Portrait of Clare (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A Gentle, Traditional British Melodrama
robert-temple-114 January 2010
This is a charming and delightful tale, told in languid fashion, of the life story of the character Clare Hingston (played by Margaret Johnston), as she relates it to her own granddaughter to tell her the importance of true love. It is based on a novel by the popular novelist Francis Brett Young (1884-1954). The tale is set in Yorkshire, and most of it takes place towards the end of the 19th century. Clare falls deeply in love with 'the love of her life' Ralph Hingston and marries him. But he drowns before the birth of their son, Stephen. This leads to years of lonely young widowhood, with Clare consoling herself by playing endless Brahms, Chopin, and Schumann on her piano, while young Stephen (excellently played by child actor Jeremy Spenser) grows up to become rather disturbed and difficult to handle. Clare's parents-in-law the Hingstons are nouveaux-riches who have made a fortune from 'trade', live in a gigantic house, and have obtained or bought a title. Lady Hingston, played by the fiery Mary Clare at full volume, is a monstrous harridan and arch-snob, giving Clare no end of hell over this and that, claiming 'my grandson' and constantly trying to take him to her house, and responsible for endless trouble and stress. Worn down by it all, the dreamy Clare (played with a rather tepid gentility and delicacy by Johnston, so that one wonders why any man would get excited about her, but then this was Victorian England I suppose) finally succumbs to the entreaties of her lawyer Dudley Wilburn (played very well by Robin Bailey, with obnoxious dignity) to marry him. She does not love him at all, but she does this 'to provide a father for Stephen' and also to act as a barrier to the horrible Lady Hingston. Big mistake! He turns out to be a nightmare as a husband, fastidious, tedious, petty, tyrannical, loveless, and he not only hates young Stephen but shows it. Eventually this drives the child to run away by jumping out of a window in a severe thunderstorm and nearly getting killed. So, faced with such an extreme situation, the couple finally decide to live apart. Meanwhile, Wilburn's handsome young cousin, also a lawyer, develops genuine sympathy and love for Clare. He is excellently played by a fresh-faced Richard Todd, whose first credited film roles were only the previous year. Todd and Clare acknowledge their love for one another but because people then didn't get divorced, they wait until Wilburn dies years later, before marrying and finding perfect happiness. Clare as an old lady tells this to her impetuous granddaughter (daughter of the now grown Stephen), who has lost the love of her life in the First World War and is about to throw herself into marriage with someone she doesn't love rather than wait and hope that she will one day find another soul-mate. The film is well directed by Lance Comfort, who died in 1966 aged only 58, having directed 44 films between 1942 and 1965, few if any of which are familiar or available today, having all seemingly dropped into the Black Hole of British cinema history from which there seems to be no DVD return. The British DVD market is too small, presumably, to make the revival of all these old films economical, in stark contrast to America, where there are so many cinema buffs that they will buy anything in sufficient quantities to make almost any reissue viable. The British TV channels do not like old movies either, so none of these films are ever seen even on television (again, in strong contrast to America). I obtained this film from a private collector. I notice that no one has ever reviewed it for IMDb before. Alas for old British movies!
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Portrait of Clare - Good film - Adding footnote -
mcannady127 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Portrait of Clare is an excellent film. I enjoyed it very much and saw it for the first time recently. In fact, I was inspired to purchase the novel. The outstanding novel by Francis Brett Young paints a more complete insight into a woman's feelings as Clare passes from very young and losing Ralph, her first husband, the love of her life. When her infant son Stephen is 10, Clare marries the family solicitor, Dudley Wilburn, an older man she admires and seems to be fond of.

From the first the marriage is a disaster, as Dudley constantly criticizes Clare's spending habits, though it is her money quite often. He even criticizes her expenditures on behalf of her son Stephen.

From the start Stephen violently dislikes his stepfather and acknowledges his feelings by extreme rudeness. At first, Clare remonstrates desperately with Stephen to be reasonable and to talk about their problems.

However, her son intensifies his feelings in a verbal barrage, culminating in a thrashing by Dudley. When Stephen runs away to the wealthy former in-laws, Clare knows she can only resolve the issue by leaving Dudley. She knows that the snobbish Lady Hingston, her former mother-in-law, would soon have Stephen in her power.

Dudley is shocked that Clare is leaving him, but she insists and goes to live with Stephen in another house she owns outright. He professes his great love for Clare, but she no longer loves or admires him. She lives more peacefully and has her piano music to comfort her.

When Stephen goes to school, Clare finds her feelings gravitating to Dudley's friend and co-worker, Robert, who is a handsome and younger man. He witnesses some of the scenes with Stephen and tries to tell Dudley that he is distressing his wife and is too extreme. But Dudley will not listen and soon their arguments lead to her leaving, when Stephen is nearly 15.

The only thing I don't like about the film is that it changes Clare's future life when she seeks a divorce from Dudley. In the book Clare can attain happiness if she follows the rules from the divorce papers Dudley has drafted. Though he still loves Clare, Dudley realizes that she is in love with Robert and he wants her to be happy.

Though WWI days and the church may have frowned more readily on divorce at the time, it could be done in a tactful manner.

I don't want to create a spoiler here, but just wanted to mention that the film was more stringent than the book! After a great personal and spiritual struggle Clare becomes free to make her own choice ultimately. She and Robert do not have to wait for Dudley's passing. Although the early 20th century held a dim view about divorces in general at that time and Clare is faced with Stephen's disapproval, she makes a decision that she hopes will lead to her happiness and Robert's as well. Although Stephen disapproves and even says his mother should return to Dudley, Clare wants desperately to follow her heart. By this time Stephen enters battle in WWI and Clare meets his commanding officer.

In the book Stephen's Commanding Office, Colonel Hart, is the man Clare comes to love and respect. Col.Hart, an older man and widower, comes to love Clare, as wildly as she loves him. At first, Clare tries to resist in order to escape scandal and disapproval of her son. By this time Stephen is 18 and marries Col. Hart's daughter. Both of them oppose their parent marrying each other.

Clare returns to Dudley to ask for advice, when he sends her a letter about the scandal about her and Col. Hart meeting too often. Clare confides in Dudley her true feelings. Surprisingly, Dudley Wilburn approves the match to make Clare happy.

Though I value the film, I could more readily identify with Clare in the book and her personal struggle and ultimate dreams for happiness.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining family saga
malcolmgsw10 March 2019
This is a film of a type popular in the forties,the family saga.This film is not the best known of the genre but it is nevertheless quite good.Effective performances from the leads,particularly Robin Bailey.Now days he would have had the investigators in his office immediately. The DVD release is missing about 13 minutes from the original release.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Little comfort
FilmFlaneur21 October 2021
Portrait of Clare was the underrated British Director Lance Comfort's last A-movie and fared badly at the box office. In retrospect it is not difficult to see why: the UK critical tide at the time was running against melodrama, in which Comfort had scored his most notable successes in favour of realism, while the public taste had moved on in the interim. The film, too is not a complete success , although it copes reasonably well in reducing the original 900-page source novel to something manageable on screen. Today the cut-glass accents of many of the participants can be a distraction, while the central character neither suffers, or manipulates, enough to ignite the melodramatic tension such a story demands. Having said that it is still a good watch, and representing as it does the watershed in Comfort's career (after the poor success of this he was largely to work in lower-budget films, of which he made 20 before his death in the early 60's) it is still required viewing for those like me interested in the career trajectory of this, still largely unsung, director. For some of the best of Comfort, check out DAUGHTER OF DARKNESS, GREAT DAY, HATTER'S CASTLE and BANG! YOU'RE DEAD, as well as the later erstwhile programmer TOMORROW AT TEN with its early performance by Robert Shaw.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Clare de Loon
writers_reign15 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
When, in 1929, Noel Coward elected to have a grandmother in Bitter Sweet relate the story of her life to her granddaughter in an effort to dissuade her from marrying for the wrong reason(s) he was probably not the first person to employ the device but 21 years later it was arguably well worn but journeyman director Lance Comfort doesn't allow that to prevent him wheeling it out yet again and putting it into the mouth of Margaret Johnston as the eponymous Clare who then makes us privy to a life as colourless as the kind of weak tea that used to be described as 'maid'swater'. It's a long life that begins with marriage to the love of it - in the shape of Ronald Howard who is killed somewhat improbably - followed by a second marriage to someone - Robin Bailey - for whom the term 'aren't men beasts' may well have been coined and culminating in contentment of sorts with Richard Sequoia Todd. If killing the thick end of two hours relatively painlessly is on your bucket list then look no further.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Portrait of Margaret Johnston's Fine Acting
jromanbaker18 October 2022
I believe, given the few films that truly gave her good roles that Margaret Johnston was one of the finest actors of the 20th C, and it is saddening that she left acting so soon, partly perhaps of the inferior roles she was often given. ' Portrait of Clare ' is certainly in the best category, and every time I see it, I enjoy it and along with the delightful ' Touch and Go ' I am impatient to see her and the films again. So why was she so excellent on the screen? Hard to define, but her timing is perfect, and she never faltered in giving a good performance even in material not worthy of her. She was beautiful, and one look of her eyes said more than pages of dialogue. A perfect example of acting with her eyes is in the last scene of ' Touch and Go. ' But to return to ' Portrait of Clare ' she is onscreen most of the time. The story is a little formulaic, examining the three loves in a woman's life and I will not relate the plot as it has been dealt with by other reviewers here quite adequately. The directing is good and so are the group of actors around her, and Jeremy Spenser is exceptionally good as her only child Stephen when he was a boy. It is a quiet film, and like ' Touch and Go ' does not depend on sensationalism that then and now feeds an audience's appetite. I believe we often cast our own needs upon what we see on film, rather than respecting what is actually there. A well-deserved ten.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Do we still have the full portrait?
wilvram15 May 2020
This originally ran for ninety-eight minutes while the DVD, which is the same version that has been televised, only runs for around eighty-six. Even allowing for the slightly faster running time of PAL transmissions it suggests that some footage has been lost. As the film was initially criticized for being on the slow side, could it have been cut soon after its first showings? Grace Arnold and Robert Adair appear halfway down the cast but I did not notice either of them. There is a rather abrupt switch from Ralph's marriage to Clare, to Ralph meeting his sudden death, and I wonder if that is where cuts were made. Whatever, we are still left with a very enjoyable though slightly low-key romantic melodrama which stands repeated viewing. Margaret Johnston is very attractive and sympathetic as Clare, and first-rate character actor Robin Bailey is memorable as the dreary and priggish Dudley Wilburn. Also notable are Mary Clare as the parvenu Lady Hingston and Marjorie Fielding as Aunt Cathie. The music of Robert Schumann is gracefully utilized throughout. Adroitly directed by Lance Comfort, yet box-office failure led this to being his last 'A' picture, which seems rather unjust.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Men in Her Life
richardchatten29 February 2020
Having enjoyed great success a couple of years earlier in 'A Man About the House', Margaret Johnston starred in another adaptation of one of Francis Brett Young's massive novels, which this time crashed and burned at the box office taking Lance Comfort's career as an 'A' feature director with it.

Despite being as usual being set in a mansion the size of Hampton Court Palace, the frustrations gracefully suffered by Johnston during her long and not initially very happy life (such as the friction between her wilful young son and her stepfather, and the malevolent interference of monstrous mother-in-law Mary Clare) will doubtless still resonate today.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed