Eaux d'artifice (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Spellbinding chiaroscuro
cyberinsekt13 September 2001
Somewhat atypical of Anger's films, this seems to be a pure visual treat with none of his trademark homoeroticism or occult references. To a soundtrack of "The Four Seasons", a woman wearing eighteenth century clothes wanders through a garden carrying a fan, until she comes across a fountain. She enters the waters, and fades to nothingness. Anger's camerawork is nothing less than sensational, catching the play of light on the water superbly. This short film was shot in b&w, and printed with a coloured tint, with the fan hand-tinted in a separate colour. Simple, and beautifully effective.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sorry, But Not Kenneth Anger's Best
gavin694222 January 2016
A woman dressed elegantly walks purposely through the water gardens at the Villa d'Este in Tivoli, as the music of Vivaldi's "Winter" movement of "The Four Seasons" plays. Heavy red filters give a blue cast to the light; water plays across stone, and fountains send it into the air. No words are spoken. Baroque statuary and the sensuous flow of water are back lit. Anger calls it "water games." Based on what I've read, many have considered this among Anger's best, or his masterpiece, and it is apparently very influential. For me, I just did not care for it. I get that he shot it very beautifully and the use of tinting and light make this something of a moving painting. But, you know, it does not have that imagery I expect from his work.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Review - Eaux d'artifice
Maxence_G30 October 2020
Unlike other Kenneth Anger short films, the focus is not on the characters nor on their sexual orientation. But rather on water, it brings originality but doesn't compel as much as the rest of his work
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Water sculpture firework fantasy displays
Polaris_DiB5 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
So far as I've seen, Kenneth Anger has kept mainly to stage-like productions of silent films with a lot of art concepts that appeal to me. This one is so far the one I like the most. Anger shoots in blue-tinted black and white again, this time in a water-sculpture park in Italy.

Eaux D'Artifice, Anger explains, is a pun on "Feux D'Artifice" which means "firework." Most of the shots in this film deal predominantly with light as it refracts through the water, in many cases making images that are very resemblant to fireworks. Eaux D'Artifice could also in a way mean "Water Sculpture", which is often what Anger builds this film around.

Anger's choice of a protagonist was a very good one. Her size does indeed make the park look bigger and more fantastic, and I think this is Anger's most effective creation of imaginary and dreamlike realms. This movie is very reminiscent of fantasy book covers and paintings that seem to somehow attract many people by a sense of serene mysticism and magical perplexity. Somehow this film reaches to an internal need for magic and alternate worlds, which I feel is very related to our obsession with dreams.

--PolarisDiB
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Captivating film (possible spoilers)
greenegg1 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Many years ago, I took a college film/literature/art class co-taught by a marvelous English professor/filmmaker and an art professor who was also a gifted modern artist. The entire experience proved enlightening and just plain delightful, despite a handful of redneck ignoramuses. One of the most captivating, intriguing films we viewed during that class was Eaux d'artifice. I adore water gardens, such as the ones I had already toured at Longwood and Chatsworth. Long a student of history, I felt fascinated watching this rather small woman in 18th century garb waft about the sumptuous foliage and water arrangements amid the splendor of Tivoli and the d'Este estate. Vivaldi's Winter provided the perfect soundtrack. Thirty years on, I recollect this incredible film with the greatest pleasure. The photography remains breathtaking, even filtered through my memory banks. We also viewed Anger's Magick Lantern Cycle, which simply confirmed my estimation of Anger's genius. His use of imagination in exploring history and eroticism through the framework of the arts also stimulated my own imagination. This film, as well as Anger's other work, certainly bear exploration. Sit back and let the beauty of Tivoli and the mystery of its diminutive guest waft over you.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Meditation on the beauty of moving water.
EyeAskance1 April 2004
A stunning water garden is the empyrean setting for this short film, one of the director's strongest works. The ceaseless motion of liquid in an elaborate fountain-system is given close study in high-contrast black and white...jets, streams and droplets dance madly to classical music as the water becomes seemingly enlivened with a zoetic personality. The mood shifts with the music's dramatic rise-and-fall, being somber and wintry one moment, majestic and powerful the next. Intermittently, a shadowy figure in period costume moves hurriedly through the scenery, adding even further mystique to the proceedings.

Mesmerizing in its organic beauty...a small masterwork. 9/10
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The least of Anger's works
preppy-31 September 2008
Pointless (and deadly dull) short film by Kenneth Anger. It involves a small woman (called the Water Witch I believe) wandering around this place with tons of gushing water. Then at the end she becomes a fountain. Swear to God--that's it! Anger's early films are an acquired taste. I did like "Fireworks", "Puce Moment" and "Rabbits Moon" but the popularity of this has always escaped me. I've seen it multiple times and (more often than not) found myself struggling to stay awake! Anger's beautiful imagery seems to be missing here. Just a bunch of gushing water and a midget running around in a bizarre outfit is not enough to keep me interested. How this got on the list of film to be preserved is beyond me. "Fireworks" is MUCH better than this--but I guess "Fireworks" is too homo erotic. I personally can't stand this one but many others seem to think it's a masterpiece. Use your own judgment.
2 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A masterpiece
planktonrules27 October 2009
The short films of Kenneth Anger are certainly NOT for the casual film goer! The best way to describe them is avant-garde--and often make little sense, as they are not meant to be shown to the masses. Some are incredibly artistic--like filmed work of art. Some are really cheaply made and definitely look it. Regardless, they are a challenge to watch and I very strongly recommend you see them with his commentary activated. So why would I see these shorts? Well, in a recent interview I noticed that John Waters credits Anger for much of his inspiration. And, since I have seen all the films of Waters that are available (a couple very early ones aren't), it seems natural I'd give Anger's films a try. This and four other reviews are best on the DVD "Films of Kenneth Anger: Volume 1".

I notice that one reviewer gave this film a 1 and called it the worst of Anger's films. While I can really understand someone not liking his work (it is a very acquired taste), I can't see attacking this film in particular, as it is one of the loveliest and most technically amazing shorts of the age. While I do NOT generally like art films, this one is amazing.

Much of the reason I was so impressed with this film was as Anger described it in the commentary track, I realized just how difficult the film was to get it to look the way it did. To give the film a wonderful blue luminous quality, he actually filmed the short using black & white film shot through a red filter. Then, he had the result developed using color stock! To make the scenery at Tivoli's water garden look bigger, he used a midget as his actress! And, to get the water to cascade just right, he also used varying speeds with the camera. I was quite impressed that a film maker who was not at all "Hollywood" but an avant-garde film maker would know to do this. Additionally, the use of Vivaldi's "Winter" from "The Four Seasons" was perfectly timed to the film and made the whole thing a treat to see.

If you are looking for an art film, it doesn't get a lot better than this.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A good watch - for 2 minutes
Horst_In_Translation10 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately this Kenneth Anger film runs 10 minutes more than that. Actually, the flow of the water is nice to watch, the colors are pretty great and the classical music is good to listen to, but it's simply not enough material for such a runtime. I would like to say that this not turning out so well may have been because of Anger's inexperienced being only in his mid20s when he made this, but this was already his 10th movie and he had been active for over 10 years at that point already as a filmmaker, so I cannot be more generous with the rating here. Overall, I have to say this was a disappointment. Most of his films are pretty much style over substance to this date. He is almost 90 right now and still making movies. Oh yeah, don't be fooled by the French title, there is no spoken language in here, so you can watch this if you don't speak the language. But why would you want to? "Eaux d'artifice", I cannot recommend.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Staggering Visual Masterpiece
rham-975-64491723 August 2021
I saw this on a fairly large screen as part of a MOCA exhibit in Los Angeles. I probably watched it four or five times that day. It is one of the most stunning films I have ever seen. It's breathtaking.

Sadly, every time I've seen it since, it doesn't sync quite right with the video format. You have to see it as a film projection (or find a source that gets around the mis-sync). Well worth it if you can!!!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
plot less, but nonetheless brilliant
framptonhollis26 August 2017
Beautiful! Kenneth Anger's obscure filmography is chock full of artistic masterpieces, and "Eaux d'artifice" is among his very best work! Unlike many other Anger films, "Eaux d'artifice" is not provocative, explicit, or disturbing, instead it is a gorgeous, magical short focusing on the majesty of water. The fountains featured in the film flow with grace, water moves majestically through nearly every shot, images dissolve in and out of one another in a uniquely constructed, breathtaking way. This film will likely have fans of experimental art and imagery speechless, gleefully bathing in Anger's adventurous imagination. An avant garde classic this one is, and for good reason!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Probably Too Long
Hitchcoc2 May 2019
We are treated to close up after close up of the Tivoli fountains. A woman in a long dress and feathers walks or runs through the scenery. The images are beautiful and Vivaldi's Four Seasons "Winter" is always worth the wait. The problem is that the images are presented over and over again and at some point the mind begins to wander. It's an apt effort but just never seems to end. Could have occasionally used a different point of view to break things up.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed