The Frightened Man (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Well-plotted thrills on a low budget
Leofwine_draca16 August 2016
THE FRIGHTENED MAN is another low budget British crime film written and directed by the ever-present John Gilling. Once again Gilling was working for the Berman and Baker team at Tempean Films and and once again he has managed to craft a well-told and engaging tale from very little resources.

The film features the ubiquitous Dermot Walsh (complete with his trademark white hair streak) as an anti-hero who's something of a scoundrel; he begins the film by quitting his studies at Oxford and returning to his father, begging charity. His father wants him to come and work at his antiques shop but Walsh is more interested in romancing the lodger and getting involved with some ne'er-do-well characters.

Eventually the main thrust of the film becomes your typical heist thriller, with plenty of tension utilised to keep the viewer occupied right until the fitting climax. Walsh does well as a truly detestable character but THE FRIGHTENED MAN is of particular note thanks to the efforts of the supporting cast. Charles Victor is excellent as the doting father who'll do anything to see his son succeed while Barbara Murray is never irritating as the woman drawn into his wiles. Michael Ward, Thora Hird, John Horsley, Ballard Berkeley, and Martin Benson all put in solid turns too. There's little to dislike about this well-plotted film.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Thriller
PaulW-727 May 2002
I saw this on the television last night. It is a good 1950's B-movie thriller. Whilst the plot is a bit hackneyed in places, it is well acted and well directed. If you like this sort of film it is well worth a viewing. If you are not a fan of this sort of film, but want to kill 69 minutes, it should do the job.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
good British noir
malcolmgsw15 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Dastardly Dermot is sent down from Oxford where he had been sent on the profits of his fathers fencing.Notwithstanding this Dermotseems to believe that he is still entitled to a reasonable standard of living.so eventually he becomes a member of Martin Bensons gang.Unfortunately he makes a very inauspicious debut.However he is able to propose a diamond robbery.Unfortunately everything goes so wrong it is a surprise that the police don't catch them till after the bungled job.Dermot decides to do a runner but falls to his death from a roof whilst his father and wife look helplessly on.this film manages to pack a lot into its 67 minutes running time.A really fine cast as well
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watchable UK crime film
gordonl563 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Charles Victor is the owner of a small furniture and antique shop who handles the odd bit of stolen goods on the side. The reason being he needs the extra cash to put his son through Oxford. The son, Dermot Walsh, gets himself tossed out and comes home to sponge off the old man. Walsh quickly runs through Victor's savings and wants more money than the old man can supply.

Walsh gets himself involved with Barbara Murray, a lodger staying at Vidor's house. She falls for the smooth talking Walsh and the pair run off together. Vidor tries to help out the couple and gets Murray a job as a receptionist at a diamond wholesaler.

Walsh in the meantime has hooked up with some heavy-duty crooks. They are going to pull a warehouse holdup and need a driver. Needless to say, the job is bungled and Walsh barely escapes capture by John Law.

Walsh now decides it would be easier to rob the office where Murray works. He hooks up with the robbery bunch again and tells them the plan. They rent the office next door and plan to break in through the wall.

Of course there is a rather large fly in the ointment. The Police have been on to the mob and have been following their every move. On the night of the break-in, the Yard swoops in just as they break through the wall into the diamond shop.

Vidor, hearing about the plan, drives to the shop to try to help his swine of a son. Walsh gets his in the end though as he falls from the roof trying to get away.

This is not a great film by any means, but at only 66 mins, it does pass the time.

Also in the cast are, John Horsley, Martin Benson, Anne Simmons and John Blythe.

Dermot Walsh had roles in, MARK OF CAIN, THE GHOST SHIP, COUNTERSPY, THE BLUE PARROT, THE STRAW MAN, BOND OF FEAR, THE HIDEOUT, MOMAN OF MYSTERY and SEA FURY.

Murray was in, THE DARK MAN, MYSTERY JUNCTION, STREET CORNER and ANOTHER MAN'S POISON.

The film was written and directed by John Gilling. Gilling's work includes, NO TRACE, VOICE OF MERRILL, DEADLY NIGHTSHADE, RECOIL, ESCAPE BY NIGHT, 3 STEPS TO THE GALLOWS, DOUBLE EXPOSURE, THE EMBEZZLER, TIGER BY THE TAIL, INTERPOL and THE MAN INSIDE.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Fine Little Crime Drama From John Gilling
boblipton16 September 2019
Dermot Walsh has just been sent down from Oxford. His father, Charles Victor, is disappointed, but puts a good face on it. Walsh can join him in his business! His son doesn't like it. The shop looks like a junk shop to him, with the very occasional valuable antique -- there's a pair of Ming vases he just got, which his assistant, Michael Ward, tells him is on the police list as stolen. There must be some mistake, says Victor.

The shop doesn't even cover all expenses. Victor has a couple of paying guests at his house. Walsh likes one very much: Barbara Murray. In fact, they disappear and he marries her, but he can't get a job, so Victor comes through with a check for fifty pounds and a secretarial job in Hatton Gardens. Actually, Walsh has been working for a local hood, and he comes up with a plan to steal a shipment of diamonds from Hatton Gardens.

It's a very twisty story from writer-director John Gilling, and the actors are up to their jobs. It's the sort of nasty crime story that pleases people: there have been lots of stories about robbing the jewelry district in London over the years, from smash-and-grab up to the one in 2015, when pensioners carted out most of one safety deposit vault over a holiday weekend -- that actually happened. I'm waiting to see a movie about that, but until I do, this dark little tale will do.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Just because this is a relatively low budget film does NOT mean it's bad in any way.
planktonrules10 January 2014
Julius Rosselli (Dermot Walsh) is coming home for what his father thinks is just a visit. After all, the young man is going to Oxford. However, he soon admits that he's been thrown out of school. While you'd think his father would be furious, Mr. Rosselli (Charles Victor) adores his son and cannot imagine that he is a bad sort. But Julius is spoiled and rather hateful--and soon falls in with criminal elements. The bottom line is that he wants wealth and fun but doesn't want to work for it. It's a shame, as he's not only hurting his father but has just convinced a nice lady to marry him and she is bound to be disappointed in her husband. All the while, Mr. Rosselli loves his son and puts up with all sorts of verbal abuse from the guy. You really want to see Julius get what he deserves and what happens next, you'll just have to see for yourself. However, expect the unexpected in this lovely little crime film.

"The Frightened Man" turned out to be a dandy movie despite the very low budget and a cast consisting mostly of lesser-known actors. The script was great--with some wonderful characters and a great plot twist near the end. Walsh, in particular, did a great job in his portrayal of Julius--the guy you love to hate. However, Victor also did a darned nice job. Overall a very good film with everything going for it but a big budget. Well worth your time.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good entertainment !
ronnybee211227 August 2020
This is not as good as a Rathbone/Bruce Sherlock Holmes movie,by any stretch of the imagination. That being said,it is still a good, entertaining film. The camera work is well-done. The plot is reasonably plausable and easy to follow. Overall,a suspenseful little gem of a movie. Well worth watching.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Good Twist at the End With Very Poignant Closing Scenes
andyrobert13 December 2019
I watched this film on Talking Pictures a few weeks ago and I can only say that it had a good story line. Although I think with more famous and charismatic actors, along with higher production values, the film could have been one of the more popular films of the 1950s.

I will again emphasise that it was a very good story line, but more could have been done with the plot.

It was unusual to see Dermot Walsh as a delusional, misguided and inexperienced robber. He usually plays the noble hero. Many people of my age will remember him in the television series "Richard the Lionheart" in the early 1960s, which was very popular with a lot of children - the episodes were often reconstructed when we went out to play afterwards.

But going back to "The Frightened Man", maybe I have missed the point of the whole film - before I submit this review, I may have watch it again on the recording that I made of it.

The enlightening qualities of the film, as well as showing that crime does not pay - not very well anyway - it depicted the more seamier and less glamourous side of London in the early 1950s. Whereas other films such as "Doctor in the House" and "Genevieve" make the era look envious and make us all yearn for the "good old days" when life seemed a lot simpler, this film gave us the opposite view.

The film depicted people working hard to make enough money just to survive on. It showed grey buildings, still dilapidated after the effects of the Second World War - and if other films showed us how nice people were in those days, this film didn't - there were a lot of bad people around in those days.

However, the film had a neat twist at the end and the closing scenes were so poignant that I nearly had tears in my eyes.

Finally, I would like to say a few words about Charles Victor, a very undervalued character actor of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. If this film had been anything more than a 'B' picture and second programmer, his performance as an old Jewish, junk dealer, with contacts everywhere, would have been worthy of an Academy Award.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good British noir
lucyrf8 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Others have told the story - the junk dealer wants his son to be a gentleman, and an architect, but the son is sent down from Oxford for reasons unspecified. Son Julius then falls in with some crooks, while his wife gets a job as secretary to a diamond merchant. Well, you can guess what happens. But there are a couple of twists at the end and a very dramatic finish.

As always, I love the authentic feel of grimy old London. The junk in the shop has flowed into the house (watched over by Thora Hird in a small role). Charles Victor, memorable in The Woman in Question, puts on a convincing Italian accent as the deluded dad.

It is very well shot, with high contrast and dark shadows, especially in the last scenes. Unfortunately the sound is not very good. I kept missing lines of dialogue, so turned on the subtitles. Unfortunately the subtitler had not been able to hear all the dialogue either, resorting to (MUMBLES) and confusing the names of Rosselli and Marcella. Some lines came out as a complete word salad.

Michael Ward is good as Cornelius the educated sales assistant in the antique shop. Mr Big the gangster taunts him for smelling of roses, Julius calls him "that Victorian gramophone", and Mr Rosselli reminds everybody that Cornelius is fond of his mother. Perhaps his maltreatment is intended to show us these characters' true natures, however charming or paternal they appear to be.

But wouldn't the police arrest Mrs Rosselli too, instead of just leaving her in the street? Will she find happiness with the policeman? Will she take over the antiques business?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The prodigal son
clanciai1 March 2023
He comes home to his father in London with an Antiques shop after having been sent down from Oxford. The father is devastated but that is only the beginning of his tragedy, which gradually unfolds more and more to reach the dimensions of a Greek tragedy in its fathomless abyss of misfortune. His father has done everything for him, worked hard all his life for his son to have a fine education, but the son just rebels and associates with doubtful characters in the pursuit of fast money, and it goes from bad to worse. His marriage might save him; like his father his young wife can but idealise and think the best of him, while he commits the mistake of trying to fool them all. You can't do that perpetually. Still, when all is lost his father tries to save him one last time, but then even his wife has been forced to open her eyes and discover the truth.

There are many issues here, many questions and much to wonder about, and the father ultimately blames himself for having been a bad father - they always do, when the sons go wrong, although they were the best of fathers. When the tragedy is a fact there is nothing you can do about it but try some philosophy, but in the end not even his philosophy will comfort the father. Charles Victor makes a fine performance as the severely tried father, who never tires of giving up hopes for his lost son, no matter how hopeless he is.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed