The Hook (1963) Poster

(1963)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Any Day A War Ends Is A Nice Day"
bkoganbing2 May 2008
It's 1953 in the wee small hours of the Korean War winding down. While the peace talks proceed slowly at Panmunjom, the UN forces are evacuating their positions as the truce lines come into being. But the fighting still goes on. Another Korean War film, Pork Chop Hill, also dealt with this time of the war which President Truman called a police action.

A Korean pilot in a MIG Jet attacks some US soldiers who are loading supplies on a freighter and only three of them survive, Kirk Douglas, Robert Walker, Jr., and Nick Adams. Later on the pilot of the MIG is shot down and he's picked up by the freighter that the three soldiers are on with the supplies which includes a lot of barrels of oil.

Radioing for instructions, Kirk Douglas is told by a South Korean major to kill the North Korean pilot. He's certainly up for it, he's a veteran from this war and World War II. Walker doesn't want to and Adams is kind of on the fence because he's personally loyal to Douglas who got him out of a jam once.

The majority of The Hook is spent on the conflict between the three GIs. It's a rather unreal story because these three would be up for war crimes charges, Walker realizes this best. But two wars against oriental people have given Douglas some pronounced views on the subject. The holes in the script are covered up by the performances of the cast.

Nehemiah Persoff turns in a fine performance as the ship's captain who on his ship is the one in charge. But the best acting is done by Filipino player Enrique Magalona as the confused and frightened North Korean prisoner.

Pork Chop Hill is a better film, but The Hook is not a bad one. The ending is ironic to say the least.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intense Korean War drama featuring Kirk Douglas, from director George Seaton
jacobs-greenwood20 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by George Seaton, with a screenplay by Henry Denker that was based on a novel by Vahé Katcha, this intense Korean War drama appropriately features Kirk Douglas as Sergeant P.J. Briscoe, who's tasked with executing a North Korean pilot prisoner he refers to as 'the gook' (Enrique Magalona, in one of only three films in which he appeared). The prisoner, who had just killed Lieutenant Troy (Mark Miller) in a bombing raid before crash landing himself, is humanly rescued by Private O.A. Dennison (Robert Walker Jr., son of his same named actor father and actress Jennifer Jones, in his film debut), who's more intelligent than your 'average joe'. Nick Adams plays Pvt. V.R. Hackett, the only other member of this group, who's beholden to Briscoe for reasons to be revealed. The military personnel were collecting a stash of fuel which has to be transported to where it's needed by a civilian charter vessel, run by Finnish Captain Van Ryn (Nehemiah Persoff). When Briscoe calls into HQ, he learns that a school and a hospital were just bombed by the enemy and is ordered, by the South Korean officer now in charge, to dispose of his prisoner of war, who Van Ryn had made bunkmate of the others. So, the film is an emotional and psychological thriller as the three discuss the required act and the fate of their prisoner.

Briscoe has but a short time left to serve before he can retire at 40 with a full pension, even though he has no one to go home to, as Dennison discovers. He's a hard man whose father and military experience has convinced him that weakness means death. Briscoe has taken Dennison under his wing, but rides him while trying to instill these same values. At the same time, Briscoe has 'control' of Hackett, who used to be a Corporal but was bucked down to Private by the Sergeant who was 'protecting' him after a drunken brawl with another officer; this, however, turns out to have been a self serving act. At different times, each of the men tries to kill the prisoner, but each finds killing another man face-to-face more difficult than expected. Dennison is the humanist whose words 'work' on the other two and the two Privates actually try to free their prisoner. The ship's captain and crew doesn't get involvement per their neutrality in the conflict. Later, when Briscoe is about to report their combined insubordination to their superiors, they learn that a cease-fire had been called, effectively letting them off 'the hook' for not following orders. But they'd left their prisoner alone; knowing his fate, he escapes and then tries to sabotage the ship full of oil barrels. The language barrier not only prevents the Americans from telling the North Korean about the armistice, but it leads to his own tragic ending.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unexpectedly Compelling
racliff12 July 2013
I enjoy watching movies and will most often make a selection because of the actors, then maybe because of the theme, or occasionally because of a recommendation. "The Hook" is a movie that I had never heard of, so seeing Kirk Douglas on the cover is what hooked me for this war movie. Also Robert Walker Jr is someone that I first saw in TV's _"Star Trek" (1966) {Charlie X (#1.2)}_ (qv) playing a 17yr boy, so what would he be like in a movie produced 3 years earlier.

The opening of this movie includes "This is a story of men in war, not men at war. And the two are not the same." To understand my view, I am a baby-boomer who has never served in the military, but I have known many who have served. Most of these men don't really talk about their experiences, so I often wonder if my views on war movies would be very different of those people who have served. My preference would be that countries would not be at war, but regardless of this I believe we need to support those who chose to serve in the roles in which they are assigned.

"The Hook" is a title that showed no relevance before I watched the movie, and I never did catch. Is this an anti-war movie, or a personal interaction story, or war conflict drama, and this question repeats itself for 90 minutes. Regardless the movie itself is compelling. We are engaged with three surviving servicemen vacating a military post upon a 'neutral' merchant vessel, plus an enemy retrieved after he has bailed from his failing aircraft. Your journey is to imagine your response to their scenarios. Would you have rescued the enemy at all? How would you treat him on this merchant ship? Just imagine how you would respond to engaging an enemy on the battlefield; how is it different or the same, across an eating table? Kirk Douglas, Robert Walked, and Nick Adams are the enlisted men facing these scenarios.

I enjoyed this movie, in spite of moments of "I wouldn't do that!". The movie is a must for Kirk Douglas fans, and highly recommended for anyone interested in war movies. I don't know if actual enlisted people would behave this way, but "The Hook" is wonderfully acted and does not need the tonnage of special effects that are today's production norms.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intriguing and thrilling drama with tense events when an enemy pilot is taken prisoner by three American soldiers
ma-cortes24 June 2020
It is set during an evacuation in the waning days of the Korean War , this is a story of men in war , not men at war. And the two are not the same. Hence, this film is dedicated not to any army, navy, air or other military force, but to those who are the lowest common denominator of all military forces...and the highest...the individual man. For in the brief and quiet intervals between the loud and terrible noises of war, he is capable of great and revealing moments of nobility . As three American soldiers (Kirk Douglas , Robert Walker , Nick Adams) retrieve an enemy airman and take him prisoner aboard the civilian ship captained by Capt. Van Ryn (Nehemiah Persoff) and returning them to their lines . When an order comes down from the commander-in-chief the sergeant in charge, Briscoe, orders his men, Dennison and Hackett , to carry out the execution , before reviewing the evidence . As they cannot bring themselves to follow the order to execute their Korean detained. But first one and then the other refuse to follow the order. A STRANGE AND COMPELLING STORY in these days of man's inhumanity to man. It's haunting theme will not soon be forgotten, for it proves that all men, no matter how different, have one thing in common...their humanity!

This story is about such a moment in the lives of three men and although it could have happened in any time or any war , it is set in 1953 , Korean War , being starred by top-notch cast under superb and tense direction by George Seaton who makes this movie excellent in every aspect . This ultra-slick calustrophobic picture contains thriller , suspense , intense drama , extreme tension and is quite entertaining although with some flaws and gaps . Made in television style and set in the final days of the Korean War about soldiers who receive an order from their superiors : to kill a captured airman , however , being reluctant to execute him , as an intriguing stand-off ensues between the seemingly heartless sergeant and his conscience-stricken men . Though the whole is mostly set on a freighter ship it never lacks for taut , suspense , intrigue and inspired direction . The struggle behind closed cabins is tense , charged and riveting .Henry Denker's brilliant script was left virtually intact in its move to feature film based on the novel "L'Hamecon" by Vahé Katcha. It was splendidly directed by George Seaton with an extraordinary plethora of actors who give magnificent performances as Kirk Douglas and Robert Walker Jr , both of them recently deceased and Nick Adams who unfortunately died very young at 36 . The painstaking rehearsals for the film lasted exhaustingly a few weeks. However, nowadays none of the twelve stars are still alive . The acting level of the cast during some of the intense discussions and debates almost bursts in the screen .

It contains a moving and thrilling musical score by Larry Adler. As well as evocative cinematography in black and white by Joseph Ruttenberg. This old-fashioned motion picture was professionally directed by George Seaton (Country girl , Miracle on 34th street , Chicken Every Sunday, Anything can happen , Apartment for Peggy , Airport) . Being directed in the wake of the famous plays from the '¨Golden Age of Television¨ as Caine's Mutiny , 12 Angry Men, The Desperate Hours , Marty ,The Petrified Forest , Birdman of Alcatraz . Rating . 7/10 . Better than average .
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nick Adams can act!
HotToastyRag1 July 2021
When you think of Nick Adams, you probably think of Boomer in Picnic, the irritating nerd who pesters Kim Novak for a date. Or you remember his drunken ridiculousness in Pillow Talk as he paws Doris Day in his car. You certainly don't think of a good actor, which is why you should rent the heavy drama The Hook. If he earned a Rag award for his performance and beat out Bobby Darin in Captain Newman, M. D., it's a safe bet he's impressive.

This mental thriller involves a prisoner of war held captive by three American soldiers, Kirk Douglas, Nick Adams, and Robert Walker Jr. The unnamed Korean (played by Pancho Magalona) doesn't speak any English, so they're just left to interpret his expressions from his haunting stare. When they receive orders to kill the prisoner, each man goes through his own reluctance to pull the trigger. Kirk is the macho head honcho ordering everyone around, Bob Jr. Is the sensitive one who tries to get to know the prisoner, and Nick is the obedient soldier with a secret past.

This movie is very tense and at times hard to watch, especially since you can imagine situations like it playing out in real life. Sometimes soldiers received orders not to take prisoners. The Hook will keep you on the edge of your seat, so don't get up for more popcorn.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fair serious drama
Penfold-1314 August 1999
Kirk Douglas runs the gamut of emotion from about A to C, and most of the rest of the performances are similarly limited. In other words, some better actors would have made this a better picture. The most convincing performance comes from Enrique Mangalona as the POW, who, speaking no English, is almost silent throughout.

It's by no means action-packed. The action all takes place on board a neutral ship, on which three US servicemen wrestle with their consciences which get in the way of their murdering a Korean POW.

It's a psychological think-piece, but it's tense and quite involving. It's not in the class of Twelve Angry Men, but it's that sort of genre.

Not worth staying in for, or renting the video, but very likely better than the crud on the other channels, given that it's most likely to be shown as a space filler in the small hours.
10 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The thinking man's anti-war film.
mark.waltz15 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This drama about the ending of the Korean war is profound for several reasons. While the performance by Robert Walker Jr. may not be placed in the acting hall of fame, most viewers will identify with his character's inability to kill the prisoner of war (Pancho Magalona) they have captured after the plane he used to attack them crashed. There are only three survivors from the attack: Walker, Nick Adams and their sergeant in command, Kirk Douglas. Wanting to turn Walker into a complete soldier, Douglas takes the orders he has been given to kill him and hands it over to Walker. But it is obvious from the start that the gentle Walker will be unable to go through the order, and then Adams ends up with a gun in his hand. It appears that he believes that he owes a debt of gratitude towards Douglas, but Walker utilizes the analogy of a dead man's eyes following its killer through the remainder of their life to scare him in order to prevent him from going through with it. Then, it's Douglas's turn, and the same analogy of the eyes are utilized. When armistice is declared, there is a twist in the drama that gives the film a downbeach, disappointing ending, but fortunately, what had happened before remain strongly in the viewer's memory.

This film indeed has a claustrophobic feeling towards it. You get the opportunity to know a little something about not only Douglas, Walker and Adams, but Magdalona as well. Certainly, there will be little sympathy fort Douglas throughout most of the film, but his character is indeed very complex, and he makes him understandable if not always likeable. There is definite sympathy for both Walker and Adams, and of the three actors, it is Adams who delivers the best performance. Magdalona is outstanding barely saying a word, showing that acting can be done through the eyes rather than through the lips.

Veteran character actor Nehemiah persoff is also very good as the ship's British captain, basically staying away and leaving the Americans to themselves. It is a small, quiet film with many profound moments, but it is also obvious that it will not end happily even though if you were is never sure who will end up being the most unhappy or victimized at the end.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Claustrophobic and intense psychological drama
herbqedi8 July 2004
For fans of the taut and psychologically grueling and philosophically provocative filmed one-act play, The Hook is right in the class of Lifeboat, The Petrified Forest, Obsession, The Desperate Hours, 12 Angry Men, and Time Limit -- all among my personal favorite movies. The movie hinges on one dilemma: What does a military man do when given a direct order from a Commanding Officer to kill an unarmed POW in cold blood? The questions of right and wrong are further blurred by the fact they are informed that all the other soldiers in the unit have all been wiped out by a brutal North Korean attack. Aboard a friendly vessel en route to reconnoiter with another fighting division, a Sergeant (Kirk Douglas), Corporal (Nick Adams), and Private (Robert Walker Jr.) have two days to dispose of the prisoner or disobey a direct order. For his part, the prisoner shows every sign of singlemindedly waiting for an opening to escape. He speaks no English and only one of the three speaks even a few words of Korean. The Sergeant orders each subordinate, in turn, to execute the prisoner, but they are both quite conflicted also.

Kirk Douglas is perfectly cast as the tough-as-nails-on-the-outside-Sergeant Briscoe. But, Nick Adams truly steals the movie as the Corporal who nearly relinquishes his humanity trying desperately to support his Sergeant. Walker gives a solid if unremarkable performance as the Private that Briscoe relentlessly tries to bully into executing his dirty work.

That's all of it. So, if you are looking for a war movie with lots of action and visual effects, look elsewhere. But, if you wish to look into the souls of three enlisted men faced with Hobson's choices within an unrelenting pressure cooker, this fast-moving and well-acted psychological study will haunt you for the rest of your film-going life. I give it 10/10 for its genre.
32 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
overly written play
SnoopyStyle30 May 2021
Sgt. P. J. Briscoe (Kirk Douglas) and two others are clearing out an outpost when they are attacked by a plane during the waning days of the Korean War. Their job is to destroy all the equipment and load the remaining fuel onto a civilian ship run by Capt. Van Ryn. The plane crashes and Private Dennison manages to save one of the pilots. The three Americans and their prisoner get a ride on Van Ryn's ship. They are ordered by command to get rid of the prisoner.

This is trying to be a character study play rather than a compelling war thriller. There seems to be an easy solution right from the beginning. The way the order is worded, Briscoe could simply let the prisoner swim for freedom. There has to be more. By his own words, Briscoe is only concerned about getting out of the Army and retiring with a full pension. He's been hardened by the war but he needs to be harder. There has to be some malevolence in his character for the good vs evil to work at peak performance. It's also weird to have the enemy bomb them with what looks like a WWII allied bomber. The dialogue is overly wordy. I like the unique premise but it feels too much like an overly written play. It feels dragged out.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not always well paced, but an excellent look at human nature.
planktonrules27 May 2017
The intro to this film indicates that this story is universal and could apply to any war...or any country...and this is quite true. And, this universality of the story make this an exceptional war film.

When the story begins, some American soldiers are loading trucks with airplane fuel which will soon be transported to the front. However, during this process, a North Korean plane attacks...killing one of the men. The plane soon crashes and a lone man bails out of the craft. Now when the surviving three American soldiers enter the ship, they have a prisoner.

Once aboard the ship, the men contact headquarters and are told that they were NOT to bring the prisoner in with them. In other words, they were to kill him! This is clearly a war crime...and is against the articles of war. The sergeant (Kirk Douglas) clearly seems to LIKE this order...one of the men, one of the privates (Robert Walker Jr.) thinks the order is monstrous and refuses to do it. The sergeant takes delight in goading this private but despite this, he will NOT kill the man. So, the sadistic sergeant then tries to get the other private to do it...

The story is a great look at human nature...the good as well as the bad. And, it reminds us that the German soldiers of WWII were not the only ones who murdered and chalked it all up to 'just following orders'. A very strong film whose only shortcoming is its pacing (it could have been shortened a bit and that would have made a stronger picture).
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Typical anti-war movie
jthompson1627 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Typical and inaccurate Hollywood portrayal of men in a difficult situation during war. Showing the American fighting man the way Hollywood wishes he were. Completely false portrayal of a situation that an NCO with 19 years service, including WW II and Korea could have handled easily. The prisoner would have been kept in the ship's brig or some locked space not in the same room as the soldiers. They would not have obeyed the orders of an ROK officer to kill the prisoner. There would have been no hesitation about ignoring the order. No soldier would kill a prisoner he had under complete control behind the front lines. Another thing, using a B-25 as a North Korean bomber was a laugh. In 1953 the US had complete control of the air over all of Korea South of the range of Chinese MIG-15s.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Gooks Are All Sneaky.
rmax30482325 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't make it through to the end, beckoned instead to the comforting embrace of Morpheus. From the one hour that I saw, there was little evidence that I'd missed much. If you take away the name stars, what you wind up with is an inexpensive and very talky B feature.

Kirk Douglas is Master Sergeant Briscoe, in command of two enlisted men, the erratic but compliant PFC Nick Adams, and the humanitarian youngster, Robert Walker Jr. They are the last men to leave a post in Korea, aboard a UN-chartered freighter, captained by Nehemia Persoff. As they leave, they pick up a downed North Korean aviator, half drowned. The Republic of Korea is in charge of the operation and over the radio the commander orders Douglas to kill the prisoner.

There are some nice touches. Persoff runs a practical ship, full of highly explosive gasoline, under a neutral Finnish flag. Ordinarily a situation like this calls for a ship crawling with rats and manned by greasy, scarred, and rebellious lascars. Not in this case. Persoff's ship is tidy and he has a French cook who serves up beef Bourguignon, petite pois, and a robust and determined French wine with a fine nose.

There are very few action scenes, not particularly well done but a welcome interruption to the drama taking place aboard the vessel.

That's about it. The characters argue mostly, but not exclusively, over who is going to shoot and kill the friendly prisoner, Kim, with that .45. Each role is as subtle as a truck. Not even the banter sounds quite right. I suspect the novel might have been better than this adaptation.

Most of the time it resembles a staged play. The three soldiers and their prisoner sit in their cabin and argue. Occasionally there is a visit from the captain or the steward. The men are groomed not like grunts who have been in a combat zone but rather like Hollywood stars. Douglas' moussed hair hasn't a strand out of place. All three were shaved that morning by the studio barber.

Douglas does all right by the role of the sarcastic and ruthless sergeant, tormented by memories of child abuse. You see, that's why he's so tough on his men, especially the boyish non-actor Robert Walker Jr. Douglas is reenacting the role of his brutal father. (Ho hum.) I hope the Korean kid made it to the end of the movie. That's more than I could do.
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Below the studio's usual standard!
JohnHowardReid1 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 31 December 1962 by Perlberg-Seaton Productions. Released through Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. U.S. release: 16 January 1963. New York opening simultaneously at the Embassy 46th Street and the Kips Bay theaters: 15 February 1963. U.K. release: 9 June 1963. 5 reels. 8,794 feet. 98 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: To transport a dangerously high-octane plane fuel from an abandoned airstrip on a Korean island, is the mission of a four-man navy team, whose base is low on fuel.

COMMENT: An unusually talkative and pretentious film from M-G-M, usually the home of slap-happy escapist entertainment. There's hardly enough action for a half-hour TV serial. For the rest of the time, the three principals, led by Kirk Douglas, who is the chief culprit, just stand about yakking on the moral dilemmas of war.

True, the few action spots are excitingly handled, but the rest of the film is both stupefying and routine. It is also cluttered with lots of unnecessary close-ups — especially of Mr. Douglas.

A bit of location filming helps, but otherwise production values and credits are well below M-G-M's usual slick standard.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed