Ostensibly a documentary about the art of Dutch glassblowing, and engagingly illustrative at that - with a gently jazz soundtrack - it gradually evolves into something altogether more thought-provoking. Back to the actual blowing, though, and that's quite fascinating to watch - the creative and delicate artistry at work. Perfect geometrical shapes all from a ball or string of molten sand - they look like balloons sometimes. In and out of the white hot ovens. What it slowly gives way to, though, is almost as interesting as the process becomes more mechanised. Not so much with the intricate designs, but the rudimentary bottle making - until, that is, the conveyor goes wrong and it's briefly quite comedic then. Moral? I suppose mechanisation is unstoppable now, but though the handmade might be slower and more expensive, the top only comes off when it's supposed to!
6 Reviews
Visually, one of the best lyrical documentaries I have ever seen..
wlutley18 December 2000
GLASS may be the perfect non-cinema verite documentary film ever made. It tells the story of hand-made vs. machine-made glass products through the brilliant use of visual language. Color, movement, music, sound effects and editing combine to illustrate the contrast between the two types of glass products: artistic and utilitarian. And the difference is clearly and entertainingly presented without a word of narration. This is a film that truly contains not one unneeded shot The jazz score accompanying the visuals can stand on its own as music, yet it is brilliantly married to the diverse and unique portraits of the individual glass blowers featured in the film - all of it in just eleven minutes!
clearly one of the best
tj-7719 December 2002
"Glas" is presented in film schools as an exemplar of what is known as a "process documentary." There's no voice-over to either guide or otherwise influence the viewer. The film is simply shot-after-shot of glass-making. It might have been underwritten by the Dutch bottle industry, because that seems to be its main thrust: the manufacture of bottles. Lotsa shots of mechanization, from wide-shots to mediums to macro close-ups. This film is usually shown as an intended primer for aspiring cinematographers: the exposures and lighting presented particular challenges to the DP. One curious artifact: At the end of the film, there's a credit for someone named, "Ouim Ouenders." Given the Dutch translation/ transposition, vis-a-vis spelling, who, exactly, is that guy? Someone we all might otherwise know?
Simply outstanding : Bert Haanstra creates a marvelous documentary film
FilmCriticLalitRao8 May 2009
Glas-an industrial documentary film by famous Dutch documentary film maker Bert Haanstra is one of the best documentary films made in Europe and elsewhere.It is generally believed that documentary films are not so interesting as feature films.Glas is a film which will surely prove this myth to be wrong.Bert Haanstra has made "Glas" a rewarding film viewing experience as he has included lovely Jazz music instead of opting for any kind of commentary or voice over.The film appears interesting as glass makers are shown as smoking casually as this helps them in their work.They are confident that nothing would go wrong in the course of their work.The artistic dimension of "Glas" is established in a lovely scene which shows how many bottles crack in a series when a single stray bottle is cracked.It is as if a master artist has put numerous strokes of a painting on a single canvas.As painting is an art for an artist,glass making must also be considered as an art.The widespread popularity of this film has enabled many people to learn from it and use it for their works.One example of Glas being used concerns its showing at Film and Television Institute of India,Pune by renowned authority on cinema Mr.P.K.Nair.This is something which he has personally told to Mr.Bert Haanstra who has felt proud of this fact.
Excellent documentary showing the creation of various types of glassware and bottles
llltdesq10 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This short understandably won the Academy Award for Documentary, Short. There will be spoilers ahead:
This short is under ten minutes in length. Largely without dialog (there's one voice-over counting off bottles and one shouted line of dialog) this uses visuals and the musical score to tell a story and create a mood.
Roughly the first five minutes shows the creation of various types of glassware from the molten glass state through the finished pieces (vases, glasses and so on). The blowers take basically a blob of molten glass and shape it by blowing through a tube and rolling the tube between their fingers. One of the artisans shown actually puffs on a pipe while he works! At a certain point in the process, when the molten glass is ready, the blob is placed in a mold and the blower shapes the piece within the mold. If there's a base or a handle, those are shaped and added after the base is created. The shaping of those is a skill in itself.
The next section of the short, roughly two minutes, shows the creation of bottles by mechanical processes, from the shaping of the bottles in a mold, through the movement of bottles at various points in the process on conveyor belts to the movement of finished bottles by machine off the belts. It's here that the count and the shouted line are heard, because there's glitch the machines can't correct which requires human intervention to minimize a disaster in the making.
The last segment shows activity which is even more deliberately tied to the rhythm of the score than the earlier parts are. Horns in the score time up with blowers puffing into their pipes, for example. Hand and finger movements on the tubes also tie into the score. It's done perfectly.
This short deserves to be more widely known. Most highly recommended.
This short is under ten minutes in length. Largely without dialog (there's one voice-over counting off bottles and one shouted line of dialog) this uses visuals and the musical score to tell a story and create a mood.
Roughly the first five minutes shows the creation of various types of glassware from the molten glass state through the finished pieces (vases, glasses and so on). The blowers take basically a blob of molten glass and shape it by blowing through a tube and rolling the tube between their fingers. One of the artisans shown actually puffs on a pipe while he works! At a certain point in the process, when the molten glass is ready, the blob is placed in a mold and the blower shapes the piece within the mold. If there's a base or a handle, those are shaped and added after the base is created. The shaping of those is a skill in itself.
The next section of the short, roughly two minutes, shows the creation of bottles by mechanical processes, from the shaping of the bottles in a mold, through the movement of bottles at various points in the process on conveyor belts to the movement of finished bottles by machine off the belts. It's here that the count and the shouted line are heard, because there's glitch the machines can't correct which requires human intervention to minimize a disaster in the making.
The last segment shows activity which is even more deliberately tied to the rhythm of the score than the earlier parts are. Horns in the score time up with blowers puffing into their pipes, for example. Hand and finger movements on the tubes also tie into the score. It's done perfectly.
This short deserves to be more widely known. Most highly recommended.
"Ouim Ouenders"
tekstverwerking22 September 2007
I'd say filmmaker Wim Wenders. QUOTE: "Glas" is presented in film schools as an exemplar of what is known as a "process documentary." There's no voice-over to either guide or otherwise influence the viewer. The film is simply shot-after-shot of glass-making. It might have been underwritten by the Dutch bottle industry, because that seems to be its main thrust: the manufacture of bottles. Lotsa shots of mechanization, from wide-shots to mediums to macro close-ups. This film is usually shown as an intended primer for aspiring cinematographers: the exposures and lighting presented particular challenges to the DP. One curious artifact: At the end of the film, there's a credit for someone named, "Ouim Ouenders." Given the Dutch translation/ transposition, vis-a-vis spelling, who, exactly, is that guy? Someone we all might otherwise know? UNQUOTE
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
