Skullduggery (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
An honourable, well-meaning premise that simply doesn't hang together as a film.
barnabyrudge20 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Skullduggery is a strange, strange film based on the novel "Ye Shall Know Them" by Vercors. To unleash criticism at the film feels really unkind, since it is a movie that deals with earnest themes like humanity, and pleas for upright moral standards and tolerance. But in spite of its honourable intentions and its well-meaning tone, Skullduggery simply isn't a very good film. For me, the main problem is the terribly disjointed narrative which can't make its mind up how best to convey its message. The first half of the movie is like watching a standard jungle expedition flick of the Tarzan ilk; later it teeters into sci-fi fable; by the end it slips into courtroom melodramatics. The differences in tone between each section of the movie are too great, too jarring, to overlook. They stick out like a sore thumb and remind you constantly that you're watching a muddled, disorganised movie.

An archaeological expedition into the jungles of New Guinea is led by adventurer Douglas Temple (Burt Reynolds). One of the main archaeologists involved in the excursion is attractive lady scientist Dr Sybil Greame (Susan Clark). After an arduous trek they stumble upon a tribe of strange ape-like creatures. These primitive, long-lost people are covered in hair and have survived for centuries without being in any way touched or influenced by the developments of modern man. There is some evidence that they may the ancestors of early man – the "missing link" in the evolution of apes into humans. Or perhaps a race of humans who simply look and behave differently from usual? Or even a race of animals that have begun to develop human characteristics? The archaeologists call the tribe "the Tropi" and are initially thrilled by the implications of their discovery. But things take a devastating turn when nasty opportunist Vancruysen (Paul Hubschmid) declares his intention to exploit the tribe and their idyll on behalf of developers. He questions whether the Tropi are truly "human" and takes his argument to the courts, where he hopes to be granted legal backing so that his own greedy ambitions can be continued.

This was a very early film in Reynolds' career, and he actually unbalances this movie by acting like he's in a comedy while the rest of the cast take it all very seriously. Not that Reynolds can be blamed – he has an impossible role, asked to play a charming adventurer who really belongs in a Tarzan flick. His character and the film are not relevant to each other. Clark fares much better as the earnest lady archaeologist, and there are nice supporting roles for British actors Edward Fox, Alexander Knox and Wilfrid Hyde-White. A major shortcoming in Skullduggery is the lame and ineffective make-up used to give the Tropi their strange hairy appearance. Rather than making the actors look like believable hominoids, the stuck-on hair merely makes them look unintentionally comical…. and that's just not the right idea. We're meant to feel great sympathy for these creatures, but that's awfully hard when they look so unconvincing. Skullduggery is a failed attempt to tell a story that could have been poignant, philosophical and stimulating. The honourable intentions are there for all to see, but the end result doesn't do them justice. A worthy failure it might be but a failure nonetheless.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Burt and Susan sparkle together, and the panoramic scenery is beautiful
Ed-Shullivan13 January 2023
The cinematography in Technicolor has always appealed to me and scenes such as the tribal women rowing their four (4) large canoes with the archaelogical safari team and their supplies down the New Guinea river(s) infested with killer native tribes, snakes, and crocodiles, injects the needed adventure and to stamp this movie as a bona fide thriller.

Burt Reynolds and Susan Clark are excellent choices as the two male and female leads who both have romantic inclinations but for very different reasons. The audience is asked to form their own opinion on what their discovery of the Tropi tribe means to the human race.

As with many of the world controversies regarding racism, evolution, slavery, and the industrial revolution, the film Skullduggery will leave you with some questions as to what is fair and what is right when a new discovery such as the Tropi tribe is uncovered.

Skullduggery (1970) starts off as a combination of adventure with some light humor and a romantic twist thrown in for good measure, but it was not how I expected the film to transpire as I had been impressed by Burt Reynolds performance in the later (1972) film Deliverance. Not to say I was disappointed in the film Skullduggery, as I was not. I really enjoy scenic pictures of far away corners of the world, and the directors Gordon Douglas and Richard Wilson captured the landscape of New Guinea with crisp and clean panoramic views of the green forests, huge mountains, and seedy crocodile infested waters.

I enjoyed Skullduggery and will most likely watch it again in a few years. This review is somewhat of a personal reminder to confirm a thumbs up review which I give a 6 out of 10 IMDb rating.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Burt Reynolds Shows Promise For More Important Roles
slightlymad222 March 2015
Continuing my plan to watch every Burt Reynolds movie in his filmography in order, I come to Skullduggery.

Plot In A Paragraph: Douglas Temple (a likable Burt Reynolds) manages to wrangle his way on to a jungle expedition in New Guinea when anthologist Sybil Greame (Susan Clarke) lands in his territory. While she searches for old bones, he searches for phosphor (which is used in the "new" colour TV's) they not only discover both, but a whole lot more.

I'm amazed by what I read on here sometimes, as some of the people rating this movie 2/10 or worse 1/10 clearly just didn't get it. Even if it was made today this movie would still ring true.

Burt Reynolds is incredibly likable and shows great promise for more important roles. However "Skullduggery" winds up a bit of a mismatch due to an inconsistent mix of humour and human drama. That's down to bad editing and poor direction.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just a poor shadow of the original film
Jeepster677 August 2001
I must have unknowingly been in the test audience for the original version of this film at a local drive-in theater in 1970. I recently saw the current version on TV again, and was shocked at the mutilation of the original plot. The movie I remember was longer and the missing scenes and dialogue comprised a biting satire of race relations that still resonates in my memory today. The present version of the film has sadly had the best scenes and lines excised out, in the name of avoiding controversy in 1970.

We have come a long way since then. This film was far more entertaining in it's original form, and deserves re-release in a Special Edition or Director's cut DVD!
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A weird one!
BandSAboutMovies9 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Les animaux dénaturés was written by Jean Bruller under his pseudonym Vercors and it was printed in English under the titles You Shall Know Them, The Murder of the Missing Link and Borderline. One imagines that producer Saul David and 20th Century Fox were looking for another ape-related story after the success of their last simian-centric adaption of a French novel. That would be La Planète des Singes. And the movie would be Planet of the Apes.

David replaced original director Richard Wilson and brought in In Like Flint - and Viva Knievel! - director Gordon Douglas, who was not well-thought of by star Burt Reynolds, who turned down M*A*S*H* for this movie! Burt would tell Roger Ebert that the movie had a good script, continuing "The guy's a good writer, Lorenzo Semple Jr. Badly directed, kind of sloughed off. Susan Clark was good; she's a good actress. But nobody knew how to sell the picture. Any time you have Pat Suzuki dressed as a small ape, I think you're in trouble."

During an expedition to Papua New Guinea, Clark and Reynolds discover a tribe of ape-like people, called the Tropis. They may be the missing link, but no one will know if they are human or animal. The only way to know the truth is if someone knocks one of them up, which if they don't have a child means that it's just bestiality. And if they have a kid, well, evolution is going to get a lot weirder.

Anyways, one of the Tropis gets murdered - actually a whole bunch of them get barbecued and chowed down upon at one point - leading to a murder trial, so this is one of the few courtroom science fiction ape movies not called Planet of the Apess or Escape from the Planet of the Apes movies to have a court scene. Man, maybe apes lend themselves to legal drama, what with that whole Scopes trial.

But do those movies have Blacula, William Marshall, as the attorney general?

I love that Burt Reynolds is in this, just gamely playing along. I'm sure he was having the time of his life.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bad Mix
Tweetienator8 August 2022
The first half of the movie tastes like a remake of a jungle expedition in one of those old Tarzan classics starring Weissmuller, the second half tries to be something like a class in philosophy - what makes a human human etc. Sadly, despite a good cast and production both parts never really blend well together. The first part was entertaining to me, a simple but fun adventure movie, the second part was a rather boring affair to me - an attempt to make something significant but not really engaging, and in the context of the first half (adventure, romance) it just feels too much out of tune.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poppa Jack?
coelacanth193831 December 2006
Once upon a time there was a science fiction author named H. Beam Piper who wrote a classic book named "Little Fuzzy" which was about a man discovering a race of adorable little fuzzy humanoids on another planet. Mr. Piper died in 1964, but Hollywood and many of today's authors starting looting his grave before his cadaver got cold. This is the book where they got the idea for Ewoks from.

Skullduggery is such a blatant ripoff of "Little Fuzzy" I can wonder why I'm the only who's ever noticed?

But don't take my word for it. Here's a link to Project Guntenberg where you can download a copy of "Little Fuzzy" for free: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18137
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jolly good little adventure
wozcom31 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
(Maybe some teeny spoilers)... A rollicking tale as anthropologists searching for signs of a "Missing Link" in New Guinea, discover a living group of them amidst the jungle. The expedition's villainous financier (Paul Hubschmid), upon discovering Phosphorus in the area, puts the little creatures to work as miners.

The film's ending court case regards the "humanity" of a child stillborn to one of the lead creatures, the alleged result of an indiscretion by Burt Reynolds.

Great cast includes appearances from Ausie great Chips Rafferty, Burt Reynolds, Wilfred Hyde-White. Some great creature make-up work by Bud Westmore rarely mentioned in the books.

Sadly, apparently not yet released on DVD.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring
mm-3910 May 2003
Taped this late night movie when I was in grade 11, watched it on fast forward. I sugest you do the same. I though it would be and action film, but went to a cort tv type movie. In the end it fits in with the early 70's social activest type films. Glad I missed that era. 2/10
5 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
UNINTENTIONAL FUN
kirbylee70-599-52617923 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Before Burt Reynolds became a household name and an international icon he was working as an actor under contract for Universal Studios. He was just beginning to make a name for himself when he ended up in a movie called SKULLDUGGERY. I can remember seeing the ads in the newspaper for the film. We were two years past PLANET OF THE APES and the creatures in this one looked similar. Of course I was hyped to see the movie. Unfortunately it didn't happen. Which is why I was excited to see that Kino Lorber saved the film from obscurity.

Before jumping into a description of what the film is about let me preface by saying it is about any and all things. This movie jumps from one concept to another with alarming speed. The end result is a movie that's a bit whacky, a bit unusual and a load of fun. Okay moving forward.

Reynolds stars as Doug Temple, a down on his luck adventurer in Papua New Guinea. Along with his cohort Otto Kreps (Roger C. Carmel) he finds an opportunity to make a potential fortune. An anthropological group headed by Dr. Sybil Greame (Susan Clark) is making their way into the jungle. In this same area is a load of phosphorous that Kreps knows can make them rich if they get the land rights first. The duo worm their way into the expedition and off they go.

Eventually arriving in the area they both find what they were looking for but come across something else as well. Living in the area are small half man/half ape creatures they name the Tropi. The creatures are the missing link that man has sought for years. Docile and friendly it isn't long before they are welcomed to the group and each one is named.

This is where the first hard right takes place. Seeing them as a form of cheap labor Doug has the Tropi go to work for him harvesting the minerals he needs to make his fortune. He isn't bad to them but he pays them in canned ham. But this isn't the major abuse the Tropi suffer. The backer for the expedition was a man named Vancruysen (Paul Hubschmid), Greame's fiancé. A wealthy entrepreneur he too sees the Tropi as cheap labor. But he doesn't view them as people but more as cattle. So much so that he also sees them as a food source as well.

The human being inside Doug doesn't take kindly to this concept. Neither does Kreps who has become fond of one of the Tropi. So now the film takes a hard left. We find out that Kreps may have impregnated the Tropi he's become close to. If they can successfully breed with a human then this proves they are indeed the missing link and more human than animal.

Now a hard right and a SPOILER ALERT. The baby is born and dies and Doug claims that he killed the baby. Now the movie becomes a courtroom drama where the legal ramifications are considered. Are the Tropi human or not? Toss in claims of racism against the Tropi, a Black Panther type group that shows up and you have one heck of a mixed up movie.

Directed by Gordon Douglas whose career dated back to the 30s and who was known for films like THE GREAT GILDERSLEEVE, THEM!, UP PERISCOPE, YELLOWSTONE KELLY, IN LIKE FLINT, TONY ROME and more I'm sure the actors thought they were going into a potential hit. The fact is that Douglas no doubt elevated this movie from a low budget B flick to a major studio release. But the studio had no clue how to market the movie. That's easy to understand after watching and not being sure what kind of movie it intended to be.

Everyone involved gives the movie their best efforts though and it shows. The acting on display from everyone here is flawless and that includes the actors in makeup as the Tropi. Reynolds is his usual cocky wise cracker when need be and serious savior later in the film. Clark never gave a bad performance. Carmel had a way of making a strange character loveable and he does so here.

The end result is a movie that will have you entertained and laughing even if that wasn't the original intent. Thank goodness Kino Lorber saved this one. They're presenting the film in a brand new 2k master and extras include an audio commentary track by film historians Howard S. Berger, C. Courtney Joyner and Sergio Mims and a collection of theatrical trailers. If you're looking for something different and something fun then give this one a watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Red headed humans who live like monkeys in the jungle. Probably less wild than civilized humans.
mark.waltz25 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Paratropous Errectus Grayamentus? Or trophy's? Perhaps you should get there permission first as to what you should call them, but they should have been on a lot earlier in this silly science fiction film starring Burt Reynolds and Susan Clark. The film takes forever to get to their discovery, and it's sad to see that immediately civilized society intends to exploit them. These gentle beings are immediately curious about the similar looking beings they encounter, bringing them fruit and acting playful, one even smacking Clark on the rear end and running away like a mischievous child.

Adding little to the film is Roger C. Carmel whom Reynolds and Clark encounter in the jungle (after a very lengthy sequence showing them walking through the jungle with another native tribe), speaking with a very stereotypical, cartoonish Jewish accent, reminding me of very dated comics from films of the 1930's and '40s. The film truly suffers from a very poor production design, with blurry backdrops of some fabulous vistas sadly underwhelming.

This is a 70's film that would have been much more appealing in the 40's, reminding me of Maria Montez and Sabu films from Universal which ironically released this. Reynolds and Clark are attractive and amusing, but I didn't think they had much chemistry. This is fine as passing light entertainment, certain elements of it really had me rolling my eyes. Certain things were rather crudely presented, so in some ways, it's very disturbing.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's clear some reviewers weren't mature enough for this film....
aromadon25 June 2005
This was not a film about "action", nor was it "boring", unless you are the type that requires external stimulation as a substitute for actually thinking. This was a very poignant film about human rights and what, exactly, being human means. As another reviewer said, the climactic ending brought me to tears. This is not a film that should be viewed by a bunch of kids at a sleepover... it will be totally lost and wasted on them. This is a film that should be shown in every political science and philosophy class for discussion. Don't let the pathetic reviews scare you away if you can find this movie... it was the viewer that was lacking, not the film...
31 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's pretty bad
pmtelefon17 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I remember my mother enjoying this movie. It probably had more to do with a shirtless Burt Reynolds than anything else. I watched it today and it's actually a pretty bad movie. Burt is fine in it but his character isn't the greatest. Susan Clark looks good but she's never been one of favorite actresses. The supporting cast is pretty forgettable. The only thing "Skullduggery" has going for it is its terrific locations. Other than that, the movie is ridiculous. When Burt puts the Tropi to work at his mine, I couldn't believe what I was watching. Q: what's the wrong way to end a jungle adventure? A: with a half hour of courtroom scenes.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
very good film that seems misunderstood by the audiences of today
mibmusic-124 May 2007
As another person has commented, this movie deals with some very important social and very HUMAN issues and should be viewed for what it is, not what you wish it would have been.

If you are looking for a brainless action film, look somewhere else. This film is more likely to generate a strong emotional reaction than to wow you with fancy stunts and cliché jungle adventure shtick.

People today are so used to excessive action films that gems like this one seem to be misunderstood or simply ignored. I am hoping this makes it's way to DVD so it can be appreciated in it's original theatrical format.

For the thinking person who can appreciate something with a lot more depth than the 'tomb raider' ilk it may get lumped in with it is definitely worth a viewing.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I have gravitated toward Darwinism ever since...
inkedon11 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I don't really think I'm spoiling anything, but I ticked the box just in case...

I saw this film once and only once when it came on network television one night in the very early 70's, I was at most 7 years old and I have thought about the movie ever since.

Missing link upright bipeds, used as slaves and a court case to determine rights applicable to them.

Someone else's comment was that it was boring. What I recall of it is that the story and climactic finale made me cry until I threw up. I don't recall if the acting was good, or how the movie flowed. I just remember being highly affected by what I had seen and understanding that people also treated other people that way.

Yay for empathy, a new experience for me as a child.

I look forward someday to seeing it again as an adult.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Skullduggery - En busca del eslabón perdido
ppyo13 May 2011
I watched this movie in the early seventies, at my hometown in Mexico. I must have been 14 or 15 at the time. I liked the movie a lot not because of the acting, but because of the subject, which captivated me. The ethical and philosophical question of what constitutes humanity. Maybe the cinematographic quality of the film is not great, but having seen this movie only once and still remembering its impact on me after almost forty years is a tribute to its merits. I remember vividly the shock the climax scene caused in me, and the anger at the injustice done to the poor critters, and their unresolved fate, which undoubtedly would not be a good one if we go by the conventional wisdom of the time. I do believe this movie is much better conceptually than it is generally considered. I hope it will someday be released on DVD. I would certainly buy it.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Truly an unbelievably rotten motion picture
helpless_dancer29 August 1999
One of the most boring, silly, insipid, badly scripted and acted things ever to come out of the entertainment field. Even for Burt Reynolds, this was bad news. If you are home alone and bored to tears don't watch this drivel. Avoid at all costs.
9 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed