Battle Flame (1959) Poster

(1959)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
OK War Film
jamesbwill3 November 2010
This movie is not bad as long as you don't expect much. It was obviously shot on a very limited budget and was mainly done indoors with a lot of backdrops to make it look like the scenes are taking place in Korea during both the summer and winter.

The battle scenes have very little action involving the actors. Much of it is actual newsreel footage shot during WW II and The Korean War. There is so much newsreel stuff that it looks like the filmmakers were trying to flesh out the movie to make it long enough.

Scott Brady speaks his lines as though he were reading them from cue cards. Elaine Edwards gives a very wooden performance with little or no emotion at all. The best acting is done by Robert Blake, who is very good as one of the platoon members. He definitely makes the viewer take notice every time he appears in a scene.

The plot is an unusual one for a Korean War movie, with the U.S. Marines trying to rescue five Navy nurses taken prisoner by the Chinese. The senior nurse (Edwards) is the former lover of the Marine commanding officer (Brady) and that adds spice to the story. Part of this movie's problem is that all that newsreel footage gets in the way of the plot.

As long as the viewer does not require excellent production values and great acting, Battle Flame is an OK little Korean War film that can be enjoyed for its 78 minutes in black and white.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Forgettable and bland war drama
searchanddestroy-129 September 2022
The kind of film that will be erased from my memory in a few minutes. Nothing exceptional here, it is destined to theaters and double feature program, and for movie buffs interested in this period, early sixties or late fifties, or simply war yarns die hard fans, maybe is it worth? You have the young Robert Blake, Scott Brady and a couple of other grade B pictures figures. We have seen this scheme one thousand times, and Korea war has inspired many films, great source of inspiration. But besides PORK CHOP HILL or MEN IN WAR, maybe a handful of others, it is question of ordinary features to entertain war movies buffs. Nothing more. RG Springsteen is however a director whose films are always on my list. By principle.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A tired old structure loses heat and creates heat from dry ice, not from fire
mark.waltz24 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This action film set during the Korean war was filmed on an abviously low budget and focuses more on carnage than character. There are attempts to create some interesting characters, but they end up being more cliches, archetypes rather than flesh and blood living people. There's the officer with romantic issues who discovers as he goes onto the battlefront that the nurse he loves has been involved with someone else long before they met, fights between soldiers over issues of nonsense, the various wounded who express their desires or last wishes in maudlin scenes that succeed in desperation while reaching unusuccessfully to be profound. This is told through the narration of one of the officers (Scott Brady) who reads the script offscreen with gusto even though the on-screen acting leaves much to be desired. One great scene has a captured nurse truly giving a Korean officer a good slap when he makes a pass at her in the most disgusting of ways.

Of the ensemble, Robert Blake is instantly recognizable as one of the more troubled soldiers, The rest are buffoons, from the southern country bumpkin whose every word focuses on something involving hayrides or other stereotypical hillbilly traditions and the foreign cook who keeps talking about food as if he was a white version of Forrest Gump's friend, Bubba. The bumpkin soldier known as New Orleans has a goofy smile that never seems to leave his face and makes Gomer Pyle seem like a city slicker. They are annoying in their attempts to create some light-hearted moments, evidence of a desperate script rushed together without thought.

Blake is the only character who has any real evident humanity, but unfortunately, he has little to do. This is an unpleasant and graphic view of the enemy, showing the Asians as brutes and inhuman, only interested in carnage, not ending the war peacefully. Of course, all of the American soldiers and officers are presented as good. Each story that the film introduces doesn't really have any real dramatic strength, and it bogs the film down. It doesn't help that the film steals a ton of newsreel footage inserted to dramatize the situation further. All it succeeds in doing is demonstrating that this film was cheap looking and as unnecessary as the war it dealt with. And just when, at 70 minutes, you think all is going to be wrapped up, something starts up to keep the film going, another annoying element of this fizzing twizzler.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed