous, especially in the night scenes, and the scenery sweeps majestically. The score rouses and doesn't sound stock or overbearing. De Toth directs with real confidence (the experience in the genre showing) and is in full control of and ease with the material. The script is generally taut and lean, going at a natural flow. Actually did think there was tension, especially in the terrific fight scene with John Russell and the climax.

Scott is very strong in the lead role, with exactly the right amount of grit and swagger and he has the right amount of charm to be convincing romantically. Joan Leslie is charming as the love interest and any scenes with her don't slow the film down. John Russell is one of two standouts of the rest of the cast, even with a stock role he is still very sinister and eerily tight lipped and makes the most of what he is given. The other is the very funny comic relief from Alfonso Bedoya, who looks as though he was enjoying himself and the humour is not overused, forced or out of place.

Not all the cast work however. Absolutely agree that Alexander Knox and Richard Roper are very bland, especially Knox as a character that was a real missed opportunity. On paper, the character had potential to be the most psychologically interesting, but ended up merely being the cliched one dimensional romantic rival. Roper is not remotely believable as a villain physically or dramatically, with no menace at all (whenever it is tried it never looks natural and looks rather prompted). Also felt that Ellen Drew had next to nothing to work with and what she is given is pretty weak and syrupy sweet, Drew has the right amount of allure but the dull, thankless material works against her.

Didn't completely buy the romantic rivalry, not because of it being implausible or creepy or anything like that (it was neither), the inconsistent acting and that it doesn't feel developed enough bring it down. Some of the dialogue could have been tighter and parts are soapy and stilted like with Drew.

Concluding, pretty good but not great. 7/10.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Man in the Saddle
henry8-36 May 2021
Rancher Knox is marrying Scott's girl and is also eager to take over all the land around him, including Scott's ranch - trouble follows.

Standard, possibly slightly better than expected western fare with the usual stuff taking place when there's a battle for land. One very good, tough fight scene though and Scott has, as usual, a strong screen presence.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent oater
funkyfry1 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I have to say this is one of the better Randolph Scott pictures that I've seen from his career previous to the "Ranown" films. It has a much more compelling story than a lot of standard oaters from the 40s and 50s, with not one but two interesting female characters.

Scott plays Owen Merritt, a tough rancher who is provoked into a range war by the uber-competitive Will Isham (Alexander Knox). Isham has married a former flame of Merritt's (Joan Leslie) and can't stand the thought that she might have residual feelings for Merritt. Also in the mix is the more tomboyish Ellen Drew who plays a neighboring rancher who helps Merritt and falls in love with him.

There's a very interesting social subtext to the story with the two women -- the Leslie character is from a poor rural background but wants to escape her history, while the Drew character is more grounded and self-aware and doesn't want to run from her own life. The Knox character is also interesting, psychotic and yet noble. Richard Rober plays the more coldhearted gunslinger who he hires to do his dirty work, and the dynamic between Rober and Knox is interesting as well.

I quite enjoyed it and will gladly watch it again. It's not hugely memorable, and the ending is a bit of a let-down, but it has quite a few nice moments and a good western atmosphere with a more interesting story and characters than most. Andre de Toth's direction is very efficient and stately.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Showdown was a Letdown
view_and_review29 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
There are generally two things that can cause two men to draw down on each other: money and women. In "Man in the Saddle" there was a woman that caused a stir between Owen Merritt (Randolph Scott) and Will Isham (Alexander Knox). Laurie Bidwell (Joan Leslie) used to be with Owen, then somewhere along the line she abruptly split up with Owen and decided to marry Will.

Will was a wealthy man who got what he wanted and didn't want to share anything he had with anyone else. The fact that Owen still had a piece of Laurie's heart bothered him immensely. Will's solution to the problem was to have Owen killed. For that he hired a Texas gunman named Fay Dutcher (Richard Rober).

"Man in the Saddle" was an OK western. I was impressed most with the color. It seems that 1951 was the year the film industry figured out how to properly colorize movies where they look more realistic. Some of the earlier attempts to colorize were bad. Sometimes a part of a person would be in color while the other part was in black & white.

There wasn't much to "Man in the Saddle." Owen was the good guy who would never shoot a man unless he had to, and he'd never shoot him in the back. Dutcher was the bad guy who had no compunctions about killing. The final showdown wasn't as good as we'd see in westerns of the 60's, and that's always a letdown.

In the final showdown Owen had Dutcher dead to rights. Owen had his gun trained on him while Dutcher had his back turned and his hands in the air. Owen ordered him to throw down his gun and start marching to the sheriff's office. Dutcher threw down the gun, but instead of beginning his walk of shame, he dove onto the ground to where his gun was, grabbed the gun, turned around and fired before Owen could get a shot off. Owen returned fire, mortally wounding Dutcher, but not until after he was struck in the arm with a bullet.

Now, it occurred to me that Owen had an opportunity to shoot Dutcher before he could fire a round, but that he was such a good guy he would only shoot after his opponent shot first (or at least after he grabbed his gun). It also occurred to me that this would be a dumb course of action. Hollywood camera tricks would have us believe that Dutcher moved with the quickness of a jumping spider and Owen barely had time to return fire before he was hit in the arm. There's no way Dutcher could dive 5-10 feet onto the ground, grab his gun, roll over and fire before Owen put three or more holes in him first. "Man in the Saddle" gets a ding for that cinematic stretch.

Free on Crackle.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saddling up Randy's gear
jgcorrea12 July 2022
The series of six westerns that Andre De Toth produced with Randolph Scott did not reach (far from that) the level of the Budd Boetticher kinda franchise. But it contained a lot of fine things starting with the aegis of the Columbia studio. Man in the Saddle is a notch above, for instance, Gordon Douglas' The Nevadan and Irving Pichel's Santa Fe, although it's no more than just pleasant, never reaching any heights. Still playing in the court of the B series League.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Surprisingly, a bit limp.
planktonrules20 August 2009
I love Randolph Scott westerns and have seen most of his films. However, unlike the vast majority of his wonderful films, this one left me feeling rather indifferent. Some of it is because the plot is oh so familiar, some of it is because the villains aren't particularly believable or interesting (Alexander Knox and Richard Rober were simply too bland for their roles) but I think a lot of it was because the motivations of the baddies were just too vague. It was like they were bad because they were caricatures--not real people. Sure, Knox's character was supposed to be jealous...but this didn't seem enough to explain his actions. And, oddly, for once, Randolph Scott also seemed aimless--at least for part of the film.

Another problem, and I've seen this in a couple other Scott films is that the stunt doubles simply didn't look like the people they were doubling for in the film. While the difference between the stunt man and Scott wasn't as bad as the one in I'M GONNA GIT YOU SUCKA!, it was pretty close. Again and again during the fight at the cabin by the waterfall, you could clearly see it wasn't him.

Despite all these problems, I am not saying that this is a bad western---it isn't a particularly inspired or interesting one. And, from Randolph Scott you just wouldn't expect ordinary. This was 100% ordinary.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Compelling western
coltras3515 March 2021
The Ranown westerns always get a better reputation, and as much I like Randolph Scott's work with Budd Boetticher, I prefer the ones he did before, like this engaging western that unravels the characters - has a tint of psychology especially concerning Alexander Knox's character - nicely before getting to the good stuff. Energetic shootouts, a lengthy fistfight with a cabin falling apart, and a shootout finale in a dust-blown street. Dialogue is snappy as is the pace. Andre de Toth is an underrated director.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Out of the rut but below average Scott western
3982 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Man In the Saddle decades ago and rewatched it recently. It is at once memorable and yet well below average. Memorable because instead of the usual revenge plot or greed-driven villainy, the two main villains are men obsessed with women who are indifferent to them and who finally explode into shocking violence which lingers after everything else about the film is forgotten. Well below average because of an underdeveloped script, flaccid direction, miscasting, and indifferent performances.

The miscasting begins with the star. Randolph Scott was 53 when this movie was made and while the leathery old dog might still be able to turn a few bonnets, he does seem a bit long in the tooth to find himself being chased by two women young enough to be his daughters. The implications of the plot may have bothered Scott. I saw Man In the Saddle back to back with Riding Shotgun and his torpid performance here is a night and day contrast with his forceful effort in the more traditional Shotgun. The two leading ladies, Ellen Drew and Joan Leslie, were third-stringers from the forties whose careers faded with their youth. Drew gets by in an undemanding part which requires little more than looking longingly in the direction of Scott now and then, but Leslie is woefully out of her depth. Laurie Bidwell Isham is an icy, calculating woman who shucks Scott, the love of her life, to enter into a business marriage with the wealthy Will Isham, well played by Alexander Knox. She coldly rebuffs the repressed Isham's fumbling intimations of affection, leaving no doubt that one clause in their marriage contract was separate bedrooms. She also tosses her father out of her wedding reception and her life as he reminds her all too forcefully that she came from the wrong side of the pasture. The echoes of the wedding bells have barely faded before she is secretly riding under the stars back to Scott. This role required an actress of the depth of a Patricia Neal. It got Leslie rehashing her chirpy ingenue performances of the war years.

Alexander Knox as Will Isham and John Russell as Hugh Clagg, the two spurned lovers, are the movie's only real assets. Isham goes sour, but he has a better side and one gets the impression an affectionate Laurie might have brought it out. When Laurie offers to go away with him at the climax, he abandons all plans for revenge or power and briskly agrees, only to be almost immediately shot down by his own hired gun. Russell is intense in the redundant role of a man hopelessly obsessed with Drew. I think he is miscast. He is twenty years younger than Scott, is strikingly handsome, and has an engaging smile. He should have switched roles with Richard Rober, pallid as a foppish gunslinger. Russell would have made a much more menacing killer. Rober's ordinary looks and bland personality might have convinced as the rejected suitor.

The movie only really comes alive when Isham or Clagg boil over into outbursts of violence. The rest is slow soap-opera complications and heavy-handed comedy relief, punctuated by a few ordinary action scenes. The final shootout between Scott and Rober is forgettable. Andre De Toth proves himself a limited director. The script meanders along various tangents, but leaves the pivotal character of Isham somewhat underdeveloped and the perhaps even more pivotal character of Laurie totally undeveloped. She marries a man she doesn't love for his money and when he is killed at least partially because of her behavior, she ends up with the money. Is that all? A better script would have fleshed out this role and possibly fished for some irony in the ending.

All in all, there might have been a good movie underneath all the dross struggling to get out, but it never made it. As is, seeing and hearing a young Ernie Ford sing is a nostalgic treat. Otherwise, at best a time filler for a rainy day.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man In The Saddle Is Classic Action Western No Longer Found
billyeye@swbell.net1 April 2003
Man In The Saddle Is Classic In Every Sense Because It Was A Fantastic Formula So Popular During The Fifties When The Star, Not The Film Pulled The Fans Into The Theater. Scott Is Excellent In The Colorful Location Of Lone Pine, California. Detoth Had Come Aboard As Director Since Usual Scott Director Edwin Marin Had Recently Died Of A Heart Attack. Man In The Saddle Is The Action Western No Longer Produced And Sorely Missed By Many, And If It Is Veiwed With An Idea Of The Time it Was Made One can Almost Feel The Excitement Which Filled Theaters No Longer Enjoyed, As In Those Days. I Rate Man In The Saddle 4 Stars Out Of 4. Billy Holcomb
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed