Target Zero (1955) Poster

(1955)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Colorful cast, weak script in routine Korean war film
BrianDanaCamp3 April 2010
If you're looking for a hard-hitting Korean War film made in the 1950s, something that illuminates the anguish, tension and hard command decisions made in the heat of battle, you'll do well to seek out Sam Fuller's THE STEEL HELMET (1951), Anthony Mann's MEN IN WAR (1957), and Lewis Milestone's PORK CHOP HILL (1959). Even Tay Garnett's ONE MINUTE TO ZERO (1952), starring Robert Mitchum, has its penetrating moments. If, on the other hand, you're looking for laughable dialogue and hoary clichés, then you're best left with Harmon Jones' TARGET ZERO (1955), about allied soldiers—and a woman—lost behind enemy lines and wandering rather aimlessly over a sunny American landscape doubling for Korea.

You can tell where the film is going right after the opening credits as a truck carrying two women, an attractive American blonde and an Asian woman in fatigues, is hit by North Korean mortar shells and goes crashing into a ravine. The blonde gets out, a little shaken and dazed but thoroughly unscathed, with hair and makeup intact, while the poor Asian woman is dead, having had about one line of dialogue and mere minutes after the actress's name (Angela Loo) appeared in the credits. The hot blonde is Annie Galloway, a "biochemist" with the United Nations health team, and she's played by Peggie Castle, a regular in westerns and Mickey Spillane adaptations of the era. She quickly hooks up with a straggling English tank crew led by a sergeant named David (Richard Stapley), all of whom are then joined by a lost American platoon seeking Easy Company. The Americans commandeer the tank to aid their search and recruit Annie to act as nurse to a wounded man (Strother Martin) whom they place on the back of the tank. After a few miles of this she complains that the bouncing of the tank in motion is hurting the wounded man, so they take him off and make one of the soldiers carry him on his back, as if that wouldn't hurt him even more! Even if that soldier happens to be Charles Bronson!

The ranking American officer, Lt. Tom Flagler (Richard Conte), soon starts putting the moves on Annie, making the uptight English sergeant very jealous indeed. Annie, in an unlikely turn of events, eventually responds to Flagler's rather crude charms. At one point, they're in a bunker and exchange this dialogue after a rather foreseeable tragic occurrence: Annie: "What's the matter with me, Tom? Why can't I cry?" Tom: "You've been at war, Annie. In here, death is like rain. Some days you have it. Some days you don't." Annie: "It's all so distorted. Nothing seems real or lasting." Tom: "We're real, Annie. You and me." That's what the script is like.

Unlike the Korean War movies cited in my first paragraph, no one here ever seems to take their situation seriously enough. There's a wisecracking southerner named Felix (L.Q. Jones) who jokes at every turn. There's an American Indian named Geronimo (Abel Fernandez) who tells Felix that the Indians joined the army so they can learn the white man's fighting skills and take America back from them. Later, Flagler approaches Geronimo as he's preparing to face down attacking "Reds" and asks him, "Whaddaya say, Injun?" Geronimo responds with "Now I know how Custer felt." It's that kind of film.

L.Q. Jones and Strother Martin both play members of the platoon and would later famously team up as the pair of scuzzy bounty hunters, T.C. and Coffer, in Sam Peckinpah's THE WILD BUNCH. Chuck Connors (TV's "The Rifleman") turns up as radioman Moose. Aaron Spelling, the future TV mastermind behind "Charlie's Angels," "Fantasy Island," and "Love Boat," shows up as "Strangler," one of those annoying, obsequious little sidekicks you often saw in war movies (and Warner Bros. cartoons). Charles Bronson is his usual earnest self. Richard Conte walks through his part with a casualness that's a pale echo of the studied unflappability he brought to his roles as infantry grunts in World War II movies such as GUADALCANAL DIARY and A WALK IN THE SUN ("Everybody dies").

The film was shot on the grounds of Fort Carson, a U.S. Army base in Colorado, and made use of the Colorado Air National Guard in the film's one impressive combat sequence, in which we see a team of four fighter jets attack the oncoming Reds as our heroes defend a hill called "Sullivan's Muscle." The jets do some stunning maneuvers and are seen in shots with the actors, including one startling bit where a jet appears from below and flies right over Conte's head. That must've required some heavy-duty persuasion.

In another comment here, the writer mentions "freezing winter conditions" and "the plight of civilians." The terrain presented here seems quite sunny and warm and if there were any scenes with civilians, they were completely absent from the print of this film that I saw.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Buffs The Genre.
rmax30482312 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It's Korea and the Chinese have just overrun the Allied lines. A disparate group of men (and one babe) find themselves flung together, struggling across plains and knolls, hoping to reach the safety of Easy Company on a hill top called "the muscle." Richard Conte is the ranking officer, a lieutenant, who organizes the few Brits with their tank, and gathers up an errant mortar couple, and woos the babe (Peggie Castle) who, through thick and thin, never gets her hair mussed or loses her false eyelashes.

Conte and Castle fall in love after twelve hours together, which runs about normal for these routine flicks. This is highly resented by the British sergeant who commands the tank. Why? Well, during the war, England was overflowing with Americans who were resented by some of the English gentlemen because they were "overpaid, oversexed, and over here." (Kids, that's World War II, the one that came after World War I.) The sergeant is particularly annoyed because, well, one of the Yanks began dating his sister and, well, "it didn't end pleasantly." However, have no fear. By the end, when they finally reach "the muscle" and find all of Easy Company dead and then they have to fight off innumerable bandy legged, inscrutable Chinese troops -- do they make friends with one another? Does Conte smile and pat the sergeant on the back, and does the sergeant smile back? You're kidding.

Conte is an interesting actor. He has two expressions: one is a smirk and the other isn't. Not to laugh. It carried Gary Cooper through several generations of movie-goers. As for his apparent power over the good-looking, hypermastic Peggie Castle, well, so what? A few men have that ability to win attractive women over with a glance. I know I do. Just the other day in the supermarket, a blond who could have doubled for Scarlett Johhanson, threw herself at my feet and begged to be my slave. I sent her packing. These importunings get tiresome after a while.

But back to the movie. It contains of one of those -- "FREEZE! We're in the middle of a mine field" scenes. Very tense.

The whole affair comes across as one of those television programs that were being made wholesale during the period. No soldier ever really gets dirty or dusty. Lots of action. The lighting is flat, as it would be on, say, "I Love Lucy."

Why go on? You want to watch a movie that's almost as ritualized and predictable as a church service, this is it? If you want a genuine attempt at vernacular poetry, try "A Walk in The Sun." If you want realism, pre special fx, try "The Story of G.I. Joe."
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tank should have been blown up
bkoganbing23 October 2017
Target Zero is your typical war film, this one set in Korea and it gave some due to one other nation present on the peninsula. Richard Conte leading an American squad finds themselves a 3 man British tank crew headed by Richard Stapley. That tank prove to be essential though there is one rather unreal scene where the tank should have been blown up.

Shapley doesn't like Americans he saw his sister ravaged by one during the last war. You know that British saying about the Yanks, "overpaid, oversexed, and over here". Words he lives by.

And there is a woman in the mix. Peggie Castle and Angela Loo UN health workers also stuck behind the lines. Loo is killed and Castle gets both Conte and Shapley's mojo going.

They're trying to reach the rest of Conte's company. What happens when they do is one nasty climatic battle.

One scene I thought rather stupid. The group uses the protection of the tank to clear a path through a mine field. I have to think in real life the tank would have been crippled and useless trying it. Could not buy that at all.

The film is rich in character players though. Charles Bronson is Conte's sergeant and he's got such people as L.Q. Jones, Strother Martin and Chuck Connors among the troops.

An average war film, nothing special.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A scratch-crew of soldiers must plug a hole in the Allied line in Korea
bluegerm22 October 2000
Usually Leonard Maltin and I agree on movies....

Not this one. I have seen it perhaps four or five times. An American unit, sitting astride a strategic hilltop, plugging the Main Line of Resistance, is over-run and wiped out. Only a patrol and some stragglers picked up along the way are able to reach the now-undefended hilltop in time.

I found this story to ring true....with good characterizations and plot developments. Sure, the enemy is the two-dimensional Yellow Menace....that's standard with fifties-era movies.....but the mix of up-and-coming young actors is in itself worth the time to view this film.

A good story, well-acted, worthy of a look. And quite useful to someone trying to get a real look at war in Korea after the conflict settled into a stalemate. I recommend it.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Now I know just how Custer felt
kapelusznik1813 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** Stuck behind enemy lines Korean War movie with Richard Conte as the happy go lucky without a care in the world Let. Tom Flagler winning the war almost all by himself. It's Let. Flagler who loses his innocence in the war swirling all around him when the love of his life US Army infantry unit Easy Company gets wiped out by a human wave assault of North Korean troops. Up until then noting bothered Let. Flagler thinking the separated from the main battalion Easy Company was safe and out of harms way. It's then that Let.Flagler becomes suicidal and lets his and his men down by getting so depressed that that they can't relay on him with a major North Korean assault on his position is just about to materializer!

Up until then Let. Flagler could do nothing wrong in being focus on his mission to get his men together with a British tank crew back across enemy lines. So focused that her didn't even realize that US Army nurse Ann Galloway, Peggie Castle,was just crazy about him and his macho-like attitude towards war as well as everything else. It's the in house armature psychiatrist of his unit Sgt. Vince Gaspari played by a young, age 34, and clean shaven, it's hard to recognize him without his famous mustache, Charles Bronson who gives us in the audience as well as Peggie an insight to Let. Flagler's mine-set. His only love is his company and no one or nothing else and when it was wiped out by the North Koreans he just flipped out!

****SPOILERS**** With the North Koreans now ready to charge up the hill and annihilate Let. Flagler and his men as well as nurse Galloway he finally comes to his senses as well as survival instincts and uses, by land line telephone, the entire US Army Air Force and Navy to do them in. It strange to see hundreds if not thousands of North Korean soldiers just march like lemmings to their death as a deadly combination of US jet fighters as well as massive US navel bombardment chops them to pieces! Even the few North Koreans that make it to Lt. Flagler's forward positions are just blasted by the few US as well as British defenders as if they were harmless bowling pins! As for the North Korean soldiers all they had to fight with against the ultra modern US and British military were what looked like turn of the century bolt action rifles that in most case didn't seem to work!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rare but a bit weak.
searchanddestroy-131 January 2022
I will forever prefer Anthony Mann's MEN IN WAR, concerning Korean war from the US Army point of view. This film is not uninteresting, good acting, but I don't understand what women do in this film. This is a men's story; sure Bob Aldrich would have made something different. Harmon Jones deserves to be discovered again, or discovered at all, he was a director whose filmography is more than worth watching: GORILLA AT LARGE, BEAST OF BUDAPEST, CANYON RIVER, DAY OF FURY....
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Amazingly flat.
planktonrules14 June 2017
There have been some very good Korean War flicks..."Target Zero" really isn't one of them. Instead, the film is pretty dull...as well as ridiculous.

The film begins with a small band of American soldiers finding a hot blonde (Peggy Castle) as they try to get back to their unit. This part of the film really annoyed me, as the well-coiffed lady NEVER would have been in this situation and it seemed beyond just a bit contrived. Soon, they come upon a British tank and its crew and a bit later they come upon an American Lieutenant and some more men. Together, this rag-tag group of men...and a woman...need to fight their way back to safety.

This film seemed pretty dull and offered little in the way of excitement. It also had some silly dialog and never seemed the least bit credible or interesting.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Interesting Cast & Blonde Bombshell Peggy Castle Illuminate Typical Film
LeonLouisRicci13 March 2015
Spot the Upcoming Stars is as Good as it Gets in this Standard, Clichéd, Static, and Pretentiously Penned Korean War Flick. The Dialog Tries Mightily to be Poetic and Insightful but is Nothing but Lame, Sophomoric, and Silly.

Richard Conte Leads this Band of Stereotypes, who are Introduced in a Prolog with a Jingoistic Melting Pot of American Soldiers Brought Together to Fight the Invading Commies.

This is a Typical 1950's Movie About Fighting Men. Made Just a Few Years After the Conflict Ended, Seems to Offer a Forced and Apologetic Tribute to the 50,000 Americans Who Perished in the Stalemate.

Peggie Castle is Recruited to Nurse the Wounded and is a Striking Blonde Bombshell that is Somehow Found on the Frontlines Amidst the Action but Never Loses Her Made Up Fifties Style Face and Hairdoo.

While Nice to Look At Among the Goofy Grunts, She is Only There for Love (and marriage) Interest for the Soon to be Returning Lieutenant, Have Some Baby Boomers, and Live Happily Ever After.

Overall, a Somewhat Bland Movie with One Good Action Sequence and can Only be Recommended for War Movie Completest.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
old war movie
SnoopyStyle19 November 2020
It's Korea 1952. The war has descended into a grinding morass. There are various soldiers and non-coms of the coalition trying to survive the unrelenting death machine. Ann Galloway's car gets blown off a ridge. She's picked up by a British tank crew driving an American Sherman. They encounter a squad of American soldiers led by Lt. Tom Flagler who aims to head for a hill which has been surrounded after the push by the Chinese.

The dialogue is stale and the actors don't always help. Peggie Castle is more notable for her perfect hair and beautiful face. She has an overly dramatic breakdown scene. Charles Bronson has a minor role but at least, he delivers his self-contained brute. The filming and the acting are all pretty flat. There is some real action with real machinery. It's not exciting due to its old filming techniques. Mowing down the enemy is done with the old style dying. It's all rather old fashion.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the few Korean war films...
Mark_Marcon6 January 2005
Good depiction of the Korean war. Desperate, cut-off UN troops must fight their back to a strategic hill where they hope to be relieved. The action is good with all the elements of the war, a fanatical enemy, little support for UN forces, and freezing winter conditions. Though the love interest may have been unnecessary the film is realistic, especially depicting the plight of civilians and well acted. Surprising that there is no DVD/VHS release as other Korean war films are available. The naval gunfire support using real footage is good though the accuracy achieved somewhat imaginary. The tone of the film is grim and gritty throughout. Reminiscent of "Combat" in look and feel. Highly Recommended.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weak stereotypical war film
buystuffrnh22 November 2020
Awfull script. Decent cast deliver performances well below their ability. Simply should not have been this bad a film....but it is.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreary
dougdoepke13 November 2011
Korea, 1952, a UN patrol and a woman are trapped behind red Chinese lines.

Unfortunately, this war film comes close to being truly dreary with about every cliché in the book. Had director Jones registered some troubled emotion from a generally talented cast, it would have helped. Instead, Conte and company act as if being trapped in combat is little more than a walk in the park. And what could be more absurd than those wooden romantic scenes in the middle of life and death.

Then too, the script registers some genuinely leaden dialog, along with limp action staging that has all the combat intensity of a round of hide and seek. Good thing for our side that the Chinese bunch up across open terrain so that a couple of bullets can mow 'em all down.

I get no satisfaction from belaboring these results since I recall when the movie was shot south of Colorado Springs and we high school boys were thrilled at seeing a movie star like the lovely Castle. (Look quickly and you can see Cheyenne Mountain where air tracking defenses for North America are now located underground.)

Still, the movie does have one stunning sequence where a squadron of Lockheed jets swoops really low over uneven terrain to drop their napalm. It's a breath-taking air show. Nonetheless, I expect the movie's most memorable feature are the up-and-comers in the supporting cast—Bronson, Connors, and future TV mogul Aaron Spelling. All in all, however, it's an unfortunately forgettable 90-minutes of people managing to go through the motions.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An unimpressive Korean war action/drama...
AlsExGal24 January 2023
... from Warner Brothers and director Harmon Jones. After a major battle leaves United Nations forces scattered, an unlikely squadron forms: an American army platoon led by Lt. Flagler (Richard Conte), a British tank crew led by Sgt. Kensemmit (Richard Wyler), and stranded American aid worker Ann Galloway (Peggie Castle). This meager outfit must try to survive in hostile conditions long enough to rendezvous with allied forces. Also featuring Charles Bronson, Chuck Connors, L. Q. Jones, John Alderson, Terence de Marney, John Dennis, Angela Loo, Joby Baker, Abel Fernandez, Strother Martin, Don Oreck, and Aaron Spelling.

This low-budget war picture is of note purely for the interesting cast of future film and TV stars, including Bronson, Connors, Jones, Martin, and TV mega-producer Aaron Spelling as Private Strangler. The conflict here goes beyond the UN forces vs the Communists, as it also includes tank commander Wyler resenting American Conte because an American made time with Wyler's sister during WW2. Not very compelling drama. Castle's character seems to exist purely to add a female to the cast, a trend that I've noticed with more than war film. Some of the action scenes work well, while others look like bad television. There's a lot of awful rear-screen work, too.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
True to life interaction
jackstillwaggon27 July 2021
I disagree with the negative reviews. Obviously, it's beyond unusual to have a beautiful woman in combat with a platoon. Other than that, the lieutenant (I was one) examines the terrain, makes decisions on the disposition of the troops, encourages them and doesn't ask them to do anything he wouldn't do. He knows details about each of his men. We were required to carry a small notebook at all times with data on each Marine in our platoons, including blood type, boot size, family, etc. I thought Conte and Bronson, the senior sergeant, were much more realistic than most movies. The brief discussion and mutual understanding of the tactical situation are real. I only question why the Korean and the Apache were always on point. Why not rotate such a dangerous role? One review felt there was too much joking around but so many Irish wakes I've attended have more laughter than tears. Probably a way to release tension.

Small point but when they saved the North Korean trucks to get fuel and searched American dead for weapons and ammo, I thought that they must have had a good military advisor's help on the movie. Well done.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bit Cheesy war movie with some romance
Christysmile12327 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Well, My father was in this picture though he is an un-credited extra. He was one of several soldiers that died on a hill, Can not even tell which one he is Not too bad of a movie for when it was made, a bit silly at times especially the romantic parts...Yeah romance in a war movie...A bit Cheesy
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed