User Reviews

It is very hard to like Henry Fonda's character as the pacifists antihero which is the role he is playing as a lawyer named Mayor Will Blue in the tumbleweed town called Hard Times. Watching how the seasoned tough guy actor Aldo Ray play the bully/rapist overpower the entire townsfolk as a one man out of control mob, how could anyone like the "character: Mayor Will Blue who refuses to confront the mean SOB who is terrorizing his small town.

Just a few years later in 1973 Clint Eastwood played another antihero stranger without a given name in the classic film "High Plains Drifter" with the audience accepting much greater empathy when the town was also burned to the ground and Clint went after the bad guys with a vengeance. I understand why many viewers did not enjoy this Burt Kennedy directed film, and I am sure director/actor Clint Eastwood learned from the mistakes from Henry Fonda's 1967 film Welcome to Hard Times.

My one criticism of this film was the fact that there seemed to be only one young boy in the entire town and how can any town flourish without a school and a church? Very few westerns are acknowledged as classics without a make believe town having school aged children, a church as well as the always standard livery stable.

Even without the bare necessities of a small western start up town I still liked and understood the message which is that one way or another, bully's have to be confronted and ultimately defeated even if it means the sacrifice of a few good men to save the lives and livelihood of many.

I give the film a decent 7 out of 10 IMDB rating.

There are a lot of interesting aspects to this above average adult western -- Fonda plays a wimp, Keenan Wynn plays a pimp who operates out of a bible tent, and Ray plays a "badman" who seems to have no motive for his destruction of the town of "Hard Times" (they could've picked a better name, eh?) than pure sadism. In Fonda's quest to prove his manhood and make a stand in Hard Times, a lot of fairly complex human themes come to the fore. Rule plays a believably highstrung Western Woman, bent on teaching her adopted son how to kill because she doesn't think Fonda has the guts.

One of Kennedy's better later westerns before he switched completely to the comedic mode, notable for a solid script based on an interesting story with great character performances throughout.

Dramatic and decent Western magnetically performed by Henry Fonda as main cast and just look at the extraordinary support casting . A town can be killed by a bullet , just like a man! . Welcome indeed to this weird Western dealing with a little town determined to become modern , there are stores as hardware , livery stable , undertaking and saloon . A sociopathic stranger (vicious as well as marvelously wicked Aldo Ray) takes advantage of the frightened townspeople and burns down the saloon , destroys the small hardscrabble village but the 'mayor' Will Blue (Henry Fonda , his role mentions he is 49 years old at one point and turning 50 at another and yet Fonda was well over 60 at the time of the filming) doesn't stand up to crazed murderous . After that , Blue convinces its survivors to stay and rebuild it . As Blue swears to rebuild the small Western town after the stranger rides on , but the townsfolk give up and abandon . Afraid for the city's future and even more afraid of the fact that the maniacal Pistolero seeks revenge , Blue , then , promises to make a new town . A wagon load of whores led by "entrepeneur" Zar (Keenan Wynn) shows up and together with Blue, and Maple (John Anderson) they rebuild the little town . All of them decide that old-style violence is the only way to rid themselves of the angry diabolic gunman . As Will has to take a last stand when the powerful gunslinger take over his town , again . What happens in the ending makes one of the most dramatic climaxes of any story you've ever seen!

This passable , meaty Western contains interesting plot , intrigue , thrills , shootouts and results to be quite entertaining , though slow moving . It is a riveting mixture of the psychological flick and the basic Western action pic . Well-paced as well as rare Western balances action , suspense and symbol-laden drama . It's a classical recounting about a veteran as well as hesitant leading citizen of the runtown of ¨Hard Times¨ who at first doesn't stand-up to ruthless killer , a peace-loving and surrounded by cowards and frightening people ; being probably one of the strangest Western of the sixties . This is an atypical but thought-provoking western with a lot of reflection , distinguished moments and dramatical attitudes , in addition a multitude of enjoyable situations . The picture profits Henry Fonda's portentous interpretation , he gives a top-drawer performance as a Mayor who fails to stand up to the gunfighter , Fonda is an awesome expert in the art of conjuring sensational , terrific acting . Originally made for television in 1966, but released to theaters instead, before being shown on TV because of its violent content . Engaging screenplay from the novel "Welcome to Hard Times" by E.L. Doctorow , author of ¨Ragtime¨ . The traditional story and exciting script was well screen-written by Burt Kennedy though clichés run through-out , the agreeable tale is enhanced for interesting moments developed among main characters and especially on the relationship between Henry Fonda and Janice Rule . The highlights of the film are the climatic showdowns , the peculiar love story among protagonists , and , of course , the final gundown . The casting is frankly nice . Here are reunited a top-notch plethora of secondary actors , most of them playing the frightened townspeople as Keenan Wynn , Janis Paige , John Anderson , Warren Oates , Fay Spain , Edgar Buchanan , Paul Fix , Denver Pyle , Lon Chaney Jr. and Royal Dano who is exactly right as Indian medicine man . Atmospheric cinematography in Technicolor is superbly caught by cameraman Harry Stradling . Thrilling as well as atmospheric musical score by Harry Suckman .

This hard Western picture was professionally directed by Burt Kennedy . He initially was screenwriter , his initial effort, ¨Seven men from now¨ (1956), was a superb western, the first of the esteemed collaboration between director Budd Boetticher and star Randolph Scott . Kennedy wrote most of that series, as well as a number of others for Batjac, although it would be nearly 20 years before Wayne actually appeared in the film of a Kennedy script . In 1960 Kennedy got his first work as a filmmaker on a western , ¨The Canadians¨ (1961) , but it was a critical failure . He turned to television where he wrote and directed episodes of "Lawman" (1958), "The Virginian " (1962) and most notably ¨Combat!"(1962) . He returned to films in 1965 with the successful ¨The Canadians¨ (1965), directing the pilot for the TV series of the same name and subsequently made ¨Support your local gunfighter¨, ¨Support you local sheriff¨ that resulted to be two of his best Western . And directed two with John Wayne : ¨Train robbers¨ and ¨The war wagon¨ , Robert Mitchum : ¨Pistolero¨ , ¨The good guys and the bad guys¨ , Frank Sinatra : ¨Dirty Dingus Magee¨ , Raquel Weich : ¨Hannie Coulder¨ and a sequel ¨Return of the magnificent seven¨ . His last films were TV products and mediocre productions such as : ¨Wild wild west revisited¨, ¨More wild wild west¨, ¨Big bad John¨, ¨Dynamite and gold¨¨ , ¨The trouble with spies¨and ¨Suburban commandos¨ . This violent Western ¨Welcome to Hard Times¨ is a Henry Fonda vehicle , if you like his particular performance ,you'll enjoy this one .

This is a gritty and well directed film. Unfortunately, the entire premises strains belief. We are supposed to believe that one man rides into a town and kills people and burns it to the ground while everybody just sits around and watches. In the real world this guy (Aldo Ray) would have been shot down about five minutes after he walked into the saloon. In 19th century America, everyone was armed and would have taken any action needed to protect their lives and property. I thought it was a silly movie when I saw it as a child and it remains silly today.

This is a great Henry Fonda film from 1967 where Fonda plays the role as Mayor Will Blue who is a peace abiding man and hates to use his fists or a weapon against anyone. One day a man visits his town and takes over the entire town, raping women and burning the entire town to the ground. Mayor Will Blue is not very well liked by his town folk, however, he still wants to remain in what is left of his town and refuses to runaway like he has done in his past life. Molly Riordan,(Janice Rule) becomes rather close to Will Blue and also Keenan Wynn, (Zar, Whiskey & Girls) visits the town and opens up a Saloon for prostitutes and booze. Lon Chaney Jr. and Elisha Cook Jr., "I Wake Up Screaming" make very brief appearances in this film but give great supporting roles. This is a great Henry Fonda film which he made when he reached the age of 60 years and was beginning to find very few roles on the Silver Screen and then decided to perform on the Broadway Stage in New York City. Enjoy.

A struggling small town in the late 1800's is invaded by a psychopathic gunman. Nobody is willing to stand up to him, therefore he has his way and rides off. New residents come and re-build, only to find the man returns. The townspeople must either have the courage to face him or perish. Excellent western dealing with injustice and the unwillingness to resolve it.

Burt Kennedy who made so many good comic westerns back in the day, tried his hand at a serious realistic western and fell flat on his face with it. Henry Fonda must have felt like Tyrone Power in Nightmare Alley, he and the film got great critical reviews and the public stayed away in droves.

No accident, western fans expect certain things in their films and Welcome to Hard Times delivers none of them. It is a realistic depiction of the growth of a western town, maybe too realistic.

Henry Fonda is the mayor of this little burg and purportedly the hero of the piece. Problem is that there is nothing heroic about Fonda nor the town's people.

Aldo Ray is the silent Man from Bodie, the villain of the story. He's about the worst villain on screen since Liberty Valance, without any redeeming characteristics. He defiles some of the women, shoots some of the men, and sets fire to the town. A few including Henry Fonda try to stop him and fail. Fonda fails in a moment of weakness.

Fonda's girl friend Janice Rule is among the defiled and she grows understandably bitter. The main story line is the conflict between Rule and Fonda, especially over young Michael Shea whose father was killed by Aldo Ray and who Fonda has now taken over raising.

Some veteran players like Keenan Wynn, Warren Oates, Denver Pyle, Edgar Buchanan, and Lon Chaney, Jr., make things interesting as the story drags on. There is of course a final and very bloody confrontation again with Aldo Ray that has some unexpected consequences.

Somebody should have told the town of Hard Times what the town in Johnny Concho did about William Conrad who was in the Aldo Ray role in that film. The solution to the problems of Hard Times was right there.

this is one of the lousiest movies i've ever seen.The only reason i kept watching this is because i was trying to understand why H.Fonda was in this movie.It seems to be trying to promote pacifism but its so stupidly done that it actually manages the complete opposite,the viewer is convinced by the end of this movie that guns and violence are absolutely necessary.Fonda's character doesn't make any sense other than he is a total spineless coward.There is absolutely no rational excuse for his actions.The whole story is supposed to convince the viewer that Fonda's character is right,but there is very little argument in favor of a man who just sits around doing nothing to stop evil because he is afraid. Seems to me Fonda had played too many heroes before this and tried something different without thinking if it made any sense. Lousy and pointless movie.

One of the most unusual (and best) westerns ever made! Fonda's "cowardly" character is much closer to real life than the invulnerable and invincible Clint Eastwood characters of about the same time. I first saw this as a teenager, and it immediately became one of my 10 favorite films of all time. Still is. I sure wish I could get a copy.

I've seen this film several times and have found it interesting, probably because it's not a typical western with a cookie-cutter western town and a good vs. evil conflict where the "good" (e.g., a US marshal, homesteaders) triumphs in the end over the "evil" (often greedy ranchers or railroad men). Reviewers on this site have misunderstood this film's "message" as a plea for non-violence and pacifism. Just because "Young Mr. Lincoln" Henry Fonda is the protagonist in this film doesn't mean the filmmakers are viewing his actions and words in a favorable light. I see the conflicted and cowardly Fonda character ("Blue") as more of an anti-hero in a similar fashion to the morally ambivalent "good" guys in film noir. The bad guy in this film, who twice terrorizes the town, is a truly malevolent force of nature and "Mayor Blue" as his adversary is a deeply flawed individual who is hesitant and non-confrontational. Now I admit that there are some scenes near the end that don't seem to "ring true," but our anti-hero at the end does seem to save the town even if in an indirect and hesitant way. There's no plea for non-resistance in this film; the filmmakers acknowledge in an indirect way that evil must be resisted, but they just happen to show its vanquishment at the hands of a flawed, hesitant and not particularly courageous individual.

I have to say that I loved the location that the film used for its setting of the hard scrabble town in the film's title. It looked like a truly God-forsaken place on the treeless high plains at the economic mercy of a distant mining camp and the camp's volatile payroll schedule. It was natural, therefore, that the town's few settlers were an interesting bunch of drifters and socially alienated individuals. Who else would want to settle there?

It's amazing that Henry Fonda made the fantastic "Once Upon a Time in the West" the same year, or thereabouts, that he made this atrocity. Tonally inept, directed like a school play, with an obnoxious, heavy-handed score, this is an object lesson in how not to make a western. As you probably know by now, an impossibly brutal killer terrorizes a small town but no one has the courage to stand up to him. You'd think they could hand out a few guns and encircle the guy, instead of taking him on one at a time. Various central-casting western types cycle through, brandishing their mustaches and petticoats, and seem to have been left to their own devices on such matters as line readings (Keenan Wynn, in particular, barks his dialog as though dictating it to a sign painter). Ersatz Aaron Copeland music kicks up for interminable montages of town-building. Henry Fonda and Janice Rule have the same argument for two hours until, mercifully, some bloodshed makes the conversation moot. You will mourn the two hours of your life you sacrificed on the altar of this inert flick.

Could "Welcome to Hard Times" be the most bizarre western ever made? It's certainly the most bizarre western Burt Kennedy has ever been associated with, (he wrote and directed it). Unusually violent and clearly influenced by the Spaghetti Westerns and not dissimilar at times to Clint Eastwood's "Pale Rider" it's about crazed psychopath Aldo Ray's terrorizing and destruction of the small town of Hard Times. (well, more a couple of buildings calling itself a town), in which Henry Fonda is the mayor who refuses to stand up to him, (there doesn't appear to be a sheriff).

After Ray rides out, leaving very little behind but ashes, Fonda persuades the survivors to rebuild the town, welcoming any newcomers who come riding by and then...you don't have to be too smart to figure what's coming. It's certainly got a sterling cast; as well as Fonda and Ray there's Janice Rule, Janis Paige, Keenan Wynn, Lon Chaney Jr., Warren Oates and Fay Spain and Kennedy's screenplay, from E. L. Doctorow's first novel, is so off-the-wall it's impossible to dismiss it. In fact, if any western from the sixties, or indeed from any period, deserves a cult following it's this one. Is it any good? Of course not but you certainly won't see another one quite like it.

I'm amazed at the many reviewers here who tried in vain to attach their nonsensical "liberals are bad" political views to this movie. Totally off-base. Likewise the various gun nuts who have chimed in and claimed that in the Wild West, "everybody carried guns" and would have dealt with the bad guy in "the right way" -- meaning, by murdering him any way they could. Again, no -- not even close.

America was built by hard work and perseverance, mostly by people who never saw, never needed, and never used, a gun as anything other than a necessary tool. The idea that what "made America great" was the willingness of Americans to shoot each other, is so profoundly stupid that it's mind-boggling that people still believe it--despite the obvious fact that no living person has ever seen or heard of "kill all the bad guys" ever being used anywhere on earth as a way of developing a society of peaceful, lawful citizens. No one ever created peace by being violent.

Such is the attempted message of this film -- if violence is used as a tool, it will be applied equally to both the "bad guys" and the "good guys" and you'll be no better off in the long run. It's a good message; too bad the "story" is told in such a clumsy, slow-paced and confusing way.

Keeping in mind that the film was made in 1967, when SO many acts of senseless violence were occurring in America's cities and in the jungles of Southeast Asia, it makes sense that movies of the time would try to make the point that nothing ever comes from the use of violence except the escalation of violence. Henry Fonda's character represents all of us who look at the world's problems and simply don't know what to do -- we just know that in order to create a peaceful world, using violence has never worked yet. This movie tries to get us to think about that -- too bad its comically bad elements are such a distraction.

One thing about Henry: he was versatile. From dottering old Norman Thayer in "On Golden Pond" to the child-murdering gunman in "Once Upon a Time in the West" and everything in between, Henry Fonda showed us his multi-faceted talent over and over again, as he does here as a waffling, semi-cowardly man initially unwilling to confront a bully that terrorizes a small community in the old west.

Aldo Ray's is ideally suited for his character as well, as the murderous brute intent upon destroying a small town and anyone who tries to stop him.

As usual, mild-mannered Good eventually triumphs over seemingly unstoppable Evil, but then, by 1967 Clint Eastwood already had a lock on the other outcome. Still, I enjoyed it quite a lot, and recommend it highly, for among other reasons, to see Aldo munch on a giant green onion as he drinks coffee, in celebration of a murderous rampage he just finished.

Awful dusters like this are the key reason so many people hate the genre. It's the cheapest pulp imaginable ... manna for the addicted, but utterly unpalatable for the rest of us who expect intelligent story-telling in whatever kind of movie we may choose to watch. In this tiny town -- and really that's being charitable; hamlet is more appropriate -- there are but a handful of inhabitants and only three apparent businesses (saloon, store, and undertaker), no court or jail, no regular transportation services, no communications, no government offices of any kind, no mayor, and no law enforcement, yet a busily occupied lawyer? The citizens - despite possessing a good cache of weapons - come out to the street and stand around helplessly as a drunken psychopath goes on a slow and relaxed killing rampage interspersed with ample rest periods and ample opportunities for him to be ambushed. If you have an IQ in three digits and expect a plausible story, don't waste even a moment of your time on this piece of rubbish.

I love Westerns. I have watched dozens of them and I continue to watch every one that comes on that I haven't seen. (Thanks to the IMDb 'My Movies' I can set them up and get alerted to them coming on, a very nice feature.) This has to be the all-time worst Western I have ever seen.

The townspeople in this movie are the direct ancestors of the families in the home security system ads, where they put a night stand up against the bedroom door and are talking to the security guy on the phone. "Is everything all right?" "No, there is a man coming up the stairs who wants to kill us all." "Don't worry, I'm calling the police right away." Whew! Close one! And how preferable it is to have the police arrive in ten minutes, with a killer ten seconds away, than to have any means of actually defending oneself. Right? It is THAT level of self-imposed helplessness that afflicts the people of the town in this movie. They stand by, afraid to do anything for fear that it might be wrong. And you can bet, if they DO do anything, it WILL be wrong, so best not to ever defend yourself or try and stop a bad guy. Just cower and hope he won't make it hurt too much for too long.

As another reviewer said, in the old West, any idiot who tried to do what 'the bad man' did in this movie would find himself dead in side of five minutes, because back then, people stood up for and defended their family and property and town. They did not stand by in horror, clutching a copy of Consumer Reports and watching as the women were raped and the town was burned. The person who wrote this trash movie has no clue what this country used to be about. The 'bad man' would have been the 'dead man' in no time, and a person as wimpy as the mayor played here by Fonda would have been disgraced and yanked out of office pronto.

This whole movie is written from the viewpoint that bad people will eventually stop being bad if we let them tire themselves out beating us up, so we should not do anything about them. It is not realistic, it is not dramatic, it is not riveting, it is not honest. It is a complete frantic fantasy from the viewpoint of a clueless, modern-day political liberal, plain and simple.

I can almost forgive Henry Fonda for appearing in this cow plop of a movie because his role in 'Once Upon A Time In The West' was so powerful. Here, he is nothing but a complete power failure.

Someone commented that Fonda's character was much more realistic than the type played by say Clint Eastwood. I totally disagree. Perhaps there is nobody as-such we can point to from history who was exactly what Eastwood portrayed, but look at the famous sheriffs and marshals and gunfights and bad guys who are well-recorded in history. Where are the pacifist hand-wringers? History did not note them, because they were nothing that anyone would want to remember. They died as ineffectual cowards, and their only legacy was the shame of being too afraid to stand up for themselves against the power of bad.

The 'bad man', riding through town, doing crazy things and cackling and laughing the whole time, is one of the most bizarre and totally unrealistic characters I have ever seen in a movie, let alone one around whom the story is supposed to revolve. Can this be a serious attempt at a Western movie? It is a sad, pathetic joke of a movie, designed to push a pacifist viewpoint from the perspective of someone who knows more about tofu than about the old West.

I hate this movie. Have I made that fact clear? This movie is GARBAGE. Thank you and good night.