Night of the Quarter Moon (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A "ripped from the headlines" trash classic
melvelvit-118 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Roderick "Chuck" Nelson (John Drew Barrymore), scion of one of San Francisco's wealthiest families and a prisoner of war during the Korean conflict, was never the same after his experiences and his brother, Lexington (Dean Jones), thinks the best thing for him is a Mexican fishing trip to help snap him out of his lassitude. While there, Chuck falls for his guide's daughter, Ginny (Julie London), who confesses she's "a quarter" (black) when he proposes marriage but, deeply in love and a new man because of it, he only replies, "Statistics bore me". Chuck brings Ginny home to his controlling mother, Cornelia (Agnes Moorehead), who seems to outwardly approve but when the couple are photographed in her cousins' (Anna Kashfi & Nat King Cole) nightclub and newspaper headlines scream the young millionaire married a quadroon, all hell breaks loose. Turned out of their hotel, harassed by neighbors, and treated harshly by police, the couple are separated by Cornelia who uses drugs and brainwashing to bring about an annulment on the grounds Ginny concealed her heritage from Chuck. During a sensational courtroom trial with everyone against her, Ginny is forced to strip before the judge to see if she's tan all over...

The Civil Rights movement was a hot-button topic of national concern in the late 1950s when MGM decided to exploit the issue with a soapy saga of miscegenation produced by schlockmeister Albert Zugsmith and directed by eccentric auteur Hugo Haas, a fringe-dwelling cross between Ed Wood and Alfred Hitchcock. Haas, a past master at the puerile potboiler, hit the big time here but thankfully couldn't break free from the methods his obsessive madness invariably took. Low-rent psychodrama is just that and all a bigger budget does is make a silk purse out of a sow's ear to the point where, in this case, Haas' murky run of the mill mise–en–scènes were considered "careful suspense" by the NY Times. What's interesting about this sordid exercise in exploitation is that Haas' mania for masochistic romance eclipses any real opportunity for the exploration of prejudice and the one-dimensional black and white hate comes through loud and clear. No attempt is made to show grey and because intolerance is a given with no hope for the future, the lovers' persecution seems right out of "Oliver Twist". The couple's rocky road does, however, make for entertaining melodrama and the above-average acting for this sort of thing also kicks it up a notch or two.

Sexy singer Julie London, with her trademark mane cascading down her back, gives her "high yeller" a restraint not generally associated with put-upon heroines and John Drew Barrymore's vulnerable Korean War vet showed that sensitivity was actually within the cult actor's ken. The genteel veneer Agnes Moorehead gives her mean, manipulative matriarch adds some class to the crass crises cooked up for our entertainment while Albert Zugsmith's quirky stable of quasi-personalities such as Jackie Coogan, bandleader Ray Anthony, and Charles Chaplin, Jr. make their usual unmemorable impressions. Marlon Brando's volatile wife, the exotic Anna Kashfi, was more famous for her messy divorce than any real talent she may have possessed but she acquits herself nicely as the elegant hostess-wife of nitery owner Nat King Cole who croons the title tune and sings another while tickling the ivories in his swanky club. They're progressive blacks, civilized and wise to the ways of the world, creating a stark counterpoint to the small-minded neighbors, cops, business owners, and family that surround the seemingly star-crossed pair who, incidentally, consummate their love on a beach the night of the quarter moon. Julie's fisherman father is also an exception, a salty Irishman who felt he married above his meager station when he took a "mixed" maiden as his bride and Julie's black lawyer, intelligently interpreted by James Edwards, embodies all that's good in an otherwise predatory profession and makes a revealing "whitebread" role model for his race.

The movie's take on race "relations" plays it safe by making Julie's grandmother a Portugese-Angolan descended from African royalty (which speaks volumes on Hollywood's own bias) and stops short of calling the kettle black in other ways, too. The closest this movie gets to raw reality is a group of neighborhood teens (led by Chaplin) surrounding Julie while taunting, "eenie meenie miney mo" (as in "catch a _____ by the toe...") but that's probably more a case of Production Code prohibitions than any true sensitivity. The movie was obviously inspired by an infamous 1924 court trial that rocked the nation (Rhinelander v. Rhinelander) and although attitudes towards interracial marriage hadn't progressed much in 35 years, change was on the horizon and NIGHT OF THE QUARTER MOON was given a hopeful ending that didn't happen in real life.

The movie may transcend it's exploitative raison d'etre by being first and foremost a love story but there's no denying it's also a "ripped from the headlines" upper-crust "kitchen sink" stinker -and lots of fun because of it. London's Sunday Times awarded this trash classic its dreaded "ring up and complain" rating but I say write Warner Archives and request a re-release on DVD.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cry me a river
ulicknormanowen11 March 2022
With "Lizzie" ,Hugo Haas had begun to improve his cast : her habituée Cleo Moore and the love triangle she was part of with him and the likes of John Agar was replaced by great names such as Eleanor Parker , along with Richard Boone and Joan Blondell.

"Night of the quarter moon " can boast two famous singers :Julie London (also an actress) and Nat King Cole along with luminaries such as Agnes Moorehead. Both can be heard in the film.

The screenplay borrows one of the subplots of George Stevens' "giant" : Dennis Hopper and his Mexican wife Elsa Cardenàs who were snubbed by nouveau riche James Dean is his stately mansion ; Elsa Cardenàs was a true Mexican ,which is not London's case ,but the latter is convincing in this liberal melodrama. And heavy make -up helps.

Note that Miss London escapes a nude strip tease by the skin of her teeth for the second time (see also her western :"man of the west" by Anthony Mann)

Considering it was made in 1959 ,at the Civil rights Movement (1954-1968)time, it can be considered ,from that point of view,a courageous movie ; the trial is a good moment even though the judge seems a little too liberal ; another good idea is to show the wealthy family and the adamant mother replaced ,in the hero's delirium ,by his war enemies.

The ending avoids the de rigueur happy end : the fight has only begun for the couple.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I guess mother won't be coming to dinner.
mark.waltz1 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This outlandishly bad racial drama comes from MGM Studios, the movie factory which once proclaimed that it had more stars than there were in the heavens. Louis B. Mayer would certainly be spinning in his grave if he were to see the type of films such as this one that the studio he work hard to move to the top was putting out. Even with two Oscar winning films in a row ("Gigi", "Ben Hur"), MGM had plenty of dreck, and this is one of the worst of the lot. It's an embarrasment of amateur cliche's, suffering from a hideously rotten script that can only be described as a dime store novel on celluloid, so obviously exploitive that you wonder how such classy actors as Agnes Moorehead and Edward Andrews could acknowledge being a part of it.

The stars are Julie London and John Drew Barrymore, facing a harsh world simply because of the revelation that she has a teeny, tiny bit of black in her racial makeup. Yes, I realize that this was the late 1950's so certainly there would be cause for concern, and certainly, a wealthy San Francisco society matron like Moorehead's character might object. Moorehead isn't an outright obvious meddlesome mother, and her passive/aggressive nature is revealed slowly. She has obviously coddled her two sons (Barrymore and Dean Jones) a bit too much, but she's very welcoming to London at first, even lending her a fur stole to wear out for the evening. Suddenly, she's ranting on the phone about the newspaper headline exposing London and having Barrymore committed to a sanatarium when neighbors file assault charges against him and London. This leads to the most absurd annulment trial where Moorehead's attorney (Edward Andrews) tries in his most obnoxiously cocky manner to discredit London in every way possible. Only the great James Edwards here shows any dignity as London's counsel, the one human element in this whole fiasco outside London and Barrymore.

As old friends of London's, Anna Kafshi and the great Nat King Cole underplay their roles of advisers against London fighting to get Cole back, making themselves nearly as nasty as Moorehead and Jones. The scene where Barrymore gets out of the sanatarium simply by slugging two large guards is way beyond unrealistic. Edwards cones up with a ploy to have London strip completely to prove there's no way she could hide her race during a nude swim, leading to the most ludicrous way of snapping Barrymore out of his manipulated conclusion. Moorehead is forced to utter some extremely nasty lines (asking London if her son proposed to her in a cotton field, while Andrews seems to be revealing his disgust with the script by saying all his lines through a sneer. This is a true bomb, saved only by the determination of the cast to add a teeny amount of dignity to a film they obviously knew couldn't be saved.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Night of the Quartermoon, (the color of her skin).
peegeedee323 March 2007
Here I am in 2007 replying to a post from the past, but whoever posted that first post was off! This movie was so true to life, it was scary to me, a Black-American, that it gave me chills. A friend has this movie in his "Black-Only" collection, along with other obscure movies I had never even heard of (such as "Up against the Wall" with Smokey Jackson)?? I ended up crying, wondering why any person of mixed heritage would go to such lengths to be accepted by another culture, especially one that is usually so adverse to the mixing of their blood with so called "inferiors", such as they called Black and other minority races! Love must surely be able to overcome many obstacles to flourish, but this is even too much heartache to have to live through, even for love! A very interesting and true to life story. The acting was wonderful, even if Julie London was only a singer, she seemed to convey the fact that she, as the character, loved above all else and John D. is just as good. His mother, played by Agnes Moorehead was a proper witch, and I wished someone would have looked into her background before we got to far into the movie, because of the saying "I think the lady doth protest too much". She may have had a touch of African blood in her lineage as well. I give this movie high marks for entertainment, and content.
22 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
They Were Kidding, Right?
Bucs196020 October 2005
Put two schlock masters together, Albert Zugsmith (producer) and Hugo Haas (director) and you come up with a total mess of a movie. This film is grotesque, even more so because it was made at MGM. Thankfully, it was the last time that these two gentlemen ever got their foot in the door of a major studio.

Basically, the story is about a young woman, who has African-American heritage but "passes" for Caucasian. She is played by the glacially beautiful Julie London, better known as a popular singer than a film star. She marries John Drew Barrymore, who just could never parlay his famous name, except as the son of John Sr. and the father of Drew. His character is from a socially prestigious family and when they discover that Ms. London is not "racially pure", you would think that World War III was imminent. The newspapers blow the whistle on her, her black relatives are beaten up and she ends up in court, stripping to prove that her skin is white. Absolutely unpleasant.....this film is exploitation at its worst and MGM should have been ashamed to release it. It's unbelievable.
12 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
it is a quality movie
JERGIROCCO31 January 2004
It is very good motion picture about the subject of race relations and bigotry. Everyone should see this movie as it was very well produced and the acting was excellent It is too bad John Drew Barrymore did not stay in movies and television as he was a very good actor.

Jerry L Girocco
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Over the top
mls418227 September 2023
They couldn't have set about to make a quality film about the social, cultural or civil rights issues of the 1960s. This movie is pure exploitation. Bad writing, bad acting. Gaping mistakes.

No doubt society was unenlightened and people were treated badly but this film doesn't properly delve into it. It is all over the top. The headlines of newspapers in the film are so rude they are laughing out loud. The stunts I'm the courtroom are so ludicrous they are laughable.

Then there is the acting. Julie London us horrible as always and Barrymore is worse. Agnes Morehead is mostly wasted.

The only good thing in this film is Nst King Cole.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's tacky and it's cheesy but...
danldhatu9 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Of course, when you put Albert Zugsmith and Hugo Haas together as producer and director, you aren't going to end up with something approaching GONE WITH THE WIND. Hell, you're not even going to end up with anything as good as FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLFMAN.

Julie London is beautiful, but incredibly miscast as a woman with some African heritage passing for white. Even with black hair and a suntan, she was one of the WHITEST women around. It's not for nothing that she later played a character named "Dixie" on TVs EMERGENCY.

But hang on here! For those who would scoff and say that this movie is unrealistic, I've got a piece of news for you. It's based on a TRUE STORY! The whole thing is told in a book called "LOVE ON TRIAL : an American scandal in black and white" by Earl Lewis and Heidi Ardizzone. Lots of this stuff really happened, including the young wife having to bare her flesh before the Judge to see just how "colored" her nipples were.

Unlike the movie, however, in the end, the young husband wimped out and divorced the woman, caving in to his rich father's demands. Money talks.

Too bad.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed