Frankenstein Created Woman (1967) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
93 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Silly but fun Hammer film
preppy-322 September 2005
Dr. Frankenstein (Peter Cushing) has discovered how to contain the soul of somebody after they had died. His helper Hans (Robert Morris) is (unjustly) found guilty of a murder committed by three other men and guillotined. Hans' girlfriend Christina (Susan Denberg) kills herself. Frankenstein saves Hans' soul and puts it in her. She comes out as a beautiful woman but has Hans thirst for revenge...

As you can see logic does not play a strong role in this picture. For one thing Denberg is introduced as a dark haired, horribly scarred woman. After the "operation" she's blond-haired and looks perfect! Also, when she goes out to kill the men responsible for Hans death, she seems to know EXACTLY where they'll be (I love how she just guessed that Johann would be in a coach and it would break down). Still, Hammer films were never strong on logic so this can be forgiven. Also there's some dreadful day-for-night shooting (another Hammer trademark). Despite all this I DO love this film. It moves quickly and has some pretty bloody scenes (for 1967). There's also a flash of nudity in a bedroom scene.

The acting is very good. Thorley Walters gives a good performance as Dr. Hertz; Morris is actually pretty good as Hans; even Denberg isn't bad (although her voice was dubbed). Best of all, of course, is Peter Cushing. He plays Frankenstein to perfection showing the doctors obsession with creating life.

One of the better Hammer Frankenstein movies. Just turn off your mind and enjoy. I give it an 8.
25 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
best ''Hammer'' films
yusufpiskin29 July 2020
As I watch more Hammer films, it strikes me just how sad so many of them are.

Innocents and lost souls find themselves in a similar place in the afterlife, and it never ends happily for them there either. Here you have Susan Denberg, born with a facial disfigurement, taunted by the local toffs, who then sees her boyfriend executed. And that's just the start of her problems before an inevitable downbeat ending.

Hammer horror films, these days, are usually remembered mostly for Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, and also quite often for their campness. But they're almost always quite serious-minded horror tales that rarely have the get-out of a joke or a comedy character. They're also surprisingly aware in terms of societal issues. I can just imagine the three upper-class blokes who taunt Denberg here being members of the Bullingdon Club or something.

Certainly one of the better or even best Hammer films that I've seen.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I spit on your soul!
hitchcockthelegend12 October 2010
Frankenstein Created Woman is a Hammer Films production that is directed by Terence Fisher. Written by Anthony Hinds under the alias of John Elder, it stars Peter Cushing, Susan Denberg, Thorley Walters, Robert Morris & Derek Fowlds. Cinematography is by Arthur Grant and the music score by James Bernard.

Baron Frankenstein (Cushing) is dabbling with transference of the soul, when Christina (Denberg), a disfigured local who girl commits suicide after her lover Hans (Morris) is wrongfully executed, comes his way for revival, it sets the wheels in motion for violent and bloody revenge.

Bonkers plot and bonkers movie, but one that's well regarded in critical circles and by fans of Hammer Horror in general, and even one Martin Scorsese has it on his favourite movies list. Reworking Bride Of Frankenstein into a metaphysical based tale is close to being a genius idea, even if at times it's difficult to know if it's meant to be funny or not. The thematics most certainly are intelligent and well played out, not just the notion of transferring a peasant boy's soul into that of a former cripple who now looks like (and is) a playboy model, but also class snobbery, corrupt justice system, bullying and of course revenge. All crammed into a 90 minute movie.

However, some scenes are just too daft to take seriously if they were meant to be so in the first place? After crafting bona fide horror classics like Curse Of Frankenstein, Dracula and The Mummy, Terence Fisher owes Hammer Horror fans absolutely nothing. But gauging his efforts here is tough to do, for the blend isn't quite right. Moody and almost dreamlike in tone, it's also low on production values and, Cushing excepted, performed all very hammy by the overacting cast. But again, that may well have been the remit when shooting began?

It's a safe recommend to Hammer fans because it's entertaining on either front, as a comedy or a dark little chiller. But personally I wouldn't be surprised to see it rated from anything between 1/10 to 10/10 across internet sites because it's really an odd piece of Brit cinema. So I'll sit on the fence and go 7/10 for it.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Outstanding Hammer film
cfisanick31 January 2003
Of all the many films in the longstanding Hammer Frankenstein series, after "The Curse of Frankenstein," I like this one the best. It has a classic, almost mythic, structure of the lover who sacrifices himself to preserve the virtue of his beloved and a good deal of existential discussion about human nature. But beyond the heavy academics of its plot, Peter Cushing is truly great here. He's completely sympathetic, intelligent, and witty as a man struggling outside society's version of morality. Some people criticize Terence Fisher as a director who--apart from "Dracula" and "The Devil Rides Out"--had a static and slow-paced directorial style. They're completely wrong. Fisher was a master of the medium, a genius of composition whose films demonstrate so much intelligence. I miss the 1960's, Fisher, and Hammer Films.
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I know who I am and what I have to do. Forgive me.
lastliberal29 October 2010
Susan Denberg was a Playboy Playmate in 1966, and had four screen appearances, before she went back to Europe. She becomes Dr. Frankenstein's latest subject.

Each of these films seem to get more and more elaborate as Dr. Frankenstein stretches the bounds of science. Of course, one has to believe in the existence of a soul to follow his logic, but that is his definition of life.

After her boyfriend Hans (Robert Morris) is unjustly executed for a murder committed by three spoiled rich kids, Christina (Denberg) takes her own life. But, Frankenstein works his magic and puts Hans soul into Christina and the horror begins as they take their revenge.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Offbeat but fun sequel
Vornoff-322 April 2011
I like this one a lot better than the previous sequel, even though it also lacks Christopher Lee. Cushing seems more interested in the script, though, and the whole concept is more engaging. Basically, Frankenstein is now working with an aging and drunken doctor in yet another small German town, and he discovers a means to preserve a soul and place it into (of course) a dead body. This time, though, he decides to try taking the soul of his young assistant, executed for a crime he did not commit, and place it into the body of said assistant's hot young lover (Susan Denberg), after she kills herself. The new man-woman becomes dedicated to killing the men who raped her and set him up to be framed. Again, this is rather racy stuff for the material, and there's an unfortunate lack of monster makeup (except for part of the film, in which Denberg has a facial deformity), but I quite enjoy it.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Good (and Funny) Hammer's Film
claudio_carvalho11 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Minor Spoilers

In the Nineteenth Century, in the small village of Balkan, Baron Frankenstein (Peter Cushing) is performing experiences of transference of human soul to another body, with the support of his assistant Dr. Hertz (Thorley Waters) and the young Hans (Robert Morris). Hans is in love with the deformed Christina (Susan Denberg), the daughter of a local landlord. When Christina's father is killed by three mean and arrogant men, Hans is unfairly accused of murder and sent to the guillotine. Christina commits suicide, and Frankenstein decides to transfer the soul of Hans to Christina's body. Later, he fixes Christina, and she becomes a gorgeous woman looking for revenge.

"Frankenstein Created Woman" is another good Hammer's film. The story is very naive and even funny, and in the present days, people would certainly be malicious with the fact of a man and a woman's soul living in the same body. Peter Cushing is great in the role of the intelligent and visionary Baron Frankenstein, certainly a man ahead of his time. The Playboy playmate Susan Denberg is amazingly beautiful, and I do not know what happened with this beautiful actress, who vanished after a few movies (including Star Trek's episode "Mudd's Women"), in 1966 and 1967. This movie is a very reasonable production of Hammer and a great entertainment. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Frankenstein Criou a Mulher" ("Frankenstein Created the Woman")
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the best of the Hammer Frankenstein series, but still entertaining in its own way
Leofwine_draca19 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A strange addition to the Frankenstein cycle, and indeed the Hammer output, this film slotted neatly between 1964's THE EVIL OF FRANKENSTEIN and 1969's FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED. The film is uncharacteristic of Hammer's other work in that it does not have the same Gothic atmosphere we are so used to seeing; instead, melodrama and romance take centre stage even to the Baron's antics. Even Terence Fisher's colour palette seems brighter than usual for his filmography.

However, although the film is not one of Hammer's best, there are still numerous reasons one might find it enjoyable. Peter Cushing stars in one of his best roles ever, and is indeed great as the scientist obsessed with discovering the secrets of life...and death. His ruthlessness is to the fore here, only superceded by his turn in the sequel. Unfortunately he does not appear that much in this film, and when he does it is as a father figure to Susan Denberg, with his intentions and personality not being clearly studied.

Cushing is unusually on the side of good in this film - at least as 'good' as a film this dark gets - and displays little of the cold violence we are used to seeing in his Frankenstein character. Thorley Walter is always good value and brings a touch of comic relief to the story. Susan Denberg and Robert Morris are successfully tragic as the doomed lovers, but kudos also goes to the trio of actors playing the bounders and cads who are the cause of all the violence in the first place. These fellows are totally obnoxious and yet believable. If you look closely you'll see a young Derek Fowlds in an early role.

The film's main disappoint is the lack of Frankenstein, but the story about the lovers holds the attention. Other disappointments are the way in which the main characters are murdered, all deaths are routinely staged and the censors are more to blame for this than anyone else. Also the main creation scene is also sadly missing from the finished print, let's face it we all love the bits where electricity sparks and lightning strikes and the monster comes to life, and it feels strangely left out here. The ending of the film is also anti-climatic in that it feels more than a little rushed. Still, all of the actors and actresses come out of this film looking good and it comes off as a nicely polished, well-rounded story which ties up neatly at the end and even achieves a kind of 'fairytale' ambiance.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Terrific Fisher Hammer
nfaust122 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
There's more going on in this little Hammer than meets the eye. The script reaches for something beyond the usual Frankenstein story, and Terence Fisher accommodates with keenly focused, at times inspired, direction. Start thinking about what is inferred when the soul of a boy, the son of a murderer, is transfered to the body of a crippled, deformed girl. The resulting action does not follow a clear and easy "good verses evil" scenario. Within the confines of a Hammer movie's melodrama, Fisher, a classical stylist and at times a superb artist, often created magic. This is one of those times. The performances are all equally compelling. Cushing gives the Baron more texture here than in any of the other films, I think. Thorley Walters is a good foil, and his befuddled affection and respect for the Baron makes some of this really rather touching. Arther Grant's photography has never been better. I urge viewers to watch the film with an open mine. This is not the usual horror film; it's more a fantasy, a fairy tale.
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Following your father to the gallows will certainly turn you into a monster!
mark.waltz5 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
As a little boy, Robert Morris saw his convicted criminal father executed on the gallows, and years later returns to the gallows as the associate of the resurrected Victor von Frankenstein (Peter Cushing), brought back to life himself before his soul left his body. In possession of Morris's head, Cushing uses it to resurrect the deceased Susan Denberg who, possessed by Morris's spirit, vows revenge and goes on a murdering spree. It's colorful and often slow-moving, moody and atmospheric, not overly gory but not overly memorable either.

The Hammer franchise of horror went on far too long, going a decade past this, and becoming far more sexual and bawdy than it perhaps needed to be. Cushing could play these types of roles in his sleep and instills sincerity in every character he plays. Morris is handsome and veril, Denborg sweet and alluring. The film finally takes off in the last 20 minutes and leaves the viewer on a roller coaster of horror that the previous 70 minutes seemed to lack. Compared to other Hammer movies that I've seen, this is sort of bland and I can't really rated higher than I did simply because of its gorgeous atmosphere.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Refreshingly-plotted fourth entry in the Hammer Frankenstein cycle.
barnabyrudge10 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
For their fourth Frankenstein movie, the folks at Hammer have come up with the novel (and cheaper) twist of having the doctor's latest creation presented as a beautiful, buxom female. No disfigured, staggering, stitched-together monster here.... just a blonde bombshell out on a jolly weekend killing spree! The series comprised of seven films in total, and in retrospect it's pretty clear that this is the most unique and unorthodox of the lot. Having said that, it would be inaccurate to say that it is one of the best. OK, the storyline may be more intriguing than usual, but there is still the problem that some of the "science" is decidedly silly, and at certain points the narrative slows down to a crawl.

Frankenstein (Peter Cushing) is busy experimenting with the idea of capturing a soul before it leaves the body of a dead person. He has calculated that souls do not leave at the exact moment of death, but stick around until over an hour later. Frankenstein is determined to "catch" a departing soul using a machine he has invented. He then hopes to store the captured soul until he can find a body to put it into! He gets his chance when one of his young associates, the simple-minded Hans (Robert Morris), is falsely accused of murder and sentenced to death at the guillotine. During the execution, Hans's lover Christina (Susan Denberg) is so overcome with grief that she throws herself into a nearby river and drowns. Frankenstein successfully captures Hans's soul as it leaves his decapitated corpse. He then transfers it into Christina's body. Trapped within this female body, Hans's soul still lives on, determined to exact revenge upon the trio of murderers who framed him for a killing that he did not commit....

On the whole, Frankenstein Created Woman is an enjoyable horror flick, but it very rarely generates genuine chills. There IS one gruesome sequence in which Christina keeps Hans's severed head in her room and converses with it about their next move (!) Apart from that, however, the film is relatively tame in terms of fear, gore and suspense. The pleasure comes instead from watching the cast do their thing, especially Cushing, who now sports streaks of grey hair at his temples that make his appearance more spine-tingling than ever. Also good are Thorley Walters as Cushing's befuddled sidekick, and Peter Blythe as Anton, the most despicable of the three unpleasant killers. The film's production values are pretty good, with an atmospheric laboratory setting, plus some other effective - if limited - interiors and exteriors. For fans of the Hammer style, this is a must.... but others will probably find sufficient charm and nostalgia on display to enjoy it too.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hammer Created Horror-Gold
The fourth film of Hammer's awesome Frankenstein series, legendary director Terence Fisher's "Frankenstein Created Woman" of 1967 is another creepy and excellent Hammer gem, and my personal favorite film in the series. Movies like this are reason enough to admire both Fisher as Hammer's most important director and leading man Peter Cushing as one of the greatest Horror icons in the history of motion pictures. Once again, Cushing stars as the ingenious and very unorthodox scientist Baron Victor Frankenstein, exceedingly dedicated to the acquisition of corpses for his eerie obsession of resurrecting the dead by means of rather macabre methods...

I will not give any parts of the plot away, but I can assure that Hammer fans will not be disappointed by this one. Mad science, disfigurement, body snatching, resurrection, insanity and an adequate amount of blood, suspense and eeriness, as well as some very humorous scenes, "Frankenstein Created Woman" has it all. The movie provides the typical eerie Hammer-style score and photography, and therefore maintains the creepy and great atmosphere Hammer-fans love to see. Peter Cushing's performance as the macabre Baron is excellent as always, and beautiful Susan Denberg was a great choice for the female lead. Thorley Walters furthermore fits very well in his role of Frankenstein's colleague in (mad) science, Doctor Herz. "Frankenstein Created Woman" is a brilliant Horror-gem that comes with my highest possible recommendations. Along with the dark and gruesome "Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell", this is my personal favorite of Hammer's Frankenstein series, and it also ranks among my Top 10 out of all Hammer films. This is pure Gothic Horror gold that no Horror fan could possibly afford to miss!
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In the Hammer mold, but a bit "off' compared to some of the classics
lemon_magic3 May 2013
I was glad to see in the opening credits that Terence Fisher was directing this effort...the man had an impressive string of successful and interesting films to his credit,many of them in the Hammer style. And Cushing is always worth watching. But somehow, this one didn't quite work as well for me. It wasn't bad, of course - Fisher doesn't make "bad" films. But the story didn't quite gel, and left me unsatisfied.

Of course, part of this dissatisfaction may be due to the 40+ year time span and the changes in standards and expectations in both cinema and society. As it is, I can see some of the themes being explored here - class, and sex, and oppression, and revenge, and role playing, and a bunch of other intriguing issues. I can respect that, but I think the Road Runner style ending (the movie just stops short about 2 minutes after the final act of vengeance) and the usual Hammer emphasis on sex and gore and shock kept the two aspects of the movie from landing on target the way a Hammer film usually does.

And of course, there's no Frankenstein "monster" AGAIN. Yes, I can see that the resurrected women plays the role, but I hate it when they have a Frankenstein movie without a bolt-necked, heavy browed freak of nature somewhere on the premises.

But I'm not sorry I bought the movie and I will keep it my collection, and who knows, I may enjoy it more on repeated viewings.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Minor But Atmospheric Hammer Frankenstein Picture
ShootingShark9 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
In a small village Hans is in love with the disfigured Christina. Meanwhile nearby, Baron Frankenstein is conducting some blasphemous research. When Hans is wrongly accused of murdering Christina's father and guillotined, she commits suicide and the Baron has two fresh bodies with which to experiment …

This isn't one of my favourite Hammer films, mostly because the revenge plot is pretty basic; obnoxious guys tease ugly woman, ugly woman kills herself, ugly woman gets reanimated and transformed into a beauty by mad scientist, now-beautiful woman uses her charms to exact bloodthirsty justice upon still-obnoxious guys. The most interesting idea is to what extent the creature is Christina or Hans, or both, but the film doesn't really explore this beyond a couple of throwaway lines. It's still a lot of fun though, with all the usual quality Hammer trappings (great period sets, rich colours, lots of creepy moments) and of course a stunning performance by Cushing, in his fourth outing as the dreadful evildoer. For me, Cushing is the definitive Frankenstein, by a long long chalk. He makes the man utterly cold and ruthless; he doesn't care about anybody or anything except his insane work, uses people to his own ends, has no scruples, is an intellectual snob and has no patience for anyone beneath him. Cushing uses every line and gesture to intimate this; an offhand flick through the Bible, endless put-downs of Walters and others, his use of gloves (he literally has no feelings), his constant piercing stare of dismissive superiority. He is Frankenstein. Compare him with say, the foppish performance by Kenneth Branagh in his 1994 production, and it's easy to see why Cushing was such a great actor and such an asset to Hammer films. Basic, but satisfying horror fare.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Great Horror Film From Director Terence Fisher
eibon0418 July 2000
Frankenstein Created Woman(1967) is the most complex and tragic of all the Hammer Frankenstein films. DR. Frankenstein in the film tries to figure out a way to beat death by the transference of the soul. Susan Denberg is excellent as the deformed turned avenging beauty named Christana. Terence Fisher's brilliant direction in this movie is enough to show that along with Mario Bava was one of the best Horror directors of the 1960's. The movie is about how ignorance can have an effect on an entire community. Frankenstein Created Woman(1967) is a thought provoking horror flick that ends on a depressing note.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Everything we don't understand is magic, until we understand it".
classicsoncall1 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In yet another twist on the Frankenstein mythos, the Baron (Peter Cushing) turns a disfigured character into a normal looking human being, while the brain transplant standard is replaced here by a soul transplant. It makes me wonder if James Brown might have been a fan.

The first thing I noticed when the Baron was removed from his self imposed cryogenic sleep was how easily his assistant Wertz (Thorley Walters) was able to move his frozen arms away from his chest. But at least the Baron redeemed himself with his latest theory, the idea that one's soul stays with the body for a time if suspended in a death like state. This all comes in handy when another of the Baron's aides is put to death for a murder he didn't commit. When Hans' (Robert Morris) execution by guillotine is witnessed by his girlfriend Christina (Susan Denberg), the distraught young woman commits suicide by drowning.

The whole soul transference business didn't make a lot of sense to me but it made for an interesting tale of revenge and murder on the part of the transformed Christina. She takes out the three dandies that ridiculed her and beat her father to death and did it in pretty elegant style if you consider the new look as a blonde bombshell she acquired along with the soul work over.

Well I guess none of it has to make any sense if you're a Horror film fan, and coming into this year's Halloween celebration, these flicks were all over the place. There are enough horror elements here for those who like to see blood, and for romance fans, this wouldn't be the first time a guy lost his head over a girl.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fourth Hammer Frankenstein.
AaronCapenBanner24 November 2013
Terence Fisher directed this fourth "Frankenstein" film in the Hammer series that sees Peter Cushing return as Baron Frankenstein, still experimenting with life, though now interested in the soul, and when it departs the body, which he recently experimented on himself with the help of his new assistant Dr. Hertz(played by Thorley Walters) His young helper Hans(played by Robert Morris) gets into trouble with the law and is hanged; his distraught girlfriend(played by Susan Denberg)whose father was the murder victim, drowns herself only to be resurrected by Frankenstein with the mind of Hans! Together(sort of) they set on a campaign of revenge against the real killers... Ambitious sequel is nicely directed and acted(if contrived), with the Baron in a mostly benevolent mood; pity it didn't last...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great idea slightly undone by a few silly twists
planktonrules8 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Of all the Peter Cushing Frankenstein films, this one is the most unusual. Instead of the usual grave robbing and sewing bits and pieces together to make a monster, this one chooses an entirely different path. Instead of experimenting on the dead, this film finds the doctor working on proving that the soul remains in the body after death. He establishes this by cryogenically suspending himself and having his assistants revive him. However, when his youngest assistant is framed for murder, the doctor experiments on whether he can preserve the man's soul after he is guillotined. Luckily, at about the same time, the condemned man's girlfriend drowns herself--thus providing a receptacle for the man's soul. So, in an odd twist, a dead man's soul is now embedded in a woman that Frankenstein revived from the dead.

Now at first, this dead lady has no idea who she is. To make it even more confusing, originally she'd been disfigured but when she was being revived the doctor also made her look beautiful--and very different. Now here is where the plot gets really interesting. The lady does recover her memories of the young executed man but she tells no one. That's because she plans to track down the three real murderers and exact her revenge.

This is a great idea and so far, this is one of the best movies in the series. However, now come the silly parts. First, oddly, the lady can both talk in her voice AND the voice of the dead man. Now she doesn't have his vocal chords but still it manages to sound exactly like him. Right. Second, she apparently is carrying around the head of the executed man. Despite being old and supposedly decayed, the guy's head looked pretty good--like he'd only been dead a day or so--not several weeks. If the film had just omitted these two silly bits, the film would have easily earned an 8 or 9. As it is, however, it seemed pretty silly starting at about 2/3 of the way through the film. Now the revenge angle was great--they just should have carried it off a bit better.

Overall, a decent film and one that even non-horror films probably will enjoy thanks to good acting and a few changes that make the film seem like not just another Frankenstein film.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cushing plays God in another fantastic Hammer film
Coventry7 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For the fourth time in approximately ten years, horror legend Peter Cushing gives image to the eerie Baron Victor Frankenstein. This chapter seems to be Hammer's take on the classic "Bride of Frankenstein" tale, although there's no real connection with the Universal classic or Mary Shelley's legendary tale. It does, however, guarantee a lot of entertainment, action and black comedy. The mighty Baron has retired to a small, deeply catholic town where he continues his ambitious experiments with the help of the local doctor and his servant. Frankenstein discovers that a man's soul continues to live even though flesh and tissue have died. So, if he could find a way to capture the soul and preserve it, he's able to transfer the essence of being into another body! The perfect occasion to test this suddenly occurs when the servant is falsely accused of murder and sentenced to the guillotine. When his girl then also takes her own life, Frankenstein immediately has a host body for the preserved soul. Naturally, things get a little out of hand and before he realizes it, our beloved Baron is wanted for witchery and blasphemy again! The story is amazingly grotesque and exaggerated but it nevertheless remains fascinating to see Peter Cushing play God. His overly sophisticated style and his "I'm better than you and I know it"-attitude are a joy to watch. It's intriguing to see Cushing's character develop over the series. He becomes more malevolent every sequel while his opponents only get dumber. There's a good dose of suspense, some really nice scenery (the guillotine close-ups!) and enough bloodshed to satisfy well-trained Hammer fans. This isn't Hammer's best film but certainly one of the most entertaining ones. They simply don't make 'em as cool as this anymore! Two more sequels followed as well as a sort of remake that didn't star Cushing (The Horror of Frankenstein)
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
She was ugly....ALL TWISTED!!!
EJBaggaley28 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The film 'Frankenstein created woman' is a film about a man named Hans (Robert Morris) who is wrongly accused of murder and is sentenced to death by Guillitine. After his execution a man named Dr.Baron Frankenstein (Peter Cushing) borrowed his body for an experiment, capturing his soul and transferring it into Hans girlfriends body - who of which drowned herself after Hans was executed. When (Christina Cleeve) she awoke with her new soul, she went out on a limb to track down the three men who were the real murderers and kill them.

This film is fantastic and superb in every way for its great plot, good acting and mysterious/dark atmosphere helped make this film into my favourite vengeance movie of all time. What I love mostly about this film was how cunning and devious Christina Cleeve was when she was seducing the three real murderers, who were responsible for Hans' death for her outstanding beauty and adulterous charm was so captivating it seemed like she was of the devil. Another scene I quite admired that contributed towards the spookiness of this film was when Christina was talking to Hans' cut-off head in her bedroom and taking verbal orders from it on who she should kill next. There were, however, certain aspects in this film I didn't fully understand. When Hans was in court being charged with murder, why didn't he use his girlfriend Christina as an alibi for she was with him when the victim was murdered; Was it because he was embarrassed for people to know that he was acquainted with her (as she was deformed and twisted at the time) or some other reason. What ever reason it was, I'm sure it wasn't worth being executed for. Another bit I didn't understand was how Christina Cleeve knew who the real murderers were when she awoke with Hans' soul because Hans never knew who they were. Anyway, if you haven't seen this film, do watch it, for its an outstanding production and if you like 'Terence Fisher' films, you'll definitely like this one.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great Hammer Frankenstein movie with a wild concept
mwilson197614 December 2019
Peter Cushing returns as Baron Frankenstein in the fourth and possibly strongest of Hammers Frankenstein movies. Directed by Terence Fisher, it sees Susan Denberg killing herself after seeing her lover unjustly framed for murder and guillotined. She is resurrected by the Baron and his assistant (played by Thorley Walters), with her lover's soul in her, and sets off to avenge his death. Hammer went for something different here, the focus being on the metaphysical dimensions of Frankenstein's work as opposed to the physical, such as the question of the soul, and its relationship to the body. Critics seemed to hate it, but it has an army of fans including Martin Scorsese, who picked the movie as part of a 1987 National Film Theatre season of his favourite films. Released the same year as Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band and the Summer of Love, this movie has some very far out notions upon which its plot hangs, yet it never descends into campiness or melodrama, and is just a great Peter Cushing Frankenstein film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
One of my least favorites
mhorg201817 August 2018
While the cast is good, I've always found the story, about soul switching, to be lacking. For one thing, does the mind reside in the soul? Or is it a separate entity? That is a question for another day. This movie doesn't have a 'real' monster, just human looking ones seeking out vengeance. For me, one of the lesser entries.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An example of ambitious done excellently
TheLittleSongbird24 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Not the best of the series, I do put Curse of Frankenstein, Revenge of Frankenstein and Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed above it, but it is much better than Evil of Frankenstein and Horror of Frankenstein(both of which are from personal opinion among Hammer House of Horror's weakest).

Frankenstein Created Woman does take time to get going, like Evil and Horror except not as badly(Created Woman's story is actually interesting). More could have been done with Anton's death scene which is too brief and lacking in tension(again personal opinion), considering that out of the three men he's the one you hate the most.

Frankenstein Created Woman is well made though, not as much as Curse, Revenge and Destroyed but the photography is top notch, having a beautifully dream-like and deliciously macabre quality to it(especially the shots of the guillotine, they gave me chills), the costumes are sumptuous and the sets do give off the appropriate Gothic atmosphere. Some say that it looks skimpier compared to Curse, Revenge and Destroyed, others will argue that it matches the grimmer tone compared to the other Hammer Frankenstein films, this viewer belongs in the latter camp. Terence Fisher shows that he is more than up to the job, it's a taut directing job that shows a mastery of mood and atmosphere with striking visuals to match, while the music score is appropriately eerie.

The script explores several different elements(including psychological horror, sensuality, fear presented in a fairy-tale-like way and humour) and actually balances them very neatly. that was refreshing after seeing too many films with scripts and plots that try to do too much and come over as under-explained and muddled. The humour is very witty too, did get a good laugh at Frankenstein's very short and blunt answer to "Do you expect us to believe this childish rubbish, sir? Do you take us for fools?". The story is the most ambitious of the Hammer Frankensteins and is very different for them, the soul transference a really interesting concept and it was done more than adequately, though even more maybe could have been done with it. Even with the slow start, the story is always engaging and has enough suspense and excitement to keep one engrossed(the beginning is remarkably powerful and Christina's conversing with Hans's severed head is one Hammer's most chilling scenes), sure it does get very daft in places and has logic lapses galore but that is not unusual for Hammer and it's part of the charm.

The characters carry the film very well, it is easy to feel sympathy for Christina and Hans and feel repulsion for Anton, Karl and Johann. Frankenstein as ever is entertaining and while he's clearly "evil" he does show a sympathetic side too. Peter Cushing is terrific as he always was as the definitive interpretation of the Baron and Thorley Walters gives amusing and sympathetic support. Of the supporting cast, faring the best were Susan Denberg who is a creepy and poignant(not to mention sexy) Christina and Peter Blythe who is chillingly vile as Anton. Robert Morris is movingly engaging as Hans, and while Johann is a very atypical role for Derek Fowlds he does do very well with the character. All in all, a solid as rocks fourth entry of the Hammer Frankenstein series and an example of being ambitious paying off. 8/10 Bethany Cox
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Above-average entry in the series
kannibalcorpsegrinder3 November 2015
Attempting to continue his experiments, the Baron finds that the opportunity to transfer the soul of a young man into a recently-deceased young woman instead sets her out to avenge the group who framed him for death and causing him to try to stop her.

Overall this one was quite decent if slightly flawed. Among the finer points here are the rather fun experiments being conducted for there's plenty of time here working in the lab to complete matters fully throughout here. The opening attempts to bring him back to life from being in the freezer is quite nice by setting up the later work here with the soul that comprises the middle here where he begins going through the different resources possible for his contraptions here to bring that along even further along with the actual transference procedure where they bring about the change-over here of having the two changing his soul into their equipment and then into the girl for another really enjoyable sequence. The later scenes here of them getting her through the recovery process which includes the walking around learning to how to walk and the gratification of the changes made to her appearance due to the change as well as the return to the guillotine which brings about the shock of the opening death of the father there which is all quite fun here. The revenge part here is even better with the person talking in voices and switching into the other voice here to signify the changes as the tense stalking in the pub and out into the countryside as she goes after the last one on the picnic in the woods here so there's a rather fine series of kills in here. These here give this one enough to like overall that it holds off the few flaws within. The main issue here is that there's so little actual horror in here that it can feel very dull at times with the film really holding back how quickly paced this really could've been as a lot of what happens isn't too scary. The majority of time here isn't all that scary here with the continued ramifications of his father's past connecting with his own future from all the townspeople, their budding romance and another instance where the villagers are indeed afraid of the Baron through his reputation but aren't capable of doing anything about it here which in itself is yet another big flaw here as all of these here found throughout the first half just don't make this into much of a horror film. These here are just so bland that, though they do serve as the cause of the revenge later on, it just drags on for quite a while here taking it's time with the overloading these points that becomes very bland overall, and is one of the biggest issues here. Once again, the distrustful natives isn't too original being here, while the other big flaw here is the really abrupt ending which is such a sadden stop that it's hard to believe nothing more involved wasn't used here as it seems to be mere seconds after the revenge is taken that there's the chase and then the ending which for once could've used some stretching out here to really take advantage of what's going on. Otherwise, this one is a lot of fun.

Today's Rating/PG-13: Violence and the aftermath of a sexual encounter.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
They just keep getting worse.
13Funbags13 September 2018
This series of films is bad on an epic scale and this is the worst so far. This time the majority of the movie takes place in a restaurant where no one ever pays for anything. It's mind numbingly boring and quite confusing. This series is obsessed with guillotines and pronouncing it wrong. What is wrong with these people? They tried to get all complicated and deep but just ended up with 90 minutes of boring plot holes.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed