Windom's Way (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Well-Made But Not Very Involving
JamesHitchcock1 May 2015
"The Nun's Story", in which he played a Belgian doctor working in the Congo, provided Peter Finch with one of his best-known roles. Two years earlier, however, Finch had also starred in a much less well-known film in which he also played a European doctor working in a Third World country, in this case Malaya (as it then was), shortly after independence.

There are two main strands to the plot. One concerns the efforts of Finch's character, Dr Alec Windom, to mediate in the dispute between the local Malay rubber-tappers and their employers, a British company. The dispute has arisen out of the tappers' wish to grow their own rice, something which the company (who regard rice as their own monopoly) object to. Windom's instincts are to sympathise with the tappers, especially as the local company manager, Patterson refuses to entertain any idea of compromise and has no compunction about calling in the local police, whose methods of upholding law and order can be brutal, to deal with any unrest. Things become more complicated, however, when some of the workers defect to a local guerrilla group who are in revolt against the government. An additional complication arises from the fact that one of the guerrillas is the brother of Windom's chief nurse.

The guerrillas are clearly based upon the Malayan communists who fought both the British colonial regime and then the independent Malayan government. The word "communist", however, is never used- they are simply referred to as "rebels"- possibly because the real Malayan communists were dominated by ethnic Chinese and attracted little support from ethnic Malays.

The other strand deals with relations between Windom and his wife Lee. The two are estranged, but at the beginning of the film she has unexpectedly turned up in Malaya hoping for a reconciliation. We do not see anything of their life together in Britain, but from what we hear it would appear that one of the causes of their estrangement was Lee's attempts to interfere with her husband's career and her insistence that he should apply for what she was as socially prestigious positions. There is an implication that Windom moved to Malaya after the breakdown of his marriage precisely because he believed- obviously incorrectly- that Lee would not attempt to follow him there.

"Windom's Way" was made by the well-known director Ronald Neame, later to be responsible for films like "The Chalk Garden" and "The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie". I would not rank it quite as highly as either of those films, and in terms of quality it is in nothing like the same class as "The Nun's Story", but then that would perhaps be an unfair comparison as, despite the presence of Finch in similar roles, they are quite different in style and purpose. Here, Windom is the main character whereas Finch's character in "The Nun's Story", although important, is a supporting role who only appears in the second of the film's three acts. The main concentration in that film is on the spiritual development of Audrey Hepburn's character Gabrielle.

In this film, by contrast, the concentration is on Malayan politics- a subject of perhaps less import to a British audience today than it would have been in 1957- and on the relationship between Windom and Lee. This does not hold any real surprises- we know they will end up back together- and the film as a whole, while well-made, is not very involving. 6/10
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Innocence Abroad
Igenlode Wordsmith23 May 2005
This is an intelligent film about an innocent -- perhaps naive -- man and village community caught up on the edge of national turmoil, and it avoids both obvious political cliché and easy answers. Into its widening canvas, from individual to village to province to ultimate future of a nation, it also weaves a tentative attempt at reconciliation between the eponymous English doctor and his ambitious ex-social butterfly of a wife: both have an alternative romance mutely on offer, although nothing is ever explicitly stated, and the broken marriage is on shaky ground at best.

So far so good -- personal and political combine, as they have done since 'Gone with the Wind', though with the political for once taking the leading role. There are beautiful location shots, some very effective action sequences, especially in the crowd scenes, good use of background music, skilfully understated dialogue that avoids the need for open exposition, and an unexpected humanity and depth in the treatment of all the characters. Ultimately, however, I found it curiously unsatisfying as a drama: I have a depressing suspicion that for all their merits, the equivocal realism and avoidance of the emotional broad brush seen here perhaps deprive the film of some of the force of pure entertainment.

We are enlisted in the conflict, drawn to take sides, tossed pawn-like in unsuspected undercurrents and then cast out, bruised and numb, to effectively wash our hands of the whole affair. It reflects the genuine messiness of real life, but it's not catharsis; this has more of a documentary feel. It's a well-made film, and held me riveted while it ran, but after the end credits I was somehow left feeling 'Is that it?'
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The natives are revolting
MOscarbradley3 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The natives are revolting in this Malysian-set drama that finds Peter Finch's liberal doctor battling with his conscience, (he favors the natives over the imperialists who are exploiting them but doesn't have much truck with the murdering rebels either), and trying, at the same time, to save his marriage to beautiful, addle-headed Mary Ure. Ure oscillates between being a pillar of strength one minute and almost total naiveté the next. (Her actions don't auger well for pretty nurse Natasha Parry but then she is there when needed to get her husband out of a tight spot).

Actually this fifties-made British movie isn't at all bad. It's exciting and not as cut-and-dried nor as black-and-white as other films of its kind: you can appreciate Finch's dilemma. Performances, too, are fine. Finch and Ure are excellent and there are surprisingly good supporting turns from the likes of Marne Maitland, Gregoire Aslan and Robert Flemying. No classic then but it would have made for an enjoyable night out in its day.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"...do you expect us to greet the troops with cake and wine...?...."
Brucey_D10 December 2018
Windom (Finch) is a doctor who is passionate about the welfare of people, saving lives and much less interested in social climbing. This may be the reason he left his estranged socialite wife Lee (Ure) back in the UK and went to Malaya. However she comes to Malaya for one last chance at reconciliation with him; their personal drama is played out at the same time as Malaya is in the midst of an 'emergency', teetering on the brink of revolt and civil war.

Finch's combination of an impassioned nature and a stiff upper lip is put to good use here; he and luminous beauty Ure do look like a mismatched couple in many respects. Their troubled and mismatched relationship is perhaps paralleled by the troubled and mismatched relationship between the government, the rubber business, and the people in that part of the world.

Much of the film was shot in Pinewood, with location filming done on Corsica; look in the background and you can see the hills are arid and practically barren, even if there are palm trees and verdant undergrowth placed in the foreground.

Every time I see Ure onscreen, I can't help but be reminded of her untimely death; she was only 42 when she passed away. Here she could have been little more than going through the motions but she does more than that. The rest of the cast is well chosen too; from Michael Hornden's uncaring plantation manager to Aslan's official.

Arguably this isn't an action film, it isn't a drama, and it isn't a political sounding board. However it does contain elements of all three. Today it perhaps serves best as a period piece; a snapshot of how goings on in the colonies were portrayed at the time.

If you see this film today the chances are that you are looking at a video transfer of mediocre quality, taken from a second or third generation print that has itself been well-used. It doesn't really do the camerawork, locations etc justice and a better restoration/transfer would be most welcome.

This is also Burt Kwouk's first (uncredited) appearance on celluloid.

This film is well worth watching and as period piece it gets 7/10 from me.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
hard to watch,some good performances
ib011f9545i10 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I love British films,I am British after all.

I have seen this film before,ages ago on tv.

I remember liking the film but god watching it again was painful.

The film is set in Malaya (now Malaysia) a British colony when the film was made in 1957.

The background to the story would have been well known to cinema goers in 1957/1958.

But in case you don't know from 1948-1960 Malaya endured a communist led uprising.

The communists lost because of a well organised government response but also because they were Chinese and most residents in Malaya are Malay.

End of history lesson.

The film is not very dramatic and does not try to cover the complications of the conflict.

The British and Malay rulers won because they used brains as well as brawn.

The film looks beautiful and Peter Finch is impressive as the doctor who is a local hero but the film is dated and unconvincing.

There are several examples of white actors playing natives,hard to take seriously nowadays.

The 7th Dawn is a much better film on the same subject.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rubber and rice.
mark.waltz11 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It's the good doctor fighting for what's right as opposed to loyalty to his fellow countrymen, the British in control of rubber plants in Malaya in spite of the fact that Malaya has just achieved its own independence. Peter Finch, who appeared in many movies with exotic settings, is desperate to aide the people of Malaya in their desire to build their own rice fields, finding obstacles in the presence of rubber plant owner Michael Horden who is determined to control all the industry in the area which leads to rebellion. If that isn't enough for Finch to deal with before he becomes as mad as hell and can't take it anymore, he also has to face the return of his estranged wife Mary Ure who wants him back, but on her own terms, which seems to indicate the desire to get him away from his practice and his desire to help the struggling native Malayans rather focus on their marriage.

As usual in these exotic films, there's a feisty native little boy who's latched on to the leading white character, adding comedy and pathos, and stealing every scene that he's in. There's no exotic jungle setting or wildlife, just the political upheaval erupting because of the control of outsiders taking away the natives rights and freedom to live their way. Finch and Ure give good performances, and Horden is a great heavy, with additional memorable performances by Robert Flemyng and Grégoire Aslan, playing a very smarmy character. The colorful photography is a benefit, but the pacing is sadly slow and the story not really strong. It's certainly watchable, but far from a British classic in spite of the talent involved, including the legendary director Ronald Neame.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Windom's Way
CinemaSerf12 November 2022
Peter Finch is the eponymous doctor who, along with his estranged wife "Lee" (Mary Ure), is trying to make a go of his practice - and of their failing marriage - at a remote rubber plantation. He is a decent man who wants to improve the lot of the locals and that puts him at odds with the local employer "Patterson" (Michael Hordern) who rules the roost with little sympathy for his workforce. At the end of their tether, they organise a strike which gets out of control with tragic results. With "Patterson" gone seeking help from the authorities, it falls to "Windom" to try and avoid a full scale battle between the locals and the soon-to-arrive police. Finch manages to inject a little intensity to his performance, but the writing and the rest of the cast rather let it all down as does the lacklustre pace of the first half hour of the film. The narrative touches on the growing post-war insurgencies, across what was then the British Empire, amongst populations determined to make their own way - their desire to grow their own rice being emblematic of that stance here - and I suppose that would have resonated better in 1957, but looking at it now it is a rather light-weight melodramatic adventure film that I can't think I will ever watch again.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
My brief review of the film
sol-30 November 2005
A downbeat and joyless drama, the film's politics are dull, but there some strong themes running throughout, and there is also a strong central drama concerning a marriage between persons with opposite views of life and the world. It is a shame that there is not more time dedicated to Finch and Ure's interactions, because the side of the film dealing with politics and the lives of locals just is not handled too well. The lack of background and setting detail is no help, but this side of the film simply fails to do more than what merely is adequate, and it is done in a manner so dreary that it is hard to swallow. Overall the film is okay viewing, but it had the potential to be more. Finch and Ure have some strong moments together but definitely not enough.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Windom has it his way.
ulicknormanowen25 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A gripping story ,very well acted , with a great sense of exoticism and beautiful colors .

Peter Finch ,in a part of a devoted doctor (he would have a similar role in "the nun's story" ,two years later) shines all along the way : his commitment to his work is extraordinary but he has a tendency to side with the rebels such as his protégé ,Jan .In Malaya , the humble natives are exploited by a rubber planter : the opportunity of growing rice may give them independence and may end starvation; although Jan tells Windom that you, occident people, have your factories,universities,and great things,as for us, rice represents our wealth , it's only a symbol : in fact,they want to free themselves from the hold colonialism has over them.

The movie has a remarkable progression; after the death of the "wise old man" , the escalation of violence knows no bounds ,as the high and the mighty call the army ( the soldiers are the agitators' compatriots though ). Mary Ure's character may seem pointless and trite in the first part of the movie: the former socialite trying to pick up the pieces with her husband whose work took the best of him; and to the viewer's eyes ,she 's nothing but decorative ;but further acquaintance shows a determined woman ,whose first attempt (as a nurse ) is self-conscious ,but who plays a prominent part in the final scenes. Avoiding the de rigueur happy end , the screenplay shows that war has only begun. And the husband/wife roles are reversed.

Ronald Neame's directing is efficient ,with a good sense of space;I'd like to recommend another movie of his,the excellent "the prime of Miss Jean Brodie"( 1968) with creme de la creme actress Dame Maggie Smith.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed