How to Marry a Millionaire (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
133 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Monroe and Grable and Bacall
didi-53 April 2005
This entertaining film has the three girls (Pola, played by Marilyn Monroe in specs; Schatze, played by Lauren Bacall and looking rather mumsy; and Loco, played by Betty Grable with those fabulous legs) setting up shop in an apartment, ready to reel in wealthy husbands.

The boys in question include David Wayne, Rory Calhoun, Cameron Mitchell, William Powell, and Alex D'Arcy. Trying to figure out the scheming girls is hard for them, especially when the girls are going all out to hide their real personalities!

This glitzy fluff is enlivened by real-life in-jokes - Betty Grable doesn't recognise a Harry James record (she was married to him at the time), and Lauren Bacall says she's mad about 'that old man in The African Queen'(real-life husband Bogart of course). Bacall comes out best of the girls although Monroe is always worth watching and Grable was effective decoration even towards the end of her career, as she was here (having been on screen for over twenty years at this point - her first appearance was in her teens in 'Hold 'Em Jail', I think).
26 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Super Fun Fluff
daoldiges31 March 2019
Bacall, Grable, and Monroe, along with fabulous fashions and sets, and a few epic shots of NYC all contribute to making an otherwise very thin film just plain fun to watch. I'm not going to spend time analyzing the different personalities each of the three leads and their men are supposed to represent. The title pretty much tells the story and I will just say that this was a fun, easy, and pleasant way to spend a couple of hours.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Caustic and sweet go hand in hand.
hitchcockthelegend17 September 2008
Loco Dempsey, Pola Debevoise and Schatze Page, each one a pretty model, their goal in life?, to marry millionaires. They set themselves up in a top apartment and set about wooing any potential suitors, trouble is is that it's hard to tell the rich from the normal, and love may just have a say after all.

Betty Grable, Marilyn Monroe and Lauren Bacall play our three dubiously motivated ladies, each one putting a delightful stamp on each respective character. Filmed in CinemaScope, New York {and the girls Manhattan apartment}is beautifully realised and with the restored DVDs available, the colour positively gleams on the screen. The story itself is a fun one, tho at its core it's of course greedy and selfish, but this is a romantic comedy that plays out with delightful ease, and thankfully doesn't contain pointless filler scenes to purely showcase the actresses on show.

Monroe has never looked as pretty as she does here, some of her other films are obviously more famous, but she radiates sexiness and with her character being vision impaired, she gets to show the wonderful comedic talent that she definitely had. Bacall clearly is the best actor on show, so it's no surprise that she gets the best written part, at times bitter, intelligent and determined, her Schatze Page character is the glue binding the picture {and the girls} together. Betty Grable is solid without really impacting a great deal, with the boys {notably Rory Calhoun} offering entertaining support. How To Marry A Millionaire is simply a delightful movie that never over tries your patience, it's a fun ride with a little something for everyone, and it cheerily pays you off at the end. 7/10
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a piece of fun ....
hamlet-1617 April 2004
The film, the first filmed in CinemaScope, although the second to be released, remains as slick and witty as ever. While the three girls chase rich husbands they somehow end up marrying for love.

Personally for me it is Lauren Bacall and William Powell that standout...their witty knowing conversations are a true delight. Mr Powell shows just why he was so highly regarded. He has a magnificent calm and dignified presence beautifully complimented by Mrs Bogart's cool chic.

The film shows all the problems of early CinemaScope of course ...the lack of closeups because of optical distortions that would occur and enough light to sunbake under being necessary on the sets and a sound scheme with the stereophonic image shifting from side to side as characters moves across the screen.

The film is beautifully restored on the DVD with fine colour and sound.

The use of a 1:2.55 ratio means a truly WIDE screen ....which is shown off by the location shots of New York and the girls apartment which seems enormous!

The opening sequence/overture of course was designed to show off both the brand new wide screen and stereo sound. It seems slightly redundant now but is still a fabulous piece of music by Alfred Newman.

So turn the lights down, turn up the stereo and step back to 1953 and watch a consumate piece of entertainment
59 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Looking at the DVD case, you'd assume that Marilyn Monroe was THE lead in this film.
planktonrules14 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I hate the merchandising people at the major studios. Often, to boost sales they misrepresent movies to attract audiences. One of the worst examples is 20th Century-Fox's marketing of videotapes and DVDs of films in which Marilyn Monroe appeared. While HOW TO MARRY A MILLIONAIRE isn't the worst case, by looking at the box art you'd assume that she was the lead in this film. In reality, there were three leads--Monroe, Betty Grable and Lauren Bacall. It was truly an ensemble film. Now as I said, this was not the worst example. In many of her earliest films Monroe was only a bit player--yet she is prominently featured on the cover art! Take a look at the art on the IMDb pages for THE ASPHALT JUNGLE, LOVE HAPPY or MONKEY BUSINESS--you'll see what I mean even though she was a supporting or bit actress in these films.

In HOW TO MARRY A MILLIONAIRE, it's actually good that you have the ensemble cast. After all, how can you make it a story about three money-hungry roommates if Monroe plays all three parts!! Plus, at the time the film was made, Betty Grable received top billing as she was the more established and prestigious star at the time. A few short years later, Miss Grable's career would be over and Monroe would shoot to super-stardom.

The story is a remake, though I haven't seen any of the previous versions. Three ladies decide to live together in a swank Manhattan apartment as they try to hook themselves wealthy husbands.

Grable's love interest is Fred Clark--a rich man with the disposition of a sour pickle. He is already married and really isn't interested in marriage--just making Grable his mistress. Her character is the ditsy one--naive and dumb and she fails to grasp how nasty Clark is.

Bacall is the most-pursued in the film--with an apparently poor guy (Cameron Mitchell) Grable met in a deli pursuing her as well as nice-guy William Powell. She is the supposedly smart one of the three but has a hard time reading men--even though the scheme is hers.

As for Monroe, she is sort of like a middle ground between her other two roommates. She's not as ditsy nor as bright as the other two. Despite her amazing looks, she isn't quite as ardently pursued as you'd expect in the film! Heck, I'd expect ALL the men in the film to chase after her! And, as for finding a millionaire, this shouldn't be a problem! One of her love interests in the film is the unlikely David Wayne and their scenes together are marvelous.

Despite all the girls' plans, things don't turn out in the end like any of them envisioned. They all get men who they really had no intention in getting...yet like a Hollywood film, everything works out wonderfully at the end. Along the way, the film is chock full of nice little vignettes and performances all due to good acting and a very agreeable script. I particularly liked the nice role played by William Powell--his graceful presence did a lot to add class to the film, though there were several other nice performances as well. Plus, everything just looked and sounded so nice--with the film being shot in CinemaScope and with lovely music throughout. It was obvious that 20th Century-Fox pulled out all the stops for this production. I'd give this one an 8 and it's well worth seeing.

By the way, read through the IMDb trivia for the film and you'll find one of the dumbest forced changes to a film of the era. The powers that be at the censor board would not allow Miss Monroe to say the old saying "men don't make passes at girls who wear glasses"--as it was apparently too racy or something else that is beyond me!! Huh?!?!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Wealthy men are never old."
utgard144 February 2014
The opening prologue is an orchestra performance that has nothing to do with the rest of the movie. I began to wonder if I was watching the wrong movie. I've read they did this because it was the first movie shot in Cinemascope and they wanted to highlight the new stereophonic sound system. Seems to me it was unnecessary but times were different then I guess. Anyway, the plot is about three women on the hunt for husbands. Naturally, they would prefer rich husbands. Lauren Bacall plays the leader of the three -- she's the smart, sophisticated one. Betty Grable plays the ditzy, naïve one. A role Marilyn Monroe probably would have played just a few years later due to typecasting. Here Marilyn plays a sort of middleground between Bacall and Grable's characters. Not too bright and not too dumb. She wears glasses but frequently takes them off because she thinks men don't like girls who wear glasses. There are several amusing gags that come as a result of her poor eyesight. All three ladies are beautiful, of course. They are also very funny and immensely appealing. The men in the film are pretty good, too. Even the ones playing jerks, like the great Fred Clark. Cameron Mitchell, David Wayne, and Rory Calhoun play the three primary love interests and are all likable. William Powell, in his second-to-last film, is as classy as they come. The themes are a little dated but it's all light and fluffy so nothing to get indignant about, for those of you who might. It's a fun, enjoyable romantic comedy. Fans of the three leads will love it most.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gold Diggers of 1953
jotix10015 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This was the first movie filmed in Cinemascope, or at least, one of the first ones to use the new technique. Jean Negulesco, the director, gives it a great reading of the play in which the film is based. Nunnally Johnson, is given credit as an adapter, but also acted as the producer.

The film was innocent fun by 1953 standards. We are presented with three girls that would be room mates in a gorgeous New York apartment. The only problem is none of them have any money. What to do? Try to attract a man with enough money to keep them in a style they were not accustomed to live!

The trio of young women are beautiful. We have the brainy Schatze in charge of the household. Then there are the myopic Pola, and the flighty Loco. It's clear that the only one with a head on her shoulders si Schatze, who knows how to move in the cafe society of the New York of those years. Unfortunately, the women's choice in men is awful. Two of them end up with guys that are just making a living, and in a surprise at the last moment, the last girl gets a real millionaire when she only thought he was a working class stiff!

The film, although light, it's still fun to watch. Lauren Bacall is the one that fares better in the film, not only does she get the prize package, but she gives an intelligent account of her elegant and sophisticated Schatze. Betty Grable doesn't have much to do, and a bespectacled Marilyn Monroe, does a lot with her character.

William Powell makes a great appearance as the older man in Schatze's life. He still was showing his charm as the Texas man with enough sense to resign being married to a much younger woman. David Wayne, Cameron Mitchell, Rory Calhoun, Fred Clark, are the men in the lives of the would be gold diggers.

This is a film to be seen as a curiosity film made in the new technology of Cinemascope.
21 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
How to have a wonderful Saturday night at home, get this film!
inkblot114 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Schatze (Lauren Bacall) was briefly married to a gas station employee. But, fresh from her divorce, she is determined to do things differently the next time. No more nickle and dime husbands for her, she is going to marry a millionaire. Concocting an unusual scheme, she sublets a Manhattan apartment that belonged to a businessman who had to flee the country. As it is doubtful he will ever return, she begins selling the expensive piano and furnishings to afford the rent. Then, she convinces two other women to join her in a plot to find money-dripping mates. Pola (Marilyn Monroe) is a near-sighted beauty who rarely wears her spectacles because men don't make passes on women with glasses, as the saying goes. Very often, she doesn't have a clue about what her date looks like. Loco (Betty Grable), herself a blonde beauty, wants to marry well but is easily distracted by a handsome face, even if the gentleman is as poor as a churchmouse. In short order, Schatze is romanced by a great-looking, tie-less, seemingly poverty-stricken wisecracker, Tom (Cameron Mitchell) and Loco, intending to spend a weekend with a rich old coot, meets an attractive forest ranger in the woods of Maine. Meanwhile, Pola is supposed to hook up with someone in Atlantic City but boards a plane to Kansas City by mistake, where she meets a handsome, four-eyed, two-bit businessman. Will the gold digging schemes of these three ladies go out the window? Here is a film my three sisters and I adored when we were teenagers in the late fifties-early sixties. Made in 1953, it is a wonderful romantic comedy and looks sensational to boot. Bacall, Grable, and especially Monroe are total delights as the women who would be glad to make matches with millionaires, if only true love was not around to rear its head. The rest of the cast, including Mitchell, is quite nice, too. Naturally, the costumes are gorgeous and the settings among the uppercrust are first class as well. As for the script and direction, they are both snappy, memorable and fun. If you have a hankering for romantic comedy, do see one of the groundbreaking romcoms of all time by renting this film (or buying it for 50 cents, which is what I did!). Any viewer who does so will turn a dull evening at home into an experience worth a million bucks.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
'Keep the change, Mac.'
Nazi_Fighter_David17 June 2007
Three models (Marilyn Monroe, Betty Grable and Lauren Bacall) pool their resources to rent an expensive penthouse apartment in New York, each girl hoping to catch a wealthy husband...

Cameron Mitchell helps Betty Grable with groceries one morning and meets and falls in love with Bacall… But she rejects him, thinking he is a 'gas pump jockey.'

The girls are nearly broke when Grable introduces them to an oil tycoon, a widower (William Powell) who becomes interested in Bacall… Grable takes a trip with wealthy and married Fred Clark, under the impression that they are going to a convention in Maine… Once at his lodge, she realizes they will be alone and is set to return to New York when she suddenly felt sick… A forest ranger named Rory Calhoun comes into her life, and they fall in love…

Marilyn leaves by plane to meet her one-eyed playboy Alex D'Arcy in Atlantic City, but because she refuses to wear glasses in public to correct her nearsightedness, she gets on the wrong plane… On board she meets David Wayne, the owner of their penthouse apartment, who is on his way to Kansas City to find his tax accountant because of whom he is in trouble with the revenue department…

Bacall, left alone and without money, agrees to marry the oilman Powell…

"How to be a Millionaire" was the second CinemaScope film ever made, the first being "The Robe." The film marked David Wayne's last movie appearance with Marilyn… He made four pictures with her, more than any other actor
20 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My life in Hollywood
romaus7617 May 2006
Back in the early 50's, I was road manager for the Harry James band. As you know, Harry was married to Betty Grable. I also did special work for Betty outside of 20th Century Foxes eyes & ears. In February 1953, Buddy Rich, the great drummer joined the band and one evening, we had a small party for Buddy at the Hollywood Paladium where the band was working. Betty Grable & Marie Rich got to be friends and Betty invited Buddy & Marie to the studio where she was working on the movie, How to Marry a Millionaire. Harry & I picked up Buddy & Marie at the Beverly Hills Hotel and went to the studio. At the studio, we were all in Bacall's dressing room having coffee & danish and waiting for the queen, Miss Monroe to arrive. She had a habit of being late quiet a bit and keeping a lot of people waiting for her. Bacall, who is known for her salty language, gave her quite a verbal tongue lashing, but it just rolled off her back. When Betty passed away with cancer, I flew from my home in Fort Lauderdale, Fl. to Vegas for the funeral, then again for Harry's funeral.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't ever get on Warner Brothers' case for doing a story to death in remakes...
AlsExGal15 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
... because Fox did the same with the "multiple girls looking for love/millionaires in a foreign country" bit. There was "Ladies In Love" (1936) set in Budapest, a long pause caused by WWII and the lack of safe countries in which to find a millionaire, then this film set in New York because the world was still a bit of a jumble, then "Three Coins in The Fountain (1954) set in Rome.

In case you haven't seen the others, three girls pool their resources to rent a penthouse apartment in - this case - Manhattan with the hope of marrying millionaires.

The only storyline I really care is for Marilyn Monroe and David Wayne. They make her ridiculous, Mr. Magoo-level blind, to the point where you wonder how she didn't wander into traffic or fall down a manhole five years ago, but there is a scene on the plane that is priceless involving this joke. William Powell brings quiet dignity to a non-comic role in a comedy. I would have rather seen Lauren Bacall end up with him, frankly. The bit that goes on the ENTIRE movie where we know Cameron Mitchell is loaded, and Bacall doesn't find out until the last 15 seconds, ugh. I mean, I know it's to prove that she's capable of falling in love regardless of the guy's financial status, but it's a thin joke to carry on that long. And Betty Grable's character, frankly, it's just hard to believe anyone could be THAT stupid, mistaking what Fred Clark means when he says he wants to take her to his lodge in Maine and mistaking what Rory Calhoun means when he says all that land "is mine". And I know they wanted to wow everyone with the Cinemascope shot that shows the whole orchestra at once, but opening a screwball comedy with a six-minute static shot of an orchestra playing a downbeat piece totally kills the momentum before the story even starts. In the theater, I guess this is when people were still getting popcorn. At home, it's unwatchable.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Trapping a Bankroll
bkoganbing24 October 2007
How to Marry a Millionaire is one of the brightest and wittiest comedies of the fifties and certainly quite an eyeful when you've got three leads of the caliber of Lauren Bacall, Marilyn Monroe, and Betty Grable.

These three lovely girls, following the cue from Lauren Bacall, chip in and get a long term lease on a swank apartment where the owner has had to leave the country because of income tax problems. The post World War II years saw a lot of that happening. The idea is to set up a mantrap, put up a good front in the hopes of attracting men with wealth. And all three come up with men of all varieties.

Betty unfortunately takes up with the already married, but not working at it too hard Fred Clark. His plans for a romantic getaway with her are spoiled by her coming down with an adult case of the measles and Grable catching sight of Forest Ranger Rory Calhoun. You will love the way the scheming Fred Clark gets nailed.

Marilyn meets up with David Wayne, the guy whose apartment the women have taken over. In Marilyn fashion she gets on the wrong plane with Wayne, thinking it was Atlantic City instead of Kansas City.

And Bacall the most determined of all to marry a millionaire. She has her choice between elderly sophisticated William Powell and earnest young Cameron Mitchell.

The irony of this film is that all three women set out to trap a bankroll, yet all three fall for people themselves. No telling what fate has in store for you.

How to Marry a Millionaire is the next to last film of William Powell and his first after leaving his long term contract at MGM. He's the picture of elegance and sophistication. Listening to every line from his mouth is a joy.

Nunnally Johnson's screenplay and Jean Negulesco's direction make How to Marry a Millionaire one of the best films of the Fifties. Catch those lines referring to the celebrity husbands of Bacall and Grable.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
All three stars are showcased in this CinemaScope extravaganza...
Doylenf23 January 2007
Fox released this one right after THE ROBE did smash box-office when it opened at New York's Roxy theater. Likewise, HOW TO MARRY A MILLIONAIRE featured an opening orchestral number under Alfred Newman's baton before the credits began--and then the wide screen became the source for watching BETTY GRABLE, LAUREN BACALL and MARILYN MONROE put their own personal stamp of sex appeal on the CinemaScope screen.

This one is probably best enjoyed in the widescreen version rather than the pan and scan shown on some TV stations. It's a witty delight from start to finish, with Monroe doing a delightful impersonation of a near-sighted blonde ashamed to wear glasses and always walking into walls; Grable as a snappy charmer who gets hooked into a trip to Maine thinking she's going to a convention; and Bacall as the know-it-all sophisticate with the sharp tongue who's good at bossing others around.

While Bacall is great in the role, it's really an alienating part and she can't always disguise the fact that her character--in real life--would be considered an annoying bitch. True, she has some of the best lines, but the sarcasm stings a little too much at times and her treatment of doormen and furniture movers is very condescending.

So, it's up to Grable and Monroe to keep things light and breezy, and that they do. Also on hand for some sophisticated charm is WILLIAM POWELL in one of his last screen roles, RORY CALHOUN as a forest ranger who attracts Betty's eye, and CAMERON MITCHELL as a man who turns out to be someone Bacall should have treated with more respect.

It's fun all the way, easy to take and easy on the eyes whenever the three stars cavort around the screen in assorted fashion ensembles.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Gold-Diggers Dilemma...
Xstal20 August 2023
Three ladies seek to plunder a small fortune, by marrying a man who they can then prune, but he must be, very wealthy, one would assume not too healthy, these girls are hoping things get opportune. So they lease or fleece a place where they can stay, a place to entertain, have fun and play, taking advantage of what's offered, all the things that they are proffered, one by they find that love don't come their way. It's not the deepest film that you have ever seen, rather shallow to be fair, and rather lean, not that funny, rich or charming, of the sexes it's quite harming, imagine watching this upon the silver screen (and finding it entertaining!).
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
baked Alaska
Fiona-3929 March 2001
An over excited critic once wrote that seeing Monroe in Cinemascope was like being smothered in baked Alaska, and seeing this movie, you know exactly what he (I assume he was a he) was on about. The movie opens on the extreme verticals of New York skyscrapers and narrow city streets, then cuts to a wonderfully elongated horizontal Monroe streeeeeeeetched across the scene in an increasingly empty apartment (the girls sell their furniture to be able to pay the rent). This movie is dated and fluffy, but has several interesting elements that make it worth a look for anyone interested in movie history, any of the leads, or in passing a wet Sunday afternoon in a pleasant way. This was Grable's last performance. She knew Monroe was about to usurp her, but the two women both dealt with an uncomfortable situation in a professional way. There is a great narrative twist in the film too - Monroe plays a short sighted girl who finally meets the man to marry her when he tells her he likes her in her glasses. Unlike the usual cliched plot line, it is when Monroe keeps her glasses on that she is revealed to be beautiful. Her acting is this film is among her best, especially her vulnerable scene in the gold aeroplane, and the moment in the powder room when she looks at herself in the mirrors and explodes into five, raspberry satin dress covered Marilyn's is a visual pleasure the film and the viewer revel in (Monroe can't, not wearing her glasses at that point). This film is creamy, smooth, warm - just liked baked Alaska!!
30 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Glorious fluff
VADigger16 January 2022
It's loaded with charm, color, glamour, and quite a bit of wit - and not much else. The plot is, of course, ludicrous, but it doesn't really matter. This is one of those movies that has no pretense of being anything but the lightest of entertainment. And what a treat to watch three of Hollywood's most glamorous gals having fun! So just give in and enjoy.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Can't Buy These Girls Love
evanston_dad11 March 2012
Lauren Bacall, Betty Grable and Marilyn Monroe play three blonde bombshells who set out to set themselves up with millionaires, only to find, predictably, that true love isn't something that can be bought.

The film goes down easy, mostly because of the talents of its three leading ladies. But its primary reason -- or two reasons -- for existence are as a showcase for a non-stop parade of fashionable gowns (designed by Charles LeMaire and Travilla) and the at the time new cinematic technique of Cinemascope, which uses such a wide aspect ration that every single interior -- a living room, a diner, a country cottage -- looks as big as an airline hangar. I don't think a single actor in the film is shot at anything closer than a medium closeup so that director Jean Negulesco can have expanses of frame left on either side which he chooses to fill with vast arrays of tacky 1950s decor.

The film does prove that Marilyn Monroe looks adorable in glasses.

Grade: B
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Marilyn is pretty good, as are the jokes about Bogie and Bacall
zetes12 August 2002
In this film, three women, played by three huge stars, Lauren Bacall, Marilyn Monroe, and Betty Grable, move in together with the plan to each land a millionaire. They each get involved with millionaires, but men of more humble means (and at least one man pretending to be) end up winning them over in the end. It's kind of lackluster, but it's moderately entertaining. It probably should have been funnier. The only real humor comes from Monroe, who needs glasses but is afraid no man will find her attractive when she's wearing them. She stumbles around bumping into walls and mistaking people's identities. There are also a lot of great in-jokes about Bacall's marriage to Humphrey Bogart. In the film, the millionaire whom she dates is played by the great actor William Powell, who was in his early sixties when the film was made. When he tells Bacall that he's too old for her, she tells him how she adores older men. "You know that old fella from The African Queen. I love that guy!" Betty Grable is pretty forgettable, but, then again, I never found her particularly talented or attractive. She's pretty average on both fronts, as far as I'm concerned. The film is also interesting as an early example of the use of widescreen (supposedly it was the first film in that format). It was developed in 1953 so that cinemas would have an extra draw, as television was destroying the industry. I watched a cropped version, unfortunately, but I think I did a decent job reconstructing how shots were originally composed. The opening and closing scenes are the most interesting. For no other reason than to demonstrate the new format, the screen encompasses an entire orchestra. The word "Cinemascope" appears enormously both at the beginning and at end. 7/10.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Some caveats to help people figure out whether they want to watch what many consider a great classic movie
jklavens30 July 2001
This is a confection of a movie, although those who dislike the era or dislike classic movies generally won't take to it.

Admittedly, the basic premise -- 3 good-looking women set themselves up to land at least one rich spouse -- is pretty nauseating. But the performances are chiseled to perfection (and so over the top), and the era captured so evocatively that the movie is a joy to watch.

If you can suspend your social conscience and your dislike of the restrictive roles that paralyzed everyone (especially women) during that era, then settle onto the couch with a bowl of popcorn and enjoy the sets, the clothes, the music, the oddly drawn characters and the sedated/flattened 1950s version of screwball humor.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How to Marry a Millionaire
jboothmillard14 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The title sounded appealing, the three female leads are called three of the legends, and I knew I had to see this film if it had Marilyn in it. Basically three New York models, Schatze Page (Lauren Bacall), Pola Debevoise (Marilyn Monroe) and Loco Dempsey (Betty Grable) have set up an exclusive apartment with a plan. Besides giving away their many pieces of furniture and ornaments for cash, they are tired of cheap men and intend to use their skills to trap and marry three millionaires. But as they find what they think are their perfect targets, they are both struggling to tell the rich from the hucksters, and they wonder is the money really worth it (no real feelings towards the men). One by one, they eventually start falling for their true love interests, who all look like Normal Joes, and all eventually will become their husbands. In the end, Pola has married a nice guy from a plane who has the same eye sight trouble she does, Loco has married someone that really cares about her, and Schatze eventually walks out of her intended millionaire marriage to be with the almost stalking nice guy, but in the end, a bit anticipated but still great, all three "Normal Joes" share a secret of being millionaires. Also starring David Wayne as Freddie Denmark, Rory Calhoun as Eben, Cameron Mitchell as Tom Brookman, Alexander D'Arcy as J. Stewart Merrill, Fred Clark as Waldo Brewster and William Powell as J.D. Hanley. The best jokes for me are Monroe taking off her glasses and bumping into people, and obviously her regular naivety routine. It was nominated the Oscar for Best Costume Design, and it was nominated the BAFTA for Best Film from any Source. Marilyn Monroe number 39 on The 100 Greatest Movie Stars, Lauren Bacall was number 20, and Monroe number 6 on 100 Years, 100 Stars - Women, she was number 3 on The 100 Greatest Sex Symbols (she could have been number 1), and she was number 11 on The 100 Greatest Pop Culture Icons. Very good!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
20th Century Fox's 2nd 'CINEMASCOPE' film
peterwhittle1428 August 2006
You may wonder "Why does Marilyn Monroe,Betty Grable & Lauren Bacall keep spreading across a lounge in so many scenes?" the answer is not vain- pleasure-seeking body language but CINEMASCOPE lens requirements.I watched this film on a old released Video Tape & delighted that it was a full-screen fixed camera issue & not a letterbox reduction release.I delighted in NOT seeing the person speaking & only the stilted recipient's reactions. You have to observe all the action as there are no camera angles or close ups.This was too 'startling' to a cinemascope theatre audience. What other film can boast a full orchestra opening with every member of that orchestra in full view of the cinema audience:-like in a live concert. The first Cinemascope film was 'The Robe' followed by 'How To Marry A Millionaire'. As the other reviewers has said;A 'feel-good' film with nostalgic 'old-time'high society values. Did anyone spot the 'moral' of the tale?.'Better to love for love's sake than for money'.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Three strong leading ladies in good comedy
Enchorde7 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Recap: Three young, single and beautiful girls with no more than a dollar between them rent a luxurious penthouse in New York with the single goal to find rich husbands for them all. But to find single and rich men is easier said than done, and the girls find that not all men is what they see. And those emotions that keep popping up is just annoying…

Comments: A rather funny comedy with three famous and strong leading ladies. The idea for the story is great and works well, even now more than 50 years later. It is a comedy first and foremost but also contains a not so subtle element about that money can't buy happiness or love. It got a lot of jokes but the best one is the running joke about Monroe's character Pola, who is blind as a bat and refuses to wear her glasses because she is afraid they will scare away a potential suitor. This leads to Pola following complete strangers instead of her date, or walking into walls.

It is not hilarious, but is entertaining enough to watch. Another reason to watch it is the three leading ladies, each and one of them famous in their own right, but managing to act well together.

6/10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bacall steals the movie!
bacall_fan1426 July 2002
Even though this film may be in the Marilyn Monroe collection I have to say her performance was not all that great. It was alright, but just decent. She is a stunning beauty with a nice figure, but is a rather bad actress.

Betty Grable I don't know very well. She did okay too, but seemed a little boring to me. I guess it was just her character Loco. She has beauty too and is an okay actress.

Lauren Bacall steals this show literally. She is the one who truly defines grace and glamour. Her character is witty and sly. Bacall's beauty is great too. I love her voice and how in the end she is the lucky girl!

The movie is about three roomates who go hunting for millionaire husbands. Will they suceed or not? If you are a fan of Lauren Bacall I suggest you see this one. She looks great in the fashion show!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the first movies I watched with Marilyn Monroe
Lady_Targaryen13 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
''How to Marry a Millionaire'' is a funny movie with a nice story. We have three mainly beautiful and famous actresses of the 50's: Betty Grable(the pin-up girl),Marilyn Monroe and Lauren Bacall. I guess this was one of the first movies I watched with Marilyn Monroe, and the first with Lauren Bacall. (Talking about her, I was surprised how much Kathleen Turner remembers her looks to Lauren!)

The plot is: Three women set up a plan to bring rich bachelors to them: they rent a big,beautiful and expensive apartment in an expensive neighbor, the best place to find millionaires, as Schatze Page says. Schatze is the ''Head'' of the plan, and Loco and Pola are her other two friends; they want three millionaires to marry and have a great life. As long as time is passing, they meet many guys, but they start to fall for the ones who are not financially secure. The big dilemma in this movie is: are they going to choose money or love?

aka "Como Agarrar um Milionário" - Brazil
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ready, Willing and Grable
laika-lives19 October 2008
First, a warning. 'How to Marry a Millionaire' comes prefaced by an apparently random five minute orchestral performance of 'Street Scene', a Gershwin-lite piece treated with the full pomp and ceremony of, well, Gershwin. Sitting through it takes some patience. If you have the DVD, rest assured, you can skip forward. You won't miss anything.

The film itself is one of the perpetual disappointments of 50's Hollywood, a movie so bolstered by major star-power, opulent mise-en-scene and perfect high-concept that failure seems inconceivable. The title alone is perfect. Generation after generation, however, are forced to ask themselves - how is this so limp? The script is an albatross about the production's neck, a dead, smelling thing that chokes everything and everyone before they can really spark to life. There are no comic situations, just isolated moments that play for laughs. Whenever an actual comedy scene threatens to develop, the movie quickly moves on to other, less interesting things. A case in point - the scene where the three leading ladies each bring a date to the same fancy restaurant. One of them, short-sighted, refuses to wear her spectacles out of vanity. One of the dates is married. A classic Hollywood farce set-up, surely, complete with mistaken identity, angry wife, and probably a pie in the face for somebody? Well, no. Instead, we cut between the three dates as the ladies react 'comically' to things their partners say. Hit the punchline, and cut to the next limp joke. If in doubt, have Marilyn walk into a wall. Where's Billy Wilder when you need him?

The three stars are almost a perfect diagram of the life cycle of the classic Hollywood screen goddess. This was one of Marilyn Monroe's breakout films, and the camera just eats her up, even though the script gives her nothing to do. She's so luminescent she almost seems newly hatched. Lauren Bacall, on the other hand, had been a major star for nearly a full decade, and she knows how to dominate the screen even when in frame with Monroe. She gets the only thing passing for a real role, and delivers the few good lines with a cynical snap - given the right material, she could have brought this thing to life. She's a curiously ageless actress - when she lies about her age in the film and claims to be forty, it isn't instantly ridiculous - and far less girlish than her co-stars, giving her a convincing authority. Betty Grable was far from ageless, and had a good eight years on her co-stars, putting her near the end of her Hollywood career. There's an air of desperation about her at times, stranded on screen with nothing but a toothpaste smile and a few scraps of comic timing, unable to play her real age but fooling no-one as a contemporary of this new, sharper generation of actresses, relying on the same old schtick that had served her throughout her career (for Marilyn-doubters, seeing the two juxtaposed in this movie helps to throw Monroe's subtlety and - yes - intelligence into sharp relief). She's also lumbered with the dead wood in terms of male co-stars (although all of the men - even the great William Powell - are guilty of lazy performances); she's unable to strike any comic sparks off them. Better to have given her role to the under-utilised Monroe, who could be funny all by herself, and left Grable with the repetitive Mr. Magoo routine.

That the movie is as enjoyable as it is can be put down to the luscious Hollywood production, the sort that renders even the twee likes of 'By the Light of the Silvery Moon' watchable. But somewhere, buried beneath the flabby jokes and professionalism, lies the rough outline of a sharp, cynical comedy about the business of marriage that Bacall could have made sing - and new generations of movie viewers will sit down with 'How to Marry a Millionaire' in expectation of that movie, ready to be disappointed all over again.
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed