Quatermass 2 (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
86 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
An unsung fifties sci fi classic.
youroldpaljim25 February 2002
I first saw this film once when I was about five or six years old on TV. Because the film had location shooting at an oil refinery, for years I was always reminded of this film when ever I drove past one, wondering if something sinister was going on inside those tanks. However, soon after I first saw this film, QUATERMASS 2 (or ENEMY FROM SPACE-as it was called here in the USA), was pulled from distribution for various legal reasons, and this film was for years impossible to view. Then the film was released from its legal limbo in the mid eighties and I purchased a video copy as soon as it came out.

Unlike so many hard to view films that have been promoted as "a long lost classic", that often turn out not to live up to their reputations when finally viewed again*, QUATERMASS 2 truly deserves its reputation as a rediscovered lost classic. It is one of the best British science fictions films from the fifties.

The films acting and direction are uniformly good. The black and white photography is excellent and the film has an excellent musical score (although sometimes the music is a bit too loud.) The scene where the giant aliens burst from the domes is one of my favorite scenes in a fantastic film. Its like something out of a nightmare: the dome begins to crack, like a giant egg, and emerging from is not a cute little chick, but a hideous malignancy. The gloomy dark gray lighting enhance this scene. However, the aliens that emerge, while gross and repulsive looking when viewed for the first time, begin to look a tad bit silly after repeated viewings.

Perhaps one of the most interesting thing about this film when viewed today, is the films story has many similarities to the "Area 51" mythology. In the film there is government owned plant where everything is top secret, it gets unlimited tax payer funding, but no one in the government dare asks whats going on. This sounds lot like what we are told about the so-called "Area 51." I'm surprised " psycho/social reductionists" like Curtis "Watch The Skies" Peebles overlooked this film. Then again, maybe we are lucky they have.

QUATERMASS 2 is an excellent fifties science fiction that should be more widely shown. Like the other films in the famous "Quatermass" series, its literate, suspenseful and thrilling.

*Sometimes the films promoted as "long lost classics" aren't even lost!
31 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Never trust a person with skin problems
Vomitron_G17 July 2006
Thanks to a good friend I'm currently undergoing what sci-fi fans refer to as "the Quatermass-experience". That simply means watching the three QUATERMASS-movies in a short time period. The first one felt like a true sci-fi classic, but I honestly couldn't really tell, because I haven't seen enough of those black & white sci-fi flicks to compare it too. But I'm working on that.

After having seen QUATERMASS 2, I'm starting to get convinced that those movies really are a stellar trilogy (even though the individual stories aren't actually related). This second installment was the first British movie ever to feature a number "2" in its title, to indicate that it's a sequel. The movie itself shows a lot of similarities with the original INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS (an alien organism invading earth, loss of human identity, a common higher consciousness, a global threat at hand...). But since they were produced around the same time none of the movies can be accused of stealing from each other.

Writer Nigel Kneale presents us a solid, coherent story undermined with plausible scientific facts. To put it rather simply: an organism not of this earth infects humans and even infiltrates the highest ranks of the British government. The story moves at a decent pace and never gets boring. Val Guest's directing is as good as it gets for a movie from the 50's. He clearly knew what he was doing on the set. Some minor continuity problems can be encountered (some night shots feature a few glimpses of daylight) and at least one scene seemed a bit artificially staged for convenience's sake (the one where Broadhead and Quatermass get their passes from the ministry-chap). But all that really isn't anything to complain about.

I sort of liked Brian Donlevy as Quatermass. He really feels like the prototype of an anti-hero. He's often a bit rude and really persistent. Especially that last characteristic made his character more believable. The rest of the acting was also decent, though all of the supporting roles were too small to be memorable. And I so much liked the fact that there wasn't an obligatory love-interest in the plot for Mr. Quatermass. That simply would not have worked.

There were a few details I really liked, like when Quatermass arrives in that little town in the area of Winterton Flats (or was it Willingdon Flats?). All the inhabitants work for the alien-infested factory and they have posters on the wall with slogans like "Remember: Secrets mean sealed lips" and "Talk about your job. Lose it". Another cool thing about the story was that it was actually Quatermass who designed the factory facility with the domes, which was originally to be a moon-colonization project. Only, the government stole his design and build it here on earth, for the alien organism to adapt itself. The factory was an excellent location and felt real. So were the few special effects (mainly miniatures of the domes). The 'rocket-lift-off' shots and effects looked rather silly though. I'm glad this movie was in black & white, that way, when we finally see the alien organism in all its giant glory, it looked a bit more terrifying.

So if you're curious about the history of sci-fi movies, than you just can not miss this one. Now I'm really looking forward to see QUATERMASS AND THE PIT.
31 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Taut, well-crafted early Hammer horror movie
Matti-Man2 August 2006
The second of the Quatermass films (the first was THE QUATERMASS XPERIMENT, the "X" used to emphasise the adult X-rating the film received on its initial release) was allowed a slightly larger budget and benefited enormously from Nigel Kneale's participation in the screenplay. In this film, at least Brian Donlevy behaves a little more like Quatermass ought to, though I still don't think he was right for the part.

For my money, Quatermass should be a pipe-smoking English boffin with leather patches sewn on the elbows of his jacket. The original character was conceived as a kind of Barnes Wallis type, as portrayed by Michael Redgrave in THE DAM BUSTERS.

The movie is set in a post-war Britain that was a little panicked by the idea of nuclear weapons and even more unsettled by the knowledge that our former allies, The Soviets, had the same weapons and they were pointed at us. This was the climate that gave us Orwell's 1984 and Don Siegel's INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS. Paranoia was out to get us ...

This same atmosphere lasted well into the 1960s and can also be glimpsed in TV shows like THE AVENGERS. This was the era I grew up in, so I speak from personal experience :-)

This movie is one of Hammer's better offerings of the period. Released the same year as CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN, it more than holds its own against the other, better-known Hammer colour offerings. Indeed, it benefits from its monochrome photography, which brilliantly communicates the austerity of the years immediately following WWII.

Thoroughly recommended, this film will appeal to anyone who can get beyond the admittedly primitive 1950s special effects to be rewarded by the rich and clever story that lies beneath the slightly dodgy veneer ...
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent Brit shocker. One of the best in the underrated Quatermass series.
Infofreak27 May 2003
'Quatermass 2' is even better than the excellent 'The Quatermass Xperiment'. Like the first movie it was a remake of the original British TV production which I have sadly not seen (both are lost I think). Val Guest directs once again, Brian Donlevy reprises the role of the crusty Professor Quatermass, and this time Nigel Kneale was allowed to adapt his own original script, which probably explains why it improves on the first movie. Quatermass stumbles across a mysterious secret Government installation which is supposedly developing synthetic food, but is in fact something quite different and frightening. Donlevy isn't my favourite Quatermass but he is better here than in the first movie, and the supporting cast includes John Longden in the role originally played by Jack Warner, Bryan Forbes as Quatermass' assistant Marsh (another change of actor), comedian Sid James of 'Carry On' fame, and Hammer regular Michael Ripper. 'Quatermass 2' is a very entertaining and suspenseful thriller, which hasn't dated as half as much as you'd expect. It will particularly be interesting to fans of 'Invasion Of The Body Snatchers', which it shares certain themes with, and 'The X-Files', which many people, myself included, would argue owes this movie and the next in the series 'Quatermass and the Pit' a large debt. Nigel Kneale is one of the most underrated writers of SF and horror of our time (over 80 years old and still active!), and the Quatermass movies are his best known and enjoyable achievements. I highly recommend them all.
46 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Exciting, Well-Scripted Fifties SF/Horror Hybrid Of Devious And Sinister Alien Invasion
ShootingShark24 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Rocket scientist Professor Quatermass tracks a strange meteor shower to the remote English village of Winnerden Flats. There he find a secret government project lab which appears to be collecting the meteors, but refuses any admittance. What does it all mean ?

This rip-roaring sequel to The Quatermass Xperiment is an ominous, breathless, science-fiction/horror minor classic, primarily due to the top-notch script by Nigel Kneale and Guest, which has been copied many times, particularly by Dr Who. The clandestine aura of the invasion and the who/where-exactly-are-they nature of the aliens is tremendously suspenseful, chilling and even absurd (they have government funding !). Donlevy is one-note in the lead but conveys well his hero's frustration at the conspiracy and disbelief all around him, James is excellent in a rare serious part as the Fleet Street hack (his death is a profoundly shocking moment), and noted director Forbes (Whistle Down The Wind, The Stepford Wives) is interesting as a scientist-turned-zombie. The movie's other trump card is the ultra-creepy setting for the aliens' base; an endless maze of enormous vats, miles of steel piping, scaffolding, control rooms and conduits (it was filmed at the gargantuan Shellhaven Refinery on the north bank of the Thames Estuary); an eerie place which adds immeasurably to the sinister atmosphere. The pace is furious, racing through the premise and the initial investigation then carefully blending in elements of authoritarian coverups, political comment, small town drama, military action and full-blown monster movie. It's an excellent mix of intriguing and intelligent storyline and agreeable adventure, with the next revelation, chase or scare never far away, just the way good cinema should be. One of the great Hammer films, retitled Enemy From Space for the US release, and followed by the equally brilliant Quatermass And The Pit ten years later.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More action-packed than the first, though admittedly inferior
tomgillespie200218 March 2014
After the huge success of The Quatermass Xperiment (1955) - the film that launched Hammer Productions into the mainstream - Hammer and the BBC were quick to greenlight an adaptation of the sequel before the television serial of the same name even aired. Original creator Nigel Kneale was brought back in to pen the early draft, which was later revised by director Val Guest. Kneale's main problem with the first film was the brusque performance of American Brian Donlevy, and was disappointed that he would again reprise his role. But Kneale's criticism's aside, Quatermass 2 is a more action-packed and dramatic effort, although admittedly inferior to the first.

Professor Quatermass (Donlevy) is struggling to get his Moon Project off the ground. His plan is to set up a base on the moon and be the first to successfully colonise it. These plans are interrupted when Quatermass becomes intrigued with various meteorites that have been landing in the area. After travelling with his colleague Marsh (Bryan Forbes) to one of the meteor sites, Marsh is injured as one of the meteorites cracks open and leaves him with a 'V'-shaped burn on his face. Armed guards with similar facial scarring take Marsh to their nearby government facility, leaving Quatermass to contact his old friend Inspector Lomax (John Longden) for advice. This leads him to Vincent Broadhead (Tom Chatto), a member of parliament also investigating the strange going-ons at the site.

Although it was Nigel Kneale's main gripe with the movie adaptations of his creation, Donlevy's (possibly alcohol-fuelled) performance as Quatermass is one of the most intriguing aspects of the Quatermass series. He should be your typical Sherlock Holmes-esque British inquisitor, but Donlevy's interpretation is arrogant, selfish and abrupt, making him one of the more interesting 'heroes' of the genre. Here he is more action star too, dodging machine gun fire and making quick getaways in a film that is much more action-orientated than it's predecessor, although it retains much of it's realism. Due to this, it lacks the slow-build atmosphere of Xperiment, almost losing it completely with the overblown climax full of explosions and gun-fire. Even though it was overshadowed on its release by Hammer's The Curse of Frankenstein (1957), it is still a fun film, and even features of pre- Carry On Sidney James.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The full 1/9d's worth and much more
trimmerb123423 September 2013
In 1957 1 shilling and 9 pence was the price of one of the better seats in a cinema. I was too young to be allowed to see the film at the time of its release and the recent screening on BBC 2 is the first time I've seen it - 50+ years after its release - perhaps the first time it has been screened on British television? Its high rating of 7 and many enthusiastic reviews from the US confirm that it is an important British film of the time with a wide - and lasting - appeal.

The opening is something of a teaser but the pace flags somewhat after that for the first 10 minutes or so then with the revelation of the unlimited seriousness of the problem, the pace gets faster and faster and film more and more gripping.

Not as polished as "Invasion of the Body-Snatchers" but Nigel Kneale's creative ideas and screenplay ensure, not first time, that even nearly 60 years on this is still a rocket ride.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Quatermass... where do I know that name?"
Ali_John_Catterall12 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Rampant paranoia and corruption are the order of the day, as Professor Quatermass is ensnared in a sinister high-level alien conspiracy to take over the world, in this classic sci-fi sequel from Hammer.

After the American head of the British space effort Professor Quatermass (Donlevy) has his moon colonisation project turned down by Whitehall, he is intrigued to discover a virtually identical plant thriving in the secretive, Area 51-style community of Winnerden Flats. Investigating, Quatermass discovers that meteorites, which are falling in the area, have infected locals and plant workers with an alien parasite, turning them into Nazi-like zombies.

Aided by Inspector Lomax (Longden, who ably took over from Jack Warner), MP Broadhead (Chatto), and Sid James' boozy reporter Jimmy Hall ("Drunk, he's clever - sober, he's brilliant!"), Quatermass discovers the supposed "synthetic food" plant is a front for an alien invasion, supported at the highest levels by (zombie-fied) government officials.

As Quatermass testifies, "Inside those domes are thousands of tiny creatures that can join together and expand into things 100 foot high! And each one can infect a human being!" After Broadhead, Hall and two plant workers are killed, the plant is stormed and the aliens therein destroyed.

"It was difficult to believe sometimes, in the 50s, that science was a force for good", says Quatermass creator Nigel Kneale. In this superior sequel, Kneale (now on board as scriptwriter, having freed himself from his BBC contract) explores Cold War themes of scientific outrages and governmental corruption, then coming into vogue, in which 'silence' spelled 'complicity'. (His screenplay was based on his script for the six-part 1955 BBC TV version.) As Winnerden's 'Camp Committee' has it, "Secrets Mean Sealed Lips!" Accordingly, director Val Guest invokes a supreme paranoia throughout, slightly undercut by Donlevy's blustering performance, which grates a little, and the disappointing, if appropriately bizarre, aliens themselves (50s low-budget special effects haven't aged so well).

However, it's more than made up for by another terrifying score from James Bernard, and some judiciously-placed set pieces: Broadhead's grisly demise by black, burning slime; Lomax's horrified realisation that his boss has become a zombie.

Quatermass II has a lovingly packaged DVD (worth buying alongside the original) including a lavish accompanying booklet, containing rare stills and an informative essay by Hammer experts Marcus Hearn and Jonathan Rigby.

Elsewhere, director Val Guest and writer Nigel Kneale wax entertainingly about the making of the picture, having to explain to their US interviewer the meaning of 'Whitehall', revealing Brian Donlevy's love of an afternoon's tipple ("he called it his 'plasma'") and how his toupee once blew off during filming, "circling like a mad bat". Meanwhile, in another specially-filmed interview, Guest acknowledges Kneale's dissatisfaction with Donlevy's casting: "Very bad for him - very good for me!"
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent, Eerie Second "Quatermass" Film
Witchfinder-General-66629 October 2009
"The Quatermass Xperiment" of 1955 was a magnificent milestone of British Sci-Fi Horror, whose success single-handedly boosted the great Hammer Studios' status as Britain's Horror producer No. 1. "Quatermass 2", which was also directed by Val Guest, is a fantastic sequel that even surpasses the original in its suspense, creepiness and macabre premise. Brian Donlevy returns as Professor Bernhard Quatermass, who is, in the meantime, planning to colonize the moon. When he hears about mysterious meteorite showers in the countryside, his investigations lead him to a colony that resembles his own plans for the moon colonization...

I do not want to give too much away, but fans of "The Quatermass Xperiment" can be assured to love this. The film shares the ingenuity of its predecessor, but even surpasses it in plot, atmosphere and suspense. The film follows an ingenious, macabre premise, and the ideas are executed in an awesome manner. The script to this sequel was written by the original inventor of "Quatermass" and writer of the foregoing BBC-series, British Sci-Fi genius Nigel Kneale. The storyline is very intriguing and throws some intelligent political and social aspects in the generally very eerie Sci-Fi Horror film. The effects are very good, and while the film also has its slower parts, there is quite a lot of action. Brian Donlevy is once again great as the eponymous Professor Quatermass. The husky, pencil-mustached Donlevy, who mainly played tough guys in his earlier roles, doesn't seem much like a scientist, but rather like a hard-boiled detective. However, I find him to be awesome in the role of this, rather unorthodox professor. Overall, "Quatermass 2" is a true must-see for Horror/Sci-Fi fans in general and Hammer fans in particular (As are the 1955 original and the, even superior, 1967 sequel "Quatermass and the Pit". The "Quatermass" franchise is regarded by some as the absolute highlight of Hammer's legacy; personally, I still prefer their greatest Gothic Horror films, such as (most parts of) the "Frankenstein" and "Dracula" series, "Twins of Evil" or "Vampire Circus" (my personal favorite). It is undeniable though that the "Quatermass" films are milestones and absolute must-sees for everyone interested in Sci-Fi and Horror cinema.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Boy! Do I Remember This One!
worldsofdarkblue28 June 2006
I was never aware that this movie was anything other than a stand-alone feature. I'm not familiar with 'Quatermass' in any way whatsoever. But I saw a movie when I was a kid that was titled 'Enemy From Space' and I've never forgotten it. The scene where a man who has been covered in some black stuff shockingly, jarringly shrieks out and stumbles down the outside stairway of some huge, weird, vat-like structure frightened me enormously. I didn't know what the stuff was exactly, I just knew it was burning the man horribly and his utterly convincing screams drove it into my brain permanently.

I was pretty young when I saw it at my local 'B-Movies Only' neighborhood theater. I'm not sure how it was elsewhere, but in my hometown there was a movie house that got all the A-List pictures (Cary Grant, James Stewart, Liz Taylor, Disney) and another that made the most of the plentiful supply of small-budget monster movies that were released in the late fifties and very early sixties. Triple Features were often offered in these 'lesser' venues. The beauty of it was that both types of theater thrived in those cable-less, vcr-less days. But I digress.

So I see this movie and I'm only about 7 years old at the time and that night I couldn't sleep. And though I had sat through the entire thing, my mind was locked into that horrifying scene so completely that I did not really recall another word spoken in the film. It came around to the Biltmore a couple more times and, though terrified, I was irresistibly drawn to see it again, each time absorbing a little more of the content. The challenging storyline wasn't all that easy to grasp - a lot of it went over my young head.

It was a long time ago but I remember a meteorite falling through a roof, a road that went nowhere, a silent and sinister industrial area, a man who becomes suddenly very sick (in the pub I think) and has a white splotch on his face, severely serious soldiers who seem to be bad guys, a window through which an alien something-or-other is observed and, of course, the unfortunate man covered in burning black oil.

A truly eerie movie, as engrossing as it is chilling. I would very much like to see it again
45 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It surprises positively within its genre, just like its predecessor.
Boba_Fett113815 November 2009
Just like its predecessor, this is a movie that surprises within its genre. '50's science-fiction/horror wasn't exactly known for its class or greatness but some of the exception from the '50's to this were also some great classic ones at the same time. Just think about "The Day the Earth Stood Still" and "The Thing From Another World" for instance. What those movies all did was taking its genre serious and approach it from a scientific and also more classic horror approach. So instead of having straight forward monsters we have an actual build-up, with solid written story and characters to like and feel for.

"Quatermass 2" is also a movie that approaches the genre with some more class than many of its fellow genre pieces from the same time period. It's a movie that mostly relies on its mysterious build up and eerie atmosphere. It has some great moments in, though it also is being quite ridicules at times. But this also has to do with the fact that of course by todays standards the '50's science-fiction flicks look all so terribly outdated now days.

It's an Hammer film from the period that the Hammer studios were not only solely known for its horror productions. The movie also does have some of the, what later would be, typical Hammer film moments in it. Basically Hammer films were all some early exploitation flicks but in its beginning period it still showed some more class and also had some obviously more serious intentions still with its movies.

The acting in the movie is really great. Brian Donlevy reprises his Dr. Quatermass role again and he was great to watch again. The role of Lomax is this time being played by John Longden, who also did a real great job.

It's a good looking movie with its atmosphere. The movie is shot in black & white, which enhances the mystery and also tension of the entire movie. It's a movie that really is build on its atmosphere and mystery. It does use some special effects but it does this to a minimum. It's really not the type of science-fiction movie you would expect from one that got made during the '50's.

Just like its predecessor, a great little '50's gem.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best SF Film I Have Seen. The Best Horror Film I Have Seen
loza-124 May 2005
One has to see this film in the context of when it was made. Britain was in the grip of science fever at the time. There were heavily attended science fairs all over the country; the space race was under starter's orders; and many people (even some scientists) still harboured the idea that there was intelligent life in the solar system.

A man of the times was the character of Prof Bernard Quatermass played by Brian Donlevy. He was the new breed of scientific hero: tough talking, hard-headed, as good with his fists as he was with his integral calculus, wilful, and armed with a can of bullshit repellent. At the time, it was thought that the scientists were going to solve all the world's problems; and Prof Quatermass was the British embodiment of this notion.

The Shell refinery setting is superb for one of the most frightening SF stories you are ever going to come across. It is not the aliens which are so frightening as the reactions of the authorities, and the lengths they will go to, to cover the whole thing up. Note that some of the uniforms worn by the authorities are even more frightening than the aliens in the domes.

It is not often that a sequel is better than the original; but this is such a case. The Quatermass Experiment is fine; but this one is much, much better.

It's still good. It could have been made only a couple of weeks ago.
37 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quatermass 2
henry8-313 March 2022
Brian Donlevy returns as the titular scientist, this time investigating the population of a isolated modern town working on a huge plant that ostensibly contains a new food. Further investigation though suggests something not of this world exists deep within the huge domes at the plant.

Although slightly plagued again by a low budget for a big budget story and the continuing strange casting of Donlevy as a complete misery of a central character, this still remains an inventive, intelligent piece of British sci-fi with a good solid story, some really exciting scenes and some genuine unpleasantness. Great late night entertainment.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
They may have elaborate Invasion Plans, but we have the Luck of the Irish!
davejones18 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I can't believe people giving this movie scores of 8 and 9 out of 10.

The worst thing about this film is its script, which blunders from one completely unsubstantiated assumption to the next on the part of our protagonist in constructing its slapdash story. But also pretty terrible is its heavy reliance on coincidence for the good guys to succeed in their quest--namely to thwart an invasion of the Earth by an alien landing force.

There are so many points in the story where dumb luck--for example, having an experimental rocket in danger of destroying itself in a nuclear detonation warmed up and ready to fire on the launch pad--works in our heroes' favour. There's very little they actually plan and execute to win the day.

Fortunately for us, the aliens are completely incompetent at 1) shooting guns and 2) maintaining any kind of perimeter on their own base.

Also lucky for us is a mob of drunken St. Patrick's Day revelers who spring into action in defense of our planet.

I'll admit that this film does have a certain air of paranoia that reminded me of of the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers, but it isn't a patch on that classic. Its occasionally spooky atmosphere doesn't come anywhere close to making up for its failures in storytelling and weak production values.

I wouldn't waste my time.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DISTURBING CLASSIC OF 50"s SCIENCE-FICTION
danr5127 January 2000
This was one of the first of its kind; a subtlety scary vision of a secret alien takeover. X-FILES may owe a debt to this low-budget, but nevertheless effective film of the powers-that-be who are conspiring with the invaders, and one lone, determined scientist who accidentally uncovers the sinister plot.

QUATERMASS II (U.S. title: ENEMY FROM SPACE) was produced before INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, the film it is often compared to, due to their thematic similarities (loss of identity, social oppression, dangers of conformity, and blind allegiance to a greatly questionable, authoritarian power). However, it was released in the U.S. shortly after BODY SNATCHERS, probably making it look like a copycat to some.

Superb writer Nigel Kneale (excellent script, highly original for its time, derived from the earlier BBC serial) was known to strongly despise Brian Donleavy's gruff performance as the lead character. Kneale did not like the fact that Donleavy presented the character as a cold, methodical misanthrope who treats his colleagues like expendable underlings. He will probably want to boil me in oil for saying this, but I felt that presenting the lead character as morally ambivalent and ethically questionable jettisoned the standard 50's scientist/hero sterotype (for once he is not nice and charming). It also added a further degree of tension to the well-plotted story. In many ways, his alienated character is somewhat alien; perhaps that's the only true way to resist social pressures and conditioning. The allegory here is strong.

As the story opens, Quatermass is driving one night on a remote country road. He is furious that the stodgy Whitehall bureaucrats rejected his funding request for a proposed moon colonization project. A speeding car nearly hits him head-on as it runs off the road. The shaken passengers are a frightened woman and her boyfriend, who is in a crazed state, and has a strange black mark on his face.

Quatermass returns to his isolated lab, where radar reveals to his assistants that many small meteor particles (at least that's what they assume they are) have descended over a rural village known as Wynerton Flats.

Going out there with his colleague, Marsh, they first discover his moon project, fully constructed, and some small, mysterious rocks. As Marsh examines one, it emits an eerie gas and pops in his face, leaving the weird black mark. Strange soldiers arrive, behaving like aloof zombies, abduct Marsh, strong-arm Quatermass in the typical fascist tradition, and order him to leave. (There may be one flaw here: Why didn't the "soldiers" either abduct or kill Quatermass, instead of letting him go, so he can inform?)

Naturally the authorities all have tight lips about the secret activities at Wynerton Flats, but Quatermass manages to convince a few officials to go out there with him. A government aid (with that strange black mark on his wrist) conducts a formal tour of the plant, where everything seems to be normal. Not so. The small group is indoctrinated by the zombies (who resemble Nazis), but Quatermass manages to escape.

(This scene truly exposes Donleavy's ruthless side: He and a woman are taken into a large dome, but Quatermass flees, leaving the woman behind, without any concern for her fate. Hell, he doesn't even abide by the old fifties hero tradition by risking his life to save the distressed damsel. In many ways Quatermass was an ahead-of-his-time anti-hero. I always felt that this added a disquieting strength to the drama and the severity of the dire situation, but I guess that Kneale will still vehemently disagree).

I'll stop here, but don't worry, the worse is still to come. The sense of growing unease and mounting terror (strong qualities of your finer British Science Fiction at that time) escalates. Be patient, for it does carefully build into a total state of alarm, as Quatermass and the local angered citizens challenge the invaders (who have taken over most of the government and military officials) to a brutal showdown. There is something highly menacing in those domes.

This impressive film is true Science Fiction at its best. It thrills without pandering and is thoughtful to the point of disturbing. You can't trust anyone. Its social and political implications are definitely troubling. This is not for your Lucas and Spielberg crowd, for we're not talking about commercial catering to eight-year-olds. Val Guest directs in a cold, cynical Kubrickian manner, accentuating the high degree of paranoia, and the picture's black & white photography conveys a bleak, creepy mood. (Sorry, no pretty pictures here). The intriguing story takes on true nightmarish proportions.

The few effects won't win any CGI awards (don't forget, computers weren't around then) but the briefly glimpsed monster (in the gothic Lovecraft tradition) is quite sickening. After all, it can manipulate man's dirty politics, you can't get more reprehensible than that.

From the late sixties to the late eighties this film was unavailable to the public, and it was feared to be permanently lost, but it later was released on video and shown occasionally on the Science Fiction Channel. Many notable Science Fiction and Horror authors (I believe that Harlan Ellison and Stephen King were among them) have championed this small, but remarkable early Hammer production. This is the film that many others have "borrowed from." Just a polite way of saying RIPPED-OFF!

For those seeking an intelligent challenge, check it out.
45 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Early Doctor Who-style outing
Leofwine_draca8 December 2013
While it comes across as a British spin on INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, what QUATERMASS 2 most brings to mind is an old, Pertwee-era episode of DOCTOR WHO; I'm thinking something like The Green Death, perhaps. There are too many similarities to be purely coincidental: a remote, scientific institution hiding dark secrets; faceless guards under the influence of some malign influence; unfriendly villagers; cheesy special effects; the dedicated scientist hero and his various companions. It goes without saying that if you're a DOCTOR WHO fan then you'll love this.

I saw THE QUATERMASS XPERIMENT some years ago and I remember it feeling very different to this movie. It was smaller scale, more homely, more intimate. QUATERMASS 2 feels more like it's trying to be an American movie, with stuff taking place on a much larger scale. The conspiracy storyline is very hackneyed these days but it's handled with wit and decent pacing here and as a whole this is a nice early outing for the newly-horrifying Hammer, even it is the lesser vehicle to both the first film and X THE UNKNOWN. The film is notable for Brian Donlevy's gruff, hard-headed turn as Quatermass and for the appearance of many familiar British supporting players, including Percy Herbert, Charles Lloyd Pack and Michael Ripper. There's also a decent, semi-serious role for Sid James to sink his teeth into, too!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine sequel to Quatermass experiment about an Alien invasion attempting to destroy Earth
ma-cortes29 September 2010
This classic British production with interesting and challenging premise contains forthright performance , original argument and tense filmmaking .Vintage British sci-fi movie with a fascinating Brian Donlevy as Quatermass , a rocket scientist from original BBC production that kept millions glued to their TV screens in a serial formed by six episodes of 30 minutes starred by John Robertson and directed by Rudolph Cartier . This well intentioned Sc-Fi but also realistic picture concerns about the events occur when some meteors fall on the English countryside . Later on , Professor Quatermass , who is angry when his schemes for a moon colony are quashed, fights brainwashes zombies to rescue unfortunates whose bodies have been invaded by aliens . But then , scary and risked deeds begin to happen culminating in a threat to the entire world . As a giant blob and some aliens bring abominable terror carrying an infestation from outer space from destroying Earth . Furthermore, various government officials are possessed by a strange malignant force . Not long after a terrible thing stalks the fabric . The plot is developed for continuous discovery leading a spooky and astounding finale set at a refinery. This chiller is an outstanding adaptation of TV serial exhibited in BBC (1953) by Nigel Kneagle . An elderly and bleak Brian Donlevy is very good as rough Quatermass, he gives a tremendously powerful acting as rough scientist .The great climax film is ,of course, the ending confrontation between the protagonists and the weird entity.

This suspenseful and tense flick with just adequate effects is influenced by a story titled ¨The meteor¨ by Ray Bradbury and the movie ¨It came from outer space (1953)¨ by Jack Arnold . It's a eerie story, unusual in the strong character it builds for the elderly Donlevy . As turns up the Irish Brian Donlevy as starring who repeats role in ¨Quatermass I¨ both directed by Val Guest, the third part is titled ¨Quatermass and the pit¨, this is one of the best science fiction films of the history with Andrew Keir and directed by Roy Ward Baker ; besides John Mills starred the final chapter titled the ¨Conclusion Quatermass¨ , a lesser effort , directed by Piers Haggard . In the picture appears the usual Hammer technicians, as cameraman Elder Willis creating a riveting cinematography ; Les Bowie who makes some competent special effects , sensational makeup by Philip Leakey ; an awesome production design and musical conductor by James Bernard composing a tense and thrilling score . Hammer Film , later known for their high-quality horror films, wishes to acknowledge with thanks the facilities extended to them by ¨Shell¨ Refining and Marketing Company for the shooting and many scenes at Shell Haven Refinery , Essex where was mostly filmed . The pic gets acceptable budget of 92.000 pounds financed 75 per cent by United Artists and remaining Hammer Films. This successful movie owes a lot to prestigious artist and technician team that encouraged its studio Hammer to continue to become Europe's foremost purveyor of terror and mystery . This well developed , nail-biting film is well produced by Anthony Hinds and compellingly directed by Val Guest who increases the pace and the suspense as the movie heads for its eerie ending . The flick will appeal to science fiction movies enthusiasts and Hammer fans .Rating : Above average and well worth watching . Sci-Fi fans should like it , essential and indispensable seeing .
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great British sci fi
davidnewell-119 October 2020
Quatermass 2 is another classic Not as good as the 1st film but good.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fine sequel.
punishmentpark2 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This sequel to 'The Quatermass experiment' has a few details in common with it (professor Quatermass and evil aliens), but that's about it. Here, an important location was provided by oil company Shell, so don't look surprised if the monsters turn out to be looking like giant mobile oil-spills.

The story is very doable, the atmosphere and locations are pretty nice once again, and there are plenty of not so much scary, but certainly fun enough monsters. This one does lack a character like Victor Carroon, but I suppose you can't always have it all.

A good 7 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Quatermass Returns.
AaronCapenBanner20 November 2013
Director Val Guest and actor Brian Donlevy returned for this sequel. Bernard Quatermmass has a plan to build a moon colony, but is called upon to investigate the mysterious landing of meteorites in the English countryside, near a village. He is startled to discover that a factory has been built nearby, where most of the villagers work, that is heavily guarded. He is told that it produces synthetic food, but comes to learn that it is really controlled by alien invaders who plan on world conquest. How can he and Inspector Lomax(now played by John Longden) stop this insidious plan? Worthy sequel with some violent and intense scenes, though the miscasting of the too-abrasive Brian Donlevy is again a big detriment. Too bad Patrick Troughton wasn't cast in this(and the first) instead!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Terrific British Science Fiction from the 1950's!!!
cshep20 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Bernard Quatermass(Brian Donlevy) , scientist and explorer wants to build a Moon Base, hey, it's the 1950's, but no one else has any interest, why, well some one else already built it and is bringing down alien life, inside meteorites, and storing them in big domes !!! Savvy ? Well, there you go...

Quatermass stumbles onto the scheme and discovers the life forms that inhabit the dome !!! Everyone who comes into contact with the creatures, becomes a mind slave and must follow the leader ? Sound like Totalitanarianism ? Yep....But, the bearer is left with a mark, making it easy for the viewer and screen person, to detect the infected !!! Val Guest does a Superb direction of this Nigel Kneale story, written and shown on British Television in 6 installments. Shown in the U.S theatres as Quatermass II: Enemy from Space !!! Better than the first Quatermass which lacked a satisfying conclusion . Donlevy repeats his role of Bernard Quatermass with succinct approval !! Quaint, abrupt, never boring, somewhat one-dimensional, but always interesting and vibrant, Donlevy is appealing and perfect for the part as this irritating scientist, who has an unquenched thirst for knowledge and adventure !!! Terrific production values, they literally mad a very interesting story from Nothing !!! Would you believe the Shell Refinery as a Moon Base ? Yep, and it looks Great !!!

Take a Look !!! Quatermass II !!! Great Musical Score by James Bernard keeps the Suspense driving !!!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tense and intelligent Brit sf thriller that influenced "X-Files
mcnpauls27 February 2002
A superb script by unsung genius Nigel Kneale; very good direction by Val Guest; atmospheric photography; eerie music; several very good acting performances. The only drawbacks are that Brian Donlevy is awful as Quatermass and the special effects at times look a bit laughable.

Most intriguing of all is just how similar "The X_Files" is to this. There are various sites on the internet claiming that the creators of "Files" plagiarised this (and other Nigel Kneale films/TV series).

You can certainly see many remarkable coincidences.

Overall, a highly enjoyable, thought-provoking and influential film.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than The Experiment, but not as great as The Pit
The_Void8 July 2005
I'm a huge fan of Hammer Horror's Quatermass and the Pit, but in spite of that; I didn't like the earlier film, The Quatermass Experiment, very much. That film didn't have the same boldness that the later one did, and I found it rather flat. While this sequel is better than the original film, I'm still not a massive fan of it and it never comes anywhere near to the sixties Hammer masterpiece. The film's major problem is that the action plays out too slowly, and while some people will admire this plotting as it will allow them to get into the story: I didn't, and all it succeeded in doing for me was turning me off. The reason I didn't enjoy the slow pace much is because the film doesn't give you much to chew on while the story is simmering. The British dialogue and style is nice, but on the whole the atmosphere isn't intriguing or horrific enough for the story. Furthermore, Brian Donlevy, like with the first film, isn't camp enough to play such an eccentric character; and all he does really is show how great Andrew Kier was in the role in Quatermass and the Pit.

The plot follows Quatermass' plan to colonise the moon. After these plans are turned down, the man discovers a strange base in the countryside, which looks exactly like the plans for his moon plot. After investigating this place, it soon becomes apparent to the scientist that something funny is afoot and so he sets out to investigate. I've already spent time concentrating on the film's bad points, so for now for words about the good. Firstly, the plot is very good. While, as mentioned, the execution didn't interest me all the much; the backbone does, and director Val Guest has managed to tie some very interesting sequences into this plot. Seeing Sid James was a surprise, as I didn't know he was in it, and his performance here shows why he was such a success in the 'Carry on' films. Even in a serious film, Sid James is funny. One of the major things I love about Hammer is the style - which this film has, but what it doesn't have is colour. Hammer's colour scheme is an important part of their movies for me; and as this film is in black and white, it doesn't deliver on that front. On the whole, I don't rate this as a resounding success; but people who enjoy 50's monster movies will have a good time, and the film is worth watching anyway just for the monsters at the end!
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Moon project
Prismark108 June 2015
Hammer Films remake the BBC television serial Quatermass 2 and this time Nigel Kneale adapts his own original story.

Brian Donlevy who seemed too much like a tough guy than scientist in the original film reprises his role again. Here he is more softer, slightly more academic but still comes across as an action anti- hero.

Professor Quatermass finds a secret Government base which is producing synthetic food but there seems to be something more sinister involved that could involve aliens and there is a government conspiracy to keep it all hushed up.

I like the fact the he manages to zip up and down from London to Carlisle like it was a matter of minutes away rather than 4-5 hours on the motorway and there was no motorway at the time.

There is a good supporting cast involved in this film with Bryan Forbes, William Franklyn and Sid James. Vera Day provides some sauciness.

Its a little bit dated, although still spooky here and there. Its also a bit schlocky and some of the acting is on the hammy side. The character who gets blackened at the industrial plant and then carefully comes down the ladder is on the silly side.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrifying Sci Fi Atmospheric Classic
m_sabrettes28 May 2000
Val Guest's Quatermass II is my favourite film ever. The cold, dawning revelation that builds up all the way through the first half of the film that the invasion is actually underway and that the 'zombies' not only WALK AMONG US, but are actually IN CHARGE and IN POWER is terrifyingly atmospheric. I always like to think that if the invasion ever did come, it wouldn't come through massive mother ships as per Independence Day, but from within, from the suburbs, the rural villages. Really clever invaders would use Earth's own power structures, governments and resources against it without anyone noticing, not turn up en masse in flying saucers spoiling for a fight. The idea of the invasion falling to Earth in meteorites through a form of collective intelligence (recycled in the 1973 BBC Doctor Who serial Spearhead From Space) continues this threatening vein of invasion, and provides the most atmospheric scene in the film when Quatermass stands in the open night air as whizzing sounds around him give away the increased number of the meteorites now falling (the invasion is now fully underway!). Other scenes are just downright terrifying and follow the Kneale tradition of 'terror through revelation': the lorries in London carrying the symbol; Quatermass' first glimpse through the dome viewing panel; and when it is revealed how the zombies are blocking the pipes!! This 'revelation' aspect can be seen in all of the Quatermass films and serials (in The Quatermass Conclusion: when it is revealed by the body parts that the hippies weren't 'transported', in Quatermass and the Pit: 'you mean WE are the Martians!!'). Storytelling, atmosphere and terror like this hasn't survived the onset of today's special effects. Film makers like Dean Devlin just don't need to employ methods like this anymore, and this is why thinking people's science fiction relying on chilling, atmospheric and scientifically valid stories, plots and concepts will never ever be repeated.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed