The Lonely Man (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Very interesting and well done
TheLittleSongbird12 November 2017
With an on paper intriguing story and a cast that includes Jack Palance, Anthony Perkins, Lee Van Cleef and Elisha Cook Jnr. 'The Lonely Man' promised a lot. And it delivers a lot too luckily.

Have admittedly seen fairly little of director Henry Levin's body of work, but the little seen of him has left me somewhat indifferent. To me though, 'The Lonely Man' is among his better and more interesting films and is worthy of more attention than the not-very-well-known status it's garnered. Sure, it's not perfect and there are better westerns around but 'The Lonely Man' has a lot to recommend and has a few interest points (including Anthony Perkins in an early role pre-Norman Bates, him and Palance trying to out-smoulder each other and the Oedipal relationship between Riley and Ada).

The Oedipal relationship did feel underdeveloped and doesn't have anywhere near the passion and poignancy of the evolving father and son relationship between Jacob and Riley that dominates 'The Lonely Man'. Elaine Aiken does her best but is a little bland in a role that doesn't give her that much to do.

Occasionally, the general tightness of the pace loosens and becomes a little too leisurely and there are a few things in the story and supporting characters (King Fisher's allies also felt on the underwritten side) that could have done with more exploration and made sense more.

Conversely, 'The Lonely Man' does look great. The cinematography is truly beautiful on the eyes as well as being suitably moody, and the very natural and handsome locales are similarly well done. The music suits the atmosphere well, having a sweep and understatement. Levin's direction is efficient rather than the routine direction somewhat expected.

'The Lonely Man' is tautly written and sometimes has an offbeat tone, while the story is mostly very absorbing and there is a surprising amount of emotion. It is especially good in the father and son relationship, which has initial tension but once the truth comes out it's quite affecting and one roots for a redemptive resolution. The climax is one that had me biting the nails and had me feeling very sad about the outcome (see for yourself).

Perkins acquits himself pretty well in an early role, though he definitely went on to better things (including one of cinema's most iconic villains as Norman Bates in 'Psycho'), and Neville Brand is a formidable opponent with suitably heavyweight support from Van Cleef and Cook. The acting honours however belong to Palance, a powerhouse in a role that suits him to the ground and the type he should have done more of. It was really fascinating seeing he and Perkins out-smoulder each other but, while they work incredibly well, Perkins is no match for Palance in that department. Mainly because we're talking about an early career actor against one with one of the most intimidating physiques in "classic film/Golden Age film".

Overall, a well done and interesting different western that flaws and all should be better known. 7/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Breaking Horses, Hearts and Boys.
hitchcockthelegend9 April 2013
The Lonely Man is directed by Henry Levin and written by Harry Essex and Robert Smith. It stars Jack Palance, Anthony Perkins, Elaine Aiken, Neville Brand, Robert Middleton, Elisha Cook Jr. and Claude Akins. It's a VistaVision production with cinematography by Lionel Lindon, music scored by Van Cleave and the title track sung by Tennessee Ernie Ford.

Trying to leave his gun slinging days behind him, Jacob Wade (Palance) tries desperately to bond with his son Riley (Perkins) who blames him for his Mother's death.

From the outset as Tennessee Ernie Ford warbles a soft ballad over the opening credits, you know that we are in for a Western sorrowful in tone, and so it proves. I confess it's a film I hadn't really heard of before and kind of stumbled upon it by accident. It certainly seems to be under seen, while judging by the lack of written critique's for it, most probably forgotten by those who viewed it many years ago.

It's a film with problems, there is no getting away from that, but for the Western fan who has a bent for films like Shane, The Gunfighter and Unforgiven (and it is no way in the same league as these pictures) it has narrative rewards. There is very little action here, a couple of horse pursuits (though these are very well filmed and are exciting) and a short gunfight are about as thrilling as it gets, because this is very much a character study and smiles are very much in short supply. Story follows father and estranged son forming an uneasy alliance as Jacob tries to set Riley up for the future, truths will out along the way and Jacob's past is coming back to haunt him. There's a girl in the middle, naturally, and health will also come into play.

Filmed out of the Sierra Mountains, Lone Pine and the Mojave Desert, the back drops are excellent. Lionel Lindon's black and white photography is a real asset to the picture in how it captures the mournful mood of the story. While for the finale we move into noir territory as Levin and Lindon darken the skies and bring the atmospheric shadows, and this is something that perfectly cloaks what unfolds in the story. The support cast is like a whose who of Western character actors: Elisha Cook Jr., Neville Brand, Claude Akins, Lee Van Cleef, Denver Pyle, Harry Shannon and John Douchette, all of whom owe the Western fan nothing. But here lies one of the film's major problems…

With a dialogue heavy picture such as this, we reasonably expect good characterisations, unfortunately we just don't get that. Palance is basically required to just look tough and emote when faced with Perkins' whiny barbs. Oh they are good at being emotive and whiny respectively, but the screenplay just doesn't ask anything of them, with some interesting threads dangled but never expanded upon. Aiken is stock female fodder, and again she plays a character that just exists since the interesting possibilities are not explored. Then there's the number of characters played by those wonderful Western actors that just drift in and out of the film with no chance to impact on proceedings. Brand does get a neat role, and shows a good mean streak whilst introducing us to some cowardly bastard tactics, but he's still under written.

The lack of depth to plotting and complexity of principal characters is such a shame, as is the uneven direction of Levin. Yet I personally was very pleased to have seen this, it has some merits in the "moody redemption" splinter of Western films. A cautious and generous 7/10 from me.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Like Henry King's "The Gunfighter," Levin equates victory with redemption
Nazi_Fighter_David20 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Jacob Wade (Jack Palance) used to be a celebrated shootist just stepping into middle age and mortally weary of having to be asked to leave every town he rides into… To make matters worse, a few notorious outlaws, led by the vile King (Neville Brand), are also out to take him down…

Now he tries to do something for his boy Riley (Anthony Perkins) by catching and breaking mustangs in Echo Canyon, the best wild horse country in the territory…

Complicating the situations further is Jacob's bad relationship with a kid who hates him, and Ada Marshall (Elaine Aiken), a young woman whom Jacob met in a gambling hall, and shot a man on account of her…

Here is a thinking person's Western that deals with one ex-gunman who also is unable to shake his past and whose ultimate goal for taking root again is by lynching…

Levin shows a dark, depressing, and sadly realistic face of the west... In fact, the entire movie is a drama of characters… But watching the film, you would be able to feel how Levin equates victory with redemption
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth a look!!
daddymention14 May 2003
I looked at all the comments made for this film, but I feel I need to mention what's good about it. The acting and characters are first-rate and there are several familiar faces. The black and white cinematography is the best I've ever seen in a western...The location is wonderful--all in all the best looking western ever!!!! These things alone make it worth watching... I agree that the plot has lots of holes and needs some explaining at times, and answers to many questions are never given... But give this film a try...it's still very good!
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is a different type of western.
movie-buff20 March 2001
This isn't the cowboys vs. indians or "saved by the Cavalry" formulaic western. There is characterization! Jack Palance delivers a great performance. He can act when the script and director allowed him. Tony Perkins seems to be the same character as he was in Tin Star. Great outdoor scenery; the studio should have paid the extra cost to film this in Technicolor.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not as great as Mann films, but still good
turkam25 August 2002
I found "Lonely Man' in a local library. I can't believe it only has 26 votes on the IMDB. This is not as great as the Anthony Mann films I've studied in grad school. There is one with Anthony Perkins called "The Tin Star" which I would recommend more. But, this is still a good Western which doesn't follow the conventional theme/structure narrative. Worth a look.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One for Perkins-Palance fans!
JohnHowardReid6 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A talkative and somewhat slow-moving western that gradually builds to a good climax, The Lonely Man is further hampered by the casting of two super-slow talkers, namely Jack Palance and Anthony Perkins, in the leading roles. When these two men are on screen, I always have the feeling that they speak slowly because they feel the dialogue has a depth to it which is not readily apparent to a bum director like Henry Levin, so they are forced to do his job for him by speaking extra slowly so that the audience will get all the hidden nuances that Levin has neither the guts nor the ability to bring out. True, Levin had a reputation as a fast shooter and I've no doubt the movie is not as effective as it might have been had Levin been forced to direct the rest of the film with as much care as he brings to the Palace-Perkins scenes and to the climactic gun fight. Fortunately, the rugged natural locales of the story are impressively captured by cinematographer Lionel Lindon, and a young actress named Elaine Aiken makes an impressive debut, but alas, nothing came of her career. She had minor roles in Doomsday Voyage, Night Flowers, Caddyshack and that's it! The Lonely Man is available on a very good Paramount DVD.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tense, Character-Driven Western with an Impressive Jack Palance
ThomasMuf24 September 2019
THE LONELY MAN, made in 1957, stars a forceful Jack Palance as a gunfighter who wishes to "retire", settle down, and make amends with his son, played by Anthony Perkins in the same type of nervous nelly role that would make him famous in "Psycho" three years later. So, in the proud tradition of Henry King's classic "The Gunfighter" and others. From a script by Harry Essex ("Creature from the Black Lagoon"), and capably directed by Henry Levin, who had much impressed me with his Glenn Ford vehicle "The Man from Colorado" all these years ago. Fantastic b/w photography by Lionel Lindon; excellent, sensitive score by (Nathan) Van Cleave. While not terribly original, this leisurely paced, character-driven drama is worth seeking out.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Myths of manhood and the frightening visage of Jack Palance
MBunge23 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The Lonely Man is a decent little tale about manhood highlighted by the presence of the orc-like Jack Palance as one of the most frightening looking heroes any Western's ever seen.

Jacob Wade (Jack Palance) is a gunfighter with a long and murderous reputation. 14 years after abandoning his wife and child, Wade returns home to teach his hateful son how to be a man. Riley (Anthony Perkins) has nothing but contempt for his father and since his mother's death has become a bum, living in a hovel and hanging around the local saloon. Things are further complicated by the fact that Wade's villainous past is well known in the area, making him and his son decidedly unwelcome in any law abiding town. When Riley falls ill, Wade is forced to return to the horse ranch and the woman he left on his quest to redeem his child. Aida (Elaine Aiken) is desperately in love with Wade and only wants him to stay with her. She's even willing to put up with his pain-in-the-butt son if it keeps Wade near her.

As Wade tries to make a man of Riley in the pursuit of a wild stallion, he's helped by one member of his old gang and menaced by another, while a threat grows in the unseen distance. A man named King was nearly killed by Wade in a fight over Aida, but they fished the bullet out of him and he's determined to end Wade's life with it. There's also another problem Wade has kept secret from everyone and it's the real reason he's so desperate to turn Riley from a whining child to a grown man.

At its heart, The Lonely Man is about the 1950s definition of masculinity, or at least the 1950s fantasy about the masculinity of the Old West. Jacob Wade may be a terrible killer, but he's a man because he takes control of his life and makes no excuses for the decisions he's made. His old friend Ben (Robert Middleton) is an intemperate loudmouth, but he's a man because he's true to his friend. Even Aida fits into the concept of manhood through a feminine lens, being willing to sacrifice everything she is to protect the people the man she loves. Riley, though showing some strength of character, isn't a man because of his wallowing in self-pity and adolescent sloth. Even King is the bad guy of the story not because he seeks to kill Wade, but because of the unmanly way he plans to do it.

Acting-wise, Anthony Perkins does a good job playing the emotionally wounded and callow Riley, though he seems a bit too old for the role. Elaine Aiken as Aida fits beautifully as a woman in this manly world and she looks right for the part, as well. Put most attractive women next to the terrifyingly striking Palance and they'll look like two different species, but Aiken has a tough, somewhat worn edge to her appearance. She's the sort of hard woman that could love a hard man. Palance almost perfectly embodies the pre-1960s image of American masculinity. He's stoic and taciturn and haunted and strong. He's the hero from a time when heroes weren't supposed to say funny one-liners after they killed someone. It was sidekicks, women, children and even villains who used to get the humorous or poignant dialog while the men were plain and without affectation.

The Lonely Man was one truly "EWWWWW!" producing moment and ends in a fairly clichéd gunfight after promising something more interesting, but it's a fast-paced and relatively adult story that only seems dated in contrast to modern standards of manhood (or the lack thereof). I'd definitely recommend watching it.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Lonely Men
osloj27 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
*** This review may contain spoilers ***

*Plot and ending analyzed*

A few scenes come to mind in The Lonely Man (1957), a unique Western. It has Jack Palance, as a misunderstood gunfighter. Jack Palance's physique matches his laconic attitude. We don't know whether he truly is evil at heart, or a killer. We believe it at first, but then, we see that he is nothing but a fragile human who is going blind. He exists in the wild West where men will kill you for nothing. He has merely defended himself.

Townspeople want him out of their town, a few rivals want him dead. Anywhere he goes, he is treated like a pariah.

Jack Palance wants to find his son (Anthony Perkins) before it is too late. Anthony Perkins doesn't want anything to do with him, but goes with him nonetheless. When they get to a town, Anthony Perkins wants to simply go to eat, but Jack Palance says, "A man first takes care of his horse." That scene to me is stupendous, it is what makes Westerns so good. A cowboy who knows the ways of the West.

Elisha Cook Jr., Neville Brand, Lee Van Cleef, Claude Akins and Denver Pyle are just a few familiar Western actors in the film. This is a nice character study.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A so-so western from a mediocre director
MOscarbradley17 October 2014
Anthony Perkins had yet to find his feet when he made "The Lonely Man" in 1957, cast as former outlaw Jack Palance's son, but he's remarkably assured nevertheless. It's a so-so western from a mediocre director, Henry Levin, with Palance the lonely man of the title, wanting to go straight but finding both the law and his former partners doing all they can to see that he doesn't. A first class supporting cast, (Neville Brand, Robert Middleton, Lee Van Cleef, Claude Akins) ensure that it's never less than watchable and it's very handsomely photographed in black and white VistaVision by Lionel Lindon. It's a pity the script never really develops the characters beyond the one-dimensional and now it is very seldom shown.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A film well worth a visit
jamesgavin120 October 2003
This film has got merit not least the photography. It is beautifully shot and the location has much to admire. There is a touch of John Ford in parts. Its main strength is the performance by Jack Palance. Anthony Perkins is ok but he has not a lot to do. Small parts by familiar actors adds to the attractions of the film which is well worth a viewing. One of my childhood best loved films which I was not disappointed with when I watched it recently.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enforced retirement
bkoganbing24 December 2016
Jack Palance looks kind of odd with that mustache he wore for The Lonely Man. Still he's not the psychotic Palance we've seen in many of his films. He's the world weary gunfighter who's looking to get out of the business. But the notorious King Fisher played by Neville Brand who nearly died from a gunfight with Palance is looking to settle old accounts with Palance.

Of course King Fisher in fact was a real notorious gunman who operated in Texas. Brand gives a nice performance, but this is most definitely not King Fisher's story.

Anthony Perkins who specialized in playing callow youths in the Fifties is Palance's son along for the ride unwillingly because Palance left his mother way back when who is dead now. Perkins just has no other place to go.

In fact Palance has one very good reason for leaving gunfighting which I will not reveal. His only hope is that he can move as far as he can.

Palance and Perkins do strike a nice balance as the world weary father and his rebellious and a bit stupid son. There's also a nice supporting cast with people like Lee Van Cleef, Elisha Cook,Jr. and Robert Middleton and Claude Akins. All tried and true cinema villains though they're not all villains here.

A downer of a film,still nicely done.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not an effective western about a father-son relationship
cglassey30 October 1998
Warning: Spoilers
It is not clear just what the creators of this film had in mind. It does have some worthwhile sequences of the actors riding on horse back chasing wild horses. What that had to do with the rest of the film is not at all clear.

The relation between the son (played oddly by Tony Perkins (Psycho)) and the former lover of his father (the father is decently acted by Jack Palance) was a film disaster. Obviously the creators wanted to go in the direction of a romantic triangle (younger woman falls for older man's son) but the attraction is completely nonsensical because the son is sullen, rude, and distinctly un-heroic throughout the whole film. No woman tough enough to live on her own in an isolated mountain ranch would fall for such a useless man.

The end scene is also absurd as the son helps his dying father shoot the bad guy dead in what has to be the stupidest possible fashion. This is NOT one of the better westerns filmed in the 1950s.

I will say one thing for it, those actors sure could ride horses. I wonder where it was filmed? Wyoming?
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A forgettable western even with Jack Palance and Anthony Perkins.
gitrich28 October 1998
Jack Palance and Anthony Perkins give decent performances in this boring western that is filled with meaningless dialog and unbelievable situations. Location in Long Pine California brings some realism even in black and white but I still can not recommend The Lonely Man.
7 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Probably not a movie for those who like to root for the good guy
non_sportcardandy5 November 2005
Since childhood I've found the actors playing the bad guys more interesting than the main characters,at least till about 1970 or so.Many that I viewed in the 1950's didn't last long in a movie or TV program because they were an early victim to the star.Some eventually went on to make names for their selves but for the most part I liked them more when playing minor roles.Some of those minor role villains are in this movie and I found them very entertaining.There's Neville Brand playing King Fisher,a good performer but sometimes a little bit to scary even for me when dealing out punishment.Others like Faro (Lee Van Cleef),Sundown Whipple(John Doucette) and Blackburn(Claude Akins) are in top menacing form.While not a household name another quality performer is Robert Middleton playing Ben Ryerson.Whether playing a politician or a mob boss he gives a quality performance.In this movie he's a bit grubby looking but handy with both a gun and a knife.Then there's Willie (Elisha Cook Jr) one of Fisher's men.He usually bursts into a room big eyed bearing news but has to grab a quick drink before speaking.So much to my delight the cast includes a rouge's gallery of personal favorites,almost like a dream come true.For those who like the good guys the movie leans more towards a nightmare.Jack Palance plays Jacob Wade the main character.As usual he has the look of a strong tough looking man.His performance is better than usual but that just means it's not as stiff as usual.The story lacks a bit of direction also.Those two points are forgotten because of Anthony Perkins who plays Jacob Wade's son Riley.His part lacks direction or maybe a director as it seems like he or someone else wants to sabotage this movie.First off he's too old and big to be playing the part of the son.When he does show some sign of a emotion it's fitting more for someone at least 10 years younger than him.To the simple statement that his mother(deceased) was a fine woman he responds blandly"talk about my mother again and I'll kill you",really off the wall.Elaine Aiken gives a good performance and is nice looking.In another comment it was basically said her character with it's good qualities has no reason to be interested romantically in the wimpy Perkins character,that's hitting the nail on the head.So this movie was just about what I expected,the minor roles out shining the main characters.One of the main characters looked like a good friend must of gave them the part.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed